1
|
Pacheco G, Lopes ALF, Oliveira APD, Corrêa WDRM, Lima LDB, Souza MHLPD, Teles AS, Nicolau LAD, Medeiros JVR. Comprehensive analysis of gastrointestinal side effects in COVID-19 patients undergoing combined pharmacological treatment with azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Toxicol 2024; 54:345-358. [PMID: 38860720 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2348169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, several drugs were repositioned and combined to quickly find a way to mitigate the effects of the infection. However, the adverse effects of these combinations on the gastrointestinal tract are unknown. We aimed investigate whether Hydroxychloroquine (HD), Azithromycin (AZ), and Ivermectin (IV) used in combination for the treatment of COVID-19, can lead to the development of gastrointestinal disorders. This is a systematic review and network meta-analysis conducted using Stata and Revman software, respectively. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023372802). A search of clinical trials in Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of Science, Lilacs, PubMed, Scopus and Clinicaltrials.gov conducted on November 26, 2023. The eligibility of the studies was assessed based on PICO criteria, including trials that compared different treatments and control group. The analysis of the quality of the evidence was carried out according to the GRADE. Six trials involving 1,686 COVID-19 patients were included. No trials on the association of HD or AZ with IV met the inclusion criteria, only studies on the association between HD and AZ were included. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain and increased transaminases were related. The symptoms of vomiting and nausea were evaluated through a network meta-analysis, while the symptom of abdominal pain was evaluated through a meta-analysis. No significant associations with these symptoms were observed for HD, AZ, or their combination, compared to control. Low heterogeneity and absence of inconsistency in indirect and direct comparisons were noted. Limitations included small sample sizes, varied drug dosages, and potential publication bias during the pandemic peak. This review unveils that there are no associations between gastrointestinal adverse effects and the combined treatment of HD with AZ in the management of COVID-19, as compared to either the use of a control group or the administration of the drugs individually, on the other hand, highlighting the very low or low certainty of evidence for the evaluated outcomes. To accurately conclude the absence of side effects, further high-quality randomized studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Pacheco
- Medicinal Plants Research Center (NPPM), Post-graduation Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil
| | - André Luis Fernandes Lopes
- Biotechnology and Biodiversity Research Center (BIOTEC), Post-graduation Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University (UFDPar), Parnaíba, PI, Brazil
| | | | | | - Lucas Daniel Batista Lima
- Biotechnology and Biodiversity Research Center (BIOTEC), Post-graduation Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University (UFDPar), Parnaíba, PI, Brazil
| | | | - Ariel Soares Teles
- Biotechnology and Biodiversity Research Center (BIOTEC), Post-graduation Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University (UFDPar), Parnaíba, PI, Brazil
- Federal Institute of Maranhão (IFMA), Araioses, MA, Brazil
| | - Lucas Antonio Duarte Nicolau
- Biotechnology and Biodiversity Research Center (BIOTEC), Post-graduation Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University (UFDPar), Parnaíba, PI, Brazil
| | - Jand Venes Rolim Medeiros
- Medicinal Plants Research Center (NPPM), Post-graduation Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil
- Biotechnology and Biodiversity Research Center (BIOTEC), Post-graduation Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University (UFDPar), Parnaíba, PI, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elshafie AH, Elsawah HK, Hammad M, Sweed EM, Seif AS, Abdel Ghaffar MM, Goda FM, Mosalam EM, Abdallah MS. Ivermectin role in COVID-19 treatment (IRICT): single-center, adaptive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2022; 20:1341-1350. [PMID: 35788169 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2098113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the efficacy and safety of ivermectin compared to hydroxychloroquine and placebo in hospitalized moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The study was an adaptive, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, single-center trial. The study was a series of 3-arm comparisons between two different investigational therapeutic agents (ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine) and a placebo. There was interim monitoring to allow early stopping for futility, efficacy, or safety. RESULTS Ivermectin decreased survival time from 29 to 18.3 days (HR, 9.8, 95%CI, 3.7-26.2), while it did not shorten the recovery time (HR, 1.02, 95%CI, 0.69-1.5). Subgroup analysis showed an association between ivermectin-related mortality and baseline oxygen saturation level. Moreover, stratified groups showed higher risk among patients on high flow O2. Hydroxychloroquine delayed recovery from 10.1 to 12.5 days (HR, 0.62, 95%CI, 0.4-0.95) and non-significantly decreased survival time from 29 to 26.8 days (HR, 1.47, 95%CI, 0.73-2.9). However, 3 months mortality rates were increased with hydroxychloroquine (RR, 2.05, 95%CI, 1.33-3.16). Neither ivermectin nor hydroxychloroquine increased adverse events and demonstrated safety profile compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS The study recommends against using either ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with any degree of severity. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is: NCT04746365.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Hanei Elshafie
- Neurology and Psychiatry Department, Shebin Elkom Teaching Hospital, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Hozaifa Khalil Elsawah
- Department of Biostatistics, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Hammad
- Neurology and Psychiatry Department, Shebin Elkom Teaching Hospital, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Eman Mohamed Sweed
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Salah Seif
- Gastrohepatology and Endemic Medicine Department, Shebin Elkom Teaching Hospital, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | | | - Feisal Mahmoud Goda
- General Surgery Department, Shebin Elkom Teaching Hospital, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | - Esraa M Mosalam
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud S Abdallah
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sadat City (USC), Sadat City, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Safety of Short-Term Treatments with Oral Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with and without COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15050634. [PMID: 35631460 PMCID: PMC9144263 DOI: 10.3390/ph15050634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have recently become the focus of global attention as possible treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The current systematic review aims to assess their safety in short treatments (≤14 days), whether used alone or in combination with other drugs. Following the PRISMA and SWiM recommendations, a search was conducted using four health databases for all relevant English-, Chinese-, and Spanish-language studies from inception through 30 July 2021. Patients treated for any condition and with any comparator were included. The outcomes of interest were early drug adverse effects and their frequency. A total of 254 articles met the inclusion criteria, including case and case-control reports as well as cross-sectional, cohort, and randomised studies. The results were summarised either qualitatively in table or narrative form or, when possible (99 studies), quantitatively in terms of adverse event frequencies. Quality evaluation was conducted using the CARE, STROBE, and JADAD tools. This systematic review showed that safety depended on drug indication. In COVID-19 patients, cardiac adverse effects, such as corrected QT interval prolongation, were relatively frequent (0–27.3% and up to 33% if combined with azithromycin), though the risk of torsade de pointes was low. Compared to non-COVID-19 patients, COVID-19 patients experienced a higher frequency of cardiac adverse effects regardless of the regimen used. Dermatological adverse effects affected 0–10% of patients with autoimmune diseases and COVID-19. A broad spectrum of neuropsychiatric adverse effects affected patients treated with CQ for malaria with variable frequencies and some cases were reported in COVID-19 patients. Gastrointestinal adverse effects occurred regardless of drug indication affecting 0–50% of patients. In conclusion, CQ and HCQ are two safe drugs widely used in the treatment of malaria and autoimmune diseases. However, recent findings on their cardiac and neuropsychiatric adverse effects should be considered if these drugs were to be proposed as antivirals again.
Collapse
|
4
|
Li ZY, Xie ZJ, Li HC, Wang JJ, Wen XH, Wu SY, Chen J, Zhang JJ, Li L, Guo QQ, Liu QP, Lan H, Jiang YP, Li DM, Xu XF, Song SY, Zhang M, Fang S, Lai WD, Gao YN, Zhang FQ, Luo WQ, Lou Y, Chen W, Zhang XF, Wang KE, Zhou MQ, He YF, Xi AR, Gao Y, Zhang Y, Chen YL, Wen CP. Guidelines on the treatment with integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine for severe coronavirus disease 2019. Pharmacol Res 2021; 174:105955. [PMID: 34715330 PMCID: PMC8553423 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by numerous complications, complex disease, and high mortality, making its treatment a top priority in the treatment of COVID-19. Integrated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and western medicine played an important role in the prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation of COVID-19 during the epidemic. However, currently there are no evidence-based guidelines for the integrated treatment of severe COVID-19 with TCM and western medicine. Therefore, it is important to develop an evidence-based guideline on the treatment of severe COVID-19 with integrated TCM and western medicine, in order to provide clinical guidance and decision basis for healthcare professionals, public health personnel, and scientific researchers involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of COVID-19 patients. We developed and completed the guideline by referring to the standardization process of the "WHO handbook for guideline development", the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Yu Li
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Jun Xie
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Chang Li
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Jian Wang
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiang-Hui Wen
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shou-Yuan Wu
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jiao Chen
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Lin Li
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Qiu-Ping Liu
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hui Lan
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | | | - Dian-Ming Li
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Feng Xu
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Si-Yue Song
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shan Fang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Dong Lai
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Ni Gao
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feng-Qi Zhang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Qing Luo
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yu Lou
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wu Chen
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Ke-Er Wang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Yuan-Fang He
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - An-Ran Xi
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yao-Long Chen
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Lanzhou University Institute of Health Data Science, Lanzhou, China; Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou, China; Guideline International Network Asia, Lanzhou, China; WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Felsenstein S, Reiff AO. A hitchhiker's guide through the COVID-19 galaxy. Clin Immunol 2021; 232:108849. [PMID: 34563684 PMCID: PMC8461017 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2021.108849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Numerous reviews have summarized the epidemiology, pathophysiology and the various therapeutic aspects of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but a practical guide on "how to treat whom with what and when" based on an understanding of the immunological background of the disease stages remains missing. This review attempts to combine the current knowledge about the immunopathology of COVID-19 with published evidence of available and emerging treatment options. We recognize that the information about COVID-19 and its treatment is rapidly changing, but hope that this guide offers those on the frontline of this pandemic an understanding of the host response in COVID-19 patients and supports their ongoing efforts to select the best treatments tailored to their patient's clinical status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Felsenstein
- University of Liverpool, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
| | - Andreas Otto Reiff
- Arthritis & Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boudesseul J, Zerhouni O, Harbert A, Rubinos C. Keeping Meta-Analyses Hygienic During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health 2021; 9:722458. [PMID: 34660516 PMCID: PMC8511714 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the massive distribution of different vaccines globally, the current pandemic has revealed the crucial need for an efficient treatment against COVID-19. Meta-analyses have historically been extremely useful to determine treatment efficacy but recent debates about the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients resulted in contradictory meta-analytical results. Different factors during the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted key features of conducting a good meta-analysis. Some meta-analyses did not evaluate or treat substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 75%); others did not include additional analysis for publication bias; none checked for evidence of p–hacking in the primary studies nor used recent methods (i.e., p-curve or p-uniform) to estimate the average population-size effect. These inconsistencies may contribute to contradictory results in the research evaluating COVID-19 treatments. A prominent example of this is the use of hydroxychloroquine, where some studies reported a large positive effect, whereas others indicated no significant effect or even increased mortality when hydroxychloroquine was used with the antibiotic azithromycin. In this paper, we first recall the benefits and fundamental steps of good quality meta-analysis. Then, we examine various meta-analyses on hydroxychloroquine treatments for COVID-19 patients that led to contradictory results and causes for this discrepancy. We then highlight recent tools that contribute to evaluate publication bias and p-hacking (i.e., p-curve, p-uniform) and conclude by making technical recommendations that meta-analyses should follow even during extreme global events such as a pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordane Boudesseul
- Facultad de Psicología, Instituto de Investigación Científica, Universidad de Lima, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Allie Harbert
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Clio Rubinos
- Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang CW, Ha HA, Tsai SC, Lu CC, Lee CY, Tsai YF, Tsai FJ, Chiu YJ, Wang GK, Hsu CH, Yang JS. In Silico Target Analysis of Treatment for COVID-19 Using Huang-Lian-Shang-Qing-Wan, a Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula. Nat Prod Commun 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/1934578x211030818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the significantly negative impact of the coronavirus (CoV) disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the health of the community and the economy, it remains urgent and necessary to develop a safe and effective treatment method for COVID-19. Huang-Lian-Shang-Qing-Wan (HLSQW) is a herbal formula of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) that has been applied extensively for treating “wind-heat-associated” symptoms in the upper parts of the body. The objective of the present in silico study was to investigate the potential effects of HLSQW in the context of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 infection. We analyzed the possible interactions between bioactive compounds within HLSQW on targets that may confer antiviral activity using network pharmacology and pharmacophore-based screening. HLSQW was found to potentially target a number of pathways and the expression of various genes to regulate cell physiology and, consequently, the anti-viral effects against SARS-CoV-2. Bioactive compounds contained within HLSQW may exert combined effects to reduce the production of proinflammatory factors, which may trigger the “cytokine storm” in patients with severe COVID-19. Results from molecular modeling suggested that the bioactive HLSQW components puerarin, baicalin, and daidzin exhibit high binding affinity to the active site of 3-chymotrypsin-like cysteine protease (3CLpro) to form stable ligand-protein complexes, thereby suppressing SARS-CoV-2 replication. In addition, our results also demonstrated protective effects of the HLSQW extract against cell injury induced by the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, against reactive oxygen species production and nuclear factor-κB activity in normal human lung cells in vitro. To conclude, HLSQW is a potential TCM remedy that warrants further study with the aim of developing an effective treatment for COVID-19 in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Wen Huang
- Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University,
Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hai-Anh Ha
- China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam
| | | | - Chi-Cheng Lu
- National Taiwan University of Sport, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Yuh-Feng Tsai
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University,
Taipei, Taiwan
- Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fuu-Jen Tsai
- China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Chiu
- Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Guo-Kai Wang
- Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Research & Development of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Chung-Hua Hsu
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University,
Taipei, Taiwan
- Branch of Linsen, Chinese Medicine, and Kunming, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jai-Sing Yang
- China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
González Rodríguez P, Pérez-Moneo Agapito B, Albi Rodríguez MS, Aizpurua Galdeano P, Aparicio Rodrigo M, Fernández Rodríguez MM, Esparza Olcina MJ, Ochoa Sangrador C. [COVID-19: Critical appraisal of the evidence]. An Pediatr (Barc) 2021; 95:207.e1-207.e13. [PMID: 38620739 PMCID: PMC8173476 DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2021.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We present the summary of a critical appraisal document of the available evidence on COVID-19, developed with a clinical practice guide format following GRADE methodology. The document tries to provide answers to a series of structured clinical questions, with an explicit definition of the population, intervention/exposure, comparison and outcome, and a rating of the clinical relevance of the outcome measures. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to answer the questions, grouped into six chapters: epidemiology, clinical practice, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and vaccination. We assessed the risk of bias of the selected studies with standard instruments (RoB-2, ROBINS-I, QUADAS and Newcastle-Ottawa). We constructed evidence tables and, when necessary and possible, meta-analysis of the of the most relevant outcome measures. We followed the GRADE system to synthesize the evidence, assessing its quality, and, when appropriate, giving recommendations, rated according to the quality of the evidence, the values and preferences, the balance between benefits, risks and costs, equity and feasibility.
Collapse
|
9
|
González Rodríguez P, Pérez-Moneo Agapito B, Albi Rodríguez MS, Aizpurua Galdeano P, Aparicio Rodrigo M, Fernández Rodríguez MM, Esparza Olcina MJ, Ochoa Sangrador C. COVID-19: Critical appraisal of the evidence. An Pediatr (Barc) 2021; 95:207.e1-207.e13. [PMID: 34380606 PMCID: PMC8299218 DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We present the summary of a critical appraisal document of the available evidence on COVID-19, developed with a clinical practice guide format following GRADE methodology. The document tries to provide answers to a series of structured clinical questions, with an explicit definition of the population, intervention / exposure, comparison and outcome, and a rating of the clinical relevance of the outcome measures. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to answer the questions, grouped into six chapters: epidemiology, clinical practice, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and vaccination. We assessed the risk of bias of the selected studies with standard instruments (RoB-2, ROBINS-I, QUADAS and Newcastle-Ottawa). We constructed evidence tables and, when necessary and possible, meta-analysis of the of the most relevant outcome measures. We followed the GRADE system to synthesise the evidence, assessing its quality, and, when appropriate, giving recommendations, rated according to the quality of the evidence, the values and preferences, the balance between benefits, risks and costs, equity and feasibility.
Collapse
|
10
|
Han YJ, Lee KH, Yoon S, Nam SW, Ryu S, Seong D, Kim JS, Lee JY, Yang JW, Lee J, Koyanagi A, Hong SH, Dragioti E, Radua J, Smith L, Oh H, Ghayda RA, Kronbichler A, Effenberger M, Kresse D, Denicolò S, Kang W, Jacob L, Shin H, Shin JI. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of in vitro, in vivo, and clinical trials. Am J Cancer Res 2021; 11:1207-1231. [PMID: 33391531 PMCID: PMC7738873 DOI: 10.7150/thno.48342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide and poses a threat to humanity. However, no specific therapy has been established for this disease yet. We conducted a systematic review to highlight therapeutic agents that might be effective in treating COVID-19. Methods: We searched Medline, Medrxiv.org, and reference lists of relevant publications to identify articles of in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies on treatments for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and COVID-19 published in English until the last update on October 11, 2020. Results: We included 36 studies on SARS, 30 studies on MERS, and 10 meta-analyses on SARS and MERS in this study. Through 12,200 title and 830 full-text screenings for COVID-19, eight in vitro studies, 46 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 6,886 patients, and 29 meta-analyses were obtained and investigated. There was no therapeutic agent that consistently resulted in positive outcomes across SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. Remdesivir showed a therapeutic effect for COVID-19 in two RCTs involving the largest number of total participants (n = 1,461). Other therapies that showed an effect in at least two RCTs for COVID-19 were sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (n = 114), colchicine (n = 140), IFN-β1b (n = 193), and convalescent plasma therapy (n = 126). Conclusions: This review provides information to help establish treatment and research directions for COVID-19 based on currently available evidence. Further RCTs are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Joo Han
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Keum Hwa Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sojung Yoon
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seoung Wan Nam
- Department of Rheumatology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Seohyun Ryu
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dawon Seong
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Seok Kim
- Department of Nephrology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Young Lee
- Department of Nephrology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Won Yang
- Department of Nephrology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinhee Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Ai Koyanagi
- Research and development unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu/CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,ICREA, Pg. Lluis Companys 23, 08010, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sung Hwi Hong
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, USA
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Joaquim Radua
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lee Smith
- The Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hans Oh
- School of Social Work, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Ramy Abou Ghayda
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, USA.,Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andreas Kronbichler
- Department of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Effenberger
- Department of Internal Medicine I (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology & Metabolism), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniela Kresse
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Johann County Hospital, St. Johann in Tirol, Austria
| | - Sara Denicolò
- Department of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Woosun Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA
| | - Louis Jacob
- Research and development unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu/CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Hanwul Shin
- Department of Nephrology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Il Shin
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,✉ Corresponding author: Dr. Jae Il Shin MD PhD, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-2050, Fax: 82-2-393-9118, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|