Human papillomavirus reduces the prognostic value of nodal involvement in tonsillar squamous cell carcinomas

High-Risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA Detection in Mouthwashes for Diagnosis of HPV-Driven Oropharynx Cancer and Its Curative Therapy—A Feasibility Study

Detection of p16 through immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the standard for determining the HPV status of the tumor according the TNM eighth edition released in 2017 and has become crucial for determining the HPV status of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) with direct impact on staging and prognostication. In recent years, detection of HPV DNA in mouthwashes has been proposed as a noninvasive alternative, both for OPSCCs and for other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). However, the prospect of using the mouthwashes to monitor the response to therapy is unclear. To evaluate the effect of curative therapy on the detection of HPV DNA, we performed a prospective study comparing the detection frequency of high-risk HPV DNA (HR-HPV-DNA) in pre- and post-therapy mouthwashes. We collected 137 mouthwashes from 88 pathologically confirmed HNSCC patients for DNA isolation and HPV genotyping with the Inno-LiPA assay. We show that HPV DNA in pretherapeutic mouthwashes can detect HPV-driven HNSCCs with a sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 85.4%, alongside a high negative predictive value of 79.5% and an accuracy of 74.5%. Furthermore, we observed a notable decrease in the detection frequency of HR-HPV-DNA after successful treatment (pre-therapy 50.0% (9/18) versus post-therapy 9.7% (3/28)). However, the comparatively low sensitivity regarding detection of HPV-driven OPSCC argues against its use in clinical routine.

Additional parameters to improve the prognostic value of the 8th edition of the UICC classification for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal tumors

Background

The prognostic reliability of the UICC's TNM classification (8th edition) for human papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive tonsillar squamous cell carcinomas (TSCCs) compared to the 7th edition was explored, and its improvement by using additional anatomical and nonanatomical parameters.

Methods

One hundred and ten HPV‐positive and 225 HPV‐negative TSCCs were retrospectively analyzed. Survival was correlated with patient and tumor characteristics (7th and 8th edition UICC TNM classification).

Results

In HPV‐positive TSCCs, the 8th edition UICC's TNM classification correlated better with prognosis than the 7th edition. Also, smoking status was a stronger prognosticator of survival than UICC staging. Non‐ or former smokers had a 5‐year overall survival of 95.1% regardless of tumor stage. Furthermore, age (>65 years), cN3, and M1 classification were significant prognostic factors.

Conclusion

The prognostic value of the 8th edition UICC's TNM classification improved significantly when compared to the 7th edition. Nonetheless, further improvement is possible by adding nonanatomical factors (smoking, age >65 year) and separating N0‐N2 from N3.

Awareness of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers among GPs in the netherlands: cross-sectional study

Background

The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is increasing in high income countries. HPV-associated OPC generally presents as an invasive disease, often with lymph node involvement, in relatively young patients with minimal or no history of smoking and alcohol consumption. Knowledge on HPV-associated OPC among primary care professionals is essential for disease recognition and early start of treatment.

Aim

To examine the knowledge on HPV-associated OPC among GPs in the Netherlands.

Design & setting

A cross-sectional postal survey among GPs in the Netherlands.

Method

A 12-item questionnaire was sent to 900 randomly selected general practices. Outcome measures included awareness of the link between HPV and OPC, epidemiological trends, and patient characteristics. Data were statistically analysed for sex, years after graduation, and self-rated knowledge of OPC.

Results

A total of 207 GPs participated in this study. Seventy-two per cent recognised HPV as a risk factor for OPC and 76.3% were aware of the increasing incidence rate of HPV-associated OPC. In contrast, 35.7% of participants knew that patients with HPV-associated OPC are more often male, and just over half (53.6%) of the participants were aware of the younger age of these patients.

Conclusion

More than one-quarter of GPs in the Netherlands are unaware of HPV as a causative factor for OPC. Furthermore, there is a gap in knowledge on characteristics of patients with HPV-associated OPC . Further training on these topics could improve disease recognition and, ultimately, patient survival.

Staging of human papilloma virus related cancers of the oropharynx

For the past two decades an increasing number of oropharyngeal cancers have been found to be associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV). These tumors are a biologically distinct entity with better prognosis and excellent response to therapy. Therefore, a separate staging system has been introduced for HPV-related oropharyngeal tumors in the latest edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC eighth Ed).

The microbiome of HPV-positive tonsil squamous cell carcinoma and neck metastasis

BACKGROUND

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has now surpassed cervical cancer as the most common site of HPV-related cancer in the United States. HPV-positive OPSCCs behave differently from HPV-negative tumors and often present with early lymph node involvement. The bacterial microbiome of HPV-associated OPSCC may contribute to carcinogenesis, and certain bacteria may influence the spread of cancer from the primary site to regional lymphatics.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the bacterial microbiome in patients with HPV-associated, early tonsil SCC and compare them to benign tonsil specimens.

METHOD

The microbiome of primary tumor specimens and lymph nodes was compared to benign tonsillectomy specimens with pan-pathogen microarray (PathoChip).

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients with OPSCC had a microbiome that shifted towards more gram-negative. Numerous signatures of bacterial family and species were associated with the primary tumors and lymph nodes of cancer patients, including the urogenital pathogens Proteus mirabilis and Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Shigella dysenteriae, and Orientia tsutsugamushi.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that detection of urogenital pathogens is associated with lymph node metastasis for patients with HPV-positive OPSCCs. Additional studies are necessary to determine the effects of the OPSCC microbiome on disease progression and clinical outcomes.

Pre- and Post-Radiotherapy Radiologic Nodal Features and Oropharyngeal Cancer Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic value of pre-/post-radiotherapy (pre-/post-RT) radiologic lymph node (LN) features in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) patients treated with definitive (chemo-)RT.

METHODS

Clinical node-positive OPCs treated from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed. Nodal features were reviewed by a radiologist on pre-/post-RT computed tomography (CTs). Univariable analysis calculated hazard ratio (HR) for regional failure (RF), distant metastasis (DM), and deaths. Multivariable analysis estimated adjusted HR (aHR) of significant nodal features identified in univariable analysis adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Pre-RT CT was undertaken in 344 HPV-positive and 94 HPV-negative OPC patients, of whom 242 (70%) HPV-positive and 67 (71%) HPV-negative also had a post-RT CT. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. Pre-RT LN calcification (pre-RT_LN-cal) increased the risk of RF in HPV-negative (aHR: 5.3, P = .007) but not HPV-positive patients (P = .110). Pre-RT radiologic extranodal extension (pre-RT_rENE+) increased the risk of DM and death in both HPV-negative (DM: aHR 6.6, P < .001; death: aHR 2.1, both P = .019) and HPV-positive patients (DM: aHR 4.9; death: aHR 3.0, both P < .001). Increased risk of RF occured with < 20% post-RT LN size reduction in both HPV-negative (HR 6.0, P = .002) and HPV-positive cases (HR 3.0, P = .049). Post-RT_LN-cal did not affect RF, DM, or death regardless of tumor HPV status (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Pre-RT_LN-cal is associated with higher RF risk in HPV-negative but not in HPV-positive patients. Pre-RT_rENE increases risk of DM and death regardless of tumor HPV status. Minimal post-RT LN size reduction (< 20%) increases risk of RF in both diseases. Post-RT_LN-cal + has no apparent influence on outcomes in either disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 (a single institution case-control series) Laryngoscope, 131:E1162-E1171, 2021.

Prognostic value of nodal involvement in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma according to the HPV status

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Different studies performed in populations with a high incidence of HPV infection have found no prognostic capacity of clinical nodal involvement (cN+) in patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinomas. The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic ability of nodal involvement in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas according to HPV status in a cancer population with a low incidence of HPV infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of a cohort of 420 patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas treated during the period 1990-2016 for whom information on HPV status was available.

RESULTS

14.8% of the patients included in the study had HPV-positive tumours. In relation to patients without nodal involvement (cN0), nodal involvement at diagnosis (cN+) significantly decreased the specific survival of patients with HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinomas. Conversely, no differences in survival were found for patients with HPV-positive tumours according to the presence of nodal involvement. A history of toxic consumption did not change the absence of prognostic significance of nodal involvement for patients with HPV-positive tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional involvement at the time of diagnosis is not a prognostic variable for patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Treatment outcomes in oropharynx cancer patients who did not complete planned curative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients who did not complete their planned curative radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

OPC Patients who received less than planned curative RT dose between 2002 and 2016 were identified for analysis. HPV status was assessed. Radiation dose was normalized for fractionation variations using biological effective doses assuming tumor α/β = 10 Gy [BED10]. Outcomes were compared using BED10. Multivariable and univariable analysis identified OS predictors.

RESULTS

From a total of 80 patients who did not complete therapy, 64 patients were eligible for analysis. RT incompletion was due to: RT side effects (n = 23), patients' decision (n = 21), disease progression or metastases (n = 3), and other causes (n = 7). Median BED10 (Gy) was 56.2 for the HPV-positive and 58 for the HPV-negative. Three-year OS was 74% vs 13% (p < 0.001) for the HPV-positive (n = 29) and HPV-negative (n = 24), respectively. HPV-positive patients who received BED10 ≥55 had higher OS than those received BED10 <55 (94% vs 47%, p = 0.002) while no difference in OS by BED10 ≥55 vs <55 for the HPV-negative (12 vs 13%, p = NS). HPV-positive status was associated with a higher OS (HR 12.5, 95% CI, 4.54 to 33.3, p < 0.001). A total of 37 patients were available to estimate TD₅₀ for local control assessment. TD₅₀ (BED10) was estimated at 60.5 Gy for HPV-negative patients compared to 27.2 Gy for HPV-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Overall, in patients with incomplete treatment, HPV-positive OPC patients demonstrated a better OS compared to HPV-negative patients. HPV-positive patients who received BED10 ≥55 have higher rates of OS.

Detection of HPV infection in head and neck cancers: Promise and pitfalls in the last ten years: A meta-analysis

The current controversial discussion on the disease-specific survival of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive (+) and -negative (-) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head neck region was the motivation for the present meta-analysis. Different detection methods for HPV are available, though these often lack sensitivity. As a consequence, there may be false interpretation of HPV positivity. A bias concerning HPV status and therefore also survival rates is serving a non-durable relevance in the discussion of tailored therapies. A literature search was performed via the online database PubMed/NCBI, and data extraction and statistical analysis were conducted. A total of 139 studies published between 2004 and 2014 were evaluated in the present meta-analysis. The HPV detection methods, patient characteristics, tumor localizations and stages, as well as (neo-) adjuvant therapies and survival times were analyzed. The average incidence rates of HPV+ patients with oropharyngeal tumors were higher than those of patients with cancers of other regions of the head and neck. Upon evaluating the results of different detection methods no significant differences were identified. We have compared the HPV incidence rates of each detection method, when studies have used more than one. Regarding overall survival, the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for oropharyngeal SCC was 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.27-0.36]. Unfortunately, only 3 equivalent studies were available on nonoropharyngeal tumors, for which the pooled adjusted HR was 1 (95% CI=0.73-1.36). Overall, the evaluation demonstrated that the survival rates reported in numerous studies were not evaluated multifactorially and important confounders were excluded from the statistics. The HPV detection methods used were often not sufficient in representing HPV positivity. In addition, oropharyngeal and oral SCCs were assessed together in the localization. The widely differing number of HPV+ patients in each of the various studies may be explained by insufficient detection methods and by a lack of localization distinction. The considerations of a tailored therapy according to HPV status should be rejected based on the present information. The previously published studies should be read critically and do not represent a basis for therapeutic decisions.

Is HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Becoming More Common in Older Patients?

Objective

To evaluate changing age demographics over a 15‐year period for patients with HPV‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

Study Design

Retrospective review of patients identified with p16‐positive OPSCC at our institution over a 15‐year timeframe.

Materials/Methods: p16‐positive immunohistochemistry was used as a surrogate for HPV‐associated OPSCC. Patients were categorized according to year of diagnosis (2002‐2010 versus 2011‐2016). Mean age and proportion of patients over age 65 were statistically evaluated and compared.

Results

From 2002 to 2010, 100 patients were identified with p16‐positive OPSCC, mean age at diagnosis was 55.2, and the proportion of patients over 65 was 10.0%. From 2011 to 2016, 188 patients were identified with p16‐positive OPSCC, mean age was 58.5, and the proportion of patients over 65 was 19.6%. Both the mean age difference and the difference in proportion of patients over 65 were statistically significant (P = .001 and P = .034, respectively).

Conclusion

The mean age at diagnosis and proportion of patients over 65 has increased over the past 15 years at our institution. This data suggests that HPV‐associated OPSCC is being diagnosed more frequently in older persons and that the age demographic may be shifting. Confirmation of this trend with larger patient numbers on a national level will be valuable. This study highlights the importance of maintaining a high clinical suspicion for HPV‐associated OPSCC regardless of patient age.

Level of evidence

4

The interplay of IMRT and transoral surgery in HPV-mediated oropharyngeal cancer: Getting the balance right

Transoral surgery (TOS) and IMRT represent two primary local ablative treatment modalities for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). The choice of one over the other represents an interplay between the chance of cure vs risk of late sequelae. HPV-mediated (HPV+) OPC patients generally have excellent outcomes, especially in TNM-8 stage I disease. Controversies exist over which treatment has a more favorable toxicity profile and equal efficacy in the management of this population. Non-randomized retrospective data show comparable oncological and functional outcomes between TOS-based vs IMRT-based treatment for this disease. Several de-intensification concepts have been explored in this subset in both primary surgery-based vs primary radiotherapy-based trials. However, no robust mature trial data are available to convincingly guide treatment selection. TOS is often presented as one of the de-intensification options although the majority of series also describe the use of adjuvant treatments which inevitably result in non-negligible toxicities. Patient selection and surgeons' training are paramount. Understanding tumor biology and the prognostic value of traditional 'adverse' features will further guide trial design for refinement of risk tailored approach. In conclusion, comparative data suggests TOS and IMRT are both effective treatment for TNM-8 stage I HPV+ OPC with similar oncological and functional outcomes. TOS as a single modality has potential advantages in mitigating radiation included toxicities. TOS should be avoided in the presence of clinically overt extranodal extension or when negative margins are unlikely to be achieved. TOS is also less ideal for cases with radiological features predicting a high risk of distant metastasis.

Impact of PET/CT on Staging and Treatment of Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To understand the effects of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) evaluation on patients with previously untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with clinical evidence of regional lymph node involvement.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective blinded study.

SETTING

Tertiary care cancer center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Informed consent was obtained and data collected from 52 consecutive previously untreated patients with HNSCC and clinical evidence of cervical metastasis. All patients underwent conventional evaluation for HNSCC and whole body PET/CT. Data were evaluated by 5 independent reviewers, who performed TNM staging per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (seventh edition) manual and proposed a treatment plan prior to viewing, and after reviewing, PET/CT. Cases where at least 3 of 5 reviewers agreed were considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 0 patients for whom review of the PET/CT altered the T-class assessment (95% CI, 0-6.8), 12 (23.1%) for whom PET/CT altered N classification (95% CI, 12.5-34.5), and 2 (3.8%) for whom PET/CT altered the M classification (95% CI, 0.5-13.2). For 5 patients (9.6%), overall stage was altered per PET/CT review (95% CI, 3.2-21). For 3 patients (5.8%), PET/CT findings prompted reviewers to alter treatment recommendations (95% CI, 1.2-15.9).

CONCLUSION

When added to more conventional patient evaluation, PET/CT results in changes to the TNM categories, but overall staging and treatment were less frequently affected. Whether PET/CT should be used routinely for patients with stage III and IV HNSCC is still subjective and merits further study.

Survival outcome of tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) in the context of human papillomavirus (HPV): A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess whether HPV-positive TSCC had better survival and prognosis rates, when compared to HPV-negative TSCC.

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing HPV status in TSCC patients. TSCC was confirmed with histopathology and HPV status was confirmed with PCR, immunohistochemistry and/or in-situ-hybridisation. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were identified, involving 1921 TSCC cases, of which 56.2% (1079) were HPV positive. OS was significantly higher in patients with HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative TSCC in years 1-5 (OR 2.54, P < 0.01; OR 2.93 P < 0.01; OR 2.74 P < 0.01; OR 2.20 P < 0.01, and OR 2.14 P < 0.01 respectively). Similarly, DFS was also significantly higher in patients with HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative TSCC in years 1-3 (OR 2.86, P < 0.01; OR 2.60 P < 0.02; and OR 2.60 P < 0.01 respectively), which was attenuated in years 4 and 5 (OR 1.83, P = 0.10 and OR 1.50, P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest meta-analysis with 1921 patients, comparing non-HPV induced TSCC and HPV induced TSCC, looking at outcome and survival. HPV-positive had better OS and DFS.

Major Changes in Head and Neck Staging for 2018

Oncologists should be aware of three major modifications and additions to staging head and neck cancer that became effective in 2018. Oral cavity cancers have the addition of depth of invasion; oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs) are now distinguished by the immunohistochemical stain, p16, into those that are associated with high-risk human papillomavirus and those that are not; and all sites except nasopharyngeal carcinoma and high-risk human papillomavirus OPC will now include the important parameter of extranodal extension. The rationale and emerging data supporting these changes are discussed in this article and the accompanying oral presentation at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Human Papillomavirus Testing in Head and Neck Carcinomas: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists

Context Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major cause of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, and HPV (and/or surrogate marker p16) status has emerged as a prognostic marker that significantly impacts clinical management. There is no current consensus on when to test oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas for HPV/p16 or on which tests to choose. Objective To develop evidence-based recommendations for the testing, application, interpretation, and reporting of HPV and surrogate marker tests in head and neck carcinomas. Design The College of American Pathologists convened a panel of experts in head and neck and molecular pathology, as well as surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, to develop recommendations. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address 6 key questions. Final recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment period feedback, and expert panel consensus. Results The major recommendations include (1) testing newly diagnosed oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients for high-risk HPV, either from the primary tumor or from cervical nodal metastases, using p16 immunohistochemistry with a 70% nuclear and cytoplasmic staining cutoff, and (2) not routinely testing nonsquamous oropharyngeal carcinomas or nonoropharyngeal carcinomas for HPV. Pathologists are to report tumors as HPV positive or p16 positive. Guidelines are provided for testing cytologic samples and handling of locoregional and distant recurrence specimens. Conclusions Based on the systematic review and on expert panel consensus, high-risk HPV testing is recommended for all new oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients, but not routinely recommended for other head and neck carcinomas.

Overview of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The main purpose of the TNM system is to provide an anatomic-based classification to adequately depict cancer prognosis. Accurate cancer staging is important for treatment selection and outcome prediction, research design, and cancer control activities. To maintain clinical relevance, periodical updates to TNM are necessary. The recently published 8th edition TNM classification institutes the following changes to the staging of head and neck (excluding thyroid cancer): new stage classifications [HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+ OPC) and soft tissue sarcoma of the head and neck (HN-STS)] and modification of T and N categories [T and N categories for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), T categories for oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC), N categories for non-viral related head and neck cancer and unknown primary (CUP), and T categories for head and neck cutaneous carcinoma]. These changes reflect better understanding tumor biology and clinical behavior (e.g., HPV+ OPC and HN-STS), improved outcomes associated with technical advances in diagnosis and treatment (e.g., NPC), evolving knowledge about additional prognostic factors and risk stratification from research and observation (e.g., inclusion of depth of invasion variable for OSCC, inclusion of extranodal extension variable for all non-viral head and neck cancer, and reintroduction of size criteria for non-Merkel cell cutaneous carcinoma of the head and neck). This review summarizes the changes and potential advantages and limitations/caveats associated with them. Further evidence is needed to evaluate whether these changes would result in improvement in TNM stage performance to better serve the needs for clinical care, research, and cancer control.

[HPV - A different view on Head and Neck Cancer]

Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer with over 500000 annually reported incident cases worldwide. Besides major risk factors tobacco and alcohol, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) show increased association with human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV-associated and HPV-negative OSCC are 2 different entities regarding biological characteristics, therapeutic response, and patient prognosis. In HPV OSCC, viral oncoprotein activity, as well as genetic (mutations and chromosomal aberrations) and epigenetic alterations plays a key role during carcinogenesis. Based on improved treatment response, the introduction of therapy de-intensification and targeted therapy is discussed for patients with HPV OSCC. A promising targeted therapy concept is immunotherapy. The use of checkpoint inhibitors (e.g. anti-PD1) is currently investigated. By means of liquid biopsies, biomarkers such as viral DNA or tumor mutations in the will soon be available for disease monitoring, as well as detection of treatment failure. By now, primary prophylaxis of HPV OSCC can be achieved by vaccination of girls and boys.

Prevalence of HPV Infection in Racial-Ethnic Subgroups of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

The landscape of HPV infection in racial/ethnic subgroups of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients has not been evaluated carefully. In this study, a meta-analysis examined the prevalence of HPV in HNC patients of African ancestry. Additionally, a pooled analysis of subject-level data was also performed to investigate HPV prevalence and patterns of p16 (CDNK2A) expression amongst different racial groups. Eighteen publications (N = 798 Black HNC patients) were examined in the meta-analysis, and the pooled analysis included 29 datasets comprised of 3,129 HNC patients of diverse racial/ethnic background. The meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of HPV16 was higher among Blacks with oropharyngeal cancer than Blacks with non-oropharyngeal cancer. However, there was great heterogeneity observed among studies (Q test P<0.0001). In the pooled analysis, after adjusting for each study, year of diagnosis, age, gender and smoking status, the prevalence of HPV16/18 in oropharyngeal cancer patients was highest in Whites (61.1%), followed by 58.0% in Blacks and 25.2% in Asians (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in HPV16/18 prevalence in non-oropharyngeal cancer by race (P=0.682). With regard to the pattern of HPV16/18 status and p16 expression, White patients had the highest proportion of HPV16/18+/p16+ oropharyngeal cancer (52.3%), while Asians and Blacks had significantly lower proportions (23.0% and 22.6%, respectively) [P <0.0001]. Our findings suggest that the pattern of HPV16/18 status and p16 expression in oropharyngeal cancer appears to differ by race and this may contribute to survival disparities.

Adverse effect of smoking on prognosis in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

Medical records of 142 patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy between September 2005 and September 2011 were reviewed and the human papillomavirus (HPV) status was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Potential prognostic factors for 3-year locoregional control and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

HPV-positive patients (n = 82) had locoregional control and OS of 78% and 79%, respectively. Significant prognostic factors on multivariate analysis were smoking (p = .03) for locoregional control and OS, and comorbidity (p = .04) for OS. Further stratification was done according to smoking behavior in HPV-positive patients. Locoregional control in current smokers was 67% compared to 86% in never smokers and former smokers, respectively (p = .02).

CONCLUSION

Smoking was the only modifiable prognostic factor in HPV-positive patients. Therefore, active stop-smoking programs must be integrated in the routine management of patients to maximize treatment results. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1780-1787, 2016.

HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer: Unique Features of Epidemiology and Clinical Management

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a recently identified causative agent for a subset of head and neck cancers, primarily in the oropharynx, and is largely responsible for the rising worldwide incidence of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Patients with HPV-positive OPC have distinct risk factor profiles and generally have a better prognosis than patients with traditional, HPV-negative, head and neck cancer. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation is a widely accepted primary treatment modality for many patients with HPV-positive OPC. However, recent advances in surgical modalities, including transoral laser and robotic surgery, have led to the reemergence of primary surgical treatment for HPV-positive patients. Clinical trials are under way to determine optimal treatment strategies for the growing subset of patients with HPV-positive OPC. Similarly, identifying those patients with HPV-positive cancer who are at risk for recurrence and poor survival is critical in order to tailor individual treatment regimens and avoid potential undertreatment.

HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Carcinoma

Objective

Human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is increasing in incidence and appears to exhibit improved response to treatment and better survival than that of HPV– head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the current literature regarding treatment and prognosis of HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and identify whether type of treatment (primarily surgery vs primarily radiation) significantly affects survival rates.

Data Sources

PubMed and Cochrane Library databases.

Review Methods

A computerized search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify English-language articles published between January 1, 2000, and October 21, 2014. Studies were included only if they were prospective or retrospective observational series of OPSCC patients that reported HPV status, treatment regimen, and survival outcomes. Outcomes were determined for HPV+ and HPV– OPSCC patients, with subanalyses according to the type of treatment received.

Results

Fifty-six articles were eligible for this review. In the HPV+ analysis, the unadjusted hazard rate ratio (HR) for surgery vs radiation treatment was 1.33 ( P = .114). Nine confounders were considered, and HRs were adjusted for each covariate. While HRs were almost all >1 for all covariates, none of the HRs was statistically significant at P < .05. The HR for HPV– OPSCC was higher for radiation than surgery.

Conclusions

HPV+ OPSCC has an improved prognosis and lower rates of adverse events when compared with HPV– OPSCC. HPV– OPSCC had significantly worse outcomes when treated with primary radiation as compared with primary surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in HRs for HPV+ OPSCC with primary radiation vs primary surgery treatment.

[A clinical study of cases diagnosed as being oropharyngeal carcinoma after cervical mass extirpation/biopsy]

In the case of oropharyngeal carcinoma, patients may present with symptoms similar to cervical lymphadenopathy, and the primary lesion may only be diagnosed after cervical mass extirpation/biopsy. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical course in 11 oropharyngeal carcinoma patients that were diagnosed after cervical mass extirpation/biopsy between 1998 and 2013. Before the diagnosis was made of oropharyngeal carcinoma, a cervical lymph node biopsy was performed in six patients; the lymph node was extirpated due to an initial diagnosis of lateral cervical cyst in four patients; and neck dissection was performed due to an initial diagnosis of primary unknown carcinoma in one patient. The primary tumor site in the oropharynx was the palatine tonsil in six patients and the lingual tonsil in five patients. Five of six patients with palatine tonsil carcinoma and three of five patients with lingual tonsil carcinoma were found to be positive for human papillomavirus (HPV). The duration from cervical lymph node extirpation/biopsy to final diagnosis was 1 to 13 months. All patients finally underwent radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy, and they had no recurrence or metastasis. As the incidence of HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinoma increases, the number of oropharyngeal carcinomas assumed to be cervical lymphadenopathy due to the presenting symptoms may increase. It is important to investigate the oropharynx thoroughly so as to adequately differentiate the possibility of oropharyngeal carcinoma from that of cervical lymphadenopathy. Metastatic lymph nodes might present as cysts in cases of oropharyngeal carcinoma, it is therefore necessary to take the potential for metastatic lymph nodes in the oropharyngeal cancer into consideration when differentiating this disease from cervical cyst-shaped lesions.

Epidemiology of head and neck cancer

This article discusses risk factors, incidence trends, and prognostic considerations for head and neck cancer (HNC). The primary causes of HNC are tobacco and alcohol use, and human papillomavirus (HPV). Tobacco-related HNC incidence rates are decreasing in countries where tobacco use has declined. HPV-HNC, which occurs primarily in the oropharynx and is associated with sexual behaviors, has been increasing over the past several decades, among white men in particular. The prognosis for HNC overall has improved slightly since the 1990s, and is influenced by site, stage, and HPV status. Prognosis for HPV-HNC is significantly better than for HPV-negative disease.

High metastatic node number, not extracapsular spread or N-classification is a node-related prognosticator in transorally-resected, neck-dissected p16-positive oropharynx cancer

BACKGROUND

Due to unique biology and prognosis, precise identification of predictive parameters is critical for p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Prior studies showing absence of prognostication from extracapsular spread (ECS) and/or high N-classification in surgically-treated p16+ OPSCC necessitate new, evidence-based prognosticators.

METHODS

A prospectively assembled cohort of 220, transoral surgery+neck dissection±adjuvant therapy-treated, p16+ OPSCC patients was analyzed. Disease recurrence and disease-specific survival (DSS) were primary endpoints.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 59 (12-189) months. Distribution of metastatic node numbers was: 0 in 9.5% (n=21), 1 in 33.6% (n=74), 2 in 17% (n=38), 3 in 14.5% (n=32), 4 in 8.2% (n=18), and ⩾5 in 17% (n=37). ECS was recorded in 80% (n=159), and N2c-N3 in 17% (n=38). Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was administered in 44% and 34%. Recurrence developed in 22 patients (10%); 4 local, 5 regional, 2 regional and distant, and 11 distant. The 3- and 5-year DSS estimates were 94.6% and 93%. Multivariable logistic regression identified ⩾5 nodes and T3-T4 classification as predictors for recurrence. In multivariable Cox analyses, ⩾5 nodes, T3-T4 classification and margins were prognostic for DSS. ECS, N2c-N3 classification and smoking were not prognostic.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic node number, not ECS or high N-classification is an independent nodal predictor of outcomes in surgically-treated p16+ OPSCC patients. Despite high DSS (~80%), closer surveillance for recurrence is recommended for patients with ⩾5 metastatic nodes.

What are the implications of human papillomavirus status in oropharyngeal tumors for clinical practice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Human papillomavirus (HPV) status itself is an important and very probably the strongest prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Because of the prognostic advantage of patients with HPV-positive cancers, the issue of the quality of life of survivors has become increasingly important. The possibility of treatment de-escalation in patients with virally induced tumors is being considered. Many challenges have to be addressed in order to integrate HPV status in the routine decision-making in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. The present review discusses the standardization of detection methods suitable for clinical use and the differences in predictive parameters between patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The gold standard for the identification of patients with oropharyngeal tumors etiologically linked to HPV infection is undoubtedly the detection of HPV 16 E6/E7 mRNA. The detection of a surrogate marker of active viral infection, p16ink4a, has a low sensitivity when used alone and must therefore be combined with the detection of HPV DNA or HPV-specific antibodies. The detailed knowledge of the importance of specific prognostic parameters is crucial in the choice of treatment. Nodal staging is probably much less important in HPV-positive cancers.

SUMMARY

It is of great importance to implement standardized testing for the identification of patients with HPV-induced oropharyngeal tumors. The treatment decision models in HPV-positive tumors have to take into account the probably different prognostic value of nodal parameters. Before introducing treatment de-escalation in patients with virally induced tumors into clinical practice, more research and clinical studies are needed.

[Human papilloma virus in head and neck cancer]

Head and neck cancer is frequently associated with alcohol and tobacco consumption but there is an increasing incidence of oropharyngeal carcinoma associated with oncogenic type-16 human papillomavirus (HPV). The clinical profile of these patients is distinct from that of other patients, with an earlier onset, 1/1 male to female sex ratio, cystic cervical nodes. Detection of intratumoral viral DNA is essential to confirm the role of HPV. According to several reports, the prognosis in terms of survival and locoregional control is better in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma than in HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma or associated with tobacco consumption. The future lies in vaccination of women against cervical cancer but vaccination of boys will be certainly necessary.

Staging and treatment of oropharyngeal cancer in the human papillomavirus era

BACKGROUND

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is staged using the TNM system. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumors have improved prognosis, despite presenting at advanced stage. Optimal treatment and stratification of HPV-positive patients are not clearly defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 266 patients with oropharyngeal SCC for mortality and feeding tube dependency related to TNM stage, HPV status, and treatment.

RESULTS

TNM staging was prognostic in HPV-negative patients (stage III/IV hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; p = .05; N(+) HR, 2.19; p = .02). Only T classification was prognostic in HPV-positive tumors (T3/T4 HR 3.31; p = .006). HPV-positive tumors showed improved survival regardless of treatment. Patients receiving chemotherapy had a significantly increased risk of feeding tube dependency (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; p = .03).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the current TNM system has little prognostic value in HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC. Patients with HPV-positive tumors show improved survival independent of treatment. The addition of chemotherapy increases the risk of feeding tube dependency and could potentially be avoided in T1/T2 HPV-positive tumors without compromising survival.

Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal cancer: a multicenter study in Japan

BACKGROUND

The incidence rates of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have risen steadily in the USA and in northern Europe. These increases are thought to be a consequence of persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in OPSCC patients. HPV is an emerging etiologic factor in OPSCC. In Japan, the incidence of OPSCC has significantly increased over the last three decades. However, the population of HPV-positive OPSCC patients is currently unknown. We examined the nationwide trends with regard to HPV incidence in OPSCC patients at 21 specific sites, and examined the relationship between the presence of HPV and survival in OPSCC patients in Japan.

METHODS

Tumor samples were obtained from patients with OPSCC prior to treatment, and HPV infection was investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) was also adopted for swab examination on the surface of fresh tumors.

RESULTS

HPV was detected by PCR in 79 (50.3%) out of 157 OPSCC patients. The clinical features of HPV-positive OPSCC were low differentiation, a tendency to involve the lateral wall, and high nodal staging. The sensitivity and specificity of HC2 were 93.7 and 96.2%, respectively, indicating its utility as a screening test. HPV-positive patients had significantly better overall survival and disease-free survival than HPV-negative patients.

Human papilloma virus and survival of oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy

Impact of p16 protein, a surrogate marker for human papilloma virus induced cancer, p53 and EGFR as well as clinical factors on survival in a patient cohort with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated by surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) ± concomitant chemotherapy (CT). This is a retrospective analysis of patient's charts and tumor tissue. 57 patients were consecutively included and their tumor tissue assembled on a tissue microarray following immunohistochemical analysis. Survival times were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier analysis. The importance of clinical and immunohistochemical factors for outcome was estimated by cox proportional hazard models. With 88% 5-year overall survival, 91% 5-year disease-specific survival and 91% 5-year disease-free survival, respectively, we found excellent survival rates in this surgically treated patient cohort of mainly advanced OPSCC (93% AJCC stage III or IV). The only factors positively influencing survival were p16 overexpression as well as p53 negativity and even more pronounced the combination of those biomarkers. Survival analysis of patients classified into three risk categories according to an algorithm based on p16, smoking, T- and N-category revealed a low, intermediate and high-risk group with significant survival differences between the low and the high-risk group. Patients with OPSCC can be successfully treated by surgery and adjuvant RT ± CT with a clear survival benefit of p16 positive, p53 negative patients. We recommend considering a combination of immunohistochemical (p16, p53) and clinical factors (smoking, T- and N-category) for risk stratification.

The clinical impact of HPV tumor status upon head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is etiologically responsible for a distinct subset of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCCs). HPV-positive HNSCCs (HPV-HNSCCs) most commonly arise from the oropharynx and are responsible for the increasing incidence of oropharyngeal SCC (OSCC) in the United States (US) and abroad. HPV-positive OSCC (HPV-OSCC) has a unique demographic and risk factor profile and tumor biology. HPV-OSCC patients tend to be white, younger, and have a higher cumulative exposure to sexual behaviors as compared with HPV-negative OSCC patients. HPV-positive tumor status also significantly improves survival, and is indeed the single strongest prognostic factor for OSCC. The mechanisms that underlie the improved prognosis conferred by HPV-positive disease are unknown. The purpose of this review is to describe the clinical impact of HPV status in HNSCC, particularly in OSCC, both in terms of the unique clinic-demographic profile and prognostic implications.

[Public awareness of human papilloma virus infection in the head and neck area: an appeal for precision in diagnostics and for public health awareness]

Infection with human papilloma virus (HPV) has been associated with head and neck carcinomas. Experts in HPV-positive carcinomas consider these carcinomas to be a new entity, because it has been shown that treatment outcome is excellent with significantly longer overall survival dependent of therapy. Despite this, in Germany public awareness of this development is rather low. A strategy for prophylactic vaccination against HPV-associated diseases has been available since 2007 but only to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer for girls between 12 and 17 years of age. There is an ongoing debate in Germany about the efficacy and safety of HPV vaccination. The results of epidemiological research in the USA which show that vaccination in young males is valuable are still not accepted in Germany. This article discusses the scientific and public awareness regarding this topic and calls for precision in diagnostics and public health awareness in order to establish a fertile ground for prevention and optimal treatment of HPV-associated diseases.

p16 expression in carcinoma of unknown primary: diagnostic indicator and prognostic marker

BACKGROUND

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) of the neck are heterogeneous tumors in their clinical and biological characteristics, and a preoperative prognostic marker is desirable to optimize staging and therapy and to improve outcome and survival. For CUP syndrome, no optimized diagnostic and treatment strategy or biomarker have yet been determined.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients presenting with CUP syndrome were analyzed after thorough standard diagnostic staging procedures. All patients were surgically treated with tonsillectomy, neck dissection of the diseased neck, as well as adjuvant chemoradiation. The tissue of lymph node metastases (and, if found, of the primary tumor) was analyzed regarding expression of p16, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA.

RESULTS

In 39% of all cases (20 of 47), the primary cancer was found during diagnostic workup. If HPV DNA was detected in the neck lymph node metastasis, the primary cancer was significantly more frequently found in the oropharynx (p = .002). Patients with a p16-positive tumor had a significantly higher 5-year overall survival (OS; 33% vs 69%; p = .045, disease-free survival [DSF] 77% vs 89%; p = not significant [NS]). Patients with p16-positive neck metastasis and no detectable primary cancer had a better prognosis. Expression of EGFR in this series did not have a significant effect on prognosis.

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting with CUP syndrome, p16 immunohistochemistry can serve to locate the primary cancer in the oropharynx. It is a positive prognostic indicator in patients with those heterogeneous cancers.

Basics of tumor development and importance of human papilloma virus (HPV) for head and neck cancer

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas (HNSCC) are the 6(th) most common cancers worldwide. While incidence rates for cancer of the hypopharynx and larynx are decreasing, a significant increase in cancer of the oropharynx (OSCC) is observed. Classical risk factors for HNSCC are smoking and alcohol. It has been shown for 25 to 60% of OSCC to be associated with an infection by oncogenic human papilloma viruses (HPV). The development of "common" cancer of the head and neck is substantially enhanced by an accumulation of genetic changes, which lead to an inactivation of tumor suppressor genes or activation of proto-oncogenes. A more or less uniform sequence of different DNA-damages leads to genetic instability. In this context, an early and frequent event is deletion on the short arm of chromosome 9, which results in inactivation of the p16-gene. In contrast, for HPV-induced carcinogenesis, expression of the viral proteins E6 and E7 is most important, since they lead to inactivation of the cellular tumor-suppressor-proteins p53 and Rb. The natural route of transoral infection is a matter of debate; peroral HPV-infections might be frequent and disappear uneventfully in most cases. Smoking seems to increase the probability for developing an HPV-associated OSCC. The association of HNSCC with HPV can be proven with established methods in clinical diagnostics. In addition to classical prognostic factors, diagnosis of HPV-association may become important for selection of future therapies. Prognostic relevance of HPV probably surmounts many known risk-factors, for example regional metastasis. Until now, no other molecular markers are established in clinical routine. Future therapy concepts may vary for the two subgroups of patients, particularly patients with HPV-associated OSCC may take advantage of less aggressive treatments. Finally, an outlook will be given on possible targeted therapies.

Improved survival of Japanese patients with human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of oropharyngeal carcinoma is rising in western Europe and the United States, where there appears to be a strong association between human papillomavirus (HPV) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, such a correlation has not yet been fully evaluated in Japan.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the association between tumour HPV status and the demographic and clinicopathological parameters of 71 patients with OPSCC at Hokkaido University Hospital, Japan, between 1998 and 2009. The parameters included age, gender, survival, tumour subsite, tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, smoking history, second primary tumour status, recurrence/residual disease at the primary site, and overall survival. HPV status was established by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 71 oropharyngeal cancers, 20 were positive for HPV-16, two for HPV-18, and one for HPV-58. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed improved overall survival rates in patients with HPV-positive tumours (p = 0.0038) compared with HPV-negative tumours. Of the 45 patients who received chemoradiotherapy, HPV-positive patients experienced better overall survival than HPV-negative patients (p = 0.0032). In a multivariate analysis, the survival benefit of HPV-positive patients was independent of age and T and N classification.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV status is a significantly favourable prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer and could be used as a marker to optimize the treatment of patients with this type of cancer in Japan.