Comparison of technical failure of MR elastography for measuring liver stiffness between gradient‐recalled echo and spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Advanced MRI techniques in abdominal imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial modality for abdominal imaging evaluation of focal lesions and tissue properties. However, several obstacles, such as prolonged scan times, limitations in patients' breath-hold capacity, and contrast agent-associated artifacts, remain in abdominal MR images. Recent techniques, including parallel imaging, three-dimensional acquisition, compressed sensing, and deep learning, have been developed to reduce the scan time while ensuring acceptable image quality or to achieve higher resolution without extending the scan duration. Quantitative measurements using MRI techniques enable the noninvasive evaluation of specific materials. A comprehensive understanding of these advanced techniques is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI sequences. Herein, we therefore review advanced abdominal MRI techniques.

Technical Success and Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Patients with Hepatic Iron Overload

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the technical success rate and stiffness measurement reliability of two specific hepatic magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) sequences dedicated to solving susceptibility artifacts in patients with various degrees of hepatic iron overload.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with iron-overloaded liver confirmed by R2* value measurement who underwent two-dimensional (2D) spin-echo (SE) MRE and 2D SE-echo-planar-imaging (EPI) MRE were reviewed retrospectively. According to four categories based on R2* value (mild, moderate, severe elevation, and extremely severe iron overload), we compared the success rate, quality score, and liver stiffness of the two sequences. In addition, Spearman's correlation was performed to evaluate the relationship between the R2* value and liver stiffness.

RESULTS

The overall success rates of SE MRE and SE-EPI MRE in patients with hepatic iron overload were 91.89% and 78.38%, respectively, and 100% and 78.57%, respectively, for severe elevation iron overload. In all patients, the MRE quality scores were 54 and 48 for SE MRE and SE-EPI MRE, respectively (P = 0.107). There were no significant differences in liver stiffness measurements between the two MRE methods in patients with mild, moderate, and severe elevation iron-overloaded livers (P > 0.6 for all), respectively. For both MRE methods, R2* value had no significant effect on the liver stiffness measurements (correlation coefficient <0.1, P >0.6 for both).

CONCLUSION

In the mild and moderate elevation iron-overloaded liver, both SE MRE and fast SE-EPI MRE can provide successful and reliable liver stiffness measurement. In severe elevation iron-overloaded livers, SE MRE may be a better choice than SE-EPI MRE.

The staging of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis: A comparative study of MR elastography and the quantitative DCE-MRI exchange model

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and image processing time of the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) exchange model in liver fibrosis staging and compare it to the efficacy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Methods

The subjects were 45 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who underwent MRE and DCE-MRI in our hospital. Liver biopsy results were available for all patients. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to compare the correlations among MRE, DCE-MRI and liver fibrosis parameters. Quantitative DCE-MRI parameters, MRE-derived liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and the results of a combined DCE-MRI + MRE logistic regression model were compared in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We also compared the scanning and postprocessing times of the MRE and DCE-MRI techniques.

Results

The correlation coefficients between the following parameters of interest and liver fibrosis were as follows: capillary permeability-surface area product (PS; DCE-MRI parameter), -0.761; portal blood flow (Fp; DCE-MRI parameter), -0.754; MRE-LSM, 0.835. Some DCE-MRI parameters (PS, Fp) had slightly greater AUC values than MRE-LSM for diagnosing the presence or absence of liver fibrosis, and the combined model had the highest AUC value for all stages except F4, but there was no significant difference in the diagnostic efficacy of the DCE-MRI, MRE, and combined models for any stage of fibrosis. The average scanning times for MRE and DCE-MRI were 17 s and 330 s, respectively, and the average postprocessing times were 45.5 s and 342.7 s, respectively.

Conclusions

In the absence of MRE equipment, DCE-MRI represents an alternative technique. However, MRE is a quicker and simpler method for assessing fibrosis than DCE-MRI in the clinic.

Magnetic resonance elastography for noninvasive detection of liver fibrosis: is there an added value of 3D acquisition?

PURPOSE

(1) Assess the diagnostic performance of liver 3D magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) parameters (including stiffness, storage/loss modulus and damping ratio) compared to liver stiffness measured with 2D MRE for noninvasive detection of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4) and cirrhosis (F4) in patients with chronic liver disease. (2) Assess the value of serum markers (FIB-4) in detecting advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in the same patients.

METHODS

This was a single center, prospective IRB-approved cross-sectional study that included 49 patients (M/F: 23/26, mean age 50.8 y) with chronic liver disease and concomitant liver biopsy. MRE was acquired at 1.5T using a spin echo-EPI sequence. The following parameters were measured: liver stiffness using 2D MRE (LS-2D) and 3D MRE parameters (LS-3D, liver storage, loss modulus and damping ratio). The Mann-Whitney U test, ROC curve analysis, Spearman correlation and logistic regression were performed to evaluate diagnostic performance of MRE parameters and FIB-4.

RESULTS

LS-2D and LS-3D had similar diagnostic performance for diagnosis of F3-F4, with AUCs of 0.87 and 0.88, sensitivity of 0.71 and 0.81, specificity of 0.89 for both. For diagnosis of F4, LS-2D and LS-3D had similar performance with AUCs of 0.81 for both, sensitivity of 0.75 and 0.83, and specificity of 0.84 and 0.73, respectively. Additional 3D parameters (storage modulus, loss modulus, damping ratio) had variable performance, with AUC range of 0.59-0.78 for F3-F4; and 0.52-0.70 for F4. FIB-4 had lower diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.66 for F3-F4, and 0.68 for F4.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows no added value of 3D MRE compared to 2D MRE for detection of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, while FIB-4 had lower diagnostic performance.

Clinical Application of Quantitative MR Imaging in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Viral hepatitis was previously the most common cause of chronic liver disease. However, in recent years, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cases have been increasing, especially in developed countries. NAFLD is histologically characterized by fat, fibrosis, and inflammation in the liver, eventually leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although biopsy is the gold standard for the assessment of the liver parenchyma, quantitative evaluation methods, such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI, have been reported to have good diagnostic performances. The quantification of liver fat, fibrosis, and inflammation is expected to be clinically useful in terms of the prognosis, early intervention, and treatment response for the management of NAFLD. The aim of this review was to discuss the basics and prospects of MRI-based tissue quantifications of the liver, mainly focusing on proton density fat fraction for the quantification of fat deposition, MR elastography for the quantification of fibrosis, and multifrequency MR elastography for the evaluation of inflammation.

Comparison between Gradient-Echo and Spin-Echo EPI MR Elastography at 3 T in quantifying liver stiffness of patients with and without iron overload; a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the maximum axial area of the confidence mask and the calculated liver stiffness (LS) on gradient-echo (GRE) and spin-echo echo planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography (MRE) in patients with and without iron deposition.

METHODS

104 patients underwent MRE by GRE and SE-EPI sequences at 3 T. R2* values >88 Hz in the liver were categorized in the iron overload group. The maximum axial area and the corresponding LS values were measured by manually contouring the whole area on one slice with the largest confidence mask at both GRE and SE-EPI sequences.

RESULTS

In patients with iron overload, SE-EPI provided larger maximum axial confidence area in unfailed images (57.6 ± 41.7 cm²) compared to GRE (45.7 ± 29.1 cm²) (p-value = 0.007). In five patients with iron overload, imaging failed at GRE sequence, whereas at the SE-EPI sequence the maximum area of the confidence mask had a mean value of 33.5 ± 54.9 cm². In livers without iron overload (R2*: 50.7 ± 13.1 Hz), the maximum area on the confidence mask was larger at SE-EPI (118.3 ± 41.2 cm²) than on GRE (105.1 ± 31.7 cm²) (P-value = 0.003). There was no significant difference in mean LS between SE-EPI (2.0 ± 0.3 kPa) and GRE (2.1 ± 0.5 kPa) in livers with iron overload (P value = 0.24). Similarly, in the group without iron overload, mean LS was 2.3 ± 0.7 kPa at SE-EPI and 2.4 ± 0.8 kPa at GRE sequences (P-value = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

SE-EPI MRE can successfully provide similar LS measurements as GRE MRE. Furthermore, it provides a larger measurable area on the confidence mask in both groups with and without iron overload.

Fast acquisition of propagating waves in humans with low-field MRI: Toward accessible MR elastography

Most commonly used at clinical magnetic fields (1.5 to 3 T), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) captures mechanical wave propagation to reconstruct the mechanical properties of soft tissue with MRI. However, in terms of noninvasively assessing disease progression in a broad range of organs (e.g., liver, breast, skeletal muscle, and brain), its accessibility is limited and its robustness is challenged when magnetic susceptibility differences are encountered. Low-field MRE offers an opportunity to overcome these issues, and yet it has never been demonstrated in vivo in humans with magnetic fields <1.5 T mainly because of the long acquisition times required to achieve a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. Here, we describe a method to accelerate 3D motion-sensitized MR scans at 0.1 T using only 10% k-space sampling combined with a high-performance detector and an efficient encoding acquisition strategy. Its application is demonstrated in vivo in the human forearm for a single motion-encoding direction in less than 1 min.

Noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis: review of current quantitative CT and MRI-based techniques

Liver fibrosis features excessive protein accumulation in the liver interstitial space resulting from repeated tissue injury due to chronic liver disease. Liver fibrosis eventually proceeds to cirrhosis and associated complications. So, early diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are of vital importance for clinical treatment. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosing and staging of fibrosis, but it is suboptimal due to various limitations. Recently, efforts have been made to migrate toward noninvasive techniques for assessing liver fibrosis. CT is relatively easy to perform, relatively standardized for different scanners, and does not require additional hardware in liver fibrosis staging. MRI is frequently performed to characterize indeterminate liver lesions. Because it does not use ionizing radiation and features high image contrast, its role has increased in the staging of liver fibrosis. More recently, several studies on liver fibrosis staging using deep learning algorithms in CT or MRI have been proposed and have shown meaningful results. In this review, we summarize the basic concept, diagnostic performance, and advantages and limitations of each technique to noninvasively stage liver fibrosis.

Reliability of Gradient-Echo Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Lumbar Muscles: Phantom and Clinical Studies

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has been used to successfully characterize the mechanical behavior of healthy and diseased muscles, but no study has been performed to investigate the reliability of MRE on lumbar muscles. The objective of this work was to determine the reliability of MRE techniques on lumbar muscles in both ex vivo phantom and in vivo human studies. In this study, fresh porcine leg muscles were used in the phantom study, and 80 healthy adults (38.6 ± 11.2 years, 40 women) were recruited in the human study. Five repeated stiffness maps were obtained from both the phantom and human muscles by using a gradient-echo MRE sequence with a pneumatic vibration on a 1.5 T MR scanner. The technical failure rate, coefficient of variation (CV), and quality score were assessed to evaluate the reliability of MRE, respectively. Analysis of variance was performed to compare the stiffness between different lumbar muscles, and the difference was significant if p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction. The results showed that the MRE achieved a zero technical failure rate and a low CV of stiffness (6.24 ± 1.41%) in the phantom muscles. However, in the human study, the MRE exhibited high CVs of stiffness (21.57%−25.24%) in the lumbar muscles, and the technical failure rate was higher in psoas muscles (60.0−66.3% in) than in paraspinal muscles (0.0−2.5%). Further, higher quality scores were noticed in paraspinal muscles (7.31−7.71) than those in psoas muscles (1.83−2.06). In conclusion, the MRE was a reliable technique to investigate the mechanical property of lumbar muscles, but it was less reliable to assess stiffness in psoas muscles than paraspinal muscles.

MRE-based NASH score for diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is approximately 30% in the general population, it is important to develop a non-invasive biomarker for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop a scoring system for NASH diagnosis through multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) and clinical indicators.

METHODS

Medical history, laboratory tests, and MR parameters of patients with NAFLD were assessed. A scoring system was developed using a logistic regression model. In total, 127 patients (58 with nonalcoholic fatty liver [NAFL] and 69 with NASH) were enrolled. After evaluating 23 clinical characteristics of the patients (4 categorical and 19 numeric variables) for the NASH diagnostic model, an equation for MR elastography (MRE)-based NASH score was obtained using 3 demographic factors, 2 laboratory variables, and MRE.

RESULTS

The MRE-based NASH score showed a satisfactory accuracy for NASH diagnosis (c-statistics, 0.841; 95% CI 0.772-0.910). At a cut-off MRE-based NASH score of 0.68 for NASH diagnosis, its sensitivity was 0.68 and specificity was 0.91. When an MRE-based NASH score of 0.37 was used as a cut-off for NASH exclusion, the sensitivity was 0.91 and specificity was 0.55. Overall, 35% (44/127) of patients were in the gray zone (between 0.37 and 0.68). Internal validation via bootstrapping also indicated the satisfactory accuracy of NASH diagnosis (optimism-corrected statistics, 0.811).

CONCLUSION

MRE-based NASH score is a useful and accurate non-invasive biomarker for diagnosis of NASH in patients with NAFLD.

Comparison of Transient Elastography, ShearWave Elastography, Magnetic Resonance Elastography and FibroTest as routine diagnostic markers for assessing liver fibrosis in children with Cystic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Reliable markers are needed for early diagnosis and follow-up of liver disease in Cystic Fibrosis (CF). The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Transient Elastography (TE), Real-Time ShearWave Ultrasound Elastography (SWE), Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) and the FibroTest as markers of Cystic Fibrosis Liver Disease (CFLD).

METHODS

A monocentric prospective cross-modality comparison study was proposed to all children (6 to 18 years of age) attending the CF center. Based on liver ultrasound findings, participants were classified into 3 groups: multinodular liver or portal hypertension (Nodular US/PH, advanced CFLD), heterogeneous increased echogenicity (Heterogeneous US, CFLD) or neither (Normal/Homogeneous US, no CFLD). The 4 tests were performed on the same day. The primary outcome was the FibroTest value and liver stiffness measurements (LSM).

RESULTS

55 participants (mean age 12.6 ± 3.3 years; 25 girls) were included between 2015 and 2018: 23 in group Nodular US/PH, 8 in group Heterogeneous US and 24 in group Normal/Homogeneous US (including 4 with steatosis). LSM on TE, SWE and MRE were higher in participants with CFLD (groups Nodular US/PH and Heterogeneous US) compared to others (group Normal/Homogeneous US) (p<0.01), while FibroTest values did not differ (p = 0.09). The optimal cut-off values for predicting CFLD on TE, SWE and MRE were 8.7 (AUC=0.83, Se=0.71, Sp=0.96), 7.8 (AUC=0.85, Se=0.73, Sp=0.96) and 4.15 kPa (AUC=0.68, Se=0.73, Sp=0.64), respectively. LSM predicted the occurrence of major liver-related events at 3 years. TE and SWE were highly correlated (Spearman's ρ=0.9) and concordant in identifying advanced CFLD (Cohen's κ=0.84) while MRE was moderately correlated and concordant with TE (ρ=0.41; κ=36) and SWE (ρ=0.5; κ=0.50).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance of TE, SWE and MRE for the diagnosis of CFLD.

Diagnostic Performance of Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Magnetic Resonance Elastography in 3T System for Noninvasive Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis

Objective

To validate the performance of 3T spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging hepatic fibrosis in a large population, using surgical specimens as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study initially included 310 adults (155 undergoing hepatic resection and 155 undergoing donor hepatectomy) with histopathologic results from surgical liver specimens. They underwent 3T SE-EPI MRE ≤ 3 months prior to surgery. Demographic findings, underlying liver disease, and hepatic fibrosis pathologic stage according to METAVIR were recorded. Liver stiffness (LS) was measured by two radiologists, and inter-reader reproducibility was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The mean LS of each fibrosis stage (F0–F4) was calculated in total and for each etiologic subgroup. Comparisons among subgroups were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Conover post-hoc test. The cutoff values for fibrosis staging were estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Inter-reader reproducibility was excellent (ICC, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97–0.99). The mean LS values were 1.91, 2.41, 3.24, and 5.41 kPa in F0–F1 (n = 171), F2 (n = 26), F3 (n = 38), and F4 (n = 72), respectively. The discriminating cutoff values for diagnosing ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 were 2.18, 2.71, and 3.15 kPa, respectively, with the ROC curve areas of 0.97–0.98 (sensitivity 91.2%–95.9%, specificity 90.7%–99.0%). The mean LS was significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis (F4) of nonviral causes, such as primary biliary cirrhosis (9.56 kPa) and alcoholic liver disease (7.17 kPa) than in those with hepatitis B or C cirrhosis (4.28 and 4.92 kPa, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in LS among the different etiologic subgroups in the F0–F3 stages.

Conclusion

The 3T SE-EPI MRE demonstrated high interobserver reproducibility, and our criteria for staging hepatic fibrosis showed high diagnostic performance. LS was significantly higher in patients with non-viral cirrhosis than in those with viral cirrhosis.

Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: everything you need to know to get started

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the liver has emerged as the non-invasive standard for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases (CLDs). The utility of MRE in the evaluation of different CLD in both adults and children has been demonstrated in several studies, and MRE has been recommended by several clinical societies. Consequently, the clinical indications for evaluation of CLD with MRE have increased, and MRE is currently used as an add-on test during routine liver MRI studies or as a standalone test. To meet the increasing clinical demand, MRE is being installed in many academic and private practice imaging centers. There is a need for a comprehensive practical guide to help these practices to deliver high-quality liver MRE studies as well as troubleshoot the common issues with MRE to ensure smooth running of the service. This comprehensive clinical practice review summarizes the indications and provides an overview on why to use MRE, technical requirements, system set-up, patient preparation, acquiring the data, and interpretation.

1.5 vs 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review of Favorite Clinical Applications for Both Field Strengths-Part 1

ABSTRACT

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems with a field strength of 3 T have been offered by all leading manufacturers for approximately 2 decades and are increasingly used in clinical diagnostics despite higher costs. Technologically, MRI systems operating at 3 T have reached a high standard in recent years, as well as the 1.5-T devices that have been in use for a longer time. For modern MRI systems with 3 T, more complexity is required, especially for the magnet and the radiofrequency (RF) system (with multichannel transmission). Many clinical applications benefit greatly from the higher field strength due to the higher signal yield (eg, imaging of the brain or extremities), but there are also applications where the disadvantages of 3 T might outweigh the advantages (eg, lung imaging or examinations in the presence of implants). This review describes some technical features of modern 1.5-T and 3-T whole-body MRI systems, and reports on the experience of using both types of devices in different clinical settings, with all sections written by specialist radiologists in the respective fields.This first part of the review includes an overview of the general physicotechnical aspects of both field strengths and elaborates the special conditions of diffusion imaging. Many relevant aspects in the application areas of musculoskeletal imaging, abdominal imaging, and prostate diagnostics are discussed.

Quality Control of Magnetic Resonance Elastography Using Percent Measurable Liver Volume Estimation

BACKGROUND

Although studies have described factors associated with failed magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), little is known about what factors influence usable elastography data.

PURPOSE

To identify factors that have a negative impact on percent measurable liver volume (pMLV), defined as the proportion of usable liver elastography data relative to the volume of imaged liver in patients undergoing MRE.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 264 patients (n = 132 males, n = 132 females; mean age = 57 years) with suspected or known chronic liver disease underwent MRE paired with a liver protocol MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

MRE was performed on a single 1.5 T scanner using a two-dimensional gradient-recalled echo phase-contrast sequence with a passive acoustic driver overlying the right hemiliver.

ASSESSMENT

Stiffness maps (usable data at 95% confidence) and liver contours on magnitude images of the MRE acquisition were manually traced and used to assess mean stiffness and pMLV. Hepatic fat fraction and R² * values were also calculated. The distance from the acoustic wave generator on the skin surface to the liver edge was measured. Two radiologists performed the MR analyses with 50 overlapping cases for inter-reader analysis.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Linear regression was performed to identify factors significantly associated with pMLV. Intraclass correlation was performed for inter-reader reliability.

RESULTS

pMLV was 31% ± 20% (range 0%-86%). Complete MRE failure (i.e. pMLV = 0%) occurred in 10 patients (4%). Multivariate linear regression identified higher hepatic fat fraction, R² *, BMI, and driver-to-liver surface distance; male sex; and lower mean liver stiffness was significantly independently associated with lower pMLV. Intraclass correlation for pMLV was 0.96, suggestive of excellent reliability.

DATA CONCLUSION

Higher fat fraction, R² *, BMI, driver-to-liver surface distance, male sex, and lower mean liver stiffness were associated with lower pMLV. Optimization of image acquisition parameters and driver placement may improve MRE quality, and pMLV likely serves as a diagnostic utility quality control metric.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Liver surface nodularity on non-contrast MRI identifies advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of liver surface nodularity (LSN) for the assessment of advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patients with pathologically proven NAFLD who underwent liver MRI. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data (including FIB-4 scores) were gathered. The SAF score was used to assess NAFLD. MRI-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and LSN were determined on pre-contrast MR sequences. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-LSN for the diagnosis of advanced (F3-F4) liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

The final population included 142 patients. Sixty-seven (47%) patients had non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and 52 (37%) had advanced fibrosis. The median MRI-PDFF increased with the grades of steatosis: 8.1%, 18.1%, and 31% in S1, S2, and S3 patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of MRI-LSN ≥ 2.50 was 0.838 (95%CI 0.767-0.894, sensitivity 67.3%, specificity 88.9%, positive and negative predictive values 77.8% and 82.5%, respectively) for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis. Combining FIB-4 and MRI-LSN correctly classified 103/142 (73%) patients. This was validated in an external cohort of 75 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-LSN has good diagnostic performance in diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients. A combination of FIB-4 and MRI-LSN derived from pre-contrast MRI could be helpful to detect advanced fibrosis.

KEY POINTS

• MRI-LSN ≥ 2.5 was accurate for the diagnosis of advanced hepatic fibrosis in NAFLD patients. • The combination of FIB-4 and MRI-LSN improved the detection of advanced fibrosis. • MRI-LSN can be easily derived by unenhanced MRI sequences that are routinely acquired.

Using MR elastography to assess portal hypertension and response to beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

MR elastography can determine organ-related stiffness, which reflects the degree of fibrosis. Liver stiffness increases in cirrhosis, and stiffness increases further post-prandially due to increased portal blood in-flow. Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) reduce the portal venous inflow, but their effect on liver and spleen stiffness are disputed.

AIMS

To assess whether MR elastography of the liver or spleen reflects the severity of cirrhosis, whether treatment with NSBB changes liver and spleen stiffness and whether changes in stiffness can predict the effect of NSBB on portal pressure.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with cirrhosis underwent liver vein catheterization and two-dimensional (2D) MR elastography on separate days. Thirty-six of the patients had a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of ≥12 mmHg and were tested prior to, and after, intravenous infusion of NSBB using HVPG measurement and MR elastography.

RESULTS

HVPG showed a strong, positive, linear relationship with liver stiffness (r²  = 0.92; P < .001) and spleen stiffness (r²  = 0.94; P < .001). The cut-off points for identifying patients with a HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg were 7.7 kPa for liver stiffness (sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.64) and 10.5 kPa for spleen stiffness (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.79). Intravenous administration of NSBB significantly decreased spleen stiffness by 6.9% (CI: 3.5-10.4, P < .001), but NSBB had no consistent effect on liver stiffness. However, changes in spleen stiffness were not related to the HVPG response (P = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-dimensional MR elastographic estimation of liver or spleen stiffness reflects the degree of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis, but changes in stiffness after NSBB do not predict the effect on HVPG.

MR elastography in patients with suspected diffuse liver disease at 1.5T: Intraindividual comparison of gradient-recalled echo versus spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequences and investigation of potential confounding factors

PURPOSE

To compare liver stiffness (LS) in patients with suspected diffuse liver disease between gradient-recalled-echo magnetic resonance elastography (GRE-MRE) and different spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI-MRE) sequences and to investigate confounding factors including fat, iron, age, and sex.

METHOD

LS was measured at 1.5T using GRE-MRE, SE-EPI-MRE and short-TE-SE-EPI-MRE (hiSE-EPI-MRE) sequences and compared using Bland-Altman-plots together with concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). Success gradings were evaluated considering possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

305 patients (225 male, 80 females, mean age 51.12 years) were included. 109/305 showed hepatic iron overload, 183 hepatic steatosis. The mean difference (bias) in stiffness values between GRE-MRE and SE-EPI-MRE/hiSE-EPI-MRE was 0.15/0.2 kPa (LOA: -0.72,0.41 kPa/-0.94,0.55 kPa), between SE-EPI-MRE and hiSE-EPI-MRE 0.04 kPa (LOA: -0.62,0.53 kPa). The CCC for agreement between stiffness values for GRE-MRE and SE-EPI-MRE was 0.94 (0.92-0.95), 0.89 (0.86-0.91) for hiSE-EPI-MRE and GRE-MRE and 0.94 (0.92-0.95) for SE-EPI-MRE and hiSE-EPI-MRE. Using GRE-MRE, 72/305 showed unusable results whereby all these patients had high iron levels (mean R2*=209.7 1/s). For SE-EPI-MRE and hiSE-EPI-MRE only 10/305 and 8/305 were inconclusive respectively, corresponding to a significantly higher iron load (mean R2*= 549.2 1/s for SE-EPI-MRE and 570.7 1/s for hiSE-EPI-MRE). Concerning fat, age or sex no significant influence on success was observed for all sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Good agreement of LS values was observed between GRE-MRE and SE-EPI-MRE sequences. The number of successful exams, however, was considerably lower for GRE-MRE, mainly due to iron content. Study reference number: AN5093.

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2D and 3D MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of state-of-the-art 2D MR elastography (MRE) and 3D MRE in the basic application of liver fibrosis staging.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed data from 293 patients who underwent 2D and 3D MRE examinations. MRE image quality was assessed with a qualitative 2-point grading system by evaluating artifacts. Two experienced analysts independently measured mean liver stiffness values. The interobserver agreement of liver stiffness measurement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic performance of 2D and 3D MRE and blood-based markers for fibrosis staging using the pathology-proven liver fibrosis stage as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The image quality provided by 3D MRE was graded as significantly higher than that obtained with the 2D MRE method (p < 0.01). Interobserver agreement in liver stiffness measurements was higher for 3D MRE (ICC: 3D 0.979 vs 2D 0.955). The AUC values for discriminating ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 fibrosis for 3D MRE (0.89, 0.92, 0.95, and 0.93) were similar to those for 2D MRE (0.89, 0.91, 0.94, and 0.92). Both the 2D and 3D MRE methods provided superior accuracy to the blood-based biomarkers, including APRI, FIB-4, and Forns index, especially for ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 fibrosis stages (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While 3D MRE offers certain advantages and opportunities for new applications of MRE, current widely deployed 2D MRE technology has comparable performance in the basic application of detecting and staging liver fibrosis.

KEY POINTS

• 2D MRE and 3D MRE have comparable diagnostic performance in detecting and staging liver fibrosis. • 3D MRE has superior image quality and interobserver agreement compared to 2D MRE.

Assessment of SE-MRE-derived shear stiffness at 3.0 Tesla for solid liver tumors characterization

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic value of using a 2D spin-echo MR elastography (SE-MRE) sequence at 3.0 Tesla for solid focal liver lesions (FLL) characterization.

METHODS

This prospective study included 55 patients with solid FLL (size > 20 mm), who underwent liver SE-MRE at 3 Tesla between 2016 and 2019. Stiffness measurements were performed by two independent readers blinded to the complete MRI exam or patient information. Histological confirmation or typical behavior on the complete MRI exam evaluated in consensus by expert abdominal radiologists was used as reference standard. FLLs were grouped and compared (malignant vs. benign) using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. MRE diagnostic performance was assessed, and stiffness cutoffs were obtained by analysis of ROC curves from accuracy maximization. A linear regression plot was used to evaluate inter-rater agreement for FLLs stiffness measurements. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The final study group comprised 57 FLLs (34 malignant, 23 benign). Stiffness measurements were technically successful in 91.23% of lesions. To both readers, the median stiffness of the lesions categorized as benign was 4.5 ± 1.5 kPa and in the malignant group 6.8 ± 1.7 and 7.5 ± 1.5 kPa depending on the reader. A cutoff of 5.8 kPa distinguished malignant and benign lesions with 88% specificity and 75-85% accuracy depending on the reader. The inter-rater agreement was 0.90 ± 0.04 with a correlation coefficient of 0.94.

CONCLUSION

2D-SE-MRE at 3.0 T provides high specificity and PPV to differentiate benign from malignant liver lesions. Trial registration 18FFUA-A02.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for chronic liver disease

Chronic liver disease (CLD) has rapidly increased in prevalence over the past two decades, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Historically, the clinical gold standard for diagnosis, assessment of severity, and longitudinal monitoring of CLD has been liver biopsy with histological analysis, but this approach has limitations that may make it suboptimal for clinical and research settings. Magnetic resonance (MR)-based biomarkers can overcome the limitations by allowing accurate, precise, and quantitative assessment of key components of CLD without the risk of invasive procedures. This review briefly describes the limitations associated with liver biopsy and the need for non-invasive biomarkers. It then discusses the current state-of-the-art for MRI-based biomarkers of liver iron, fat, and fibrosis, and inflammation.

Magnetic resonance elastography to quantify liver disease severity in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether liver and spleen magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can measure the severity of congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) and portal hypertension (pHTN) in individuals with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD), and to examine correlations between liver MRE and ultrasound (US) elastography.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of nine individuals with ARPKD and 14 healthy controls. MRE was performed to measure mean liver and spleen stiffness (kPa); US elastography was performed to measure point shear wave speed (SWS) in both liver lobes. We compared: (1) MRE liver and spleen stiffness between controls vs. ARPKD; and (2) MRE liver stiffness between participants with ARPKD without vs. with pHTN, and examined correlations between MRE liver stiffness, spleen length, platelet counts, and US elastography SWS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to examine diagnostic accuracy of liver MRE.

RESULTS

Participants with ARPKD (median age 16.8 [IQR 13.3, 18.9] years) had higher median MRE liver stiffness than controls (median age 14.7 [IQR 9.7, 16.7 years) (2.55 vs. 1.92 kPa, p = 0.008), but MRE spleen stiffness did not differ. ARPKD participants with pHTN had higher median MRE liver stiffness than those without (3.60 kPa vs 2.49 kPa, p = 0.05). Liver MRE and US elastography measurements were strongly correlated. To distinguish ARPKD vs. control groups, liver MRE had 78% sensitivity and 93% specificity at a proposed cut-off of 2.48 kPa [ROC area 0.83 (95% CI 0.63-1.00)].

CONCLUSION

Liver MRE may be a useful quantitative method to measure the severity of CHF and pHTN in individuals with ARPKD.

[Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver : Worth knowing for clinical routine]

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive, quantitative, MRI-based method to evaluate liver stiffness. Beside biopsy and ultrasound elastography, this imaging method plays in many places a significant role in the detection and additive characterization of chronic liver disease.

OBJECTIVES, MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the literature, a brief review of the underlying method and the commercially available products is given. Furthermore, the practical procedure, the analysis, and the interpretation of clinically relevant questions are illustrated and a comparison with ultrasound elastography is provided.

RESULTS

This relative "young" MRI method allows extensive evaluation of mechanical properties of the liver and is an important diagnostic tool especially in follow-up examinations. The MRE of the liver is with a maximum technical failure rate of 5.8% a robust technique with high accuracy and an excellent re-test reliability as well as intra- and interobserver reproducibility. There is a high diagnostic certainty within the framework of most important clinical indications, the quantification of fibrosis, and with a very good correlation with the "gold standard" biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Based on its rising clinical relevance and the broad usage, MRE of the liver is increasingly used in many centers and in routine liver protocols. Therefore, basic knowledge of this method is essential for every radiologist.

MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives

Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis has evolved over the last couple of decades. Currently, elastography techniques are the most widely used non-invasive methods for clinical evaluation of chronic liver disease (CLD). MR elastography (MRE) of the liver has been used in the clinical practice for nearly a decade and continues to be widely accepted for detection and staging of liver fibrosis. With MRE, one can directly visualize propagating shear waves through the liver and an inversion algorithm in the scanner automatically converts the shear wave properties into an elastogram (stiffness map) on which liver stiffness can be calculated. The commonly used MRE method, two-dimensional gradient recalled echo (2D-GRE) sequence has produced excellent results in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in CLD from various etiologies and newer clinical indications continue to emerge. Advances in MRE technique, including 3D MRE, automated liver elasticity calculation, improvements in shear wave delivery and patient experience, are promising to provide a faster and more reliable MRE of liver. Innovations, including evaluation of mechanical parameters, such as loss modulus, displacement, and volumetric strain, are promising for comprehensive evaluation of CLD as well as understanding pathophysiology, and in differentiating various etiologies of CLD. In this review, the current status of the MRE of liver in CLD are outlined and followed by a brief description of advanced techniques and innovations in MRE of liver.

Reduction of breathing artifacts in multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the abdomen

PURPOSE

With abdominal magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) often suffering from breathing artifacts, it is recommended to perform MRE during breath-hold. However, breath-hold acquisition prohibits extended multifrequency MRE examinations and yields inconsistent results when patients cannot hold their breath. The purpose of this work was to analyze free-breathing strategies in multifrequency MRE of abdominal organs.

METHODS

Abdominal MRE with 30, 40, 50, and 60 Hz vibration frequencies and single-shot, multislice, full wave-field acquisition was performed four times in 11 healthy volunteers: once with multiple breath-holds and three times during free breathing with ungated, gated, and navigated slice adjustment. Shear wave speed maps were generated by tomoelastography inversion. Image registration was applied for correction of intrascan misregistration of image slices. Sharpness of features was quantified by the variance of the Laplacian.

RESULTS

Total scan times ranged from 120 seconds for ungated free-breathing MRE to 376 seconds for breath-hold examinations. As expected, free-breathing MRE resulted in larger organ displacements (liver, 4.7 ± 1.5 mm; kidneys, 2.4 ± 2.2 mm; spleen, 3.1 ± 2.4 mm; pancreas, 3.4 ± 1.4 mm) than breath-hold MRE (liver, 0.7 ± 0.2 mm; kidneys, 0.4 ± 0.2 mm; spleen, 0.5 ± 0.2 mm; pancreas, 0.7 ± 0.5 mm). Nonetheless, breathing-related displacement did not affect mean shear wave speed, which was consistent across all protocols (liver, 1.43 ± 0.07 m/s; kidneys, 2.35 ± 0.21 m/s; spleen, 2.02 ± 0.15 m/s; pancreas, 1.39 ± 0.15 m/s). Image registration before inversion improved the quality of free-breathing examinations, yielding no differences in image sharpness to uncorrected breath-hold MRE in most organs (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Overall, multifrequency MRE is robust to breathing when considering whole-organ values. Respiration-related blurring can readily be corrected using image registration. Consequently, ungated free-breathing MRE combined with image registration is recommended for multifrequency MRE of abdominal organs.