Drug Interactions with a Short Course of Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir: Prescribers and Patients Beware

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nirmatrelvir in Chinese patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of nirmatrelvir (NMV) are unknown in Chinese patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To understand the PK, as well as PK-PD characteristics of NMV for optimizing the dose in Chinese patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

We enrolled 141 participants who received NMV 300 mg/ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg b.i.d. for 5 days. The NMV concentrations were analyzed using 251 blood samples. PK/PD of NMV was investigated in these COVID-19 patients using a nonlinear mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

The patients had a mean age of 82 years (range, 34-97). The absorption rate constant and apparent clearance of NMV in this Chinese cohort were 0.253 h-1 and 6.83 L/h, respectively, similar to Caucasian patients. No covariates affected NMV clearance. Predicted peak (Cmax) and trough concentration (Cmin) under 300 mg NMV/100 mg RTV b.i.d. were 4004 and 1498 ng/mL, respectively. Although higher AUC and Cmin were weakly associated with a slight increase in the number of cycle threshold (CT) of viral genes, no significant correlation was found, indicating a weak relationship between drug exposure and efficacy (CT).

CONCLUSIONS

In all, our findings suggest no ethnic PK differences, a weak and clinically insignificant relationship between drug exposure and efficacy, suitable dosage for Chinese patients (including the elderly) based on PK parameters, and the need for further studies to determine optimal regimens for high-risk patients due to inter-individual variability.

The effects of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on tacrolimus levels in lung transplant recipients: A single-center study

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) have a higher risk of hospitalization and mortality due to COVID-19 compared with the immunocompetent population. The use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR), an effective oral treatment for COVID-19, is quite challenging due to its potent drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressants and azole antifungals. As there are few clinical reports of the use of NR in LTRs, we measured tacrolimus levels in patients receiving NR in our hospital to improve safety when prescribing NR.

METHODS

In total, 48 adult LTRs who received NR between November 19, 2022, and January 19, 2023, at China-Japan Friendship Hospital were retrospectively included and followed for 20 days after initiating NR. Tacrolimus was held at least 12 h before initiating NR and re-administered based on the trough levels after completing NR treatment. All concomitant medications, drug concentrations, laboratory results, and genotypes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Most patients showed stable tacrolimus trough levels despite high individual variability. Four patients exhibited supratherapeutic trough levels of tacrolimus (more than 15 ng/mL). Two patients who received 0.5 mg of tacrolimus during NR treatment had trough levels below 3.0 ng/mL. In addition, we found that in 13 patients, the trough levels were 130% of baseline after cessation of tacrolimus, and logistic regression revealed that increased trough level was significantly associated with age more than 60 years.

CONCLUSIONS

NR can be safely used in LTRs with close monitoring of tacrolimus levels and appropriate dose adjustments. However, more attention should be paid to elderly patients, as NR may more severely affect their drug metabolism. Due to the limited sample size, further studies are needed to guide the optimal use of tacrolimus following treatment with NR and explore the risk factors significantly affecting the interactions between NR and tacrolimus.

Drug Interaction Between Tacrolimus and Paxlovid (Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir) in an Adolescent with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) led to a worldwide pandemic. The emergency use of a combination of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (paxlovid) was approved for high-risk individuals (such as immunocompromised) testing positive for the disease. We present a patient with ulcerative colitis being treated with tacrolimus, as well as ustekinumab, who was diagnosed with COVID-19 and placed on paxlovid due to her immunosuppressed state. She stopped her tacrolimus while on paxlovid and did well clinically. Tacrolimus was restarted 12 hours after completion of paxlovid, but she became symptomatic with vomiting, headache, and malaise and was found to have a toxic tacrolimus level. Tacrolimus was stopped and symptoms resolved, but levels remained elevated for a prolonged period. There is a paucity of literature on this drug-drug interaction, and with the resurgence of COVID-19, it is important to be cognizant of the potential for adverse effects and toxicity.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling-Guided Dose Management of Oral Anticoagulants when Initiating Paxlovid for COVID-19 Treatment

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) with cardiovascular diseases who are at higher risk of progressing to critical illness should be treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid). Ritonavir, the booster in nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, modulates multiple drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters, complicating its use in real‐world clinics. We aimed to apply physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to simulate the complex drug–drug interactions (DDIs) of ritonavir with two anticoagulants, rivaroxaban and racemic warfarin, to address this important clinical conundrum. Simulations were implemented within Simcyp Simulator. Compound and population models were adopted from Simcyp and our previous studies. Upon verification and validation of the PBPK model of ritonavir, prospective DDI simulations with the anticoagulants were performed in both the general population (20–65 years) and geriatric subjects (65–85 years) with or without moderate renal impairment. Elevated rivaroxaban concentrations were simulated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, where the impact was more profound among geriatric subjects with renal impairment. The overexposure of rivaroxaban was restored to normal range on day 4 post‐discontinuation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, corroborating with the recovery of enzyme activity. A lower 10 mg daily dose of rivaroxaban could effectively maintain acceptable systemic exposure of rivaroxaban during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. Treatment of ritonavir marginally declined simulated S‐warfarin concentrations, but substantially elevated that of R‐warfarin, resulting in a decrease in the international normalized ratio (INR). As INR only recovered 2 weeks post‐nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, a longer surveillance INR for warfarin becomes important. Our PBPK‐guided simulations evaluated clinically important yet untested DDIs and supports clinical studies to ensure proper anticoagulation management of patients with COVID‐19 with chronic coagulative abnormalities when initiating nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy.