The prognostic significance of margin width for extremity and trunk sarcoma

A Two-Step Approach to the Surgical Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Background: Nowadays, limb-sparing procedures are the gold standard in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas of the limbs. Wide tumor resection with appropriate oncological margins, reconstruction, and stabilization of the involved bone and joint and restoration of the soft tissue lost are essential in order to obtain good clinical and functional outcomes. Tumor excision and soft-tissue reconstruction performed in one-step surgery is chosen by many centers as the preferred approach; however, according to our experience in some selected patients, two-step surgery performed using a dermal regeneration template first and then a margin revision, taking into account the definitive results of the anatomopathological exam conducted over the surgical specimen from the previous surgery, associated with definitive reconstruction surgery over a healthy bed of granulated tissue, showed many potential benefits. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on thirteen patients who underwent a two-step reconstruction procedure using dermal substitution after soft-tissue sarcoma excision. Results: Clinically, the enrolled patients achieved excellent contour and cosmesis of their surgical wounds, with a mean VSS value of 3.07. During the follow-up period, no local recurrences were observed in any patient. Conclusions: Two-step surgery represents the most suitable solution to allow surgical radicality with minimal recurrency and adequate soft-tissue reconstruction, avoiding the possibility of wasting autologous tissue. Our patients generally embraced this approach and the management that followed.

Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Risk Assessment and Multidisciplinary Management

Extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare cancers that arise from mesenchymal tissues. Hence, the adoption of tailored risk assessment and prognostication tools plays a crucial role in optimizing the decision-making for which of the many possible treatment strategies to select. Management of these tumors requires a multidisciplinary strategy, which has seen significant development in recent decades. Surgery has emerged as the primary treatment approach, with the main goal of achieving microscopic negative tumor margins. To reduce the likelihood of local recurrence, loco-regional treatments such as radiation therapy and isolated limb perfusion are often added to the treatment regimen in combination with surgery. This approach also enables surgeons to perform limb-sparing surgery, particularly in cases where a positive tumor margin is expected. Chemotherapy may also provide a further benefit in decreasing the probability of local recurrence or reducing distant metastasis in selected patients. Selecting the optimal treatment strategy for these rare tumors is best accomplished by an experienced multi-disciplinary team.

Surgical Margins in Musculoskeletal Sarcoma

» Negative margin resection of musculoskeletal sarcomas is associated with reduced risk of local recurrence.» There is limited evidence to support an absolute margin width of soft tissue or bone that correlates with reduced risk of local recurrence.» Factors intrinsic to the tumor, including histologic subtype, grade, growth pattern and neurovascular involvement impact margin status and local recurrence, and should be considered when evaluating a patient's individual risk after positive margins.» Appropriate use of adjuvant therapy, critical analysis of preoperative advanced cross-sectional imaging, and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team are essential to obtain negative margins when resecting sarcomas.

Cutaneous leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective review of 45 cases

Primary cutaneous leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare soft tissue tumour type with two subtypes, dermal and subcutaneous. As deeper tumours confer a worse prognosis, they require a more aggressive approach. Conversely, a more conservative surgical approach for dermal LMS has been suggested. Few studies have comprehensively reported both clinical surgical and histological excision margins. Therefore, we sought to provide margin recommendations based on our experience and review of the existing literature. We undertook a retrospective case-note review (1998-2019) of cutaneous LMS management to establish histological/surgical margins using pathology/electronic patient records. The diagnosis was made and classified by an experienced dermatopathologist according to the World Health Organization classification. In the dermal LMS cohort (n = 35), mean peripheral and deep histological margins were 5.4 mm (range 0.5-20) and 5.6 mm (range 0.1-14.5), respectively. The incomplete excision rate was 31% (11 of 35). There were no recurrences. In the subcutaneous LMS cohort (n = 10), mean peripheral and deep histological margins were 5.7 mm (range 0.2-14) and 1.1 mm (range 0.2-1.7), respectively. The incomplete excision rate was 40% (4 of 10). The recurrence rate was 20% (2 of 10) despite achieving histological clearance after 1 year. One lung metastasis occurred 1 year following an adequately excised primary scalp LMS. Thus, for dermal LMS we propose a clinical margin of 5-10 mm (depending on lesion size) at the initial excision or at scar re-excision following involved/close histological peripheral and/or deep margins (i.e. < 1 mm). For subcutaneous LMS, we suggest a clinical margin of 15-20 mm (depending on lesion size) to achieve a peripheral histological clearance of 10 mm and negative deep margin (i.e. > 1 mm), down to the periosteum/fascia/muscle according to anatomical site. If this is not achieved, a re-excision would be recommended. However, prospective studies are needed for optimal guidance.

The prognostic significance of surgical resection margins for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in sarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection with microscopically negative margins constitutes one of the key elements of a curative therapeutic approach for localized sarcomas. However, the prognostic value of quantitative margin width remains controversial. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of margin status and margin width for local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), and overall survival.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 210 patients undergoing resection of localized sarcoma between 1997 and 2018 at a national sarcoma reference center.

RESULTS

Logistic regression did not reveal an effect of metric margin width as a prognostic factor for LR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98, p = 0.574), DR (OR = 1, p = 0.908), or overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-1.20, p = 0.609). Subgroup analysis revealed no differences between complete first resections (R0) and re-resections (re-R0) following unplanned R1-resections for LR (p = 0.727) and overall survival (p = 0.125), but a significantly higher DR-rate in re-R0 cases (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving a negative margin is essential in sarcoma surgery, however, metric margin width was not associated with disease-specific outcomes. Re-resection of unplanned R1-resections should be performed to control for LR and overall survival rates. As re-R0 cases were at significantly higher risk of DR, these patients should be followed up closely in standardized surveillance protocols.

Clinical characteristics of sarcoma patients: a population-based data analysis from a German clinical cancer registry

PURPOSE

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms with a wide range of histological types and occur in almost any anatomic site and side. This study evaluated the prognostic factors in sarcoma patients based on German clinical cancer registry data.

METHODS

The German clinical cancer register of Saxony-Anhalt was used for all data analyses. Sarcoma cases of all clinical or pathological T-stages (T1a-T4c), all N-stages (N0-3) and M-stages (0-1b) corresponding to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages I to IVB were considered. In our analyses, 787 cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2022 were included. Further, we assessed the association of cancer-related parameters with mortality and hazard ratios (HR) from the Cox proportional hazard models. We included sex, age at diagnosis, histological grade, T-, N- and M-stages, tumor size, tumor localization and tumor side as parameters in our regression models.

RESULTS

The majority of sarcoma patients were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma (12%), liposarcoma (11%), angiosarcoma (5.3%) and myxofibrosarcoma (2.7%). In our univariate regression models, tumors localized in more than one location, head, face and neck region as well as the pelvis and lower extremity were associated with increased mortality risk (more than one location: HR 7.10, 95% CI 2.20-22.9; head, face and neck: HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.89-2.06; pelvis: HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.86-1.89; lower extremity: HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.96). Higher histological grades, UICC-grades and TNM-stages were related to a higher mortality risk. Differing histological subtypes had significant influence on overall survival and progression-free survival. Patients diagnosed with fibromyxoid sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and angiosarcoma were related to higher mortality risk compared to other histological subtypes (fibromyxoid sarcoma: HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.71-38.1; rhabdomyosarcoma: HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.44-6.00; angiosarcoma: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.53-2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Histological grade, tumor size, nodal and distant metastasis, tumor localization and histological subtype were determined as prognostic factors in terms of survival.

Local relapse of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall operated on with wide margins without radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The quality of surgical margins is the most important factor affecting local control in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Despite this, there is no universally accepted consensus on the definition of an adequate surgical margin or on which patients should be offered radiation therapy. This study focuses on local control and its prognostic factors in patients with trunk wall and extremity STS.

METHODS

Adult patients with a final diagnosis of trunk wall or extremity STS referred to a single tertiary referral centre between August 1987 and December 2016 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patients were treated according to a protocol instituted in 1987. The classification of surgical margins and indications for radiation therapy were based on anatomy and strict definition of surgical margins as metric distance to the resection border. Local treatment was defined as adequate if patients received either surgery with wide margins alone or marginal surgery combined with radiation therapy. Margins were considered wide if the tumour was excised with pathological margins greater than 2.5 cm or with an uninvolved natural anatomical barrier. After treatment, patients were followed up with local imaging and chest X-ray: 5 years for high-grade STS, 10 years for low-grade STS.

RESULTS

A total of 812 patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.8 (range 0.5-19.5) years. Forty-four patients had a grade 1 tumour: there were no instances of recurrence in this group thus they were excluded from further analysis. Five-year local control in the 768 patients with grade 2-3 STS was 90.1 per cent in patients receiving adequate local treatment according to the protocol. Altogether, 333 patients (43.4 per cent) were treated with wide surgery alone and their 5-year local control rate was 91.1 per cent. Among patients treated with wide surgery alone, deep location was the only factor adversely associated with local relapse risk in multivariable analysis; 5-year local control was 95.3 per cent in superficial and 88.3 per cent in deep-sited sarcomas (hazards ratio 3.154 (95% c.i. 1.265 to 7.860), P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

A high local control rate is achievable with surgery alone for a substantial proportion of patients with STS of the extremities or superficial trunk wall.

The role of patient advocates and sarcoma community initiatives in musculoskeletal oncology. Moving towards Evidence-Based Advocacy to empower Evidence-Based Medicine

Musculoskeletal sarcomas are rare cancers that as the whole family of sarcomas pose several challenges at different levels, ranging from medical knowledge to clinical research and policymaking. Addressing these challenges, necessarily calls for the inclusion of patient perspective inside the decision-making processes of every area that contributes to treatment improvement, from the provision of high-quality services by healthcare organisations to research issues. Without patient-provided inputs to inform decisions, the current paradigm of patient-centred care makes no sense and sounds at the least irrational if not unethical. Putting PROMs on "centre stage" in cancer research and care, could allow to build a truly Evidence Based Advocacy (EBA) and therefore to empower Evidence Based Medicine (EBM).

Bilateral asymmetry of bone density adjacent to pelvic sarcomas: A retrospective study using computed tomography

Limb-salvaging hemipelvectomy surgeries involving allograft or custom prosthesis reconstruction require high quality remaining pelvic bone for adequate device fixation. Modeling studies of custom pelvis prosthesis designs typically mirror contralateral pelvic bone material properties to the ipsilateral pelvis. However, the extent of bone material property and geometric symmetry, and thus the appropriateness of mirroring, remains unknown and should be considered when designing or analyzing the performance of pelvic prostheses. This study investigates preoperative differences between ipsilateral and contralateral pelvic bone for patients with a pelvic sarcoma. Computed tomography (CT) data were obtained retrospectively from eight patients with a pelvic sarcoma. Subject-specific computational models of the pelvic bones were constructed from the CT data. Bilateral asymmetry of bone material properties and cross-sectional areas between the ipsilateral and contralateral hemipelvis were quantified at points adjacent to the pelvic sarcoma. Large bilateral asymmetry (>20%) in trabecular but not cortical bone density was observed within 20 mm of the tumor location. Differences in trabecular bone density typically declined with increased distance from the tumor. The greatest bilateral difference in cross-sectional area occurred within 10 mm of the tumor boundary for three patients and within 40 mm from the tumor site for four patients. Our results suggest that pelvic sarcomas can cause significant bilateral asymmetries in trabecular bone density for patients with a pelvic sarcoma. These differences should be taken into account when designing custom implants for this patient population.

Refractory recurrent spinal chondrosarcoma: What is the role of salvage surgery?

BACKGROUND

The spinal chondrosarcoma has high risk of recurrence if the initial surgery is not performed in an en bloc fashion. It remains technically demanding to surgically manage the refractory recurrent spinal chondrosarcoma (RRSC). This study is to assess the clinical features and investigate the prognostic factors for patients with RRSCs.

METHODS

forty-nine patients with RRSCs underwent salvage surgeries in our institution, and the clinical characteristics were collected and recorded by two independent reviewers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the independent prognostic factors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with RRSCs.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up of 31.7 ± 21.04 months (Range 9-93), the 3-year RFS and OS rate was 24.5% and 34.5%, respectively. According to the Cox proportional hazards regression model, wide excision with tumor-free margin (>4 mm) was associated with both better RFS and OS for patients with RRSCs. Meanwhile, the number of recurrences ≤2 was beneficial to RFS, while high pathological grade was correlated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide excision with tumor-free margin (>4 mm) is recommendable if appropriate in the salvage surgery for patients with RRSCs. Patients with number of recurrences ≤ 2 and lower pathological grade may have better RFS and OS, respectively.

Neoadjuvant radiation for cutaneous and soft tissue angiosarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant radiation (NRT) is frequently utilized in soft tissue sarcomas to increase local control. Its utility in cutaneous and soft tissue angiosarcoma remains poorly defined.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) evaluating patients with clinically localized, surgically resected angiosarcomas. Factors associated with receipt of NRT in the overall cohort and margin positivity in treatment naïve patients were identified by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Of 597 patients, 27 (4.5%) received NRT. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, p = 0.025), tumor size more than or equal to 5 cm (OR 3.16, p = 0.02), and extremity tumor location (OR 3.99, p = 0.04) were associated with receipt of NRT. All patients who received NRT achieved an R0 resection (p = 0.03) compared with 17.9% of patients without NRT. Factors associated with risk of margin positivity included tumor size more than or equal to 5 cm (OR 1.85, p = 0.01), and head/neck location (OR 2.24, p = 0.006). NRT was not significantly associated with improved survival (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

NRT improves rates of R0 resection but is infrequently utilized in cutaneous and soft tissue angiosarcoma. Increased usage of NRT, particularly for patients with lesions more than or equal to 5 cm, or head and neck location, may help achieve complete resections.

Radiomics Analysis of Fat-Saturated T2-Weighted MRI Sequences for the Prediction of Prognosis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities and Trunk Treated With Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy

Purpose

To create a prognostic prediction radiomics model for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and trunk treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

Methods

This study included 62 patients with STS of the extremities and trunk who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before neoadjuvant radiotherapy. After tumour segmentation and preprocessing, 851 radiomics features were extracted. The radiomics score was constructed according to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. Survival analysis (disease-free survival; DFS) was performed using the log-rank test and Cox’s proportional hazards regression model. The nomogram model was established based on the log-rank test and Cox regression model. Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic factors. The clinical utility of the model was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The univariate survival analysis showed that tumour location (p = 0.032), clinical stage (p = 0.022), tumour size (p = 0.005) and the radiomics score were correlated with DFS (p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that tumour location, tumour size, and the radiomics score were independent prognostic factors for DFS (p < 0.05). The combined clinical-radiomics model based on the multivariate analysis showed the best predictive ability for DFS (C-index: 0.781; Area Under Curve: 0.791). DCA revealed that the use of the radiomics score-based nomogram was associated with better benefit gains relative to the prediction of 2-year DFS events than other models in the threshold probability range between 0.12 and 0.38.

Conclusion

The radiomics score from pretreatment MRI is an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients with STS of the extremities and trunk. The radiomics score-based nomogram could improve prognostic stratification ability and thus contribute to individualized therapy for STS patients.

Surgical Margins in Canine Cutaneous Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Dichotomous Classification System Does Not Accurately Predict the Risk of Local Recurrence

Simple Summary

Histological evaluation of surgical margins is crucial for correct prognostication and adjuvant treatment recommendation after excision of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in dogs. Incompletely excised STS have a high risk of local recurrence (LR), while completely excised STS without other negative prognostic factors are generally associated with a good prognosis. However, guidelines are lacking on how to manage STS excised with clean but close margins (CbCM), although some authors advocated their inclusion in the tumor-free margin group. This retrospective study investigates the impact of CbCM on LR of canine STS. Ninety-eight surgical excised canine STS at first presentation were included. Cumulative incidence of LR was estimated for each category of margins (tumor-free, infiltrated, CbCM), and after grouping CbCM alternatively in the tumor-free and infiltrated category. Cumulative incidence of LR at three years differed significantly between the three categories, and it was estimated to be 42% with infiltrated margins, 23% with CbCM, 7% with tumor-free margins. Both when CbCM were grouped with infiltrated margins or with tumor-free margins, the incidence of LR was statistically different. The rate of LR with CbCm was greater than with tumor-free margins. The category CbCM may be considered as a separate prognostic category.

Abstract

Adjuvant treatments are recommended in dogs with incompletely excised cutaneous soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) to reduce the risk of local recurrence (LR), although guidelines are lacking on how to manage clean but close margins (CbCM). This retrospective study investigates the impact of CbCM on LR of canine STS. Ninety-eight surgically excised canine STS at first presentation were included. Tissue samples were routinely trimmed and analyzed. Cumulative incidence of LR was estimated for each category of margins (tumor-free, infiltrated, CbCM), and included CbCM in the tumor-free and infiltrated category, respectively. The prognostic impact on LR was then adjusted for relevant prognostic factors. Cumulative incidence of LR at three years differed significantly between the three categories (p = 0.016), and was estimated to be 42% with infiltrated margins, 23% with CbCM, 7% with tumor-free margins. Both when CbCM were grouped with infiltrated margins (p = 0.033; HR = 5.05), and when CbCM were grouped with tumor-free margins (p = 0.011; HR = 3.13), a significant difference between groups was found. STS excised with infiltrated margins had the greatest risk of LR. The rate of LR with CbCm was greater than recurrence rate of tumor-free margins. The category CbCM may be considered as a separate prognostic category.

Margin Assessment in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Many classifications to assess margins status for soft tissue sarcomas are reported in the literature. Most of the series are heterogeneous and variable in size, making it difficult to compare results from study to study. Thus, which is the best way to assess margins in order to predict the risk of local recurrence is still debated. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Abstract

Adequacy of margins must take into consideration both the resection margin width (quantity) and anatomic barrier (quality). There are several classification schemes for reporting surgical resection margin status for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Most of the studies regarding treatment outcomes in STS included all histologic grades and histological subtypes, which include infiltrative and non-infiltrative subtypes and are very heterogeneous in terms of both histologic characteristics and treatment modalities (adjuvant treatments or not). This lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare results from study to study. Therefore, there is a great need for evidence-based standardization concerning the width of resection margins. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with STS. Patient cases should be discussed at multidisciplinary tumor boards and treatments should be individualized to clinical and demographic characteristics, which must include also a deep knowledge of specific histotypes behaviors, particularly infiltrative ones.

Risk of translocated soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence using perforator propeller flap: Case report and literature review

Tumor seeding after intra-abdominal and head and neck cancer surgery is a well-known entity. The risk of disseminating cancerous cells during surgery is also described for soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities. Nonetheless, after reconstructive surgery using flaps, the risk of recurrence at the donor site is extremely rare. Up to this date, the literature describes only three cases, but none of them reported a translocated recurrence after a reconstruction with a propeller flap. Here, we report a case of high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma of the knee, which recurred at the proximal edge of a propeller flap 28 months after the first excision surgery. The reasons for such local recurrences are not clear and previous works have advocated different theories: direct contamination by tumor cells, physical manipulation of the tumor and creation of surgical wounds with tumor supportive properties. Although these particular cases of recurrence are exceedingly rare, certain precautionary meticulous surgical techniques and a thorough preoperative planning are pivotal to avoid the contamination of "clean" areas during the first excision surgery.

Surgical approach and prognosis of primitive chest wall alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma in an adult: A case report and review of the literature

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (ARMS) are rare entities that occur predominantly on the extremities and represent 20% of rhabdomyosarcomas. Other common locations include the peri-rectal and perineal regions, head and neck, and genitourinary system. To our knowledge, this presentation is the first case of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma of the chest wall reported in the literature. Here, we describe a case of a 64-year-old man with alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas who underwent a chest wall resection. The defect was reconstructed with polypropylene mesh and latissimus dorsi muscle. Our patient did not show recurrence ten months after complete resection. The present paper describes our surgical approach to a case of primary alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma of the chest wall in an adult. The authors discuss the principal judgment criteria for successful surgical resection and prognosis, highlighting the relevance of chest wall reconstruction and their complementary aspects in the multimodal management of this rare entity.

The Effect of Resection Margin on Local Recurrence and Survival in High Grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities: How Far Is Far Enough?

Simple Summary

In soft tissue sarcomas the width of surgical margins after resection determines the extent of surgery and the function after resection. But how far is really necessary? 305 patients with deep-seated, G2/3 soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity, the trunk wall, or the pelvis were reviewed. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 82%. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 66%. Positive (contaminated) margins worsened LRFS and OS. A margin of >10 mm did not improve LRFS and OS as compared to one of >5 mm. A resection margin of <1 mm showed a trend but not significantly better LRFS or OS compared to a contaminated margin. In conclusion the margin should at least be free of tumor, in sound tissue. A margin of >5 mm sound tissue seems to be sufficient. Resecting more tissue does not benefit the patient.

Abstract

Background: The significance of surgical margins after resection of soft tissue sarcomas in respect to local-recurrence-free survival and overall survival is evaluated. Methods: A total of 305 patients with deep-seated, G2/3 soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremity, the trunk wall, or the pelvis were reviewed. The margin was defined according to the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) classification system (R0-2), the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) classification (R + 1 mm) for which a margin <1 mm is included into the R1 group, and in groups of <1 mm, 1–5 mm, >5 mm, or >10 mm. Results: Of these patients, 31 (10.2%) had a contaminated margin, 64 (21%) a margin of <1 mm, 123 (40.3%) a margin of 1–5 mm, 47 (15.4%) a margin of >5 mm, and 40 (13.1%) a margin of >10 mm. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 81.6%. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 65.9%. Positive margins worsened LRFS and OS. A margin of >10 mm did not improve LRFS and OS as compared to one of >5 mm. Conclusions: A resection margin of <1 mm showed a trend but not significantly better LRFS or OS compared to a contaminated margin. This finding supports use of the UICC classification. A margin of more than 10 mm did not improve LRFS or OS.

Analysis of prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma: Cancer registry from a single tertiary hospital in Indonesia. A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcoma is one cause of mortality in adult malignancies. This tumor is rare, persistent, and highly-recurrent. Many patients are came in late stage. It is important to identify a prognostic tool that is reliable, easily obtainable, and widely applicable. The aim of this study is to investigate and analyze the prognostic value of clinicopathological and biomarker factors in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study extracts data from the musculoskeletal tumor registry from January 2012 to December 2018 in a single tertiary hospital. Eighty patients with diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma were included. Preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, Neutrophils/Lymphocytes Ratio, Hemoglobin, serum lactate dehydrogenase data were analyzed along with demographic, clinical, radiological and histopathological data. The relationship between variables on overall survival, distant metastasis, and local recurrence were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, there was significant relationship between hemoglobin, Neutrophils/Lymphocytes Ratio and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score with overall survival (p = 0.031, HR = 1.99; p = 0.04, HR = 1.129; and p = 0.044, HR = 3.89). A significant relationship was found between age and soft tissue sarcoma stage with distant metastasis (p = 0.046, HR = 1.95; and p = 0.00, HR = 3.22). In addition, we also found significant relationship between surgical margin with local recurrence (p = 0.018, OR = 3.44). However, on multivariate analysis the independent prognostic factor for overall survival was only modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (HR = 2.138; p = 0.011). Stage IIIA (HR = 5.32; p = 0.005) and IIIB (HR = 13.48; p = 0.00) were independent prognostic for distant metastasis. Surgical margin was independently associated with local recurrence (HR = 14.84; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score can be used as prognostic tool of overall survival in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Moreover, stage of STS and surgical margin can be used as a prognostic factor for distant metastasis and local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma respectively.

Low-grade soft-tissue sarcomas: What is an adequate margin for local disease control?

BACKGROUND

Whilst the resection margin is an established factor predictive of local control of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs), the adequacy of margin width for low-grade STSs has been rarely described. We aimed to investigate the margin adequacy and its prognostic relevance in low-grade STSs.

METHODS

109 patients who underwent surgical treatment for a low-grade STS were studied. The prognostic value of margin status was evaluated according to the R-, R+1-classification, and width in millimetres.

RESULTS

The 10-year local recurrence (LR) rates were 6%, 27%, 54% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively (p < 0.001), according to the R-classification. The R+1-classification resulted in a decreased LR rate in R1, but no major differences in LR rates in R0 and R2; 7%, 14%, 54% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively (p < 0.001). When classified by metric distance, 10-year LR rates were 0%, 8%, and 38% by ≥ 2.0 mm, 0.1-1.9 mm, and 0 mm margins, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with close margins (0.1-1.9 mm) who received adjuvant radiotherapy had a trend toward lower LR risk than those without radiotherapy (10-year, 4% vs. 12%; p = 0.406). The 5 and 10-year disease-specific mortality was 9% and 13%, respectively; margin width was not associated with disease-specific mortality but LR was a poor prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Whilst negative margin provided local control over 90%, excellent local control was achieved with microscopic margins ≥2 mm. The role of margins is more important than radiotherapy in local control. Margins do not determine survival, but LR is associated with a poor prognosis.

The adequacy of resection margin for non-infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas

OBJECTIVES

There remains no consensus on what constitutes an adequate margin of resection for non-infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). We aimed to investigate the role of resection margins in millimetres for non-infiltrative STSs.

METHODS

502 patients who underwent surgical resection for a localized, non-infiltrative, high-grade STSs were studied. The prognostic significance of margin width was analysed and compared with the conventional R- and R+1-classification of surgical margins.

RESULTS

The overall local recurrence (LR) rate was 13%; 9% and 27% with negative and positive margins, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with negative margins, the LR rates were greater than 10% in patients with margins ≤5.0 mm but reduced to less than 4% with margins >5.0 mm. When classified by the R- (or R+1)-classification, the 5-year cumulative LR incidence was 8%, 23% (16%), and 31% for R0, R1, and R2, respectively, which did not stratify the LR risk with negative margins. On the other hand, an accurate risk stratification was possible by metric distance; the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 29%, 10%, and 1% with 0 mm, 0.1-5.0 mm, and >5.0 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). This classification also stratified the LR risk in patients with or without adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

While a negative margin is essential to optimize local control in patients with non-infiltrative STSs, surgical margin width greater than 5 mm minimises the risk of local failure regardless of the use of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Disparities in Amputation Rates for Non-metastatic Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas and the Impact on Survival

BACKGROUND

There are no definitive recommendations guiding amputation use in extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). This study explores disparities in amputation rates and survival in patients with non-metastatic adult-type extremity STSs.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic adult-type extremity STSs were identified from the 1998-2012 National Cancer Database. Factors affecting amputation were examined across all ages and separately in adults (> 40 years), adolescent/young adults (AYA: ages 15-39), and children (age < 15). Impact on 10-year overall survival (OS) was explored.

RESULTS

Of 15,886 patients, 4.65% had an amputation. AYAs had the most amputations (6.4%) compared to children (5.9%) and adults (4.2%) (p < 0.001). Patients with public insurance (OR 1.3, CI 1.08-1.58) and from central states (OR 1.5, CI 1.2-1.86) were more likely to undergo amputation, whereas those from high income brackets (OR 0.8, CI 0.62-0.94) and treated at community cancer centers were less likely (OR 0.7, CI 0.62-0.90). Amputation was an independent risk factor for death at 10 years, with the greatest impact in AYAs compared to older adults (HR 1.7, p < 0.001). Treatment in eastern or central states, lower income, lack of private insurance, and comorbidities were all associated with decreased OS (all p < 0.05). Female gender (HR 0.8, CI 0.78-0.89) and high-volume centers (HR 0.8, CI 0.74-0.94) were associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although amputations for extremity STSs are rare, disparities exist across age groups, insurance and geography when it comes to the use of amputation in patients with extremity STSs. Moreover, having an amputation is an independent risk factor for death, with the greatest impact in AYAs.

Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors that account for 1% of all adult malignancies, with over 100 different histologic subtypes occurring predominately in the trunk, extremity, and retroperitoneum. This low incidence is further complicated by their variable presentation, behavior, and long-term outcomes, which emphasize the importance of centralized care in specialized centers with a multidisciplinary team approach. In the last decade, there has been an effort to improve the quality of care for patients with STS based on anatomic site and histology, and multiple ongoing clinical trials are focusing on tailoring therapy to histologic subtype. This report summarizes the latest evidence guiding the histiotype-specific management of extremity/truncal and retroperitoneal STS with regard to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

Soft Tissue Tumors of the Extremity

Although the vast majority of soft tissue extremity masses are benign, approximately 13,000 people in the United States were diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma in 2019. This article focuses on the optimal workup of soft tissue masses including the indications for ultrasound and MRI, as well as use of preoperative core needle biopsy. Current AJCC staging, surgical principles of soft tissue sarcoma management, and data regarding indications for radiation therapy and chemotherapy are reviewed. As up to 50% of patients with soft tissue sarcoma will develop recurrent disease, surgical management of locally recurrent and distant metastatic disease is discussed.

Efficacy and Safety of Microsurgery in Interdisciplinary Treatment of Sarcoma Affecting the Bone

Background: Sarcomas are tumors of mesenchymal origin with high variation in anatomical localization. Sarcomas affecting the bone often require an interdisciplinary resection and reconstruction approach. However, it is critical that microsurgical reconstruction strategies do not negatively impact tumor safety and overall survival, as limb salvage is only the secondary goal of tumor surgery. Here, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of microsurgery in interdisciplinary treatment of sarcoma affecting the bone.

Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients treated for soft-tissue and bone sarcoma at the senior author's institution with a focus on bone affection and microsurgical reconstruction between 2000 and 2019. This particular subgroup was further investigated for tumor resection status, 5-year survival rate, length of hospital stay, as well as overall complication and amputation rates.

Results: Between 2000 and 2019, 803 patients were operated for sarcoma resection and reconstruction by the Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery. Of these, 212 patients presented with sarcoma of the extremity affecting the bone. Within this subgroup, 40 patients required microsurgical reconstruction for limb salvage, which was possible in 38 cases. R0 resection was achieved in 93.8%. The 5-year survival was 96.7%, and the overall complication rate was 25%, of which 40% were microsurgery associated complications.

Conclusion: Safe and function-preserving treatment of soft-tissue and bone sarcoma is challenging. Primary reconstruction with microsurgical techniques of sarcoma-related defects enables limb-sparing and adequate oncosurgical cancer treatment without increasing the risk for local recurrence or prolonged hospital stay. The treatment of sarcoma patients should be reserved to high-volume centers with experienced plastic surgeon embedded in a comprehensive treatment concept.

Primary appendicular soft-tissue sarcoma resection: What tumour parameters affect wound closure planning?

Wound closure after wide, local excision of an appendicular soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) can be challenging. This study evaluates the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based tumour parameters in planning wound closure. A total of 71 patients with a primary limb-based STS, excluding vascular or osseous involvement, excluding the shoulder or hand and hip or foot were included. Axial MRI images were used to measure the circumferences and cross-sectional areas of the limb, bone, and tumour. The tumour diameter, length, and depth at the level of maximal tumour dimension were measured to identify the tumour's relative contribution to the planning of optimal wound closure management through primary closure (PC) or reconstructive surgery (RS). Eighteen patients required planned wound RS. Wound complications occurred in 14% overall. Tumours, which were closed by PC, were of significantly greater depth, shorter radial diameter, and shorter tumour circumference relative to those closed by RS. On multivariate analysis, tumour depth was the greatest contributory factor in predicting type of wound closure. A quantitative analysis of MRI-based tumour parameters demonstrates tumour depth as the most predictive factor in planning for the type of wound closure and may prove beneficial in providing greater insight into planned wound management of sarcoma resection.

Surgical resection margin classifications for high-grade pleomorphic soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity or trunk: definitions of adequate resection margins and recommendations for sampling margins from primary resection specimens

Adequacy of surgical resection margins for soft tissue sarcomas are poorly defined because of the various classifications and definitions used in prior studies of heterogeneous patient cohorts and inconsistent margin sampling protocols. Surgical resection margins of 166 primary, high-grade, pleomorphic sarcomas of the extremity or trunk were classified according to American Joint Committee on Cancer R and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society categories, as well as by metric distance and tissue composition. None of the cases were treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Multivariable competing risk regression models were evaluated and optimal surgical resection margins for each classification system were defined. Minimum safe tumor clearance was 5 mm without use of adjuvant radiotherapy and 1 mm with adjuvant radiotherapy. Predictive accuracy of margin classification systems was compared by area under receiver-operating characteristic curves generated from logistic regression of 2½-year local recurrence-free survival and other standard tests of diagnostic accuracy. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and margin distance classifications performed similarly, both of which showed higher sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to the American Joint Committee on Cancer R classification. The prognostic power of close or positive margins in prediction models significantly increased when six or more slides were submitted for assessment of surgical resection margins. Surgical resection margins for soft tissue sarcoma should be reported using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification or metric distance to the closest resection margin. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society wide/radical margins or tumor clearances of 5 mm (without adjuvant radiotherapy) or 1 mm (with adjuvant radiotherapy) appear to define the minimum safe surgical resection margins necessary to decrease the likelihood of local recurrence of high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas of the extremity or trunk.

[Resection margins in soft tissue sarcomas]

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that arise from the mesenchymal tissue. STS can form anywhere in the human body, with the extremities being preferred sites of predilection.

TREATMENT

A fundamental pillar of treatment is the surgical resection of soft tissue sarcomas. The goal is always an R0 resection with a safety margin. There is no consensus in the literature about the desired tumor-free resection margin. The decisive factors for these resection margins are histopathology, presence of anatomical barriers (capsule, tendon, fascia, cartilage, periosteum) and possibilities of (neo-) adjuvant therapy.

DISCUSSION

References in the literature support the role of resection margins as a predictor of local recurrence. Regarding the role of resection margins in overall survival, available data is divergent. There are known prognostic factors that influence overall survival, such as histological subtype, tumor size, tumor grading, and presence of metastases. So far, several studies have attempted to quantify the margins of resection, but no consensus has been reached, and debates are ongoing. When analyzing all the results of the data in the literature, it seems appropriate to aim for a negative resection margin >1 mm including an anatomical border structure, if possible.

Leiomyosarcoma: Clinicopathological study and retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in a series of 100 patients

The Authors reported a retrospective study of 100 Leiomyosarcoma (LMS), evaluating factors that may influence Overall Survival (OS), Local Recurrence Free Survival (LRFS), Metastasis Free Survival (MFS). Tumor Size (P = 0,0009), Local Recurrence (P = 0,0487), Distant relapse (P < 0,0001), Type of Presentation (P = 0,0213) were significant risk factors affecting overall survival (OS). Tumor Size (P = 0.024), age at diagnosis (P = 0,0086), type of presentation (P < 0,0001) and Local Recurrence (P = 0.0152) affected metastasis free survival (MFS). Type of presentation (P = 0,001) was an independent prognostic factor of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS).

The role of radiation therapy and margin width in localized soft-tissue sarcoma: Analysis from the US Sarcoma Collaborative

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are often treated with resection and radiation (RT)±chemotherapy. The role of RT in decreasing resection width to achieve local control is unclear. We evaluated RT on margin width to achieve local control and local recurrence (LR).

METHODS

From 2000 to 2016, 514 patients with localized STS were identified from the US Sarcoma Collaborative database. Patients were stratified by a margin and local control was compared amongst treatment groups.

RESULTS

LR was 9% with positive, 4.2% with ≤1 mm, and 9.3% with >1 mm margins (P = .315). In the ≤1 mm group, LR was 5.7% without RT, 0% with preoperative RT, and 0% with postoperative RT (P < .0001). In the >1 mm group, LR was 10.2%, 0%, and 3.7% in the no preoperative and postoperative RT groups, respectively (P = .005). RT did not influence LR in patients with positive margins. In stage I-III and II-III patients, local recurrence-free survival was higher following RT (P = .008 and P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RT may play a larger role in minimizing LR than margin status. In patients with positive margins, RT may decrease LR to similar rates as a negative margin without RT and may be considered to decrease the risk of LR with anticipated close/positive margins.

Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Thoracic Wall: More Prone to Higher Mortality, and Local Recurrence-A Single Institution Long-Term Follow-up Study

Objectives

This study aims to assess the impact of surgical margin and malignancy grade on overall survival (OS) and local recurrence free rate (LRFR) for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the thoracic wall.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study identified 88 patients, diagnosed and treated surgically for a nonmetastatic STS located in the thoracic wall between 1995 and 2013, using the population based and validated Aarhus Sarcoma Registry and Danish Sarcoma Registry. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and LRFR. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to determine prognostic factors for OS and LRFR.

Results

The 5-year OS was 55% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.65) and 5-year LRFR was 77% (95% CI: 0.67-0.85). High malignancy grade and intralesional/marginal resection were identified as negative predictors for OS. High grade was the only prognostic factor associated with a lower LRFR.

Conclusions

In this large, single institution, study tumor grade was the key predictor for OS and LRFR. Surgical margin only statistically significantly influenced mortality, not local recurrence.

[Soft tissue sarcomas: limb salvage using reconstructive plastic surgery techniques]

The treatment of choice for soft tissue sarcomas with local involvement is still the complete surgical removal into healthy tissue. The aim of surgery is to achieve tumor-free resection margins in the sense of a R0 resection. No other treatment option can equally replace this important oncological condition. The enormous development in the field of reconstructive plastic surgery and in particular the advances in flap techniques and microsurgery enable limb salvage and the functional reconstruction even in the case of extensive tumors.

Solitary pancreatic metastasis of extremity myxoid liposarcoma: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Myxoid liposarcoma has a distinct migration aptitude; however, pancreatic metastasis is rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report on the case of a 40-year-old female patient who suffered solitary pancreatic metastasis of myxoid liposarcoma and had a right thigh myxoid liposarcoma radical resection 5 years ago. The patient underwent a medial pancreatectomy and pancreaticojejunostomy for solitary pancreatic metastasis of myxoid liposarcoma. After 12 months of disease-free survival, the patient underwent an extended radical resection for the recurrence of the right thigh primary myxoid liposarcoma and received postoperative radiotherapy. Currently, the disease-free survival time after the last operation has been 22 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We reviewed the relevant literature and suggest that radical surgery might result in a good prognosis for patients with solitary pancreatic metastasis of myxoid liposarcoma.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation versus chemotherapy plus regional hyperthermia in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas: a retrospective comparison

PURPOSE

Localized adult high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) usually require multimodality treatment including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hyperthermia. If maximal preoperative tumor-shrinkage is envisaged, neoadjuvant chemotherapy + radiation (CRT) is often applied, however at the expense of relatively high toxicities and increased postoperative complication rates. This study aims to compare preoperative CRT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy + regional hyperthermia (HCT) regarding histopathological response, toxicity and outcome.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 61 consecutive high-grade STS patients treated between 2009 and 2016 were included. All patients were treated within a prospective treatment protocol. 28 patients received neoadjuvant CRT 33 patients HCT. CRT consisted of four cycles doxorubicin/ifosfamide and two cycles ifosfamide concomitant to 50.4 Gray external beam radiotherapy. HCT consisted of 4-6 cycles doxorubicin/ifosfamide with deep regional hyperthermia administered bi-weekly during each cycle. Association of treatment modality with overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses.

RESULTS

The overall patient characteristics were well balanced. Histopathological tumor response did not differ significantly between both groups (p = .67), neither did higher-grade toxicities during neoadjuvant treatment. Wound dehiscence (p = .018) and surgical hospital re-admissions (p < .001) were both significantly more frequent in the CRT group. Two-year OS, LC and FFDM rates of all patients were 93, 85 and 71% with no significant differences between CRT and HCT.

CONCLUSION

Compared to CRT, HCT seems equally efficient and appears to bear less surgical complications. Interpretation should be cautious due to the low number of patients and the retrospective nature of this study.

The impact of biopsy sampling errors and the quality of surgical margins on local recurrence and survival in chondrosarcoma

Purpose

To examine the frequency of computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy sampling errors in chondrosarcomas, as well as the impact of these errors and the achieved surgical margins on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

Material and methods

A total of 68 consecutive patients treated for chondrosarcoma from 2000–2015 were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years.

Results

The primary location was at the extremities in 46 patients (67.6%) and at the axial skeleton in 22 patients (32.4%). Seven patients underwent planned intralesional curettage. Surgical margins were assessed in the remaining 53 patients and included 21 wide (39.6%), 25 marginal (47.1%), and seven intralesional (13.2%) resections. Biopsy sampling errors occurred in ten patients (14.7%). LRFS was 82.2±7.8% at 5 years and 76.9±7.8% at 10 years. An intact anatomical barrier was associated with the most preferable LRFS of 89±10.5% after 10 years. DSS was 79.2±8.5% at 5 years and 75.5±6.4% at 10 years. The metric distance of the surgical margin and the presence of a biopsy sampling error did not affect either LRFS or DSS.

Conclusion

Even though histological grading in chondrosarcoma is difficult, sampling errors in preoperative biopsies are relatively rare and do not adversely affect outcomes. The presence of an anatomical barrier has a greater impact on LRFS than the metric distance of the surgical margins.

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the skin: a comprehensive review on diagnosis and treatment

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal tumors which can affect bone and soft tissue. Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare subtype localized to the skin or subcutaneous tissue. Due to the heterogeneity of sarcomas, reviews and guidelines with an in-depth focus specifically on primary LMS of the skin are sparse. This article is intended to provide an up to date and systematic overview on diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of this rare entity to provide a framework for decision making and management for dermato-oncologists. We discuss novel treatment options for advanced disease such as targeted therapy with kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade which may improve the prognosis even in advanced stages of LMS.

Adequate Local Control in High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity Treated with Surgery Alone at a Reference Centre: Should Radiotherapy Still be a Standard?

BACKGROUND

Established practice for the management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity and trunk wall combines perioperative radiotherapy (RT) with limb-preserving surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore whether high-quality surgery at high-volume centers may offer equivalent local control in selected cases, when RT needs to be avoided.

METHODS

All consecutive adult cases of primary, high-risk STSs treated in a high-volume reference center over a 12-year timeframe were included, and, on retrospective analysis, were divided into two groups. Group A received RT with surgery, and Group B received surgery alone. The primary endpoint was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS).

RESULTS

Overall, 390 patients were included (318 in Group A and 72 in Group B), with a median follow-up of 53 months. The main reasons for avoiding RT were patient choice and technical considerations (vascular bypass or flap reconstruction). No difference in R0 resection was seen between the groups (79% vs. 70%; p = 0.18), but Group A had more G3 tumors (80.5% vs. 68%; p = 0.021). No difference in 5-year LRFS was evident (84% vs. 81%; p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

LRFS did not differ between patients with high-risk STSs receiving perioperative RT and those treated with surgery alone. The study was retrospective and omission of RT was largely uncontrolled with inherent bias. Nonetheless, data suggest that in experienced centers, the omission of RT did not diminish local disease outcome. Future studies on a selective approach to RT administration are awaited.

Somatic Leiomyosarcoma of the Soft Tissues: A Single-Institutional Analysis of Factors Predictive of Survival in 164 Patients

BACKGROUND

Somatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive soft tissue sarcoma entity with a high metastatic potential. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic indicators of survival in patients with somatic LMS of the soft tissues.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the relationship between local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors in 164 patients who were suitable for surgical treatment in curative intent. Patients with soft tissue LMS of the extremities, the truncal wall and the head and neck area were included. The median follow-up time was 4.9 years.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, the 5-year estimate of the DSS, OS and LRFS rate were 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65.0-81.8), 70.6% (95% CI: 60.9-78.3) and 63.4% (95% CI 53.4-71.9), respectively. Thirty-eight patients (23.2%) developed distant metastases with a median survival time of 1.5 years after diagnosis of metastasis. Surgical margins attained at the initial oncologic resection and eventual re-excisions did not influence DSS, OS and LRFS significantly. Within the R0 subgroup, close and wide negative margins led to similar outcomes. High histologic grade (P < 0.001), size >5 cm (P = 0.002) and subfascial localisation (P = 0.002) were associated with significantly diminished DSS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only histologic grade was found to be an independent prognostic factor of DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this study could not determine a prognostic significance of surgical margins suggesting that tumour characteristics other than margin status are important. Tumour biology reflected by the histologic grade dictates the final outcome.

Patterns of care of superficial soft tissue sarcomas: it is not always just a lump

AIM

Superficial soft tissue sarcomas (S-STS) are generally considered low-risk tumors and have an excellent prognosis when treated with appropriate surgery and adjuvant therapy. However, they are often misdiagnosed then mistreated, leading to significant morbidity. This study aims to examine the patterns of care and outcomes of patients with S-STS, comparing those initially managed through sarcoma units versus elsewhere.

METHODS

Patients with S-STS from Prince of Wales Hospital in NSW (1995-2013) and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Victoria (2009-2013) were identified from a national sarcoma database. Baseline variables, treatment and disease outcomes were recorded. Statistical tests performed included univariate and multivariate analyses, chi-square tests, as well as the Kaplan-Meier method for 5-year local recurrence and survival rates.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were identified, with 35% initially managed at a sarcoma unit and 65% elsewhere. Patients initially managed at sarcoma units had larger tumors (>5 cm 39% vs 17%; P  =  0.036) with a trend to higher grade (61% vs 48%; P = 0.39). Patients that were initially managed outside a sarcoma unit more often underwent open surgical biopsies (P < 0.0005), had multiple operations (P < 0.0005) and had higher rates of local recurrences (24% vs 6.5%, P  =  0.038). They also had lower 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates (P = 0.022), but had higher metastasis-free survival (P = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, only larger STS size and male gender predicted for poorer metastasis-free survival (P = 0.042 and 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with S-STS initially managed outside specialized sarcoma units undergo more operations, with risk of greater morbidity, and have greater risk of local recurrence.

Analysis of Margin Classification Systems for Assessing the Risk of Local Recurrence After Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection

Purpose To compare the ability of margin classification systems to determine local recurrence (LR) risk after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection. Methods Two thousand two hundred seventeen patients with nonmetastatic extremity and truncal STS treated with surgical resection and multidisciplinary consideration of perioperative radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Margins were coded by residual tumor (R) classification (in which microscopic tumor at inked margin defines R1), the R+1mm classification (in which microscopic tumor within 1 mm of ink defines R1), and the Toronto Margin Context Classification (TMCC; in which positive margins are separated into planned close but positive at critical structures, positive after whoops re-excision, and inadvertent positive margins). Multivariate competing risk regression models were created. Results By R classification, LR rates at 10-year follow-up were 8%, 21%, and 44% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively. R+1mm classification resulted in increased R1 margins (726 v 278, P < .001), but led to decreased LR for R1 margins without changing R0 LR; for R0, the 10-year LR rate was 8% (range, 7% to 10%); for R1, the 10-year LR rate was 12% (10% to 15%) . The TMCC also showed various LR rates among its tiers ( P < .001). LR rates for positive margins on critical structures were not different from R0 at 10 years (11% v 8%, P = .18), whereas inadvertent positive margins had high LR (5-year, 28% [95% CI, 19% to 37%]; 10-year, 35% [95% CI, 25% to 46%]; P < .001). Conclusion The R classification identified three distinct risk levels for LR in STS. An R+1mm classification reduced LR differences between R1 and R0, suggesting that a negative but < 1-mm margin may be adequate with multidisciplinary treatment. The TMCC provides additional stratification of positive margins that may aid in surgical planning and patient education.

The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal tumors that account for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies. They can arise throughout the body due to their mesenchymal origin, although 60% of all STS occur in the extremities. Locally advanced STS can lead to significant functional morbidity and tend to local recurrences despite surgical resection. About 30% of all STS patients develop distant metastases with a median overall survival of less than 15 months. The treatment of choice in patients with localized disease is still surgical resection with negative margins. However, there has been a paradigm shift in the last few decades. Large retrospective analyses could not establish a strong association between radical resections and improved local control or survival. Previous radical concepts in STS surgery have been gradually replaced by more moderate approaches with function- and limb-sparing resections combined with radiotherapy. Here, the margin status appears to be of prognostic significance. However, several large retrospective analyses have presented inconsistent results, questioning the independent prognostic impact of surgical margins. This article reviews the literature critically, focusing on the changing role of surgical margins in STS surgery.

Amputation for Extremity Sarcoma: Contemporary Indications and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Amputation for localized extremity sarcoma (ES), once the primary therapy, is now rarely performed. We reviewed our experience to determine why patients with sarcoma still undergo immediate or delayed amputation, identify differences based on amputation timing, and evaluate outcomes.

METHODS

Records of patients with primary, nonmetastatic ES who underwent amputation at our institution from 2001 to 2011 were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed, and survival outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS

We categorized 54 patients into three cohorts: primary amputation (A1, n = 18, 33%), secondary amputation after prior limb-sparing surgery (A2, n = 22, 41%), and hand and foot sarcomas (HF, n = 14, 26%). Median age at amputation was 54 years (range 18-88 years). Common indications for amputation (> 40%) were loss of function, bone involvement, multiple compartment involvement, and large tumor size (A1); proximal location, joint involvement, neurovascular compromise, multiple compartment involvement, multifocal or fungating tumor, loss of function, and large tumor size (A2); and joint involvement and prior unplanned surgery (HF). There was no difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.19) or metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.31) between early (A1) and delayed (A2) amputation. Compared with cohorts A1/A2, HF patients had longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Indications for amputation for extremity sarcoma vary between those who undergo primary amputation, delayed amputation, and amputation for hand or foot sarcoma. Amputations chosen judiciously are associated with excellent disease control and survival. For patients who ultimately need amputation, timing (early vs. delayed) does not affect survival.

Surgical treatment of pelvic sarcoma in children: outcomes for twenty six patients

PURPOSE

Pelvic sarcoma is uncommon in children and challenging to treat. This study examined different surgical approaches to treat pelvic sarcoma with the aim of assessing the oncologic, and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients younger than 21 years of age who underwent surgery for pelvic sarcoma at our institution from 1992 to 2010. The functional status of the patients was examined after a minimum follow-up of two years.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in the analysis. Nineteen (73%) patients were male and seven (27%) were female. Mean age at presentation was 12.0 ± 3.9 years. Nineteen patients had Ewing sarcoma (73%), five had osteosarcoma (19%), one had chondrosarcoma (4%) and one had rhabdomyosarcoma (4%). Iliac wing resection with no reconstruction was done in three patients. Reconstruction with free fibular graft A-frame was performed in four patients, saddle endoproshtesis in five patients, iliac autoclave in one patient, and internal hemipelvectomy in nine patients. Hindquarter amputation was performed in five patients. Median follow-up was 4.6 years (range, 2.6-16 years). Nineteen patients were alive (73%); of those, 13 were known to be without disease, three were with disease and three did not have known tumor status. Six patients were reported deceased, three had osteosarcoma and three had Ewing sarcoma. Function was assessed in 17 patients; 64% were asymptomatic and ambulatory and 36% were symptomatic and ambulatory.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage reconstruction for pelvic sarcoma can be performed through various procedures on the extent of necessary bony resection. Survival rate and functional outcomes were promising in the performed study.

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated with R0 Resection and Improved Survival for Patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Undergoing Surgery: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is increasingly advocated for the management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Therefore, this study sought to characterize the impact of neoadjuvant RT on rates of R0 resection and overall survival (OS) in extremity STS patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

From January 2003 to December 2012, the study identified patients with a diagnosis of extremity STS from the National Cancer Database. After exclusion of patients younger than 18 years, not treated by surgery, who had metastases at diagnosis, intraoperative RT, and missing or unknown data, 27,969 patients were identified. Logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazard analysis were used to compare rates of R0 resection among preoperative, postoperative, and no-RT cohorts and to determine predictors of R0 resection and OS.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 59.5 ± 17.1 years, and 45.9% were female. The median tumor size was 10.5 cm. The data showed that 51% of the patients did not receive RT, 11.8% received preoperative RT, and 37.2% received postoperative RT. The rates of R0 resection were 90.1% for the preoperative RT cohort, 74.9% for the postoperative RT cohort, and 79.9% for the no-RT cohort (P < 0.001). The independent predictors for achievement of R0 resection included academic facility type (odds ratio [OR] 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.55), histologic subtype, tumor size (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.99-0.99), Charlson score (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-0.99), and preoperative RT (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.61-2.07). Both R0 resection and RT (pre- or post-operative) were associated with increased OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative RT independently predicts higher rates of R0 resection for patients with extremity STS undergoing surgical resection. Negative surgical margins and pre- or postoperative RT are associated with improved OS.

Individualised risk assessment for local recurrence and distant metastases in a retrospective transatlantic cohort of 687 patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a multistate model

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the effect of surgical margins and radiotherapy, in the presence of individual baseline characteristics, on survival in a large population of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities using a multistate model.

DESIGN

A retrospective multicentre cohort study.

SETTING

4 tertiary referral centres for orthopaedic oncology.

PARTICIPANTS

687 patients with primary, non-disseminated, high-grade sarcoma only, receiving surgical treatment with curative intent between 2000 and 2010 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The risk to progress from 'alive without disease' (ANED) after surgery to 'local recurrence' (LR) or 'distant metastasis (DM)/death'. The effect of surgical margins and (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy on LR and overall survival was evaluated taking patients' and tumour characteristics into account.

RESULTS

The multistate model underlined that wide surgical margins and the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy decreased the risk of LR but have little effect on survival. The main prognostic risk factors for transition ANED to LR are tumour size (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11 (size in cm)) and (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. The HRs for patients treated with adjuvant or no radiotherapy compared with neoadjuvant radiotherapy are equal to 4.36 (95% CI 1.34 to 14.24) and 14.20 (95% CI 4.14 to 48.75), respectively. Surgical resection margins had a protective effect for the occurrence of LR with HRs equal to 0.61 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.12), and 0.16 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.41) for margins between 0 and 2 mm and wider than 2 mm, respectively. For transition ANED to distant metastases/Death, age (HR 1.64 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.85) and 1.90 (95% CI 1.09 to 3.29) for 25-50 years and >50 years, respectively) and tumour size (1.06 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.08)) were prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper underlined the alternating effect of surgical margins and the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on oncological outcomes between patients with different baseline characteristics. The multistate model incorporates this essential information of a specific patient's history, tumour characteristics and adjuvant treatment modalities and allows a more comprehensive prediction of future events.