Clinical relevance of induction triplet chemotherapy for esophageal cancer invading adjacent organs

Perforated Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal perforation in the setting of malignancy is a surgical emergency for which there is little direct evidence in the literature to guide treatment. Instead, treatment is based on a combination of our understanding of managing benign esophageal perforations and a contemporary understanding of the treatment and prognosis of esophageal cancer. Due to the numerous challenges of managing perforated esophageal cancer, incorporating clinicians with expertise in esophageal cancer, advanced endoscopy, and esophageal surgery into shared decision-making discussions with patients and their families is essential.

Camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the conversion of locally advanced unresectable oesophageal squamous carcinoma: protocol for a two-arm, open-label phase II trial

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal cancer (OC) has higher morbidity and mortality rate than most other malignancies. The standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with tumour regression observed in a proportion of patients after treatment, but prognostic improvement remains limited. Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy (CT) has been shown to be efficacious as the first-line treatment of advanced OC and neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, two-arm, randomised, unblinded phase II study to explore the efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with CT versus chemoradiotherapy for the conversion of unresectable advanced OSCC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be enrolled after signing an informed consent form. Patients with clinically cT4b or spread to at least one group of lymph nodes with possible invasion of surrounding organs and unresectable locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the thoracic segment of the oesophagus will be included in the study. Patients with suspected distant metastases on the preoperative examination will be excluded from this study. Patients eligible for enrolment will be grouped by centre randomisation according to the study plan. Patients will undergo radical surgery after completion of two cycles of chemotherapy (CT) combined with camrelizumab induction therapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy if assessed to be operable. Patients evaluated as inoperable will be scheduled for a multidisciplinary consultation to determine the next treatment option. The primary endpoint is the R0 resection rate in patients undergoing surgery after treatment. Secondary endpoints are the rate of major pathological remission, pathological complete response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events for all patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committees of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (No. 2022YF039-02). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05821452.

Impact of MRI on the post-therapeutic diagnosis of T4 esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Opportunities for T4b esophageal cancer patients to receive curative surgery are increasing with the development of multidisciplinary treatments. However, the best modality to accurately diagnose infiltration to the organs surrounding T4b esophageal cancer is still unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the performance of CT and MRI in diagnosing T stage in T4b esophageal cancer, with reference to the pathological diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective medical records review of patients with T4b esophageal cancer patients from January 2017 to December 2021 was conducted. Among 125 patients who were treated for cT4b esophageal cancer in Osaka University Hospital, 30 patients were diagnosed with cT4b esophageal cancer by CT, ycT staging with CT (contrast-enhanced images) and MRI (T2-FSE images), and curative R0 resection was performed. Preoperative MRI staging was independently performed by two experienced radiologists. The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI were examined using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Nineteen and 12 patients were diagnosed with ycT4b by CT and MRI, respectively. Combined T4b organ resection was performed in 15 patients. A pathological diagnosis of ypT4b was made in 11 cases. In comparison to CT, MRI showed a higher diagnostic performance, specificity (47% vs. 89%, p = 0.013), and accuracy (60% vs. 90%, p = 0.015) for CT vs. MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results-with reference to the pathological diagnosis-revealed that MRI had a superior diagnostic performance to CT for diagnosing T4b esophageal cancer invading the surrounding organs. An accurate diagnosis of T4b esophageal cancer may facilitate the implementation of appropriate treatment strategies.

Long-term survival and prognostic factors associated with curative conversion surgery for ct4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of 200 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for cT4b esophageal cancer has not been established yet. Although curative surgery is sometimes performed after induction treatments, the prognostic factor of cT4b esophageal cancer cases who underwent R0 resection remains unknown.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients with cT4b esophageal cancer who underwent R0 resection after induction treatments between 2001 and 2020 in our institute were included in the present study. The relationship between clinicopathological factors and patient survival is evaluated to identify useful prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median and 2-year overall survival were 40.1 months and 62.8%, respectively. Disease recurrence occurred in 98 (49%) patients after surgery. Compared to induction chemotherapy alone, chemoradiation-based induction treatments were associated with decreased locoregional recurrence (34.0% vs 60.8%, P = .0077) but increased pulmonary metastases (27.7% vs 9.8%, P = .0210) and dissemination (19.1% vs 3.9%, P = .0139) after surgery. Multivariate analysis of overall survival identified the preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (hazard ratio 1.7957, P = .0031), response to induction treatments (hazard ratio 2.9663, P = .0009), postoperative pneumonia (hazard ratio 2.3784, P = .0010), and pN (2-3) (hazard ratio 1.5693, P = .0355) as independent prognostic factors. Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (hazard ratio 1.6760, P = .0068) and postoperative pneumonia (hazard ratio 1.8365, P = .0200) were also independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Curative surgery after induction therapy for cT4b esophageal cancer achieved favorable survival. Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, postoperative pneumonia, response to induction treatments, and pN were useful prognostic factors.

Chemoradiotherapy versus triplet chemotherapy as initial therapy for T4b esophageal cancer: survival results from a multicenter randomized Phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

We report the long-term results as primary endpoint in a multicentre randomized prospective Phase 2 trial which compared chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and triplet chemotherapy (CT) as the initial therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in T4b esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

Patients with T4b EC were randomly assigned to the CRT group or CT group as initial treatment. CS was performed if resectable after initial or secondary treatment. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival, analysed by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 43.8 months. The 2-year survival rate was higher in the CRT group (55.1%; 95% CI: 41.1-68.3%) compared to the CT group (34.7%; 95% CI: 22.8-48.9%), although the difference was not significant (P = 0.11). Local and regional lymph node recurrence in patients undergoing R0 resection was significantly higher in the CT group compared to the CRT group (local: 30% versus 8%, respectively, P = 0.03; regional: 37% versus 8%, respectively, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront CT was not superior to upfront CRT as induction therapy for T4b EC in terms of 2-year survival and was significantly inferior to upfront CRT in terms of local and regional control.

REGISTRATION

The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).

Planned oesophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy versus salvage oesophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Salvage oesophagectomies are associated with an increased risk of mortality, although recent data suggests that long-term survival rates following salvage oesophagectomy are similar to planned oesophagectomy. The aim was therefore to meta-analyse outcomes for patients undergoing salvage versus planned oesophagectomies to assess the differences in short-term mortality and long-term survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted and compared by meta-analysis, using odds ratio and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, which compared patients in the planned oesophagectomy group (n = 23 555) to patients in the salvage oesophagectomy group (n = 2227). There were significant differences between the groups in terms of rates of postoperative mortality (5.7% salvage oesophagectomy versus 3.1% planned oesophagectomy, P = 0.0004), anastomotic leak (20.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 14.5% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.00001), pulmonary complications (37.1% salvage oesophagectomy versus 24.2% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001) and R0 margin (87.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 91.3% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between long-term survival rates at 5 years with 39.2% for salvage and 42.6% for planned oesophagectomy (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage oesophagectomies do offer a meaningful chance of long-term survival (at 5 years) for select patients with oesophageal cancer, but the elevated risk of post-operative complications and mortality following salvage oesophagectomy should be recognized.

Multimodal Treatment Strategies to Improve the Prognosis of Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy and sixth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with aortic or tracheal invasion is considered unresectable, and has an extremely poor prognosis; its standard treatment is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). In recent years, induction chemotherapy (ICT) has been reported to yield high response rates for locally advanced ESCC, and the efficacy and safety of ICT followed by conversion surgery (CS) have been investigated. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) or ICT, is necessary to improve ESCC prognosis. CS is generally performed for locally advanced ECC after ICRT or ICT when tumor downstaging is achieved, although its prognostic benefit remains controversial. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted a three-arm phase III randomized controlled trial (JCOG1510) to confirm the superiority of DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) ICT, over conventional dCRT, among patients with initially unresectable ESCC. In recent years, researchers have reported favorable outcomes of induction therapy followed by CS and salvage surgery, after dCRT or systemic immunochemotherapy. In this review, we will describe the latest developments in the multimodal treatment including chemotherapy, CRT, surgery, and immunotherapy, which may improve oncological and survival outcomes for patients with cT4 ESCC.

Risk factors and prognosis for esophageal fistula in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma during radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine risk factors, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors for esophageal fistula (EF) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) during radiotherapy.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2018, 109 patients with EF during radiotherapy were retrospectively collected. A controlled cohort including 416 patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy without EF was used to compare risk factors and survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of EF. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that sex, body mass index, alcohol history, esophageal ulceration, primary tumor length, T stage, and absolute lymphocyte count were independent risk factors for EF. After PSM, patients with EF showed remarkably worse prognosis than those without EF (median overall survival: 13.0 versus 20.5 months; P = 0.009). For patients with EF, serum albumin level (≥ 35 g/L), subsequent radiotherapy, and fistula closure were associated with significantly prolonged survival. In addition, esophageal-mediastinum fistula and subsequent radiotherapy were positive predictors for fistula closure.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified risk factors for radiotherapy-related EF and its unfavorable prognosis in patients with ESCC. Of them, patients with serum albumin level of ≥ 35 g/L, subsequent radiotherapy after EF, and fistula closure had a more favorable survival.

Survival rates and safety associated with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and chemoradiotherapy alone for patients with T4 esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment approach for T4 esophageal cancer is not well established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the survival rates and safety of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S) and chemoradiotherapy alone (CRT) in patients with T4 N_any M0 esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched databases for eligible prospective or retrospective studies. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) at 1, 3 and 5 years, treatment-related fistula formation and mortality rates. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects models separately for studies evaluating CRT-S and CRT. Subgroup analyses were performed based on histology, radiation dose, chemotherapy regimen and duration of the interval between CRT and surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 23 studies including 1,119 patients with predominantly squamous cell carcinoma (93%) and adenocarcinoma (3%) histology. The OS rates of patients receiving CRT-S were 65%, 36% and 20% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The OS rates of patients receiving CRT were 30%, 11% and 10% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Treatment-related fistula formation rates were 4% for CRT-S and 9% for CRT. Treatment-related mortality rates were 3% for both groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the interval of >2 months between CRT and surgery was associated with significantly improved OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy is an efficacious treatment approach for T4 esophageal cancer, with clinically acceptable rates of treatment-related fistula formation and mortality. Tri-modality approach with surgery can be considered in carefully selected patients. Our study findings should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Surgical strategies for treatment of clinical T4 esophageal cancer in Japan

Definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) is the mainstay treatment for cStage IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with good performance status (PS), according to standard practice guidelines. Salvage surgery may incur operation complications and risk of mortality. According to the esophageal cancer practice guidelines outlined by the Japan Esophageal Society, when a tumor is residual and recurrent, chemotherapy and palliative symptomatic treatment is continued. However, salvage operation has been selected as a therapeutic option for recurrent or residual tumors after dCRT. There is weak evidence for not recommending surgery for cStage IVa ESCC exhibiting residual disease following dCRT. It has been reported that during salvage surgery the only prognostic factor that is thought to be performed is complete resection (R0), but at the same time, salvage esophagectomy increases the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. The phase II chemoselection study by Yokota T et al. in Japan showed that multidisciplinary treatment initiated by induction therapy, in which docetaxel is added to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, resulted in a good prognosis in the short term. In this review, we discuss the surgical strategy and future of unresectable clinical T4 (cT4) ESCC.

Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events (AEs).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival.

RESULTS

In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). AEs including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and AEs. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).

Chemotherapy alone versus definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cT4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study

Background

The role of radiotherapy for cT4bNanyM0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESqCC) is relatively unclear, with both chemotherapy (C/T) alone and definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) being treatment options in the current guidelines. We aimed to compare the survival of dCCRT versus C/T for these patients via a population-based approach.

Methods

Eligible cT4b ESqCC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We used propensity score (PS) weighting to balance the observable potential confounders between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of death and incidence of esophageal cancer mortality (IECM) were compared between dCCRT and C/T. We also evaluated OS in subgroups of either low or standard radiotherapy doses.

Results

Our primary analysis consisted of 247 patients in whom covariates were well balanced after PS weighing. The HR for death when dCCRT was compared with C/T was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.24–0.53, P < 0.001). Similar results were found for IECM. Statistical significance was only observed in the standard RT dose but not in the low dose in subgroup analyses.

Conclusions

In this population-based nonrandomized study of cT4bNanyM0 ESqCC patients from Asia (Taiwan), we found that the use of radiotherapy with chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival than chemotherapy alone. Further studies (especially RCTs) are needed to confirm our findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01742-4.

High incidence of esophageal fistula on patients with clinical T4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) being a recommended therapeutic method for patients with T4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), treatment response and complications remain unclear. Esophageal fistula is a severe CRT-related complication when treating locally advanced ESCC, but data on risk factors that lead to esophageal fistula formation are limited. The aim of this analysis is to characterize the outcomes of T4b ESCC treated by CRT and investigate the risk factors of esophageal fistula.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 136 patients with clinically unresectable T4b ESCC who were treated with CRT. Response, survival, and complication rates, particularly the rate of esophageal fistula and its associated risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 7.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.1-9.7) and 12.2 months (95% [CI]: 8.9-15.4), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 29.9% and 20.2%, respectively. The incidence rate of esophageal fistulas was 30.1%. The median OS for patients with esophageal fistula was only 6.9 (95%[CI] = 6.0-7.8) months. The risk for developing esophageal fistulas was significantly high for ulcerative-type tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 3.202; 95%[CI] = 1.036-7.850, P = 0.011) and for those invading the bronchus/trachea (OR = 3.378; 95%[CI] = 1.223-9.332, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that CRT for T4b ESCC patients has a curative potential, despite a high incidence of esophageal fistula, which was the main cause of treatment failure. The higher risk for fistula formation were tumors with ulceration or bronchus/trachea invasion.

Fistulas between the Esophagus and Adjacent Vital Organs in Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal fistulas may occur in an advanced stage or as a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment. They can be divided into esophageal-respiratory and esophageal-aorta fistulas. The diagnosis is confirmed with fluoroscopy using dilute barium oral contrast, followed by thin-section computed tomography, which defines the precise location and extent of the fistula. Flexible esophagoscopy and bronchoscopy are required for confirmation and anatomic assessment of the suspected fistula and provide additional information for treatment planning. Contamination is traditionally controlled by surgical exclusion, along with a jejunal feeding tube. Currently, fully covered self-expanding metal stents are the primary treatment option.

The Pattern of Residual Tumor After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer and Its Clinical Significance

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the residual pattern of esophageal cancer in the esophageal wall after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and its clinical significance.

BACKGROUND

NAC is a standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer; however, residual tumor patterns in resected specimens after NAC and their clinico-pathological characteristics remain unknown.

METHODS

One hundred twenty consecutive patients with cT3 or deeper esophageal cancer underwent curative esophagectomy after NAC and achieved grade 2 histological responses between 2000 and 2016. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of residual tumor sections revealed 4 remnant categories: Type 1: shallow, Type 2: central, Type 3: deep, and Type 4: diffuse. We examined associations between these Types and clinico-pathological factors, including prognosis.

RESULTS

Forty-five (38%) specimens had no residual tumor cells in the mucosal layer. The adventitia layer displayed the lowest residual tumor cell frequency (18%) among all layers. Types 1, 2, 3, and 4 residual tumor patterns were found in 49 (41%), 33 (28%), 9 (8%), and 29 (24%) patients, respectively. Type 4 showed the maximum standard uptake value after NAC; Types 3 and 4 had higher ratios of venous invasion than Type 1 or 2. Patients with Type 3 or 4 more frequently developed pleural dissemination or distant metastasis than patients with Type 1 or 2. Survival was similar among the 4 Types.

CONCLUSIONS

After NAC for locally advanced esophageal cancer, the shallow residual tumor pattern was most common, but approximately 40% of specimens showed no tumor cells in the mucosal layer. Deep and diffuse remnant patterns were associated with high risks of pleural dissemination and distant metastasis.

Tracheal resection and anterior mediastinal tracheostomy in the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion

Combined tracheal resection and anterior mediastinal tracheostomy (AMT) for esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion is a challenging treatment because of its high morbidity and the lack of evidence regarding long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of AMT as part of the multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion. This retrospective study included 27 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion who underwent combined tracheal resection and AMT in their multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer. We evaluated postoperative complications, body weight loss, and survival and examined the prognostic value of preoperative factors. All patients underwent chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy as prior treatment. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. Clavien-Dindo grade I or greater complications occurred in 17 patients (63%), and grade III or greater complications occurred in 12 (44%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 4%, with one patient dying on postoperative day 48 when the brachiocephalic artery ruptured from tracheal compression. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0% and 4%, respectively. Median weight change in patients without recurrence in the year after surgery was -1.7% (-9.6-21%). All of these patients received nutrition by oral intake and were living independently at home without public assistance. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 25.9% and 18.5%, respectively; 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 38.6% and 25.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified response to prior treatment as an independent prognostic factor in these patients. Combined tracheal resection and AMT may be adapted as part of the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion. Improving AMT safety and optimizing patient selection may improve prognosis among patients with this cancer.

Risk Factors Associated with Esophageal Fistula after Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy to guide how to reduce the occurrence of esophageal fistula (EF).

Methods: 414 patients with ESCC who underwent RT with or without chemotherapy were collected in Shandong Cancer Hospital from February 2012 to June 2018 retrospectively. The clinical characters and dosimetric parameters were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were provided to determine the risk factors associated with EF.

Results: The cumulative incidences of EF were 11.1% (46/414 patients). The median follow-up period was 15.8 months (range: 0.2-82.6months). The median survival time (MST) of patients with EF was 5.3 months. In univariate analysis, age, T4 stage, N3 stage, chemotherapy regimens, re-RT, ulcerative esophageal cancer (EC), esophageal stenosis, the maximum thickness of the tumor and the length of tumor had a correlation with the prevalence of EF. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, T4 stage, N3 stage, re-RT, ulcerative EC, esophageal stenosis, the maximum thickness of the tumor was confirmed as risk factors for EF.

Conclusion: This study revealed that T4 stage, N3 stage, re-RT, ulcerative EC, esophageal stenosis, the maximum thickness of the tumor were risk factors associated with EF. We ought to attach importance to the prevention of EF. Patients with risk factors for EF should be paid close attention.

Analysis of fistula formation of T4 esophageal cancer patients treated by chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fistula is one of the known complications of T4 esophageal cancer (T4-EC). The standard treatment for T4-EC is chemoradiotherapy, but detailed data about fistula resulting from chemoradiotherapy in this condition are limited. In particular, radiographic findings of T4-EC with fistula have not been reported. This study assessed the risk factors of fistula based on clinical information on patients with chemoradiotherapy for T4-EC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 59 T4-EC patients who had squamous cell carcinoma without any fistula before receiving definitive or palliative chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

A fistula was observed in 18 patients (31%) throughout their clinical course. The overall survival in the fistula group was significantly shorter than that in the non-fistula group (259 vs. 346 days; p = 0.0341). The axial tumor size on computed tomography (CT) was confirmed as an independent risk factor for esophageal fistula in multivariate analysis of stepwise methods [OR 1.226; 95% CI 1.109-1.411; p < 0.0001]. Twelve out of 14 patients with an axial tumor size of 50 mm or greater had developed a fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

A large tumor size on the axial plane on CT is a risk factor for fistula formation.

Feasibility of extended chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cT4b esophageal carcinoma usually consists of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, outcome after dCRT in these patients is poor. Whether surgery should have a place in the treatment of cT4b esophageal cancer is still subject to debate. Goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of esophagectomy after extended chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT4b esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma, as determined by endoscopic ultrasound and (PET-)CT, were eligible for this phase-2 study. Patients were treated with weekly carboplatin + paclitaxel with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy in 28 fractions for 5.5 weeks followed by an explorative thoracotomy and esophagectomy if deemed feasible.

RESULTS

From July 2011 through March 2013, 16 patients were enrolled. Five patients did not undergo surgery because of detection of distant metastases during/after CRT (n = 3), unwillingness to undergo surgery (n = 1) or death before start of CRT (n = 1). Of the 13 patients who completed CRT, 3 patients experienced major hematologic toxicity (grade 3). A radical (R0) resection was achieved in 9 of 11 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients. A reoperation was performed in 2 patients and 2 patients died in hospital after surgery. Three patients developed recurrent disease (1 locoregional and 2 systemic) after a mean interval of 17 months. Median overall survival of all included patients was 14.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In certain patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma a radical resection can be accomplished after chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment is associated with considerable complications and should therefore be reserved for physically fit patients.

NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER

NTR3060.

The Benefits of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Induction Therapy in Conversion to Curative Treatment for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), used for treatment of patients with an initial diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, has led to unsatisfactory long-term prognosis. Moreover, CRT can lead to esophageal fistula, perforation, and strictures. Therefore, strong induction chemotherapeutic treatments are necessary to reduce the tumor volume for subsequent radical esophagectomy. This study aimed to determine the oncological utility of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) and the technical feasibility of subsequent esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with clinical borderline unresectable T3 and T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without distant metastases were included in this study. There were 44 patients in primary DCF group and 43 patients in definitive CRT group, and perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (50%) achieved R0 resection in the DCF group. Albeit not significant, the rate of curative treatment was higher in the DCF group than the definitive CRT group (p = 0.099). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were better with DCF than with definitive CRT (median OS, 29 vs. 17 months, p = 0.206; median PFS, 10 vs. 6 months, p = 0.020). Specifically, the OS of patients with a Charlson score of less than 3 among the DCF-treated patients tended to be better than those among the definitive CRT-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

DCF and subsequent esophagectomy achieved R0 resection in 50% of the patients and was associated with better long-term oncological outcomes in patients with initially unresectable esophageal cancer if their systemic status is acceptable.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Weekly Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as Induction or Palliative Treatment in Advanced Esophageal Cancer Patients

Many patients have advanced esophageal cancer at diagnosis. However, the most optimal treatment has not been identified. Therefore, we evaluated a weekly regimen of carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC)) of 4 and paclitaxel at 100 mg/m² as an induction or palliative treatment. All patients with advanced (gastro)esophageal cancer treated with this regimen between 2002-2018 were included. Exclusion criteria were previous radiotherapy or treatment elsewhere. Data on toxicity, response, and survival were collected. Analyses were performed in two groups: induction (iCT) or palliative chemotherapy (pCT). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 291 patients was included (iCT: 122; pCT: 169). Most patients had T3 carcinoma (iCT: 54%; pCT: 66%) and stage IV disease (iCT: 42%; pCT: 91%). A toxicity grade ≥3 occurred mainly as hematological toxicity (iCT: 71%; pCT: 73%) and gastrointestinal toxicity (iCT: 3%; pCT: 5%). Response rates were 48% (iCT) and 44% (pCT). Esophagectomy or definitive chemoradiotherapy followed in 42% of iCT, resulting in a PFS of 22.1 months (interquartile range (IQR): 12.4-114.2) and OS of 26.8 months (IQR: 15.4-91.7). For pCT, PFS was 8.2 months (IQR: 5.1-14.5) and OS 10.9 months (IQR: 6.5-18.3). This retrospective cohort study demonstrated that weekly carboplatin (AUC4) and paclitaxel (100 mg/m²) is a well-tolerated and effective induction or palliative treatment regimen for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Future research should directly compare this treatment regimen with other first-line treatment options to determine its true value for clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective nonrandomized trial for short-term outcomes

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) significantly extends survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the short-term outcomes for cT4 ESCC remain controversial. Many NAC regimens have been previously reported, although no study has reported a regimen of irinotecan and nedaplatin for cT4 potential resectable ESCC. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC. A total of 51 patients with cT4 potentially resectable ESCC were eligible for this study. Twenty of these patients underwent NAC, and the other 31 patients underwent surgery alone. The toxicities and response of NAC were evaluated. The clinicopathologic characteristics, responses, toxicities, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and survival time between the two groups were analyzed. No significant differences were found in clinicopathologic characteristics between the groups (P > 0.05). The response rate of NAC was 75% (15/20). The differences in the long-axis diameter of the tumor and cT stage between pre- and post-NAC were significant (P < 0.05). Twenty-four toxic events occurred in 11 patients of the NAC group, and 20/24 of these were mild. The R0 resection rates in the NAC group and the surgery alone group were 85% and 64.5%, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Differences in the pathological T stage and pathological tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were significant (P < 0.05). The overall survival (OS) time and mortality in the NAC group versus the surgery alone group were 31.57 ± 3.06 months versus 15.24 ± 1.46 months and 25% versus 61.3%, respectively. The differences in OS and mortality were significant (P < 0.05). The NAC group and R0 resection were significant and independent predictors of positive prognosis. NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC as a new NAC is safe and effective.

Treatment and clinical outcome of clinical T4 esophageal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with cT4 esophageal cancer is dismal. Although the optimal treatment strategy remains to be established, two treatment options are available for cT4 esophageal cancers: definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) and induction treatment followed by conversion surgery (CS). However, little is known concerning the differences in clinical outcome between patients with T4 esophageal tumors treated with dCRT and those eventually treated with CS.

METHODS

A systematic search of the scientific literature on PubMed/MEDLINE was carried out using the keywords "T4 esophageal cancer," "invading (involving) adjacent organ," "definitive chemoradiation," "induction therapy," "salvage surgery," and "conversion surgery," obtaining 28 reports published up to July 2018.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

We found that CS was superior to dCRT with respect to local disease control and short-term survival; however, CS was associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality and morbidity. Alternatively, although dCRT might often cause fistula formation, a clinical complete response to dCRT is likely to lead to a better prognosis. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents have led to triple induction chemotherapy, with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), which has shown promise as an initial induction treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer. Indeed, this regimen could control both local and systemic disease, which enables curative resection without preoperative CRT. Moreover, some appropriate changes in perioperative management and intensive systemic chemotherapy might enhance patient outcome. Randomized controlled trials with a large sample size are needed to establish the standard treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Association between Paclitaxel Clearance and Tumor Response in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Inter-individual variability in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics may play a role in the response to chemotherapy. Therefore, we studied the association between paclitaxel clearance and treatment response in patients with esophageal cancer. All patients who received paclitaxel (plus carboplatin) treatment for esophageal cancer between 2007 and 2013 were included. The treatment was given as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), induction chemotherapy (iCT), or palliative chemotherapy (pCT). The treatment response was assessed by the tumor regression grade (TRG) or by the RECIST1.1 criteria, respectively. The unbound paclitaxel clearance (CL) was estimated with NONMEM. The log-transformed clearance was related to response with ANOVA and independent sample t-tests. A total of 166 patients were included, of whom 113 received nCRT, 23 iCT and 30 pCT. In patients receiving nCRT, paclitaxel clearance was not associated with tumor regression grade (p-value = 0.25), nor with pathologically complete response (geometric mean 561.6 L/h) and residual disease (geometric mean 566.1 L/h, p-value = 0.90). In patients who underwent iCT or pCT, also no association between paclitaxel clearance and RECIST outcome was identified (iCT: p-value = 0.08 and pCT: p-value = 0.81, respectively). In conclusion, systemic paclitaxel exposure was not associated with response to common paclitaxel-based treatment regimens for esophageal cancer. Future studies should focus on tumor exposure in relation to systemic exposure and treatment outcome.

Postoperative Complication Assessments of Different Reconstruction Procedures after Total Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: Tubular Gastric Pull-Up versus Whole Gastric Pull-Up

Hypopharynx carcinoma tends to be diagnosed at advanced stage and usually has a poor prognosis because of the high incidence of submucosal spreading and lymphatic metastasis. Total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (PLE) is mostly used as a curative intervention for this deadly disease, and a commonly used reconstruction method after PLE is gastric pull-up, which could be further divided into tubular gastric pull-up and whole gastric pull-up procedures. Aiming to achieve a precise guidance on optimal reconstruction method after PLE, the present study evaluated the postoperative complications involving in different gastric pull-up procedures in patients with hypopharynx cancer. A total of 52 consecutive patients with hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent total PLE with gastric pull-up reconstruction in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between 1996 and 2014 were analyzed in this study. Of these patients, 28 underwent tubular gastric pull-up reconstruction procedure (Group A), whereas 24 underwent whole gastric pull-up reconstruction procedure (Group B). We compared the postoperative complications between these two groups retrospectively. Postoperative anastomotic fistulas occurred in three patients in Group A (3/28) versus eight patients in Group B (8/24), leading to an incidence rate of 10.71 and 33.33 per cent, respectively. The incidence of intrathoracic stomach syndrome was 21.43 per cent in Group A (6/28) versus 58.33 per cent in Group B (14/24), and the incidence of reflux was 35.71 per cent in Group A (10/28) versus 66.67 per cent in Group B (16/24). All of the above postoperative complications exhibited statistical differences between two groups ( P ≤ 0.05). This retrospective observation study suggests that compared with whole gastric pull-up, tubular gastric pull-up is a better reconstruction procedure of choice after PLE, evidenced by reduced incidences of postoperative anastomotic fistula, intrathoracic stomach syndrome, and reflux.

Risk factors for esophageal fistula in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading adjacent organs treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: a monocentric case-control study

Background

Standard treatment for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) without distant metastasis is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), in which the incidence of esophageal fistula (EF) is reported to be 10–12%. An ad hoc analysis of JCOG0303, a phase II/III trial of dCRT for patients with unresectable ESCC (including non-T4b), suggested that esophageal stenosis is a risk factor for EF. However, risk factors for EF in patients limited to T4b ESCC treated with dCRT have yet to be clarified. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for EF in T4b thoracic ESCC treated with dCRT.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive T4b thoracic ESCC patients who were treated with dCRT (cisplatin and fluorouracil) at Shizuoka Cancer Center between April 2004 and September 2015.

Results

Excluding 8 patients with esophageal fistula clearly attributable to other iatrogenic interventions, the data of 116 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Esophageal fistula was observed in 28 patients (24%). Although the fistula was closed in 5 patients, overall survival was significantly shorter in patients who experienced esophageal fistula (8.0 vs. 26.8 months; p < 0.0001). Among four potential variables extracted in univariate analysis, namely, total circumferential lesion, elevated CRP level, elevated white blood cell count, and anemia, the first two were revealed as risk factors for esophageal fistula in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that total circumferential lesion and CRP ≥1.00 mg/dL are risk factors for esophageal fistula in T4b thoracic ESCC treated with dCRT.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4486-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Utility of initial induction chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) for T4 esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Although no consensus is available on the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) invading adjacent organs (T4), establishing effective induction treatments is crucial to altering an unresectable status and achieving curative resection. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) as the initial induction treatment for T4 ESCC. Fifty patients without distant metastasis who underwent initial induction chemotherapy using DCF for T4 ESCC were propensity score-matched with 50 patients who underwent radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CRT). In the DCF group, 24 (48.0%) patients underwent surgery, achieving a 64% clinical response rate compared to 72.0% for induction CRT. CRT was also performed in another 24 (48.0%) patients in the DCF group in whom surgical resection was not indicated. The DCF group had significantly higher overall resectability than the CRT group (78.0% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.0017). The esophageal perforation rate during induction treatments was significantly lower in the DCF group than the CRT group (4.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.0205). Prognosis was significantly better in the DCF group than the CRT group (5-year cancer-specific survival 42.1% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.0146). Thus, induction DCF chemotherapy in patients with T4 ESCC reduced esophageal perforation and increased overall resectability, leading to better survival than CRT alone. Therefore, DCF chemotherapy may be an effective and safe option for initial induction treatment of T4 ESCC.

New classification for the thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To create a new classification for the thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes (No. 112ao) of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Classification of these nodes in ESCC patients has been the focus of very few reports.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 27 patients with positive No. 112ao nodes on computed tomography (CT) images before treatment. We divided the No. 112ao nodes into No. 112aoA, located on the esophageal side as anterior No. 112ao nodes, and No. 112aoP, located on the opposite side of the esophagus as posterior No. 112ao nodes. We examined the association between No. 112aoA and No. 112aoP and clinicopathological factors. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between the No. 112aoA- and No. 112aoP-positive groups.

RESULTS

There were 12 patients in the No. 112aoA-positive group and 15 patients in the No. 112aoP-positive group. The No. 112aoP-positive group had significantly worse RFS than the No. 112aoA-positive group (p = 0.004). Cox multivariate analysis of RFS revealed that No. 112aoP positivity was an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Our new classification of No. 112ao nodes into No. 112aoA and No. 112aoP is useful clinically. No. 112aoP could correspond to the clinical N4 category of patients with ESCC.

Importance of positron emission tomography for assessing the response of primary and metastatic lesions to induction treatments in T4 esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus strategy for treatment of T4 esophageal cancer, and because of this, a better evaluation of treatment response is crucial to establish personalized therapies. This study aimed to establish a useful system for evaluating treatment response in T4 esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This study included 130 patients with cT4 esophageal cancer without distant metastasis who underwent ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography before and after a series of induction treatments comprising chemoradiation or chemotherapy. We evaluated the maximal standardized uptake value and treatment response.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation of standardized uptake value in the primary tumor before and after induction treatments were 13.8 ± 4.4 and 5.4 ± 4.1, respectively, and the mean standardized uptake value decrease was 58.4%. The most significant difference in survival between positron emission tomography-primary tumor responders and nonresponders was at a decrease of 60% standardized uptake value, based on every 10% stepwise cutoff analysis (2-year cause-specific survival: 60.2 vs 23.5%; hazard ratio = 2.705; P < .0001). With this cutoff value, the resectability (P = .0307), pathologic response (P = .0004), and pT stage (P < .0001) were associated with positron emission tomography-primary tumor response. Univariate analysis of 2-year cause-specific survival indicated a correlation between cause-specific survival and clinical stages according to TNM classification, esophageal perforation, positron emission tomography-primary tumor response, lymph node status evaluated by positron emission tomography before and after induction treatments, and operative resection. Multivariate analysis further identified positron emission tomography-primary tumor response (hazard ratio = 2.354; P = .0107), lymph node status evaluated by positron emission tomography after induction treatments (hazard ratio = 1.966; P = .0089), and operative resection (hazard ratio = 2.012; P = .0245) as independent prognostic predictors.

CONCLUSION

Positron emission tomography evaluation of the response of primary and metastatic lesions to induction treatments is important to formulate treatment strategies for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Is 18F-FDG-PET useful for predicting R0 resection after induction therapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

Induction therapy followed by surgery is a promising strategy for esophageal cancer patients with invasion of the trachea/bronchus or aorta. However, no diagnostic criteria have been established to diagnose whether R0 resection can be performed. We investigated whether ¹⁸F-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) and other modalities are useful for predicting R0 resection.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with esophageal cancer invading the trachea/bronchus or aorta who underwent induction therapy followed by surgery were enrolled. We divided the participants into two groups, an R0 resection group (n = 43) and a non-R0 resection group (n = 14), and then compared the between-group results of three modalities, including computed tomography (CT), endoscopy and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET, before and after induction therapy.

RESULTS

The post-maximal standardized uptake value (SUV_max) after induction therapy in the R0 resection group was significantly lower than that in the non-R0 resection group (4.4 vs. 6.6, p = 0.005). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cut-off value for the post-SUV_max based on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET prediction of R0 resection was 4.7. Furthermore, a tumor reduction rate of ≥44% on CT, no residual stenosis, and no deep ulcer on endoscopy were associated with R0 resection after induction therapy (p = 0.002, p = 0.091, and p = 0.059, respectively). Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that the tumor reduction rate on CT and post-SUV_max <4.7 in ¹⁸F-FDG-PET were independent factors for R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-SUV_max determined by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and the volume reduction rate based on CT scans were useful for predicting R0 resection after induction therapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Inter-evaluator heterogeneity of clinical diagnosis for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Identifying clinical resectability of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is important, although inter-evaluator heterogeneity (IEH) could exist, especially in borderline resectable (BLR) cases. To investigate the extent of heterogeneity, we conducted clinical diagnostic imaging questionnaires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five cases with clinical T3 or T4 cases, which were treated with neo-adjuvant triplet chemotherapy followed by surgery, were selected as the model. These cases were divided into two groups: curative resected cases (#1-#3) and non-curative resected cases (#4 and #5). Only imaging slides were shown without any information about patient characteristics or clinical course. The evaluators consisted of surgeons (staff and non-staff), medical oncologists, and an imaging radiologist; a total of 25 medical staff answered the questionnaire. Two questions (1: clinical T stage before chemotherapy, 2: resectability after chemotherapy) were answered. Occupational differences were assessed by comparing the results to the imaging radiologist.

RESULTS

IEH was observed for clinical diagnosis before chemotherapy in one case (clinical T4: 52%, clinical T3: 48%). In the other cases, most evaluators diagnosed them as clinical T4, with 76-88% agreement. IEH for clinical resectability after chemotherapy was relatively small. Occupational IEH was observed in both before and after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

IEH in decisions about treating BLR cases in ESCC should be considered in clinical practice. Multi-disciplinary teams are essential to overcome this problem.

Chemoradiotherapy and surgery for T4 esophageal cancer in Japan

Esophageal cancer is thought to be the most malignant neoplasm due to its biological aggressiveness. The most effective treatment modality for esophageal cancer, particularly T4 esophageal cancer, is chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Some T4 patients show long-term survival after receiving CRT, suggesting that even T4 esophageal cancer can be cured with this modality. Although surgery is performed after CRT in some T4 cases, its prognostic benefit is controversial. In this paper, we review the status of CRT and conversion surgery as well as the development of new regimens and discuss the future prospects of CRT in the treatment of T4 esophageal cancer in Japan.

Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with locoregionally advanced oesophageal tumours or disputable distant metastases are referred for induction chemotherapy with the aim to downstage the tumour before an oesophagectomy is considered.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent induction chemotherapy between January 2005 and December 2012 were identified from an institutional database. Treatment plan was discussed in the multidisciplinary team. Response to chemotherapy was assessed by CT. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival.

RESULTS

In total 124 patients received induction chemotherapy mainly for locoregionally advanced disease (n = 80). Surgery was withheld in 35 patients because of progressive disease (n = 16) and persistent unresectability (n = 19). The median overall survival of this group was 13 months (IQR: 8-19). The remaining 89 patients underwent surgery of which 13 still had unresectable tumour or distant metastases. Of the 76 patients that underwent an oesophagectomy, 50 patients had tumour free resection margins (66%) with an estimated 5-year survival of 37%. A positive resection margin (HR 4.148, 95% CI 2.298-7.488, p < 0.0001) was associated with a worse survival in univariable analysis, but only pathological lymph node status with increasing hazard ratio's (6.283-10.283, p = 0.001) remained significant after multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy downstages the tumour and facilitates a radical oesophagectomy in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. Pathological lymph node status is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival.

High pathologic complete remission rate from induction docetaxel, platinum and fluorouracil (DCF) combination chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal and junctional cancer

Adding docetaxel to the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil induction regimen for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ cancer may increase the pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate, leading to an improved outcome. Institutional ethics committee approved the protocol of retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced esophageal and GEJ carcinoma, who received 2-3 cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) induction chemotherapy with primary growth factors and prophylactic antibiotics. Following chemotherapy, a restaging scan was performed. If disease was deemed resectable, surgery was performed. Between February 2010 and October 2013, 31 patients received induction DCF. Ninety-four percent patients had squamous histology. Response rate was 81 %: complete remission (CR)-23 % and partial remission-58 %. Eighty-seven percent patients underwent surgery; R0 resection rate was 67 %. pCR occurred in 26 %. Common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia-23 %, neutropenia-42 %, febrile neutropenia-39 %, diarrhea-39 %, hyponatremia-55 % and hypokalemia-39 %. There were no toxic deaths. At a median follow-up of 34 months (95 % CI 31.3-36.6), estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) was 27 months (95 % CI 11-39) and the overall survival (OS) at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years was 80, 68 and 55 %, respectively. Patients who attained pCR had a significant longer PFS and OS; median PFS and OS were not reached in patients with pCR and were 15 months (95 %CI 8.4-21.5 months), P = 0.012 and 25 months (95 %CI 10.3-39.7), P = 0.023, respectively, in patients who did not attain a pCR. DCF induction chemotherapy leads to pCR of 26 %, which rivals that obtained from chemoradiotherapy. Toxicity is substantial but manageable with adequate supportive care.

Induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancer: results of a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the survival rate of patients undergoing R0 esophagectomy after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for unresectable T4 esophageal cancer (URT4) would be similar to that of patients undergoing esophagectomy for immediately resectable esophageal cancer with no unfavorable prognostic factors (RNU).

METHODS

Between April 2002 and June 2012, 87 of 283 patients with esophageal cancer who presented at the University Hospital of the Ryukyus were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Tumors were classified as RNU and URT4 in 44 and 43 of the 87 patients, respectively. Outcomes of treatment for URT4 patients were compared with those of RNU patients.

RESULTS

The R0 resection rate (61 %) and in-hospital mortality rate (20 %) of URT4 patients were significantly poorer than those of RNU patients (98 and 2.3 %, respectively), although the morbidity rate was similar in the two groups (63 and 52 %, respectively). The 5-year survival rate (35 %) of URT4 patients was significantly poorer than that of RNU patients (67 %) in the intention-to-treat analysis. However, no significant difference was noted between the two survival curves for cases of R0 resection (5-year survival rate, 60 % vs. 69 %). Multivariate analysis revealed R status as the only significant independent prognostic factor for URT4 patients (P < 0.001; hazard ratio = 8.279).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory survival rates can be achieved if R0 resection is performed after induction treatment in patients with T4 esophageal cancer, although secondary radical esophagectomy is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Determinants of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer using 18F-fluorodeoxiglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET)

BACKGROUND

(18)F-FDG-PET is potentially useful for evaluating response to neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. However, the optimal (18)F-FDG-PET parameter for evaluating the response to therapy and survival has not been established. This study aimed to select the best of the two parameters of fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET): decreased ratio of maximal standardized uptake (SUVmax-DR) or absolute value of posttreatment SUVmax (post-SUVmax), in predicting response and survival of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

The study subjects were 211 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. (18)F-FDG-PET was performed before and 2-3 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in assessment with pretreatment SUVmax (pre-SUVmax), post-SUVmax and SUVmax-DR.

RESULTS

The mean SUVmax decreased during neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 11.4 to 5.8, and the mean SUVmax-DR was 49.4%. Both post-SUVmax and SUVmax-DR correlated significantly with pathological response, although neither post-SUVmax nor SUVmax-DR could distinguish pathological complete response from pathological good response. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients with SUVmax-DR of >50% than those with <50% (56.5 vs. 39.6 %, p = 0.0137), and also significantly higher in patients with post-SUVmax of <3.5 than those with >3.5 (62.2 vs. 35.1%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified post-SUVmax value, but not SUVmax-DR, as an independent prognostic factor in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-SUVmax is more useful for predicting survival of patients with esophageal cancer who undergo neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery, although both SUVmax-DR and post-SUVmax equally correlate with pathological response.

Relevance of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-positive lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell oesophageal cancer

Background

Several studies have examined the clinical significance of metabolic response in primary tumours by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in patients with oesophageal cancer who undergo neoadjuvant therapy. The relevance of the metabolic response in lymph nodes is unclear.

Methods

Consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery were studied. 18F-FDG-PET was performed before and 2–3 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, assessing FDG uptake in primary tumours and lymph nodes considered to be metastatic.

Results

Before therapy, 156 (73·9 per cent) of 211 patients had PET-positive nodes, of whom 89 (57.1 per cent) had no evidence of metabolic activity in these lymph nodes following chemotherapy. There was a significant relationship between post-treatment lymph node status assessed by FDG-PET and numbers of pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes. Patients with post-treatment PET-positive nodes had shorter survival than those without (5-year survival rate 25 versus 62·6 per cent; P &lt; 0·001). There was no difference in survival between patients with PET-positive nodes before but not after therapy and patients who had PET-negative nodes throughout (5-year survival rate 59 versus 71 per cent respectively; P = 0·207). Multivariable analysis identified post-treatment nodal status assessed by FDG-PET and tumour depth as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Identification of PET-positive lymph nodes after completion of chemotherapy is a predictor of poor prognosis of patients with oesophageal cancer scheduled for surgery. FDG-PET lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more important than that before chemotherapy.

A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The contribution of induction chemotherapy (IC) before preoperative chemoradiation for esophageal cancer (EC) is not known. We hypothesized that IC would increase the rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR).

METHODS

Trimodality-eligibile patients were randomized to receive no IC (Arm A) or IC (oxaliplatin/FU; Arm B) before oxaliplatin/FU/radiation. Surgery was attempted ∼5-6 weeks after chemoradiation. The pathCR rate, post-surgery 30-day mortality, overall survival (OS), and toxic effects were assessed. Bayesian methods and Fisher's exact test were used.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized dynamically to balance the two arms for histology, baseline stage, gender, race, and age. Fifty-five patients in Arm A and 54 in Arm B underwent surgery. The median actuarial OS for all patients (54 deaths) was 45.62 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 27.63-NA], with median OS 45.62 months (95% CI 25.56-NA) in Arm A and 43.68 months (95% CI 27.63-NA) in Arm B (P = 0.69). The pathCR rate in Arm A was 13% (7 of 55) and 26% (14 of 54) in Arm B (two-sided Fisher's exact test, P = 0.094). Safety was similar in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that IC produces non-significant increase in the pathCR rate and does not prolong OS. Further development of IC before chemoradiation may not be beneficial. Clinical trial no.: NCT 00525915 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Clinical and oncological effects of triplet chemotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer associated with unfavorable prognostic factors

PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that the survival of patients undergoing R0 resection after triplet chemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer with unfavorable prognostic factors (Category 3) would be similar to that of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer without such factors (Category 1).

METHODS

Patients with Category 3 tumors were assigned to receive triplet chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and nedaplatin (FAN) followed by radical esophagectomy. The outcomes of the bimodality treatment for Category 3 patients (n = 25) were compared with those of Category 1 patients (n = 41) in a prospective cohort study.

RESULTS

Grade 3 or higher toxicity developed during chemotherapy in 32 % of the Category 3 patients, with no treatment-related deaths. No significant difference was detected in the surgery-related mortality and morbidity rates between the two groups. The recurrence-free survival was significantly worse in Category 3 than in Category 1 patients (p = 0.002), although the overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0.085) between the two groups in cases of R0 resection (5-year survival rates: 34.4 vs. 66.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Although FAN chemotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy can be safely performed, this treatment modality may not have sufficient power to cure Category 3 disease.