Seronegative hepatitis C virus infection in Polish blood donors-Virological characteristics of index donations and follow-up observations

HCV core antigen plays an important role in the fight against HCV as an alternative to HCV-RNA detection

Objective

To discuss the clinical significance of HCV‐cAg testing in the diagnosis, activity determination, and monitoring of therapeutic effectiveness of HCV infection and its advantages compared with HCV‐RNA and anti‐HCV antibodies detection.

Methods

By summarizing the published literature, the advantages and significance of HCV core antigen detection were sought.

Results

The expression of HCV‐cAg is highly consistent with that of HCV‐RNA, but compared with HCV‐RNA, detection of HCV‐cAg is easy to operate, time saving, and low cost. HCV‐cAg can be detected within 12~15 days after infection, and the window period can be shortened by5~7 weeks. HCV‐cAg is a serological indicator of virus replication, which can distinguish previous infection of HCV or current infection. HCV‐cAg detection is more suitable for immunocompromised, hemodialysis, organ transplant patients. HCV‐cAg also can be used to monitor antiviral efficacy and predict sustained virological response (SVR).

Conclusion

HCV core antigen has similar clinical sensitivity to NAT and can be used as a substitute for HCV‐RNA in the diagnosis of virus infection. Combined detection of HCV‐cAg and antibody serology can help doctors detect HCV infection earlier, accurately diagnose different stages of HCV infection, and evaluate the therapeutic effect of antiviral drugs, which are beneficial in the prevention and treatment of hepatitis C.

Seronegative hepatitis C virus infection in Polish blood donors-Virological characteristics of index donations and follow-up observations

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) was implemented in Poland in 1999 for screening of plasma for fractionation and for all blood donors in 2002. To analyze seronegative NAT-positive samples representing hepatitis C virus (HCV) window-period (WP) in the years 2000 to 2016 and to determine infection outcome. We analyzed results of 17 502 739 donations screened in minipools (6-48) or individually. Index samples underwent viral load (VL) quantification, genotyping and Ag, and anti-HCV re-testing using chemiluminescence (CMIA), electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA), and fourth-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IV EIA) assays. HCV-seronegative infections were identified in 126 donations (7.2/mln donations; 95% confidential intervals, 6.0-8.6). Frequency of NAT yields was decreasing over time. Of the initial 126 seronegative index cases 106 were retested: 32.1% were reactive in IV EIA, 11.3% in ECLIA, and 1.9% in CMIA. The lowest VL correlated with absent anti-HCV and HCV Ag, while VL was highest when the antigen was detectable and then it decreased when anti-HCV appeared at a level detectable by sensitive third generation tests while retesting. The proportion of genotype 1 was 38.9% in samples positive only for HCV RNA and 71.4% in samples that were anti-HCV reactive in re-testing. In parallel, genotype 3 frequency was 50% in the former group and 21% in the latter. NAT is an effective measure to limit HCV transmission by transfusion and IV EIA seems to have higher clinical sensitivity than ECLIA. Samples representing likely successive phases of early HCV infection were characterized by different genotype distribution probably due to very early elimination of genotype 3.