Role of MUC1 and MUC5AC expressions as prognostic indicators in gastric carcinomas

The Role of Mucin Expression in the Diagnosis of Oesophago-Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

Survival in oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC) is poor due to early diagnostic challenges. Non-invasive risk stratification may identify susceptible patients with pre-malignant or benign disease. Following diagnostic confirmation with endoscopic biopsy, early OGC may be treated sooner. Mucins are transmembrane glycoproteins implicated in OGC with potential use as biomarkers of malignant transformation. This systematic review defines the role of mucins in OGC diagnosis. A literature search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed following PRISMA protocols for studies published January 1960-December 2022. Demographic data and data on mucin sampling and analysis methods were extracted. The review included 124 studies (n = 11,386 patients). Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAc) was the commonest OG malignancy (n = 101) followed by oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAc, n = 24) and squamous cell carcinoma (OSqCc, n = 10). Mucins MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6 were the most frequently implicated. High MUC1 expression correlated with poorer prognosis and metastases in OSqCc. MUC2 expression decreases during progression from healthy mucosa to OAc, causing reduced protection from gastric acid. MUC5AC was upregulated, and MUC6 downregulated in GAc. Mucin expression varies in OGC; changes may be epigenetic or mutational. Profiling upper GI mucin expression in OGC, with pre-malignant, benign and healthy controls may identify potential early diagnostic biomarkers.

Mucin-microbiome signatures shape the tumor microenvironment in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to identify mucin-microbiome signatures shaping the tumor microenvironment in gastric adenocarcinomas and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We performed high-throughput profiling of the mucin phenotypes present in 108 gastric adenocarcinomas and 20 functional dyspepsia cases using validated mucin-based RT-qPCRs with subsequent immunohistochemistry validation and correlated the data with clinical outcome parameters. The gastric microbiota was assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, taxonomy, and community composition determined, microbial networks analyzed, and the metagenome inferred in association with mucin phenotypes and expression.

RESULTS

Gastric adenocarcinomas with an intestinal mucin environment or high-level MUC13 expression are associated with poor survival. On the contrary, gastric MUC5AC or MUC6 abundance was associated with a more favorable outcome. The oral taxa Neisseria, Prevotella, and Veillonella had centralities in tumors with intestinal and mixed phenotypes and were associated with MUC13 overexpression, highlighting their role as potential drivers in MUC13 signaling in GC. Furthermore, dense bacterial networks were observed in intestinal and mixed mucin phenotype tumors whereas the lowest community complexity was shown in null mucin phenotype tumors due to higher Helicobacter abundance resulting in a more decreased diversity. Enrichment of oral or intestinal microbes was mucin phenotype dependent. More specifically, intestinal mucin phenotype tumors favored the establishment of pro-inflammatory oral taxa forming strong co-occurrence networks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize key roles for mucins in gastric cancer prognosis and shaping microbial networks in the tumor microenvironment. Specifically, the enriched oral taxa associated with aberrant MUC13 expression can be potential biomarkers in predicting disease outcomes. Video Abstract.

[Mucins expression in gastric cancer: connection of MUC status with clinical, morphological and prognostic characteristics of the tumor]

OBJECTIVE

Clarification of the prognostic value and relationship of MUC-phenotypes of gastric cancer with clinical and morphological parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Surgical material from 310 patients with a verified diagnosis of gastric cancer was studied. Samples were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to MUC2, CD10, MUC5AC. The results were compared with clinical and morphological characteristics of gastric cancer and patient survival data.

RESULTS

The MUC-null and MUC-mix groups significantly differ in the prevalence of subtotal/total tumors from the MUC-I group (p=0.022 and p=0.007, respectively), where there are significantly fewer such tumors. Tubular tumors were more common in the MUC-null group compared to the MUC-G (p=0.026) and MUC-mix (p=0.006) groups, and there were fewer cases with the presence of "signet-ring" cells in the MUC-null group (p=0.000). When studying the discohesive histological type, the literature data on smaller tumor sizes and a lower frequency of lymph node metastasis for MUC-G status were not confirmed, but a more frequent proximal localization of MUC-I tumors was found (p=0.003). No statistically significant differences in survival were found in the analysis of the total sample. Differences in survival were found only in discohesive cancers, where the best survival was recorded for the MUC-null group, and the worst for the MUC-mix group (p=0.022). MUC status is not an independent predictor of gastric cancer (HR=1.662, p=0.093).

CONCLUSION

Between tumors with different MUC statuses, there were differences in localization and belonging to individual histological types. Significant differences in survival were found only for discohesive cancers with MUC-null and MUC-mix statuses. Separation of gastric cancers according to MUC status may have only limited predictive value in selected histological forms of cancer.

MUC1 Expressions and Its Prognostic Values in US Gastric Cancer Patients

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of MUC expression in US GC patients. A total of 70 tumor specimens were collected from GC patients who underwent surgery or endoscopic resection between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary referral center in the US. MUC expression status including MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. The positive rates of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 were 71.4%, 78.6%, 74.3%, and 33.3%, respectively. Patients with positive MUC1 expression had a significantly higher rate of aggressive pathologic features including diffuse-type cancer (42.0% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), advanced GC (80.0% vs. 30.0%, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (62.0% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.001), and distant metastasis (32.0% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.017) compared with those with negative MUC1 expression. However, the differences in the pathologic features were not observed according to MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 expression status. In early gastric cancer (EGC), patients with a high level of MUC1 expression showed a higher rate of lymphovascular invasion (71.4% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.026) and EGC meeting non-curative resection (85.7% vs. 42.9%; p = 0.061) than those with negative MUC1. In US GC patients, MUC1 expression is associated with aggressive pathological features, and might be a useful prognostic marker.

Clinicopathological characteristics of mucin phenotype and its relation to the malignant potential in early differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma

Objectives

Mucin phenotype is a tool to classify gastric cancer, but the relationship between mucin phenotype and its malignancy is still controversial. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between mucin phenotype and the malignant potential of gastric cancer.

Methods

A total of 82 cases of early-stage differentiated adenocarcinoma (submucosal invasion cases) obtained from surgeries were studied by immunohistochemistry. Gastric mucin phenotype and E-cadherin expression were analyzed in the mucosal and submucosal layer. E-cadherin expression was analyzed by using imaging software (ImageJ) for objective data analysis. Furthermore, the mucin phenotypic shift was analyzed from mucosa to submucosa.

Results

We found that: (1) tumors with intestinal mucin phenotype had statistically more venous invasion in the submucosal lesion; (2) tumors with an intestinal phenotype that showed venous invasion in the submucosal lesion had a higher percentage of tumors that showed loss of phenotype; (3) no dominant change in E-cadherin expression was observed from the mucosa to submucosa.

Conclusion

Tumors with loss of phenotype and submucosal intestinal phenotype showed predominantly more venous invasion, so examining the identification of phenotypes and phenotype shifts can be expected to be a factor that influences treatment strategies after endoscopic treatment or after surgical resection.

The expression of gastrointestinal differentiation markers in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathological significance based on tumor location

The expression of gastrointestinal differentiation markers is associated with the tumorigenesis and prognosis of digestive cancers. However, little is known about the significance of gastrointestinal differentiation marker profiles in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which is classified as perihilar and distal CCA. The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of gastrointestinal differentiation marker expression in extrahepatic CCA based on tumor location. We examined the expression of gastrointestinal differentiation markers in resected perihilar (n = 30) and distal (n = 54) CCAs based on the immunohistochemical expression of the following markers: MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CD10, CDX-2, and cytokeratin 20. Expression scores were determined semiquantitatively based on the rate of positively stained cells. Furthermore, we performed hierarchical clustering of the CCAs based on the immunohistochemical expression scores to evaluate differences in the expression patterns of the 6 gastrointestinal differentiation markers. Consequently, perihilar and distal CCAs were stratified into 2 subgroups each. Among the perihilar CCAs, subgroup 1 was characterized by lower expression of MUC5AC and MUC6, a larger median tumor size, and a significantly worse prognosis compared with subgroup 2. Furthermore, the immunohistological subgroup (subgroup 1 versus 2) and TNM stage (stage III versus II) were independent predictors of patient survival. Among the distal CCAs, subgroup 1 was characterized by lower expression of MUC5AC compared with subgroup 2. We suggest that gastrointestinal differentiation marker profiles are useful for stratifying perihilar and distal CCAs. In addition, gastrointestinal differentiation markers play a crucial role in tumor development, particularly in perihilar CCA.

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of MUC1 expression in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence supports the overexpression of mucin 1 (MUC1) in colorectal cancer (CRC), but the value of elevated MUC1 expression remains controversial. Here, we evaluated the prognostic and clinicopathological value of MUC1 expression in CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang databases, as well as the China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for studies on MUC1 expression and prognosis of CRC through July 20, 2018. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological value of MUC1 expression in CRC. The Revman version 5.3 package and STATA, version 12 were employed for pooled analysis and analysis of publication bias.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 16 published studies. The combined analysis showed that CRC patients with high MUC1 expression had a worse clinical outcome in overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.30-1.75, P <.00001). In addition, high MUC1 expression was associated with higher TNM stage (RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.17-1.77, P = .0007), greater depth of invasion (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.10-1.53, P = .002), and lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.20-1.80, P = .0002) of CRC. However, the elevated MUC1 expression was not related to disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival (DFS/RFS) (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.78-2.89, P = .22), histological grade (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.96-1.38, P = .12), gender (RR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.83-1.08, P = .44), tumor size (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.85-1.44, P = .44), tumor site (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88-1.16, P = .84), or mucinous component (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.60-1.14, P = .24) in CRC.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that high MUC1 expression represents a marker of poor prognosis in CRC. Meanwhile, elevated MUC1 expression was associated with advanced TNM stage, greater depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis.

Ramifications of secreted mucin MUC5AC in malignant journey: a holistic view

Heavily glycosylated secreted mucin MUC5AC, by the virtue of its cysteine-rich repeats, can form inter- and intramolecular disulfide linkages resulting in complex polymers, which in turn craft the framework of the polymeric mucus gel on epithelial cell surfaces. MUC5AC is a molecule with versatile functional implications including barrier functions to epithelial cells, host-pathogen interaction, immune cell attraction to sites of premalignant or malignant lesions and tumor progression in a context-dependent manner. Differential expression, glycosylation and localization of MUC5AC have been associated with a plethora of benign and malignant pathologies. In this era of robust technologies, overexpression strategies and genetically engineered mouse models, MUC5AC is emerging as a potential diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic target for various malignancies. Considering the clinical relevance of MUC5AC, this review holistically encompasses its genomic organization, domain structure, glycosylation patterns, regulation, functional and molecular connotation from benign to malignant pathologies. Furthermore, we have here explored the incipient and significant experimental tools that are being developed to study this structurally complex and evolutionary conserved gel-forming mucin.

Differential expression of two genes Oct-4 and MUC5AC associates with poor outcome in patients with gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the most frequent leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide that is linked to poor prognosis due to the lack of appropriate biomarkers. Our aim was to evaluate the MUC5AC and Oct-4 expression levels in GC and to assess their association with clinical factors. Immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) and qRT-PCR were performed in GC patients to examine the MUC5AC and Oct-4 expression levels. The mRNA level of MUC5AC was significantly decreased in tumour tissues compared with non-cancerous tissues (1.11 ± 0.69 vs 3.7 ± 0.71; P = .024). On the other hand, Oct-4 mRNA level was upregulated in tumour tissues as compared to normal tissues (2. 86 ± 0.78 vs 0.87 ± 0.54; P = .0015). Decreased expression of MUC5AC was detected in 27 patients (67.5%), while high to moderate expression levels were observed in 13 cases (32.5%), but in normal tissues the expression levels of MUC5AC were increased (P = .001). The decreased expression of MUC5AC was associated with aggressive tumour characteristics, such as TNM stage (P = .023), histologic type (P = .012) and lymph node metastasis (P = .001). High expression of Oct-4 was detected in 24 tumour tissues (60%), while 16 cases (40%) showed low expression level. Increased Oct-4 expression was correlated with clinicopathological characteristics such TNM stage (P = .002), histologic type (P = .008) and lymph node metastasis (P = .001). Our results showed that high Oct-4 expression and the reduction of MUC5AC expression may be involved in the progression and an unfavorable prognosis of GC.

MUC1 Immunohistochemical Expression as a Prognostic Factor in Gastric Cancer: Meta-Analysis

MUC1, a member of the mucin family, is expressed in tumors of various human organs and may function as an antiadhesion molecule that inhibits cell-to-cell adhesion, inducing tumor metastasis, and served as a potential biomarker of tumor progression in early gastric cancer. However, its prognostic significance in gastric cancer is still in dispute. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between MUC1 expression and prognosis of gastric cancer. A total of ten eligible studies with 834 cases and 548 controls were included. MUC1 positive cases were highly positive in intestinal-type carcinomas (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.27–2.44, P = 0.0008 fixed-effect), higher rate of vascular invasion (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13–2.39, P = 0.009 fixed-effect), and lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.20–3.67, P = 0.01 random-effect), as well as lower 5-year survival rate (HR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11–0.66, P = 0.004 random-effect). However, the presence of MUC1 was not associated with gender, tumor size, histologic differentiation, and clinical stage. In summary, MUC1 is a prognostic factor in gastric cancer, which acts as a marker of poor outcome in patients with gastric cancer. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm the role of MUC1 in clinical practice.

Hyper Expression of Mucin 5ac Indicates Poor Cancer Prognoses: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of the study was to explore the association between mucin 5ac expression and cancer prognosis. A systematically comprehensive search was performed through PubMed, the Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The prognostic value of mucin 5ac expression in cancer patients was evaluated. The overexpression of mucin 5ac was found to be significantly associated with a poor prognosis in cancer patients (pooled HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 1.158-2.028, P = 0.003). This association was also detected in a biliary subgroup (pooled HR: 1.83, 95%CI: 1.269-2.639, P = 0.001) and a gastrointestinal subgroup (pooled HR: 1.44, 95%CI: 1.069-1.949 P = 0.017). In the geography subgroup analysis, a statistical association was found in the Asian subgroup (pooled HR: 1.69, 95%CI: 1.200-2.384, P = 0.003). In the clinical characteristics analysis, a statistical association was found between the hyper expression of mucin 5ac and lymphatic metastasis. We indicated that mucin 5ac is a promising prognostic predictor for cancer, especially for biliary and gastrointestinal cancer, and is more suitable for predicting cancer prognoses in Asians.

Identification of PAM4 (clivatuzumab)-reactive epitope on MUC5AC: a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer

PAM4 is a monoclonal antibody showing high specificity for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Humanized PAM4 labeled with ⁹⁰Y in combination with low-dose gemcitabine has shown promising therapeutic activity, and is being evaluated in a phase III clinical trial. Prior efforts have suggested that PAM4 potentially reacts with MUC5AC, a secretory mucin expressed de novo in early pancreatic neoplasia and retained throughout disease progression. In present study, we provide further evidence validating MUC5AC as the PAM4 antigen, and locate PAM4-reactive epitope within the N-terminal cysteine-rich subdomain 2 (Cys2), thus differentiating PAM4 from most anti-MUC5AC antibodies known to-date. Specifically, we show (i) PAM4-antigen and MUC5AC were co-localized in multiple human cancer cell lines, including Capan-1, BxPC-3, and CFPAC-1; (ii) MUC5AC-specific siRNA prominently reduced the expression of both MUC5AC and PAM4-antigen in CFPAC-1 cells; (iii) PAM4 preferentially binds to the void-volume fractions from Sepharose-CL2B chromatography of Capan-1 culture supernatants, which were revealed by Western blot to display the ladder pattern characteristic of oligomeric MUC5AC; and (iv) the N-terminal Cys2 within several recombinant MUC5AC fragments is essential for binding to PAM4. These findings shed light on the mechanism of PAM4-based diagnosis and treatment for pancreatic cancer, and guide further exploration of its clinical utility.

Prognostic Significance of Mucin Antigen MUC1 in Various Human Epithelial Cancers: A Meta-Analysis

Accumulating evidence indicates that mucin antigen MUC1 plays a fundamental role in the initiation and progression of several types of epithelial carcinomas. However, whether the expression of MUC1 on tumor cells is associated with patients' survival remains controversial. Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, and Grey literature were searched up to 15 August 2015 for eligible studies of the association between the MUC1 expression and overall survival (OS) in various epithelial cancers. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated from the included studies. Moreover, the odds ratio (OR) was also extracted to evaluate the association between the clinicopathological parameters of participants and MUC1 expression. A total of 3425 patients covering 23 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled results showed that positive MUC1 staining was a negative predictor of OS (HRFEM = 1.98,95% CIFEM: 1.76-2.22, PFEM = 0.479; HRREM = 2.16,95% CIREM: 1.58-2.94, PREM = 0.355) in various epithelial carcinomas. Subgroup analysis revealed that the increased MUC1 expression was significantly associated with poor OS in patients with gastric cancer (HRFEM = 2.12, 95%CIFEM: 1.75-2.57, PFEM = 0.359; HRREM = 1.89, 95% CIREM: 1.05-3.41, PREM = 0.238), colorectal cancer (HRFEM = 1.73, 95%CIFEM: 1.41-2.13, PFEM = 0.048; HRREM = 2.00,95% CIREM: 1.46-2.73, PREM = 0.019), cholangiocarcinoma (HRFEM = 2.52, 95% CIFEM: 1.42-4.49, PFEM = 0.252; HRREM = 2.34, 95% CIREM: 1.30-4.22, PREM = 0.244), and nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HRFEM = 2.14, 95% CIFEM: 1.46-3.14, PFEM = 0.591; HRREM = 2.81, 95% CIREM: 1.40-5.64, PREM = 0.280). In addition, MUC1 overexpression was more likely to be found in colorectal cancer patients with an advanced tumor node metastasis stage (ORREM = 1.55, 95% CIREM: 1.06-2.27; PREM = 0.187) and in gastric cancer patients with positive lymph node metastasis (ORREM = 2.37, 95% CIREM: 1.19-4.73; PREM = 0.004) and intestinal-type classification (ORREM = 2.34, 95% CIREM: 1.59-3.45; PREM = 0.767). Our findings provide evidence that MUC1 detection has a prognostic value in patients with epithelial-originated cancers, especially in NSCLC and gastrointestinal cancers.

Prognostic value of Muc5AC in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To assess the correlation between decreased Muc5AC expression and patients’ survival and clinicopathological characteristics by conducting a meta-analysis.

METHODS: Literature searches were performed in PubMed and EMBASE, and 11 studies met our criteria. Summary hazard ratios or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the effect. For the pooled analysis of the correlation between decreased Muc5AC expression and clinicopathological characteristics (tumour invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, tumour-node-metastasis stage, tumour size, venous invasion and lymphatic invasion), ORs and their variance were combined to estimate the effect.

RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies comprising 2135 patients were included to assess the association between Muc5AC expression and overall survival and/or clinicopathological characteristics. Decreased Muc5AC expression was significantly correlated with poor overall survival of gastric cancer patients (pooled HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.08-1.7). Moreover, decreased Muc5AC expression was also significantly associated with tumour invasion depth (pooled OR = 2.12, 95%CI: 1.56-2.87) and lymph node metastasis (pooled OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.00-2.44) in gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION: Decreased Muc5AC expression might be a poor prognostic predictor for gastric cancer.

Immunohistochemical Expressions of MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 in Normal, Helicobacter pylori Infected and Metaplastic Gastric Mucosa of Children and Adolescents

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate expression of gastric mucins in children and adolescents and to assess their relations with age and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS

Gastric biopsies were collected from 259 pediatric and adulthood patients with gastrointestinal symptoms among all of patients undergone gastroduodenoscopy from 1990 to 2004 at Gyeongsang National University hospital and assorted based on H. pylori infection, age, and intestinal metaplasia as follows; H. pylori infection before 5 years of age or not, H. pylori infection between 5 and 9 years of age or not, H. pylori infection between 10 and 14 years of age or not, H. pylori infection between 20 and 29 years of age or not and intestinal metaplasia between 21 and 35 years of age. Total 810 tissue slides from the subjects were examined regarding expressions of Mucin2 (MUC2), Mucin5AC (MUC5AC), and Mucin6 (MUC6) in nine groups using immunohistochemical stains. A semiquantitative approach was used to score the staining extent of tissue slide.

RESULTS

Increased expressions of MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 were noted in intestinal metaplasia compared with subjects infected with H. pylori between 20 and 29 years. Gastric expressions of MUC5AC were decreased in older than 5 years with H. pylori compared with in older than 5 years without H. pylori (p < .001). Expressions of MUC2 and MUC6 did not change significantly by H. pylori status. Some nuclear expressions of MUC2 and MUC6 were noted in children without intestinal metaplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

MUC5AC might be affected by chronic H. pylori infection. In addition to biomarkers for intestinal metaplasia or prognostic factors for gastric cancer in adults, MUC2 and MUC6 in children might have an another role, based on ectopic gastric nuclear expressions of MUC2 and MUC6 in children without intestinal metaplasia.

MUC5AC upstream complex repetitive region length polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility and clinical stage of gastric cancer

MUC5AC was deemed to be involved in gastric carcinogenesis since aberrant MUC5AC expression has been repeatedly detected in patients with gastric cancer (GC). In this study, length polymorphisms in a complicated repetitive region adjacent to MUC5AC promoter were assessed in 230 patients with GC and 328 cancer-free controls. Alleles of 1.4 and 1.8 kb were significantly more prevalent in GC group than in controls. In contrast, 2.3 and 2.8 kb alleles occurred at significantly lower frequencies in patients than in controls. Alleles were then classified into susceptible (S; 1.4 and 1.8 kb), protective (P; 2.3 and 2.8 kb) and null (N; all other alleles) categories with respect to their linkage with the susceptibility to GC. Individuals with genotype SS had a 2.7-fold increased risk of GC occurrence, but PN genotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk of this cancer. Moreover, homozygous or heterozygous individuals with one or two copies of 1.4 kb allele showed an earlier age of onset and more advanced metastasis stage compared with patients without this allele (Bonferroni corrected p = 1.35×10⁻⁴ and 6.60×10⁻⁴ accordingly), whereas homozygous patients with two copies of 1.8 kb allele were linked to less advanced GC TNM stage. Our results suggest that certain genetic variations in MUC5AC upstream repetitive region are associated with the susceptibility and progression of GC.

Mucin 1 gene (MUC1) and gastric-cancer susceptibility

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the major malignant diseases worldwide, especially in Asia. It is classified into intestinal and diffuse types. While the intestinal-type GC (IGC) is almost certainly caused by Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, its role in the diffuse-type GC (DGC) appears limited. Recently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on Japanese and Chinese populations identified chromosome 1q22 as a GC susceptibility locus which harbors mucin 1 gene (MUC1) encoding a cell membrane-bound mucin protein. MUC1 has been known as an oncogene with an anti-apoptotic function in cancer cells; however, in normal gastric mucosa, it is anticipated that the mucin 1 protein has a role in protecting gastric epithelial cells from a variety of external insults which cause inflammation and carcinogenesis. HP infection is the most definite insult leading to GC, and a protective function of mucin 1 protein has been suggested by studies on Muc1 knocked-out mice.

Mucin expression in gastric cancer: reappraisal of its clinicopathologic and prognostic significance

CONTEXT

The clinical validity of mucin expression in gastric cancer is debated. Whereas several reports demonstrate a correlation between mucin expression and prognosis, others deny such an association.

OBJECTIVES

This survival analysis study aims to elucidate the prognostic significance of mucin expression in gastric cancer.

DESIGN

A retrospective survival analysis was done with 412 cases of gastric cancer characterized on the basis of MUC immunohistochemistry using MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and CD10 antibodies; the cases were divided into those with a gastric, an intestinal, or a null mucin phenotype based on the predominant mucin.

RESULTS

There was no association between mucin expression and survival when considering overall gastric cancers or the advanced gastric cancer subtype. However, early gastric cancers with a gastric mucin phenotype showed longer survival than those with an intestinal mucin phenotype (P = .01) or a null phenotype (P = .01). In particular, MUC5AC-positive early gastric cancers resulted in longer survival than did those that did not express MUC5AC (P = .009). The loss of MUC5AC expression was identified as an independent, poor prognostic factor in early gastric cancers using the Cox regression proportional hazard model (hazard ratio, 3.50; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

MUC5AC expression is significantly associated with patient survival and can be used to predict outcomes in the gastric cancers, especially in the early gastric cancers.

Decreased Muc5AC expression is associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer

Mucins reportedly play numerous key roles in carcinogenesis, including in tumor invasion, regulation of differentiation and tumor cell proliferation. We investigated the effect of Muc5AC, a secreted mucin, on the invasiveness/migratory capability of gastric cancer cells and the prognostic significance of Muc5AC in gastric cancer patients. The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of Muc5AC expression was validated using immunohistochemical analysis in 412 gastric cancer patients. Differential gene expression was investigated using complementary DNA microarray analysis of 48 fresh tumor tissue samples. Silencing of Muc5AC by using a small hairpin RNA-containing lentivirus increased the invasion and migration of SNU216 and AGS cells as well as Akt phosphorylation and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-7, which were blocked by inhibitors of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Loss of Muc5AC expression was significantly associated with tumor progression (advanced T stage; p = 0.004), lymph node metastases (p = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.0001), and increased tumor size (p = 0.027). Lower MUC5AC expression was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in diffuse-type gastric cancer by using the Cox regression proportional hazard model (hazard ratio, 2.39; p = 0.043). Complementary DNA microarray analysis revealed 86 differentially expressed genes, including genes related to metastasis and invasion, in gastric cancer tissues with high (≥25%) and low (<25%) Muc5AC expression levels. Low Muc5AC expression increased the invasion and migration of gastric cancer cells and could be a useful biomarker of poor prognosis in gastric cancer.

Genetic factors related to gastric cancer susceptibility identified using a genome-wide association study

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the major malignant diseases worldwide, especially in Asia, where Japan and Korea have the highest incidence in the world. Gastric cancer is classified into intestinal and diffuse types. While the former is almost absolutely caused by Helicobacter pylori infection as the initial insult, the latter seems to include cases in which the role of infection is limited, if any, and a contribution of genetic factors is anticipated. Previously, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on diffuse-type GC by using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) catalogued for Japanese population (JSNP), and identified a prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) gene encoding a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored cell surface antigen as a GC susceptibility gene. From the second candidate locus identified using the GWAS, 1q22, we found the Mucin 1 (MUC1) gene encoding a cell membrane-bound mucin protein as another gene related to diffuse-type GC. A two-allele analysis based on risk genotypes of the two genes revealed approximately 95% of Japanese population have at least one of the two risk genotypes, and approximately 56% of the population have both risk genotypes. The two-SNP genotype might offer ample room to further stratify a high GC risk subpopulation in Japan and Asia by adding another genetic and/or non-genetic factor. Recently, a GWAS on the Chinese population disclosed an additional three GC susceptibility loci: 3q13.31, 5p13.1 and 10q23.

The membrane-bound mucins: From cell signalling to transcriptional regulation and expression in epithelial cancers

The membrane-bound mucins belong to an ever-increasing family of O-glycoproteins. Based on their structure and localization at the cell surface they are thought to play important biological roles in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, in cell signalling and in modulating biological properties of cancer cells. Among them, MUC1 and MUC4 mucins are best characterized. Their altered expression in cancer (overexpression in the respiratory, gastro-intestinal, urogenital and hepato-biliary tracts) indicates an important role for these membrane-bound mucins in tumour progression, metastasis, cancer cell resistance to chemotherapeutics drugs and as specific markers of epithelial cancer cells. Some mechanisms responsible for MUC1 and MUC4 role in tumour cell properties have been deciphered recently. However, much remains to be done in order to understand the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways that control the expression of membrane-bound mucins during the different steps of tumour progression toward adenocarcinoma and evaluate their potential as prognostic/diagnostic markers and as therapeutic tools. In this review we focus on the molecular mechanisms and signalling pathways known to control the expression of membrane-bound mucins in cancer. We will discuss the mechanisms of regulation at the promoter level (including genetic and epigenetic modifications) that may be responsible for the mucin altered pattern of expression in epithelial cancers.

Identification of matrix metalloproteinase 11 as a predictive tumor marker in serum based on gene expression profiling

PURPOSE

Prognostic markers discovery is a strategy for early diagnosis and individualization therapy for human cancer. In this study, we focus to integrate different methods to identify specific biomarker and elucidate its clinical significance.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A powerful tool named Digital Gene Expression Display online was applied to isolate differentially expressed genes correlated with gastric cancer. Matrix metalloproteinase 11 (MMP11) was selected and confirmed at both mRNA and protein level in 10 cell lines, 123 cases of tumor tissues, and 305 cases of gastric cancer serum specimen by semiquantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry staining, and ELISA techniques, respectively.

RESULTS

Our data showed that overexpression of MMP11 at mRNA and protein level was consistently detected in cell lines and primary tumors compared with matched normal tissues. Importantly, serum MMP11 levels were also significantly elevated in gastric cancer patients compared with those of the control subjects (P < 0.001), and the positive expression was well correlated with metastasis in gastric cancer patients (P = 0.009). Furthermore, we have shown that overexpression of MMP11 was associated with the malignant proliferation of AGS cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of gene expression profiling and specific clinical resource is a promising approach to validate gene expression patterns associated with malignant phenotype. As a secreted protein, MMP11 may play an important role in carcinogenesis and has potential implication as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of human cancers including gastric cancer.

Sarco/Endoplasmic Reticulum Calcium-ATPase 2 Expression as a Tumor Marker in Colorectal Cancer

Maintaining a high calcium concentration in the endoplasmic reticulum through the action of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium-ATPases (SERCAs) is crucial in many cell functions involved in intracellular signal transduction, control of proliferation, programmed cell death, or the synthesis of mature proteins. Recent studies have found that many SERCAs have altered expression patterns in various malignancies. The purpose of the current study was to quantify the expression of SERCA2 in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and the corresponding noncancerous tissues, and to statistically analyze whether the SERCA2 expression levels correlate with the clinico-pathologic features and prognosis of CRC patients. Paired colorectal tissue samples from cancerous and the corresponding noncancerous tissues were obtained from 50 patients who underwent surgical resection. Semiquantitative measurements of SERCA2 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression were done using the multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. CRC tissues were analyzed through immunohistochemistry for the SERCA2 protein. SERCA2 mRNA overexpression in cancerous tissues compared with normal counterparts was observed in 45 of 50 (90%) patients. The mean expression level of SERCA2 mRNA in cancerous tissues was significantly higher than that in noncancerous tissues (P = 0.01). Increased SERCA2 protein expression was significantly correlated with serosal invasion (P = 0.012), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.009), and advanced tumor stage (P = 0.004). Furthermore, patients with high SERCA2 expression had a significantly poorer overall survival rate than patients with low SERCA2 (P = 0.032). Multivariate analyses indicated that tumor stage (P = 0.015) and SERCA2 expression were independently correlated with overall survival (P = 0.018). The result of this study indicated that SERCA2 may be a molecular determinant in the development and progression of CRC. The molecular mechanisms underlying the SERCA-dependent calcium accumulation and CRC tumorigenesis are worthy of further investigations.

MUC1 as a target antigen for cancer immunotherapy

The cancer-associated antigen MUC1 is overexpressed and modified by tumor cells in over half of all cancer cases. Despite various complexities associated with this antigen, it is well worth pursuing as a vaccine for the immunotherapy of cancer. In this review, the authors describe the discovery of MUC1 and its association with cancer, recent observations showing that the immunology of MUC1 is complicated, animal data showing that it can be a target for immune-mediated tumor rejection, and finally, preliminary clinical results to show that vaccine-based immunotherapy with MUC1 does have an impact on the therapy of cancer.

Cytotoxicity of PAI2, C595 and Herceptin vectors labeled with the alpha-emitting radioisotope Bismuth-213 for ovarian cancer cell monolayers and clusters

The vectors PAI2, C595 and Herceptin target the membrane-bound uPA, MUC1 and HER2 antigens expressed by cancer cells, respectively. The expression of these receptors was tested in the ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3; MUC-1 was strongly expressed (3+), uPA moderately expressed (2+), but HER2 was negative (-). The alpha-emitting radionuclide Bismuth-213 was chelated with these targeting vectors to form alpha conjugates (ACs), the cytotoxicity of which were tested with OVCAR-3 cells. The PAI2 and C595 ACs are highly cytotoxic to the ovarian monolayer cancer cells and cell clusters in a concentration-dependent fashion and cause morphological changes of treated cancer cells, inducing apoptosis. These ACs are potential candidates for the control of ovarian cancer at the minimum residual disease (MRD) stage.

Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection on mucin expression in gastric carcinoma and pericancerous tissues

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the major causes of human gastric carcinoma and can disturb the gastric mucosa barrier. Mucins have not only lubricating and protecting functions, but are also related to signal transduction, turnover of gastric epithelium and carcinogenesis of gastric mucosa. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between H. pylori infection and aberrant mucin expression in patients with gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

H. pylori infection was diagnosed by the Warthin-Starry staining method. Different kinds of mucins were detected using an immunohistochemical method.

RESULTS

Of 46 patients with gastric carcinoma, there were 26 patients who had H. pylori infection (56.5%). Of 21 pericancerous mucosas from the H. pylori-positive patients, 14 had MUC2 expression (66.7%), seven had strong MUC1 expression (+ + +) (33.7%), seven had strong MUC6 expression (+ + +) (33.3%), and five had strong MUC5AC expression (+ + +) (23.8%). In contrast, only six of 18 H. pylori-negative pericancerous mucosas had MUC2 expression (33.3%) (P < 0.05 compared with H. pylori-positive pericancerous mucosas), 12 had strong MUC1 expression (+ + +) in 16 H. pylori-negative pericancerous mucosas (75%) (P < 0.05), 11 had strong MUC6 expression (+ + +) in 16 H. pylori-negative pericancerous mucosas (68.8%) (P < 0.05), and 10 had strong MUC5AC expression (+ + +) in 14 H. pylori-negative pericancerous mucosas (71.4%) (P < 0.01). Of the H. pylori-positive cancerous tissues, 50% (13/26) had MUC1 expression and 38.5% (10/26) had MUC6 expression. In comparison, of the H. pylori-negative cancerous tissues, 80% (16/20) had MUC1 expression (P < 0.05) and 80% (16/20) had MUC6 expression (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that H. pylori infection can alter the expression of some mucin genes in pericancerous mucosa and cancerous tissues of gastric carcinoma, then destroy the gastric mucosa barrier.

Regulation of mucin expression: mechanistic aspects and implications for cancer and inflammatory diseases

Mucins are large multifunctional glycoproteins whose primary functions are to protect and lubricate the surfaces of epithelial tissues lining ducts and lumens within the human body. Several lines of evidence also support the involvement of mucins in more complex biological processes such as epithelial cell renewal and differentiation, cell signaling, and cell adhesion. Recent studies have uncovered the role of select mucins in the pathogenesis of cancer, underscoring the importance of a detailed knowledge about mucin biology. Under normal physiological conditions, the production of mucins is optimally maintained by a host of elaborate and coordinated regulatory mechanisms, thereby affording a well-defined pattern of tissue-, time-, and developmental state-specific distribution. However, mucin homeostasis may be disrupted by the action of environmental and/or intrinsic factors that affect cellular integrity. This results in an altered cell behavior that often culminates into a variety of pathological conditions. Deregulated mucin production has indeed been associated with numerous types of cancers and inflammatory disorders. It is, therefore, crucial to comprehend the underlying basis of molecular mechanisms controlling mucin production in order to design and implement adequate therapeutic strategies for combating these diseases. Herein, we discuss some physiologically relevant regulatory aspects of mucin production, with a particular emphasis on aberrations that pertain to pathological situations. Our views of the achievements, the conceptual and technical limitations, as well as the future challenges associated with studies of mucin regulation are exposed.

Clinical significance of MUC1 and c-Met RT-PCR detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recently, several reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques have been proven to be useful in the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in cancer patients. We attempted to detect CTCs in patients with gastric cancer (GC) using a RT-PCR assay for c-Met and MUC1 and to evaluate their clinical value.

METHODS

Using a RT-PCR assay, c-Met and MUC1 mRNAs were amplified in 52 GC patients and 36 healthy individuals. Analyses were carried out for their correlation with the patients' clinicopathologic features, the occurrence of new post-operative metastasis, as well as the overall survival rates.

RESULTS

In the RT-PCR analysis of peripheral blood, 61.5% (32/52) and 71.2% (37/52) of GC patients were positive for c-Met and MUC1 mRNA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of either mRNA detected in peripheral blood is 82.7% and 86.1%, respectively, with an accuracy of 84.1%. The detection of c-Met or MUC1 mRNA was significantly correlated with the depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastases, TNM stage, vessel invasion, perineural involvement, and post-operative metastasis (all P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the overall survival rate of patients with positive c-Met or MUC1 mRNA expression in the peripheral blood was significantly shorter than in patients negative for c-Met or MUC1 mRNA expression (both P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that using RT-PCR for the detection of c-Met or MUC1 mRNA may be a promising tool for the early detection of micro-metastatic CTCs in GC patients. Combination of these 2 tumor-specific mRNA markers would increase the detection rate and may be clinically helpful in predicting the outcome in GC patients.

Differential expression of MUC genes in endometrial and cervical tissues and tumors

Background

Mucin glycoprotein's are major components of mucus and are considered an important class of tumor associated antigens. The objective of this study was to investigate the expression of human MUC genes (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5B, MUC5AC and MUC8) in human endometrium and cervix, and to compare and quantitate the expression of MUC genes in normal and cancerous tissues.

Methods

Slot blot techniques were used to study the MUC gene expression and quantitation.

Results

Of the five-mucin genes studied, MUC1, MUC5B and MUC8 showed high expression levels in the normal and cancerous endometrial and cervical tissues, MUC2 and MUC5AC showed considerably lower expression. Statistically, higher levels of MUC1, MUC5B and MUC8 were observed in endometrial adenocarcinomas compared to normal tissues. In contrast, only MUC1 levels increased with no significant changes in expression of MUC5B and MUC8 in cervical tumors over normal cervical tissues.

Conclusion

Endometrial tumors showed increased expression of MUC1, MUC5B and MUC8 over normal tissues. Only MUC1 appears to be increase, in cervical tumors. All the studied tissues showed high and consistent expression of MUC8 mRNA. Low to neglible levels of MUC2 and MUC5AC were observed in all studied endometrial and cervical tissues.