Clinical outcome in patients with complete pathologic response (pT0) to preoperative irradiation/chemo-irradiation operated for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer

Long-Term Outcome in a Phase II Study of Regional Hyperthermia Added to Preoperative Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Adenocarcinomas

Hyperthermia was added to standard preoperative chemoradiation for rectal adenocarcinomas in a phase II study. Patients with T3-4 N0-2 M0 rectal cancer or local recurrences were included. Radiation dose was 54 Gy combined with capecitabine 825 mg/m2 × 2 daily and once weekly oxaliplatin 55 mg/m2. Regional hyperthermia aimed at 41.5–42.5 °C for 60 min combined with oxaliplatin infusion. Radical surgery with total or extended TME technique, was scheduled at 6–8 weeks after radiation. From April 2003 to April 2008, a total of 49 eligible patients were recruited. Median number of hyperthermia sessions were 5.4. A total of 47 out of 49 patients (96%) had the scheduled surgery, which was clinically radical in 44 patients. Complete tumour regression occurred in 29.8% of the patients who also exhibited statistically significantly better RFS and CSS. Rate of local recurrence alone at 10 years was 9.1%, distant metastases alone occurred in 25.6%, including local recurrences 40.4%. RFS for all patients was 54.8% after 5 years and CSS was 73.5%. Patients with T50 temperatures in tumours above median 39.9 °C had better RFS, 66.7% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.047, indicating a role of hyperthermia. Toxicity was acceptable.

Surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a narrative review

Objective

To summarize the recent literature on surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

Background

LRRC is a heterogeneous disease that requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The treatment and prognosis depend on the site and type of recurrence. Radical resection remains the primary method for achieving long-term survival and improving symptom control. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy can reduce tumor volume and improve the R0 resection rate. Surgeons must clearly understand pelvic anatomy, develop a detailed preoperative plan, adopt a multidisciplinary approach for the surgical resection of the tumor as well as any invaded soft tissues, vessels, and bones, and ensure proper reconstruction. However, extended radical surgery often leads to a higher risk of postoperative complications and a low quality of life.

Methods

We searched English-language articles with keywords “locally recurrent rectal cancer”, “surgery” and “multidisciplinary team” in PubMed published between January 2000 to October 2020.

Conclusions

LRRC is a complex problem. Long-term survival is not impossible following multidisciplinary treatment in appropriately selected LRRC patients. The management of LRRC relies on a specialist team that determines the biological behavior of the tumor and evaluates treatment options through multidisciplinary discussions, thereby balancing the surgical costs and benefits, alleviating postoperative complications, and improving patients’ quality of life.

Phase II randomized trial of capecitabine with bevacizumab and external beam radiation therapy as preoperative treatment for patients with resectable locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: long term results

Background

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine is considered as a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The “Tratamiento de Tumores Digestivos” group (TTD) previously reported in a randomized Ph II study that the addition of Bevacizumab to capecitabine-RT conferred no differences in the pre-defined efficacy endpoint (pathological complete response).

We present the follow-up results of progression-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival data at 3 and 5 years.

Methods

Patients (pts) were randomized to receive 5 weeks of radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, 5 days per week with (arm A) or without (arm b) bevacizumab (5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks).

Results

In our study, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting shows no differences in pathological complete response (15.9% vs 10.9%), distant relapse-free survival (81.0 vs 80.4 and 76.2% vs 78.2% at 3 and 5 years respectively), disease-free survival (75% vs 71.7 and 68.1% vs 69.57% at 3 and 5 years respectively) nor overall survival at 5-years of follow-up (81.8% vs 86.9%).

Conclusions

the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine plus radiotherapy does not confer statistically significant advantages neither in distant relapse-free survival nor in disease-free survival nor in Overall Survival in the short or long term.

Trial registration

EudraCT number: 2009–010192-24.

Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01043484.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07661-z.

Improved Outcomes for Responders After Treatment with Induction Chemotherapy and Chemo(re)irradiation for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the multimodality treatment for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), oncological outcomes remain poor. This study evaluated the effect of induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation on the pathologic response and the rate of resections with clear margins (R0 resection) in relation to long-term oncological outcomes.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with LRRC treated in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven who underwent a resection after treatment with induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation between January 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Induction chemotherapy consisted of CAPOX/FOLFOX. Endpoints were pathologic response, resection margin and overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and metastasis free survival (MFS).

RESULTS

A pathologic complete response was observed in 22 patients (17%), a "good" response (Mandard 2-3) in 74 patients (56%), and a "poor" response (Mandard 4-5) in 36 patients (27%). An R0 resection was obtained in 83 patients (63%). The degree of pathologic response was linearly correlated with the R0 resection rate (p = 0.026). In patients without synchronous metastases, pathologic response was an independent predictor for LRFS, MFS, and DFS (p = 0.004, p = 0.003, and p = 0.024, respectively), whereas R0 resection was an independent predictor for LRFS and OS (p = 0.020 and p = 0.028, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy in addition to neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation is a promising treatment strategy for patients with LRRC with high pathologic response rates that translate into improved oncological outcomes, especially when an R0 resection has been achieved.

Oncologic Outcome of ypT1-2N0 Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Compared With pT1-2N0 Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the oncologic outcome of ypT1-2N0 mid and lower rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with pT1-2N0 rectal cancer.

METHODS

We compared the oncologic outcome of patients with mid and lower rectal cancer who underwent preoperative CRT and who did not, between February 2005 and August 2012.

RESULTS

Compared with patients who did not receive preoperative CRT, patients who received preoperative CRT did not have significantly different clinicopathologic features except clinical stage and distal resection margin. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were lower in patients who received preoperative CRT than those who did not (84.4% vs. 95.5%, P=0.029). Preoperative CRT was a prognostic factor affecting 5-year DFS in patients with pathologically proven stage T1N0 mid and lower rectal cancer (HR, 11.157; 95% CI, 1.735-71.762; P=0.011) CONCLUSIONS:: ypT2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT showed shorter DFS compared with pT2N0 rectal cancer.

The outcome and the frequency of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in curative resections for advanced rectal cancer: a population-based study

AIM

Pathological complete response (ypCR) after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer is associated with favourable survival and a low rate of local recurrence. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of ypCR among patients with advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative resection and to explore factors associated with survival.

METHOD

From 2000 to 2009, 1384 patients enrolled in the national population- based colorectal cancer registry of Norway with advanced T3 and T4 rectal cancer with N0-2, M0 received neoadjuvant long-course (chemo)radiation. The duration of follow-up was a median of 5 years.

RESULTS

ypCR was achieved in 147 (10.6%) patients. The estimated 5-year overall survival rate was 87% (confidence interval ± 5.4) among ypCR and 67% among non-ypCR (confidence interval ± 2.7) (P < 0.0001). Distant metastasis developed in 12 (8%) of 147 and 328 (26.5%) of 1237 patients respectively (P < 0.001). In a Cox proportional hazards ratio model the effect of ypCR on survival was adjusted for age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.056, P = 0.0001], metachronous metastasis (HR 4.7, P = 0.0001), local recurrence (HR 4.3, P = 0.0001) and surgical procedure (HR 1.48, P = 0.0001). The independent effect of ypCR (HR 0.65, P = 0.041) on survival almost disappeared compared with the univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The rate of ypCR in advanced rectal cancer was about 10%. This phenomenon seems to occur in tumours with a low risk of metastasizing. The contribution of neoadjuvant therapy to ypCR on survival was small or absent.

Barium enema and CT volumetry for predicting pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has been widely used for the prevention of local recurrence of locally advanced rectal cancer, and the effect of chemoradiotherapy is known to be associated with overall survival.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the association of the pathologic response grade with tumor recurrence rate after chemoradiotherapy, using radiographic analysis and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors as the parameters.

DESIGN

This study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution in Japan.

SETTING

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

PATIENTS

A total of 101 low rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy from July 2004 to August 2012 were enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The tumor reduction rate was measured with the use of traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, barium enema, and CT volumetry, and the correlation between the reduction rate and the pathologic response grade was examined.

RESULTS

The tumor reduction rate assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors showed no association with the pathologic response grade (p =0.61). In contrast, the radiographic response rate by both barium enema and CT volumetry strongly correlated with the pathologic response grade (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001).In terms of local tumor recurrence, those diagnosed as high responders by the pathologic response grade, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, barium enema, and CT volumetry had a lower recurrence rate (p =0.03, p =0.03, p =0.0002, and p =0.001). The difference between high responders and low responders was especially prominent by barium enema and CT volumetry.

LIMITATIONS

The study is limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Double-contrast barium enema and CT volumetry were superior to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors in evaluating the effect of chemoradiotherapy and predicting the likelihood of tumor recurrence.

Statin therapy is associated with improved pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Achieving a pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation improves prognosis in rectal cancer. Statin therapy has been shown to enhance the impact of treatment in several malignancies, but little is known regarding the impact on rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether statin use during neoadjuvant chemoradiation improves pathologic response in rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study based on data from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database. The 2 cohorts were defined by statin use during neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

SETTING

This study was performed at a single tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Four hundred seven patients with primary rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant therapy then proctectomy between 2000 and 2012 were included. Ninety-nine patients (24.3%) took a statin throughout the entire course of neoadjuvant therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor regression grading system, grades 0 to 3.

RESULTS

Patients in the statin cohort had a lower median regression grade (1 vs 2, p = 0.01) and were more likely to have a better response (grades 0-1 vs 2-3) than those not taking a statin (65.7% vs 48.7%, p = 0.004). Statin use remained a significant predictor of an American Joint Committee on Cancer grade 0 to 1 (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.33-3.82) in multivariate analyses. Although statin use itself did not significantly improve oncologic outcomes, an American Joint Committee on Cancer grade 0 to 1 response was associated with statistically significant improvements in overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific mortality, and local recurrence.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study and subject to nonrandomization of patients and incorporated patients on variable statin agents and doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy is associated with an improved response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. These data provide the foundation for a prospective clinical trial.

A prospective analysis of patient outcome following treatment of T3 rectal cancer with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and transanal excision

BACKGROUND

Local excision is an alternative to anterior or abdomino-perineal resection in patients with early rectal cancer. In more advanced disease, neo-adjuvant therapy (CRXT) can result in significant disease regression such that local excision may be considered. The primary aim was to assess oncological outcome in patients with T3 rectal cancer treated with CRXT and local excision due to unsuitability for or aversion to anterior resection and stoma. The secondary aim was to examine oncological outcomes in patients treated in a similar way in the published literature.

METHODS

Between July 2006 and July 2009, patients with rectal cancer staged T3, N0/N1, M0 who were deemed unfit for or who refused anterior resection were offered long-course CRXT. Patients were restaged 8 weeks following completion. If there was a good response (regression grade 2 or 3 clinically and radiologically), full thickness transanal excision was performed. All patients were followed regularly (monthly CT abdomen/pelvis and annual endoscopy) to assess for recurrence of disease. A literature search of PubMed was performed to identify all prospective data available of T3 rectal cancers managed with CRXT and local excision.

RESULTS

Ten patients were treated over 3 years. Six patients had complete pathological response, while four patients had a partial response. The resection margins following local excision were clear in all. There was no local recurrence (median follow-up 24 months, range 9-42 months).

CONCLUSION

Neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision is an option in patients unfit for or averse to major surgical resection if there is a good response to CRXT.

Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete pathologic response (CPR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (combined modality treatment, CMT) for rectal cancer seems associated with improved survival compared to partial or no response (NPR). However, previous reports have been limited by small sample size and single-institution design.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to detect studies comparing long-term results of patients with CPR and NPR after CMT for rectal cancer. Variables were pooled only if evaluated by 3 or more studies. Study end points included rates of CPR, local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), 5-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Twelve studies (1,913 patients) with rectal cancer treated with CMT were included. CPR was observed in 300 patients (15.6%). CPR and NPR patient groups were similar with respect to age, sex, tumor size, distance of tumor from the anus, and stage of disease before treatment. Median follow-up ranged from 23 to 46 months. CPR patients had lower rates of LR [0.7% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.90, P = 0.03], DR (5.3% vs. 24.1%; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, P = 0.0001), and simultaneous LR + DR (0.7% vs. 4.8%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.79, P = 0.01). OS was 92.9% for CPR versus 73.4% for NPR (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.84-7.22, P = 0.002), and DFS was 86.9% versus 63.9% (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.62-7.72, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CPR after CMT for rectal cancer is associated with improved local and distal control as well as better OS and DFS.

Predicting tumor response after preoperative chemoradiation using clinical parameters in rectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the clinical parameters and identify a better method of predicting pathological complete response (pCR).

METHODS: We enrolled 249 patients from a database of 544 consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT). A retrospective review of morphological characteristics was then performed to collect data regarding rectal examination findings. A scoring model to predict pCR was then created. To validate the ability of the scoring model to predict complete regression.

RESULTS: Seventy patients (12.9%) achieved a pCR. A multivariate analysis found that pre-CRT movability (P = 0.024), post-CRT size (P = 0.018), post-CRT morphology (P = 0.023), and gross change (P = 0.009) were independent predictors of pCR. The accuracy of the scoring model was 76.8% for predicting pCR with the threshold set at 4.5. In the validation set, the accuracy was 86.7%.

CONCLUSION: Gross changes and morphological findings are important predictors of pathological response. Accordingly, PCRT response is best predicted by a combination of clinical, laboratory and metabolic information.

Immunohistochemical analysis of tumour regression grade for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

AIM

Tumour regression grade (TRG) as defined by Rödel et al. has been used as an independent prognostic factor for rectal carcinoma after preoperative treatment by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Determination of TRG 2 and 3, semiquantitatively defined as more or less than 50% tumour regression, respectively, does not appear to correlate with prognosis. The purpose of this study was to find an immunohistochemical pattern to permit improved stratification of intermediate responders defined by disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHOD

Immunohistochemistry of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), CD133 antibody, p53 antibody and Ki67 antibody was evaluated using tissue microarrays (TMA) on post-treatment surgical specimens from 88 patients. CD133 expression was confirmed in the whole section when available.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 40 months, TRG was found to be an independent predictor of DFS (P = 0.05) and OS (P = 0.001) but no differences were found between TRG 2 and 3 in terms of DFS (P = 0.74) or OS (P = 0.41). The results of TMA showed an immunohistochemically poor prognostic profile for intermediate responders configured by negativity of CD133 expression. However, when examining CD133 expression in the whole section, there was an intermediate correlation with TMA and the prognostic significance was lost.

CONCLUSION

The results did not confirm the value of immunohistochemistry in predicting the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This questions the accuracy of TMA in detecting CD133 expression in this setting.

Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates factors associated with a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Approximately 20% of rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation achieve pCR, which has been associated with decreased local recurrence and improved recurrence-free survival. Means of predicting pCR remain incompletely defined.

METHODS

A total of 306 consecutive patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation then surgery between 1997 and 2007 were identified from a single-institution. Sixty-four patients with concurrent inflammatory bowel disease, hereditary colorectal cancer, other malignancy, urgent surgery, incomplete chemoradiation, or insufficient data were excluded. All patients received neoadjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy and external beam radiation. Histologic response was categorized as pCR or not-pCR, which defined the 2 study cohorts. Variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis with pCR as the dependent variable. Fisher exact test, chi2, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and logistic regression were used for analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the total patients, 242 were studied, including 58 (24%) that achieved pCR. The 2 groups were statistically similar in terms of age, gender, body mass index, tumor differentiation, radiation dose, and pretreatment stage. On multivariate analysis, an interval ≥ 8 weeks between treatment completion and surgical resection was significantly associated with a higher rate of pCR, which correlated with decreased local recurrence and improved overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Despite traditional beliefs that certain patient and tumor factors influence pCR, an extended interval between completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was the single most important determinant in achieving a pCR.

Salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: total mesorectal excision during the primary operation does not influence the outcome

AIM

This study investigated whether total mesorectal excision (TME), when carried out at the original operation for rectal cancer, influenced the effectiveness of subsequent salvage treatment for pelvic recurrence.

METHOD

Between September 1990 and January 2006, 124 patients underwent radiotherapy and salvage surgery at the Norwegian Radium Hospital for locally recurrent rectal cancer without known distant metastases. Most of the primary operations had been performed at other hospitals: 62 patients had undergone a non-TME procedure (most operations in this group of patients were carried out before 1994); and 62 patients had undergone a TME procedure (all operations in this group of patients were carried out after 1992). In the TME group, 17 patients also received radiosensitizing chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A lower proportion of primary abdominoperineal resection and more sensitizing chemotherapy seemed to be to the advantage of the TME group, while a higher frequency of intra-operative radiotherapy might be beneficial in the non-TME group. The 5-year survival and R0 stage achievement were 30/24% and 44/40% for non-TME/TME groups. The local re-recurrence rates were nearly identical, at around 50%, for both groups. There was no change in R stage over time.

CONCLUSION

A primary operation which includes TME does not reduce the effectiveness of subsequent salvage treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer is usually treated with preoperative chemoradiation. After chemoradiation and surgery, 15-27% of the patients have no residual viable tumour at pathological examination, a pathological complete response (pCR). This study established whether patients with pCR have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR.

METHODS

In PubMed, Medline, and Embase we identified 27 articles, based on 17 different datasets, for long-term outcome of patients with and without pCR. 14 investigators agreed to provide individual patient data. All patients underwent chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival functions were computed and hazard ratios (HRs) calculated, with the Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were done to test for effect modification by other predicting factors. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed for disease-free survival and overall survival with forest plots and the Q test.

FINDINGS

484 of 3105 included patients had a pCR. Median follow-up for all patients was 48 months (range 0-277). 5-year crude disease-free survival was 83.3% (95% CI 78.8-87.0) for patients with pCR (61/419 patients had disease recurrence) and 65.6% (63.6-68.0) for those without pCR (747/2263; HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34-0.57; p<0.0001). The Q test and forest plots did not suggest significant interstudy variation. The adjusted HR for pCR for failure was 0.54 (95% CI 0.40-0.73), indicating that patients with pCR had a significantly increased probability of disease-free survival. The adjusted HR for disease-free survival for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.91 (95% CI 0.73-1.12). The effect of pCR on disease-free survival was not modified by other prognostic factors.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with pCR after chemoradiation have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. pCR might be indicative of a prognostically favourable biological tumour profile with less propensity for local or distant recurrence and improved survival.

FUNDING

None.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a comparison between intravenous 5-fluorouracil and oral capecitabine

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine provides an attractive alternative to intravenous (IV) 5-flourouracil (5-FU) in chemoradiation regimes for rectal cancer by avoiding the need for intravenous access and inpatient stay. We aimed to compare retrospectively the efficacy of concurrent capecitabine with IV 5-FU in preoperative pelvic chemoradiation schedules for rectal cancer in our centre.

METHOD

Patients treated from January 2005 to June 2007 were included. Information was collected on patient characteristics; treatment details; pathological response to treatment; recurrence and survival. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V17.

RESULTS

All patients had pelvic radiation. Ninety-nine patients were treated with capecitabine and 97 with 5-FU. The two groups were well matched for age, sex and TNM stage. There were significantly more PS (performance status) 0 patients in the capecitabine group (51%vs 30%) (P = 0.001). Of the 99 patients in the capecitabine group, 91 (92%) were able to undergo surgery with 84 (93%) achieving R0 resection. In the 5-FU group, these proportions were 87 (90%) and 70 (80%). The difference in the rate of R0 resection was statistically significant (P = 0.024). The APR rate was 35% in the capecitabine group compared with 47% in the 5-FU group (P = 0.06). There was no significant difference in pathological complete response (pCR) rates between capecitabine (14%) and 5-FU(12%). A higher pCR rate (30%) was observed in patients who underwent a brachytherapy boost (P = 0.051). There were three local recurrences in the whole patient group, (capecitabine 1; 5-FU 2). Thirty-five patients had distant metastases, 14 in the capecitabine and 21 in the 5-FU group. There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence between the two groups. Six patients in each group had grade 3 toxicity with diarrhoea being more common with capecitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for rectal cancer is efficacious and comparable to 5-FU (IV). It is more convenient, is well tolerated and avoids the need for inpatient admission.

Introducing national guidelines on perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Norway: a retrospective audit

BACKGROUND

In 2006, perioperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin/oxaliplatin, and capecitabine was recommended in the National Guidelines for patients with resectable gastric cancer in Norway. We conducted a national audit related to clinical aspects, local organisation and the implementation of this multimodal treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All Norwegian departments of oncology were asked to submit aggregated data on gastric cancer patients who had started perioperative chemotherapy for cure; departments of surgery were asked to report on patients undergoing resection after preoperative chemotherapy. Data were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

All 20 departments of oncology and 20 of 21 departments of surgery responded. Of 336 patients operated on for gastric cancer and reported by surgeons, 144 (43%) received preoperative chemotherapy. 169 patients were reported by departments of oncology. 152 (90%) completed the preoperative cycles; 92 (54%) started the postoperative cycles; and 68 (40%) completed all cycles. Toxicity grade >or= 3, overall and haematological, increased during postoperative compared to preoperative cycles, 50 vs. 34% (P = 0.012) and 35 vs. 20% (P = 0.012), respectively. Surgical morbidity and mortality were 26 and <2%, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 86% of surgically treated patients. Five per cent had a complete pathological response (ypT0) and 48% were node negative (ypN0). Within the first year, the National Guidelines were implemented in 19 of 25 hospitals (76%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based series, the tolerability of perioperative chemotherapy reported in the MAGIC trial was reproduced. Toxicity grade >or= 3 was considerable and significantly increased related to postoperative cycles. The National Guidelines were rapidly adopted.

Downstaging without complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant treatment improves cancer outcomes for cIII but not cII rectal cancers

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether downstaging impacts prognosis in patients with cII versus cIII rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified from our colorectal cancer database 295 patients with primary cII and cIII rectal cancer staged by CT and ERUS/MRI who received 5-FU-based chemoradiation followed by R0 surgery after a median interval of 7 weeks during 1997-2007. The median radiotherapy dose was 5040 cGy. We excluded 58 patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) and compared among the remaining 162 patients pathologic downstaging (cII to ypI, cIII to ypII or ypI) versus no pathologic downstaging (c stage < or = yp stage). Outcomes evaluated were 5-year overall survival, 3-year cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, overall recurrence, local recurrence, and distant recurrence.

RESULTS

The median age was 58 years and median follow-up was 48 months. Patients with downstaging versus no downstaging were statistically comparable with respect to demographics, chemoradiation regimen, interval time between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery, tumor distance from anal verge, surgical procedures performed, and follow-up time. With the exception of local recurrence rates, downstaging resulted in significantly improved cancer outcomes for cIII but not cII.

CONCLUSIONS

Downstaging without pCR is a significant prognostic factor for patients with stage cIII rectal cancer. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation should be taken into account when defining the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with cIII rectal cancer.

The role of local excision in rectal cancer after complete response to neoadjuvant treatment

Correlation between pathological response of primary tumour and mesorectal lymph node involvement was prospectively evaluated to assess the role of local excision (LE) in rectal cancer after complete response to neoadjuvant treatment. A series of 272 consecutive rectal cancer, submitted to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) and surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME) were analysed. Tumour downstaging (pT) and tumour regression grade (TRG) together with sex, age, location of the tumour, pre-treatment clinical stage, type of chemoradiation and operation performed entered in an univariate and multivariate analysis. Pathological complete response on primary tumour was found in 56 patients (20.6%). Lymph node metastases were found in 72 patients (26.5%). The rate of positive nodes was 1.8% for pT0 and TRG1 cases, respectively, to go up to 6.3% for pT1 and 24.1% for TRG 2 cases, respectively. At the univariate analysis, factors with a statistically significant correlation with the risk of lymph node metastasis were: clinical pre-treatment N stage (p<0.05), pT stage (p<0.001) and TRG (p<0.001). At the multivariate analysis, the best predictors of pathologic lymph node involvement were pT stage (p=0.0013 ) and TRG (p=0.0011). Because LE is an adequate technique to assess the tumour pathological response and nodal involvement in pT0 or TRG1 cases seems extremely infrequent, radical resection is probably not justified after pathological complete response. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to establish if, in these cases, LE can guarantee the same oncologic results offered by the currently adopted protocols of RCT followed by radical resections.

Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

Patients with stage II and III rectal cancer benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Studies of postoperative adjuvant therapy consistently demonstrate decreases in locoregional recurrence with the use of radiation therapy. The use of postoperative chemotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival in certain studies. Preoperative radiation therapy decreases locoregional recurrence and in one study demonstrated an improvement in survival. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative radiation results in improved locoregional control, but not survival. Preoperative chemoradiation is the standard of care for patients with clinical stage II and III rectal cancer in the United States due to improved local recurrence, acute and late toxicity, and sphincter preservation compared with postoperative chemoradiation. Promising approaches include the incorporation of new chemotherapeutic and biologic agents into chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; new radiation techniques, such as the use of intraoperative radiation therapy and an accelerated concomitant radiation boost; and gene and protein expression profiling, to better predict response to treatment and prognosis.

Prognostic factors after preoperative irradiation and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer

AIMS

The experience of preoperative irradiation in clinically locally advanced rectal cancer for the period 1991-2003 is reported. Prognostic factors for survival and recurrence, and parameters for obtaining a free circumferential margin were evaluated.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 204 M0 patients given >45 Gy preoperatively (median age 66 years; 29% women; tumour level <16 cm from the anal verge).

RESULTS

Multivisceral and/or pelvic wall resections were performed in 61% of the patients. R0, R1 and R2 resections were achieved in 74%, 21% and 5%. Five-year survival was 52% for all patients, 60% for R0 resections, 31% for R1 and 0% for R2. The calculated 5-year recurrence rates were 13% for R0 resections and 24% for R1 resections (p<0.035). R-stage, N-stage, age, type of rectal resection and pelvic wall resection remained significant in Cox multivariate analysis for survival. Regarding local recurrence, the following parameters were independent: N-stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response and pelvic wall resection. Medium high tumour level and reduced histopathological differentiation are important individual factors that seem to predict increased risk for not obtaining a R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

After preoperative irradiation and surgery, about 50% of the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer without overt metastases (M0) can be cured.

Detection and management of extrahepatic colorectal cancer in patients with resectable liver metastases

The presence of extrahepatic disease has a great effect on the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the liver. FDG-PET scanning is currently the most sensitive way of detecting extrahepatic metastases in such patients. This is supported by 10 studies, which show that FDG-PET scan will discover extrahepatic disease in about one in six patients who have completed standard imaging. Staging laparoscopy is another means of detecting extrahepatic disease. Its role remains undefined especially in patients who have had FDG-PET scans. It should probably be restricted to patients with high clinical risk scores. In terms of treatment, patients with recurrence at the primary colorectal site as well as resectable liver metastases appear to benefit from resection of both sites provided that R0 resections can be obtained. Resection of involved hepatic pedicle lymph nodes in patients with resectable liver metastases is associated with poor outcome. The situation regarding patients with peritoneal and liver metastases bears a strong resemblance to that of primary site recurrence and liver metastases. Very acceptable survival can be expected if the peritoneal disease can be eradicated. Information regarding treatment of lung and liver metastases is the most complete of any of these areas. Good results may be expected if all the disease can be cleared. Caution is required in interpreting claims of good survival when study numbers are small and confidence intervals of data are not provided.

Pelvic exenteration affords safe and durable treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC) often involves exenterative surgery, which can be associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. To assist in patient selection for radical surgery, we sought to determine clinicopathologic factors influencing recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) of LARC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with LARC undergoing exenterative surgery were retrospectively identified in our institutional database. Factors evaluated included age, sex, primary versus recurrent tumors, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, resection margin status, recurrence, time to recurrence, and survival. The primary outcome was DFS. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and perioperative morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were identified; median age was 52 years, and median follow-up time was 30 months. The overall complication rate was 43%; rates were similar among the patients with primary (47%) or recurrent (37%) LARC. Primary or recurrent tumor status was the only factor significantly predictive of outcome after exenteration. Local recurrence rates were lower in the primary group (primary 22%, recurrent 52%, P = .05). A significant difference in 5-year DFS was found between primary and recurrent tumor (52% vs. 13%; P < .01). The median time to recurrence was longer in the patients with primary LARC (17 months vs. 8 months; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The complication rates for pelvic exenteration remain high, but the morbidity can typically be managed without a clinically important increase in hospitalization. In primary LARC, an aggressive surgical approach provides most patients 5-year DFS. Select patients with recurrent LARC will also benefit from pelvic exenteration.

Preliminary results of phase I trial of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT), leucovorin plus irinotecan and radiation therapy for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical attempts for locally recurrent rectal cancer often fail due to local re-recurrence and distant metastasis. Preoperative chemoradiation may enhance better local control and survival. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV), and irinotecan combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of the triple drug regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer received escalating doses of irinotecan on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (starting at 30 mg/m2, with 10 mg increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of UFT (300 mg/m2) plus LV (75 mg/day) on days 3 to 7, 10 to 14, 17 to 21, and 24 to 28. Radiation was given 5 days per week totaling 40 to 50 Gy (2Gy/day).

RESULTS

Six patients were treated at the starting dose, and 2 received the full scheduled chemoradiotherapy. The other 4 patients had grade 3 diarrhea and diarrhea was the DLT. One patient had partial response and he had subsequently radical surgical resection. Median progression free survival for local recurrence was 320 days.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan plus UFT/LV with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer was not feasible due to diarrhea in this setting. Modification of the treatment is needed.

Association between pathologic response in metastatic lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and risk of distant metastases in rectal cancer: An analysis of outcomes in a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare 5 x 5 Gy preoperative radiotherapy with immediate surgery vs. preoperative chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin) with delayed surgery in a randomized trial for cT3-T4 low-lying rectal cancer. Despite the downstaging effect of chemoradiotherapy, similar long-term outcomes were observed in both groups.

METHODS

The Cox model was used to evaluate the prognostic value of ypTN ("yp" denotes that pathologic classification was performed after initial multimodality therapy) categories and the surgical margin status in 291 patients.

RESULTS

Disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.51), distant metastases (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.77-1.78), and local control (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.74-2.84) were similar in both arms. The ypN status was the only independent prognostic factor for DFS (p < 0.001). An interaction (p = 0.016) between N stage and the assigned treatment was demonstrated. For ypN-negative patients, DFS was similar in both arms (HR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.47-1.48); however, for ypN-positive patients, DFS was worse in the chemoradiotherapy arm (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.07-2.77). The 4-year (median follow-up) DFS rate in N-positive patients was 51% in the 5 x 5-Gy arm vs. 25% in the chemoradiotherapy arm. The corresponding 4-year rates for the incidence of local recurrence and distant metastases were 14% vs. 27% (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.78-4.86) and 38% vs. 68% (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.21-3.48).

CONCLUSION

N-positive disease after chemoradiotherapy indicates radiochemoresistance. N-positive disease after 5 x 5 Gy RT includes both radiosensitive and radioresistant tumors, because the interval between radiotherapy and surgery was too short for radiosensitive cancer to undergo necrosis. Thus, the greater risk of distant metastases recorded in the chemoradiotherapy arm suggests that radiochemoresistance of nodal metastases from rectal cancer is associated with a high potential for developing distant metastases.

Surgery and pre-operative irradiation for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer in patients over 75 years of age

OBJECTIVE

Reports of multimodal treatment regimens especially focusing on locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer in the elderly, aged>75 years, are unavailable. We have tried to identify and evaluate pre- and peri-operative risk factors for morbidity and mortality and outcome after irradiation/surgery regimens in such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective registration of 86 consecutive patients aged>75 years undergoing elective surgery after irradiation 46-50 Gy for either primary locally advanced rectal cancer (n=51) or recurrent rectal cancer (n=35) from January 1991 to August 2003, 51 men and 35 women, median age 78 years (range 75-85 years) in a national cancer hospital.

RESULTS

Multivisceral resections were needed in 63% of patients and 70% R0 resections were obtained in locally advanced cases and 46% in recurrent ones. Both in-hospital- and 30-day-mortality was 3.5%. Sixty-two postoperative complications occurred in 38 patients, three of them fatal. Both operation times over 5 h and transfusion of more than 3 SAG were prognostic factors regarding infections. Estimated five-year survival in R0 patients was 46%. Estimated five-year survival for patients with nonmetastatic tumours with locally advanced primary cancer was 29% and for locally recurrent rectal cancer 32%. Old males had a higher mortality rate the first year after surgery than females with only 65% relative survival compared to a matched normal population. The estimated five-year local recurrence rates were 24% for R0 resections and 54% for R1 resections (P=0.434 ns) and 24% and 45% for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer (P=0.248 ns), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Thorough pre-operative evaluation and preparation and judicious surgery are important for achieving potentially curative treatment with acceptable morbidity in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer in patients over 75 years of age. We suggest that these patients should be evaluated and considered for treatment by multidisciplinary teams as younger patients.