Should adenosquamous esophageal cancer be treated like adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma?

Experience with chemotherapy for postoperative metastases of adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and pathological study of its development

We report here a case of postoperative recurrent adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) treated with S-1 therapy. A 79-year-old woman was diagnosed with carcinoma of the EGJ. Thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy was performed, and pathological examination revealed advanced ASC with lymph node metastasis. Five months after surgery, multiple lung metastases and multiple lymph node metastases were observed, and the patient was treated with S-1 monotherapy, which showed partial response and may be effective for advanced ASC of the EGJ. On the other hand, immunohistological analysis of the tumors showed a relatively wide range of areas that could differentiate into both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, suggesting that tumor cells with multidifferentiation potential, or at least the ability to differentiate into both adeno-epithelial and squamous epithelial cells, were the likely source of the tumors.

Occurrence and Prognosis of Mixed Subtype Adenocarcinoma and Adeno-Squamous Carcinoma in Esophageal Cancer

Purpose: To gain a deeper understanding of the incidence and survival rates of rare esophageal mixed adenoacanthoma (EAM) and esophageal mixed adeno-squamous carcinoma (EASC) to promote a more comprehensive understanding of these two subtypes. Background: EAM and EASC are rare subtypes of esophageal cancer with limited literature available. Extensive research has been conducted on the clinical and pathological characteristics of gastric and colorectal mixed adenoacanthomas, but there is relatively little literature on esophageal mixed adenoacanthomas. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the incidence and survival rates of these two subtypes in depth. Methods: Patients diagnosed with EAM and EASC between 2000 and 2019 were selected from the SEER database for the study. Joinpoint software was used to calculate the incidence rates of esophageal AM and ASC patients, and differences in cancer overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) based on Kaplan-Meier curves were compared. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was employed to identify independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, and a prognostic model was established and validated for accuracy. Results: The study found that the incidence of EAM increased until 2014, followed by a decline, while the incidence of EASC decreased until 2017, followed by an increase. Both of these subtypes were more common in male patients and those over the age of 65. For EAM patients, preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with better survival rates, while for EASC patients, preoperative radiotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival. Finally, we constructed nomograms for predicting the overall survival of EAM and EASC patients by incorporating identified risk factors, which demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: EAM and EASC are rare subtypes of esophageal cancer, and an in-depth exploration of their incidence and survival rates provides valuable data and insights for understanding these rare esophageal cancer subtypes. This information can assist clinical decision-making for healthcare professionals.

The role of surveillance and salvage esophagectomy in previously treated esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality among men and women in the United States. The utility of surgery, as either an immediate or delayed resection in the form of esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy in local-regionally advanced esophageal cancer, remains controversial. While neoadjuvant therapy followed by immediate surgery is a guideline-concordant treatment, emerging data suggests that active surveillance with delayed resection at the time of local-regional recurrence may be considered.

Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in 2020 and projections to 2030 and 2040

Esophageal cancer is a familiar malignancy with high incidence and mortality, and the overall prognosis is poor. The numbers of cases of and deaths from esophageal cancer have risen rapidly in recent decades. It is one of the most malignant cancers, with more than 0.6 million new cases and 0.54 million deaths worldwide in 2020. Here, we present the global epidemiology of esophageal cancer in 2020 and projections to 2030 and 2040 at different geographical levels of continents, regions and countries, and analyze them by gender, race, geographic region and human development index. We summarize the prospects for the esophageal cancer burden and risk factors in different areas, which will be useful for global esophageal cancer clinical therapy and cancer control planning.

Bombyx mori Cecropin D could trigger cancer cell apoptosis by interacting with mitochondrial cardiolipin

Cecropin D is an antimicrobial peptide from Bombyx mori displaying anticancer and pro-apoptotic activities and, together with Cecropin XJ and Cecropin A, one of the very few peptides targeting esophageal cancer. Cecropin D displays poor similarity to other cecropins but a remarkable similarity in the structure and activity spectrum with Cecropin A and Cecropin XJ, offering the possibility to highlight key motifs at the base of the biological activity. In this work we show by NMR and MD simulations that Cecropin D is partially structured in solution and stabilizes its two-helix folding upon interaction with biomimetic membranes. Simulations show that Cecropin D strongly interacts with the surface of cancer cell biomimetic bilayers where it recognises the phosphatidylserine headgroup often exposed in the outer leaflet of cancerous cells by means of specific salt bridges. Cecropin D is also able to penetrate deeply in bilayers containing cardiolipin, a phospholipid found in mitochondria, causing significant destabilization in the lipid packing which might account for its pro-apoptotic activity. In bacterial membranes, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylethanolamine act synergically by electrostatically attracting cecropin D and providing access to the membrane core, respectively.

Surgical resection for esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma: an analysis of 56 cases

BACKGROUND

Esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (EASC) is a rare disease. The biological behavior and treatment of this malignancy are not well studied.

METHODS

Data from 56 patients with EASC who underwent esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 5028 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The impact of clinicopathological factors on the survival of patients with EASC was analyzed. The survival differences between patients with EASC and ESCC were also compared.

RESULTS

There were 43 males and 13 females with a mean age of 59.7 ± 1.3 years (range, 39-79 years). Only 1 of the 43 patients who received preoperative esophagoscopic biopsy was diagnosed with EASC. The median survival time for patients with EASC was 32.0 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 78.3%, 46.1%, and 29.6%, respectively. Resection margin, pN category, and adjuvant chemotherapy were found to be independent predictors. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the 5-year overall survival rate of 29.6% for patients with EASC was similar to that of 42.5% for patients with ESCC (P = 0.179).

CONCLUSIONS

EASC is a rare disease and is easily misdiagnosed by esophagoscopic biopsy. The prognosis of EASC was similar to that of ESCC. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the survival of patients with EASC after esophagectomy.

Post-Neoadjuvant Surveillance and Surgery as Needed Compared with Post-Neoadjuvant Surgery on Principle in Multimodal Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review

Simple Summary

A substantial fraction of patients with esophageal cancer show post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR). Principal esophagectomy after neoadjuvant treatment is the standard of care for all patients, including those with pCR. Surveillance and surgery as needed may be a treatment alternative for these patients. We performed a scoping review and described all relevant clinical studies addressing these two treatment approaches. We identified three completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 468 participants, three planned/ongoing RCTs with a planned sample size of 752 participants, one non-randomized controlled study with 53 participants, ten retrospective cohort studies (2228 participants) and one survey on patients’ preferences (100 participants). The current scoping review reveals that although surveillance and surgery as needed has been investigated within different study designs, the available study pool show methodological limitations and clinical results are heterogeneous. A thoroughly planned RCT considering these limitations will be of great importance to provide these patients with the best treatment.

Abstract

Background: A substantial fraction of patients with esophageal cancer show post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR). Principal esophagectomy after neoadjuvant treatment is the standard of care for all patients, although surveillance and surgery as needed in case of local recurrence may be a treatment alternative for patients with complete response (CR). Methods: We performed a scoping review to describe key characteristics of relevant clinical studies including adults with non-metastatic esophageal cancer receiving multimodal treatment. Until September 2020, relevant studies were identified through systematic searches in the bibliographic databases Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, ClinicalTrials, the German study register, and the WHO registry platform. Results: In total, three completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs, with 468 participants), three planned/ongoing RCTs (with a planned sample size of 752 participants), one non-randomized controlled study (NRS, with 53 participants), ten retrospective cohort studies (with 2228 participants), and one survey on patients’ preferences (with 100 participants) were identified. All studies applied neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols. None of the studies examined neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic protocols. Studies investigated patient populations with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and mixed cohorts. Important outcomes reported were overall, disease-free and local recurrence-free survival. Limitations of the currently available study pool include heterogeneous chemoradiation protocols, a lack of modern neoadjuvant treatment protocols in RCTs, short follow-up times, the use of heterogeneous diagnostic methods, and different definitions of clinical CR. Conclusion: Although post-neoadjuvant surveillance and surgery as needed compared with post-neoadjuvant surgery on principle has been investigated within different study designs, the currently available results are based on a wide variation of diagnostic tools to identify patients with pCR, short follow-up times, small sample sizes, and variations in therapeutic procedures. A thoroughly planned RCT considering the limitations in the currently available literature will be of great importance to provide patients with CR with the best and less harmful treatment.