Critical analysis of lymph node examination in patients undergoing curative-intent resection for adrenocortical carcinoma

Prognostic significance of lymph node count in surgically treated patients with T2-4 stage nonmetastatic adrenocortical carcinoma

PURPOSE

The role of lymphadenectomy and the optimal lymph node count (LNC) cut-off in nonmetastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (nmACC) are unclear.

METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, surgically treated nmACC patients with T2-4 stages were identified between 2004 and 2020. We tested for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences according to pathological N-stage (pN0 vs. pN1) and two previously recommended LNC cut-offs (≥4 vs. ≥5) were tested in pN0 and subsequently in pN1 subgroups in Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 710 surgically treated nmACC patients, 185 (26%) underwent lymphadenectomy and were assessable for further analyses based on available LNC data. Of 185 assessable patients, 152 (82%) were pN0 and 33 (18%) were pN1. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, CSM-free survival was 74 vs. 14 months (Δ 60 months, P ≤ 0.001) in pN0 vs. pN1 patients, respectively. In multivariable analyses, pN1 was an independent predictor of higher CSM (HR:3.13, P < 0.001). In sensitivity analyses addressing pN0, LNC cut-off of ≥4 was associated with lower CSM (multivariable hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; P = 0.002). In sensitivity analyses addressing pN0, no difference was recorded when a LNC cut-off of ≥5 was used (HR:0.60, P = 0.09). In pN1 patients, neither of the cut-offs (≥4 and ≥5) resulted in a statistically significant stratification of CSM rate, and neither reached independent predictor status (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphadenectomy provides a prognostic benefit in nmACC patients and identifies pN1 patients with dismal prognosis. Conversely, in pN0 patients, a LNC cut-off ≥4 identifies those with particularly favorable prognosis.

Adrenocortical Cancer in the Real World: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Features and Management from the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)

INTRODUCTION

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare yet highly malignant tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to delineate the clinical features, survival patterns, and treatment modalities of ACC, providing insights into the disease's prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 157 ACC patients was performed to assess treatment methodologies, demographic patterns, pathological and clinical attributes, and laboratory results. The data were extracted from the hospital's database. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with univariate and multivariate analyses being performed through the log-rank test and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The median age was 45, and 89.4% had symptoms at the time of diagnosis. The median tumor size was 12 cm. A total of 117 (79.6%) patients underwent surgery. A positive surgical border was detected in 26 (24.1%) patients. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 44.4% of patients. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 44.3 months. Median OS was found to be 87.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.4-100.2) in stage 2, 25.8 (95% CI 6.5-45.1) months in stage 3, and 13.3 (95% CI 7.0-19.6) months in stage 4 disease. Cox regression analysis identified age, Ki67 value, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and hormonal activity as significant factors associated with survival in patients with nonmetastatic disease. In metastatic disease, only patients who underwent surgery exhibited significantly improved overall survival in univariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

ACC is an uncommon tumor with a generally poor prognosis. Understanding the defining prognostic factors in both localized and metastatic diseases is vital. This study underscores age, Ki67 value, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and hormonal activity as key prognostic determinants for localized disease, offering critical insights into the complexities of ACC management and potential avenues for targeted therapeutic interventions.

Minimally invasive versus open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: the keys surgical factors influencing the outcomes-a collective overview

PURPOSE

Adrenocortical carcinoma (A.C.C.) is a rare tumour, often discovered at an advanced stage and associated with a poor prognosis. Surgery is the treatment of choice. We aimed to review the different surgical approaches trying to compare their outcome.

METHODS

This comprehensive review has been carried out according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Among all studies identified, 18 were selected for the review. A total of 14,600 patients were included in the studies, of whom 4421 were treated by mini-invasive surgery (M.I.S.). Ten studies reported 531 conversions from M.I.S. to an open approach (OA) (12%). Differences were reported for operative times as well as for postoperative complications more often in favour of OA, whereas differences for hospitalization time in favour of M.I.S. Some studies showed an R0 resection rate from 77 to 89% for A.C.C. treated by OA and 67 to 85% for tumours treated by M.I.S. The overall recurrence rate ranged from 24 to 29% for A.C.C. treated by OA and from 26 to 36% for tumours treated by M.I.S.

CONCLUSIONS

OA should still be considered the standard surgical management of A.C.C. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has shown shorter hospital stays and faster recovery compared to open surgery. However, the laparoscopic approach resulted in the worst recurrence rate, time to recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in stages I-III ACC. The robotic approach had similar complications rate and hospital stays, but there are still scarce results about oncologic follow-up.

The prognosis difference between elderly and younger patients with adrenocortical carcinoma

Background and aim: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is uncommon in the elderly. This study aimed to compare the surgical prognosis and survival between senior and younger patients. We also explored the factors that were independently related to the survival of elderly patients. Methods: We identified ACC patients between 2010 and 2019 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and applied Kaplan-Meier curves to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) with log-rank tests. We also used Cox regression analysis to estimate the OS and CSS. The Fine and Gray model with the Gray test was used to measure the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of CSS and other mortality causes of patients in a competing-risks setting. Results: Of 876 patients, 44.06% were elderly. A lower proportion of elderly patients underwent surgery, regional lymph node surgery, and chemotherapy than young patients. Elderly patients also had inferior OS and CSS than younger patients. The 1- and 5-year OS of elderly patients who underwent surgery were 68% [95% confidence interval (CI): 62%-74%] and 30% (95% CI: 24%-38%), and the 1- and 5-year CSS were 73% (95% CI: 67%-80%) and 40% (95% CI: 32%-47%). The factors independently related to worsened survival included age ≥60 [Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.47 (1.24-1.75)], metastatic disease [HR: 1.90 (1.49-2.51)], higher grade [HR: 1.94 (1.08-3.46)] and Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENSAT) stage [HR: 1.99 (1.48-2.66)]. Conclusion: Younger ACC patients had better survival than the elderly. Factors independently related to worsened survival in elderly patients included age ≥60, metastatic disease, higher grade, and European ENSAT stage.

[Are there still indications for open adrenalectomy?]

Despite the triumph of minimally invasive techniques in adrenal surgery, the indications for open adrenalectomy are indispensable in the canon of treatment options and must remain part of the repertoire of visceral surgery. Open adrenalectomy is indicated for advanced adrenal carcinoma (ENSAT stage III). In addition to the frequent local infiltration of these carcinomas which makes the en bloc resection of adjacent organs necessary, thromboses in the renal vein or the vena cava or multiple lymph node metastases can also necessitate an open procedure; however, open adrenalectomy is justified and must also be discussed for adrenocortical carcinoma ENSAT stages I-II (tumor size ≤ 5 cm or > 5 cm, NO). Furthermore, highly suspicious large adrenal tumors (6-8 cm, Hounsfield units > 20) without preoperative evidence of malignancy and other adrenal pathologies, such as neuroblastomas, large pheochromocytomas and also schwannomas can be an indication for open adrenalectomy.

Impact of Lymphadenectomy on the Oncologic Outcome of Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The concept of locoregional lymphadenectomy (LND) in adrenocortical cancer (ACC) has gained interest in recent years, but its definite prognostic and therapeutic significance remains to be established. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the oncologic value of LND in ACC, focusing on overall survival as the primary endpoint. Eleven studies were identified and five were included in the meta-analysis, all of them were retrospective studies. Three studies reported the impact of LND on disease-specific survival in patients with stage I–III ACC and revealed a survival benefit of LND, whereas studies including patients with stage I–IV ACC (N = 2) did not show a survival benefit of LND. In summary, our results demonstrate an oncologic benefit of LND in patients undergoing curative-intended surgery for at least localized ACC (stage I–III).

Abstract

(1) Background: Locoregional lymphadenectomy (LND) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) may impact oncological outcome, but the findings from individual studies are conflicting. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the oncological value of LND in ACC by summarizing the available literature. (2) Methods: A systematic search on studies published until December 2020 was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The primary outcome was the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival (OS). Two separate meta-analyses were performed for studies including patients with localized ACC (stage I–III) and those including all tumor stages (I–IV). Secondary endpoints included postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). (3) Results: 11 publications were identified for inclusion. All studies were retrospective studies, published between 2001–2020, and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies (N = 807 patients) reported the impact of LND on disease-specific survival in patients with stage I–III ACC and revealed a survival benefit of LND (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.26–0.68). Based on results of studies including patients with ACC stage I–IV (2 studies, N = 3934 patients), LND was not associated with a survival benefit (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.70–1.42). None of the included studies showed an association between LND and postoperative mortality or LOS. (4) Conclusion: Locoregional lymphadenectomy seems to offer an oncologic benefit in patients undergoing curative-intended surgery for localized ACC (stage I–III).

Adrenocortical Carcinoma: The Value of Lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) staging does not account for the number of positive nodes. The prognostic value of quantitative metastatic nodal burden is unknown.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried from 2004-2016 to identify patients with Stage I-III ACC undergoing adrenalectomy. Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (LAD) were further studied. Demographics, TNM staging, tumor characteristics, and surgical approach were analyzed.

RESULTS

386 LADs were identified. The median number of nodes examined was 2 (IQR 2-6), with no difference by surgical approach '[laparoscopic, 3 (1-3); robotic, 1.5 (1-4.5); open, 2 (1-7), p = 0.493]. In LADs with cN0 disease, positive nodes were seen in 17.5% of patients; an average of 6 (1-12) nodes were examined in patients who upstaged to pN1 disease compared with an average of 2 (1-6) nodes in those who remained pN0. Median survival was incrementally worse for patients with more positive nodes (62.8 vs. 21.9 vs. 13.7 vs. 11.3 vs. 10.7 months for 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 positive nodes, respectively, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, significant prognostic factors for poor survival included older age, ≥ 2 comorbidities, pT3, and pT4. The strongest prognostic factor for poor survival was the number of positive nodes (1 node, hazards ratio [HR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-3.6; 2 nodes, HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.6-3.0; 3 nodes, HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.0; ≥ 4 nodes, HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.5-6.2). Lymphadenectomy was associated with improved survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher quantitative metastatic nodal burden is a robust prognostic factor for worse survival in ACC.

Surgical Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Highlights

INTRODUCTION

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor, often discovered at an advanced stage and associated with poor prognosis. Treatment is guided by staging according to the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENSAT) classification. Surgery is the treatment of choice for ACC. The aim of this review is to provide a complete overview on surgical approaches and management of adrenocortical carcinoma.

METHODS

This comprehensive review has been carried out according to the PRISMA statement. The literature sources were the databases PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library. The search thread was: ((surgery) OR (adrenalectomy)) AND (adrenocortical carcinoma).

RESULTS

Among all studies identified, 17 were selected for the review. All of them were retrospective. A total of 2498 patients were included in the studies, of whom 734 were treated by mini-invasive approaches and 1764 patients were treated by open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is the treatment of choice for ACC. Open adrenalectomy (OA) is defined as the gold standard. In recent years laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has gained more popularity. No significant differences were reported for overall recurrence rate, time to recurrence, and cancer-specific mortality between LA and OA, in particular for Stage I-II. Robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has several advantages compared to LA, but there is still a lack of specific documentation on RA use in ACC.

Adrenocortical carcinoma: current state of the art, ongoing controversies, and future directions in diagnosis and treatment

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with an annual incidence of ~1 case per million population. Differentiating between ACC and benign adrenocortical tumors can be challenging in patients who present with an incidentally discovered adrenal mass, due to the limited specificity of standard diagnostic imaging. Recently, urine steroid metabolite profiling has been prospectively validated as a novel diagnostic tool for the detection of malignancy with improved accuracy over current modalities. Surgery represents the only curative treatment for ACC, although local recurrence and metastases are common, even after a margin-negative resection is performed. Unlike other intra-abdominal cancers, the role of minimally invasive surgery and lymphadenectomy in ACC is controversial. Adjuvant therapy with the adrenolytic drug mitotane is used to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery, although evidence supporting its efficacy is limited; it is also currently unclear whether all patients or a subset with the highest risk of recurrence should receive this treatment. Large-scale pan-genomic studies have yielded insights into the pathogenesis of ACC and have defined distinct molecular signatures associated with clinical outcomes that may be used to improve prognostication. For patients with advanced ACC, palliative combination chemotherapy with mitotane is the current standard of care; however, this is associated with poor response rates (RR). Knowledge from molecular profiling studies has been used to guide the development of novel targeted therapies; however, these have shown limited efficacy in early phase trials. As a result, there is an urgent unmet need for more effective therapies for patients with this devastating disease.