Stair climbing and mortality: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank

Stair climbing and risk of incident atrial fibrillation: Effect modulated by sex, genetic predisposition, and cardiorespiratory fitness

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Stair climbing, a straightforward and impactful form of physical activity, has shown potential in reducing risks of cardiovascular disease and mortality. However, its association with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains largely unexplored.

METHODS AND RESULTS

451,089 participants (mean age 56.5 years) without cardiovascular disease (year 2006-2010) were included from the UK Biobank study. Stair climbing data was collected through touchscreen questionnaire. AF cases were identified using ICD-10 code: I48 and were followed until February 1, 2022. Models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Over a median follow-up of 12.6 years, 23,660 (5.2 %) participants experienced new-onset AF. In multivariable-adjusted models, climbing 10-50, 60-100, 110-150, and ≥160 steps of stairs per day were associated with significant reductions in the risk of AF, compared to not climbing any stairs. The risk reduction appeared more pronounced in women than in men (P for interaction = 0.09). When compared to participants who climbed no stairs, the HRs for those who climbed 110-150 steps of stairs per day were 0.69 (95 % CI: 0.58-0.82) among those with low cardiorespiratory fitness, 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.57-0.88) among those with intermediate cardiorespiratory fitness, and 0.83 (95 % CI: 0.64-1.07) among those with high cardiorespiratory fitness.

CONCLUSIONS

Climbing stairs was associated with a reduction in AF risks. Significant interaction between cardiorespiratory fitness and stair climbing associated with incident AF was observed. Findings suggest that promoting regular stair climbing could be a potential target for preventing AF onset.

Stair Climbing, Genetic Predisposition, and the Risk of Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Few studies have explored the association between stair climbing and osteoarthritis (OA) to determine whether the former is a protective or risk factor for the latter. This study prospectively evaluated the associations among stair climbing, genetic susceptibility, and their interaction with the risk of incident hip/knee OA.

METHODS

The cohort analyses included 398 939 participants from the UK Biobank. Stair climbing was assessed using a questionnaire. Genetic risk scores consisting of 70, 83, and 87 single-nucleotide polymorphisms for hip, knee, and hip/knee OA were constructed. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations among stair climbing, genetic predisposition, and hip and/or knee OA risk.

RESULTS

After 3 621 735 person-years of follow-up, 31 940 patients developed OA. Stair climbing was positively associated with incident hip/knee (p for trend < .001) and knee (p for trend < .0001) OA but not hip OA. After adjustments, compared with no stair climbing, climbing >150 steps/d was associated with a higher risk of hip/knee OA (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.12) and knee OA (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.20). Although no significant interaction between stair climbing and the genetic risk scores of OA risk was found, the above associations were only significant in participants with middle and high genetic risk scores.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher frequency of stair climbing was positively associated with the risk of knee OA but not hip OA, highlighting the importance of avoiding frequent stair climbing in preventing knee OA, especially in genetically predisposed individuals.

The relationship between physical activity and psychological sub-health among high altitude region Tibetan college students

Background

The reduction in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and the increased prominence of psychological sub-health (PSH) have had a serious negative impact on the health of Tibetan college students. Few studies have been conducted on college student populations at high altitude region in China. Therefore, the study investigated MVPA and PSH in 8721 Tibetan college students to analyze the relationship that exists between them.

Methods

In this study, subjects were selected by cluster sampling method, and 8,721 high altitude region Tibetan college students were questioned about MVPA, PSH, family situation, BMI, and lifestyle. One-way ANOVA, chi-square test, and stepwise logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the relationship between MVPA and PSH.

Results

The proportion of Chinese Tibetan college students at high altitude region with MVPA duration ≤30 Mins/Day, 31-60 Mins/Day, and ≥ 61 Mins/Day were 76.7, 18.7, and 4.7%, respectively. The proportion of Tibetan college students in China experiencing PSH was 16.41%. The percentage of emotional symptoms, behavioral symptoms, and social adaptation difficulties were 17.61, 18.04, and 14.59%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that after adjusting for relevant covariates, Tibetan college students with MVPA ≤30 Mins/Day had a higher odds ratio of PSH compared to college male students with MVPA ≥61 Mins/Day (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.79,4.84). In contrast, there was no significant relationship between MVPA and PSH in college females. Overall, Tibetan college students with MVPA ≤30 Mins/Day had a higher odds ratio of PSH compared to Tibetan college students with MVPA ≥61 Mins/Day (OR = 2.99, 95% CI: 2.00,4.47).

Conclusion

Chinese Tibetan college students from high altitude region areas had lower levels of MVPA and higher rates of PSH. There is an relationship between MVPA time and PSH among high altitude region Tibetan college students, and the incidence of PSH is higher among high altitude region Tibetan college students with shorter MVPA time.

Relationship of device measured physical activity type and posture with cardiometabolic health markers: pooled dose-response associations from the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep Consortium

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to examine the dose-response associations of device-measured physical activity types and postures (sitting and standing time) with cardiometabolic health.

METHODS

We conducted an individual participant harmonised meta-analysis of 12,095 adults (mean ± SD age 54.5±9.6 years; female participants 54.8%) from six cohorts with thigh-worn accelerometry data from the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep (ProPASS) Consortium. Associations of daily walking, stair climbing, running, standing and sitting time with a composite cardiometabolic health score (based on standardised z scores) and individual cardiometabolic markers (BMI, waist circumference, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, HbA1c and total cholesterol) were examined cross-sectionally using generalised linear modelling and cubic splines.

RESULTS

We observed more favourable composite cardiometabolic health (i.e. z score <0) with approximately 64 min/day walking (z score [95% CI] -0.14 [-0.25, -0.02]) and 5 min/day stair climbing (-0.14 [-0.24, -0.03]). We observed an equivalent magnitude of association at 2.6 h/day standing. Any amount of running was associated with better composite cardiometabolic health. We did not observe an upper limit to the magnitude of the dose-response associations for any activity type or standing. There was an inverse dose-response association between sitting time and composite cardiometabolic health that became markedly less favourable when daily durations exceeded 12.1 h/day. Associations for sitting time were no longer significant after excluding participants with prevalent CVD or medication use. The dose-response pattern was generally consistent between activity and posture types and individual cardiometabolic health markers.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In this first activity type-specific analysis of device-based physical activity, ~64 min/day of walking and ~5.0 min/day of stair climbing were associated with a favourable cardiometabolic risk profile. The deleterious associations of sitting time were fully attenuated after exclusion of participants with prevalent CVD and medication use. Our findings on cardiometabolic health and durations of different activities of daily living and posture may guide future interventions involving lifestyle modification.

The Association of Stair Climbing Behaviors With Hazard of All-Cause Mortality in Adults With or At Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of stair climbing difficulty and stair climbing frequency with the risk of all-cause mortality over 13 years in adults with or at high risk for knee OA.

METHODS

We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults with or at high risk for symptomatic knee OA. The exposures were stair climbing difficulty and frequency, assessed at baseline using self-report questionnaires. The outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed from baseline through 13 years of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to investigate the association between stair climbing exposures and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Three hundred seven (6.81%) and 310 (6.84%) participants in the difficulty and frequency samples, respectively, died during 13 years of follow-up. Those who were limited in any capacity in terms of their stair climbing ability had 54% to 84% greater hazard of all-cause mortality, and those who climbed at least 7 flights of stairs per week had 38% lower hazard of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Adults with or at high risk for knee OA who report difficulty with climbing stairs or who infrequently use stairs are at greater hazard of all-cause mortality. Stair climbing difficulty and frequency are simple to collect and changes may occur early in OA progression, allowing for early intervention. Brief questions about stair climbing behaviors can serve as a functional vital sign within the clinician's toolbox.

Stair-climbing interventions on cardio-metabolic outcomes in adults: A scoping review

Objective

Physical inactivity is linked with high chronic disease risk; however, only a fraction of the global population meets the recommendations for physical activity. Stair-climbing is a simple and accessible form of physical activity that has been shown to improve cardio-metabolic outcomes in adults. The present scoping review explores the physiological and therapeutic effects of stair-climbing interventions on adult cardio-metabolic disease risk factors.

Methods

This scoping review followed the reporting guidelines of the Arksey & O'Malley framework, which collates evidence in stages. The research question was framed as "What are the effects of stair climbing on cardio-metabolic outcomes in adults?". Eligible articles were identified through an extensive search of four electronic databases, and data from 24 research studies were charted and organized.

Results

Stair climbing improves aerobic capacity (8-33 ml kg/min) and serum biomarkers by ≈9-15 %. A minimum of 4-8 weeks are necessary to alter cardiometabolic risk. Regular stair climbing can improve cardio-metabolic risk indicators, including body composition, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and insulin sensitivity. The research regarding inflammatory and musculoskeletal changes with stair climbing bouts is still in its infancy.

Conclusion

Stair climbing interventions are a no-cost and feasible form of physical activity for improving cardiometabolic disease risk in adults.

Association of Stair Use With Risk of Major Chronic Diseases

INTRODUCTION

Physical inactivity is associated with a higher risk of chronic diseases. Regular stair use can contribute to increasing physical activity in the population. This study aimed to investigate the association between flights of stairs used daily at home and all-cause mortality and cause-specific incidence and mortality.

METHODS

Of the 502,628 UK Biobank participants recruited between 2007 and 2010, 442,027 (mean age, 56±8 years) had available data and were included in the analyses conducted in 2023. Participants were categorized on the basis of flights of stairs climbed daily (1-5, 6-10, 11-15, >15). The disease-specific outcomes were cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause dementia. Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-related confounding factors, were used to analyze the associations between stair use frequency and health outcomes.

RESULTS

Participants were followed up for a median of 10.9 years. Climbing stairs >15 times per day was associated with a lower risk of 8 of the 9 outcomes analyzed than not using stairs. The magnitude of association ranged from 3% (95% CI=0.94, 0.99) lower risk for all-cause cancer to 51% (95% CI=0.39, 0.60) lower risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Findings were similar for mortality outcomes, with the hazard ratios ranging from 0.82 (95% CI=0.77, 0.87) for all-cause cancer to 0.46 (95% CI=0.23, 0.92) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Stair use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and cause-specific incidence and mortality independent of confounding factors, including adiposity and multimorbidity.

Daily stair climbing, disease susceptibility, and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The associations between intensity of stair climbing and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and how these vary by underlying disease susceptibility are not fully understood. We aim to evaluate the intensity of stair climbing and risk of ASCVD types and whether these vary with the presence of ASCVD risk factors.

METHODS

This prospective study used data of 458,860 adult participants from the UK Biobank. Information about stair climbing, sociodemographic, and lifestyle factors was collected at baseline and a resurvey 5 years after baseline. ASCVD was defined as coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemic stroke (IS), or acute complications. Associations between flights of stair climbing and ASCVD were examined as hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models. The modification role of disease susceptibility on such associations was assessed by analyses stratified by levels of genetic risk score (GRS), 10-year risks of ASCVD, and self-reported family history of ASCVD.

RESULTS

During a median of 12.5 years of follow-up, 39,043 ASCVD, 30,718 CAD, and 10,521 IS cases were recorded. Compared with the reference group (reported climbing stairs 0 times/day at baseline), the multivariable-adjusted HRs for ASCVD were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.01), 0.84 (0.82-0.87), 0.78 (0.75-0.81), 0.77 (0.73-0.80) and 0.81 (0.77-0.85) for stair climbing of 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20 and ≥21 times/day, respectively. Comparable results were obtained for CAD and IS. When stratified by different disease susceptibility based on the GRS for CAD/IS, 10-year risk, and family history of ASCVD, the protection association of stair climbing was attenuated by increasing levels of disease susceptibility. Furthermore, compared with people who reported no stair climbing (<5 times/d) at two examinations, those who climbed stairs at baseline and then stopped at resurvey experienced a 32% higher risk of ASCVD (HR 1.32, 95% CI:1.06-1.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Climbing more than five flights of stairs (approx 50 steps) daily was associated with a lower risk of ASCVD types independent of disease susceptibility. Participants who stopped stair climbing between baseline and resurvey had a higher risk of ASCVD compared with those who never climbed stairs.

Greater number of weekly stairs climbed is associated with lower low back pain prevalence among female but not male physical therapists

INTRODUCTION

Certain cardiovascular health benefits of stair climbing are now widely accepted, but no prior studies have as yet been found linking the quantity of stairs climbed to low back pain (LBP) morbidity. Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal impairment, and research has begun to show an association between LBP and gluteus maximus (GM) weakness. With stair climbing being the activity which most activates GM, the aim of the present research was to assess the relationship between stair ambulation and LBP prevalence. The hypothesis of this cross-sectional study was that individuals with LBP would report a significantly lower numbers of stair flights climbed compared with individuals without LBP.

METHODS

A survey tool was developed and distributed via email to a convenience sample of orthopedic physical therapists. Survey items included information regarding medical history, physical activity, workplace, and LBP factors, using a one-year prevalence period.

RESULTS

A total of 363 respondents took the survey and, after application of exclusion criteria, 248 records remained in our final sample. When analyzing all genders together, non LBP (NLBP) respondents reported a mean of 51.62 flights climbed per week; and LBP respondents reported 37.82 flights climbed per week, with P = 0.077. When males and females were analyzed separately, a statistically significant difference in mean number of flights of stairs climbed was found among female respondents (61.51 flights climbed for NLBP and 35.61 flights climbed for LBP females; P = 0.031). When analyzed based on chronicity of LBP, an even stronger association between stairs climbed and LBP prevalence was found for female respondents with acute LBP (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

More weekly stairs climbed was associated with a lower LBP prevalence among females, especially with respect to acute LBP. Randomized, longitudinal research is, however, required to confirm a relationship between stair climbing and LBP.

Stair climbing, genetic predisposition, and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: A large population-based prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional evidence and small-scale trials suggest positive effects of stair climbing on cardiometabolic disease and glucose regulation. However, few studies have examined the long-term association between stair climbing and the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to prospectively evaluate the association of stair climbing with T2D and assess modifications by genetic predisposition to T2D.

METHODS

We included 451,699 adults (mean age = 56.3 ± 8.1 years, mean ± SD; 55.2% females) without T2D at baseline in the UK Biobank and followed up to March 31, 2021. Stair climbing information was collected through the touchscreen questionnaire. Genetic risk score for T2D consisted of 424 single nucleotide polymorphisms.

RESULTS

During a median follow up of 12.1 years, 14,896 T2D cases were documented. Compared with participants who reported no stair climbing, those who climbed stairs regularly had a lower risk of incident T2D (10-50 steps/day: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.89-1.00; 60-100 steps/day: HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.87-0.98; 110-150 steps/day: HR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.80-0.91; >150 steps/day: HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.87-0.99, p for trend = 0.0007). We observed a significant interaction between stair climbing and genetic risk score on the subsequent T2D risk (p for interaction = 0.0004), where the risk of T2D showed a downward trend in subjects with low genetic risk and those who reported stair climbing activity of 110-150 steps/day appeared to have the lowest overall T2D risk among those with intermediate to high genetic risk.

CONCLUSION

A higher number of stairs climbed at home was associated with lower T2D incidence risk, especially among individuals with a low genetic predisposition to T2D. These findings highlight that stair climbing, as incidental physical activity, offers a simple and low-cost complement to public health interventions for T2D prevention.

Stair climbing and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a population-based prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stair climbing is a readily available form of physical activity with potential cardioprotective merits. Herein, we investigated the association between stair climbing and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) incidence among Japanese people.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study used data from 7,282 participants, aged 30-84 years, registered in the Suita Study and free from stroke and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Standard approaches were used to detect incident ASCVD events, including cerebral infarction and IHD, during follow-up. Stair climbing was assessed using a baseline questionnaire. We applied the Cox regression to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of incident ASCVD for climbing stairs in 20-39%, 40-59%, and ≥60% compared to <20% of the time. We adjusted the regression models for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, lipid profile, chronic kidney disease, and history of cardiac murmur or valvular diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 536 new ASCVD events were detected within a median follow-up period of 16.6 years. In the age- and sex-adjusted model, stair climbing 20-39%, 40-59%, and ≥60% of the time was associated with lower ASCVD incidence: HRs (95% CIs) = 0.72 (0.56, 0.92), 0.86 (0.68, 1.08), and 0.78 (0.61, 0.99), respectively (p-trend = 0.020). The corresponding associations were attenuated after adjusting for lifestyle and clinical factors: HRs (95% CIs) = 0.74 (0.58, 0.95), 0.90 (0.71, 1.13), and 0.89 (0.69, 1.13), respectively (p-trend = 0.152).

CONCLUSION

Frequent stair climbing was associated with lower ASCVD incidence; however, this association was partly explained by lifestyle and clinical factors of participants.

A longitudinal controlled signage intervention to increase stair use at university buildings: Process and impact evaluation using RE-AIM framework

Introduction

Stair climbing intervention could be suggested to address low occupational physical activity amongst university students and employees. Strong evidence showed the effectiveness of signage intervention in increasing stair use in public areas. However, evidence in worksite settings, including university settings, was inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the process and impact of a signage intervention to increase stair use at a university building using the RE-AIM framework.

Method

We conducted a non-randomised controlled pretest-posttest study to examine the effect of signage intervention placed in university buildings in Yogyakarta (Indonesia) between September 2019 and March 2020. The process of designing the signage involved the employees in the intervention building. The main outcome was the change in the proportion of stair use to elevator use measured by manual observations of video recordings from closed-circuit television. A linear mixed model examined the intervention effect by controlling the total visitor count as a confounder. RE-AIM framework was used in the process and impact evaluation.

Results

The change in the proportion of stair climbing from baseline to the 6th-month phase at the intervention building (+0.067 (95% CI = 0.014-0.120)) was significantly higher than that of the control building. However, the signs did not change the proportion of the stair descending at the intervention building. The signs were potentially viewed 15,077-18,868 times/week by visitors.

Conclusion

Signage intervention using portable posters could easily be adopted, implemented, and maintained in similar settings. A co-produced low-cost signage intervention was found to have a good reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance dimension.

Stair climbing and mortality: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank

BACKGROUND

Regular stair climbing has the potential to lower the risk of premature death, but current evidence is scarce. We aimed to examine whether daily stair climbing is associated with lower risk of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.

METHODS

Using the UK Biobank cohort, we extracted information of self-reported daily flights of stairs climbed at home, categorized as none, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, and ≥16 flights per day. Associations between flights of stair climbed per day and mortality were examined as hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic, clinical, and behavioural covariates including time spent in other physical activities. We calculated the restricted mean survival time as an absolute measure of association. The risk of residual confounding was examined using propensity score matching and by using lung cancer as negative control outcome. Participants were followed from baseline (2006-2010) through 31 March 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 280 423 participants (median follow-up 11.1 years, during which 9445 deaths occurred) were included. Compared with not climbing any stairs, climbing more than five flights of stairs at home per day was associated with lower risk of premature mortality. The lowest risk was found for those climbing 6-10 flights per day: 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85, 0.98, translated to approximately 44 to 55 days of additional survival. A similar pattern was found after applying propensity score matching and for cancer mortality (6-10 flights per day HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.97), but not for CVD mortality (6-10 flights per day HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.29). The association between stair climbing and lung cancer was similar to that of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Climbing more than five flights of stairs at home per day was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cancer mortality, but not CVD mortality, compared with those who did not take the stairs. The magnitude of the association was small and appeared susceptible to residual confounding. It is unlikely that at-home stair climbing is sufficient physical activity stimuli to lower the risk of premature mortality.