Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in anti-HIV positive and negative homosexual men

Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Vaccination in People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

People living with HIV (PLWH) remain at high risk of mortality and morbidity from vaccine-preventable diseases, even though antiretroviral therapy (ART) has restored life expectancy and general well-being. When, which, and how many doses of vaccine should be administered over the lifetime of PLWH are questions that have become clinically relevant. Immune responses to most vaccines are known to be impaired in PLWH. Effective control of viremia with ART and restored CD4+ T-cell count are correlated with an improvement in responsiveness to routine vaccines. However, the presence of immune alterations, comorbidities and co-infections may alter it. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on immune responses to different vaccines in the setting of HIV infection, emphasizing the potential effect of HIV-related factors and presence of comorbidities in modulating such responses. A better understanding of these issues will help guide vaccination and prevention strategies for PLWH.

Alginate-coated chitosan nanoparticles act as effective adjuvant for hepatitis A vaccine in mice

The numerous recent hepatitis A outbreaks emphasize the need for vaccination; despite the effectiveness of the current ones, developments are needed to overcome its high cost plus some immune response limitations. Our study aims to evaluate the use of chitosan and alginate-coated chitosan nanoparticles as an adjuvant/carrier for the hepatitis A vaccine (HAV) against the traditional adjuvant alum. Immune responses towards (HAV-Al) with alum, (HAV-Ch) with chitosan, and (HAV-aCNP) with alginate-coated chitosan nanoparticles, were assessed in mice. HAV-aCNP significantly improved the immunogenicity by increasing the seroconversion rate (100%), the hepatitis A antibodies level, and the splenocytes proliferation. Thus, the HAV-aCNP adjuvant was superior to other classes in IFN-γ and IL-10 development. Meanwhile, the solution formula of HAV with chitosan showed comparable humoral and cellular immune responses to alum-adjuvanted suspension with a balanced Th1/Th2 immune pathway. The current study showed the potential of alginate-coated chitosan nanoparticles as an effective carrier for HAV. Consequently, this would impact the cost of HAV production positively.

Vaccination in the Adult Patient Infected with HIV: A Review of Vaccine Efficacy and Immunogenicity

Patients infected with HIV remain at increased risk of mortality and morbidity from diseases that are preventable with vaccines partly due to the persisting immunopathology that results in impaired responses to vaccination despite virologic suppression. Because data on clinical effectiveness in patients who are immunocompromised remain limited, undervaccination of individuals with HIV poses a major concern. Multiple societies have published recommendations on vaccination in individuals infected with HIV. Many of these recommendations are based on extrapolation of data from clinical trials that usually exclude patients with HIV, although there is a growing body of data from patients infected with HIV as well. In this review, we describe the available literature on vaccine response in the adult patient with HIV as measured by immunogenicity or vaccine efficacy.

Immune response to hepatitis A vaccine in patients with HIV

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of various factors that may influence the immunologic response to hepatitis A mono-vaccine or hepatitis A/B co-vaccine (Twinrix®) in HIV-infected patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

HIV positive patients with a full course of hepatitis A vaccine were tested for HAV antibodies. The seroconversion rates were determined, and the influence of several factors including CD4 cell counts, CD4/CD8 ratio, plasma viral load, type of vaccine, and antiretroviral therapy at the time of vaccine, was evaluated.

RESULTS

After vaccination, 80.2% of the patients developed anti-HAV antibodies, 81.5% in the mono-vaccine group and 79.2% in the hepatitis A/B co-vaccine group. In the mono-vaccine group, factors significantly associated with a better response to the vaccine were higher CD4 cell count, higher CD4/CD8 ratio, and shorter time interval from vaccine to serological control. In patients who received the hepatitis A/B co-vaccine, younger age and female sex were significantly associated with better vaccine response. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed time interval from vaccine to serological control of more than 5 years vs. less than 1 year to be significantly associated with decrease of seroconversion after HAV vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS

The response to hepatitis A vaccine is impaired in HIV positive patients. HIV patients, at least those older than 30, should be tested for seroconversion after receiving the hepatitis A vaccine. As hepatitis A titers may rapidly decline, control serology during follow-up should be proposed, possibly within two years. However, vaccine type does not play a role in vaccine response.

Response to Hepatitis A Vaccination in Immunocompromised Travelers

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A vaccines are highly immunogenic in healthy patients, but there is uncertainty about their immunogenicity in immunocompromised patients.

METHODS

Our study included immunocompromised patients who received 1 or 2 hepatitis A vaccinations between January 2011 and June 2013. We assessed factors that influenced the serologic response to vaccination. We performed a literature review of previous studies on hepatitis A vaccination in immunocompromised patients.

RESULTS

Of 85 immunocompromised patients, 65 used immunosuppressive drugs, 13 had received stem cell transplants, and 7 were infected with human immunodeficiency virus. After vaccination, 65 of 85 (76.5%) developed antibodies. Tumor necrosis factor α blocker use was associated with better serologic responses than other immunosuppressive drugs. Female patients were more compliant than male patients with postvaccination antibody titer measurements. In 11 relevant studies, antibody responses after the first and second vaccination averaged 37% and 82%, respectively. Factors that negatively influenced serologic response rates were high doses of immunosuppressive drugs, fewer hepatitis A vaccinations, and a short interval between vaccination and antibody measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunocompromised patients showed moderate to good serologic responses to hepatitis A vaccination, but may need more time to develop immunity. Tumor necrosis factor α blocker use was associated with better antibody responses than other drugs. Specifically, male patients should be motivated to return for antibody titer measurements.

Sexual transmission of viral hepatitis

Identification and vaccination of adults at risk for hepatitis B virus acquisition through sexual contact is a key strategy to reduce new hepatitis B virus infections among at-risk adults. Hepatitis C has emerged as a sexually transmitted infection among men with male sex partners (MSM). Several biological and behavioral factors have been linked to hepatitis C virus transmission among MSM, including human immunodeficiency virus coinfection; participation in sexual practices that result in mucosal damage or result in exposure to blood; presence of sexually transmitted diseases (STIs), particularly ulcerative STIs; multiple/casual sex partners; and unprotected anal intercourse.

Comparative effectiveness of two doses versus three doses of hepatitis A vaccine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and -uninfected men who have sex with men

The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to compare the serologic response between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) receiving two and three doses of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine and HIV-uninfected MSM receiving two doses of HAV vaccine. Between June 2009 and December 2010, 582 MSM aged 18 to 40 years who were seronegative for HAV were enrolled in the study. HIV-infected MSM received either two doses of HAV vaccine (1,440 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units) (n = 140) with the second dose given at week 24 or three doses (n = 225) with the second and third dose given at weeks 4 and 24, respectively, while HIV-uninfected MSM (n = 217) received two doses. The primary endpoint was seroconversion at week 48. The geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-HAV antibody was determined at weeks 48 and 72. At week 48, the seroconversion rate was 75.7%, 77.8%, and 88.5% in intention-to-treat analysis for two-dose HIV-infected, three-dose HIV-infected, and two-dose HIV-uninfected MSM, respectively. The GMC of anti-HAV antibody at week 48 for three-dose HIV-infected MSM (2.29 ± 0.73 log10 mIU/mL) was significantly higher than that for two-dose HIV-infected MSM (1.94 ± 0.66; P < 0.01), but was lower than HIV-uninfected MSM (2.49 ± 0.42; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed higher CD4 counts (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for per 50 cells/μL increase, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.21) and undetectable plasma HIV RNA load (AOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.10-3.28) before HAV vaccination were predictive of seroconversion in HIV-infected patients.

CONCLUSION

Serologic response rate to three and two doses of HAV vaccine was similar in HIV-infected MSM, which was lower than that in HIV-uninfected MSM receiving two doses. HAV vaccination in HIV-infected patients with a higher CD4 count and suppression of HIV replication increased the seroconversion rate.

Immune response to hepatitis A vaccination in HIV-infected men in Greece

HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for acquiring hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. We evaluated the seroconversion rate (anti-HAV antibodies ≥ 20 mIU/ml) and the geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) in a group of 351 HIV infected men, who had received two doses of a hepatitis A vaccine. We analysed blood samples collected at one, six, 12 and 18 months following the administration of the second dose of the vaccine. The seroconversion rate one month after the second dose of the vaccine was 74.4% (260/351). At month 18 after the end of vaccination, 56.1% of the subjects remained seropositive. GMTs were 315, 203, 153 and 126 mIU/ml at months 1, 6, 12, and 18, respectively. Logistic regression revealed that the CD4 count is the only factor affecting response to vaccination (P = 0.019). A higher response rate and higher GMTs were observed in patients with CD4 counts ≥ 500 cells/mm(3) (76.6%) than in patients with CD4 counts 200-499 cells/mm(3). In conclusion, even in patients with near-normal CD4 counts, the response to the hepatitis A vaccine is impaired.

Hepatitis A vaccine response in HIV-infected patients: are TWINRIX and HAVRIX interchangeable?

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection remains a health risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons. Seroconversion rates among HAV vaccinated HIV-infected patients have been shown to be reduced compared to the general population. Current guidelines regard HAV vaccines as interchangeable, however there no published data comparing their efficacy in HIV patients. Our study evaluated the impact of different factors, including type of vaccination, on the immunologic response to hepatitis A vaccination in HIV-infected patients in the HAART era.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 226 HIV-infected patients at our clinic in Newark, NJ. Patients were eligible if at least one dose HAVRIX (1440 ELISA units) or TWINRIX (720 ELISA units) was administered and had anti-HAV antibody data pre- and post-vaccination. Numerous variables were evaluated for their effect on seroconversion.

RESULTS

Seroconversion developed in 53.5% of the population. Responders had higher baseline median CD4 counts (446 versus 362 cells/mm(3); P=0.004) and lower median HIV RNA levels (475 copies/mL versus 5615 copies/mL; P=0.018) than non-responders. Patients with CD4 counts>350 cell/mm(3) were more likely to respond than those with CD4 counts<200 cell/mm(3), 60% and 35%, respectively (P=0.0498). Responders were also more likely to be virologically suppressed (48% versus 32%; P=0.0024). TWINRIX recipients had a 7-fold increased probability of seroconversion when virologically suppressed and less likely to respond if the vaccination series was not completed (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.96).

DISCUSSION

Seroconversion rates to HAV vaccination are significantly impaired among HIV-infected patients. CD4 cell count and virologic suppression at vaccination impact response. Seroconversion among TWINRIX recipients appeared to be more sensitive to these factors and vaccine series completion in comparison to those administered HAVRIX. Among HIV-patients requiring hepatitis a and b vaccination, the advantage of TWINRIX over HAVRIX as a combination product should be reevaluated.

Long-term durability of immune responses after hepatitis A vaccination among HIV-infected adults

BACKGROUND

Vaccination provides long-term immunity to hepatitis A virus (HAV) among the general population, but there are no such data regarding vaccine durability among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied HIV-infected adults who had received 2 doses of HAV vaccine. We analyzed blood specimens taken at 1 year, 3 years, and, when available, 6-10 years postvaccination. HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG) values of ≥10 mIU/mL were considered seropositive.

RESULTS

We evaluated specimens from 130 HIV-infected adults with a median age of 35 years and a median CD4 cell count of 461 cells/mm(3) at or before time of vaccination. Of these, 49% had an HIV RNA load <1000 copies/mL. Initial vaccine responses were achieved in 89% of HIV-infected adults (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-94%), compared with 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%) of historical HIV-uninfected adults. Among initial HIV-infected responders with available specimens, 90% (104 of 116; 95% CI, 83%-95%) remained seropositive at 3 years and 85% (63 of 74; 95% CI, 75%-92%) at 6-10 years. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) among HIV-infected adults were 154, 111, and 64 mIU/mL at 1, 3, and 6-10 years, respectively, compared with 1734, 687, and 684 mIU/mL among HIV-uninfected persons. Higher GMCs over time among HIV-infected adults were associated with lower log(10) HIV RNA levels (β = -.12, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Most adults with well-controlled HIV infections had durable seropositive responses up to 6-10 years after HAV vaccination. Suppressed HIV RNA levels are associated with durable HAV responses.

Lower peripheral blood CD14+ monocyte frequency and higher CD34+ progenitor cell frequency are associated with HBV vaccine induced response in HIV infected individuals

We evaluated immunologic predictors of response to HBV vaccine administered in the presence or absence of GM-CSF in HIV infected individuals. We measured peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor, monocyte and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) frequencies, and expression of GMCSF receptor on monocytes and MDSCs, at baseline and 4weeks after immunization in relation to antibody response. We observed higher baseline progenitor and lower monocyte frequencies among week 16 antibody responders. Week 4 decline in MDSC frequency was associated with week 16 antibody response, while administration of GM-CSF was associated with preservation of these cells. No significant differences in GM-CSF receptor expression were observed in the presence vs. absence of GM-CSF. These findings are consistent with a positive role of progenitor cells and a potential negative role of monocytes in vaccine response. Additionally, GM-CSF augmented the preservation of peripheral blood MDSC, which may contribute to the lack of improved vaccine responses.

Effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy on vaccine-induced humoral immunity in HIV-infected adults

OBJECTIVES

The acquisition of adequate vaccine-induced humoral immunity is especially important in HIV-infected individuals, who are at increased risk of infections. The aim of the study was to assess the safety of administering a complete vaccination programme to successfully treated HIV-infected adults and to evaluate specific humoral responses and the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) interruption on these responses.

METHODS

A placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was designed and 26 HIV-infected adults enrolled. Study participants were randomized to receive either a complete immunization schedule with commercial vaccines or placebo for 12 months. HAART was then discontinued for 6 months. Specific humoral responses were evaluated at baseline, at month 12 and after HAART interruption and compared between groups.

RESULTS

There were neither local nor systemic secondary effects related to vaccination. Specific humoral responses to vaccines were adequate, but a loss of immunoglobulin G titres was observed after HAART interruption in 12 study participants.

CONCLUSIONS

HAART interruption may cause impairment of previously acquired vaccine-induced immunity in HIV-infected adults.

Virologic and immunologic correlates with the magnitude of antibody responses to the hepatitis A vaccine in HIV-infected children on highly active antiretroviral treatment

BACKGROUND

HIV-infected individuals mount poor antibody responses to vaccines. We sought to identify the immunologic and virologic factors associated with a robust response to hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine in children on highly active antiretroviral treatment.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-two pediatric highly active antiretroviral treatment recipients immunized against HAV at weeks 0 and 24 had anti-HAV antibodies, CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ cell percent assessed at weeks 0 and 32. Subgroups had HIV viremia, B- and T-cell subpopulations, and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to HAV and other stimulants measured.

RESULTS

Anti-HAV antibodies after complete vaccination correlated positively with CD4+ percent and CD19+ percent and negatively with viremia and CD8+ percent at baseline, but not at 32 weeks. There were no significant correlations between anti-HAV antibodies and B- or T-cell-naïve, memory, or activated subpopulations or non-HAV CMI. Compared with children who remained HAV-CMI-negative, those who mounted HAV-CMI in response to vaccination had higher anti-HAV antibody titers and CD19+ CD21+ CD27+ memory B cell percent at 32 weeks, but no other differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-infected children on highly active antiretroviral treatment, control of viral replication and conserved or reconstituted CD19+ and CD4+ cell numbers and function determine a robust antibody response to anti-HAV primary immunization. Our data support a bidirectional B- and T-cell cooperation in the response to the HAV vaccine.

Predictors of immunity after hepatitis A vaccination in HIV-infected persons

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection remains a health risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons. While the inactivated HAV vaccine affords protection to immunocompetent persons >95% of the time, rates of developing protective antibody (anti-HAV) in HIV+ persons are considerably lower. Although low CD4+ T-cell counts have previously been reported to be correlated with this poor response, the effect of HIV viraemia on HAV vaccine response has not previously been reported. The medical records of HIV-infected patients who had received at least one dose of HAV vaccine (Havrix, 1440 EIU) were reviewed for factors associated with the development of a protective anti-HAV response. Serological data with regard to anti-HAV status after vaccination were available in 238 patients with 133 individuals (49.6%) developing immunity after vaccination. In a logistic regression model, the only factors associated with a protective antibody response were an HIV plasma RNA level <1000 copies/mL at the time of vaccination (P = 0.011) and male gender (P = 0.016). Neither nadir CD4+ T cell count nor CD4+ T-cell count at time of vaccination were predictive of the development of anti-HAV. Suppression of HIV replication at time of vaccination is associated with a protective antibody response to HAV vaccination in HIV-infected adults. The low rate of response warrants further research in alternative strategies for HAV vaccination among HIV-infected persons.

Response to hepatitis A vaccine in HIV patients in the HAART era

We evaluated the development of hepatitis A antibody after vaccination in a large cohort of patients studied in a clinical setting after the introduction of HAART. Overall, 130 of 214 vaccinated individuals developed hepatitis A antibody. In a multivariate analysis, only the CD4 cell count at the time of vaccination was associated with an absence of response. The lack of association with the nadir CD4 cell count suggests that patients will respond to vaccine after immunological reconstitution in response to HAART.

Experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines

The lengthy history of efforts to understand the pathogenesis and means of preventing and controlling both hepatitis A and B is noteworthy for many exceptional scientific achievements. Among these are the development of vaccines to prevent the spread of infection through induction of active immunity to hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). The first plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1981 and was replaced by recombinant hepatitis B vaccines in 1986 and 1989. Vaccines to prevent HAV infection were licensed in the United States in 1995 and 1996. Subsequently, combination vaccines that included both hepatitis A and B vaccine components, or the hepatitis B component in combination with other commonly administered vaccines, were licensed in the United States. Despite significant reductions in hepatitis-related morbidity and mortality that have resulted from widespread use of these vaccines, vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality still occur. The purposes of this article are to review clinical trial and other experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines in healthy individuals as well as in those with chronic liver disease, infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, or requiring hemodialysis; describe the impact that these vaccines and national recommendations for vaccination have had on reducing the incidence of HAV and HBV infection; and recommend expansion of these recommendations to include universal vaccination of adults as a means of further reducing the burden of viral hepatitis.

Efficacy of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in HIV-infected patients: a hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) have elevated risk for hepatitis A virus (HAV) coinfection. Sequelae from coinfection include increased risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality. This study synthesizes the results of trials measuring response to HAV vaccine in HIV-infected patients using Bayesian meta-analysis methodologies. PubMed, OhioLINK/Medline, and other sources were used to search for studies analyzing response to HAV vaccine in HIV-infected patients. Studies were evaluated for quality. A Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model was used to estimate overall response to vaccine. Between-study variance was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the potential for bias. The literature search yielded eight studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis, with a combined total of 458 patients. Observed proportions of response in individual studies ranged from 50 to 95%. The intention-to-treat meta-analysis estimated a combined proportion of HIV+ patients responding to vaccine of 64% (95% CI 52-75%). Heterogeneity between studies was significant. The overall response rate to HAV vaccine in HIV-infected patients is lower than typically cited. Up to 1/2 of HIV-infected patients may be nonresponders. Future research will be required to better understand the correlates of response.

Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Hepatitis A Vaccine in HIV-Infected Children

The immunogenicity and tolerability of hepatitis A virus vaccine was evaluated in a group of 32 children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and 27 children with seroreversion. After 2 doses of vaccine, 100% of children experienced seroconversion with good toleration of the vaccine. There were no differences in variation of virus load between immunized HIV-positive children and a group of 31 nonimmunized HIV-positive children with similar characteristics.

Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine among HIV-infected subjects

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A is a major health risk for many human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals. Vaccination is a potentially attractive measure to reduce the incidence of hepatitis A among this population, but data on its safety and immunogenicity are incomplete.

METHODS

Ninety HIV-uninfected adults received an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (VAQTA; Merck), and 90 HIV-infected subjects were randomized, in double-blind fashion, to receive either the vaccine or placebo. The HIV-infected subjects were stratified by CD4 cell count, with 45 subjects having CD4 cell counts of > or =300 cells/mm3 and 45 subjects having CD4 cell counts of <300 cells/mm3. Vaccine was given at weeks 0 and 24 of the study.Results. Seroconversion rates at week 28 of the study were 94% among the HIV-infected subjects and 100% among the HIV-uninfected control subjects. HIV-infected subjects with CD4 cell counts of <300 cells/mm3 had a seroconversion rate of 87%, and HIV-infected subjects with CD4 cell counts of > or =300 cells/mm3 had a seroconversion rate of 100%. The vaccine was generally well tolerated, and no adverse effect on either HIV load or CD4 cell count was found.

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis A vaccine was both immunogenic and safe among HIV-infected subjects.

Loss of hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies after peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT)

The majority of patients with hepatitis A have a benign course, but some may develop fulminant hepatitis and hematological complications. Peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT) is associated with loss of immunity. There are no data regarding loss of HAV antibodies (anti-HAV) after PSCT. We retrospectively evaluated the persistence of anti-HAV in a nonvaccinated population that underwent PSCT. Serum detection of anti-HAV was determined before and after PSCT using a qualitative commercially available enzyme immunoassay. From January 1997 to March 2001, 136 (68%) of 201 patients tested (+) for anti-HAV prior to PSCT. Subsequent investigation of anti-HAV was possible in 36 of these patients at a median of 12 months after PSCT. The median age of patients was 47 years old; they had diagnoses of hematological malignancies (33) and solid tumors (three), and underwent autologous (31) and allogenic (five) PSCT. A total of 31 (86%) of 36 patients remained anti-HAV (+) and five (14%) became (-) after PSCT. The variables age, sex, diagnosis, type of PSCT, time of testing, and number of CD34 cells infused were not predictors of loss of anti-HAV. In conclusion, 14% of 36 nonvaccinated anti-HAV (+) patients lost their antibodies at a median of 12 months after PSCT.

Immunizations for international travel

Many infections encountered by international travelers can be prevented by adherence to personal protective measures and appropriate vaccinations. This review outlined the incidence and importance of the major vaccine-preventable infectious diseases encountered by U.S. travelers, as well as the indications, contraindications, and side effects of available vaccines. Official proof of yellow fever vaccine often is required for entry into some countries. Based on endemic or epidemic infections at destinations, planned activities, and age and medical history of international travelers, other vaccines may be recommended. Many clinicians will be familiar with some of the infections and vaccines that may be used in travelers; other vaccines may be encountered infrequently and associated with significant risk of adverse effects. Since vaccines do not provide complete protection and some travel-related infections do not have vaccines available yet (e.g., malaria and dengue fever), physicians need to be vigilant concerning febrile illness in returning travelers.

Preventing hepatitis A and hepatitis B virus infections among men who have sex with men

Hepatitis A and hepatitis B are 2 common sexually transmitted diseases that are preventable by vaccination. Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk of acquiring hepatitis A virus and hepatitis B virus through sexual exposure. Current guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that MSM receive immunizations against hepatitis A and hepatitis B. Many health care providers and most MSM are unaware of the risks and the potentially dangerous consequences posed by hepatitis A and B virus infection, and the MSM thus remain unvaccinated and unprotected from exposure to these viruses. It is important for health care providers to educate and vaccinate their at-risk male patients against hepatitis A and hepatitis B virus infections.

Prolonged hepatitis A infection in an HIV-1 seropositive patient

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a worldwide disease; in most cases, it causes an acute self-limited illness that does not lead to a chronic state. The course of HAV viremia in a homosexual male with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and the correlation between HIV and HAV viral load, alanine aminotranferase (ALT) level, and CD4(+) lymphocyte count were investigated during the course of the infection. HAV RNA was detected quantitatively up to 256 days after clinical onset. To our knowledge, this specific case is the first report of a prolonged infection with hepatitis A in a male with HIV-1. The ALT levels decreased gradually; however, 286 days after clinical onset of hepatitis, ALT levels were three times higher than normal values. HIV viral load was not affected by the infection with HAV and CD4(+) cell count was stable during the course of the co-infection. The duration and the high-titer viremia of hepatitis A virus in an immunodeficient patient constitute a serious risk of the spread of hepatitis A within this population. As inactivated HAV vaccine is safe in HIV-positive subjects, it would be wise to establish a strategy of preventive vaccination in this high-risk group.

Travel-related vaccines

Travelers are at increased risk for several infections, including familiar infections such as measles that are widely distributed but more common in developing countries. Vaccines can markedly decrease the risk for many of these infections and are an important part of pretravel preparation. Travel provides an opportunity to review and update routine vaccines in adults and assess risk from unusual infections. Global travel is growing. Persons who are elderly, HIV-infected, and immunocompromised account for many of the travelers. Studies that assess the immunogenicity, efficacy, and adverse effects of some of the special vaccines used primarily in travelers generally have been done in young, healthy populations. Findings in young adults do not apply to other populations in whom immune response can be slower, less effective, and less durable. Recent reports of severe adverse events in elderly persons who have received yellow fever vaccine are a reminder that widely used, old vaccines can have unexpected side effects when used in a new population. It is biologically plausible that adverse effects might be more common in the elderly, and epidemiologically plausible that occasional instances of similar adverse events in the past could have been missed. Studies on special and travel vaccines in the elderly are needed urgently to define how these vaccines should be used in older populations and whether alternative means for protection are needed.

Hepatitis A: old and new

The hepatitis A virus (HAV), a picornavirus, is a common cause of hepatitis worldwide. Spread of infection is generally person to person or by oral intake after fecal contamination of skin or mucous membranes; less commonly, there is fecal contamination of food or water. Hepatitis A is endemic in developing countries, and most residents are exposed in childhood. In contrast, the adult population in developed countries demonstrates falling rates of exposure with improvements in hygiene and sanitation. The export of food that cannot be sterilized, from countries of high endemicity to areas with low rates of infection, is a potentially important source of infection. After ingestion and uptake from the gastrointestinal tract, the virus replicates in the liver and is excreted into the bile. Cellular immune responses to the virus lead to destruction of infected hepatocytes with consequent development of symptoms and signs of disease. Humoral immune responses are the basis for diagnostic serologic assays. Acute HAV infection is clinically indistinguishable from other causes of acute viral hepatitis. In young children the disease is often asymptomatic, whereas in older children and adults there may be a range of clinical manifestations from mild, anicteric infection to fulminant hepatic failure. Clinical variants include prolonged, relapsing, and cholestatic forms. Management of the acute illness is supportive, and complete recovery without sequelae is the usual outcome. Research efforts during World War II led to the development of passive immunoprophylaxis. Pooled immune serum globulin is efficacious in the prevention and attenuation of disease in exposed individuals. More recently, active immunoprophylaxis by vaccination has been accomplished. Future eradication of this disease can now be contemplated.

Vaccination in HIV-infected Patients

Nearly 20 years into the HIV pandemic, vaccination of HIV-infected persons remains controversial. Although vaccine-preventable diseases are common in HIV, concerns about vaccine safety and lack of efficacy in this setting often lead to missed opportunities for vaccination. In this article, we review the literature regarding vaccine risks and benefits and offer recommendations regarding their use and timing in HIV-infected persons.

Hepatitis A in patients with chronic liver disease - severity of illness and prevention with vaccination

Acute hepatitis A in patients with pre-existing chronic liver disease (CLD) may theoretically predispose such patients to a more severe outcome of infection. The results of reports covering epidemics and case series suggest but do not universally support this possibility. An analysis of the larger case series support the suggestion that acute hepatitis A superimposed on chronic hepatitis B infection is associated with higher peak laboratory abnormalities, more severe disease and a higher fatality rate. The safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccination was evaluated in patients with CLD and found to be satisfactory for the protection of this group of patients.

Travel and the immunocompromised host

Increasing opportunities for travel and advances in medicine mean that immunocompromised patients may venture to potentially risky parts of the world. This article examines the risks faced by such travellers. Some limitations of standard travel vaccines are discussed and suggestions are made as to how best to advise such travellers.

Response to immunization with recall and neoantigens after prolonged administration of an HIV-1 protease inhibitor-containing regimen. ACTG 375 team. AIDS Clinical Trials Group

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain if immunization results in the restoration of responses to recall antigens, in the development of responses to presumed neoantigens, and to identify the virologic and immunologic correlates of these responses in persons with HIV-1 infection.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Open-label study carried out at three university-affiliated AIDS Clinical Trials Units in the United States.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one subjects participating in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 375 who had received zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir for at least 48 weeks. Subjects were immunized with tetanus toxoid (TT) at entry and with inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (hep A) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) at entry and 6 weeks. The development of antibody, lymphocyte proliferative assay (LPA), and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses after immunization were monitored.

RESULTS

The LPA and DTH responses to TT improved in 57 and 68% of participants, respectively; 73 and 65% developed enhanced LPA and DTH responses to KLH. Forty-eight percent of patients developed a four-fold increase in antibody concentration to tetanus. Seventy-three percent of patients without detectable hepatitis A antibodies at baseline developed antibodies after immunization. Eighty-three percent of patients experienced at least a four-fold rise in KLH antibody concentration. Immune activation and viral load predicted poor recall responses and the number of memory CD4+ T-cells predicted good responses to recall antigens. Naïve CD4+ T-cell numbers, decrease in viral load, increases in CD4+ and CD28+ cells, and decreases in immune activation were associated with responses to presumed neoantigens.

CONCLUSIONS

Most HIV-infected patients treated with potent combination antiretrovirals develop responses to recall and presumed neoantigens after immunization. Functional immune restoration in response to immunization is related to control of viral replication, decreased immune activation as well as to both quantitative and qualitative restoration of circulating T- lymphocyte subpopulations.

Preventive care in chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVE

To identify preventive care measures that are appropriate for and specific to patients with chronic liver disease and to provide recommendations and information that can be shared with patients.

MEASUREMENTS

A review of the literature was undertaken using MEDLINE from 1970 to present. Priority was given to randomized controlled studies, but case reports, case-control studies, and reviews were included.

MAIN RESULTS

Evidence for the avoidance of alcohol and other toxic substances, immunizations, and dietary modifications for chronic liver disease is summarized. In addition, measures that are effective in the mitigation of the complications of cirrhosis are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventive care can play an important role in patients with chronic liver diseases. Based on the existing data, the preventive strategies of alcohol avoidance, hepatitis vaccination, avoidance of NSAIDs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, iron supplementation when appropriate, and a low-fat diet are prudent in patients with chronic liver disease. Once cirrhosis develops, screening for hepatocellular cancer with alpha-fetoprotein testing and ultrasound, and screening for varices by endoscopy are justified.

Hepatitis A and HIV: a clinical review of disease and strategies for prevention

Hepatitis A, also known as infectious hepatitis, remains one of the more commonly transmitted types of viral hepatitis in the United States. Given the high prevalence of this illness, clinicians need to be aware not only about the clinical manifestations of this disease, but also about the special considerations that must be taken into account for persons coinfected with HIV. Antiretroviral management during acute hepatitis infection may be complicated by elevations of serum liver enzyme tests as well as by severe manifestations of associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. This article provides a brief overview of the clinical course of HIV infection and includes recommendations for antiretroviral medication management during acute illness. Additionally, strategies for prevention of disease are presented, with a focus on the efficacy and use of hepatitis A vaccines in persons with HIV.

Long-term follow-up of hepatitis A vaccination in children

We conducted this follow-up study to evaluate the long-term immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in children. Ninety-six children who had seroconversion to antibody to HAV (anti-HAV) after receiving a three-dose schedule of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine were enrolled into this study. Sixty months after the initial vaccination, all vaccinees who received annual follow-up still had protective levels of anti-HAV. The geometric mean titer (GMT) of anti-HAV, peaking at month 7 (4133 mIU/mL), kept declining throughout the follow-up period. The GMTs in months 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 were 1722, 896, 896, 645 and 403 mIU/mL, respectively. Nine of the vaccinees were hepatitis B virus carriers. Their anti-HAV titers tended to be lower than those of the remaining vaccinees at all time-points, but the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Natural booster was noted in one vaccinee during the follow-up period. In conclusion, inactivated hepatitis A vaccine is safe and immunogenic in children, the duration of protection against HAV infection is longer than five years.

The compromised traveler

Compromised travelers represent a diverse and challenging group of individuals. They include HIV-infected patients who are at risk for potentially adverse reactions to immunizations, and new exposures to enteric water-borne opportunistic pathogens associated with chronic infections. Such travelers may encounter unfamiliar opportunistic fungi and classical tropical infections, such as leishmaniasis, whose pathogenesis can be enhanced by the presence of prior HIV infection. Other immunocompromised groups include those who are functionally or anatomically asplenic, and patients who are iatrogenically immunosuppressed from medications utilized for solid organ transplantation, chemotherapy, or treatment of malignancies. This population of travelers also includes those with diabetes mellitus who may require adjustments in their dosing, administration, and possibly even the types of insulin used on their trips. These patients are also at greater risk for acquisition of tuberculosis, severe community-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and pyomyositis. Older travelers present both the infectious disease and travel medicine specialist with issues such events, malignancy-related infections, myocardial infarction, and other forms of cardiopulmonary compromise, which the authors address in this article.

Safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis A vaccine in patients with chronic liver disease

Acute hepatitis A superimposed on chronic liver disease (CLD) has been associated with severe or fulminant hepatitis. An open, multicenter study was performed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in patients with CLD with that in healthy subjects. A secondary objective was to compare the safety of the hepatitis A vaccine with that of a commercial hepatitis B vaccine in subjects with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 475 subjects over the age of 18 years were enrolled into 1 of 5 groups according to history, serological data, and previous diagnosis. Patients in groups 1 (healthy adults), 2 (chronic hepatitis B), 3 (chronic hepatitis C), and 5 (other CLD not caused by viral hepatitis) were vaccinated with two doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, 6 months apart. Patients in group 4 (chronic hepatitis C) received 3 doses of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, according to a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule. Local injection-site symptoms were the most common reactions reported following vaccination in all groups (35.5% of all doses), with the hepatitis B vaccine eliciting fewer injection-site symptoms than the hepatitis A vaccine (19.8% compared with 37.5%). Although a higher percentage of healthy subjects (93%) seroconverted after a single dose of the hepatitis A vaccine than did subjects with chronic hepatitis C (73.7%) or CLD of nonviral etiologies (83.1%), more than 94% of all vaccinees were seropositive for anti-HAV after the complete vaccination course. At each time point, a lower geometric mean concentration of anti-HAV was observed for each group of CLD patients compared with the healthy control subjects. In conclusion, hepatitis A vaccine was well tolerated and induced a satisfactory immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, and miscellaneous CLD.

Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in patients with chronic liver disease

The safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was evaluated in patients with chronic liver disease. Sixty hepatitis A virus antibody (anti-HAV) seronegative patients with chronic liver disease (56 chronic hepatitis B and four chronic hepatitis C) and from 17 to 47 years of age received a dose of 1440 ELISA units of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine at month 0, and a booster at month 6. Anti-HAV seroconversion (> or = 33 mIU/mL) was 57.6% (34/59) on day 15, and reached 93.2% (55/59) 1 month after primary vaccination. At month 6, the seropositivity of anti-HAV decreased before the booster to 69.0% (40/58). All vaccinees had measurable titers of anti-HAV 1 month after booster vaccination, and were still seropositive at month 12. After initial vaccination, the geometric mean titers of anti-HAV among vaccine responders were 158, 264, 74, 1309, and 409 mIU/ml at day 15 and months 1, 6, 7, and 12. Overall, 59.7% (71/119) of the vaccine doses administered were followed by mostly minor reactions. The majority of symptoms reported were local, all of which resolved within 3 days after vaccination. No significant changes in serum liver enzyme levels were detected after vaccination. Thus, an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was safe in patients with chronic liver disease while the immune response was inferior to that observed in healthy subjects reported in a previous study.

Safety and immunogenicity of a combined hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine in young healthy adults

BACKGROUND

A combination of hepatitis A and hepatitis B monovalent vaccines could offer advantages for disease control programs in terms of convenience, compliance and cost.

METHODS

Under randomized, double-blind conditions, 156 healthy young adults were divided into 3 groups to receive 1 of 3 lots of a combined hepatitis A/hepatitis B vaccine administered at months 0, 1, and 6. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed after each dose.

RESULTS

Transient and predominantly mild reactions were reported by slightly more than half the vaccinees; no serious adverse effects were relate to vaccination. One month after dose 2, all subjects had converted to the hepatitis A component. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) of antibodies of hepatitis A virus varied from 4415 to 4882 mIU/ml in the three groups. For hepatitis B, most vaccinees (73%-92%) had protective levels of antibodies to hepatitis B virus (anti-HBs) after the second dose, and all were sero-protected after the booster. Anti-HBs GMTs at month 7 ranged from 1917 to 3298 mIU/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were observed between vaccine lots. The combined hepatitis A/hepatitis B vaccine was safe and clinically well tolerated and induced immune responses quantitatively similar to those obtained with the respective monovalent vaccines.