Correlation of in vitro drug sensitivity testing results with response to chemotherapy and survival: comparison of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer

Cancer Stem Cell Assay for the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Disease recurrence and progression of ovarian cancer is a common event, which is accompanied by the development of platinum-resistant or refractory disease. The presence of chemo-resistant Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance of this difficult to treat disease. We have developed ChemoID, a cytotoxic synergy assay against CSCs that identifies the most effective chemotherapy treatment from a panel of FDA-approved chemotherapies using fresh cancer biopsies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ascites or interventional radiology biopsies were collected under physician order from 78 consecutive patients affected by 3rd relapsed ovarian cancer. Test results from the assay were used when possible to treat patients with the highest cell kill drugs, taking into consideration their health status and using dose reductions, if needed. A chart analysis and review of CT and PET scans were performed to determine patients' outcomes for tumor response, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS).

RESULTS

We observed that recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with high-cell kill chemotherapy agents guided by the CSCs drug response assay had an improvement in their median PFS and OS when compared to historical median PFS and OS and/or when compared to patients who could not receive high cell kill chemotherapies (PFS low cell kill 3.5 months vs. high cell kill 12.0 months; OS low cell kill 6.0 months vs. high cell kill 15.0 months).

CONCLUSION

This data indicates that the drug cytotoxicity assay aimed at targeting CSCs may be a useful tool for optimizing treatment selection when first-line therapy fails, and when there are multiple clinically-acceptable and -equivalent treatments available.

From clinical specimens to human cancer preclinical models-a journey the NCI-cell line database-25 years later

The intramural the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and more recently the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center with many different collaborators comprised a complex, multi-disciplinary team that collaborated to generated large, comprehensively annotated, cell-line related research resources which includes associated clinical, and molecular characterization data. This material has been shared in an anonymized fashion to accelerate progress in overcoming lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death across the world. However, this cell line collection also includes a range of other cancers derived from patient-donated specimens that have been remarkably valuable for other types of cancer and disease research. A comprehensive analysis conducted by the NCI Center for Research Strategy of the 278 cell lines reported in the original Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Supplement, documents that these cell lines and related products have since been used in more than 14 000 grants, and 33 207 published scientific reports. This has resulted in over 1.2 million citations using at least one cell line. Many publications involve the use of more than one cell line, to understand the value of the resource collectively rather than individually; this method has resulted in 2.9 million citations. In addition, these cell lines have been linked to 422 clinical trials and cited by 4700 patents through publications. For lung cancer alone, the cell lines have been used in the research cited in the development of over 70 National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical guidelines. Finally, it must be underscored again, that patient altruism enabled the availability of this invaluable research resource.

Personalized Chemosensitivity Assays for Mesothelioma: Are They Worth the Effort?

Cell lines formed from an individual's tumor can be used to predict response to specific therapies and determine genomic predictors. For mesothelioma, where chemotherapy remains the backbone of current therapeutic paradigms, such assays could be used to treat patients with the most effective agents specific to their "chemical profile." Clin Cancer Res; 24(7); 1513-5. ©2018 AACRSee related article by Schunselaar et al., p. 1761.

Exploiting high-throughput cell line drug screening studies to identify candidate therapeutic agents in head and neck cancer

Background

There is an urgent need for better therapeutics in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) to improve survival and decrease treatment morbidity. Recent advances in high-throughput drug screening techniques and next-generation sequencing have identified new therapeutic targets in other cancer types, but an HNSCC-specific study has not yet been carried out. We have exploited data from two large-scale cell line projects to clearly describe the mutational and copy number status of HNSCC cell lines and identify candidate drugs with elevated efficacy in HNSCC.

Methods

The genetic landscape of 42 HNSCC cell lines including mutational and copy number data from studies by Garnett et al., and Barretina et al., were analyzed. Data from Garnett et al. was interrogated for relationships between HNSCC cells versus the entire cell line pool using one- and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs). As only seven HNSCC cell lines were tested with drugs by Barretina et al., a similar analysis was not carried out.

Results

Recurrent mutations in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative patient tumors were confirmed in HNSCC cell lines, however additional, recurrent, cell line-specific mutations were identified. Four drugs, Bosutinib, Docetaxel, BIBW2992, and Gefitinib, were found via multiple-test corrected ANOVA to have lower IC₅₀ values, suggesting higher drug sensitivity, in HNSCC lines versus non-HNSCC lines. Furthermore, the PI3K inhibitor AZD6482 demonstrated significantly higher activity (as measured by the IC₅₀) in HNSCC cell lines harbouring PIK3CA mutations versus those that did not.

Conclusion

HNSCC-specific reanalysis of large-scale drug screening studies has identified candidate drugs that may be of therapeutic benefit and provided insights into strategies to target PIK3CA mutant tumors. PIK3CA mutations may represent a predictive biomarker for response to PI3K inhibitors. A large-scale study focused on HNSCC cell lines and including HPV-positive lines is necessary and has the potential to accelerate the development of improved therapeutics for patients suffering with head and neck cancer. This strategy can potentially be used as a template for drug discovery in any cancer type.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2050-6511-15-66) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ABCC3 as a marker for multidrug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Multidrug resistance (MDR) contributes to the failure of chemotherapy and high mortality in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aim to identify MDR genes that predict tumor response to chemotherapy. 199 NSCLC fresh tissue samples were tested for chemosensitivity by MTT assay. cDNA microarray was done with 5 samples with highest resistance and 6 samples with highest sensitivity. Expression of ABCC3 mRNA and protein was detected by real-time PCR and immunohistochemisty, respectively. The association between gene expression and overall survival (OS) was examined using Cox proportional hazard regression. 44 genes were upregulated and 168 downregulated in the chemotherapy-resistant group. ABCC3 was one of the most up-regulated genes in the resistant group. ABCC3-positive expression correlated with lymph node involvement, advanced TNM stage, more malignant histological type, multiple-resistance to anti-cancer drugs, and reduced OS. ABCC3 expression may serve as a marker for MDR and predictor for poor clinical outcome of NSCLC.

Insights into the achaete-scute homolog-1 gene (hASH1) in normal and neoplastic human lung

Achaete-scute homolog-1 (ASH1) is pivotal for the development of pulmonary neuroendocrine (NE) cells. We examined human ASH1 (hASH1) expression across a comprehensive panel of human lung cancer cell lines, primary human lung tumors and normal fetal and post-natal lungs. While hASH1 was a cardinal feature of NE carcinomas, a subgroup of non-NE lung cancers also exhibited expression of this factor. Twenty lung cancer cell lines out of 33 were positive for hASH1 mRNA by reverse transcription PCR, including 6/6 small cell carcinomas (SCLC), 5/5 carcinoids, 6/7 non-SCLC with NE features, and 3/14 other non-SCLC. Among human primary tumors, 2/2 SCLC, 5/5 pulmonary carcinoids, and 10/41 non-SCLC (only 4 of which had NE features) were positive for hASH1 by immunohistochemistry and RNA-RNA in situ hybridization. In normal human fetal lung, the expression of hASH1 and the neural marker synaptophysin was highly concordant in neuroepithelial bodies and solitary NE cells, while the rest of the epithelium was negative. In childhood and adulthood, the markers became progressively discordant, with a majority of hASH1-immunoreactive foci (69%) being negative for synaptophysin in adults, potentially representing dormant NE cell progenitors. We conclude that hASH1 provides an early indication of NE program in human lung.

Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST)

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the differences in chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs between primary and metastatic lesions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we examined the in vitro chemosensitivities of surgically resected NSCLC tissues.

METHODS

A total of 32 specimens were enrolled: 26 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lymph node, 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the adrenal gland, and 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lung. The collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST) was applied to examine the sensitivity of the tissues to anticancer drugs, including cisplatin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil.

RESULTS

The degree of in vitro sensitivity to each anticancer drug varied between the primary and metastatic lesions. The sensitivity of the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that of the primary lesions only for gemcitabine (P=0.029), vinorelbine (P=0.012), and docetaxel (P=0.009). The incidence of cases diagnosed as CD-DST-sensitive among the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that for the primary lesions for vinorelbine (P=0.035) or docetaxel (P=0.022). The difference in the sensitivity to gemcitabine between the primary and paired non-lymphatic metastases was clearer than that between the primary lesion and paired lymph node metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivities of the paired metastatic lesions to some anticancer drugs were significantly lower than those of the primary lesions. When performing chemotherapy based on CD-DST data using primary tumors from patients with postoperative recurrence, an appropriate regimen can be selected by carefully considering these differences.

Parameters for individualizing systemic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Rational drug design based on molecular targets is starting to revolutionize cancer care. To maximize its potential for patients, a concomitant leveraging of molecular knowledge for selection of patients to future and current therapeutic options is paramount. The terms "individualized", "personalized", or "precision therapy" are currently used to describe these efforts. Here, we summarize current knowledge for selection of systemic targeted and cytotoxic therapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Based on this knowledge, we present a potential decision algorithm to best select patients for currently available therapies, which include the treatment options single-agent erlotinib or gefitinib, the ALK inhibitor crizotinib, double agent gemcitabine and platinum, double agent platinum and pemetrexed, and as a default option a taxane combined with a non-platinum drug, for instance a vinca alkaloid. The addition of bevacizumab to double-agent chemotherapy is also discussed. Currently available data on predictive biomarkers are largely based on subgroup or companion biomarker analyses of patient cohorts or clinical trials. Current and emerging markers must be incorporated prospectively into the design of clinical trials that test novel and established agents to better understand their clinical utility and to refine selection parameters and marker interactions. Future development will lead to increasing complexity in clinical decision making with substantial anticipated benefits to patients including increased therapeutic efficacy, reduced toxicity, and better quality of life.

Tumor and host factors that may limit efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer

While chemotherapy provides useful palliation, advanced lung cancer remains incurable since those tumors that are initially sensitive to therapy rapidly develop acquired resistance. Resistance may arise from impaired drug delivery, extracellular factors, decreased drug uptake into tumor cells, increased drug efflux, drug inactivation by detoxifying factors, decreased drug activation or binding to target, altered target, increased damage repair, tolerance of damage, decreased proapoptotic factors, increased antiapoptotic factors, or altered cell cycling or transcription factors. Factors for which there is now substantial clinical evidence of a link to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) resistance to chemotherapy include MRP (for platinum-based combination chemotherapy) and MDR1/P-gp (for non-platinum agents). SPECT MIBI and Tc-TF scanning appears to predict chemotherapy benefit in SCLC. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the strongest clinical evidence is for taxane resistance with elevated expression or mutation of class III beta-tubulin (and possibly alpha tubulin), platinum resistance and expression of ERCC1 or BCRP, gemcitabine resistance and RRM1 expression, and resistance to several agents and COX-2 expression (although COX-2 inhibitors have had minimal impact on drug efficacy clinically). Tumors expressing high BRCA1 may have increased resistance to platinums but increased sensitivity to taxanes. Limited early clinical data suggest that chemotherapy resistance in NSCLC may also be increased with decreased expression of cyclin B1 or of Eg5, or with increased expression of ICAM, matrilysin, osteopontin, DDH, survivin, PCDGF, caveolin-1, p21WAF1/CIP1, or 14-3-3sigma, and that IGF-1R inhibitors may increase efficacy of chemotherapy, particularly in squamous cell carcinomas. Equivocal data (with some positive studies but other negative studies) suggest that NSCLC tumors with some EGFR mutations may have increased sensitivity to chemotherapy, while K-ras mutations and expression of GST-pi, RB or p27kip1 may possibly confer resistance. While limited clinical data suggest that p53 mutations are associated with resistance to platinum-based therapies in NSCLC, data on p53 IHC positivity are equivocal. To date, resistance-modulating strategies have generally not proven clinically useful in lung cancer, although small randomized trials suggest a modest benefit of verapamil and related agents in NSCLC.

Assay-based response evaluation in head and neck oncology: requirements for better decision making

This article gives an overview on different current strategies of assay-based response evaluation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) and critically summarizes their role and needs for future clinical evaluation. Due to a growing amount of data of phase III clinical trials of multimodality treatment options for HNSCC, treatment planning in regard to optimal outcome is becoming an interdisciplinary challenge. New concepts such as induction chemotherapy with bi- or ternary combinations of chemotherapeutics, integration of targeted therapies, concurrent and sequential chemoradiation concepts, and multimodality-based organ preservation strategies strongly compete with traditional definitive surgical procedures. Moreover, the outcome is difficult to predict due to heterogeneity of a tumor's response, impaired late functional outcome, and increased late toxicity if simultaneously applied to radiation. Retrospectively looking at non-responders with tumors classified as resectable, primary surgery is very likely to have achieved better results, since chemoradiation causes a high degree of early and late toxicities leading to extremely complicated terms and conditions in surgery following current multimodal therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, predictive information on response characteristics of a given tumor before starting the therapy is not available in daily routine, although heterogeneity in response of a given tumor entity to treatments has been known for decades. Therefore, current therapy strategies for HNSCC still have to ignore this fact, creating an urgent need for the development of proper predictive assays. There are interesting clinical observations showing that response on induction chemotherapy may predict the outcome after radiotherapy. Some trials use this empiric phenomenon to pre-select non-responders for primary surgical treatment avoiding severe salvage complications after failure of complete chemoradiation treatment. Moving one step further, recent literature and our own investigations implicate that response evaluation of the individual patient's HNSCC in a suitable ex vivo assay just before starting the treatment is mature for clinical research. To this end, essential needs and hints are addressed and discussed.

Prediction of chemotherapeutic effect on postoperative recurrence by in vitro anticancer drug sensitivity testing in non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST), is an in vitro anticancer drug sensitivity test. The test has been used with various types of malignant tumors, but the significance of clinical application remains unknown. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the ability of this test to predict the response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

From January 2000 through March 2007, CD-DST data using the primary tumor specimens to anticancer drugs such as cisplatin (CDDP), carboplatin (CBDCA), paclitaxel (PAC), docetaxel (TXT), gemcitabine (GEM), and vinorelbine (VNR), was successfully obtained from 382 patients that underwent a radical resection for NSCLC. Eighty-one of those patients received 1st line chemotherapy using a "new generation" of anticancer drugs for postoperative recurrence. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a CDDP (or CBDCA)-based combination (N=41), non-CDDP-based combination (N=1) and single agent (N=39). The predictability of the chemotherapeutic effect by the CD-DST data was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Partial response (PR) was obtained in 24 patients (response rate=30%), stable disease (SD) in 33 (41%) and progressive disease (PD) in 24 (30%). Forty-two patients underwent chemotherapy with one or more CD-DST-sensitive drugs, 21 of whom showed PR (RR=50%), whereas only 3 (8%) patients showed PR with chemotherapy with regimen including no CD-DST-sensitive drugs. Good predictability was obtained, with a 50% positive predictive value (PPV) for PR and a 92% negative predictive value (NPV) by CD-DST. The predictive accuracy for the response based on the CD-DST data was 70%. Interestingly, a subset analysis according to recurrence site showed that the predictive accuracy was highest (86%) for CD-DST-based chemotherapy for recurrence in the lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of the CD-DST for "new generation" anticancer drugs using surgically resected specimens of primary lesion in NSCLC patients may be clinically useful in the prediction of the response to chemotherapy for postoperative recurrence. CD-DST-oriented chemotherapy for postoperative recurrence especially in the lymph nodes may therefore be promising for the improvement of the treatment outcome.

Extreme drug resistance assay results do not influence survival in women with epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Extreme drug resistance (EDR) assays have been used to identify chemotherapy regimens that are least likely to be of clinical benefit in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We sought to examine the impact of EDR assay-guided therapy on the outcome of patients with EOC in the primary and recurrent settings.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of demographic, pathologic, EDR assay and clinical outcome data from 377 patients with EOC who had an assay sent at the time of their primary or subsequent cytoreductive surgeries. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards method to identify and estimate the impact of independent prognostic factors on time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and survival after recurrence (RS).

RESULTS

Increasing age was associated with a worse OS and RS (HR=1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.58 and HR=1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31, respectively for each decade increase in age). Surgical outcome in the setting of primary or secondary cytoreduction remained an important predictor of survival. Compared with patients with microscopic residual disease, patients who were left with 0.1 to 1.0 cm and >1.0 cm residual disease had an increased risk of recurrence (HR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.84 and HR=3.61; 95% CI; 2.07 to 6.39, respectively) and death (HR=1.59; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.45; and HR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.20, respectively). For patients who recurred, those who did not undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery and patients who were left with >1.0 cm residual had an increased risk of death compared to patients with microscopic residual (HR=2.13; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.54; and HR=2.84; 95% CI, 1.71 to 4.71, respectively). EDR assay results analyzed for single agents or combinations of chemotherapies failed to independently predict patient outcomes no matter if the assay was performed at the time of the primary surgery or recurrence.

CONCLUSION

EDR assay results do not independently predict or alter the outcomes of patients with EOC who are treated with the current standards of primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum and taxane combination chemotherapy.

In vitro assays for the evaluation of drug resistance in tumor cells

Oncologic diseases are among leading cause of mortality in developed countries. Despite significant progress, the use of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy has reached a therapeutical plateau. Currently, the process of selecting chemotherapy represents a trial and error method neglecting biological individuality of tumor and its bearer. The improvement of treatment results is expected from ex vivo drug sensitivity testing which may allow to choose the most effective drug for individual patient and to exclude agents to which the tumor cells exert resistance. New techniques and rapidly increasing knowledge about the molecular basis of malignant diseases provide important opportunities for the future of chemotherapy. This paper reviews current methods used to test the resistance of tumor cells to a panel of anticancer agents in vitro. In addition, we focused on the in vitro MTT assay which represents one of major technique for testing of tumor cell resistance to anticancer agents.

Adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA)-guided platinum-based 2-drug chemotherapy for unresectable nonsmall-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The study investigated correlations between adenosine triphosphate / chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA) and clinical outcomes after ATP-CRA-guided platinum-based chemotherapy for unresectable nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The authors performed an in vitro chemosensitivity test, ATP-CRA, to evaluate the chemosensitivities of anticancer drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine for chemonaive, unresectable NSCLC. The cell death rate was determined by measuring the intracellular ATP levels of drug-exposed cells compared with untreated controls. A sensitive drug was defined as a drug producing 30% or more reduction in ATP compared with untreated controls. Assay-guided platinum-based 2-drug chemotherapy was given to patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Thirty tumor specimens were obtained by bronchoscopic biopsies and 4 obtained surgically. The median age was 61 years and 27 patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1. The response rate was 43.8%. At a median follow-up period of 16.9 months, the median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.6 and 11.2 months, respectively. Patients were dichotomized into the platinum-sensitive (S; 20 patients) and resistant (R; 14 patients) groups. The positive/negative predictive values were 61.1% and 78.6% with a predictive accuracy of 68.8%. Although without significant differences in pretreatment parameters, the S-group showed better clinical response (P=.036), longer progression-free survival (P=.060), and longer overall survival (P=.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite using bronchoscopic biopsied specimens, ATP-CRA and clinical outcomes correlated well after assay-guided platinum-based 2-drug chemotherapy for unresectable NSCLC. There was a favorable response and survival in the platinum-sensitive vs resistant groups.

Data acquisition for the histoculture drug response assay in lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Application of the histoculture drug response assay for lung cancer was investigated by using data acquired from lung cancer specimens.

METHODS

From May 1994 through February 2005, histoculture drug response assay data were obtained from 359 lung cancer specimens held in our institute. We examined chemosensitivities of the tissues to cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, paclitaxel, etoposide, irinotecan, and gemcitabine. Cutoff inhibition rates were determined with each drug for non-small cell lung cancer and were used to calculate predictabilities for chemotherapy responses.

RESULTS

The evaluability of the histoculture drug response assay was high at 97.4%. Good predictability, including true-positive and true-negative rates of 73.2% and 100%, respectively, with an accuracy of 83.0%, was observed.

CONCLUSION

The histoculture drug response assay appears to be applicable to non-small cell lung cancer for the prediction of responses to chemotherapy.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment: chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays

PURPOSE

To develop a technology assessment of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays in order to define the role of these tests in routine oncology practice.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established a Working Group to develop the technology assessment. The Working Group collaborated with the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) Technology Evaluation Center. The Working Group developed independent criteria for selecting articles for inclusion in the ASCO assessment, and developed a structured data abstraction tool to facilitate review of selected manuscripts. One Working Group member and an ASCO staff member independently reviewed the 1,139 abstracts identified by the BCBSA comprehensive literature search, and by an updated literature search performed by ASCO using the BCBSA search strategy (1966 to January 2004). Of the 12 articles included in this technology assessment, eight were identified by the original BCBSA systematic review, one was provided by industry, and three were identified by the ASCO updated literature review.

RESULTS

Review of the literature does not identify any CSRAs for which the evidence base is sufficient to support use in oncology practice.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The use of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays to select chemotherapeutic agents for individual patients is not recommended outside of the clinical trial setting. Oncologists should make chemotherapy treatment recommendations on the basis of published reports of clinical trials and a patient's health status and treatment preferences. Because the in vitro analytic strategy has potential importance, participation in clinical trials evaluating these technologies remains a priority.

Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluates evidence comparing therapy guided by chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays with empiric chemotherapy, emphasizing survival outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective studies were sought comparing patients treated contemporaneously by assay-guided chemotherapy and empiric therapy. An initial MEDLINE search and a search performed by a Working Group of the American Society of Clinical Oncology were reviewed with attention to prespecified study selection criteria.

RESULTS

This review identified 10 studies meeting selection criteria, plus one retrospective study, using seven different assays. Only two studies randomly assigned patients to assay-guided treatment or empiric treatment. Five of nine nonrandomized studies found significantly higher response rates for patients who received assay-guided therapy compared with those treated empirically. One of the two randomized trials found a significantly higher response rate in the assay-guided group. Four additional studies found response rates favoring assay-guided therapy, but comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. Two nonrandomized studies found overall survival to be significantly improved with assay-guided therapy. One randomized study used a cross-over design that made it difficult to determine whether survival differed between groups, while the other randomized trial found no difference in survival. Six studies provided no comparison of groups on baseline patient characteristics. Only one study reported adverse events data.

CONCLUSION

While higher response rates for assay-guided therapy have been observed, differences may be attributable to bias or confounding. Little evidence on survival is available. These results do not establish the relative effectiveness of assay-guided treatment and empiric treatment. Randomized trials are needed.

Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer using the histoculture drug response assay

BACKGROUND

Chemoresponse is a significant outcome predictor in patients with head and neck cancer, regardless of the treatment modality used. The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) has been shown to be a reliable method for in vitro chemoresponse assessment. In this study, we have correlated the HDRA assessment with survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHOD

Tumor specimens from 41 of 42 patients undergoing treatment for HNSCC were successfully evaluated by the HDRA. Tumor tissue was histocultured on Gelfoam sponges gel in 24-well plates, followed by treatment with cisplatin (15 microg/mL) or 5-fluorouracil (40 microg/mL) in triplicate. A control group received no drug treatment. After completion of drug treatment, the relative cell survival in the tumors was determined using the MTT assay. The inhibition rate (IR) for each drug was calculated relative to the control for each case, and sensitivity was defined as a tumor IR of greater than 30%. Treatment was based on established protocols for the location and stage of the tumor and included surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy. Survival comparisons were performed using the generalized Wilcoxon test for the comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

Resistance to 5-fluorouracil was present in 13 cases (32%), to cisplatinum in 13 cases (32%), and to both agents in 11 cases (27%). The 2-year cause-specific survival was significantly greater for patients sensitive to 5-fluorouracil (85% vs 64%; p =.04), cisplatinum (86% vs 64%; p =.05), or both agents (85% vs 63%; p =.01). The association between HDRA assessment of chemoresponse and clinical outcome remained significant even after controlling for the effects of TNM stage and the presence of recurrent cancer at presentation by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemosensitivity determined by the HDRA seems to be a strong predictor of survival in patients with advanced HNSCC and should be considered further.

In situ detection of unexpected patterns of mutant p53 gene expression in non-small cell lung cancers

Many solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), are characterized by heterogenous expression of p53 protein in the neoplastic cells. To analyse the molecular implications of this finding, we examined topographic distribution of p53 mutations using in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in primary NSCLCs, showing distinct patterns of variable p53 overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Unique sets of primers for each mutation were designed, and optimal PCR conditions were determined by standard PCR using DNA from cloned mutants or cell lines established from these tumors. All tumor cell nuclei, regardless of the status of p53 overexpression, demonstrated homogeneous distribution of mutant p53 with specific primers, indicating that only subgroups of the mutated cells overexpressed p53 protein. In situ reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was applied to detect mutant mRNA in the individual tumor cells using specific primers. We found that in each case the distribution of mutant p53 mRNA coincided with that of immunohistochemical overexpression of p53 protein. Our results suggest that the regulation of mutant p53 expression, but not the genotype, is heterogeneous in the neoplastic cells. The topographic genomapping of p53 in NSCLC using in situ PCR provides a novel approach to view molecular mechanisms of lung carcinogenesis.

p53-regulated GML gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer. a promising relationship to cisplatin chemosensitivity

The GML gene (glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored molecule-like protein gene) is a novel gene specifically induced by wild-type p53, which may participate in cell cycle control or the cell apoptotic pathway. Recent experiments suggest that the expression of this novel gene in cancer cells is closely associated with sensitivity to certain anticancer drugs. To elucidate the role of the gene expression in cisplatin (CDDP) chemosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 30 surgically resected materials were examined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). GML gene expression was detected in 9 (30%) samples. Its incidence was significantly higher in immunohistochemically p53-negative (P=0.040) or wild-type p53 tissues (P=0.041). On in vitro chemosensitivity testing using 29 primary tissues, six samples with GML gene expression showed good sensitivity to CDDP. In particular, in tissues with immunohistochemically p53-negative accumulation, those with GML gene expression showed significantly better in vitro sensitivity to CDDP (P=0.012). Clinically a good response to CDDP-based chemo(thermo)therapy for NSCLC patients with tumour residue or recurrence, was observed only in those with p53-negative accumulation and GML gene expression, in agreement with in vitro results. Thus, although the number of tested samples was small, GML gene expression is commonly detected in immunohistochemically p53-negative NSCLCs in close association with good sensitivity to CDDP. GML gene expression analysis may serve as a predictor of CDDP-based chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC.

Review of the efficacy of individualized chemotherapy selected by in vitro drug sensitivity testing for patients with cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to review the potential efficacy of individualized chemotherapy selected by in vitro drug sensitivity testing (DST) compared with empiric regimens for patients with cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE and CANCERLIT were searched for articles published (in English) about prospective clinical trials in which patients were treated with chemotherapy that was selected with the use of in vitro DST.

RESULTS

We identified 12 prospective studies that examined the benefit of chemotherapy selected by DST. Five hundred six patients (33%) were treated with chemotherapy that was selected with the use of in vitro DST. The mean response rate for patients treated with in vitro-selected therapy was 27% (range, 10% to 100%; n = 12 studies) compared with 18% (range, 0% to 100%; n = 7 studies) for patients treated with empiric therapy. Five studies (only one randomized) evaluated the impact of chemotherapy selected by in vitro DST on patient survival. Three studies showed that survival was 1 to 4 months longer for the 238 patients treated with empiric chemotherapy compared with that of the 65 patients treated with chemotherapy that was selected by in vitro testing. Two nonrandomized studies showed that survival was 4 or 19 months longer for 27 patients treated with chemotherapy selected by in vitro testing compared with that of 80 patients who were treated with empiric chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Only one third of patients entered in prospective trials of in vitro DST were actually treated with an in vitro best regimen. The response rates seem to be better with in vitro selected chemotherapy regimens than with empiric regimens, but the impact on survival has not been adequately addressed.

Immunohistochemical p53 protein status in nonsmall cell lung cancer is a promising indicator in determining in vitro chemosensitivity to some anticancer drugs

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The tumor suppressor oncogene p53 abnormalities have been closely associated with resistance or sensitivity of cancer cells to some chemotherapeutic agents. We examined the association between p53 protein status in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in vitro chemosensitivity to several chemotherapeutic agents.

METHODS

Using 146 surgically resected specimens of NSCLC, p53 status was immunohistochemically evaluated, and in vitro chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), cisplatin (CDDP), mitomycin C (MMC), etoposide (VP-16), doxorubicin hydrochloride (ADM), and vindesine sulfate (VDS) was examined by a collagen gel-droplet embedded culture drug sensitivity test (CD-DST, Int J Oncol, 1997;11:449).

RESULTS

Sixty-five of 146 materials (45%) showed immunohistochemically abnormal p53 protein accumulation in >10% of cancer cells within the tumor tissue, being regarded as p53+, whereas 81 (55%) were to p53-, in which no or less than 10% positive immunostaining cancer cells were detected. By CD-DST, the incidence of chemosensitive, borderline, and resistant p53- materials (N=81) to 5-Fu was 37%(N=30), 14%(N=11), and 49%(N=40), whereas that of p53+ materials (N=65) was 20%(N=13), 6%(N=4), and 74%(N=48), respectively, showing that p53- materials were significantly more sensitive to 5-Fu than p53+ materials (P=0.011), especially in the adenocarcinoma type. As similar borderline association between p53 protein status and in vitro chemosensitivity was also shown in ADM (P=0.078), but not in other chemoagents.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemically detected p53 protein status in NSCLC patients may be a promising indicator in determining in vitro chemosensitivity to some anticancer drugs, especially 5-Fu and ADM.