Multiparametric‐MRI ‐Based Radiomics Model for Differentiating Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma From Glioblastoma: Development and Cross‐Vendor Validation

Multicenter investigation of preoperative distinction between primary central nervous system lymphomas and glioblastomas through interpretable artificial intelligence models

OBJECTIVE

Research into the effectiveness and applicability of deep learning, radiomics, and their integrated models based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for preoperative differentiation between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) and Glioblastoma (GBM), along with an exploration of the interpretability of these models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on MRI images and clinical data from 261 patients across two medical centers. The data were split into a training set (n = 153, medical center 1) and an external test set (n = 108, medical center 2). Radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics to build the Radiomics Model. Deep learning networks, including the transformer-based MobileVIT Model and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) based ConvNeXt Model, were trained separately. By applying the "late fusion" theory, the radiomics model and deep learning model were fused to produce the optimal Max-Fusion Model. Additionally, Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Grad-CAM were employed for interpretability analysis.

RESULTS

In the external test set, the Radiomics Model achieved an Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86, the MobileVIT Model had an AUC of 0.91, the ConvNeXt Model demonstrated an AUC of 0.89, and the Max-Fusion Model showed an AUC of 0.92. The Delong test revealed a significant difference in AUC between the Max-Fusion Model and the Radiomics Model (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The Max-Fusion Model, combining different models, presents superior performance in distinguishing PCNSL and GBM, highlighting the effectiveness of model fusion for enhanced decision-making in medical applications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The preoperative non-invasive differentiation between PCNSL and GBM assists clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment regimens and clinical management strategies.

Prognostic Assessment in Patients With Primary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System Using MRI-Based Radiomics

BACKGROUND

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) carries a poor prognosis. Radiomics may hold potential value in prognostic assessment.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an MRI-based radiomics model and combine it with clinical factors to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with PCNSL.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective and prospective.

POPULATION

Three hundred seventy-nine patients (179 female, 53 ± 7 years) from 2014 to 2022.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, contrast-enhanced T1WI and diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging sequences on 3.0 T.

ASSESSMENT

Radiomics features were extracted from enhanced tumor regions on preoperative multi-sequence MRI. Using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model to select radiomic signatures in training cohort (N = 169). Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for clinical, radiomics, and combined models, with internal (N = 72) and external (N = 32) cohorts validating model performance.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, LASSO, Cox, decision curve analysis, time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic, area under the curve (AUC), and likelihood ratio test. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Follow-up duration was 28.79 ± 22.59 months (median: 25). High-risk patients, determined by the median radiomics score, showed significantly lower survival rates than low-risk patients. Compared with NCCN-IPI, conventional imaging and clinical models, the combined model achieved the highest C-index for both PFS (0.660 internal, 0.802 external) and OS (0.733 internal, 0.781 external) in validation. Net benefit was greater with radiomics than with clinical alone. The combined model exhibited performance with AUCs of 0.680, 0.752, and 0.830 for predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year PFS, and 0.770, 0.789, and 0.863 for OS in internal validation, with PFS AUCs of 0.860 and 0.826 and OS AUCs of 0.859 and 0.748 for 1-year and 3-year survival in external validation.

DATA CONCLUSION

Incorporating a multi-sequence MR-based radiomics model into clinical models enhances the assess accuracy for the prognosis of PCNSL.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Correlation of functional magnetic resonance imaging features of primary central nervous system lymphoma with vasculogenic mimicry and reticular fibers

Objective

To deepen the imaging-pathological mechanism of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and provide a theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment, the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) characteristics of PCNSL were analyzed, and the relationship between the fMRI characteristics and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and reticular fiber in PCNSL was discussed.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with PCNSL treated in our hospital were divided into three groups according to the pathological examination results, including strong positive group of VM (n = 40), weak positive group of VM (n = 56), strong positive group of reticular fiber (n = 45) and weak positive group of reticular fiber (n = 51). The levels of augmentation index and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were compared among the groups. receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to analyze the clinical value of ADC value in differential diagnosis of PCNSL.

Results

The levels of augmentation index in the strong positive group of VM were significantly higher than that in the weak positive group of VM, and the ADC value in the strong positive group of VM was significantly lower than that in the weak positive group of VM (P < 0.001). The levels of augmentation index in the strong positive group of reticular fiber were significantly higher than that in the weak positive group of reticular fiber, and ADC value in the strong positive group of reticular fiber was significantly lower than that in reticular fiber weak positive group (P < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the levels of augmentation index were positively correlated with VM and reticular fiber (r = 0.529, 0.548, P < 0.001) and the ADC value was negatively correlated with VM and reticular fiber (r = -0.485, -0.513, P < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between necrotic lesions and VM (r = -0.185, P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values of average ADC value, minimum ADC value, and maximum ADC value for individual differential diagnosis of PCNSL were 0.920, 0.901, and 0.702, while the AUC of the combined differential diagnosis was 0.985, with a sensitivity of 95.00 % and a specificity of 92.70 %.

Conclusion

The levels of augmentation index and the ADC value of PCNSL focus are significantly correlated with VM and reticular fiber, and there is a strong negative correlation between necrotic lesions and VM. MRI imaging technology is of great significance in revealing the biological behavior of PCNSL, which can effectively reveal the relationship between VM and reticular fibers and the MRI characteristics in PCNSL, thereby providing a new imaging basis for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL.

Machine learning-based pathomics signature of histology slides as a novel prognostic indicator in primary central nervous system lymphoma

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a pathomics signature for predicting the outcomes of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS

In this study, 132 whole-slide images (WSIs) of 114 patients with PCNSL were enrolled. Quantitative features of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides were extracted using CellProfiler. A pathomics signature was established and validated. Cox regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were performed to assess the significance and performance.

RESULTS

In total, 802 features were extracted using a fully automated pipeline. Six machine-learning classifiers demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing malignant neoplasms. The pathomics signature remained a significant factor of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the training cohort (OS: HR 7.423, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 2.143, p = 0.022) and independent validation cohort (OS: HR 4.204, p = 0.017; PFS: HR 3.243, p = 0.005). A significantly lower response rate to initial treatment was found in high Path-score group (19/35, 54.29%) as compared to patients in the low Path-score group (16/70, 22.86%; p < 0.001). The DCA and NRI analyses confirmed that the nomogram showed incremental performance compared with existing models. The ROC curve demonstrated a relatively sensitive and specific profile for the nomogram (1-, 2-, and 3-year AUC = 0.862, 0.932, and 0.927, respectively).

CONCLUSION

As a novel, non-invasive, and convenient approach, the newly developed pathomics signature is a powerful predictor of OS and PFS in PCNSL and might be a potential predictive indicator for therapeutic response.

How does deep learning/machine learning perform in comparison to radiologists in distinguishing glioblastomas (or grade IV astrocytomas) from primary CNS lymphomas?: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several studies have been published comparing deep learning (DL)/machine learning (ML) to radiologists in differentiating PCNSLs from GBMs with equivocal results. We aimed to perform this meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ML/DL versus radiologists in classifying PCNSL versus GBM using MRI.

METHODOLOGY

The study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data was extracted and interpreted by two researchers with 12 and 23 years' experience, respectively, and QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality and risk-bias assessment. We constructed contingency tables to derive sensitivity, specificity accuracy, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Our search identified 11 studies, of which 8 satisfied our inclusion criteria and restricted the analysis in each study to reporting the model showing highest accuracy, with a total sample size of 1159 patients. The random effects model showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 [95% CI:0.84-0.92] for ML and 0.82 [95% CI:0.76-0.87] for radiologists. Pooled specificity was 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84-0.91] for ML and 0.90 [95% CI: 0.81-0.95] for radiologists. Pooled accuracy was 0.88 [95% CI: 0.86-0.90] for ML and 0.86 [95% CI: 0.78-0.91] for radiologists. Pooled AUC of ML was 0.94 [95% CI:0.92-0.96]and for radiologists, it was 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.93].

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-based ML/DL techniques can complement radiologists to improve the accuracy of classifying GBMs from PCNSL, possibly reduce the need for a biopsy, and avoid any unwanted neurosurgical resection of a PCNSL.

The diagnostic value of multimodal imaging based on MR combined with ultrasound in benign and malignant breast diseases

We aimed to construct and validate a multimodality MRI combined with ultrasound based on radiomics for the evaluation of benign and malignant breast diseases. The preoperative enhanced MRI and ultrasound images of 131 patients with breast diseases confirmed by pathology in Aerospace Center Hospital from January 2021 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 73 benign diseases and 58 malignant diseases. Ultrasound and 3.0 T multiparameter MRI scans were performed in all patients. Then, all the data were divided into training set and validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Regions of interest were drawn layer by layer based on ultrasound and MR enhanced sequences to extract radiomics features. The optimal radiomic features were selected by the best feature screening method. Logistic Regression classifier was used to establish models according to the best features, including ultrasound model, MRI model, ultrasound combined with MRI model. The model efficacy was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The F-test based on ANOVA was used to screen out 20 best ultrasonic features, 11 best MR Features, and 14 best features from the combined model. Among them, texture features accounted for the largest proportion, accounting for 79%.The ultrasound combined with MR Image fusion model based on logistic regression classifier had the best diagnostic performance. The AUC of the training group and the validation group were 0.92 and 091, the sensitivity was 0.80 and 0.67, the specificity was 0.90 and 0.94, and the accuracy was 0.84 and 0.79, respectively. It was better than the simple ultrasound model (AUC of validation set was 0.82) or the simple MR model (AUC of validation set was 0.85). Compared with the traditional ultrasound or magnetic resonance diagnosis of breast diseases, the multimodal model of MRI combined with ultrasound based on radiomics can more accurately predict the benign and malignant breast diseases, thus providing a better basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Deep learning aided preoperative diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma

The preoperative distinction between glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) can be difficult, even for experts, but is highly relevant. We aimed to develop an easy-to-use algorithm, based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) to preoperatively discern PCNSL from GBM and systematically compare its performance to experienced neurosurgeons and radiologists. To this end, a CNN-based on DenseNet169 was trained with the magnetic resonance (MR)-imaging data of 68 PCNSL and 69 GBM patients and its performance compared to six trained experts on an external test set of 10 PCNSL and 10 GBM. Our neural network predicted PCNSL with an accuracy of 80% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.8, exceeding the accuracy achieved by clinicians (73%, NPV 0.77). Combining expert rating with automated diagnosis in those cases where experts dissented yielded an accuracy of 95%. Our approach has the potential to significantly augment the preoperative radiological diagnosis of PCNSL.

Balanced transformer: efficient classification of glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma

Objective.Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) are malignant primary brain tumors with different biological characteristics. Great differences exist between the treatment strategies of PCNSL and GBM. Thus, accurately distinguishing between PCNSL and GBM before surgery is very important for guiding neurosurgery. At present, the spinal fluid of patients is commonly extracted to find tumor markers for diagnosis. However, this method not only causes secondary injury to patients, but also easily delays treatment. Although diagnosis using radiology images is non-invasive, the morphological features and texture features of the two in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are quite similar, making distinction with human eyes and image diagnosis very difficult. In order to solve the problem of insufficient number of samples and sample imbalance, we used data augmentation and balanced sample sampling methods. Conventional Transformer networks use patch segmentation operations to divide images into small patches, but the lack of communication between patches leads to unbalanced data layers.Approach.To address this problem, we propose a balanced patch embedding approach that extracts high-level semantic information by reducing the feature dimensionality and maintaining the geometric variation invariance of the features. This approach balances the interactions between the information and improves the representativeness of the data. To further address the imbalance problem, the balanced patch partition method is proposed to increase the receptive field by sampling the four corners of the sliding window and introducing a linear encoding component without increasing the computational effort, and designed a new balanced loss function.Main results.Benefiting from the overall balance design, we conducted an experiment using Balanced Transformer and obtained an accuracy of 99.89%, sensitivity of 99.74%, specificity of 99.73% and AUC of 99.19%, which is far higher than the previous results (accuracy of 89.6% ∼ 96.8%, sensitivity of 74.3% ∼ 91.3%, specificity of 88.9% ∼ 96.02% and AUC of 87.8% ∼ 94.9%).Significance.This study can accurately distinguish PCNSL and GBM before surgery. Because GBM is a common type of malignant tumor, the 1% improvement in accuracy has saved many patients and reduced treatment times considerably. Thus, it can provide doctors with a good basis for auxiliary diagnosis.

Radiomics for differentiation of gliomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Numerous radiomics-based models have been proposed to discriminate between central nervous system (CNS) gliomas and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). Given the heterogeneity of the existing models, we aimed to define their overall performance and identify the most critical variables to pilot future algorithms.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis were conducted, encompassing 12 studies and a total of 1779 patients, focusing on radiomics to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Overall sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were estimated. Event rates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, and the heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 test.

Results

The overall SEN and SPE for differentiation between CNS gliomas and PCNSLs were 88% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91) and 87% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91), respectively. The best-performing features were the ones extracted from the Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM; ACC 97%), followed by those obtained from the Neighboring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM; ACC 93%), and shape-based features (ACC 91%). The 18F-FDG-PET/CT was the best-performing imaging modality (ACC 97%), followed by the MRI CE-T1W (ACC 87% - 95%). Most studies applied a cross-validation analysis (92%).

Conclusion

The current SEN and SPE of radiomics to discriminate CNS gliomas from PCNSLs are high, making radiomics a helpful method to differentiate these tumor types. The best-performing features are the GLRLM, NGTDM, and shape-based features. The 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging modality is the best-performing, while the MRI CE-T1W is the most used.

Fully automated MR-based virtual biopsy of primary CNS lymphomas

Background

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) pose a challenge as they may mimic gliomas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging, compelling precise differentiation for appropriate treatment. This study focuses on developing an automated MRI-based workflow to distinguish between PCNSL and gliomas.

Methods

MRI examinations of 240 therapy-naive patients (141 males and 99 females, mean age: 55.16 years) with cerebral gliomas and PCNSLs (216 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs), each comprising a non-contrast T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequence were included in the study. HD-GLIO, a pre-trained segmentation network, was used to generate segmentations automatically. To validate the segmentation efficiency, 237 manual segmentations were prepared (213 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs). Subsequently, radiomics features were extracted following feature selection and training of an XGBoost algorithm for classification.

Results

The segmentation models for gliomas and PCNSLs achieved a mean Sørensen-Dice coefficient of 0.82 and 0.80 for whole tumors, respectively. Three classification models were developed in this study to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. The first model differentiated PCNSLs from gliomas, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (F1-score: 0.75). The second model discriminated between high-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.91 (F1-score: 0.6), and the third model differentiated between low-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.95 (F1-score: 0.89).

Conclusions

This study serves as a pilot investigation presenting an automated virtual biopsy workflow that distinguishes PCNSLs from cerebral gliomas. Prior to clinical use, it is necessary to validate the results in a prospective multicenter setting with a larger number of PCNSL patients.

Application of machine learning in the management of lymphoma: Current practice and future prospects

In the past decade, digitization of medical records and multiomics data analysis in lymphoma has led to the accessibility of high-dimensional records. The digitization of medical records, the visualization of extensive volume data extracted from medical images, and the integration of multiomics methods into clinical decision-making have produced many datasets. As a promising auxiliary tool, machine learning (ML) intends to extract homologous features in large-scale data sets and encode them into various patterns to complete complicated tasks. At present, artificial intelligence and digital mining have shown promising prospects in the field of lymphoma pathological image analysis. The paradigm shift from qualitative analysis to quantitative analysis makes the pathological diagnosis more intelligent and the results more accurate and objective. ML can promote accurate lymphoma diagnosis and provide patients with prognostic information and more individualized treatment options. Based on the above, this comprehensive review of the general workflow of ML highlights recent advances in ML techniques in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of lymphoma, and clarifies the boundedness and future orientation of the ML technique in the clinical practice of lymphoma.

Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm for predicting diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered, H3 K27 wild-type high-grade glioma, and primary CNS lymphoma of the brain midline in adults

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative diagnosis of diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered (DMG-A) and midline high-grade glioma without H3 K27 alteration (DMG-W), as well as midline primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) in adults, is challenging but crucial. The aim of this study was to develop a model for predicting these three entities using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with DMG-A, 35 with DMG-W, and 35 with midline PCNSL were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. Two radiologists evaluated the conventional MRI features of the tumors, such as shape. Patient age, tumor volume, and conventional MRI features were considered clinical features. The data set was randomly stratified into 70% training and 30% testing cohorts. Predictive models based on the clinical features, radiomics features, and integration of clinical and radiomics features were established through ML. The performances of the models were evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Subsequently, 10 patients with DMG-A, 10 with DMG-W, and 12 with PCNSL were enrolled from another institution to validate the established models.

RESULTS

The predictive models based on clinical features, radiomics features, and the integration of clinical and radiomics features through the support vector machine algorithm had the optimal accuracies in the training, testing, and validation cohorts, and the accuracies in the testing cohort were 0.871, 0.892, and 0.903, respectively. Age, 2 radiomics features, and 3 conventional MRI features were the 6 most significant features in the established integrated model.

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated prediction model established by ML provides high discriminatory accuracy for predicting DMG-A, DMG-W, and midline PCNSL in adults.

Radiomics characterization of tissues in an animal brain tumor model imaged using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI

Here, we investigate radiomics-based characterization of tumor vascular and microenvironmental properties in an orthotopic rat brain tumor model measured using dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Thirty-two immune compromised-RNU rats implanted with human U-251N cancer cells were imaged using DCE-MRI (7Tesla, Dual-Gradient-Echo). The aim was to perform pharmacokinetic analysis using a nested model (NM) selection technique to classify brain regions according to vasculature properties considered as the source of truth. A two-dimensional convolutional-based radiomics analysis was performed on the raw-DCE-MRI of the rat brains to generate dynamic radiomics maps. The raw-DCE-MRI and respective radiomics maps were used to build 28 unsupervised Kohonen self-organizing-maps (K-SOMs). A Silhouette-Coefficient (SC), k-fold Nested-Cross-Validation (k-fold-NCV), and feature engineering analyses were performed on the K-SOMs' feature spaces to quantify the distinction power of radiomics features compared to raw-DCE-MRI for classification of different Nested Models. Results showed that eight radiomics features outperformed respective raw-DCE-MRI in prediction of the three nested models. The average percent difference in SCs between radiomics features and raw-DCE-MRI was: 29.875% ± 12.922%, p < 0.001. This work establishes an important first step toward spatiotemporal characterization of brain regions using radiomics signatures, which is fundamental toward staging of tumors and evaluation of tumor response to different treatments.

Identification and validation of radiomic features from computed tomography for preoperative classification of neuroblastic tumors in children

BACKGROUND

To identify radiomic features that can predict the pathological type of neuroblastic tumor in children.

METHODS

Data on neuroblastic tumors in 104 children were retrospectively analyzed. There were 14 cases of ganglioneuroma, 24 cases of ganglioneuroblastoma, and 65 cases of neuroblastoma. Stratified sampling was used to randomly allocate the cases into the training and validation sets in a ratio of 3:1. The maximum relevance-minimum redundancy algorithm was used to identify the top 10 of two clinical features and 851 radiomic features in portal venous-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to classify tumors in two binary steps: first as ganglioneuroma compared to the other two types, then as ganglioneuroblastoma compared to neuroblastoma.

RESULTS

Based on 10 clinical-radiomic features, the classifier identified ganglioneuroma compared to the other two tumor types in the validation dataset with sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 81.8%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.875. The classifier identified ganglioneuroblastoma versus neuroblastoma with a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 87.5%, and an AUC of 0.854. The overall accuracy of the classifier across all three types of tumors was 80.8%.

CONCLUSION

Radiomic features can help predict the pathological type of neuroblastic tumors in children.

Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Rare Cancer: A Case Study for Primary CNS Lymphoma Patients

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Although therapeutic progresses have significantly improved Overall Survival (OS), a number of patients do not respond to HD–MTX-based chemotherapy (15–25%) or experience relapse (25–50%) after an initial response. The reasons underlying this poor response to therapy are unknown. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop improved predictive models for PCNSL. In this study, we investigated whether radiomics features can improve outcome prediction in patients with PCNSL. A total of 80 patients diagnosed with PCNSL were enrolled. A patient sub-group, with complete Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) series, were selected for the stratification analysis. Following radiomics feature extraction and selection, different Machine Learning (ML) models were tested for OS and Progression-free Survival (PFS) prediction. To assess the stability of the selected features, images from 23 patients scanned at three different time points were used to compute the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and to evaluate the reproducibility of each feature for both original and normalized images. Features extracted from Z-score normalized images were significantly more stable than those extracted from non-normalized images with an improvement of about 38% on average (p-value < 10−12). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) showed that radiomics-based prediction overcame prediction based on current clinical prognostic factors with an improvement of 23% for OS and 50% for PFS, respectively. These results indicate that radiomics features extracted from normalized MR images can improve prognosis stratification of PCNSL patients and pave the way for further study on its potential role to drive treatment choice.

Progress of radiological‑pathological workflows in the differential diagnosis between primary central nervous system lymphoma and high‑grade glioma (Review)

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and high‑grade glioma (HGG) are distinct entities of the CNS with completely distinct treatments. The treatment of PCNSL is chemotherapy‑based, while surgery is the first choice for HGG. However, the clinical features of the two entities often overlap, and a clear pathological diagnosis is important for subsequent management, especially for the management of PCNSL. Stereotactic biopsy is recognized as one of the minimally invasive alternatives for evaluating the involvement of the CNS. However, in the case of limited tissue materials, the differential diagnosis between the two entities is still difficult. In addition, some patients are too ill to tolerate a needle biopsy. Therefore, combining imaging, histopathology and laboratory examinations is essential in order to make a clear diagnosis as soon as possible. The present study reviews the progress of comparative research on both imaging and laboratory tests based on the pathophysiological changes of the two entities, and proposes an integrative and optimized diagnostic process, with the purpose of building a better understanding for neurologists, hematologists, radiologists and pathologists.

Preoperative CECT-based Radiomic Signature for Predicting the Response of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficiency of radiomics signatures in predicting the response of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy based on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

MATERIALS

This study consisted of 111 patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent CECT at both the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) before and after TACE. According to mRECIST 1.1, patients were divided into an objective-response group (n = 38) and a non-response group (n = 73). Among them, 79 patients were assigned as the training dataset, and the remaining 32 cases were assigned as the test dataset.

METHODS

Radiomics features were extracted from CECT images. Two feature ranking methods and three classifiers were used to find the best single-phase radiomics signatures for both AP and VP on the training set. Meanwhile, multi-phase radiomics signatures were built upon integration of images from two CECT phases by decision-level fusion and feature-level fusion. Finally, multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a nomogram by combining radiomics signatures and clinic-radiologic characteristics. The prediction performance was evaluated by AUC on the test dataset.

RESULTS

The multi-phase radiomics signature (AUC = 0.883) performed better in predicting TACE therapy response compared to the best single-phase radiomics signature (AUC = 0.861). The nomogram (AUC = 0.913) showed better performance than any radiomics signatures.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics signatures and nomogram were developed and validated for predicting responses to TACE therapy, and the radiomics model may play a positive role in identifying patients who may benefit from TACE therapy in clinical practice.

A Survey of Radiomics in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Gliomas

Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the adult central nervous system (CNS), which mostly shows invasive growth. In most cases, surgery is often difficult to completely remove, and the recurrence rate and mortality of patients are high. With the continuous development of molecular genetics and the great progress of molecular biology technology, more and more molecular biomarkers have been proved to have important guiding significance in the individualized diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation of glioma. With the updates of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the CNS in 2021, the diagnosis and treatment of glioma has entered the era of precision medicine in the true sense. Due to its ability to non-invasively achieve accurate identification of glioma from other intracranial tumors, and to predict the grade, genotyping, treatment response, and prognosis of glioma, which provides a scientific basis for the clinical application of individualized diagnosis and treatment model of glioma, radiomics has become a research hotspot in the field of precision medicine. This paper reviewed the research related to radiomics of adult gliomas published in recent years and summarized the research proceedings of radiomics in differential diagnosis, preoperative grading and genotyping, treatment and efficacy evaluation, and survival prediction of adult gliomas.

A Systematic Review of the Current Status and Quality of Radiomics for Glioma Differential Diagnosis

Simple Summary

Gliomas can be difficult to discern clinically and radiologically from other brain lesions (either neoplastic or non-neoplastic) since their clinical manifestations as well as preoperative imaging features often overlap and appear misleading. Radiomics could be extremely helpful for non-invasive glioma differential diagnosis (DDx). However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. In this context, we aimed to summarize the current status and quality of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx in a systematic review. In total, 42 studies were selected and examined in our work. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Abstract

Radiomics is a promising tool that may increase the value of imaging in differential diagnosis (DDx) of glioma. However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the current status of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx, also using the radiomics quality score (RQS) to assess the quality of the methodology used in each study. A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles focused on the use of radiomics for glioma DDx from 2015. Methodological quality was assessed using the RQS tool. Spearman’s correlation (ρ) analysis was performed to explore whether RQS was correlated with journal metrics and the characteristics of the studies. Finally, 42 articles were selected for the systematic qualitative analysis. Selected articles were grouped and summarized in terms of those on DDx between glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma, those aiming at differentiating glioma from brain metastases, and those based on DDx of glioma and other brain diseases. Median RQS was 8.71 out 36, with a mean RQS of all studies of 24.21%. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

An Update on Neurosurgical Management of Primary CNS Lymphoma in Immunocompetent Patients

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) are rare CNS tumors that harbor a conspicuously longer diagnostic delay compared to other malignant brain tumors. The gold standard for diagnosis is stereotactic biopsy to acquire tissue for histopathological analysis and therefore neurosurgery plays a central role when reducing the diagnostic period is mandated. However, histopathological diagnosis could be complicated if the patient was preoperatively exposed to corticosteroids. Besides the histopathological result, diagnosis of a PCNSL also requires full diagnostic workup to exclude cerebral metastatic disease of a systemic lymphoma. Most reviews of PCNSL discuss recent advancements in systemic treatment options from an (neuro-)oncologic viewpoint, whereas our intention was to discuss the optimization of the diagnostic period and therefore describe current standards of imaging, summarizing the diagnostic workup, discussing the surgical workup and future diagnostic prospects as well as the influence of preoperative corticosteroid therapy to reduce the diagnostic delay of PCNSL patients.

Machine Learning in Differentiating Gliomas from Primary CNS Lymphomas: A Systematic Review, Reporting Quality, and Risk of Bias Assessment

BACKGROUND

Differentiating gliomas and primary CNS lymphoma represents a diagnostic challenge with important therapeutic ramifications. Biopsy is the preferred method of diagnosis, while MR imaging in conjunction with machine learning has shown promising results in differentiating these tumors.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the quality of reporting and risk of bias, assess data bases with which the machine learning classification algorithms were developed, the algorithms themselves, and their performance.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

From 11,727 studies, 23 peer-reviewed studies used machine learning to differentiate primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas in 2276 patients.

DATA ANALYSIS

Characteristics of data sets and machine learning algorithms were extracted. A meta-analysis on a subset of studies was performed. Reporting quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) and Prediction Model Study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.961) and accuracy (91.2%) in external validation were achieved by logistic regression and support vector machines models using conventional radiomic features. Meta-analysis of machine learning classifiers using these features yielded a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.944 (95% CI, 0.898-0.99). The median TRIPOD score was 51.7%. The risk of bias was high for 16 studies.

LIMITATIONS

Exclusion of abstracts decreased the sensitivity in evaluating all published studies. Meta-analysis had high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning-based methods of differentiating primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas have shown great potential, but most studies lack large, balanced data sets and external validation. Assessment of the studies identified multiple deficiencies in reporting quality and risk of bias. These factors reduce the generalizability and reproducibility of the findings.

Beyond Glioma: The Utility of Radiomic Analysis for Non-Glial Intracranial Tumors

Simple Summary

Tumor qualities, such as growth rate, firmness, and intrusion into healthy tissue, can be very important for operation planning and further treatment. Radiomics is a promising new method that allows the determination of some of these qualities on images performed before surgery. In this article, we provide a review of the use of radiomics in various tumors of the central nervous system, such as metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

Abstract

The field of radiomics is rapidly expanding and gaining a valuable role in neuro-oncology. The possibilities related to the use of radiomic analysis, such as distinguishing types of malignancies, predicting tumor grade, determining the presence of particular molecular markers, consistency, therapy response, and prognosis, can considerably influence decision-making in medicine in the near future. Even though the main focus of radiomic analyses has been on glial CNS tumors, studies on other intracranial tumors have shown encouraging results. Therefore, as the main focus of this review, we performed an analysis of publications on PubMed and Web of Science databases, focusing on radiomics in CNS metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

Progress of MRI Radiomics in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Although the diagnostic scheme of HCC is currently undergoing refinement, the prognosis of HCC is still not satisfactory. In addition to certain factors, such as tumor size and number and vascular invasion displayed on traditional imaging, some histopathological features and gene expression parameters are also important for the prognosis of HCC patients. However, most parameters are based on postoperative pathological examinations, which cannot help with preoperative decision-making. As a new field, radiomics extracts high-throughput imaging data from different types of images to build models and predict clinical outcomes noninvasively before surgery, rendering it a powerful aid for making personalized treatment decisions preoperatively.

Objective

This study reviewed the workflow of radiomics and the research progress on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Methods

A literature review was conducted by searching PubMed for search of relevant peer-reviewed articles published from May 2017 to June 2021.The search keywords included HCC, MRI, radiomics, deep learning, artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural network, texture analysis, diagnosis, histopathology, microvascular invasion, surgical resection, radiofrequency, recurrence, relapse, transarterial chemoembolization, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, therapeutic response, and prognosis.

Results

Radiomics features on MRI can be used as biomarkers to determine the differential diagnosis, histological grade, microvascular invasion status, gene expression status, local and systemic therapeutic responses, and prognosis of HCC patients.

Conclusion

Radiomics is a promising new imaging method. MRI radiomics has high application value in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Preoperative differentiation of serous cystic neoplasms from mucin-producing pancreatic cystic neoplasms using a CT-based radiomics nomogram

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a CT-based radiomics nomogram in preoperative differential diagnosis of SCNs from mucin-producing PCNs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 89 patients consisting of 31 SCNs, 30 IPMNs, and 28 MCNs who underwent preoperative CT were analyzed. A total of 710 radiomics features were extracted from each case. Patients were divided into training (n = 63) and validation cohorts (n = 26) with a ratio of 7:3. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method and logistic regression analysis were used for feature selection and model construction. A nomogram was created from a comprehensive model consisting of clinical features and the fusion radiomics signature. A decision curve analysis was used for clinical decisions.

RESULTS

The radiomics features extracted from CT could assist with the differentiation of SCNs from mucin-producing PCNs in both the training and validation cohorts. The signature of the combination of the plain, late arterial, and venous phases had the largest areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.960 (95% CI 0.910-1) in the training cohort and 0.817 (95% CI 0.651-0.983) in the validation cohort with good calibration. The value and efficacy of the nomogram was verified using decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive nomogram incorporating clinical features and fusion radiomics signature can differentiate SCNs from mucin-producing PCNs.

Radiomic Based Machine Learning Performance for a Three Class Problem in Neuro-Oncology: Time to Test the Waters?

Prior radiomics studies have focused on two-class brain tumor classification, which limits generalizability. The performance of radiomics in differentiating the three most common malignant brain tumors (glioblastoma (GBM), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and metastatic disease) is assessed; factors affecting the model performance and usefulness of a single sequence versus multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) remain largely unaddressed. This retrospective study included 253 patients (120 metastatic (lung and brain), 40 PCNSL, and 93 GBM). Radiomic features were extracted for whole a tumor mask (enhancing plus necrotic) and an edema mask (first pipeline), as well as for separate enhancing and necrotic and edema masks (second pipeline). Model performance was evaluated using MP-MRI, individual sequences, and the T1 contrast enhanced (T1-CE) sequence without the edema mask across 45 model/feature selection combinations. The second pipeline showed significantly high performance across all combinations (Brier score: 0.311-0.325). GBRM fit using the full feature set from the T1-CE sequence was the best model. The majority of the top models were built using a full feature set and inbuilt feature selection. No significant difference was seen between the top-performing models for MP-MRI (AUC 0.910) and T1-CE sequence with (AUC 0.908) and without edema masks (AUC 0.894). T1-CE is the single best sequence with comparable performance to that of multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI). Model performance varies based on tumor subregion and the combination of model/feature selection methods.

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Peritumoral Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of the Presence of Extracapsular Extension With Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative prediction of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer (PCa) is important to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient prognosis.

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based peritumoral radiomics for preoperative prediction of the presence of ECE.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Two hundred eighty-four patients with PCa from two centers (center 1: 226 patients; center 2: 58 patients). Cases from center 1 were randomly divided into training (158 patients) and internal validation (68 patients) sets. Cases from center 2 were assigned to the external validation set.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T MRI scanners (three vendors). Sequence: Pelvic T2-weighted turbo/fast spin echo sequence and diffusion weighted echo planar imaging sequence.

ASSESSMENT

The peritumoral region (PTR) was obtained by 3-12 mm (half of the tumor length) 3D dilatation of the intratumoral region (ITR). Single-MRI radiomics signatures, mpMRI radiomics signatures, and integrated models, which combined clinical characteristics with the radiomics signatures were built. The discrimination ability was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the internal and external validation sets.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U-test, DeLong test.

RESULTS

The PTR radiomics signatures demonstrated significantly better performance than the corresponding ITR radiomics signatures (AUC: 0.674 vs. 0.554, P < 0.05 on T2-weighted, 0.652 vs. 0.546, P < 0.05 on apparent diffusion coefficient, 0.682 vs. 0.556 on mpMRI in the external validation set). The integrated models combining the PTR radiomics signature with clinical characteristics performed better than corresponding radiomics signatures in the internal validation set (eg. AUC: 0.718 vs. 0.671, P < 0.05 on mpMRI) but performed similar in the external validation set (eg. AUC: 0.684, vs. 0.682, P = 0.45 on mpMRI).

DATA CONCLUSION

The peritumoral radiomics can better predict the presence of ECE preoperatively compared with the intratumoral radiomics and may have better generalization than clinical characteristics. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 2.

Radiomics-Based Differentiation between Glioblastoma, CNS Lymphoma, and Brain Metastases: Comparing Performance across MRI Sequences and Machine Learning Models

Prior radiomics studies have focused on two-class brain tumor classification, which limits generalizability. The performance of radiomics in differentiating the three most common malignant brain tumors (glioblastoma (GBM), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and metastatic disease) is assessed; factors affecting the model performance and usefulness of a single sequence versus multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) remain largely unaddressed. This retrospective study included 253 patients (120 metastatic (lung and brain), 40 PCNSL, and 93 GBM). Radiomic features were extracted for whole a tumor mask (enhancing plus necrotic) and an edema mask (first pipeline), as well as for separate enhancing and necrotic and edema masks (second pipeline). Model performance was evaluated using MP-MRI, individual sequences, and the T1 contrast enhanced (T1-CE) sequence without the edema mask across 45 model/feature selection combinations. The second pipeline showed significantly high performance across all combinations (Brier score: 0.311–0.325). GBRM fit using the full feature set from the T1-CE sequence was the best model. The majority of the top models were built using a full feature set and inbuilt feature selection. No significant difference was seen between the top-performing models for MP-MRI (AUC 0.910) and T1-CE sequence with (AUC 0.908) and without edema masks (AUC 0.894). T1-CE is the single best sequence with comparable performance to that of multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI). Model performance varies based on tumor subregion and the combination of model/feature selection methods.

Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: a comparison of diagnostic performance across different MRI sequences and machine learning techniques

OBJECTIVES

Despite the robust diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomic features for differentiating between glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) reported on prior studies, the best sequence or a combination of sequences and model performance across various machine learning pipelines remain undefined. Herein, we compare the diagnostic performance of multiple radiomics-based models to differentiate GBM from PCNSL.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included 94 patients (34 with PCNSL and 60 with GBM). Model performance was assessed using various MRI sequences across 45 possible model and feature selection combinations for nine different sequence permutations. Predictive performance was assessed using fivefold repeated cross-validation with five repeats. The best and worst performing models were compared to assess differences in performance.

RESULTS

The predictive performance, both using individual and a combination of sequences, was fairly robust across multiple top performing models (AUC: 0.961-0.977) but did show considerable variation between the best and worst performing models. The top performing individual sequences had comparable performance to multiparametric models. The best prediction model in our study used a combination of ADC, FLAIR, and T1-CE achieving the highest AUC of 0.977, while the second ranked model used T1-CE and ADC, achieving a cross-validated AUC of 0.975.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics-based predictive accuracy can vary considerably, based on the model and feature selection methods as well as the combination of sequences used. Also, models derived from limited sequences show performance comparable to those derived from all five sequences.

KEY POINTS

• Radiomics-based diagnostic performance of various machine learning models for differentiating glioblastoma and PCNSL varies considerably. • ML models using limited or multiple MRI sequences can provide comparable performance, based on the chosen model. • Embedded feature selection models perform better than models using a priori feature reduction.

Deep Learning for Automatic Differential Diagnosis of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma: Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Convolutional Neural Network Model

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) is useful to guide treatment strategies.

PURPOSE

To investigate the use of a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for differentiation of PCNSL and GBM without tumor delineation.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 289 patients with PCNSL (136) or GBM (153) were included, the average age of the cohort was 54 years, and there were 173 men and 116 women.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0 T Axial contrast-enhanced T₁ -weighted spin-echo inversion recovery sequence (CE-T₁ WI), T₂ -weighted fluid-attenuation inversion recovery sequence (FLAIR), and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI, b = 0 second/mm² , 1000 seconds/mm² ).

ASSESSMENT

A single-parametric CNN model was built using CE-T₁ WI, FLAIR, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map derived from DWI, respectively. A decision-level fusion based multi-parametric CNN model (DF-CNN) was built by combining the predictions of single-parametric CNN models through logistic regression. An image-level fusion based multi-parametric CNN model (IF-CNN) was built using the integrated multi-parametric MR images. The radiomics models were developed. The diagnoses by three radiologists with 6 years (junior radiologist Y.Y.), 11 years (intermediate-level radiologist Y.T.), and 21 years (senior radiologist Y.L.) of experience were obtained.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The 5-fold cross validation was used for model evaluation. The Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare the accuracies. U-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The CE-T₁ WI, FLAIR, and ADC based single-parametric CNN model had accuracy of 0.884, 0.782, and 0.700, respectively. The DF-CNN model had an accuracy of 0.899 which was higher than the IF-CNN model (0.830, P = 0.021), but had no significant difference in accuracy compared to the radiomics model (0.865, P = 0.255), and the senior radiologist (0.906, P = 0.886).

DATA CONCLUSION

A CNN model can differentiate PCNSL from GBM without tumor delineation, and comparable to the radiomics models and radiologists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.