GLIM-defined malnutrition and overall survival in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Dissecting the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in advanced cancer: Reduced intake vs. inflammation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria have been recommended for the diagnosis of malnutrition. It requires that the patient meets at least one phenotypic criterion and at least one aetiological criterion. For the latter, the patient must either demonstrate reduced food intake or have evidence of systemic inflammation. As both are common in advanced cancer, the aim of the present study was to determine, in patients who met the GLIM phenotypical criteria, which GLIM aetiological criteria (reduced food intake or systemic inflammation) is most useful in predicting overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Data from two cancer biobanks were combined. Inclusion criteria were: ≥18 years, advanced cancer (stage III or IV) and ability to provide written consent. Weight loss (WL) was selected as the phenotypic criterion of choice, as preliminary analysis demonstrated it to be a superior predictor of OS compared to body mass index. Malnutrition type 1 was defined as >5 % WL over 6 months and a C reactive protein (CRP) ≥3 mg/l. Further analysis was performed with a CRP >10 mg/l cut-off. Malnutrition type 2 was defined as >5 % WL over 6 months and reduced food intake, as reported in the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methodology, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models, with hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) reported.

RESULTS

In total, 176 patients were studied, with 147 events observed. The 3-month mortality rate was 32.4 % (CI: 25.1 to 39.0) and the 1-year mortality rate was 71.8 % (CI: 63.8 to 78.0). Malnutrition type 1 and malnutrition type 2 were observed in 37.8 % (HR: 2.27 [CI: 1.54 to 3.33], p < 0.001) and 26.3 % (HR: 1.74 [CI: 1.19 to 2.54], p = 0.005) of patients respectively, with both significantly increasing the risk of death. Following adjustment for relevant confounders both malnutrition type 1 (HR: 1.92 [CI: 1.25 to 2.94], p = 0.003) and malnutrition type 2 (HR: 1.61 [CI: 1.09 to 2.38], p = 0.019) remained significant predictors of OS. Median survival for patients with malnutrition type 1 was 2.14 (CI: 1.74 to 4.90) months compared to 9.5 (6.94-13.64) months for those without (p < 0.001). For malnutrition type 2, this was 2.37 (CI: 1.64 to 5.46) vs. 7.40 months (CI: 6.08 to 10.16), p = 0.004. When the CRP threshold was increased to >10 mg/l, malnutrition type 1 was observed in fewer patients (30.4%), median survival was shorter (1.91 [CI: 1.25 to 2.99] vs. 9.86 months [CI: 7.27 to 14.7], p < 0.001) and in both univariable (HR: 2.91 [CI: 1.94 to 4.63], p < 0.001) and multivariable (HR: 2.32 [CI: 1.50 to 3.60], p < 0.001) analyses, the risk of death increased.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the inflammatory component of GLIM appears superior compared to reduced intake in predicting OS and notably, a higher CRP threshold correlates with shorter OS. Therefore, whilst GLIM has multiple potential combinations, all treated with equal regard, these data suggest that the inflammatory aetiological component should be hierarchical to others.

Malnutrition Diagnosed via Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Criteria - Association with Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Value: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

OBJECTIVES

Malnutrition is very common in people with cancer. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) recommendation on criteria has been proposed as a gold standard for diagnosing malnutrition. The diagnosis of malnutrition includes phenotypic criteria such as unintentional weight loss and etiologic criteria such as reduced food intake. The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence on the GLIM-defined malnutrition association with clinical outcomes and its predictive value.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases. A total of 6 systematic reviews with and without meta-analysis were identified and included for analysis. Five were systematic reviews with meta-analyses and 1 systematic review without meta-analysis.

RESULTS

GLIM-defined malnutrition is associated with decreased survival, disease-free survival, increased post-operative complications, increased overall complications, and prolonged length of stay. It has predictive value for worsening clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results support the use of GLIM criteria and indicate their predictive value for clinical outcomes. There is robust evidence indicating the association and predictive value of GLIM-defined malnutrition for clinical outcomes in people with cancer to recommend its use in clinical practice. Thus, the GLIM criteria depend on prior screening tools used and the consistency of muscle mass assessment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nutrition care is a fundamental aspect of cancer nursing practice and nurses need to be aware of the signs of malnutrition. The GLIM criteria are relevant to be used also in cancer nursing practice for the early detection of malnutrition among people with cancer.

Malnutrition Diagnosed by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Several reviews have highlighted that the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is the best diagnostic tool for assessing nutritional status in cancer patients. However, previous meta-analyses summarizing the prevalence of malnutrition and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer are quite limited. This study aims to determine the overall prevalence and association between malnutrition, as defined by the PG-SGA, and mortality in adults with GI cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of articles published from 2005 to 2023 was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Sciences and Scopus. The PRISMA guideline was followed to organize the entire content. A random-effects meta-analysis model using R Studio was performed to quantify the pooled proportion and hazard ratios (HRs). Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plots. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and Baujat plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the protocol number CRD42023465685.

RESULTS

In this study, 46 publications with 23,235 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of malnutrition among adults with GI cancer, as determined by the PG-SGA, was 61% (95% CI: 51%-70%, I2 = 99%). The pooled prevalence of moderate and severe malnutrition were 38% (95% CI: 31%-45%, I2 = 96%) and 21% (95% CI: 13%-31%, I2 = 98%), respectively. By cancer type, malnutrition was more common in patients with oesophageal cancer (78%, 95% CI: 45%-94%, I2 = 99%) and gastric cancer (75%, 95% CI: 68%-81%, I2 = 87%). Additionally, the overall risk (pooled HR) of malnutrition on mortality among GI cancer patients was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.63%-2.5%, I2 = 23%).

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition is common in adults with GI cancer and doubles the risk of all-cause mortality. These results emphasize the importance of ongoing efforts in prevention, early assessment, and intervention for malnutrition to minimize mortality rates.

Global prevalence and moderating factors of malnutrition in colorectal cancer survivors: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to estimate the global prevalence of severe, moderate, overall malnutrition and moderating factors of malnutrition in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, CINAHL, Medline-OVID, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to February 8, 2024, without language, region, or publication date restrictions. A generalized linear mixed model and random-effects model were used to examine the pooled prevalence, and moderator analyses were implemented to investigate variations in the pooled prevalence.

RESULTS

In 35 studies involving 9,278 colorectal cancer survivors, the global prevalence was 12.10% for severe malnutrition (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.28-16.92; n = 507), 33.13% for moderate malnutrition (95% CI: 28.93-37.34; n: 2,192), and 47.78% for overall malnutrition (95% CI: 41.60-53.96; n: 3,812). Asia showed higher rates of severe malnutrition 16.67% (95% CI: 4.66-28.68, n: 232) and overall malnutrition 53.17% (95% CI: 39.66-66.69, n: 1,913), whereas low-middle income countries demonstrated higher rates of overall malnutrition 67.46% (95% CI: 30.25-100.00, n: 82). Male sex, colon cancer, advanced stage, metastasis, chemotherapy, surgery, adjuvant treatment, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and diabetes significantly moderated overall malnutrition prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis reports detailed data on the global prevalence of CRC survivors experience malnutrition, highlighting that health-care professionals should consider the identified moderating factors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Addressing malnutrition in CRC survivors is critical, as early and proactive nutritional management can enhance recovery, improve quality of life, and potentially reduce cancer-related complications associated with malnutrition.

Malnutrition is associated with clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia and other lung manifestations: A retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is a highly prevalent condition in patients who are critically ill that has been previously associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The aims of this study are to describe the prevalence of malnutrition using Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and analyze the associations with clinical outcomes using original criteria or the presence of one phenotypic criterion with inflammation measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with pneumonia and other lung manifestations who are mechanically ventilated.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who are critically ill. Malnutrition was classified using the original GLIM criteria (reduced muscle mass and the assumption of present inflammation because of critical illness) and one phenotypic criterion with severe inflammation (CRP >5 mg/dl). Associations between both groups with clinical outcomes (duration of invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV], length of stay [LOS] on ICU, hospital LOS, ICU mortality, and prolonged ICU LOS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-four patients who were critically ill were included. The prevalence of malnutrition in the established methods GLIM and phenotypic criterion with severe inflammation was 38.4% and 27.7%, respectively. Patients who survived and were diagnosed with malnutrition using inflammation criterion at baseline had longer hospital LOS (31 vs 25 days, P = 0.04). After adjusting for age, clinical diagnosis at admission, and SOFA and APACHE II scores, phenotypic criterion with severe inflammation was associated with duration of IMV (β: 5.7; 95% confidence interval: 0.7-10.7; P = 0.02) and ICU LOS (β: 6.1; 95% CI: 0.8-11.5; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition considering a phenotypic criterion and CRP >5 mg/dl upon ICU admission was associated with duration of IMV and ICU LOS.

Comparison of three objective nutritional screening tools for identifying GLIM-defined malnutrition in patients with gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare three objective nutritional screening tools for identifying GLIM-defined malnutrition in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

METHOD

Objective nutritional screening tools including geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, were evaluated in patients with GC at our institution. Malnutrition was diagnosed according to the GLIM criteria. The diagnostic value of GNRI, PNI, and COUNT scores in identifying GLIM-defined malnutrition was assessed by conducting Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Additionally, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. The Kappa coefficient (k) was used to assess agreement between three objective nutritional screening tools and GLIM criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 316 patients were enrolled in this study, and malnutrition was diagnosed in 151 (47.8%) patients based on the GLIM criteria. The GNRI demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.805, 95% CI: 0.758-0.852) for detecting GLIM-defined malnutrition, while the PNI and COUNT score showed poor diagnostic accuracy with AUCs of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.641-0.757) and 0.665 (95% CI: 0.605-0.725) respectively. Among these objective nutritional screening tools, the GNRI-based malnutrition risk assessment demonstrated the highest specificity (80.0%), accuracy (72.8%), PPV (74.8%), NPV (71.4%), and consistency (k = 0.452) with GLIM-defined malnutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to PNI and COUNT scores, GNRI demonstrated superior performance as an objective nutritional screening tool for identifying GLIM-defined malnutrition in GC patients.

Exploring the intersections of frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia with malnutrition

This review examines our current understanding of consensus definitions for frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia and their perceived overlap with malnutrition. Patients with these syndromes will often meet the criteria for malnutrition. It is common for these overlap syndromes to be misapplied by practitioners, and confusion has been further exacerbated by the lack of a common malnutrition language. To address the latter concern, we recommend using either the standalone Global Leadership Initiative in Malnutrition (GLIM) framework or the GLIM consensus criteria integrated with other accepted approaches as dictated by preference and available resources. Established care standards should guide the recognition and treatment of malnutrition to promote optimal clinical outcomes and quality of life. The effectiveness of nutrition interventions may be reduced in settings of severe acute inflammation and in end-stage disease that is associated with cachexia. However, such interventions may still assist patients to tolerate treatments that target the underlying etiology for an overlap syndrome, and they may help to improve select clinical outcomes and quality of life. Recent, large, well-designed randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the compelling positive clinical effects of medical nutrition therapy. The application of concurrent malnutrition risk screening and assessment is therefore a high priority. The necessity to deliver specific interventions that target the underlying mechanisms of these overlap syndromes and also diagnose and address malnutrition is paramount. It must be highlighted that securing beneficial outcomes for frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia will also require nonnutrition interventions, like comprehensive care plans, pharmacologic agents, and prescribed exercise.

Preoperative malnutrition in elderly gastric cancer patients and adverse postoperative outcomes of radical gastrectomy

Malnutrition is not only a prevalent condition among the elderly but also a common comorbidity in elderly people with gastric cancer (GC). Malnutrition is closely linked to high rates of postoperative complications and poor wound healing in elderly GC patients, which may lead to a higher incidence and mortality rate of GC. Malnutrition decreases the physical function of elderly GC patients after surgery, severely affecting their postoperative life quality and hindering subsequent treatments. This retrospective study was conducted by Zhao et al, focusing on the clinical baseline data, postoperative complications, and hospitalization times of elderly GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. Additionally, the underlying causes of poor outcomes for patients were discussed. This study may provide a solid basis for the clinical treatment of elderly GC patients in the future. Therefore, malnutrition can serve as a negative prognostic factor for curative surgery in GC patients. Addressing malnutrition and its adverse effects can benefit elderly GC patients from surgical treatment.

Comparative Study of Different Inflammation Definition Methods of GLIM in the Diagnosis of Malnutrition in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the influence of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) on diagnosing malnutrition in acute pancreatitis (AP) based on various inflammatory criteria.

Patients and Methods

A total of 258 AP patients admitted to a large medical center between June 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent evaluation using the original GLIM and GLIM criteria based on C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and CRP/albumin ratio (CAR). The study explored the impact of malnutrition diagnosis using different GLIM criteria on various clinical outcomes of AP patients and assessed the agreement of different GLIM criteria compared to the original GLIM.

Results

Thirty-seven (14.34%) patients were malnourished according to the original GLIM criteria. Using the other four criteria, malnutrition rates ranged from 6.59% to 12.40%. Malnutrition diagnosed by all GLIM criteria was associated with local complications. Malnutrition identified by the original, CRP-based, and CAR-based GLIM criteria was also associated with infectious complications and composite outcomes. Meanwhile, albumin-based malnutrition was associated with all adverse outcomes except organ failure. When considering all four GLIM criteria except the original one, malnourished patients exhibited longer lengths of stay than non-malnourished patients. Under the CRP- and albumin-based GLIM criteria, hospitalization costs were higher for malnourished patients. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results. The agreement of the four GLIM criteria with the original GLIM criteria were consistent with the corresponding incidence of malnutrition.

Conclusion

This study validated the GLIM criteria for the first time in AP. Malnourished patients were more likely to experience local complications than non-malnourished AP patients. However, the inconsistency between GLIM criteria based on disease burden and various inflammatory markers was significant. The inflammatory marker-based GLIM criteria demonstrated a stronger predictive value than the original GLIM criteria in assessing prognosis in AP patients.

Clinical Impact of Malnutrition According to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria Combined With Kidney Dysfunction to Determine Mortality in Inpatients

OBJECTIVE

The clinical impact of malnutrition based on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients with kidney dysfunction remains poorly understood. This study investigated the usefulness of GLIM criteria for malnutrition in predicting mortality in patients with kidney dysfunction and different clinical renal states, including no kidney disease (NKD), acute kidney injury (AKI), and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included 6,712 patients aged ≥18 admitted between 2018 and 2019. The relationship between the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups, nutritional status based on the GLIM criteria, and the incidence of all-cause mortality was evaluated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Malnutrition was defined as at least one phenotype (weight loss, low body mass index, or reduced muscle mass) and one etiological criterion (reduced intake/assimilation or disease burden/inflammation).

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that eGFR ≤29 (vs. eGFR: 60-89, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-2.22), 30-59 (vs. eGFR: 60-89, adjusted HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.20-1.64), and ≥90 (vs. eGFR: 60-89, adjusted HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.71), moderate and severe malnutrition (vs. without malnutrition, adjusted HR = 1.38 [1.18-1.62] and 2.18 [1.86-2.54], respectively) were independently associated with the incidence of death. The all-cause mortality rate was higher in patients with malnutrition or eGFR ≤29 (adjusted HR, 3.31; 95% CI: 2.51-4.35) than in patients without malnutrition or eGFR 60-89. Furthermore, moderate and severe malnutrition (vs. no malnutrition) was independently associated with death in patients with NKD, AKI, and CKD.

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition based on the GLIM criteria was associated with increased all-cause mortality in inpatients, and malnutrition combined with kidney dysfunction was associated with a higher risk of mortality. Furthermore, patients with NKD, AKI, and CKD showed an association between malnutrition based on GLIM criteria and mortality.

The Clinical Impact of Time-restricted Eating on Cancer: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

In the face of the growing global burden of cancer, there is increasing interest in dietary interventions to mitigate its impacts. Pre-clinical evidence suggests that time-restricted eating (TRE), a type of intermittent fasting, induces metabolic effects and alterations in the gut microbiome that may impede carcinogenesis. Research on TRE in cancer has progressed to human studies, but the evidence has yet to be synthesized.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical and/or metabolomic effects of TRE compared with ad libitum eating or alternative diets in people with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science Core Collection (ESCI, CPCI-SSH, CPCI-S), and SCOPUS were searched up to January 4, 2023, using the core concepts of "intermittent fasting" and "cancer." Original study designs, protocols, and clinical trial registries were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

After evaluating 13 900 results, 24 entries were included, consisting of 8 full articles, 2 abstracts, 1 published protocol and 13 trial registries. All data were extracted, compared, and critically analyzed.

DATA ANALYSIS

There was heterogeneity in the patient population (eg, in tumor sites), TRE regimens (eg, degree of restriction, duration), and clinical end points. A high rate (67-98%) of TRE adherence was observed, alongside improvements in quality of life. Four articles assessed cancer markers and found a reduction in tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen, reduced rates of recurrence, and a sustained major molecular response, following TRE. Five articles demonstrated modified cancer risk factors, including beneficial effects on body mass index, adiposity, glucoregulation, and inflammation in as short a period as 8 weeks. None of the completed studies assessed the effect of TRE on the microbiome, but analysis of the microbiome is a planned outcome in 2 clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary findings suggest that TRE is feasible and acceptable by people with cancer, may have oncological benefits, and improves quality of life.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration No. CRD42023386885.

Validation of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis

Background and Aim

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) has proposed criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition. No studies validated the GLIM criteria in acute pancreatitis (AP). The present study aimed to validate the predictive capacity of GLIM criteria for adverse outcomes in AP patients.

Patients and Methods

Clinical data of 269 patients with AP were analyzed retrospectively. The Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) was chosen as the screening tool. Multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluated the adverse clinical outcomes in malnourished patients.

Results

Overall, 160 patients (59.5%) were at nutritional risk and 38 (14.1%) were malnourished. Reduced muscle mass/ low body mass index + inflammation combinations contributed most to malnutrition overall and in each subgroup. The malnourished group had lower hemoglobin, neutrophils, albumin, total cholesterol, and triglycerides than the well-nourished group. The malnourished group had higher hospitalization costs (CNY, 11319.34 vs 9258.22, p <0.001) and more local complications (34.2% vs 14.7%, p =0.009) than the well-nourished group. There was an interaction between malnutrition and overweight/obesity on local complications (p for interaction = 0.023). Multivariate logistic regression showed malnutrition was significantly associated with local complications (OR 12.2, 95% CI: 2.51-59.37), infectious complications (OR 9.95, 95% CI: 1.25-79.44) and composite adverse outcome (OR 4.78, 95% CI: 1.05-21.73) in the overweight/obesity subgroup. There was no association between malnutrition and the rate of various adverse outcomes in the non-overweight/obesity subgroup. Additionally, we observed an association between malnutrition and composite adverse outcome (OR 6.75, 95% CI: 1.49-30.68) in patients <70 years only in females.

Conclusion

Malnourished AP patients were more likely to have adverse outcomes than well-nourished patients. Malnutrition was associated with various adverse outcomes only in the overweight/obesity subgroups.

Nutritional Status as a Prognostic Factor for Survival in Palliative Care: A Retrospective Observational Analysis of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients with Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction

Palliative care patients with malignant bowel obstruction are particularly at risk of developing malnutrition, which in turn directly shortens survival time and worsens quality of life (QoL). According to the available data, the survival time in this patient group is often less than three months. To avoid further complications related to malnutrition and poor outcomes in oncological therapy, nutritional therapy such as home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is offered. The aim of this study was to investigate whether nutritional status is a prognostic factor for survival in palliative care patients with malignant inoperable bowel obstruction qualified for home parenteral nutrition and which nutritional assessment tool has the most accurate prognostic value. This retrospective observational analysis included 200 patients with malignant bowel obstruction referred for home parenteral nutrition between January 2018 and August 2023. The analysis included laboratory test results, body mass index (BMI), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and malnutrition as defined by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). The average survival time of the patients was 75 days. Patients with higher NRI and PNI scores were more likely to survive (NRI: p < 0.001; PNI: p < 0.001). The GLIM criteria, SGA scores and BMI values did not prove to be good prognostic factors for survival (GLIM p = 0.922, SGA p = 0.083, BMI p = 0.092). The results suggest that the use of NRI and PNI may be helpful in prognosing survival in these patients and that prevention of the development of malnutrition through earlier nutritional assessment and intervention should be considered in this patient group.

Guidance for assessment of the inflammation etiologic criterion for the GLIM diagnosis of malnutrition: A modified Delphi approach

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach to malnutrition diagnosis is based on assessment of three phenotypic (weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced skeletal muscle mass) and two etiologic (reduced food intake/assimilation and disease burden/inflammation) criteria, with diagnosis confirmed by fulfillment of any combination of at least one phenotypic and at least one etiologic criterion. The original GLIM description provided limited guidance regarding assessment of inflammation and this has been a factor impeding further implementation of the GLIM criteria. We now seek to provide practical guidance for assessment of inflammation in support of the etiologic criterion for inflammation.

METHODS

A GLIM-constituted working group with 36 participants developed consensus-based guidance through a modified-Delphi review. A multi-round review and revision process served to develop seven guidance statements.

RESULTS

The final round of review was highly favorable with 99 % overall "agree" or "strongly agree" responses. The presence of acute or chronic disease, infection or injury that is usually associated with inflammatory activity may be used to fulfill the GLIM disease burden/inflammation criterion, without the need for laboratory confirmation. However, we recommend that recognition of underlying medical conditions commonly associated with inflammation be supported by C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements when the contribution of inflammatory components is uncertain. Interpretation of CRP requires that consideration be given to the method, reference values, and units (mg/dL or mg/L) for the clinical laboratory that is being used.

CONCLUSION

Confirmation of inflammation should be guided by clinical judgement based upon underlying diagnosis or condition, clinical signs, or CRP.

Guidance for assessment of the inflammation etiologic criterion for the GLIM diagnosis of malnutrition: A modified Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach to malnutrition diagnosis is based on assessment of three phenotypic (weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced skeletal muscle mass) and two etiologic (reduced food intake/assimilation and disease burden/inflammation) criteria, with diagnosis confirmed by fulfillment of any combination of at least one phenotypic and at least one etiologic criterion. The original GLIM description provided limited guidance regarding assessment of inflammation, and this has been a factor impeding further implementation of the GLIM criteria. We now seek to provide practical guidance for assessment of inflammation.

METHODS

A GLIM-constituted working group with 36 participants developed consensus-based guidance through a modified Delphi review. A multiround review and revision process served to develop seven guidance statements.

RESULTS

The final round of review was highly favorable, with 99% overall "agree" or "strongly agree" responses. The presence of acute or chronic disease, infection, or injury that is usually associated with inflammatory activity may be used to fulfill the GLIM disease burden/inflammation criterion, without the need for laboratory confirmation. However, we recommend that recognition of underlying medical conditions commonly associated with inflammation be supported by C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements when the contribution of inflammatory components is uncertain. Interpretation of CRP requires that consideration be given to the method, reference values, and units (milligrams per deciliter or milligram per liter) for the clinical laboratory that is being used.

CONCLUSION

Confirmation of inflammation should be guided by clinical judgment based on underlying diagnosis or condition, clinical signs, or CRP.

Sarcopenia predicts postoperative complications and survival in colorectal cancer patients with GLIM-defined malnutrition: Analysis from a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether sarcopenia could predict postoperative outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer with Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM)-defined malnutrition.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer were prospectively collected. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by the combination of low handgrip strength and low muscle quantity or quality as measured by abdominal computed tomography (CT) images. Logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors for postoperative complications and survival, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients with colorectal cancer with GLIM-defined malnutrition were included, of which 145 (46.77%) were identified with sarcopenia. Malnutritional patients with sarcopenia had significantly higher incidences of total complications (34.5% versus 15.8%), severe complications (9.7% versus 1.8%), longer lengths of postoperative hospital stay (median, 14 days versus 12 days), and more costs (median, 56,257 RMB versus 49,024 RMB) than those without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was an independent predictive factor for postoperative complications (OR 2.531, 95% CI 1.451-4.415), overall survival (HR 1.519, 95% CI 1.026-2.248), and disease-free survival (HR 1.847, 95% CI 1.324-2.576). Patients with severe sarcopenia had a higher incidence of severe complications but not total complications or survival than those with not-severe sarcopenia. Moreover, the predictive value of sarcopenia for postoperative complications was attributed to muscle strength and quality but not muscle quantity.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia predicts postoperative complications and survival in patients with colorectal cancer with GLIM-defined malnutrition. Preoperative assessment of sarcopenia is still necessary when nutritional assessment has been well performed.

Association between a novel nutrition-inflammation prognostic grading system and overall survival in hospitalized adults with cancer: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition and increased systemic inflammatory responses are highly prevalent in patients with cancer and they have a negative effect on prognosis. We aimed to develop a nutrition-inflammation prognostic grading system (NIPGS) for patients with cancer, which incorporates the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study totally included 6891 patients diagnosed with cancer. A 4 × 4 matrix incorporating the four NRS 2002 categories within each of the four CRP categories was constructed. Groups with approximate hazard ratios (HRs) were clustered into one grade. The NIPGS consists of four grades, with the survival rate gradually decreasing from Grades 1 to 4. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and comprehensive survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 18.70 months, 2818 death cases occurred. Kaplan-Meier curve showed the survival rate decreased from Grades 1 to 4 of NIPGS (P < 0.001). The NIPGS was an independent risk factor associated with OS adjusting for confounders, with HRs increasing from 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.36; P < 0.001) in Grade 2, 1.58 (95% CI, 1.39-1.80; P < 0.001) in Grade 3 to 1.92 (95% CI, 1.73-2.13; P < 0.001) in Grade 4. A high NIPGS grade was also associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality, poor quality of life, and longer hospital stay and expenses. Two internal validation cohorts confirmed the results of our study.

CONCLUSION

The NIPGS could be an effective prognostic tool for patients with cancer.

Improving the assessment of malnutrition in cancer: Using systemic inflammation markers as a supplement to the inflammation items of the GLIM criteria

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Systemic inflammation is a key pathogenic criterion for diagnosing malnutrition using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Although cancer is commonly considered as a chronic inflammation-related disease, the inflammatory burden may vary depending on the type and stage of cancer. Therefore, a more precise definition of inflammation criteria could facilitate the identification of malnutrition in cancer.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study included 1683 cancer patients screened via NRS2002 for malnutrition risk. The inflammatory burden index (IBI), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and albumin (ALB) level were used to assess the inflammatory burden. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between the GLIM criteria and overall survival. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was used to compare the discriminative performance of the original, IBI-based, CRP-based, NLR-based, and ALB-based GLIM criteria for survival. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between GLIM criteria and short-term outcomes, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

Compared to the original GLIM criteria, the IBI/CRP/NLR/ALB-based GLIM criteria better predicted the long-term outcomes of patients with cancer (chi-square: 1.316 vs. 78.321 vs. 74.740 vs. 88.719 vs. 100.921). The C-index revealed that the inflammation marker-based GLIM criteria showed significantly better prognostic accuracy than the original GLIM criteria. The ALB-based GLIM criteria exhibited the best prognostic accuracy. The inflammation marker-based GLIM criteria were independent predictive factors for the long-term prognosis of cancer. Patients with malnutrition had a 45% higher risk of adverse long-term prognoses than those without malnutrition. The inflammation marker-based GLIM criteria had good prognostic ability to predict outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months. The stepwise effect of the grading of severity via the IBI-based GLIM criteria and CRP-based GLIM criteria was notable. The inflammation marker-based GLIM criteria are useful for predicting short-term outcomes, length of hospitalization, and hospitalization costs.

CONCLUSION

The inflammation marker-based GLIM criteria have a stronger predictive value than the original GLIM criteria in evaluating both the short- and long-term prognoses of cancer patients. It is recommended to use the inflammation marker-based GLIM criteria for nutritional evaluation of cancer patients.

Current research trends, hotspots, and frontiers of medical nutrition therapy on cancer: a bibliometric analysis

Background

There is a high prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients, which seriously affects the anti-cancer therapy effect and outcomes, causing a huge disease burden worldwide. Appropriate nutritional support is important for cancer prevention and control. The aim of this study was to explore the development trends, hotspots, and frontiers of Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) on Cancer from a bibliometric perspective, and provide new insights for future research and clinic practices.

Methods

The global literature of MNT on Cancer published between 1975 and 2022 were searched in the Web of Science Core Collection Database (WOSCC). After refining the data, descriptive analysis and data visualization were performed with bibliometric tools (CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R package "bibliometrix").

Results

A total of 10,339 documents with a timespan from 1982 to 2022 were included in this study. The number of documents had increased continuously over the past 40 years, especially with a steep rise from 2016 to 2022. The majority of scientific production outputs were from the United States, which had the most core research institutions and authors. The published documents could be clustered into three themes respectively labeled by terms "double-blind", "cancer" and "quality-of-life". "gastric cancer", "outcome", "inflammation", "sarcopenia" and "exercise" were the most prominent keywords in recent years. "breast-cancer", "colorectal-cancer", "expression", "risk", "in-vitro", "quality-of-life", "cancer" and "life" might represent the newly emerged topics.

Conclusions

There were a good research foundation and reasonable disciplinary structure in the field of medical nutrition therapy for cancer at present. The core research team was mainly located in the United States, England, and other developed countries. According to the current trends in publications, more articles shall be published in the future. Nutritional metabolism, malnutrition risk, and the impact of nutritional therapy on prognosis might be research hotspots. In particular, it was important to focus on specific cancer, such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer, which might be the frontiers.