1
|
Moser R, Mayr NA, Nano J, Behzadi ST, Kiesl S, Combs SE, Borm KJ. A survey of cancer patients' interest in undertaking exercise to promote relaxation during radiotherapy for breast cancer and metastatic cancer. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:68. [PMID: 38822369 PMCID: PMC11143565 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02459-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 25-50% of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) experience psychological distress and anxiety, which can detrimentally affect both their quality of life and treatment outcomes. While previous research has demonstrated that relaxation exercises can enhance the tolerability of RT and alleviate associated stress and anxiety, the specific needs for such therapies in radiation oncology remain under-explored. This study aims to investigate the demand for and preferences toward relaxation exercises among radiotherapy patients, addressing a critical gap in patient-centered care. METHODS A prospective pseudonymized survey study using a one-time paper-based questionnaire was conducted from 2022 to 2023 among patients undergoing curative-intent RT for breast cancer or patients undergoing palliative RT for bone metastases. Patients were asked in a 11-item questionnaire about their anxiety, pre-existing practice of relaxation exercises/interventions, their interest in relaxation exercises, and preferences on the type and format of instruction. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS 100 patients (74 female and 26 male) responded, of whom 68 received curative-intent adjuvant RT and 32 palliative RT. Median age was 62 years. 78% of patients indicated a desire to be actively involved in their radiotherapy, but only 27% had used relaxation exercises prior to RT. 44.8% of both curatively and palliatively treated patients who wanted to be actively involved in their therapy desired to learn how to best relax. 56.4% of respondents were willing to spend extra time learning offered exercises. CONCLUSION The survey indicates that patients undergoing RT, both for curative or palliative intent, desire relaxation exercises to relieve stress and anxiety from RT. It is therefore important to assess the need for relaxation interventions in individual patients and to develop suitable programs or collaborate with other healthcare professionals to meet these needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Moser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Nina A Mayr
- School of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Jana Nano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie T Behzadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophia Kiesl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (dktk), Partner Site Munich, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai J Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wood L, Holman R, Nguyen U, Nguyen H, Senaratna A, Adams M, Apath A. Patient Education Materials for Immobilisation Masks in Radiation Therapy for Adult Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2024:10.1007/s13187-024-02436-7. [PMID: 38592655 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02436-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Immobilisation masks (IMs) are used for people with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiation therapy (RT) treatment to ensure accuracy and reproducibility between treatments. Claustrophobia-related mask anxiety in HNC patients is common and can compromise treatment due to patient distress. This scoping review aimed to describe the content of publicly available Patient Education Materials (PEMs) for people with HNC undergoing RT. Three search engines (Bing, Yahoo, and Google) were systematically searched using standard terms. PEMs in audio-visual or written formats were eligible for inclusion if the target readership was adults with HNC and included content on IMs for RT. Content was appraised using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable and Audio-Visual Materials to assess understandability and actionability. In total, 304 PEMs were identified of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen PEMs were webpages, three were PDF format, and one was a standalone video. The understandability and actionability of PEMs ranged between 47 to 100% and 0 to 80%, respectively. PEMs authored by Foundations/Organisations scored higher in understandability (80-100%) and were more likely to discuss mask anxiety coping strategies. In comparison, News sites and IM manufacturers published PEMs with the lowest understandability scores (20-80%). The significant variations in the quality of IM PEMs identified suggest that some sources may be more effective at informing patients about IMs. Although multiple aspects of the PEMs were consistent across the reviewed materials, many PEMs lacked information, and a stronger focus on understandability and actionability is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Wood
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Ruby Holman
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Uyen Nguyen
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Nguyen
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Aurora Senaratna
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Misha Adams
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Apajok Apath
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Forbes E, Clover K, Oultram S, Wratten C, Kumar M, Tieu MT, Carter G, McCarter K, Britton B, Baker AL. Situational anxiety in head and neck cancer: Rates, patterns and clinical management interventions in a regional cancer setting. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71:100-109. [PMID: 37888792 PMCID: PMC10920933 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research indicates that the immobilisation mask required for radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancers can provoke intense anxiety. However, little is known about the rates of this anxiety, whether it changes over a course of treatment and how it is managed in clinical practice. This study aimed to describe the rates and patterns of situational anxiety in patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer and the use of anxiety management interventions in current clinical practice in a major regional cancer setting in New South Wales, Australia. METHODS Situational anxiety rates and patterns were assessed at five time points using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory prior to treatment planning (SIM), the first three treatment sessions (Tx 1, Tx 2 and Tx 3) and treatment 20 (Tx 20). Sessions were observed to record the use of general supportive interventions (music and support person) and anxiety-specific interventions (break from the mask, relaxation techniques and anxiolytic medication). Sociodemographic and clinical information was extracted from the medical record. RESULTS One hundred and one patients were recruited. One-third had clinically significant anxiety at any of the first three time points (33.3-40%), and a quarter at Tx 3 (26.4%) and Tx 20 (23.4%). Of the sample, 55.4% had available data for categorisation into one of four pattern groups: 'No Anxiety' (46.4%); 'Decreasing Anxiety' (35.7%); 'Increasing Anxiety' (7.1%); and 'Stable High Anxiety' (10.7%). Most participants had social support present at SIM (53.5%) and listened to music during treatment (86.7-92.9%). Few participants received relaxation techniques alone (1.2-2.3%). Anxiolytic medication was provided for 10% of patients at some stage during the treatment journey and 5% required a break from the mask at SIM, with frequency decreasing throughout the treatment course. CONCLUSIONS In this regional cancer setting, situational anxiety was common, but generally decreased throughout treatment. Some patients experience persistent or increasing anxiety, with up to 10% of patients receiving specific anxiety management interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Forbes
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kerrie Clover
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- PsychoOncology Service, Department of Consultation Liaison PsychiatryCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Sharon Oultram
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Chris Wratten
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mahesh Kumar
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Minh Thi Tieu
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Gregory Carter
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Consultation Liaison PsychiatryCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kristen McCarter
- School of Psychological Sciences, College of Science, Engineering and EnvironmentUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ben Britton
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Hunter New England Mental Health ServicesNewcastleNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Amanda L. Baker
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ben Bouchta Y, Gardner M, Sengupta C, Johnson J, Keall P. The Remove-the-Mask Open-Source head and neck Surface-Guided radiation therapy system. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100541. [PMID: 38327762 PMCID: PMC10847032 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) for head and neck radiotherapy is challenging as obstructions are common and non-rigid facial motion can compromise surface accuracy. The purpose of this work was to develop and benchmark the Remove the Mask (RtM) SGRT system, an open-source system especially designed to address the challenges faced in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods The accuracy of the RtM SGRT system was benchmarked using a head phantom positioned on a robotic motion platform capable of sub-millimetre accuracy which was used to induce unidirectional shifts and to reproduce three real head motion traces. We also assessed the accuracy of the system in ten humans volunteers. The ground truth motion of the volunteers was obtained using a commercial motion capture system with an accuracy < 0.3 mm. Results The mean tracking error of the RtM SGRT system for the ten volunteers was of -0.1 ± 0.4 mm -0.6 ± 0.6 mm and 0.3 ± 0.2 mm, and 0.0 ± 0.2° 0.0 ± 0.1° and 0.0 ± 0.2° for translations and rotations along the left-right, superior-inferior and anterior-posterior axes respectively and we also found similar results in measurements with the head phantom. Forced facial motion was associated with lower tracking accuracy. The RtM SGRT system achieved submillimetre accuracy. Conclusion The RtM SGRT system is a low-cost, easy to build and open-source SGRT system that can achieve an accuracy that meets international commissioning guidelines. Its open-source and modular design allows for the development and easy translation of novel surface tracking techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark Gardner
- The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | | | - Julia Johnson
- The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Essers M, Mesch L, Beugeling M, Dekker J, de Kruijf W. Setup and intra-fractional motion measurements using surface scanning in head and neck cancer radiotherapy- A feasibility study. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100563. [PMID: 38444887 PMCID: PMC10912619 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is applied to improve patient set-up and to monitor intra-fraction motion. Head and neck cancer (H&N) patients are usually fixated using 5-point thermoplastic masks, that are experienced as uncomfortable or even stressful. Therefore, the feasibility of irradiating H&N patients without a mask by using SGRT was examined. Material and methods Nineteen H&N patients were included in a simulation study. Once a week, before the standard treatment, a maskless treatment was simulated, using SGRT for setup and intrafraction motion monitoring. Initial patient setup accuracy and intrafraction motion was determined using ConeBeam CT (CBCT) images as well as SGRT before and after the (simulated) treatment. The clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin for intrafraction motion was calculated. Using patient questionnaires, the patient-friendliness H&N irradiation with and without mask was determined. Results Maskless setup with SGRT and CBCT was as accurate as with a mask. SGRT showed that intrafraction motion was gradual during the treatment. The CTV-PTV margin correcting for intrafraction motion was 1.7 mm for maskless treatment without interventions, and 1.2 mm if corrected for motions > 2 mm. For 19 % of fractions, the intrafraction motion, as detected by both SGRT and CBCT, was larger than 2 mm in at least one direction. Sixteen patients preferred maskless treatment, while 3 worried they would move too much. Conclusions Using SGRT and a standard head rest resulted in a patient-friendly treatment with accurate patient setup and acceptably small intrafraction motion for H&N patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Essers
- Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart Mesch
- Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike Beugeling
- Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Janita Dekker
- Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Willy de Kruijf
- Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldsworthy S, Latour JM, Palmer S, McNair HA, Cramp M. A thematic exploration of patient and radiation therapist solutions to improve comfort during radiotherapy: A qualitative study. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2023; 54:603-610. [PMID: 37479627 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing radiotherapy are positioned to restrict motion, ensuring treatment accuracy. Immobilisation can be uncomfortable which may impact treatment accuracy. Therapeutic radiographers (TR) are responsible for managing patient comfort, yet there is little evidence to guide practice. The objective was to explore patient and RT experience of comfort management during radiotherapy and identify solutions for how comfort may be managed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five adult patients were purposefully recruited from Somerset NHS FT (SFT NHS) from those referred for, receiving or who had received radiotherapy within 3 months. Further criteria were that treatment delivery time on the couch exceeded 10 min (the time the patient was immobilised on the radiotherapy couch). 25 practicing TRs were recruited across the United Kingdom (UK) with experience of treatment delivery times exceeding 10 min. Semi structured interviews were conducted by the researcher at SFT NHS or in patients own homes and via telephone for TRs. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed by SG and after familiarisation with data, generation of codes, the themes defined were reviewed by researchers and patient partners. FINDINGS For patients, the three themes were: Supported Coping, Modification to Position or Immobilisation and Information Communication and Preparation. For TRs three main themes emerged: Supported Coping, Supporting and Adjusting Patients to Maintain Position and Preparational Approaches. CONCLUSION This qualitative paper provided a shared voice of how comfort can be best managed from the perspective of patients and TRs. Patient and TR views of how comfort is best managed has provided solutions that may be used during radiotherapy. The study has highlighted some of the positive and negative experiences of comfort solutions based on current UK practice. This information will be used to develop recommendations in a radiotherapy comfort intervention package.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Goldsworthy
- Beacon Radiotherapy, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, United Kingdom; Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
| | - Jos M Latour
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Shea Palmer
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, NSW, United Kingdom
| | - Helen A McNair
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Cramp
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Forbes E, Baker AL, Britton B, Clover K, Skelton E, Moore L, Handley T, Oultram S, Oldmeadow C, Gibberd A, McCarter K. A systematic review of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce procedural anxiety among patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20396-20422. [PMID: 37803922 PMCID: PMC10652309 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Procedural anxiety is a concern for a number of patients undergoing radiation therapy. While procedural anxiety is often treated pharmacologically, there is a clinical need for effective alternative strategies for patients who are contraindicated from medication use, and those who prefer not to take unnecessary medications. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions delivered to adults with cancer, in the radiation oncology department, just prior to, or during radiation therapy, in reducing levels of self-reported procedural anxiety. The secondary objectives were to assess the efficacy of these interventions in reducing physiological symptoms of procedural anxiety and anxiety-related treatment disruptions. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from inception up until February 2022. INCLUSION CRITERIA Population: Adult patients with cancer undergoing external beam radiation therapy. INTERVENTION Nonpharmacological interventions delivered within the radiation therapy department. Comparison: standard care controls, or standard care plus an alternative intervention. OUTCOMES level of self-reported procedural anxiety (primary), physiological symptoms of anxiety (secondary) and measures of anxiety-related treatment disruptions (secondary). DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently extracted data. A meta-analysis was originally planned but deemed not feasible as the studies could not be confidently pooled for meta-analysis, due to the variability in the interventions, study designs and the generally low number of studies. Therefore, a narrative synthesis is presented. RESULTS Screening of 2363 records identified nine studies that met inclusion criteria: six studies of music interventions, two of video-based patient education and one of aromatherapy. Overall, three studies received a global rating of strong methodological quality and low risk of bias. Three studies reported a significant effect of the intervention on reducing the primary outcome of self-reported procedural anxiety: two music interventions (both strong methodological quality), and one video-based patient education (moderate methodological quality). One of the studies (a music intervention) also reported a significant reduction in the secondary outcome of physiological symptoms of procedural anxiety (systolic blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS The evidence for nonpharmacological interventions delivered to adults with cancer just prior to, or during radiation therapy, in reducing levels of self-reported procedural anxiety is limited, with very few well-designed studies. There is a need for interventions for procedural anxiety during radiation therapy to be evaluated through rigorous randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Forbes
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
| | - Amanda L. Baker
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
| | - Ben Britton
- Hunter New England Mental Health ServicesNewcastleAustralia
| | - Kerrie Clover
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
- Psycho‐Oncology Service, Department of Consultation Liaison PsychiatryCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahAustralia
| | - Eliza Skelton
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
| | - Lyndell Moore
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia
| | - Tonelle Handley
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
| | - Sharon Oultram
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahAustralia
| | | | - Alison Gibberd
- Data Sciences, Hunter Medical Research InstituteNew LambtonAustralia
| | - Kristen McCarter
- School of Psychological Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and EnvironmentUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dhillon HM, Halkett GKB. Mask-related anxiety and distress during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. J Med Radiat Sci 2023; 70:215-217. [PMID: 37328435 PMCID: PMC10500115 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Some patients experience mask-related anxiety and distress when undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Building on the paper by Forbes et al (doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.658) this editorial discusses techniques to implement to improve the patient experience through education and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haryana M. Dhillon
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho‐Oncology Cooperative Research GroupUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence‐Based Decision‐MakingSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Georgia K. B. Halkett
- Curtin School of Nursing/Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute (CHIRI), Faculty of Health SciencesCurtin UniversityBentleyWestern AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jablonska PA, Parent A, La Macchia N, Chan HH, Filleti M, Ramotar M, Cho YB, Braganza M, Badzynski A, Laperriere N, Conrad T, Tsang DS, Shultz D, Santiago A, Irish JC, Millar BA, Tadic T, Berlin A. A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 42:100663. [PMID: 37587925 PMCID: PMC10425893 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Brain radiotherapy (cnsRT) requires reproducible positioning and immobilization, attained through redundant dedicated imaging studies and a bespoke moulding session to create a thermoplastic mask (T-mask). Innovative approaches may improve the value of care. We prospectively deployed and assessed the performance of a patient-specific 3D-printed mask (3Dp-mask), generated solely from MR imaging, to replicate a reproducible positioning and tolerable immobilization for patients undergoing cnsRT. Material and methods Patients undergoing LINAC-based cnsRT (primary tumors or resected metastases) were enrolled into two arms: control (T-mask) and investigational (3Dp-mask). For the latter, an in-house designed 3Dp-mask was generated from MR images to recreate the head positioning during MR acquisition and allow coupling with the LINAC tabletop. Differences in inter-fraction motion were compared between both arms. Tolerability was assessed using patient-reported questionnaires at various time points. Results Between January 2020 - July 2022, forty patients were enrolled (20 per arm). All participants completed the prescribed cnsRT and study evaluations. Average 3Dp-mask design and printing completion time was 36 h:50 min (range 12 h:56 min - 42 h:01 min). Inter-fraction motion analyses showed three-axis displacements comparable to the acceptable tolerance for the current standard-of-care. No differences in patient-reported tolerability were seen at baseline. During the last week of cnsRT, 3Dp-mask resulted in significantly lower facial and cervical discomfort and patients subjectively reported less pressure and confinement sensation when compared to the T-mask. No adverse events were observed. Conclusion The proposed total inverse planning paradigm using a 3D-printed immobilization device is feasible and renders comparable inter-fraction performance while offering a better patient experience, potentially improving cnsRT workflows and its cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Anna Jablonska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Amy Parent
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Nancy La Macchia
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Harley H.L. Chan
- Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Matthew Filleti
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Matthew Ramotar
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Young-Bin Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Maria Braganza
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Adam Badzynski
- Cancer Digital Intelligence Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Tatiana Conrad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Derek S. Tsang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - David Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Anna Santiago
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Jonathan C. Irish
- Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Barbara-Ann Millar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Tony Tadic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
- Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1P5, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
- Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
- Cancer Digital Intelligence Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Forbes E, Clover K, Baker AL, Britton B, Carlson M, McCarter K. 'Having the mask on didn't worry me until … they clamped my head down so I wouldn't move': A qualitative study exploring anxiety in patients with head and neck cancer during radiation therapy. J Med Radiat Sci 2023; 70:283-291. [PMID: 36724485 PMCID: PMC10500108 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than 20% of patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer report anxiety specifically related to the immobilisation mask, a tight-fighting mask patients are required to wear for the duration of each treatment session. However, limited research has investigated this from the patient perspective. The aim of this study was to better understand patient experiences of mask anxiety during head and neck cancer radiation therapy and to explore patient attitudes toward potential strategies that may reduce mask anxiety during this treatment. METHODS Five patients with head and neck cancer, who had self-reported mask anxiety during radiation therapy, participated in semi-structured, qualitative interviews exploring their experiences of anxiety and suggestions for reducing anxiety. A codebook thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Six main themes were identified: (1) triggers of anxiety; (2) adjusting to radiation therapy; (3) education about the mask; (4) coping; (5) motivation and (6) improving the patient experience. CONCLUSION Findings from these interviews provide valuable insight into how and when healthcare providers may be able to assist patients to manage mask anxiety. Recommendations include increased communication from health care providers; delivery of visual information to improve patient preparedness; exposure/opportunities to interact with the masks prior to treatment commencing and increased control of music/soundtrack selection. However, a limitation of this study is the small sample size and further research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Forbes
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kerrie Clover
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- PsychoOncology Service, Department of Consultation Liaison PsychiatryCalvary Mater NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Amanda L. Baker
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ben Britton
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
- Hunter New England Mental Health ServicesNewcastleNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Melissa Carlson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health Medicine and WellbeingUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kristen McCarter
- School of Psychological Sciences, College of Science, Engineering and EnvironmentUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goldsworthy S, Latour JM, Palmer S, McNair H, Cramp M. Identifying core components of a radiotherapy comfort intervention package using nominal group technique. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29:926-934. [PMID: 37499585 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A comfortable treatment position in radiotherapy may promote patient stability and improve outcomes such as accuracy. The aim of this study was to identify, prioritise and determine the feasibility of delivery of intervention components as part of a radiotherapy comfort intervention package. METHODS Prior research, consisting of a systematic review and qualitative interviews with patient and therapeutic radiographers, was triangulated and 15 intervention components developed. An online nominal group technique consensus meeting with 7 patients who received radiotherapy exceeding 10 min for one of three anatomical cancer sites and 3 therapeutic radiographers (TRs) participated. Four activities were undertaken: 1) discussion of comfort intervention components; 2) initial vote; 3) prioritisation of intervention components; and 4) discussion of feasibility in radiotherapy and were analysed using established quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS One intervention component was added from initial discussions to the 15 pre-determined components being discussed. 11 components were recommended as 'accepted' (n = 5) or 'accepted with caution' (n = 6) to proceed to development. The highest scoring intervention components were 'Compassionate & empathetic communication training for TRs' and 'Tailored information, e.g., TRs provide the required information only as part of preparation for treatment'. Anther that followed closely was 'Adjustments & supports provided for arms or legs during treatment by TRs'. Those 'accepted with caution' included 'Soft pads/mattress under the body to alleviate body discomfort managed by TRs'. Qualitative analysis highlighted concerns over the radiation environment and emphasised the importance of resources such as equipment, training, and time. CONCLUSION The recommended comfort interventions have potential to improve patient comfort during radiotherapy and should be considered to incorporate into positioning and immobilisation guidelines. However, specific intervention strategies to address these components will need to be developed and robustly evaluated. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Comfort interventions might help patients relax and stay still during treatment, which could improve treatment accuracy and efficacy. Introducing these comfort interventions in practice have potential to lead to a more positive patient experience and improved overall quality of care during radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Goldsworthy
- Beacon Radiotherapy, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, United Kingdom; Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
| | - J M Latour
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - S Palmer
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - H McNair
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - M Cramp
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flood T, O Neill A, Oliveira CM, Barbosa B, Soares AL, Muscat K, Guille S, McClure P, Hughes C, McFadden S. Patients' perspectives of the skills and competencies of therapy radiographers/radiation therapists (TRs/RTTs) in the UK, Portugal and Malta; a qualitative study from the SAFE Europe project. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29 Suppl 1:S117-S127. [PMID: 36959043 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of the Therapy Radiographer/Radiation Therapist (TR/RTT) is to provide radiotherapy to patients with a cancer diagnosis. This includes, not only administration of treatment, but also management of side-effects and provision of support/care. Despite this role being consistent throughout Europe, there is currently no standardisation of education for TRs/RTTs. The SAFE EUROPE project aims to standardize TR/RTT education to enable 'safe and free exchange' of TRs/RTTs across Europe. Consequently, this study aims to explore patients' perspectives regarding the current skills and competencies of TRs/RTTs. METHODS From May 2021 to February 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who had recently received radiotherapy in the UK, Malta and Portugal. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the NHS Research Ethics Committee with additional local approvals obtained. RESULTS Forty-eight participants from the UK (n = 18), Portugal (n = 19), and Malta (n = 11) completed interviews. Participants described high satisfaction with TRs'/RTTs' competence and skills in all three countries. The main theme arising from the analysis was the importance of trust building with TRs/RTTs. Six factors were identified as influencing levels of trust: communication; side-effect management; team consistency; relational skills; patient dignity; and competence. A small number of patients reported feeling rushed and not having their physical and emotional needs met by TRs/RTTs. CONCLUSION This multicentre study demonstrated that patients perceive TRs/RTTs in the UK, Malta and Portugal as highly competent and skilled. Practical recommendations are provided to address identified deficits in practice, which can be addressed through adaptation of TR/RTT education/training and clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Recommendations arising from this study are important to ensure that TRs/RTTs have transferable skills that provide consistently high quality care to patients throughout Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Flood
- Lecturer in Radiotherapy and Oncology, Ulster University Northern Ireland, UK.
| | - A O Neill
- Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
| | - C M Oliveira
- Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia Do Porto (IPO Porto), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
| | - B Barbosa
- Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia Do Porto (IPO Porto), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
| | - A L Soares
- Medical Physics Service,Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - K Muscat
- University of Malta, MSD 2080, Malta.
| | - S Guille
- Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
| | - P McClure
- Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
| | - C Hughes
- School of Nursing and School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
| | - S McFadden
- Senior Lecturer, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carmack CL, Agosta MT, Ann-Yi S, Bruera E. Treating Radiation Anxiety with Systematic Desensitization: Head and Neck Cancer Case Reports. J Palliat Med 2023. [PMID: 36730789 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Head and neck cancer patients have high rates of psychological distress, which may be exacerbated by the treatments they receive. Many patients who undergo radiation therapy report significant anxiety associated with the thermoplastic mask required for immobilization during treatment. Case Description: This report presents two examples of head and neck cancer patients reporting high mask anxiety, along with a history of claustrophobia, who expressed concern about their abilities to initiate and adhere to treatment. Both were referred to supportive care psychology before radiation treatment initiation. With counseling and the use of systematic desensitization, they were successfully able to complete their treatments. Discussion: Results of these case reports highlight the value of integrating early supportive care in the treatment of head and neck cancer and support the need for further study in future randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy L Carmack
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Monica T Agosta
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sujin Ann-Yi
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guo W, Wang B, Zhang LY, Sun YC, Xue T. Study on the application of 3D printing head film fixation technology in cranial radiotherapy. J Cancer 2023; 14:981-988. [PMID: 37151399 PMCID: PMC10158522 DOI: 10.7150/jca.82909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the use of 3D printing technology to customize individualized precise radiotherapy head masks for cranial radiotherapy patients. Through the comparison with thermoplastic head film, evaluate the effect of this material on deep dose attenuation and body surface dose, and evaluate its positioning accuracy and repeatability for clinical application. Methods: Thirty patients with head and neck radiotherapy were divided into the control group and the experimental group. The control group used the traditional thermoplastic head film fixation technique for body position fixation, and the experimental group used the 3D printing head film fixation technique. The patient setup was verified by kV-CBCT scanning to obtain the translational setup error and rotational setup error in the X, Y, and Z directions. Results: At a depth of 5 cm, both materials have a radiation attenuation rate of <1%. At the surface location, the body surface dose of control group increased by approximately 27%. With a 3D printing head film, the body surface dose increased by approximately 18%. The positioning of two groups of patients was verified by the kV-CBCT, and a total of 232 data sets were obtained. The average translation positioning errors in the X, Y, and Z direction of control group and experimental group were 1.29 mm, 1.42 mm, 1.38 mm and 1.16 mm, 1.24 mm, 1.16 mm, respectively. The average rotation positioning error in the X, Y, and Z direction of control group and experimental group were 1.29°, 1.02°, 1.01° and 1.08°, 0.96°, 1.00°, respectively. The translational setup errors in the Y and Z directions and rotational setup errors in the X direction significantly differed between the control and experimental groups (all p<0.05), but no statistical significance was found in the other directions (all p>0. 05). Conclusion: Compared to the traditional thermoplastic head membranes, 3D printing head membranes has shown a reliable and reproducible interactional positioning accuracy. Of course, further investigations are needed before the new technology can be used on a regular basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei, 061000, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei, 061000, China
| | - Li-Yuan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Department of Endocrinology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yun-Chuan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei, 061000, China
| | - Tao Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei, 061000, China
- ✉ Corresponding authors: Li-Yuan Zhang, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Department of Endocrinology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. . Yun-Chuan Sun, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei, 061000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Forbes E, Clover K, Baker AL, McCarter KL, Oultram S, Kumar M, Wratten C, Tieu MT, Nixon J, Britton B. Biofeedback Enabled CALM (BeCALM)-the feasibility of biofeedback on procedural anxiety during radiation therapy: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062467. [PMID: 36600369 PMCID: PMC9730381 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients undergoing treatment for cancer who require radiation therapy (RT) report anxiety specifically relating to the RT procedure. Procedural anxiety can be detrimental to treatment delivery, causing disruptions to treatment sessions, or treatment avoidance. Acute procedural anxiety is most commonly managed with anxiolytic medication. There is a need for effective, non-pharmacological interventions for patients not suitable for, or who prefer to avoid, anxiolytic medication. The primary objectives of this pilot trial are to evaluate the: (1) feasibility of conducting the Biofeedback Enabled CALM (BeCALM) intervention during RT treatment sessions; (2) acceptability of the BeCALM intervention among patients; and (3) acceptability of the BeCALM intervention among radiation therapists. The secondary objective of this pilot trial is to examine the potential effectiveness of the BeCALM intervention delivered by radiation therapists to reduce procedural anxiety during RT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a pilot randomised controlled trial. A researcher will recruit adult patients with cancer (3-month recruitment period) scheduled to undergo RT and meeting eligibility criteria for procedural anxiety at the Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle (NSW), Australia. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive treatment as usual or the BeCALM intervention (biofeedback plus brief breathing techniques). The primary outcomes are feasibility (measured by recruitment, retention rates and percentage of treatment sessions in which the intervention was successfully delivered); radiation therapists perceived feasibility and acceptability (survey responses); and patient perceived acceptability (survey responses). Secondary outcome is potential effectiveness of the intervention (as measured by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-State subscale; the Distress Thermometer; and an analysis of treatment duration). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol has received approval from Hunter New England Health Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/ETH11356). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, as well as presentation at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12621001742864.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Forbes
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerrie Clover
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- PsychoOncology Service, Department of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda L Baker
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristen Louise McCarter
- School of Psychological Sciences, College of Science, Engineering and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sharon Oultram
- Radiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mahesh Kumar
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Radiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Wratten
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Radiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Minh Thi Tieu
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Radiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jodie Nixon
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Occupational Therapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ben Britton
- Mental Health Services, Hunter New England Health, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lima KLDF, Magalhães IA, Arruda LMD, Dantas TS, Silva PGDB. A simple and low-cost technic for immobilization of mandible during head and heck radiotherapy: a technical note. Int J Radiat Biol 2022; 99:875-878. [PMID: 36374113 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2146229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Immobilization protocols for head and neck radiotherapy (HNR) are needed to reduce radiation dispersion in non-tumoral tissues and to reduce damage to noble structures; however, involuntary mandibular movements require additional adaptations of thermoplastic masks. PURPOSE Our objective was to describe an easy and low-cost disposition to help thermoplastic masks immobilize the mandible during HNR. MATERIALS AND METHODS We created Styrofoam models to stabilize the mandible which was used to make adaptation to the thermoplastic masks. The Styrofoam model was inserted into alginate to construct a mold and a self-curing acrylic resin was added into the mold. After the acrylic resin hardened, the dispositive mandibular immobilizer was removed from the alginate mold and adjusted with Maxicut and Minicut or other drills and sandpaper. The alginate mold can be used on the same day to create backup devices. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Our device was made in a simple way, has a low cost, and helps the thermoplastic masks to immobilize the mandible, leading to a more precise individualization of head and neck immobilization that can reduce unanticipated radiation scatter and improve radiation distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karisa Lorena de Freitas Lima
- Department of Dentistry, Unichristus, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
- Hospital da Liga Mossoroense de Estudos e Combate ao Câncer, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva
- Department of Dentistry, Unichristus, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
- Hospital Haroldo Juaçaba, Ceará Cancer Institute, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Robar JL, Kammerzell B, Hulick K, Kaiser P, Young C, Verzwyvelt V, Cheng X, Shepherd M, Orbovic R, Fedullo S, Majcher C, DiMarco S, Stasiak J. Novel multi jet fusion 3D-printed patient immobilization for radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13773. [PMID: 36052990 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Thermoplastic immobilizers are used routinely in radiation therapy to achieve positioning accuracy. These devices are variable in quality as they are dependent on the skill of the human fabricator. We examine the potential multi jet fusion (MJF) 3D printing for the production immobilizers with a focus on the surface dosimetry of several MJF-printed PA12-based material candidates. Materials are compared with the goal of minimizing surface dose with comparison to standard thermoplastic. We introduce a novel metamaterial design for the shell of the immobilizer, with the aims of mechanical robustness and low-dose buildup. We demonstrate first examples of adult and pediatric cranial and head-and-neck immobilizers. METHODS Three different PA12 materials were examined and compared to fused deposition modeling-printed polylactic acid (PLA), PLA with density lowered by adding hollow glass microspheres, and to perforated or perforated/stretched and solid status quo thermoplastic samples. Build-up dose measurements were made using a parallel plate chamber. A metamaterial design was established based on a packed hexagonal geometry. Radiochromic film dosimetry was performed to determine the dependence of surface dose on the metamaterial design. Full cranial and head-and-neck prototype immobilizers were designed, printed, and assessed with regard to dimensional accuracy. RESULTS Build-up dose measurements demonstrated the superiority of the PA12 material with a light fusing agent, which yielded a ∼15% dose reduction compared to other MJF materials. Metamaterial samples provided dose reductions ranging from 11% to 40% compared to stretched thermoplastic. MJF-printed immobilizers were produced reliably, demonstrated the versatility of digital design, and showed dimensional accuracy with 97% of sampled points within ±2 mm. CONCLUSIONS MJF is a promising technology for an automated fabrication of patient immobilizers. Material selection and metamaterial design can be leveraged to yield surface dose reduction of up to 40%. Immobilizer design is highly customizable, and the first examples of MJF-printed immobilizers demonstrate excellent dimensional accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Robar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.,Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.,Adaptiiv Medical Technologies, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Kevin Hulick
- HP, Vancouver, Washington, USA.,HP, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Pierre Kaiser
- HP, Vancouver, Washington, USA.,HP, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Calvin Young
- HP, Vancouver, Washington, USA.,HP, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Xin Cheng
- HP, Vancouver, Washington, USA.,HP, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Sara Fedullo
- Adaptiiv Medical Technologies, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Comparing patient acceptability of MR-guided radiotherapy to conventional CBCT on two Elekta systems: a questionnaire-based survey. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396922000206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and Purpose:
The magnetic resonance linear accelerator system (MR Linac) is a novel piece of radiotherapy (RT) equipment allowing the routine application of daily MR-guided treatment adaptation. The hardware design required for such technical capabilities and the increased complexity of the treatment workflow entails a notable departure from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based RT. Patient tolerability of treatment is paramount to RT practice where high compliance is required. Presented is a comparative analysis of how such modality specific characteristics may ultimately impact the patient experience of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Forty patients undergoing RT for prostate cancer (PCa) on either the MR Linac (n = 20) or a CBCT-based linac (n = 20) were provided with a validated patient reported outcomes measures (PROM’s) questionnaire at fraction 1 and fraction 20. The 18-item questionnaire provided patient responses recorded using a 4-point Likert scale, 0 denoting a response of ‘Not at all’, 1 ‘Slightly’, 2 ‘Moderately’ and 3 signifying ‘Very’. The analysis provided insight into both comparisons between modalities at singular time points (fractions 1 and 20), as well as a temporal analysis within a single modality, denoting changing patient experience.
Results:
Patients generally found the MR Linac treatment couch more comfortable, however, found the increase in treatment duration harder to tolerate. Responses for all items remained stable between first and last fraction across both cohorts, indicating minimal temporal variation within a single modality. None of the responses were statistically significant at the 0·01 level.
Conclusion:
Whether radiotherapy for PCa is delivered on a CBCT linac or the MR Linac, there is little difference in patient experience with minimal experiential variation within a single modality.
Collapse
|
19
|
Reitz D, Muecke J, da Silva Mendes V, Landry G, Reiner M, Niyazi M, Belka C, Freislederer P, Corradini S. Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:134-139. [PMID: 35958289 PMCID: PMC9361321 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imaging. The aim of the present work was to compare the magnitudes of intrafractional deviation for different mask systems. Material and methods Four different head mask systems (open face mask, open mask, stereotactic mask, double mask) used in the treatment of 40 patients were investigated. In total 487 treatment fractions and 3708 X-ray images were collected. Deviations were calculated by comparison of the acquired X-ray images with digitally reconstructed radiographs. The results of intrafractional X-ray deviations for translational and rotational axes were compared between the different mask systems. Results Deviations were below 0.6 mm for translations and below 0.6° for rotations for all mask systems. Along the lateral and longitudinal directions the stereotactic mask was superior, while along the vertical direction the double mask showed the lowest deviations. For low rotational deviations the double mask is the best amongst all other mask systems. Conclusion As expected, the lowest movement was shown using cranial stereotactic mask systems. The results have shown deviations lower than 0.6 mm and 0.6° using any of the four thermoplastic mask systems.
Collapse
|
20
|
Burns M, Campbell R, French S, Dhillon HM, Butow PN, Pritchard A, Sundaresan P. Trajectory of anxiety related to radiation therapy mask immobilization and treatment delivery in head and neck cancer and radiation therapists’ ability to detect this anxiety. “Anxiety during radiation therapy with mask”. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100967. [PMID: 36148368 PMCID: PMC9486416 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Receiving radiation therapy treatment with an immobilization mask is a source of anxiety in people with head and neck cancer (HNC). This study aimed to document the trajectory of situational anxiety during HNC treatment delivery and explore radiation therapists’ (RTs’) ability to identify it. Methods and Materials Participants with HNC commencing radiation therapy completed the state-trait anxiety inventory at their mask-making session, and once each week immediately before and after their radiation treatment. Treating RTs independently rated their perception of participant's anxiety at the same time points. Participant- and RT-rated anxiety scores were calculated at each time point together with the proportion of participants reporting clinically significant anxiety (state-trait anxiety inventory ≥ 40). Intraclass correlations were calculated to assess concordance between participant- and RT-ratings. Results Sixty-five participants and 16 RTs took part in this study. Participants were classified into 1 of 5 trajectory groups: stable high (16%), increasing (19%), decreasing (27%), fluctuating (19%), and no anxiety (19%). Nearly half (43%) of participants reported clinically significant anxiety before their mask-making session, and between 30% and 43% across trajectories reported significant anxiety immediately before treatments. Intraclass correlation values indicated poor agreement between participant- and RT-ratings. Conclusions Situational anxiety is prevalent in people receiving HNC radiation therapy with mask immobilization. RTs did not reliably capture patients’ situational anxiety. There is no single best time point to provide intervention, suggesting people should be screened for anxiety regularly throughout their treatment. Resources and education should also be available to improve RT skills in providing psychosocial support.
Collapse
|
21
|
Patel GP, McAdoo B, Eaton B, Romej M, Stack K, Wolf F. Decreased Cerebral Perfusion Under Anesthesia During Radiation Treatment: A Case Report. A A Pract 2022; 16:e01580. [DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
22
|
Adeberg S, Sauer C, Lambert L, Regnery S, Windisch P, Zaoui K, Freudlsperger C, Moratin J, Farnia B, Nikendei C, Krauss J, Ehrenthal JC, El Shafie R, Hörner-Rieber J, König L, Akbaba S, Lang K, Held T, Rieken S, Debus J, Friederich HC, Maatouk I. Screening and Psycho-Oncological Support for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer and Brain Malignancies Before Radiotherapy With Mask Fixation: Results of a Feasibility Study. Front Psychol 2021; 12:760024. [PMID: 34975651 PMCID: PMC8716729 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This single-center, single-arm trial investigates the feasibility of a psycho-oncological care program, which aims to reduce psychological distress and improve compliance with radiotherapy with mask fixation in patients with head and neck cancer or brain malignancies. The care program comprised (1) a screening/needs assessment and (2) the provision of a psycho-oncological intervention using imaginative stabilization techniques for distressed patients (distress due to anxiety ≥5) or in a case of subjective interest in the psycho-oncological intervention. Another allocation path to the intervention was directly through the radiation oncologist in charge who classified the patient as: in need of support to tolerate the immobilization device. Of a total of 1,020 screened patients, 257 (25.2%) patients indicated a distress ≥5 and 141 (13.8%) patients reported panic attacks. 25% of the patients reported a subjective interest in psycho-oncological support. A total of 35 patients received the psycho-oncological intervention, of which 74% were assigned by radiation oncologists. In this small patient cohort, no significant pre-post effects in terms of depression, anxiety, distress, and quality of life (mental and physical component scores) could be detected. Our results indicate a good feasibility (interdisciplinary workflow and cooperation, allocation by physicians in charge) of the psycho-oncological care program for this cohort of patients before radiotherapy with mask fixation. The screening results underline the high psychological distress and demand for psycho-oncological support. However, since the utilization of our intervention was low, future studies should reduce the barriers and improve compliance to psycho-oncological services by these patients.Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do #DRKS00013493
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Adeberg
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Sauer
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Lambert
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Karim Zaoui
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julius Moratin
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Farnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Christoph Nikendei
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Krauss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Rami El Shafie
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Goettingen University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Christoph Friederich
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Imad Maatouk
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section of Psychosomatic Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Imad Maatouk,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Individual 3D-printed fixation masks for radiotherapy: first clinical experiences. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 16:1043-1049. [PMID: 34021859 PMCID: PMC8166668 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02393-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To show the feasibility of 3D-printed fixation masks for whole brain radiation therapy in a clinical setting and perform a first comparison to an established thermoplastic mask system. Methods Six patients were irradiated with whole brain radiotherapy using individually 3D-printed masks. Daily image guidance and position correction were performed prior to each irradiation fraction. The vectors of the daily position correction were compared to two collectives of patients, who were irradiated using the standard thermoplastic mask system (one cohort with head masks; one cohort with head and neck masks). Results The mean systematic errors in the experimental cohort ranged between 0.59 and 2.10 mm which is in a comparable range to the control groups (0.18 mm–0.68 mm and 0.34 mm–2.96 mm, respectively). The 3D-printed masks seem to be an alternative to the established thermoplastic mask systems. Nevertheless, further investigation will need to be performed. Conclusion The prevailing study showed a reliable and reproducible interfractional positioning accuracy using individually 3D-printed masks for whole brain irradiation in a clinical routine. Further investigations, especially concerning smaller target volumes or other areas of the body, need to be performed before using the system on a larger basis.
Collapse
|
24
|
Effeney LC, Nixon JL, Pigott AE. Occupational therapy for people with mask anxiety undergoing radiotherapy. Aust Occup Ther J 2021; 68:374-383. [PMID: 33966280 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Up to one third of people with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy experience mask anxiety. However, there is limited literature guiding the role of health professionals, including occupational therapists, in managing mask anxiety. This study aimed to explore the content of occupational therapy interactions with people who have identified mask anxiety. METHODS A cohort of 20 participants with identified mask anxiety engaged in semi-structured interviews with occupational therapists. Theoretical thematic analysis and the framework provided by the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) were employed to explore the content of occupational therapy interactions with people experiencing mask anxiety. RESULTS Theoretical thematic analysis identified 13 relevant themes with 49 codes relating to the interaction between participants and occupational therapists. Analysis of these interactions identified the occupational therapy role to be holistic and multifaceted. The cognitive, affective, and institutional components of the CMOP-E were dominantly explored by the occupational therapists with participants. Occupation, spirituality, and the cultural environment were either not addressed or minimally discussed with participants. CONCLUSION The management of mask anxiety during radiation therapy is a novel area of practice for occupational therapists. The results of this study suggest that the occupational therapy profession explores a range of factors with the person undergoing radiation therapy with mask anxiety, and that the CMOP-E model can be used to guide these interactions. Future research is required to further define this role and its efficacy in managing mask anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Effeney
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jodie L Nixon
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Occupational Therapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amanda E Pigott
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Occupational Therapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grilo AM, Santos B, Baptista I, Monsanto F. Exploring the cancer patients' experiences during external radiotherapy: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 52:101965. [PMID: 34023669 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the subjective experience of adult cancer patients undergoing external radiotherapy and provide evidence for better practices in radiotherapy services. METHODS A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA Statement Guidelines. Qualitative and mixed studies were identified through five electronic databases (CINAHL, PsychINFO, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science), between March and April 2020, using defined criteria. Methodological quality assessment was conducted, and the data integrated into a thematic synthesis. RESULTS Of the 886 studies identified, 13 met our inclusion criteria. Patients experiences were described into four main themes: (1) Time, (2) Physical Environment, (3) Treatment Concerns and (4) Radiotherapy Team. Time refers to waiting time and treatment time; Physical Environment states temperature in the treatment room and equipment; Treatment Concerns included side effects, daily activities, positioning and immobilization and treatment preparation (e.g., bladder filling); radiotherapy team comprised patients support; response to patients needs and recognized team. The generating analytical phase of thematic analysis allowed us to recognize that the effectiveness of the radiotherapy team operates as a facilitator of the patients' experience. In contrast, time in the waiting room, the treatment preparation when is required, and the positioning and immobilization, specifically for the neck and head patients, act as barriers. CONCLUSION Four distinct themes were identified to be positively and negatively associated with patients' experience during external radiotherapy. The evidence provides valuable recommendations to improved radiotherapy services organization, as well as to the delivery of more patient-centred care adjusted to the concerns and needs of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Monteiro Grilo
- H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL- Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Portugal; CICPsi - Research Center for Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Bárbara Santos
- Medical Imaging and RT Degree, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Inês Baptista
- Medical Imaging and RT Degree, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Fátima Monsanto
- H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL- Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nardone V, Reginelli A, Vinciguerra C, Correale P, Calvanese MG, Falivene S, Sangiovanni A, Grassi R, Di Biase A, Polifrone MA, Caraglia M, Cappabianca S, Guida C. Mood Disorder in Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy During the COVID-19 Outbreak. Front Psychol 2021; 12:568839. [PMID: 33815186 PMCID: PMC8017226 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.568839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is having a devastating psychological impact on patients, especially patients with cancer. This work aims to evaluate mood disorders of cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy during COVID-19 in comparison with cancer patients who underwent radiation therapy in 2019. Materials and Methods: We included all the patients undergoing radiation therapy at our department in two-time points (once a week for a month in May 2019) and during the COVID-19 outbreak (in April 2020). All the patients were asked to fulfill a validated questionnaire (STAI-Y1, State trait anxiety inventory scale), the Symptom Distress thermometer (SDT) (from 0 to 10 score), and the Beck Depression Inventory v.2 (BDI-2). We took into account the COVID-19 outbreak and also sex, age, week of radiation treatment, and disease. Results: We included 458 patients (220 males and 238 females), with a median age of 64 years. STAI-Y1 median score was 40 (mean 41,3, range 19-79), whereas the median score of SDT was five and BDI-2 median score was 11. STAI-Y1, SDT, and BDI-2 were significantly correlated with the COVID-19 outbreak (p < 0,001 for all the tests), sex (p: 0,016 for STAI-Y1, p < 0.001 for SDT, p:0.013 for BDI-2), week of treatment (p: 0.012 for STAI-Y1 and p: 0.031 for SDT), and disease (p:0.015 for STAI-Y1, p < 0.001 for SDT and p:0.020 for BDI-2). Conclusions: The prevalence of mood disorders in patients undergoing radiation therapy is higher than expected and even higher during the COVID-19 outbreak. These measurements could be useful as a baseline to start medical humanities programs to decrease these scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Nardone
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | | | - Pierpaolo Correale
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Grand Metropolitan Hospital "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli," Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | | | - Sara Falivene
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Di Biase
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Polifrone
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Grand Metropolitan Hospital "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli," Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Michele Caraglia
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | - Cesare Guida
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Natale JL. Reducing Pediatric Patient Anxiety: Implementing a Nonpharmacologic Intervention to Aid Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 25:215-218. [PMID: 33739347 DOI: 10.1188/21.cjon.215-218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacologic interventions are often used to assist with immobilization and decrease anxiety in pediatric patients undergoing radiation therapy. For these patients, distraction can be an alternative to using pharmacologic measures to address anxiety. As a distraction technique, this pilot project placed pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years in a remote-controlled ride-on car (RC-ROC) to enter and exit the radiation therapy treatment room. Evaluation of the effectiveness of this distraction technique included patient propofol dosing, time sedated, and time in the treatment room, as well as staff satisfaction with the technique.
Collapse
|
28
|
A systematic review of effectiveness of interventions applicable to radiotherapy that are administered to improve patient comfort, increase patient compliance, and reduce patient distress or anxiety. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 26:314-324. [PMID: 32245711 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this review was to search existing literature to identify comfort interventions that can be used to assist an adult patient to undergo complex radiotherapy requiring positional stability for periods greater than 10 min. The objectives of this review were to; 1) identify comfort interventions used for clinical procedures that involve sustained inactivity similar to radiotherapy; 2) define characteristics of comfort interventions for future practice; and 3) determine the effectiveness of identified comfort interventions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses statement and the Template-for-Intervention-Description-and Replication guide were used. KEY FINDINGS The literature search was performed using PICO criteria with five databases (AMED, CINAHL EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) identifying 5269 titles. After screening, 46 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen interventions were reported and were grouped into four categories: Audio-visual, Psychological, Physical, and Other interventions (education/information and aromatherapy). The majority of aromatherapy, one audio-visual and one educational intervention were judged to be clinically significant for improving patient comfort based on anxiety outcome measures (effect size ≥ 0.4, mean change is greater than the Minimal-Important-Difference and low-risk-of-bias). Medium to large effect sizes were reported in many interventions where differences did not exceed the Minimal-Important-Difference for the measure. These interventions were deemed worthy of further investigation. CONCLUSION Several interventions were identified that may improve comfort during radiotherapy assisting patients to sustain and endure the same position over time. This is crucial for the continual growth of complex radiotherapy requiring a need for comfort to ensure stability for targeted treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Further investigation of comfort interventions is warranted, including tailoring interventions to patient choice and determining if multiple interventions can be used concurrently to improve effectiveness.
Collapse
|