Analysis of copy number variation by sequencing in fetuses with nuchal translucency thickening

Prenatal Diagnosis by Trio Clinical Exome Sequencing: Single Center Experience

Fetal anomalies, characterized by structural or functional abnormalities occurring during intrauterine life, pose a significant medical challenge, with a notable prevalence, affecting approximately 2-3% of live births and 20% of spontaneous miscarriages. This study aims to identify the genetic cause of ultrasound anomalies through clinical exome sequencing (CES) analysis. The focus is on utilizing CES analysis in a trio setting, involving the fetuses and both parents. To achieve this objective, prenatal trio clinical exome sequencing was conducted in 51 fetuseses exhibiting ultrasound anomalies with previously negative results from chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis. The study revealed pathogenic variants in 24% of the analyzed cases (12 out of 51). It is worth noting that the findings include de novo variants in 50% of cases and the transmission of causative variants from asymptomatic parents in 50% of cases. Trio clinical exome sequencing stands out as a crucial tool in advancing prenatal diagnostics, surpassing the effectiveness of relying solely on chromosomal microarray analysis. This underscores its potential to become a routine diagnostic standard in prenatal care, particularly for cases involving ultrasound anomalies.

Associations between genomic aberrations, increased nuchal translucency, and pregnancy outcomes: a comprehensive analysis of 2,272 singleton pregnancies in women under 35

Objectives

Regarding increased nuchal translucency (NT), the cutoff values used are heterogeneous in clinical practice, this study aims to assess the efficacy of prenatal detection for chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes in fetuses with varying NT thicknesses, in order to provide data that supports informed prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling for such cases.

Methods

We included 2,272 pregnant women under 35 with singleton pregnancies who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis between 2014 and 2022. The cohort comprised 2,010 fetuses with increased NT (≥2.5 mm) and 262 fetuses with normal NT but exhibiting a single soft marker. Prenatal diagnoses were supported by chromosomal microarray (CMA) and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) analyses.

Results

The detection rates of numerical chromosomal abnormalities were 15.4% (309/2,010) and 17.3% (297/1,717) in the NT ≥2.5 and ≥ 3.0 groups, respectively. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNV incidence increased with NT thickness (χ2 = 8.60, p < 0.05), peaking at 8.7% (22/254) in the NT 4.5-5.4 mm group. Structural defects were found in 18.4% of fetuses with NT values between 2.5 mm and 2.9 mm. Chromosomal abnormality rates in the isolated increased NT groups of 2.5-2.9 mm and 3.0-3.4 mm were 6.7% (16/239) and 10.0% (47/470), respectively, with no statistical significance (χ2 = 2.14, p > 0.05). Fetuses with NT thickness between 2.5 and 2.9 mm combined with the presence of soft markers or non-lethal structural abnormalities exhibited a significantly higher chromosomal abnormality risk (19.0%) compared to fetuses with isolated increased NT ranging from 3.5 to 4.4 mm (13.0%). Pregnancy termination rates increased with NT thickness (χ2 = 435.18, p < 0.0001), ranging from 12.0% (30/249) in the NT 2.5-2.9 mm group to 87.0% (141/162) in the NT ≥ 6.5 mm group.

Conclusion

CMA or CNV-seq exhibited good performance in identifying genomic aberrations in pregnancies with increased NT thickness. NT ranging from 2.5 mm to 2.9 mm elevated the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities, particularly when combined with other soft markers.

Diagnostic yield of copy number variation sequencing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and karyotyping for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.

METHODS

Amniotic fluid samples were extracted from 205 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT ≥ 2.5 mm), diagnosed by ultrasound between gestational ages of 11 and 13 + 6 weeks. Karyotyping and CNV-seq were performed for detecting chromosomal abnormalities.

RESULTS

There are 40 fetuses (19.51%) showing increased NT detected with chromosomal abnormalities in karyotyping, and trisomy 21 was found to be the most common abnormalities. There are 50 fetuses (24.39%) identified with chromosomal abnormalities by CNV-seq. The detection of the applied techniques indicated that CNV-seq revealed higher chromosomal aberrations. The risk of chromosomal abnormalities was significantly increased with NT thickening, from 13.64% in the NT group of 2.5-3.4 mm, 38.64% in the NT group of 3.5-4.4 mm, and to 51.72% in the NT group of over 4.5 mm (P < 0.05). The investigated cases with increased NT with presence of soft markers in ultrasound or high risk in non-invasive prenatal testing presented chromosomal abnormalities in higher rates, comparing with those with isolated NT or low risk (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the risk of chromosomal abnormalities was associated with the NT thickness, detected by karyotype or CNV-seq. The combination application of two analysis was efficient to reveal the possible genetic defects in prenatal diagnosis. The finding suggested that the detection should be considered with ultrasonographic soft markers, and the NT thickness of 2.5-3.4 mm could be a critical value for detecting chromosomal abnormalities to prevent the occurrence of missed diagnosis.

Additional diagnostic value of CNV-seq over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the additional diagnostic value of CNV-seq over conventional karyotyping on the part of chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis.

METHOD

This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA criteria. In order to clarify related research, PubMed, Web of Science databases (including Core Collection, BIOSIS Previews, MEDLINE, and so on), The Cochrane Library and Wiley Online Library were searched with the terms: "prenatal diagnosis," "CNV-seq," "karyotyping," published from January 2010 to May 2022. No language restrictions. RenMan 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this systemic review and meta-analysis, including 11 091 pregnant women with high-risk pregnancy factors or with structurally abnormal fetus under ultrasound. CNV-seq detected a 2% (95% CI, -0% to 4%) additional chromosomal anomalies over conventional karyotyping in the six series. A 4% (95% CI, 3%-6%) pooled mean incremental yield of pathogenic CNVs by CNV-seq over karyotyping was observed, with a 1%-16% range.

CONCLUSION

CNV-seq, applied in prenatal diagnosis, may detect more chromosomal abnormalities when compared with karyotyping. With the advantages of wide coverage, high throughput, high resolution, no culture, good compatibility, and adjustable sequencing depth, CNV-seq has high application value in prenatal diagnosis.

Comparison of the combined use of CNV-seq and karyotyping or QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis: a retrospective study

To elevate the accuracy of diagnostic results, CNV-seq is usually performed simultaneously with karyotyping or QF-PCR. Although several studies have investigated the performance of the combined use of CNV-seq with karyotyping or QF-PCR, there have been no reports focusing on the comparison of these 2 diagnostic strategies. In our study, 2507 pregnant women were included to investigate these 2 strategies. The detection rates of foetal genetic abnormalities and turnaround time were compared between these 2 groups. Moreover, the detection rates of foetal genetic abnormalities in different indications were analyzed. Our results unveiled that the detection rates of numerical chromosomal abnormalities were nearly the same in these 2 groups. In addition to numerical chromosomal abnormalities, 39 balanced karyotypic changes and chromosome polymorphisms were detected via the combined use of karyotyping and CNV-seq. Further investigation revealed that the vast majority of these karyotypic changes were inherited from parents. Compared with the karyotyping group, the combination of QF-PCR and CNV-seq reduced the reporting time from 31.593 ± 4.944 days to 11.460 ± 4.894 days. Meanwhile, NIPT, maternal serum screening and ultrasound scan significantly improved the detection of foetal genetic abnormalities. In conclusion, our results revealed that parental karyotyping is a useful supplementary method for CNV-seq and systematic prenatal examinations improved the detection of foetal genetic defects.

A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series

Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic hygroma. The prenatal detection of these findings should prompt an accurate assessment through genetic counseling and testing, including karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and multigene RASopathy panel. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, to calculate diagnostic yields of genetic testing in fetuses with iNT and cystic hygroma. We compared the results with a cohort of 96 fetuses with these isolated findings. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 2.5 mm showed karyotype anomalies in 22.76% of cases and CMA presented an incremental detection rate of 2.35%. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 3 mm presented aneuploidies in 14.36% of cases and CMA had an incremental detection rate of 3.89%. When the isolated NT measured at least 3.5 mm the diagnostic yield of karyotyping was 34.35%, the incremental CMA detection rate was 4.1%, the incremental diagnostic rate of the RASopathy panel was 1.44% and it was 2.44% for exome sequencing. Interestingly, CMA presents a considerable diagnostic yield in the group of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Similarly, exome sequencing appears to show promising results and could be considered after a negative CMA result.

Does isolated nuchal translucency from 2.5 to 2.9 mm increase the risk of fetal chromosome disease?

Increased fetal nuchal translucency (NT) is a common ultrasonic manifestation during pregnancy. Many studies have confirmed that NT ≥ 3 mm is a high risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. However, when NT is between 2.5 and 2.9 mm, will it increase the risk of fetal chromosome abnormalities and other diseases? What is the most appropriate method for prenatal chromosome evaluation? At present, it has not been widely reported in the literature, and the conclusion is also controversial. This prospective cohort study included fetal samples from women who underwent amniocentesis from 2017 to 2020. The samples of the experimental group were fetuses with NT ≥ 2.5 mm at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation, with or without ultrasonographic anomaly. The control group contained fetal NT < 2.5 mm without ultrasonographic anomalies. All amniotic fluid samples were tested by copy number variants sequencing. In 262 fetal samples with isolated NT from 2.5 to 2.9 mm, the detection rate of aneuploidy was 3.4% (9/262), and the risk of aneuploidy was significantly higher than that of the control group (1.4%, 32/2331) (relative risk 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.2). The detection rates of other pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variants in the two groups were 0.8% (2/262) and 1.3% (31/2331), respectively, which was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.6, 95% CI 0.1-2.4). Our results showed that isolated NT from 2.5 to 2.9 mm increased the risk of fetal chromosome aneuploidy. Therefore, noninvasive prenatal screening is recommended as the first choice for prenatal chromosome evaluation in this population.

Application of expanded noninvasive prenatal test in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficiency of the upgraded noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT-Plus) in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT).

METHODS

Fetuses with an increased NT at or above 2.5 mm were selected for prenatal diagnosis. Amniotic fluid was collected from all cases for karyotype analysis and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), and cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood was tested using Noninvasive Prenatal Test (NIPT-Plus) before amniocentesis in some cases. The results of amniocentesis with different NT thicknesses were analyzed and compared with those of NIPT-Plus.

RESULTS

A total of 125 eligible patients were divided into group A (2.5 mm ≤ NT < 3.0 mm) and group B (NT ≥ 3.0 mm). In group A, the detection rate of chromosomal aneuploidy and pathogenic copy number variation (CNV) was 10.6% and 6.4%, respectively. The total chromosome abnormality rate in group B (34.7%) was significantly higher than that in group A (17%). In 72 patients who underwent NIPT-Plus and amniocentesis, chromosomal aneuploidy accounted for 80.8% of the total chromosomal abnormalities. Among 21 cases of chromosomal aneuploidy, NIPT-Plus detected 20 cases. The sensitivity and specificity of NIPT-Plus toward aneuploidy detection were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. Among the five cases of pathogenic CNV, only two were detected using NIPT-Plus.

CONCLUSION

NIPT-plus is recommended as the first choice for fetal diagnosis in pregnant women with 2.5 mm ≤ NT < 3.0 mm who do not accept invasive prenatal diagnosis. When NT ≥ 3.0 mm and NIPT-Plus detects chromosomal aneuploidy, a rapid prenatal diagnosis can be performed through amniocentesis. In cases where NIPT-Plus yields negative results, amniocentesis still needs to be performed to detect chromosome microdeletions/duplications in order to avoid a missed diagnosis.

Copy number variation characterization and possible candidate genes in miscarriage and stillbirth by next-generation sequencing analysis

Background

The present study aimed to explore the etiological relationship between miscarriage and stillbirth and copy number variations (CNVs), as well as provide useful genetic guidance for high‐risk pregnancy.

Methods

In total, 659 fetal samples were recruited and subjected to DNA extraction and CNV sequencing (CNV‐seq), relevant medical records were collected.

Results

There were 322 cases (48.86%) with chromosomal abnormalities, including 230 with numerical abnormalities and 92 with structural abnormalities. Chromosomal monosomy variations mainly occurred on sex chromosomes and trisomy variations mainly occurred on chromosomes 16, 22, 21, 18, 13 and 15. In total, 41 pathogenic CNVs (23 microdeletions and 18 microduplications) were detected in 27 fetal tissues. The rates of numerical chromosomal abnormalities were 29.30% (109/372), 32.39% (57/176) and 57.66% (64/111) in < 30‐year‐old, 30–34‐year‐old and ≥ 35‐year‐old age pregnant women, respectively, and increased with an increasing age (p < 0.001). There was statistically significant difference (χ² = 7.595, p = 0.022) in the rates of structural chromosomal abnormalities in these groups (13.71%, 18.75% and 7.21%, respectively). The rates of numerical chromosomal abnormalities were 45.44% (219/482), 7.80% (11/141) and 0% (0/36) in the ≤ 13 gestational weeks, 14–27 weeks and ≥ 28 weeks groups, respectively, and decreased with respect to the increasing gestational age of the fetuses (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The present study has obtained useful and accurate genetic etiology information that will provide useful genetic guidance for high‐risk pregnancies.

Analysis of copy number variation by sequencing in fetuses with nuchal translucency thickening

Objective

Copy number variation sequencing (CNV‐seq) technique was used to analyze the genetic etiology of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT).

Methods

A total of 139 women with gestational 11‐14 weeks whose fetuses were detected with increased NT (NT ≥ 2.5 mm) in our hospital from July 2016 to December 2018 were selected. Fetal specimens were performed for karyotyping analysis and CNV sequencing.

Results

According to the nuchal translucency thickness, 2.5‐3.4, 3.5‐4.4, 4.5‐5.4, and more than 5.5 mm, the rates of chromosomal abnormalities were 22.8% (13/57), 30.8% (12/39), 42.1% (8/19), and 62.5% (15/24), respectively. There was significant difference among the incidences of chromosomal abnormalities in four groups (χ² = 37.69, P < .01) and the incidences increased with fetal NT thickness. Among 139 cases, there were 36 cases (25.9%) with abnormal chromosome karyotypes. Meanwhile, there were 45 cases (32.3%) with abnormal CNV. In the 12 cases with abnormal CNV and normal chromosome karyotypes, there were 2 cases of pathogenic CNV, 7 cases of CNV with unknown clinical significance, and 3 cases of possibly benign CNV. There was no significant difference in CNV between pregnant women in advanced maternal age and those in normal maternal age (χ² = 1.389, P = .239). In the fetus who showed abnormalities in NT and ultrasonography (χ² = 5.13, P < .05) and the fetus aborted (χ² = 113.19, P < .05), the abnormal rate of CNV was higher with statistically significant difference.

Conclusion

CNV‐seq combined karyotype analysis should be performed simultaneously in fetuses with increased NT, providing a basis for genetic counseling, which is of great significance for prenatal diagnosis.