Weight loss over time and survival: a landmark analysis of 1000+ prospectively treated and monitored lung cancer patients

Diversity in chemotherapy-induced cachexia

Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that chronic administration of cytotoxic drugs (e.g., chemotherapy) may contribute to the occurrence of skeletal muscle wasting and weakness/fatigue (i.e., cachexia). Doxorubicin, folfiri, and cisplatin are known to promote cachexia by triggering common alterations such as skeletal muscle atrophy, protein breakdown, and mitochondrial dysfunction, whereas each also possesses distinguishing features in terms of the activated molecular pathways. Similarly, commonalities exist between different cancer types including the development of muscle wasting early in treatment that can persist for years. The impact of treatment for gastrointestinal, head and neck, and nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) on the development of cachexia and survival outcomes is well documented. However, a disconnect occurs between preclinical studies on cachexia, which are often performed on younger mice, and clinical studies on cachexia, which are focused on patients over 60 yr old. Yet, several preclinical studies have examined the impact of age on chemotherapy-induced cachexia. Finally, sex differences have been identified in both preclinical and clinical studies focused on the onset of cachexia consequential to chemotherapy administration and raise the question of whether treatments for this condition should be based on sex specificities. In conclusion, although cancer cachexia has been widely studied for its impact on patients affected by various malignancies, the effects of chemotherapy on the development of cachexia are less explored. Here, we examine diversity in chemotherapy-induced cachexia with respect to specific types of chemotherapy regimens and cancer, and differences based on age and sex.

Frequency of weight and body composition increases in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients during first line therapy

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study was to assess the frequency of body composition increases and their relationships to changes in body weight in two cohorts of real world, treatment-naïve, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. One cohort received the current standard of care (CSOC), which consisted of immunotherapy and newer chemotherapy regimens, and the other cohort was treated with the former standard of care (FSOC), consisting only of older platinum-containing regimens.

METHODS

CSOC (n = 106) and FSOC (n = 88) cohorts of advanced NSCLC patients were included in this study. Weights were collected at each clinical visit, and body composition analysis from routine chest computed tomography via automated segmentation software assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks. Standard statistical methods were used to calculate relationships between changes in weight and in body composition.

RESULTS

The CSOC cohort contained 106 stage IV NSCLC patients treated between 16/12/2014 and 22/10/2020 while the FSOC cohort contained 88 stage III/IV NSCLC patients treated between 16/6/2006 and 18/11/2014. While each cohort exhibited decreases in median weight, body mass index (BMI), mean skeletal muscle index (SMI) and subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI) at the 6 and 12 week time points, a subset of patients experienced increases in these parameters. Using a threshold of ≥2.5% increase for weight, BMI, SMI, and SATI at the 12 week time point, both cohorts showed similar (20.5% and 27.3%) increases in these parameters. With a cut point of ≥5% increase at 12 weeks follow-up, 8.0% to 25.0% of the patients gained ≥5% in weight, BMI, SMI and SATI. Comparing these results in each cohort showed no significant differences. Pearson coefficients for weight change related to changes in SMI and SATI at 6 and 12 weeks ranged from 0.31 to 0.58 with all P values <0.02. Pearson coefficients for weight change at 12 weeks related to changes in VATI and IMATI ranged from 0.26 to 0.47 with all P values <0.05. Comparison of Pearson coefficients for each cohort showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Although decreases in median weight, BMI, SMI and SATI were observed in both cohorts, similar percentage of patients in each cohort experienced increases in these parameters. These findings, plus the positive correlations between longitudinal measurements of weight, muscle mass and adipose tissue, indicate that weight gain in these patients involves increases in both muscle mass and adipose tissue. Upon validation, these findings could have implications for clinical trial design and for translational research in cancer cachexia.

Exploring the Relationship Between Dietary Phytochemical Index and Chemotherapy-Related Symptoms: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study

Phytochemicals may confer substantial benefits in alleviating chemotherapy-related symptoms. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the role of dietary phytochemicals on treatment-related symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy. Data including demographic variables, anthropometric measures such as weight and height, 3-day food record, and Nightingale Symptom Assessment Scale (N-SAS), a composite measure of patients' chemotherapy-related symptoms, were gathered via face-to-face interviews. The dietary phytochemical index (DPI) was computed based on the patient's food records and presented by dividing into quartiles. The study included 152 participants with a mean age of 59.59 ± 13.19 years. The mean N-SAS score was 2.16 ± 0.80. The average DPI score for the entire group was 24.66 ± 6.55, significantly higher in women (26.61 ± 6.06) than men (23.05 ± 6.54) (p = 0.001). As the DPI quartile values increased, there was a statistically significant decrease in N-SAS scores (p = 0.002). A significantly negative correlation was found between the N-SAS score and DPI, as well as all cancers (r = -0.364; p < 0.001). Additionally, a negative correlation was observed between the N-SAS score and specific cancer types, comprising lung cancer (r = -0.513; p = 0.005), breast cancer (r = -0.612; p < 0.001), and gastrointestinal system (GIS) cancer (r = -0.329; p = 0.033). Increasing dietary phytochemicals in chemotherapy patients may help manage treatment-related symptoms. Phytochemicals may confer substantial benefits in alleviating chemotherapy-related symptoms. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the role of dietary phytochemicals on cancer-related symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy. A significantly negative correlation was found between N-SAS score and DPI and all cancers (r = -0.364; p < 0.001) and different cancer types such as lung (r = -0.513; p = 0.005), breast (r = -0.612; p < 0.001), and GIS (r = -0.329; p = 0.033). As a result, increasing dietary phytochemicals in chemotherapy patients may help manage treatment-related symptoms.

The relationship between weight gain during chemotherapy and outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This post hoc, pooled analysis examined the relationship between different weight gain categories and overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Data were pooled from the control arms of three phase III clinical studies (NCT00596830, NCT00254891, and NCT00254904), and the maximum weight gain in the first 3 months from treatment initiation was categorised as >0%, >2.5%, and >5.0%. Cox proportional hazard modelling of OS was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for each category, including baseline covariates, time to weight gain, and time to confirmed objective response (RECIST Version 1.0).

RESULTS

Of 1030 patients with advanced NSCLC (IIIB 11.5% and IV 88.5%), 453 (44.0%), 252 (24.5%), and 120 (11.7%) experienced weight gain from baseline of >0%, >2.5%, and >5.0%, respectively. The median time to weight gain was 23 (>0%), 43 (>2.5%), and 45 (>5.0%) days. After adjusting for a time-dependent confirmed objective response, the risk of death was reduced for patients with any weight gain (>0% vs. ≤0% [HR 0.71; 95% confidence interval-CI 0.61, 0.82], >2.5% vs. ≤2.5% [HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64, 0.91] and >5.0% vs. ≤5.0% [HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60, 0.99]). The median OS was 13.5 versus 8.6 months (weight gain >0% vs. ≤0%), 14.4 versus 9.4 months (weight gain >2.5% vs. ≤2.5%), and 13.4 versus 10.2 months (weight gain >5.0% vs. ≤5.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight gain during treatment was associated with a reduced risk of death, independent of tumour response. The survival benefit was comparable for weight gain >0%, >2.5%, and >5.0%, suggesting that any weight gain may be an early predictor of survival with implications for the design of interventional cancer cachexia studies.

"It gave me a sense of achievement and a sense of purpose"-a qualitative study of patient experiences of a virtually supervised exercise program for adults with advanced cancer and cachexia

People with advanced cancer and cachexia experience significant body weight loss, adversely impacting physical function and quality of life (QOL). Effective, evidence-based treatments for cancer cachexia are lacking, leaving patients with unmet needs. Exercise holds promise to improve patient QOL. However, information on patients' experiences of exercise, including their ability to cope with structured exercise, is limited.

PURPOSE

To explore patient experiences completing a structured, supervised exercise program for people with cachexia due to advanced cancer.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants enrolled in a phase II feasibility, randomized controlled trial to explore their experiences of an 8-week virtually supervised exercise program delivered via videoconference technology. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Seventeen participants completed interviews (female n = 9, 53%). Main interview themes included the following: (1) Deciding to exercise involves balancing concerns and expectations, (2) the exercise program is a positive experience, and (3) moving forward after the exercise program. While some participants initially held doubts about their physical capabilities and exercise safety, most wanted to exercise to enhance their wellbeing. Participants described the exercise program as a positive experience, offering diverse benefits. Some would have preferred in-person exercise, but all agreed the virtual format increased convenience. Participants emphasized the need to recommend the program to others in similar circumstances. They underscored the necessity and desire for ongoing support to sustain their new exercise habits.

CONCLUSION

Based on patient experiences, virtually supervised exercise programming appears to be feasible and meaningful to people with advanced cancer and cachexia.

High Protein Oral Nutritional Supplements Enable the Majority of Cancer Patients to Meet Protein Intake Recommendations during Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatment: A Randomised Controlled Parallel-Group Study

ESPEN guidelines recommend a minimum protein intake of 1.0 g/kg body weight (BW) per day to maintain or restore lean body mass in patients with cancer. During anti-cancer treatment, optimal protein intake is difficult to achieve. We investigated whether a high-protein, low-volume oral nutritional supplement (ONS) supports patients in meeting recommendations. A multi-centre, randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study was carried out in nine hospitals (five countries) between January 2019 and July 2021 in colorectal and lung cancer patients undergoing first-line systemic treatment with chemo(radio-) or immunotherapy. Subjects were randomised (2:1) to receive Fortimel Compact Protein® or standard care. Protein intake was assessed with a 3-day food diary (primary outcome). BW was a secondary outcome. Due to challenges in recruitment, the study was terminated prematurely with 42 patients randomised (intervention group (IG) 28; control group (CG) 14). At T1 and T2, protein intake was statistically significantly higher in the IG compared to the CG (1.40 vs. 1.07 g/kg/day at T1, p = 0.008; 1.32 vs. 0.94 g/kg/day at T2, p = 0.002). At baseline, only 65% (IG) and 45% (CG) of patients met ESPEN minimum protein intake recommendations. However, at T1 and T2 in the IG, a higher proportion of patients met recommendations than in the CG (88% vs. 55% and 40%). No statistically significant difference between study groups was observed for BW. Mean compliance to the ONS was 73.4%. A high-protein, low-volume ONS consumed twice daily enables the majority of patients to reach minimal ESPEN protein recommendations.

Development and applicability of modified weight loss grading system in cancer: a real-world cohort study

BACKGROUND

The original weight loss grading system (WLGS) was developed in western population, which did not perform effectively in cancer patients from China. This study aimed to develop and validate the modified WLGS (mWLGS) in the prognostic assessment of cancer patients in China.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre real-world cohort study involving 16 842 patients diagnosed with cancer was conducted. Cox regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios for overall survival. Logistic linear regression was used to assess the odds ratio for 90-day outcomes.

RESULTS

We calculated survival risks for the 25 mWLGS groups and clustered the approximate survival risks. Finally, we revised the prognostic grading system for mWLGS to include five grades of 0-4. Compared with the original WLGS, the mWLGS had a better prognostic differentiation effect in predicting the prognosis of patients with cancer. The survival rate gradually deteriorated with increasing grade of mWLGS, with the survival rate of grade 0 decreasing from 76.4% to 48.2% for grade 4 (76.4 vs. 72.8 vs. 66.1 vs. 57.0 vs. 48.2%, respectively). The mWLGS provides effective prognostic stratification for most site-specific cancers, especially lung and gastrointestinal cancers. High-grade mWLGS is independently associated with an increased risk of poor quality of life and adverse 90-day outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the mWLGS was an independent prognostic factor for cancer patients in the validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the original WLGS, the mWLGS can better stratify the prognosis of cancer patients. mWLGS is a useful tool for predicting survival, 90-day outcomes, and quality of life in patients with cancer. These analyses may provide new insights into the application of WLGS in cancer patients in China.

Gut microbiome and nutrition-related predictors of response to immunotherapy in cancer: making sense of the puzzle

The gut microbiome is emerging as an important predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for patients with cancer. However, several nutrition-related patient characteristics, which are themselves associated with changes in gut microbiome, are also prognostic markers for ICI treatment response and survival. Thus, increased abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila, Phascolarctobacterium, Bifidobacterium and Rothia in stool are consistently associated with better response to ICI treatment. A. muciniphila is also more abundant in stool in patients with higher muscle mass, and muscle mass is a strong positive prognostic marker in cancer, including after ICI treatment. This review explores the complex inter-relations between the gut microbiome, diet and patient nutritional status and the correlations with response to ICI treatment. Different multivariate approaches, including archetypal analysis, are discussed to help identify the combinations of features which may select patients most likely to respond to ICI treatment.

Why We Should Look at Dinner Plates: Diet Changes in Cancer Patients

Objective: Malnutrition is often underestimated in the context of cancer therapy: the dietary trends initiated by patients after diagnosis are usually neither known to nor evaluated by the medical staff. Here, we propose a combined screening instrument evaluating malnutrition and dietary trends. Methods: The validated screening tool NRS-2002 was combined with a four-item questionnaire assessing whether (1) patients preferred certain foods, (2) avoided certain foods, (3) used dietary supplements or followed a special diet since the time of cancer diagnosis. The screening tool was routinely used by cancer patients in the daily practice of three oncological departments. The presented analysis was performed retrospectively and anonymized. Results: Overall, 102 cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy (CP), 97 undergoing radiation therapy (RP), and 36 head–neck cancer patients (HNP) were screened. The CP cohort showed a higher rate of malnutrition (50.00%) than the HNP (28.13%) or RP (26.80%) cohort. Overall, diet changes were observed in 33.63% of all patients. Avoiding meat, stimulants, or hard and edgy food was often mentioned in free text answers, while patients reported a preference for fruit and vegetables. Nutritional supplements were used by 28.76% of the patients. While dietary changes were common, only 6.64% of the patients mentioned adhering to a specific cancer diet. Conclusion: Malnutrition is still underestimated nowadays. Diet trends, especially avoiding certain foods, are common in cancer patients, while adhering to a specific cancer diet is an exception. Diet trends should be assessed and addressed to avoid or aggravate malnutrition.

Changes in Body Weight, Body Composition, Phase Angle, and Resting Metabolic Rate in Male Patients with Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Therapy

Background and Objectives: Cancer treatments can adversely influence body weight status, body composition, phase angle (PhA), and resting metabolic rate (RMR), which could possibly affect disease course. Τhe aim was to assess differences in body composition, PhA, RMR, and related parameters in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after treatment. Methods: The sample consisted of 82 NSCLC (stage IV) male patients (chemotherapy (C) 15.7%; immunotherapy (I) 13.3%; C + I 25.3%; (C) + radiotherapy (R) 22.9 %; and other 15.5%). Body weight and body composition, PhA, RMR, oxygen consumption (VO2), ventilation rate, and diet were assessed at baseline and at 3 months after initiation of therapy. Results: Reductions in PhA, RMR, VO2, ventilation rate, and intracellular water were observed at follow up. Weight loss was evident for 45% of patients who also had a reduction in lean body mass. In the group under C, lean mass was reduced at follow up (55.3 ± 11.53 vs. 52.4 ± 12.6, p = 0.04) without significant weight changes. In subjects with a low adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDietScore < 30), RMR (1940 ± 485 vs. 1730 ± 338 Kcal, p = 0.001), VO2 (277.1 ± 70.2 vs. 247 ± 49.1 mL/min, p = 0.001), and ventilation rate (10.1 ± 2.28 vs. 9. ± 2 2.2 L/min, p = 0.03) were significantly reduced. The changes in body weight were positively related to % of change in fat mass (rho = 0.322, p = 0.003) and absolute lean mass change (rho = 0.534, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with % of change in total body water (rho = −0.314, p = 0.004) (Spearman correlation coefficients). Conclusions: In conclusion, cancer therapy related to reductions in PhA and RMR, while lean mass reduction may be related to the type of treatment. Our results emphasize the importance of a more holistic nutritional and body composition assessment beyond body weight, to better address patients’ needs in clinical practice.

Associations between body mass index, weight loss and overall survival in patients with advanced lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Weight loss (WL) has been associated with shorter survival in patients with advanced cancer, while obesity has been associated with longer survival. Integrating body mass index (BMI) and WL provides a powerful prognostic tool but has not been well-studied in lung cancer patients, particularly in the setting of clinical trials.

METHODS

We analysed patient data (n = 10 128) from 63 National Cancer Institute sponsored advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) trials. Risk matrices were created using BMI and WL percentage, which were divided into 'grades' based on median survival. Relationships between survival, BMI and WL percentage were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards (PH) models with restricted cubic splines.

RESULTS

For NSCLC, a twofold difference was noted in median survival between the BMI > 28 and WL ≤ 5% group (13.5 months) compared with the BMI < 20 and WL > 5% group (6.6 months). These associations were less pronounced in SCLC. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant survival differences between grades for both NSCLC and SCLC (log-rank, P < 0.0001). In Stage IV NSCLC, Cox PH analyses with restricted cubic splines demonstrated significant associations between BMI and survival in both WL ≤ 5% (P = 0.0004) and >5% (P = 0.0129) groups, as well as in WL > 5% in Stage III (P = 0.0306). In SCLC, these relationships were more complex.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI and WL have strong associations with overall survival in patients with advanced lung cancer, with a greater impact seen in NSCLC compared with SCLC. The integration of a BMI/WL grading scale may provide additional prognostic information and should be included in the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in future clinical trials in advanced lung cancer.

Malnutrition management in oncology: An expert view on controversial issues and future perspectives

Cancer and anticancer treatments can lead to several negative side effects, including malnutrition. Despite the recognized need for adequate nutritional support in cancer patients, in daily clinical practice, nutrition is still not considered one of the first aspects to be considered. Malnutrition negatively affects the clinical outcomes, treatment response, and overall survival of cancer patients. In this study, three of the most controversial issues related to malnutrition, which emerged during an Italian Consensus Conference, were addressed specifically for patients with head and neck as well as gastrointestinal cancer. The timing of nutritional evaluation and intervention, extension of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS^®) protocols, and cost-effectiveness of nutritional interventions have been considered. This study aimed to illustrate the state-of-the art of each issue and hypothesize future perspectives and actions to be taken, trying to suggest a new nutritional management model for cancer patients in Italy that overcomes the critical issues encountered. Of note, the timely diagnosis of nutritional issue appears to be essential to ensure the correct management of malnourished cancer patients as well as those who are at high risk of malnutrition. Standardized protocols, screening tests, and the inclusion of nutritional parameters in patient medical records would help to achieve good clinical outcomes. Finally, appropriate nutritional support is also associated with cost savings, and it seems necessary to promote its clinical and economic value to obtain improvements in both outcomes and management costs.

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index is the optimal inflammatory biomarker of overall survival in patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUNDS

Malnutrition and systemic inflammatory responses are associated with poor overall survival (OS) in lung cancer patients, but it remains unclear which biomarkers are better for predicting their prognosis. This study tried to determine the best one among the existing common nutrition/inflammation-based indicators of OS for patients with lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 16 nutrition or systemic inflammation-based indicators included in this study. The cut-off points for the indicators were calculated using maximally selected rank statistics. The OS was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the relationship between the indicators and OS. A time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (time-ROC) and C-index were calculated to assess the predictive ability of the different indicators.

RESULTS

There were 1772 patients with lung cancer included in this study. In univariate analysis, all 16 indicators were significantly associated with OS of the patients (all P < 0.001). Except for platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, all other indicators were independent predictors of OS in multivariate analysis (all P < 0.05). Low advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) was associated with higher mortality risk of lung cancer [hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13-1.49]. The results of the time-AUC and C-index analyses indicated that the ALI (C-index: 0.611) had the best predictive ability on the OS in patients with lung cancer. In different sub-groups, the ALI was the best indicator for predicting the OS of lung cancer patients regardless of sex (C-index, 0.609 for men and 0.613 for women) or smoking status (C-index, 0.629 for non-smoker and 0.601 for smoker) and in patients aged <65 years (C-index, 0.613). However, the modified Glasgow prognostic score was superior to the other indicators in non-small cell lung cancer patients (C-index, 0.639) or patients aged ≥65 years (C-index, 0.610), and the glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio performed better prognostic ability in patients with small cell lung cancer (C-index, 0.601).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic ability of the ALI is superior to the other inflammation/nutrition-based indicators for all patients with lung cancer.

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of anamorelin (ONO-7643) in patients with cancer cachexia and low body mass index

Background

Cancer cachexia is a syndrome characterized by anorexia and decreased body weight. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anamorelin, an orally active, selective ghrelin receptor agonist, in patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index (BMI).

Methods

This multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm study enrolled Japanese patients with non–small cell lung cancer or gastrointestinal cancer with cancer cachexia (BMI < 20 kg/m², involuntary weight loss > 2% in the last 6 months, and anorexia). Patients were administered 100 mg of anamorelin once daily for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was a composite clinical response (CCR) at 9 weeks, which was defined as an increase in body weight of ≥5% from the baseline, an increase of ≥2 points in the score of the 5‐item Anorexia Symptom Scale of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, and being alive.

Results

One hundred two patients were eligible and enrolled. The means and standard deviations for age and BMI were 71.0 ± 8.2 years and 17.47 ± 1.48 kg/m², respectively. The CCR rate at 9 weeks was 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.3%‐35.3%), which met the primary end point with a lower 95% CI exceeding the prespecified minimum of 8%. Improvements in body weight and anorexia were durable and were accompanied by improvements in patients' global impression of change for appetite/eating‐related symptoms and overall condition. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 37 of 101 treated patients (36.6%), with the most common being glycosylated hemoglobin increases, constipation, and peripheral edema.

Conclusions

Anamorelin improved body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms in patients with cancer cachexia and a low BMI with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability.

Lay Summary

Anamorelin is a drug that stimulates appetite and promotes weight gain.

This clinical trial was aimed at determining its efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients with a low body mass index and cachexia, a syndrome associated with anorexia and weight loss.

Anamorelin was found to improve body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms in these patients, and these effects were durable for up to 24 weeks. Moreover, anamorelin was generally well tolerated.

These findings suggest that anamorelin is a valuable treatment option for patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index.

This single‐arm trial is aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in Japanese patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index. Anamorelin improves body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability.

Postdiagnosis BMI Change Is Associated with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival

BACKGROUND

Body mass index (BMI) change after a lung cancer diagnosis has been associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival. This study aimed to quantify the association based on a large-scale observational study.

METHODS

Included in the study were 7,547 patients with NSCLC with prospectively collected BMI data from Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent covariates was used to estimate effect of time-varying postdiagnosis BMI change rate (% per month) on overall survival (OS), stratified by clinical subgroups. Spline analysis was conducted to quantify the nonlinear association. A Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis with a total of 3,495 patients further validated the association.

RESULTS

There was a J-shape association between postdiagnosis BMI change and OS among patients with NSCLC. Specifically, a moderate BMI decrease [0.5-2.0; HR = 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.25-2.67] and large BMI decrease (≥2.0; HR = 4.65; 95% CI, 4.15-5.20) were strongly associated with worse OS, whereas moderate weight gain (0.5-2.0) reduced the risk for mortality (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89) and large weight gain (≥2.0) slightly increased the risk of mortality without reaching statistical significance (HR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.42). MR analyses supported the potential causal roles of postdiagnosis BMI change in survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that BMI change after diagnosis was associated with mortality risk.

IMPACT

Our findings, which reinforce the importance of postdiagnosis BMI surveillance, suggest that weight loss or large weight gain may be unwarranted.

Impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcome of combined chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Although previous studies suggest that cancer cachexia is a poor prognostic factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, the impact of cancer cachexia on chemoimmunotherapy is unclear. We investigated the impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively analyzed patients' medical records with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy in 12 institutions in Japan between January and November 2019. We defined cancer cachexia as weight loss exceeding 5% of the total body weight or a body mass index of < 20 kg/m2 and weight loss of more than 2% of the total body weight within 6 months before chemoimmunotherapy initiation, with laboratory results exceeding reference values. This study enrolled 235 patients with NSCLC, among whom 196 were eligible for analysis, and 50 (25.5%) met the criteria for cachexia diagnosis. Patients with cancer cachexia had a significantly higher frequency of a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥ 50% (48%, p = .01) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS; log-rank test: p = .04) than patients without cachexia. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the cachexia and no-cachexia groups (log-rank test: p = .14). In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% population, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS (log-rank test: p = .19 and p = .79, respectively) between patients with NSCLC in the cachexia or no-cachexia groups. Cancer cachexia might be a poor prognostic factor in patients with NSCLC receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

The Spectrum of Malnutrition/Cachexia/Sarcopenia in Oncology According to Different Cancer Types and Settings: A Narrative Review

Nutritional status in oncological patients may differ according to several modifiable and non-modifiable factors. Knowledge of the epidemiology of malnutrition/cachexia/sarcopenia may help to manage these complications early in the course of treatment, potentially impacting patient quality of life, treatment intensity, and disease outcome. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to critically evaluate the current evidence on the combined impact of tumor- and treatment-related factors on nutritional status and to draw some practical conclusions to support the multidisciplinary management of malnutrition in cancer patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed from January 2010 to December 2020 using different combinations of pertinent keywords and a critical evaluation of retrieved literature papers was conducted. The results show that the prevalence of weight loss and associated symptoms is quite heterogeneous and needs to be assessed with recognized criteria, thus allowing a clear classification and standardization of therapeutic interventions. There is a large range of variability influenced by age and social factors, comorbidities, and setting of cures (community-dwelling versus hospitalized patients). Tumor subsite is one of the major determinants of malnutrition, with pancreatic, esophageal, and other gastroenteric cancers, head and neck, and lung cancers having the highest prevalence. The advanced stage is also linked to a higher risk of developing malnutrition, as an expression of the relationship between tumor burden, inflammatory status, reduced caloric intake, and malabsorption. Finally, treatment type influences the risk of nutritional issues, both for locoregional approaches (surgery and radiotherapy) and for systemic treatment. Interestingly, personalized approaches based on the selection of the most predictive malnutrition definitions for postoperative complications according to cancer type and knowledge of specific nutritional problems associated with some new agents may positively impact disease course. Sharing common knowledge between oncologists and nutritionists may help to better address and treat malnutrition in this population.

Time-To-Event Data: An Overview and Analysis Considerations

In oncology, overall survival and progression-free survival are common time-to-event end points used to measure treatment efficacy. Analyses of this type of data rely on a complex statistical framework and the analysis results are only valid when the data meet certain assumptions. This article provides an overview of time-to-event data, the basic mechanics of common analysis methods, and issues often encountered when analyzing such data. Our goal is to provide clinicians and other lung cancer researchers with the knowledge to choose the appropriate time-to-event analysis methods and to interpret the outcomes of such analyses appropriately. We strongly encourage investigators to seek out statisticians with expertise in survival analysis when embarking on studies that include time-to-event data to ensure that their data are collected and analyzed using the appropriate methods.

Statistical Models in Clinical Studies

Although statistical models serve as the foundation of data analysis in clinical studies, their interpretation requires sufficient understanding of the underlying statistical framework. Statistical modeling is inherently a difficult task because of the general lack of information of the nature of observable data. In this article, we aim to provide some guidance when using regression models to aid clinical researchers to better interpret results from their statistical models and to encourage investigators to collaborate with a statistician to ensure that their studies are designed and analyzed appropriately.

Weight loss over time and survival: a landmark analysis of 1000+ prospectively treated and monitored lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Eligibility criteria and endpoints for cancer cachexia trials-and whether weight loss should be included-remain controversial. Although most cachexia trials enrol patients after initial cancer diagnosis, few studies have addressed whether weight loss well after a cancer diagnosis is prognostic.

METHODS

We pooled data from non-small cell lung cancer patients from prospectively conducted trials within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (1998-2008), a nationally funded infrastructure. We examined (i) weight data availability and weight changes and (ii) survival.

RESULTS

A total of 822 patients were examined. Of these, 659 (80%) were on treatment at the beginning of Cycle 2 of chemotherapy; weight was available for 656 (80%). By Cycles 3 and 4, weight was available for 448 (55%) and 384 (47%), respectively. From baseline to immediately prior to Cycle 2, 208 (32%) gained weight; 225 (34%) lost <2% of baseline weight; and 223 (34% of 656) lost 2% or more. Median survival from the beginning of Cycle 2 was 13.0, 10.9, and 6.9 months for patients with weight gain, weight loss of <2%, and weight loss of 2% or more, respectively. In multivariate analyses, adjusted for age, sex, performance score, type of treatment, and body mass index, weight loss of 2% or more was associated with poor overall survival compared with weight gain [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-2.07; P < 0.001] and compared with weight loss of <2% (HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27-1.95; P < 0.001). Although weight loss of <2% was not associated with poorer overall survival compared with weight gain, it was associated with poorer progression-free survival (HR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01-1.51; P = 0.036). Similar findings were observed in a separate 255-patient validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight should be integrated into cancer cachexia trials because of its ease of frequent measurement and sustained prognostic association.