Inline and offline extracorporeal photopheresis: Device performance, cell yields and clinical response

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

The objective of this meta-analysis (MA) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) for the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-cGvHD). A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, followed by a feasibility assessment (FA) to assess potential between-study heterogeneity in the meta-analysis (MA). Random-effects MAs were performed for overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), overall response rate (ORR) and skin-specific response. A subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the effect of NIH assessment criteria. The SLR identified 627 records; 45 unique studies were ultimately included in the MA. For patients treated with ECP, at Month 12, the pooled OS rate was 83.97% and the pooled FFS rate was 60.79%. ORR was 45.34% at Months 3 to 4 and 58.23% at Months 6 to 8. Subgroup analyses showed no significant difference in ORR between studies utilizing NIH criteria and those utilizing non-NIH criteria. Skin-specific response was 34.86% at Months 2 to 3 and 54.22% at Months 4 to 6. There was considerable heterogeneity across all analyses, with I2 values ranging from 65% to 91%. This SLR and MA indicates that ECP results in favorable outcomes in the treatment of SR-cGvHD, including OS, FFS and ORR.

A paired study comparing mononuclear cell collection using a new in-line system with an off-line extracorporeal photopheresis apheresis system

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) product characteristics are not well established. The aim of this study was to compare mononuclear cells (MNCs) collection using the new Amicus blue (AB) In-line ECP system to our standard Off-line ECP system using the Optia apheresis device and the MacoGenic G2 inactivation system (OM).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We assessed the ECP products and procedure parameters, patient characteristics, and adverse events for both AB and OM systems in paired patients. Comparisons were made with t-test for paired samples.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients underwent 15 double, paired procedures using both ECP protocols and processing the same blood volume of 4000 mL. Total MNC collected in the product were 51.6 × 108 (95% CI 30.0-73.1) and 42.2 × 108 (95% CI 22.4-62.0) for the AB and OM, respectively (not significant). Both products were also similar regarding volume, MNC concentration, purity, and hematocrit. However, total platelet count (×1011) was significantly lower in the AB products: 0.25 (95% CI 0.15-0.36) versus 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.5). The new AB system reduced significantly also the time invested and anticoagulant used per procedure compared with OM, albeit with similar collection efficiency and percentage of MNC captured per procedure. Hypocalcemia was the commonest adverse event with both systems, but it was not severe.

CONCLUSIONS

The new AB system collected MNC products comparable to our current experience with OM, although in a significantly shorter time, with a reduced use of anticoagulant and lower contamination with platelets, which are all valuable advantages of the new system.

Comparison of two inline photopheresis systems: A paired crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The inline system was developed by Therakos in 1987. Recently, Fresenius Kabi implemented an integration of cell separator Amicus and a UVA photoactivation device (Phelix), realizing an inline photopheresis system.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In 2022 we designed a prospective paired crossover trial (NCT05718674) comparing two integrated ECP protocols: Therakos CELLEX and Amicus ECP system. Twenty patients affected by corticosteroid resistant GvHD were submitted to 80 ECP, 40 paired procedures.

RESULTS

All procedures were well tolerated, with no significant differences in procedure duration. CELLEX cell product showed higher granulocytes and platelet content, while Amicus cell product exhibited higher enrichment of lymphocytes, resulting in significantly higher MNC purity (92.9% vs. 84%). A significantly higher granulocytes and platelets absolute content was observed in CELLEX cell products, while Amicus cell products showed a significantly higher number of TNCs and MNCs. Differences in granulocyte and platelet content remained significant even after normalization of the data according to blood volume processed. These findings are confirmed by a statistically significant higher CE2% for CELLEX for granulocytes and platelets along with the lack of significant difference observed for TNCs and MNCs.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis shows differences in the characteristics of the procedure and the cell product. Anyway, both devices are effective for performing ECP procedure, as they collect a cell product suitable for photopheresis. At present, our results represent the first data set comparing two available inline ECP devices.

Evaluating a New Photopheresis System: A Comparison with Two Established Systems on Cell Yield and Collection Efficiency

Background/Objectives: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a well-established and efficacious cell therapy for a range of diseases. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the new Amicus Blue inline system with the Therakos Cellex inline system and the Spectra Optia offline system in terms of collection efficiency, mononuclear cell (MNC) yield of mononuclear cell products (MCPs), processing time and correlation between MCP cell count and peripheral blood count of patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared 127 procedures utilizing the Spectra Optia offline system, 93 procedures employing the Amicus Blue inline system, and 81 procedures applying the Therakos Cellex inline system. The MNCs were subjected to flow cytometry analysis for CD45 and CD14 expression in order to ascertain the precise composition of the collected lymphocyte and monocyte fractions.

RESULTS

The Therakos inline system demonstrated the highest MNC collection efficiency (Therakos: 74.42 ± 1.82; Optia: 65.79 ± 1.48; Amicus: 56.32 ± 2.80; p < 0.01). Regarding the content of collected MNCs (×10⁶/kg body weight), the Spectra Optia offline system was superior to the other systems (Optia: 42.69 ± 1.42; Therakos: 31.21 ± 1.66; Amicus: 27.56 ± 1.54; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first direct comparison of the new Amicus Blue inline system with the two most commonly used ECP systems in the same patient cohort of a single center. The data show that the Amicus Blue inline system collects sufficient MNCs to perform an ECP, but it has a significantly lower CE than the other systems and a significantly lower amount of collected MNCs than the Spectra Optia offline system.

Treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease with extracorporeal photopheresis: Update of best practice recommendations from Italian Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation (SIdEM) and the Italian Transplant Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Cell Therapy (GITMO)

These guidelines represent a GRADE-method revision of the recommendations produced by the Italian Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation (SIDEM) and the Italian Transplant Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Cell Therapy (GITMO) in 2013. Since 2013 several studies have been published that have strengthened the role of ECP in the management of GVHD. Thus, it was deemed appropriate to proceed with an update, with the aim to define uniform criteria for the application of ECP in adult and pediatric patients affected by GVHD throughout the national territory, in line with international guidelines, in maintaining of high standards of safety for patients and quality of the procedures provide. Post-HSCT GvHD therapies other than ECP and ECP therapy of other diseases, such as CTCL, are not covered by these guidelines.The development panel for this guideline includes professionals from various specialties who routinely interact in the management of the patient with GVHD, namely the transfusionist, the adult and pediatric hematologist, and the hospital pharmacist. A hematologist experienced in systematic reviews and GRADE guideline development ccordinated the development process, and an experienced transfusionist coordinated the assignment of tasks and reporting. External reviewers of the guideline included a patient representative.

Real-World Experience in Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Adults with Graft-versus-Host Disease

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has shown efficacy in treating graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We aim to summarize eight years of real-world experience with off-line ECP in our institution, in order to validate this treatment schedule and analyze predictive factors. All consecutive adult patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory GVHD undergoing off-line ECP were included in this single-center retrospective study. ECP was performed with a Spectra Optia device, processing 1 total blood volume, at a twice-weekly frequency for acute GVHD (aGVHD) and once weekly for chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and tapered individually according to clinical response. The cumulative incidence of response, including complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), were compared among patients grouped by different baseline, apheresis, and disease characteristics. Between January 2015 and May 2022, a total of 1382 ECP procedures were proposed for 82 patients. No incidents were reported in 97% of the ECP sessions. GVHD responded in 78% of patients (aGVHD: 57% CR and 4% PR; cGVHD, 39% CR and 48% PR). Overall survival was statistically greater for aGVHD patients who responded to ECP compared to those who did not respond (67.5% versus 26% at 1 year; P = 0.037). Severity was an independent predictor of response in aGVHD, whereas the absence of mouth involvement and lower lymphocyte counts in the apheresis product correlated with a higher response in cGVHD. Our findings support the effectiveness of this treatment schedule for GVHD. Further investigation is required to identify ECP-specific predictive factors, given that findings are not homogeneous across studies.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Graft-versus-Host Disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), which exposes mononuclear cells to ultraviolet A irradiation in the presence of a photosensitizing agent, has shown efficacy in the treatment of GVHD. Recent observations in molecular and cell biology have revealed the mechanisms by which ECP can reverse GVHD, including lymphocyte apoptosis, differentiation of dendritic cells from circulating monocytes, and modification of the cytokine profile and T cell subpopulations. Technical innovations have made ECP accessible to a broader range of patients; however, logistical constraints may limit its use. In this review, we scrutinize the development of ECP from its origins to recent insights into the biology underlying ECP efficacy. We also review practical aspects that may complicate successful ECP treatment. Finally, we analyze how these theoretical concepts translate into clinical practice, summarizing the published experiences of leading research groups worldwide.

Increasing the collection flow rate to 2 mL/min is effective and reduces the procedure time in off-line photopheresis

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) treatment, mostly based on apheresis technology, is used for immunomodulation in various diseases such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, graft versus host disease and other (auto)immune disorders. The aim of this study was to collect high cell counts and purity in shorter procedure times using an ECP off-line system with an increased collection flow rate of 2 mL/min to a target volume of 200 mL buffy coat.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this prospective study, data of routinely performed off-line photopheresis treatments were collected and analyzed at the Central Institute for Blood Transfusion & Department of Immunology (ZIB) of the Tirol Kliniken, to assess absolute cell counts and procedure times and to calculate collection efficiencies (CE2).

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients participated in this study. The processed blood volume was 4312 mL, the collection time 120 min, overall procedure time 157 min and the absolute cell counts of treated white blood cells (WBC) and mononuclear cells (MNC) were 5.0 and 4.3 × 109 respectively (median values). The calculated CE2 for WBC and MNC was 21.1% and 58.5%, the proportion of treated MNCs of the total number of MNCs present was 55.0%.

CONCLUSION

The data presented in this study show high therapeutically effective cell counts collected with a high MNC purity within a shorter overall collection/procedure time due to an increased collection flow rate.

Optimierung der extrakorporalen Photopherese

Die Extrakorporale Photopherese ist ein etabliertes Therapieverfahren für Patienten mit T-Zell vermittelten Erkrankungen. Dabei besteht das Verfahren aus der Gewinnung autologer mononukleärer Zellen, deren Behandlung mit 8-Methoxypsoralen und UVA-Licht und die Retransfusion der behandelten Zellen.

Die Wirkmechanismen der Photopherese sind zwar noch nicht vollständig geklärt, ein zentraler Mechanismus stellt jedoch die Apoptose mononukleärer Zellen dar. Das Ziel der Studie war eine Optimierung der Photopherese im Hinblick auf die Behandlung der Zellen mit 8-Methoxypsoralen/UVA und der daraus induzierten verstärkten Apoptose der Lymphozyten. Dabei sind einige Faktoren bekannt, welche die Effektivität der 8-Methoxypsoralen/UVA-Behandlung der Zellen beeinflussen können, wie z.B. der Hämatokrit oder die UVA-Dosis. Unser Fokus lag auf der Verfügbarkeit der photoaktiven Substanz und dem Einfluss der Zellsuspensionsmatrix auf die Apoptose der Lymphozyten.

Die Verfügbarkeit von 8-Methoxypsoralen für die Aufnahme in die Zellen reduzierte sich durch Absorption an Kunststoffe der Bestrahlungssysteme sowie durch Bindung an Proteine bei der Verwendung von autologem Plasma bei der Suspendierung der Zellen. Eine Steigerung der Zugabe von 8-Methoxypsoralen auf 340 ng/mL anstelle von 200 ng/mL führte zu einem Anstieg der T-Zell Apoptose, die sich unter Verwendung von physiologischer Kochsalzlösung als Zellsuspensionsmatrix weiter erhöhte. Eine Anpassung des Verfahrens mit NaCl anstelle von Plasma und die Verwendung einer höheren 8-Methoxypsoralen Konzentration führte zu einer gesteigerten Apoptoseinduktion der T-Zellen. Inwiefern sich eine Erhöhung der Apoptose auf die klinische Wirksamkeit auswirkt, bedarf hingegen noch weiterer klinischen Untersuchungen.

Mechanisms of Action of Extracorporeal Photopheresis in the Control of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS): Involvement of Circulating miRNAs

Clinical evidence suggests an improvement or stabilization of lung function in a fraction of patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) treated by extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP); however, few studies have explored the epigenetic and molecular regulation of this therapy. The aim of present study was to evaluate whether a specific set of miRNAs were significantly regulated by ECP. Total RNA was isolated from serum of patients with established BOS grade 1–2 prior to the start and after 6 months of ECP treatment. We observed a significant downregulation of circulating hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR-146a-5p and hsa-miR-31-5p in BOS patients at the start of ECP when compared to healthy subjects. In responders, increased miR-155-5p and decreased miR-23b-3p expression levels at 6 months were found. SMAD4 mRNA was found to be a common target of these two miRNAs in prediction pathways analysis, and a significant downregulation was found at 6 months in PBMCs of a subgroup of ECP-treated patients. According to previous evidence, the upregulation of miR-155 might be correlated with a pro-tolerogenic modulation of the immune system. Our analysis also suggests that SMAD4 might be a possible target for miR-155-5p. Further longitudinal studies are needed to address the possible role of miR-155 and its downstream targets.

Comparison of procedure times and collection efficiencies using integrated and multistep nonintegrated procedures for extracorporeal photopheresis

Background

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a blood‐based therapeutic procedure increasingly used for modulation of immune dysregulation in various underlying disease settings. The aim of this study was to compare the procedure times and blood collection efficiencies between the two approaches currently utilized in European centers: the integrated versus the multistep nonintegrated procedures.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis was conducted, comparing treatment data from patients who received ECP therapy at the Central Institute for Blood Transfusion & Department of Immunology (ZIB) of the Tirol Kliniken GmbH, where the integrated and multistep nonintegrated procedures are routinely used in an approximated setup.

Results

During the observation period, a total of 15 patients who were treated with alternating systems on 2 consecutive days were identified. This allowed treatment pair comparisons with minimal interpatient variabilities, similar to a cross‐over design even though analyzed retrospectively. Total average procedure times with the integrated system were 99.3 vs 122.0 minutes with the multistep nonintegrated procedures, respectively. Significant differences were observed for all steps of the ECP procedure: (a) time for buffy coat collection, 66.5 vs 74.7; (b) handling/transfer, 2.8 vs 18.7; (c) irradiation, 20.3 vs 11.7; and (d) reinfusion/handling time, 9.6 vs 16.3 minutes. The calculated collection throughput was 7.79 mL/min for the integrated and 7.84 mL/min for the multistep nonintegrated procedures, and with a white blood cell (WBC) collection efficiency of 34.2% and 21.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

The data presented in this study show a significant shorter overall procedure time and higher WBC collection efficiency for the integrated ECP system.

In situ off-line extracorporeal photopheresis conducted in a real-life situation at a Hemobiotherapy Department in France: A comparison of costs vs on-line procedure

BACKGROUND

The off-line extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) procedure requires photosensitization in an external cell therapy laboratory as per the French regulatory requirement. This regulation results in higher time and costs compared with the on-line alternative performed entirely at the patient's bedside. Recently, full in situ execution of the off-line procedure has been implemented in the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital Hemobiotherapy Department (Paris, France). This report summarizes the center's experience regarding the organizational and costs impacts of this change compared with the on-line procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

ECP was broken down into stages, and several procedures were monitored prospectively in real-life settings. The total costs associated with both procedures were the sum of the fixed costs and variable costs related to all stages of the procedures, nursing-time costs, property costs, and patient-related production loss costs.

RESULTS

Eight off-line ECP and fourteen on-line ECP procedures were monitored during five consecutive days. Procedure duration was not different (median 137.5 vs 154.0 minutes, P = .29). Times and costs associated with nursing were higher but offset by lower fixed costs of the off-line ECP. Total direct costs per procedure associated with using the off-line ECP were significantly lower than those of the on-line procedure (459.6 ± 7.1 EUR vs 953.8 ± 6.5 EUR; P = .0002). Similar results were observed when including the costs of patient production loss.

CONCLUSIONS

As a competitive time procedure, the in situ off-line method proved to be cost-efficient by effectively offering similar patient treatment per year compared with the on-line procedure.