Factors affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy

Waiting to Operate: The Risk of Salvage Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess postoperative morbidity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with salvage esophagectomy (SE).

BACKGROUND DATA

A shift toward a "surgery as needed" approach for esophageal cancer has emerged, potentially resulting in delayed esophagectomy.

METHODS

We identified patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who underwent chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy from 2001 to 2019. SE was defined as esophagectomy performed >90 days after chemoradiation ("for time") and esophagectomy performed for recurrence after curative-intent chemoradiation ("for recurrence"). The odds of postoperative serious complications were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. The relationship between SE and OS and DFS were quantified using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 1137 patients identified, 173 (15%) underwent SE. Of those, 61 (35%) underwent SE for recurrence, and 112 (65%) underwent SE for time. The odds of experiencing any serious complication [odds ratio, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.37-3.20); P =0.001] or serious pulmonary complication [odds ratio, 2.11 (95% CI, 1.31-3.42); P =0.002] were 2-fold higher for SE patients; SE patients had a 1.5-fold higher hazard of death [hazard ratio, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.25-1.94); P <0.0001] and postoperative recurrence [hazard ratio, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16-1.77); P =0.001]. Five-year OS for nonsalvage esophagectomy was 45% [(95% CI, 41.6%-48.6%) versus 26.5% (95% CI, 20.2%-34.8%) for SE (log-rank P <0.001)]. Five-year OS for SE for time was 27.1% [(95% CI, 19.5%-37.5%) versus 25.2% (95% CI, 15.3%-41.5%) for SE for recurrence ( P =0.611)].

CONCLUSIONS

SE is associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications and shorter DFS and OS.

Planned oesophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy versus salvage oesophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Salvage oesophagectomies are associated with an increased risk of mortality, although recent data suggests that long-term survival rates following salvage oesophagectomy are similar to planned oesophagectomy. The aim was therefore to meta-analyse outcomes for patients undergoing salvage versus planned oesophagectomies to assess the differences in short-term mortality and long-term survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted and compared by meta-analysis, using odds ratio and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, which compared patients in the planned oesophagectomy group (n = 23 555) to patients in the salvage oesophagectomy group (n = 2227). There were significant differences between the groups in terms of rates of postoperative mortality (5.7% salvage oesophagectomy versus 3.1% planned oesophagectomy, P = 0.0004), anastomotic leak (20.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 14.5% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.00001), pulmonary complications (37.1% salvage oesophagectomy versus 24.2% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001) and R0 margin (87.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 91.3% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between long-term survival rates at 5 years with 39.2% for salvage and 42.6% for planned oesophagectomy (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage oesophagectomies do offer a meaningful chance of long-term survival (at 5 years) for select patients with oesophageal cancer, but the elevated risk of post-operative complications and mortality following salvage oesophagectomy should be recognized.

Multimodal Treatment Strategies to Improve the Prognosis of Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy and sixth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with aortic or tracheal invasion is considered unresectable, and has an extremely poor prognosis; its standard treatment is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). In recent years, induction chemotherapy (ICT) has been reported to yield high response rates for locally advanced ESCC, and the efficacy and safety of ICT followed by conversion surgery (CS) have been investigated. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) or ICT, is necessary to improve ESCC prognosis. CS is generally performed for locally advanced ECC after ICRT or ICT when tumor downstaging is achieved, although its prognostic benefit remains controversial. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted a three-arm phase III randomized controlled trial (JCOG1510) to confirm the superiority of DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) ICT, over conventional dCRT, among patients with initially unresectable ESCC. In recent years, researchers have reported favorable outcomes of induction therapy followed by CS and salvage surgery, after dCRT or systemic immunochemotherapy. In this review, we will describe the latest developments in the multimodal treatment including chemotherapy, CRT, surgery, and immunotherapy, which may improve oncological and survival outcomes for patients with cT4 ESCC.

Combination of photodynamic therapy and endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was developed for residual or recurrent esophageal cancer after radiotherapy. Here, we report a case of successful treatment of highly elevated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that recurred after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) using PDT combined with endoscopic resection (ER). An 86-year-old man was found to have an ESCC in the mid-thoracic esophagus. One year and two months after dCRT, a local recurrence was seen. The recurrent ESCC had a highly elevated component. The ESCC was estimated to have invaded the deep submucosa at the highly elevated component. PDT was selected as a treatment option since no lymph node or distant metastases were found. However, there was concern that the laser would not be able to penetrate deep into the ESCC due to its high elevated component. Therefore, ER was performed to remove the highly elevated component, and PDT was performed later. However, after the ER, the circumference of the recurrent ESCC was found to be approximately half the circumference, and post-PDT stenosis was also a concern due to the wide circumference of the ESCC. Therefore, we limited the area of laser irradiation in one session of PDT. Four sessions of PDT were needed over 13 months, but a local complete response was achieved without adverse events.

Association between Submucosal Fibrosis and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers after Chemoradiotherapy

Simple Summary

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy have not been established. In this study, we focused on the fibrosis of the submucosa. As a result, we found that endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer can be performed reliably without adverse events, but the procedure takes longer for lesions with strong fibrosis of the submucosa.

Abstract

Endoscopic resection is a treatment of choice for a metachronous early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) appearing after a radical cure of esophageal cancer by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, non-curative resection, and procedural complications including perforation due to radiation-induced submucosal fibrosis, are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the association between submucosal fibrosis and the usefulness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in ESCC after CRT. This study retrospectively analyzed 13 lesions in 11 patients in our institute. Submucosal fibrosis under the lesion (F score) was classified into three levels (F0: none or mild, F1: moderate, and F2: severe) based on endoscopic and histopathologic findings. All lesions were F1 or greater (F1: 8 lesions and F2: 5 lesions). En bloc and R0 resection rates were both 100%. The procedural speed was slower in F2 than in F1 (F1 vs. F2; 15.1 mm²/min vs. 7.1 mm²/min, p = 0.019), without procedure-related adverse events. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 14–117 months) after ESD, 7 of 11 (63.6%) patients were alive without recurrence, and without ESCC-related death. ESCC after CRT reliably and safely resected en bloc by ESD but was more difficult in lesions with strong submucosal fibrosis.

Salvage endoscopic resection for cT1N0M0 local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection

OBJECTIVES

Salvage endoscopic resection is recommended when the local recurrence at primary site after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is localized and superficial. This retrospective study aimed to comparatively analyse the short-term outcomes and local control of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection versus salvage endoscopic mucosal resection for local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients who underwent initial salvage endoscopic resection for cT1N0M0 local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 1998 and August 2019 patients were assigned to either the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (40 patients; 40 lesions) or salvage endoscopic mucosal resection (56 patients; 56 lesions) group. We evaluated the en bloc and R0 resection rates, severe adverse events and local failure rate after salvage endoscopic resection. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors of local failure after salvage endoscopic resection.

RESULTS

The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection group than in the salvage endoscopic mucosal resection group (95% versus 63%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in R0 resection rate between the two groups (73% versus 52%, P = 0.057). One patient (3%) in the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection group had perforation. The 3-year cumulative local failure rate of salvage endoscopic mucosal resection was significantly higher than that of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (27% versus 5%, P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, salvage endoscopic mucosal resection (hazard ratio: 2.7, P = 0.044) was the only independent risk factor of local failure after salvage endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection is the effective treatment for local recurrence based on the short-term outcomes and local efficacy.

Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Disease after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of salvage surgery after failed definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for esophageal cancer have been well defined. However, only a few studies have focused on salvage esophagectomy for recurrent disease after CRT.

METHODS

In 227 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT, consisting of 116 patients who underwent esophagectomy for persistent disease (the persistent group) and 111 patients who underwent esophagectomy for recurrent disease (the recurrent group), the short- and long-term outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

The rates of any postoperative complication were similar between the groups (49.1% in the persistent group vs. 49.5% in the recurrent group, p = 0.951), although there was a higher rate of anastomotic leakage in the recurrent group (p = 0.027). Thirty-day mortality was also similar between the groups (1.7% in the persistent group vs. 0.9% in the recurrent group, p = 0.587). The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 33.7% and 28.0% in the persistent group and 48.7% and 41.7% in the recurrent group, respectively (p = 0.0175). In the recurrent group, clinically nodal status before CRT as well as pathologically nodal status and time to relapse were identified as independent prognostic factors. In the persistent group, pT and resection margin were identified as independent factors associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that salvage surgery for recurrent disease can provide acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Considering clinically and pathologically nodal status and time to relapse, adjuvant therapy might be offered for patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy for recurrent disease after definitive CRT.

Omitting surgery in esophageal cancer patients with complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment modality for locally-advanced esophageal cancer. However, patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after nCRT have been reported to have better prognosis. Further, the role of surgery in these patients is controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether surgery is still useful in patients with cCR after nCRT.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases for studies on surgical efficacy in complete responders after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The publication date was set to January 1, 2010-January 31, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio were used to compare the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and treatment mortality between the nCRT and nCRT plus surgery groups.

RESULTS

Six articles involving 609 patients were included. There was a significant benefit of nCRT for OS (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.99, p = 0.04), but not for DFS (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.35-6.86, p = 0.56). The nCRT group tended to have lower mortality than the nCRT plus surgery group (risk ratio = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-1.18, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Omitting surgery provides better OS in complete responders after nCRT. Adding surgery could increase the morbidity and mortality and decrease the quality of life. Thus, nCRT alone could be a feasible approach for patients with cCR.

Long-term outcomes of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection is considered a minimally invasive treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the long-term outcomes have not been fully evaluated. This study investigated the short-term and long-term outcomes of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for local recurrence or residual tumor after chemoradiotherapy from January 2006 to December 2017 were retrospectively investigated. Follow-up included endoscopic examination and computed tomography at least once every 6 months after salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection. Risk factors for disease recurrence after salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection were assessed using the Cox hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (33 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: local recurrence, n = 27; residual tumor, n = 6) were included. The median endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure time was 40 min (interquartile range [IQR], 33-58.5 min). En bloc resection was achieved in 31 (94%) of 33 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases. One patient with intraoperative perforation did not require surgical intervention and recovered with conservative treatment. A total of 16 patients (53%) had disease recurrence at a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR, 33-81 months). The 3-year overall, disease-specific, recurrence-free and local recurrence-free survival rates were 75%, 82%, 58% and 90%, respectively. The positive vertical margin, submucosal invasion in the endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen and piecemeal resection were significantly associated with disease recurrence after salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection is a feasible treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with acceptable long-term outcomes. However, for cases with positive vertical margins and submucosal invasion in the endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen, salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes were insufficient and additional treatment might be required.

Salvage Esophagectomy

Salvage esophagectomy is an option for patients with recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy or those who undergo active surveillance after induction chemoradiation therapy. Salvage resection is associated with higher rates of morbidity compared with planned esophagectomy but offers patients with locally advanced disease a chance at improved long-term survival. Salvage resection should be preferentially performed in a multidisciplinary setting by high-volume and experienced surgeons. Technical considerations, such as prior radiation dosage, radiation field, and choice of conduit, should be taken into account.

Comparison of Aggressive Planned Salvage Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Borderline Resectable T4 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

We compare planned salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy (SALV) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (NCRS) for borderline resectable T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients underwent planned SALV, and 20 underwent NCRS from 2004 to 2017. The short-term outcome measures were the R0 resection rate, complications, and treatment-related mortality. The long-term outcome measures were the 5-year overall survival rate and causes of death.

RESULTS

R0 resection rate was similar between the SALV and NCRS groups (81% versus 85%). The incidence of postoperative pneumonia (35% versus 18%) and treatment-related mortality rate (9% versus 0%) tended to be higher in the SALV. ypT grade 2-3 (65% versus 30%, p = 0.012) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb complications (32% versus 0%, p = 0.008) were significantly more frequent in the SALV group. The groups had similar 5-year overall survival (26% versus 27%). The causes of death in the SALV and NCRS groups were primary esophageal cancer in 35% and 55% of patients, respectively, and pulmonary-related mortality in 24% and 5%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed the following significant poor prognostic factors: stable disease as the clinical response, preoperative body mass index (BMI) of < 18.5 kg/m², ypN stage 1-3, and R1-2 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

SALV was associated with a higher incidence of late pulmonary-related mortality but had a stronger antitumor effect than NCRS. Consequently, the survival rate was similar between the groups. Surgery is recommended for patients with a partial response and preoperative BMI of ≥ 18.5 kg/m².

Advantageous factors of R0 curative conversion esophagectomy and the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy after induction therapy for cT4b thoracic esophageal cancer

AIM

This study aimed to clarify the prognostic factors, the advantageous factors of R0 curative resection, and optimal extents of lymph node dissection for conversion esophagectomy after induction therapy.

METHODS

Among 1903 patients with esophageal cancer at Toranomon Hospital between January 2006 to May 2020, 151 patients with locally advanced T4b thoracic esophageal cancer were divided into two groups according to treatment: conversion surgery group (n = 54) and non-surgical treatment group (n = 97) for comparison.

RESULTS

The patients who underwent R0 curative resection showed preferable survival comparable to the survival rate of patients with cCR in the non-surgical treatment group (1-, 3- and 5-year survival: 96.9%, 82.1% and 76.7% vs 94.1%, 86.3%, and 86.3%; P = 0.770). Multivariate analysis revealed that the T4b tumor invasion by primary site (odds ratio (OR) = 6.100; 95% CI, 1.439-25.865: P = 0.014) and time to conversion surgery from start of induction therapy within four months (OR = 5.229; 95% CI, 1.296-21.102: P = 0.020) were all independent advantageous factors of R0 curative resection. Actuarial 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates in patients who underwent conversion surgery with D2-3 lymphadenectomy were 90.9%, 48.6%, and 40.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

R0 resection led to improved prognosis in conversion esophagectomy for cT4b esophageal cancer. The T4b tumor invasion by primary site and time to conversion surgery from start of induction therapy within 4 months were independent advantageous factors of R0 curative resection. In addition, standard radical esophagectomy including prophylactic D2-/3- lymphadenectomy should be performed if it is possible, while taking adequate care regarding the increased risk after induction therapy.

Patient selection for salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

With the widespread use of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), salvage surgery for recurrence/residual patients became prevalent. However, survival impact of salvage surgery remains obscure at present.

METHODS

The updated clinical outcomes of salvage surgery were investigated to know its survival impact. Of the 155 ESCC patients who underwent dCRT between 2009 and 2016, we included 85 patients with recurrence or residual disease. The median follow-up was 65 months.

RESULTS

Of the 85 patients with progression disease, there were 42 and 43 patients of recurrence and residual disease, respectively. Salvage surgery was performed in 27 patients after dCRT, including 15 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of salvage surgery and otherwise patients was 66.1% and 14.5%, and the patients with salvage surgery had a significantly better prognosis (p < 0.0001). In the 15 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy, residual disease, lymph node metastasis-positive (ycN+) after dCRT, and pathological lymph node metastasis-positive (ypN+) were significantly associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.0492, p = 0.0006, p = 0.0276), and the 5-year OS rates for the ycN/ypN combinations were 90%, 33.3%, and 0% in ycN-/ypN-, ycN+/ypN-, and ycN+/ypN+ patients, respectively (p = 0.0026). In a multivariate analysis, ycN+ was an independent poor prognostic factor (HR 13.6, 95% CI 1.65-286.8, p = 0.0154).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival impact of salvage surgery after dCRT is robust, and lymph node metastasis after dCRT may help determine the indication for salvage esophagectomy.

Efficacy of traction, using a clip-with-thread, for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal lesions with fibrosis in an ex vivo pig training model

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of recurrent esophageal carcinoma is technically difficult to perform due to submucosal fibrosis that develops after definitive chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of clip-with-thread traction for ESD of esophageal lesions with submucosal fibrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four endoscopists excised 16 lesions by ESD in an ex vivo pig training model. Mock lesions (30 mm in diameter) were created, including a 10-mm area of submucosal fibrosis in the center of each lesion. Each endoscopist performed two ESDs with traction (ESD-T) and two without traction (ESD-N). The primary outcome was the time required for submucosal dissection. Secondary outcomes were the rate of en bloc (complete) resection and perforation during the procedure, and the total amount of solution injected.

RESULTS

All esophageal ESDs were completed. The median dissection time was significantly shorter for the ESD-T group (median 12.5 min, interquartile range 10.2-14.5) when comparing to the ESD-N group (median 18.0 min, interquartile range 14.6-19.2) (P=0.040). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in both groups, with a rate of complete resection of 87.5% and a rate of perforation of 37.5% for both groups. The median amount of solution injected was not significantly different between the ESD-T (18.0 ml) and ESD-N (20.5 ml) groups (P=0.526).

CONCLUSION

Clip-with-thread traction improved the performance of ESD for lesions with submucosal fibrosis. However, the method might not reduce the risk of perforation, which remains an important clinical issue to resolve.

Salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a potentially curative treatment modality, even for patients with unresectable T4 tumors. For patients who fail dCRT, salvage esophagectomy is known to be a high-risk procedure. However, the efficacy and safety of salvage surgery for these patients remain unclear.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 ESCC were assessed, and both outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the study population, R0 resection was achieved in 19 patients (54.3%). Postoperatively, 8 patients (22.9%) experienced Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher complications, and 3 patients (8.6%) registered surgery-related mortality. Overall survival rates were 45.7%, 28.6%, and 5.7% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, residual or relapsed tumor limited to T2 or less was an independent prognostic factor for better survival (P = 0.010). On the other hand, postoperative pneumonia and incomplete resection were negative prognostic factors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). Nodal involvement and extent of lymph node dissection did not impact patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable T4 ESCC is considered a high-risk surgery with poor prognosis, long-term survival may be achieved in patients with ≤ T2 residual tumors. In addition, R0 resection and postoperative pneumonia prevention are crucial to improve patient survival.

Outcome of delayed versus timely esophagectomy after chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Salvage and delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but recent series have shown similar outcomes compared to timely esophagectomy. We aim to evaluate outcomes for delayed and salvage esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma utilizing a large national database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database for 2004 to 2014 was queried for patients with clinical stage II or III esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative CRT and esophagectomy. Patients who underwent surgery <90 days after CRT were defined as the timely esophagectomy group (n = 7822), and those who underwent surgery ≥90 days after CRT were defined as the delayed esophagectomy group (n = 667).

RESULTS

A total of 8489 patients met our inclusion criteria. The median post-CRT interval was 49 days (range, 40-61 days) for the timely esophagectomy group and 109 days (range, 97-132 days) for the delayed esophagectomy group. The delayed group was more likely to be of black race (2.3% vs 1.2%; P < .01) and more likely to have Medicare (47.9% vs 39.8%; P < .001). There were no significant between-group differences in chemotherapy regimens (P = .17), radiation dose (P = .18), or surgical approach (P = .48). The delayed esophagectomy group had higher rates of pathological complete response (22.2% vs 18.6%; P = .043) and 90-day postoperative mortality (10.4% vs 7.8%; P < .01). On multivariate analysis, delayed esophagectomy was not independently associated with decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large retrospective database study, despite increased perioperative mortality, delayed and salvage esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma appear to have similar long-term survival as timely esophagectomy. Delayed and salvage esophagectomy may be offered to patients who do not receive timely esophagectomy after CRT.

Prognostic Factors and Appropriate Lymph Node Dissection in Salvage Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

A suitable treatment strategy for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 cases has not been established and remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the independent prognostic factors, surgical indications, and optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for T4 esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Of 803 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the authors' institution from 2006 to March 2018, the study included 33 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with locally advanced T4 cancer. The study examined the baseline attributes and treatment results of these cases and evaluated the prognostic factors and treatment strategies.

RESULTS

The independent favorable prognostic factors in T4 cancer (T4a/T4b = 11/22) included non-T4b status [hazard ratio (HR), 15.311; 95% confidence-interval (CI), 1.277-183.5] and R0 resection (HR, 14.706; 95% CI, 1.193-166.67). For the cases in which R0 resection was possible (n = 14), both the 1- and 5-year survival rates were 90.9%, whereas for the cases without R0 dissection (n = 19), the 1- and 5-year survival rates were respectively 44.9% and 0%. In the univariate analysis, the patients who underwent two- or three-field lymph node dissection tended to have a better prognosis (p = 0.062), and those with 60 or more lymph nodes dissected had a significantly better prognosis (p = 0.038). For the patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with typical lymph node dissection, the rate of complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher (33.3%) was not increased, indicating that the procedure was relatively safe.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that in salvage esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancer, R0 resection led to improved prognosis. Because typical two- or three-field lymph node dissection including prophylactic dissection could be performed safely and led to a better prognosis in salvage esophagectomy, typical esophagectomy including prophylactic lymph node dissection should be performed if possible.

Prognostic Factors of Salvage Esophagectomy for Residual or Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to confirm prognostic factors for salvage esophagectomy for remnant or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological backgrounds of 50 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy between April 2005 and January 2016. Salvage esophagectomy comprised 40 three-incision esophagectomies, two transhiatal esophagectomies and eight pharyngolaryngoesophagectomies. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were assessed using Cox regression analysis of the factors.

RESULTS

Salvage esophagectomy remains a highly invasive surgery and correlated with a higher incidence of all morbidities of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDc) ≥II, severe morbidities of CDc ≥ IIIb, any pulmonary morbidities and chylorrhea, compared with those in patients without preoperative definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cox regression analysis suggested that R0 resection (hazard ratio [HR] 6.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-9.68, P = 0.002), absence of severe complications (HR 4.97; 95% CI 1.70-14.81, P = 0.004) and early pStage (0-II) (HR 3.42; 95% CI 1.24-10.12, P = 0.018) were independent prognostic factors for salvage esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage esophagectomy remains correlated with a high incidence of postoperative complications. Avoiding non-curative surgery and reducing the incidence of severe postoperative complications are important if patients are to receive prognostic benefit of this highly invasive surgery.

Salvage endoscopic resection (ER) after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: What are the risk factors for recurrence after salvage ER?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Salvage endoscopic resection (ER) is among the curative treatments for superficial local failure after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study aimed to clarify risk factors for recurrence after salvage ER.

METHODS

This study enrolled consecutive ESCC patients treated with salvage ER for local failure after CRT between 1998 and 2013. Recurrences after salvage ER included locoregional recurrences and distant metastases. Multivariate analysis was carried out on clinicopathological parameters to identify risk factors for post-salvage ER recurrence.

RESULTS

Of the 72 patients enrolled in this study, 37/8/23/4 patients had been staged before CRT as cT1/T2/T3/T4 and 44/28 patients as cN0/N1, respectively, and local failures detected before salvage ER were residual lesions after CRT in 19 and local recurrences in 53 patients. Resected specimens were classified as pT1a (M) in 45 and pT1b (SM) in 27 patients. During the median 45-month follow up (range, 3-175 months) after salvage ER, 27 (38%) patients developed recurrence with a 3-year recurrence-free survival rate of 48.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.5-60.3). Multivariate analysis showed that residual lesions after CRT (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.32-4.94) and lesions with a submucosal tumor (SMT)-like appearance before salvage ER (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.04-4.18) were significantly associated with post-salvage ER recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical findings (e.g. residual tumors found immediately after CRT and macroscopic SMT-like appearance before salvage ER) were shown to be significant risk factors for post-salvage ER recurrence.

Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: How to Improve Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Locoregional recurrence rates after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) are high. Salvage surgery (SALV) is considered the best treatment option in case of persistent or recurrent disease for operable patients, but SALV has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to identify factors linked to outcomes after SALV to better select candidates and to optimize perioperative care.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed data from 308 consecutive SALV patients from a large multicenter European cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with in-hospital postoperative morbidity, anastomotic leakage (AL), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The in-hospital postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 8.4 and 34.7%, respectively. Squamous cell histology (p = 0.040) and radiation dose ≥ 55 Gy (p = 0.047) were independently associated with major morbidity. The AL rate was 12.7%, and cervical anastomosis was independently associated with AL (p = 0.002). OS at 5 years was 34.0%. Radiation dose ≥ 55 Gy (p = 0.003), occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.006), ypTNM stage 3 (p = 0.019), and positive surgical margins (p < 0.001) were linked to poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

SALV is a valuable option for patients with persistent or recurrent disease after dCRT and offers long-term survival. Factors such as radiation dose and anastomosis location identified here will help to optimize outcomes after SALV, which may be considered a standard treatment in the EC therapeutic armamentarium.

Comparison between neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for overall survival in patients with clinical Stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG1406-A)

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NAC-S) represents the standard treatment for patients with Stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is performed in patients who refuse or have contraindications to surgery. However, randomized clinical trials that compare NAC-S with CRT have not been conducted. The aim of this study was to explore subgroups of patients undergoing CRT to identify those with survival outcomes potentially equivalent to NAC-S.

Methods

Pooled data from two clinical trials in patients with Stage II/III ESCC, the JCOG9907 trial and the JCOG9906 trial were used. JCOG9907 demonstrated that NAC-S resulted in superior overall survival (OS) compared with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. JCOG9906 was a single-arm trial that explored the efficacy and safety of CRT. The eligibility criteria in the two trials were almost identical. Subgroup analyses of clinical data (serum albumin, cT, cN, cstage and tumor location) were conducted with Cox proportional hazards regression models for patients assigned to receive NAC-S in JCOG9907 and patients in JCOG9906.

Results

The analysis comprised 163 patients from JCOG9907 in NAC-S arm (NAC-S group) and 73 patients from JCOG9906 who received CRT (CRT group). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. OS was better in the NAC-S group than the CRT group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.72; 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.50). All subgroups in the NAC-S group had longer OS compared with those in the CRT group.

Conclusions

OS was superior after NAC-S rather than CRT. None of the CRT subgroups had similar OS to the NAC-S groups.

Salvage esophagectomy: safe therapeutic strategy?

The objectives of this review were to assess both the short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients managed with definitive chemoradiotherapy, and salvage esophagectomy subsequently in comparison to those neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by planned esophagectomy (NCRS) for esophageal cancer from published literature. Eleven studies comprising 1,906 patients were included, 563 in the salvage group and 1,343 in the NCRS group. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference between salvage and NCRS groups in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) =1.17; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.94-1.46, P=0.148], postoperative mortality [pooled odds ratios (POR) =1.12; 95% CI, 0.52-2.41, P=0.775], pulmonary complications (POR =1.24; 95% CI, 0.83-1.86, P=0.292) and positive resection margin incidence (POR =1.29; 95% CI, 0.94-1.76, P=0.114). However, within the salvage group there were increases in postoperative morbidity (POR =1.30; 95% CI, 1.00-1.67, P=0.046) and anastomotic leak (POR =1.88; 95% CI, 1.41-2.51, P<0.001). Herein we found that salvage esophagectomy has similar short- and long-term mortality in comparison to planned esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, anastomotic leak is increased following salvage esophagectomy suggesting the need for this practice to be reserved for high volume surgeons within high volume centers.

Salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent disease after definitive chemoradiation

Locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer is treated by some oncologists with definitive chemoradiation. The optimal strategy to treat persistent or recurrent disease after definitive chemoradiation is controversial. We reviewed the literature to determine current treatment options and optimal approaches. Salvage esophagectomy of relapsed or recurrent esophageal cancer has traditionally been associated with increased risk. Modern literature, however, suggests that in specialized high volume centers the risk of salvage esophagectomy when accompanied with various risk-reducing approaches (anastomosis in non-radiated esophagus, omental transposition, selective use of alternative conduits and two stage procedures) is similar to planned esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Long-term survival rates following salvage esophagectomy are also achievable and similar to planned esophagectomy. Since there are no other potentially curable treatment options, we recommend that all physiologically fit patients with locoregionally persistent or recurrent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation be referred to a specialized high volume esophageal center for salvage esophagectomy.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the significance of salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy

The therapeutic strategy to be recommended in case of recurrent or persistent squamous cell esophageal cancer after completed definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has to be documented. Salvage esophagectomy has traditionally been recognized as a viable option, but many clinicians oppose the use of surgery due to the associated excessive morbidity and mortality. 'Second-line' chemoradiotherapy (CRT) without surgery may offer a treatment alternative in these difficult and demanding clinical situations. Until now, no comprehensive attempt has been carried out to compare the respective therapeutic options. A systematic literature search was performed focusing on studies comparing survival and treatment-related mortality in patients submitted to salvage esophagectomy or second-line CRT for recurrent or persistent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after dCRT. Hazard ratios and risk ratios were calculated to compare the effect of these therapeutic strategies on overall survival and treatment-related mortality, respectively. Four studies containing 219 patients, with persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after dCRT, were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed an overall survival benefit following salvage esophagectomy with a pooled hazard ratio for death of 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.21-0.86, P = 0.017) compared with second-line CRT. A treatment-related mortality of 10.3% was recorded in the 36 patients who were submitted to salvage esophagectomy, while it was impossible to perform a meta-analysis comparing treatment-related mortality between the groups. Salvage esophagectomy offers significant gain in long-term survival compared with second-line CRT, although the surgery is potentially at a price of a high treatment-related mortality.

Prognostic factors for salvage endoscopic resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic resection is one treatment option for residual or locally recurrent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone. However, little is known about the clinical benefit of salvage endoscopic resection for these lesions. Therefore, the effectiveness and prognostic factors of salvage endoscopic resection were investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent salvage endoscopic resection after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone were reviewed. The method of salvage endoscopic resection was endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap (EMR-C), strip biopsy, or endoscopic submucosal dissection. The effectiveness and prognostic factors of salvage endoscopic resection were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients with 49 lesions underwent salvage endoscopic resection. Baseline clinical stages were I in 23 patients, II in 3 patients, III in 9 patients, and IV in 2 patients. The number of locoregional recurrences and residual lesions were 35 and 14, respectively. The curative en bloc resection rate was 53.1 % (26/49). The total incidence of complications was 18.9 % (7/37); all were successfully managed conservatively. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 72.9 % and 53.3 %, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 54 months. Baseline clinical T1 - 2 and N0 were significant factors for good prognosis in terms of overall survival on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage endoscopic resection, especially EMR-C, is a safe and feasible procedure to control residual or recurrent superficial esophageal SCC after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone. The present results showed that baseline clinical T1 - 2 and N0 before chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy were significant prognostic factors.

Chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer

Chemoradiotherapy has been clinically indicated for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who refuse surgical resection and in locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy prolongs survival than radiation therapy alone when given as definitive treatment. Therefore, chemoradiotherapy is recognized as the standard non-invasive treatment for patients with localized esophageal cancer who opt for non-surgical treatment. JCOG9906 showed promising outcomes for stage II/III ESCC patients. But there are some problems about chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Late toxicities are sometimes lethal for patients who achieved complete response even after years. Salvage treatment for residual or recurrent disease is unestablished. Modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group regimen at the dose of 50.4 Gy reduced late toxicities without reducing efficacy. Optimal timings and procedure of salvage surgery and endoscopic therapy is evaluated in JCOG0909. Strategy including salvage therapy after chemoradiotherapy should be considered at the time of starting the treatment. Targeted therapy has not shown adding effect for chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma yet. New agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, are expected to show synergistic effect with chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further investigation is needed.

Salvage photodynamic therapy for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a less-invasive salvage treatment option for local failure at the primary site after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The objective of this study was to clarify the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of salvage PDT.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen consecutive patients treated in our institution with PDT for local failure limited to within T2 without any metastases after definitive CRT performed between 1998 and 2008 were retrospectively enrolled. The complete response rate, adverse events, and survival outcomes were assessed and prognostic factors were investigated using a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The complete response rate was 58.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.3%-67.5%). The progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) rates at 5 years after salvage PDT were 22.1% (95% CI, 14.3%-30.0%) and 35.9% (95% CI, 26.7%-45.1%). N0 before CRT was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91, P = .020), whereas the impact of T1 or T2 before CRT on PFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.38-1.04, P = .068) and that of a longer period between CRT and PDT on OS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.39-1.05, P = .078) were marginal. The treatment-related death rate was 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage PDT was found to have a superior outcome and a satisfactory safety profile. An earlier clinical stage before CRT and a longer interval between CRT and PDT may be associated with a longer survival period.

A prospective, multicenter phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

Purpose

Standard care for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but survival remains limited. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) has demonstrated promising activity, with a pathological complete response (CR) of 17 % for resectable stage II/III ESCC. Here, we conducted a multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

Eligibility criteria included clinical T4 and/or M1 lymph node ESCC, PS 0–1 and age 20–70 years. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m² and cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m² on days 1–5, repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m² on days 64 and 92, and fluorouracil 700 mg/m² on days 64–67 and 92–95, concurrently with radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days/week). Primary endpoint of the phase II part was CR rate.

Results

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 88 %. Thirteen patients (39.4 %) achieved a CR. With a median follow-up period of 41 months (range 24–49 months), median progression-free survival was 12.2 months, and median survival was 26.0 months, with a survival rate of 40.4 % at 3 years. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia and dysphagia. No treatment-related death was observed.

Conclusion

Induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT is tolerable and shows promising efficacy for unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

Local efficacy and survival outcome of salvage endoscopic therapy for local recurrent lesions after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Salvage endoscopic therapy (SET), such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT), is a less-invasive treatment for local failure at the primary site after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted this retrospective study to clarify the risk factors for local recurrence along with the long term results after SET for recurrent lesions after definitive CRT for ESCC.

METHODS

We enrolled 77 consecutive patients who underwent EMR or PDT for local recurrence without any metastasis after definitive CRT at our institution. We evaluated the local efficacy, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and overall survival (OS), and investigated the risk factors associated with survival outcome using a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The complete resection rate of EMR was 84.6 % (33/39), and the complete response rate for PDT was 65.8 % (25/38). Twenty-two patients (28.6 %) exhibited local recurrence without metastasis. Thirty-four patients (44.2 %) were alive at 5 years after undergoing only initial SET or with repeated SET. The 5-year LRFS rate was 59.6 %, and the presence of lesions occupying an esophageal circumference of 1/4 or larger was the only significant risk factor (HR: 3.10, 95 % CI: 1.35-7.15, P = 0.008). The 5-year OS rate was 48.4 %, and an advanced T factor before CRT was marginally associated with a poor OS (HR: 1.96, 95 % CI: 0.98-3.92, P = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

SET enabled a preferable local control and survival outcome for patients with local recurrence after definitive CRT for ESCC. Careful endoscopic follow-up is needed for patients with a large lesion before SET and those with an advanced T factor before CRT.

Randomized Phase II Study of the Anti-inflammatory Effect of Ghrelin During the Postoperative Period of Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

A prospective randomized phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ghrelin administration in reducing systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) duration after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is highly invasive and leads to prolonged SIRS duration and postoperative complications. Ghrelin has multiple effects, including anti-inflammatory effects.

METHODS

Forty patients undergoing esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either the ghrelin group (n = 20), which received continuous infusion of ghrelin (0.5 μg/kg/h) for 5 days, or the placebo group (n = 20), which received pure saline for 5 days. The primary endpoint was SIRS duration. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of postoperative complications, time of a negative nitrogen balance, changes in body weight and composition, and levels of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6).

RESULTS

The ghrelin group had a shorter SIRS duration and lower CRP and IL-6 levels than did the placebo group. The incidence of pulmonary complications was lower in the ghrelin group than in the placebo group, whereas other complications did not differ between the groups. Although time of the negative nitrogen balance was shorter in the ghrelin group than in the placebo group, changes in total body weight and lean body weight did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative ghrelin administration was effective for inhibiting inflammatory mediators and improving the postoperative clinical course of patients with esophageal cancer.

Salvage Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Esophageal Cancer: Is It a Viable Therapeutic Option?

PURPOSE

The aim of this large multicenter study was to assess the impact of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (SALV) on clinical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from consecutive adult patients undergoing resection for esophageal cancer in 30 European centers from 2000 to 2010 were collected. First, groups undergoing SALV (n = 308) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by planned esophagectomy (NCRS; n = 540) were compared. Second, patients who benefited from SALV for persistent (n = 234) versus recurrent disease (n = 74) were compared. Propensity score matching and multivariable analyses were used to compensate for differences in some baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

SALV versus NCRS groups: In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (8.4% v 9.3%). The only significant differences in complications were seen for anastomotic leak (17.2% v 10.7%; P = .007) and surgical site infection, which were both more frequent in the SALV group. At 3 years, groups had similar overall (43.3% v 40.1%; P = .542) and disease-free survival (39.2% v 32.8%; P = .232) after matching, along with a similar recurrence pattern. Persistent versus recurrent disease groups: There were no significant differences between groups in incidence of in-hospital mortality or major complications. At 3 years, overall (40.9% v 56.2%; P = .046) and disease-free survival (36.6% v 51.6%; P = .095) were lower in the persistent disease group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this large multicenter study from the modern era suggest that SALV can offer acceptable short- and long-term outcomes in selected patients at experienced centers. Persistent cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy seems to be more biologically aggressive, with poorer survival compared with recurrent cancer.

Salvage Esophagectomy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Who Really Benefits from this High-Risk Surgery?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify good candidates for salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), based on safety and survival.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy, after dCRT, at the Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between 1988 and 2013, were retrospectively analyzed. Short-term outcomes were evaluated by reviewing postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and mortality. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was determined using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to R0 resection.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 41 patients (65.1 %), and the mortality rate was 7.9 %. In-hospital deaths did not occur among patients with less advanced tumors prior to dCRT (cT1-2 and cN0), or among those who had previously achieved a complete response (CR); the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 29.8 % and 15.0 %, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that residual disease, tumor depth, dCRT response, lymph node metastasis, and time to relapse were significant factors affecting overall survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that R0 resection and ypT0-2 tumors were significant, favorable prognostic factors in patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy. In addition, cT1-2 tumors, initially resectable tumors, ycT1-2 tumors, and relapse after CR were factors predicting R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on both short- and long-term outcomes, patients with pretreatment or preoperative T1-2 tumors and those with relapse after CR are good candidates for salvage esophagectomy.

[Salvage surgery in esophageal cancer : Feasibility in patients after definitive radiochemotherapy (> 50 Gy)]

BACKGROUND

Salvage surgery as an additional therapy option is currently discussed for an increasing number of patients with esophageal cancer after definitive radio(chemo)therapy after tumor progression, recurrence or on explicit request of the patient.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was an analysis of the surgical option of salvage esophagectomy after definitive radiation in patients with esophageal cancer. Additionally the current literature on this topic was evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 92 patients with esophageal cancer from a prospective database were included in this study who underwent esophagectomy either after neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (< 50 Gy) or definitive radio(chemo)therapy (> 50 Gy) between 2002 and 2012. The analysis was performed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median survival of the two groups of patients was not significantly different after initial diagnosis with 24.2 months (95 % CI 0.0-51.93) for patients undergoing definitive radio(chemo)therapy and 30.7 months (95 % CI 9.3-52.2) for patients after neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.96). Both patient groups showed no differences in pretherapeutic characteristics and response to radio(chemo)therapy. Postoperative complications and perioperative mortality were not different.

DISCUSSION

Salvage esophagectomy is now an additional treatment option after definitive radio(chemo)therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. In preselected patients with tumor recurrence, progression or with a strong wish for surgical therapy, salvage surgery should be discussed in interdisciplinary tumor boards after exclusion of distant metastases.

Involved-field irradiation concurrently combined with nedaplatin/5-fluorouracil for inoperable esophageal cancer on basis of (18)FDG-PET scans: a phase II study

PURPOSE

A prospective study was performed on chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer using involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) based on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography. The goal of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy of the IFRT procedure in newly diagnosed esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were adults with newly diagnosed untreated, inoperable esophageal cancer in stages I-IV with lymph node metastases. Patients received nedaplatin 80mg/m(2) per day on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 800mg/m(2) on days 1-4 intravenously repeated every 28days for 2-4 cycles, and combined IFRT. Elective nodal irradiation was not performed. Irradiation was applied only to the primary tumor and positive lymph nodes.

RESULTS

From September 2009 to July 2012, of the 63 patients enrolled, 58 were evaluable for response. The primary end point of isolated out-of-field loco-regional nodal recurrence was seen in only two patients. The expectant rate was assumed to be less than 5%. The threshold value was set as 10% to calculate the number of registrations. Progression-free and overall survival rates at 36months were 47.7% and 51.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 34.6months, and overall survival was 38.4months. Salvage surgery was tried for 11 patients (17.5%) due to residual or recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

The primary end point of the trial was demonstrated, indicating the efficacy of IFRT in the treatment of inoperable esophageal cancer mostly of squamous cell carcinoma.

Current management of esophageal cancer

Management of esophageal cancer has evolved since the two last decades. Esophagectomy remains the primary treatment for early stage esophageal cancer although its specific role in superficial cancers is still under debate since the development of endoscopic mucosal treatment. To date, there is strong evidence to consider that locally advanced cancers should be recommended for a multimodal treatment with a neoadjuvant chemotherapy or a combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. For locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma or for a part of adenocarcinoma, some centers have proposed treating with definitive CRT to avoid related-mortality of surgery. In case of persistent or recurrent disease, a salvage esophagectomy remains a possible option but this procedure is associated with higher levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Despite the debate over what constitutes the best surgical approach (transthoracic versus transhiatal), the current question is if a minimally procedure could reduce the periopertive morbidity and mortality without jeopardizing the oncological results of surgery. Since the last decade, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) or hybrid operations are being done in up to 30% of procedures internationally. There are some consistent data that MIE could decrease the incidence of the respiratory complications and decrease the length of hospital-stay. Nowadays, oncologic outcomes appear equivalent between open and minimally invasive procedures but numerous phase III trials are ongoing.

Salvage esophagectomy

Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer are treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCXRT) for a number of reasons. Some patients are never referred to a surgeon for a con-versation about surgery, others decline surgery, and some are not candidates for surgery due to a sag in performance status secondary to therapy. Regardless of method of arrival at dCXRT, the risk of local/regional recurrence during follow-up is significant. Many of these patients are faced with limited options for therapy once dCXRT has failed. Salvage esoph-agectomy has historically been considered a morbid procedure and poor choice for lo-cal/regional recurrence. This chapter reviews the recent literature arguing the relevance of salvage resection. We recommend that any patient suffering from persistent or recurrent lo-cal/regional only disease after dCXRT should be referred to an experienced esophageal center to consider surgical options.

Prognostic analysis of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of lymphadenectomy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to review the prognostic factors for increased survival after salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous carcinoma and determine the importance of lymphadenectomy from a prognostic view.

METHODS

Clinical data for all patients from January 1999 to December 2012 who underwent salvage esophagectomy for residual tumor or tumor recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively collected. Survival was determined and prognostic factors were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Survival after 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively was 74.4%, 39.8%, and 29.5%, respectively. The independent predictive factors for increased postoperative survival were tumor recurrence rather than residual tumor as the indication for salvage surgery (P < .001; odds ratio [OR], 0.292); complete tumor resection (P < .001; OR, 4.520); N category (P = .089; OR, 1.304); M category (P = .081; OR, 2.215), and total mediastinal dissection with 15 or more dissected mediastinal lymph nodes (P = .034; OR, 0.546).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage indications of recurrence, earlier disease, and complete tumor resection are related to longer survival. The total area of mediastinal dissection with a sufficient number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes improves survival. Additional neck dissection does not add benefit. The optimal procedure for lymph node dissection in salvage esophagectomy should be established in future studies.

Assessment of short-term clinical outcomes following salvage esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal malignancy: systematic review and pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined chemoradiotherapy is increasingly being used as definitive treatment for locoregional esophageal malignancy. Patients with residual or recurrent localized cancer are often selectively considered for salvage esophagectomy (SALV). The aim of this pooled analysis was to compare short-term clinical outcomes from SALV following definitive chemoradiotherapy with those from planned esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRS).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists were searched for relevant comparative studies. Primary outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, negative (R0) resection margin, and estimated blood loss.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 954 patients; 242 (SALV) and 712 (NCRS) were included. SALV was associated with a significantly increased incidence of post-operative mortality (9.50 vs. 4.07 %; pooled odds ratio [POR] = 3.02; p < 0.001), anastomotic leak (23.97 vs. 14.47 %; POR = 1.99; p = 0.005), pulmonary complications (29.75 vs. 16.99 %; POR = 2.12; p < 0.001), and an increased length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference = 8.29 days; 95 % CI 7.08-9.5; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of negative resection margins or estimated blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

SALV has poorer short-term outcomes when compared with planned esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients and multidisciplinary tumor boards should be made aware of these differences in outcomes and SALV should be reserved for practice in high-volume institutions.

Esophagectomy after chemoradiation: who and when to operate

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer. After completion of chemoradiotherapy, deciding which patients benefit from surgery remains a challenge. For patients who decide on surgery, the optimal timing is unknown. The complexity of these questions requires an individualized approach, taking into account the expertise of the surgeon, the condition of the patient, and the biology of the tumor.

[Definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: 66Gy versus 50Gy, a retrospective study]

PURPOSE

To compare the influence of radiation dose, high dose versus standard dose, on survival for patients with esophageal carcinomas treated with definitive radiochemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2006, 143 consecutive patients with squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, clinical stage I to IVA, treated in two different institutions were retrospectively reviewed, 83 patients had received more than 50.4Gy, median dose 66Gy (50.7-72Gy) and 60 less than or equal to 50.4Gy, median dose 50Gy (38-50.4Gy).

RESULTS

Median age was higher in high dose group (67.6 versus 61.7 years). Nutritional status and stage were better in high dose group with a lower weight loss (5.1 versus 7.9%), a higher body mass index (25.7 versus 22.9), more N0 patients (60.2 versus 31.7%) and less stage III (27.7 versus 63.3%). Median follow up was 20.8 months (2.8-92.4 months), and 64.9 months (4.2-92.4 months) for the 33 surviving patients. No statistically significant difference was shown for local/locoregional control, disease-free survival. Overall survival at 2-, 3- and 5-year and median survival was respectively 44.7%, 36.8%, 19.1% and 21.2 months in high dose group and 50.8%, 31.6%, 20.7% and 24.6 months in standard dose group (P=0.9).

CONCLUSION

No difference was found between the two groups in terms of local/distant control and overall survival. A prospective randomised study is needed.

Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy at the dose of 50.4 Gy with elective nodal irradiation for Stage II-III esophageal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Definitive chemoradiotherapy is one of the curative options for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with organ preservation. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy at a dose of 50.4 Gy concurrent with chemotherapy for Stage II-III esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Esophageal cancer patients with clinical Stage II-III (T1N1M0 or T2-3N0-1M0) were eligible. Radiotherapy was administered to a total dose of 50.4 Gy with elective nodal irradiation of 41.4 Gy. Concurrent chemotherapy comprised two courses of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/day) on days 1-4 and 2-h infusion of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on Day 1; this was repeated every 4 weeks. Two courses of 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin were added.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study from June 2006 to May 2008. The characteristics of the 51 patients enrolled were as follows: median age 64 years; male/female, 45/6; performance status 0/1, 32/19 patients; Stage IIA/IIB/III, 9/20/22 patients, respectively. A complete response was achieved in 36 patients (70.6%). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rate was 88.2 and 63.8%, respectively. The median 1- and 3-year progression-free survival rate was 66.7% (80% CI: 57-74%) and 56.6% (80% CI: 47.1-64.9%), respectively. Acute toxicities included Grade 3/4 anorexia (45%), esophagitis (35%) and febrile neutropenia (20%). Eight patients (15.6%) underwent salvage surgery due to residual or recurrent disease. There were no deaths related to salvage surgery.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiation therapy at a dose of 50.4 Gy with elective nodal irradiation is promising with a manageable tolerability profile in esophageal cancer patients.

Comparison of salvage chemoradiation versus salvage surgery for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone

A consensus treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who recur after definitive radiochemotherapy/radiotherapy has not been established. This study compared the outcomes in ESCC patients who underwent salvage surgery, salvage chemoradiation (CRT) or best supportive care (BSC) for local recurrence. Ninety-five patients with clinical stage I to III ESCC who had completely responded to the initial definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone and developed local recurrence were enrolled in this study. Fifty-one of them received salvage esophagectomy, and R0 resection was performed in 41 patients, 36 underwent salvage CRT, and the remaining eight patients received BSC only. The 5-year overall survival was 4.6% for the 87 patients receiving salvage surgery or CRT, while all patients in the BSC group died within 12.0 months, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.018). The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates in the salvage surgery and salvage CRT groups were 45.1%, 20.0%, 6.9% and 51.7%, 12.2%, 3.1%, respectively, there was no difference of overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.697). Patients also presented with lymph node relapse had inferior survival compared to those with isolated local tumor recurrence after salvage therapy. In the salvage surgery group, infections occurred in eight patients, and three developed anastomotic leakage. In the salvage CRT group, grade 2-4 esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis was observed in 19 and 3 patients, respectively. Seven patients (19.4%) developed esophagotracheal fistula or esophageal perforation. This study of salvage CRT versus salvage surgery for recurrent ESCC after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone did not demonstrate a statistically significant survival difference, but the frequency of complications including esophagotracheal fistula and esophageal perforation following salvage CRT was high.

Salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy is associated with high local treatment failure rates, and surgical resection may be an appropriate salvage therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of salvage esophagectomy have not been elucidated fully. The clinical outcomes of salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy were assessed.

METHODS

Twelve patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy between January 2003 and November 2010 were included in this retrospective analysis. Baseline demographics and survivals of these patients were compared with 21 patients who did not receive salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure only after chemoradiotherapy, identified from our own previous prospective trials.

RESULTS

The median age was 62.5 years (range 50 to 69) and all patients had squamous cell carcinoma. The median radiation dose was 54.0 Gy (range 41.4 to 66.0) and the median interval between completion of chemoradiation and surgery was 8.0 months (range 2.0 to 32.9). There were no in-hospital deaths. Pulmonary complication was the most common postoperative morbidity (42%), and anastomotic leakage occurred in 1 patient (8%). With a median follow-up period of 29.3 months (range 5.8 to 73.0), the overall 3-year survival rate was 58%. Patients with early pathologic stage disease (T1/2 and N0) showed significantly prolonged survival (p=0.03) compared with those with advanced pathologic stage (T3/T4 or N1). Patients with salvage esophagectomy had prolonged event-free survival and overall survival compared with those patients with locoregional failure who received primary chemotherapy or boost radiotherapy (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy should be employed with great caution, it appears to be a feasible and effective therapeutic option for highly selected patients, especially with early pathologic stage disease. Salvage esophagectomy can be recommended as the only current curative treatment option for patients with locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy.