Validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument for acoustic neuroma

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With a Stable or Growing Vestibular Schwannoma Managed by Wait and Scan or Stereotactic Radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of wait and scan (W&S) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time in patients with a stable vestibular schwannoma (VS) and growing VS.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal, multicenter, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary expert center for VS (Radboudumc Nijmegen) and Gamma-Knife center ETZ Hospital Tilburg.

METHODS

Changes in HRQoL, measured with the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life (PANQOL), and the physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS, respectively) derived from the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), were compared among patients managed by W&S and SRS between 2017 and 2022. Second, HRQoL over time in patients with a growing VS was compared between W&S and SRS.

RESULTS

Differences in PANQOL total and subdomain scores, PCS and MCS scores over time in the W&S (n = 73) and SRS (n = 170) groups were nonsignificant and on average did not exceed the minimal clinically important differences (mean difference of -2.56 [PANQOL total], 1.22 [PCS], and -1.76 [MCS]; all P > .05). In growing VS, comparison of W&S (n = 29) and SRS (n = 154) also revealed no significant difference (mean difference of 1.19 (PANQOL total), 1.83 (PCS) and -0.12 (MCS); all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Differences in HRQoL in patients with VS are minor and not significantly different or clinically relevant between patients managed with W&S or SRS. Similarly, patients with a growing VS managed with W&S or SRS exhibit no significant or clinical relevant difference in HRQoL during follow-up. This can aid clinicians in the counseling of patients regarding HRQoL when deciding on a management strategy after diagnosis or documented growth.

German translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life Index (VSQOL)

BACKGROUND

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are benign tumors of the vestibulocochlear nerve that often cause significant neurological and functional impairment. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life (QoL), are essential for understanding the overall impact of VS and its treatment. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index into German to expand its relevance to German-speaking populations.

METHODS

We used a qualitative approach including translation and cognitive interviews with 10 patients who underwent VS surgery. The translation process followed the TRAPD protocol to ensure linguistic and conceptual accuracy. Cognitive interviews assessed the comprehensibility and relevance of the translated questionnaire.

RESULTS

The translation showed remarkable consistency between translators, with minor discrepancies resolved by consensus. Cognitive interviews provided valuable insights that led to refinements in item wording. Participants emphasized the importance of an additional item on physician referrals, reflecting differences in health care systems between the United States and Germany.

CONCLUSIONS

The German VSQOL provides a comprehensive tool for assessing QoL in patients with VS that integrates patient-centered dimensions. A Validation study is underway to establish its reliability and validity.

The comparison between intratympanic gentamicin prehabilitation and postoperative virtual reality exposure to standard vestibular training in patients with vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Resection of the vestibular schwannoma causes acute peripheral vestibular loss. The process of central compensation starts immediately afterward. The rehabilitation goal is to support this process and restore the quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective single-center study, 67 consecutive patients underwent vestibular schwannoma resection (40 females, mean age 52 ± 12 years). The patients were divided into three groups: the prehabilitation with intratympanic gentamicin group, the virtual reality group (optokinetic stimulation via virtual reality goggles in the first ten days after the surgery), and the control group. All patients were examined with objective methods and completed questionnaires before the prehabilitation, before the surgery, at the hospital discharge, and after three months.

RESULTS

Intratympanic gentamicin prehabilitation leads ipsilaterally to a significant aVOR reduction in all semicircular canals (p < 0.050), the increase of the unilateral weakness in air calorics (p = 0.026), and loss of cVEMPs responses (p = 0.017). Prehabilitation and postoperative exposure to virtual reality scenes improved the patient's perception of vertigo problems according to Dizziness Handicap Inventory (p = 0.039 and p = 0.076, respectively). These findings conform with the optokinetic testing results, which showed higher slow phase velocities at higher speeds (40 deg/s) in both targeted groups compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative intratympanic gentamicin positively affects peripheral vestibular function, influencing balance perception after VS resection. In long-term follow-up, prehabilitation and postoperative exposure to virtual reality improve patients' quality of life in the field of vertigo problems.

Patient-Related Outcome Measures for Oculomotor Symptoms in the Cerebellar Ataxias: Insights from Non-Cerebellar Disorders

In patients with cerebellar ataxia (CA), symptoms related to oculomotor dysfunction significantly affect quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to analyze the literature on patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) assessing QoL impacts of vestibular and cerebellar oculomotor abnormalities in patients with CA to identify the strengths and limitations of existing scales and highlight any areas of unmet need. A systematic review was conducted (Medline, Embase) of English-language original articles reporting on QoL measures in patients with vertigo, dizziness or CA. Pre-specified parameters were retrieved, including diseases studied, scales applied and conclusions drawn. Our search yielded 3671 articles of which 467 studies (n = 111,606 participants) were deemed relevant. The most frequently studied disease entities were (a) non-specific dizziness/gait imbalance (114 studies; 54,581 participants), (b) vestibular schwannomas (66; 15,360), and (c) vestibular disorders not further specified (66; 10,259). The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) was the most frequently used PROM to assess QoL (n = 91,851), followed by the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (n = 12,027) and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (n = 2'471). QoL-scores capturing symptoms related to oculomotor abnormalities in CA were rare, focused on visual impairments (e.g., National-Eye-Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, Oscillopsia Functional Impact, oscillopsia severity score) and were unvalidated. The DHI remains the most widely used and versatile scale for evaluating dizziness. A lack of well-established PROMs for assessing the impact of oculomotor-related symptoms on QoL in CA was noted, emphasizing the need for developing and validating a new QoL-score dedicated to the oculomotor domain for individuals with CA.

Gustatory Function in Patients With Cerebellopontine Angle Masses

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) masses on subjective and measured taste function.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive adult patients with untreated CPA masses.

INTERVENTIONS

Gustatory function was psychophysically measured with Taste Strips (range, 0-16) on both sides of the tongue. Subjective taste complaints were assessed using a questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Half-sided taste impairment (hemi-ageusia) was defined as side-to-side asymmetry ≥4 points with <9 points on the side of the CPA mass. We used the Koos classification for vestibular schwannomas (VS) and, in the case of facial nerve palsy, the House-Brackmann grading system.

RESULTS

We included 135 patients (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age, 55.3 ± 14.1 yr; 62 males). The most common CPA mass was VS (77%). Overall, the measured taste function was lower on the affected compared with the healthy side of the tongue (mean score, 9.8 ± 3.3 versus 11 ± 2.9; p < 0.0001). Looking for clinically relevant one-sided taste impairment revealed 18 (13.3%) patients with hemi-ageusia, but only 4 (30.8%) of those subjectively complained of taste dysfunction. Regarding VS, Koos IV masses presented the lowest score on the affected side (mean score, 7.5 ± 3.7). Six patients presented with facial palsy. Having facial palsy did not result in a lower Taste Strips score (p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

Before any CPA mass treatment, a measurable ipsilateral decrease in gustatory function is present in many patients. Most patients do not notice this preexisting taste impairment. From a medicolegal standpoint, this warrants consideration. To avoid postoperative claims regarding taste function, a preoperative assessment may be considered.

Quality of Life for Patients with Sporadic Small Vestibular Schwannomas Following Middle Fossa Craniotomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate quality-of-life outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study from 2018 to 2023.

SETTING

Tertiary academic institution.

PATIENTS

Adults with sporadic VS.

INTERVENTIONS

MCF.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the change in preoperative and 1-year postoperative Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-life (PANQOL) scores. Secondary outcome measures included hearing preservation and facial nerve function.

RESULTS

Of the 164 patients who underwent MCF for sporadic VS, 78 patients elected to voluntarily complete preoperative PANQOL assessments prior to surgery. Seventy-one (91%) of those 78 patients completed postoperative PANQOL surveys. Fifty (70%) of the respondents were female and the median age was 48 years (range, 27-71 years). Overall, at 1-year postsurgery, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was obtained in the hearing (mean difference, 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-16.7) and anxiety (mean difference, 18.8; 95% CI, 11.7-25.9) domains. For patients with hearing preservation (n = 48, 68%), MCIDs were reached in the hearing (mean difference, 13.4; 95% CI, 6.3-20.6), anxiety (mean difference, 20.8; 95% CI, 11.8-29.9), energy (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8), pain (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8) domains, and overall PANQOL scores (mean difference, 12.7; 95% CI, 7.1-18.3). Postoperatively, 64 (90%) patients maintained a House-Brackmann I.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining disease-specific QOL for VS patients undergoing MCF. Based on our institution's experience, MCF approach for small VS is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in QOL, hearing preservation, and excellent facial nerve outcomes.

Development and Initial Validation of a Meniere's Disease Quality of Life Instrument: The MenQOL

OBJECTIVE

To design and validate a disease-specific quality of life instrument for Meniere's disease.

METHODS

We used a sequential process of expert input, patient focus groups, and analyses of responses to draft questionnaires to create a 24-item Meniere's disease quality of life (MenQOL) instrument. The MenQOL and the SF-36v2 were administered to a cohort of 50 patients with Meniere's disease and 60 comparison patients with tinnitus, vertigo, or hearing loss from other causes identified at a tertiary academic center. We performed exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's α, between group comparisons of total MenQOL scores, and regression analyses between the MenQOL and SF-36v2 to evaluate the instrument's factor structure, internal consistency, face validity, and external validity. Segregation of the instrument into domains was assessed by exploratory factor analysis.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the MenQOL has a single domain. Cronbach's α = 0.914 indicated high internal consistency for the instrument as a whole. Mean MenQOL scores showing significantly worse quality of life among patients with Meniere's disease than comparison participants (52.5 ± 15.8 vs. 43.2 ± 12.6; p = 0.0051), indicating good construct validity. Significant inverse relationships in bivariate linear regressions between total MenQOL scores and SF-36v2 physical (slope = -0.94, p < 0.0001) and mental (slope = -1.16, p < 0.0001) composite scores showed acceptable concurrent validity.

CONCLUSIONS

We have described the initial development of the MenQOL, a simple, valid patient-reported outcome measure that, subject to further study, may be used to assess the effects of treatment on disease-specific quality of life in patients with Meniere's disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Long-term quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma

Background

While previous studies have assessed patient reported quality of life (QOL) of various vestibular schwannoma (VS) treatment modalities, few studies have assessed QOL as related to the amount of residual tumor and need for retreatment in a large series of patients. Objective: To assess patient reported QOL outcomes following VS resection with a focus on extent of resection and retreatment.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed using single-center institutional data of adult patients who underwent VS resection by the senior authors between 1989-2018 at Loyola University Medical Center. The Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) survey was sent to all patients via postal mail.

Results

Fifty-five percent of 367 total patients were female with a mean age of 61.6 years (SD 12.63). The mean period between surgery and PANQOL response was 11.4 years (IQR: 4.74-7.37). The median tumor size was 2 cm (IQR: 1.5-2.8). The mean total PANQOL score was 70 (SD 19). Patients who required retreatment reported lower overall scores (μdiff = -10.11, 95% CI: -19.48 to -0.74; p = 0.03) and face domain scores (μdiff = -20.34, 95% CI: -29.78 to -10.91; p < .001). There was no association between extent of resection and PANQOL scores in any domain.

Conclusion

In an analysis of 367 patients who underwent microsurgical resection of VS, extent of resection did not affect PANQOL scores in contrast to previous reports in the literature, while the need for retreatment and facial function had a significant impact on patient-reported outcomes.

Exploring the influence of appearance evaluation apprehension: How fear of negative evaluation affects quality of life in people with Vestibular Schwannoma

People diagnosed with Vestibular Schwannoma (VS) can experience several symptoms both pre and post-treatment. These, alongside the diagnosis experience, can significantly impact their daily life. The present research is a continuation of a larger study aiming to explore the impacts of symptomology and body image/fear of negative evaluation (FNAE) on the quality of life (QOL) for people with VS. The research design was exploratory and involved a nationwide survey with a total of 52 participants. FNAE was assessed using a measurement of the same name, and QOL was assessed using the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life scale (PANQOL). Comparing management groups revealed a significant difference in FNAE with higher scores for surgery compared to radiation treatment. Regression analyses revealed that FNAE significantly accounted for 10.9% of the variance in QOL. However, no symptom was significantly predictive of FNAE. In conclusion, VS is associated with several symptoms that can persist post-treatment. Body satisfaction contributes to QOL and may differ between management types. However, due to inconclusive findings on the predictability of symptoms on FNAE, other moderator factors could influence these direct relationships. Future studies should evaluate the variables that could mitigate or protect from the impacts of FNAE for this population.

Quality assessment of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with multiple ear complaints

INTRODUCTION

There is an increased demand for well-validated PROMs in otology. This study will systematically assess the methodological quality of all published patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) for patients with multiple ear complaints and to identify the best suitable PROM for use by clinicians treating patients with multiple ear complaints.

METHODS

An extensive systematic mapping review of all otology questionnaires was performed to identify questionnaires measuring multiple ear complaints. The 'Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement Instruments' (COSMIN) checklists were used to evaluate the quality of the questionnaire by two researchers. The worst item score per aspect of the methodological assessment counted.

RESULTS

Twelve multiple-complaint questionnaires were included in the study for quality assessment. Ten questionnaires were disease-specific (COMQ-12, CES, ZCMEI-21, MD-POSI, PAN-QOL, ETDQ-7, MDOQ, GYSSCDQ, COMOT-15 and DEU-MDDS). Two questionnaires were ear domain-specific (OQUA and COQOL). The majority of multiple complaint questionnaires lacked good design with concept elicitation and patient involvement.

CONCLUSION

For the majority of questionnaires, the quality assessment was inadequate as only a few authors consulted with patients affected by the complaints in the development. Modifications of earlier versions of PROMS or combinations of multiple questionnaires lead to ongoing (cross-cultural) validation of these questionnaires albeit mediocre design and validation. The two domain-specific questionnaires are the COQOL and OQUA, both with adequate quality but different focus. COQOL to quantify the quality of life and OQUA to measure and evaluate the severity and impact of ear complaints. [Correction added on 26 January 2024, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, the spelling of the abbreviation COQOL has been corrected in this version.].

Socioeconomic determinants impact quality of life at vestibular schwannoma diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic variables including race, education, and income have been shown to affect vestibular schwannoma incidence, treatment, and outcomes. We sought to determine the impact of socioeconomic factors on quality of life at the time of vestibular schwannoma diagnosis.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary academic center. All patients evaluated for vestibular schwannoma from March 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021 who completed at least one Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) questionnaire at presentation or prior to any intervention were included. PANQOL scores were compared across income quintiles, racial groups, and health insurance categories.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and ninety-six patients who had non-missing information on variables of interest were included. Compared to White/Caucasian patients (84.5 %), Black/African American patients (4.7 %) had significantly lower PANQOL total scores (b = -12.8[-21.7, -4.0], p = 0.005). Compared to patients with Commercial insurance (53 %), patients who were Uninsured/ Self-pay (1.7 %) had significantly lower PANQOL total scores (b = -16.7[-31.4, -1.9], p = 0.027). Patients in higher income quintiles had significantly higher PANQOL total scores (b = 11.7[3.9, 19.5], p = 0.004 comparing highest income quintile to lowest). After controlling for potential confounders, income quintile (b = 9.6[1.3, 17.9], p = 0.023 comparing highest quintile to lowest) and insurance (b = -17.0[-31.9, -21], p = 0.025 comparing Uninsured/Self-pay to Commercial insurance) remained predictors of total PANQOL score.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic factors including race, health insurance, and income appear to contribute to quality of life at the time of vestibular schwannoma diagnosis. These variables are interrelated and the effects of race may be mediated in part by differences in income and health insurance coverage.

Quality of life and broader experiences of those with acoustic neuroma: a mixed methods approach

Background Acoustic neuromas (ANs) are consistently associated with decreased quality of life (QOL) related to the physical and psychosocial impacts of symptoms experienced from the tumour and its treatment. This study explored patient-reported experiences of ANs in New Zealand, with a focus on the impact on QOL and the provision of information, support and services. Methods A mixed methods approach was taken, conducting an online community survey that included the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life Scale (N  = 52). Those who indicated interest were offered semi-structured interviews after the survey (N  = 17), which were analysed using content analysis. Results A negative impact on QOL was found, highlighting five key themes in the experiences of people: (1) ongoing physical, social and psychological impacts; (2) information and support from the medical system; (3) autonomy and decision-making; (4) the importance of peer support; and (5) remaining positive - life goes on. Conclusions Our findings indicate areas for improvement that may benefit people's healthcare experience and QOL. Both quantitative and qualitative results identified gaps associated with person-centred care and the need for information, education, emotional support and access to services. Recommendations include a need for more information (verbal and written) during all stages of diagnosis and treatment, shared decision-making and increased access to allied health, including psychological services and support groups.

The added value of the artificial intelligence patient-reported experience measure (AI-PREM tool) in clinical practise: Deployment in a vestibular schwannoma care pathway

Objectives

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) can be used for the improvement of quality of care. In this study, the outcome of an open-ended question PREM combined with computer-assisted analysis is compared to the outcome of a closed-ended PREM questionnaire.

Methods

This survey study assessed the outcome of the open-ended questionnaire PREM and a close-ended question PREM of patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma in a tertiary vestibular schwannoma expert centre.

Results

The open-ended questions PREM, consisting of five questions, was completed by 507 participants and resulted in 1508 positive and 171 negative comments, categorised into 27 clusters. The close-ended questions PREM results were mainly positive (overall experience graded as 8/10), but did not identify specific action points. Patients who gave high overall scores (>8) on the close-ended question provided points for improvement in the open-ended question PREM, which would have been missed using the close-ended questions only.

Conclusions

Compared to the close-ended question PREM, the open-ended question PREM provides more detailed and specific information about the patient experience in the vestibular schwannoma care pathway.

Innovation

Automated analysis of feedback with the open-ended question PREM revealed relevant insights and identified topics for targeted quality improvement, whereas the close-ended PREM did not.

The effect of symptomatology and mental wellbeing on quality of life in people with acoustic neuroma

INTRODUCTION

Acoustic neuroma (AN) research largely employs a medical framework to understand health outcomes. An alternative is to examine quality of life (QOL) outcomes. This study explored whether mental well-being (i.e., anxiety and depression) were predictive of QOL in those with AN over and above symptomatology.

METHODS

A nationwide online survey was distributed to 24 community organisations. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of AN irrespective of the treatment approach. There were 52 respondents. Mental well-being was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and quality of life was assessed using Penn Acoustic Neuroma QOL scale (PANQOL).

RESULTS

The most frequently reported symptoms reported were poor balance, tinnitus, hearing loss, and headache. Preliminary analyses suggested that headaches, tinnitus and mental well-being were significantly correlated with QOL. Hierarchical regression revealed that these two symptoms and mental well-being accounted for 18.7% and 51.1% of the variance in QOL, respectively. In addition, there was a significant difference in depression scores between management types, with the surgery group having a significantly higher depression score than the radiation group.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms and mood contribute to QOL for those diagnosed with AN. This can be understood through the common-sense model and fear of cancer recurrence. Screening for psychological difficulties should be provided from the point of diagnosis to post-treatment to allow for targeted management plans to mitigate the effects of these on QOL.

Patient-preferred outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a qualitative content analysis of symptoms, side effects and their impact on health-related quality of life

PURPOSE

During counseling and management of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS), the emphasis is shifting from tumour control and nerve preservation towards maintaining or improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Understanding the patients' perspective and impact of VS is, therefore, of utmost importance. The current study aimed to identify treatment outcomes preferred by patients and to explore the patient-reported VS symptoms and management-related side effects and their impact on HRQoL.

METHODS

Patients with VS were contacted through the Dutch VS association Stichting Hoormij and questioned using a semi-structured, cross-sectional online survey. Patients were asked to report and rank symptoms and side effects, with their impact on HRQoL and frequency of occurrence. Results were structured through qualitative content analysis. Coded symptoms, side effects, impacts, frequencies, and patient-preferred outcomes were analysed and summarized with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 231 respondents, 71% were actively treated. Hearing (symptoms vs. side effects: 78.8% vs. 63.6%), balance (62.3%; 48.8%), and energy issues (33.8%; 32.6%) were the most frequently mentioned symptoms and management-related side effects. Fatigue, deafness, headaches, and hearing loss had the highest impact on HRQoL. The majority of patients identified hearing preservation (61%), balance preservation (38.5%), and reduced tinnitus (34.6%) to be the patient-preferred outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This qualitative study demonstrates that in this population many patients with VS encounter participation difficulties in their daily physical and social activities and value hearing and balance preservation, reduced tinnitus, and restored energy as preferred outcomes as they are hampered by symptoms and side effects related to hearing, balance, and energy. Healthcare professionals should consider these key points and use these and the patient-preferred outcomes in consultation, shared decision making, treatment, and follow-up to optimize patient-centred care.

Upfront Radiosurgery vs a Wait-and-Scan Approach for Small- or Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma: The V-REX Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Current guidelines for treating small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma recommend either upfront radiosurgery or waiting to treat until tumor growth has been detected radiographically.

Objective

To determine whether upfront radiosurgery provides superior tumor volume reduction to a wait-and-scan approach for small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized clinical trial of 100 patients with a newly diagnosed (<6 months) unilateral vestibular schwannoma and a maximal tumor diameter of less than 2 cm in the cerebellopontine angle as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were enrolled at the Norwegian National Unit for Vestibular Schwannoma from October 28, 2014, through October 3, 2017; 4-year follow-up ended on October 20, 2021.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to receive either upfront radiosurgery (n = 50) or to undergo a wait-and-scan protocol, for which treatment was given only upon radiographically documented tumor growth (n = 50). Participants underwent 5 annual study visits consisting of clinical assessment, radiological examination, audiovestibular tests, and questionnaires.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the ratio between tumor volume at the trial end at 4 years and baseline (V4:V0). There were 26 prespecified secondary outcomes, including patient-reported symptoms, clinical examinations, audiovestibular tests, and quality-of-life outcomes. Safety outcomes were the risk of salvage microsurgery and radiation-associated complications.

Results

Of the 100 randomized patients, 98 completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 54 years; 42% female). In the upfront radiosurgery group, 1 participant (2%) received repeated radiosurgery upon tumor growth, 2 (4%) needed salvage microsurgery, and 45 (94%) had no additional treatment. In the wait-and-scan group, 21 patients (42%) received radiosurgery upon tumor growth, 1 (2%) underwent salvage microsurgery, and 28 (56%) remained untreated. For the primary outcome of the ratio of tumor volume at the trial end to baseline, the geometric mean V4:V0 was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.15) in the upfront radiosurgery group and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23-1.84) in the wait-and-scan group, showing a significantly greater tumor volume reduction in patients treated with upfront radiosurgery (wait-and-scan to upfront radiosurgery ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.23-2.44; P = .002). Of 26 secondary outcomes, 25 showed no significant difference. No radiation-associated complications were observed.

Conclusion and relevance

Among patients with newly diagnosed small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, upfront radiosurgery demonstrated a significantly greater tumor volume reduction at 4 years than a wait-and-scan approach with treatment upon tumor growth. These findings may help inform treatment decisions for patients with vestibular schwannoma, and further investigation of long-term clinical outcomes is needed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02249572.

Impact of Management Strategies on New-Onset Mental Health Disorders and Associated Health Care Utilization in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the impact of different management strategies on diagnosis of new-onset mental health disorders (MHDs) in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) and health care utilization at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

MarketScan databases were queried using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition, 2000-2020. We included patients ≥18 years old with a diagnosis of VS who underwent clinical observation, surgery, or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with at least 1 year of follow-up. We looked at health care outcomes and MHDs at 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The database search identified 23,376 patients. Of these, 94.2% (n = 22,041) were managed conservatively with clinical observation at the initial diagnosis, and 2% (n = 466) underwent surgery. The surgery cohort had the highest incidence of new-onset MHDs followed by SRS and clinical observation cohorts at 3 months (surgery: 17%; SRS: 12%; clinical observation: 7%), 6 months (surgery: 20%; SRS: 16%; clinical observation: 10%), and 12 months (surgery: 27%; SRS: 23%; clinical observation: 16%) (P < 0.0001). The median difference in combined payments between patients with and without MHDs was highest in the surgery cohort followed by SRS and clinical observation cohorts at all time points (12 months: surgery: $14,469; SRS: $10,557; clinical observation: $6439; P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with clinical observation only, patients who underwent surgery for VS were 2 times more likely and patients who underwent SRS were 1.5 times more likely to develop MHDs with corresponding increase in health care utilization at 1-year follow-up.

Quality of Life in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma

The focus of management in sporadic vestibular schwannoma has dramatically evolved over the last 100 years. The centrality of quality of life (QoL) is being underscored by an ongoing epidemiologic shift toward an older patient demographic that is being diagnosed with smaller tumors and often with few associated symptoms. Two disease-specific QoL instruments have been developed for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life Scale in 2010, and more recently, the Mayo Clinic Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life Index in 2022. The current article examines disease-specific quality-of-life outocmes in the management of ssporadic vestibular schwannoma.

Long-Term Quality of Life of Vestibular Schwannoma Patients: A Longitudinal Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Vestibular schwannoma management aims to maintain optimal quality of life (QoL) while preventing severe sequelae of the tumor or its treatment. This study assessed long-term QoL of patients with vestibular schwannoma in relation to treatment modality and decisional regret.

STUDY DESIGN

A longitudinal study, in which clinical and QoL data were used that were cross-sectionally acquired in 2014 and again in 2020 from the same patient group.

SETTING

A tertiary expert center for vestibular schwannoma care in the Netherlands.

METHODS

QoL was measured by the Penn Acoustic Quality of Life (PANQOL) scale. Changes in time were assed using a linear mixed model. In addition, the Decision Regret Scale was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 867 patients, 536 responded (62%), with a median follow-up of 11 years. All PANQOL subdomain scores remained stable over time and did not exceed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) levels. Time since treatment did not affect QoL. Patients had comparable average QoL scores and proportions of patients with changing QoL scores (ie, exceeding the MCID) over time, irrespective of the received initial treatment. Female patients and those who required salvage therapy (either by radiotherapy or surgery) reported a lower QoL. The latter patient group reported the highest decisional regret.

CONCLUSION

On average, the long-term QoL of patients with vestibular schwannoma is comparable for patients under active surveillance and those who have received active treatment, and it remains stable over time. This suggests that, on average, preservation of QoL of patients with vestibular schwannoma is feasible when adequately managed.

Vestibular Complaints Impact on the Long-Term Quality of Life of Vestibular Schwannoma Patients

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of dizziness-related symptoms on the long-term quality of life (QoL) of patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 completed a disease-specific QoL questionnaire (Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life [PANQOL]) and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) in 2020. Linear regression was performed to assess the correlation between QoL and the DHI total score, and the scores of the DHI functional, emotional, and physical subdomains. Potential confounders such as age, sex, tumor size at baseline, and treatment modality (active surveillance, surgery, or radiotherapy) were included in the model.

RESULTS

In total, 287 of 479 patients (59%) experienced dizziness with a median follow-up of 10 years. The DHI total score was significantly associated with the PANQOL total score. On average, we found a reduction of 0.7 points on the PANQOL for each additional point on the DHI. The DHI emotional subdomain was the most prominent determinant of poorer QoL. Each point on the DHI emotional subscale was associated with a reduction of 1.3 on the PANQOL score. Treatment modality did not have a clinically relevant effect on dizziness-related QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Even mild dizziness can have a significant and clinically relevant effect on the QoL of patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma in the long term. This holds true for all treatment modalities. Addressing the vestibular problems may improve QoL in vestibular schwannoma patients, and DHI subscale analysis may help tailor the optimal vestibular intervention.

Prospective phase II trial of the dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor vistusertib for progressive or symptomatic meningiomas in persons with neurofibromatosis 2

Background

Meningiomas occur in 80% of persons with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and cause significant mortality and morbidity, yet there are no effective medical treatments. NF2-deficient tumors have constitutive activation of mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and treatment with mTORC1 inhibitors results in growth arrest in a minority of tumors, with paradoxical activation of the mTORC2/AKT pathway. We studied the effect of vistusertib, a dual mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor, in NF2 patients with progressive or symptomatic meningiomas.

Methods

Vistusertib was administered orally at 125 mg twice daily for 2 consecutive days each week. The primary endpoint was the imaging response in the target meningioma, defined as a volume decrease of 20% compared with the baseline. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, imaging response of nontarget tumors, quality of life, and genetic biomarkers.

Results

Eighteen participants (13 female), median age of 41 (range, 18-61) years, were enrolled. In target meningiomas, the best response was partial response (PR) in 1/18 tumors (6%) and stable disease (SD) in 17/18 tumors (94%). For all measured intracranial meningiomas and vestibular schwannomas, the best imaging response was PR in 6/59 tumors (10%) and SD in 53 (90%). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 14 (78%) participants, and 9 participants discontinued treatment due to side effects.

Conclusions

Although the study did not meet the primary endpoint, vistusertib treatment was associated with high rates of SD in progressive NF2-related tumors. However, this dosing regimen for vistusertib was poorly tolerated. Future studies of dual mTORC inhibitors for NF2 should focus on optimizing tolerability and evaluating the relevance of tumor stability in participants.

Skull Base Registries: A Roadmap

Hospitals, payors, and patients increasingly expect us to report our outcomes in more detail and to justify our treatment decisions and costs. Although there are many stakeholders in surgical outcomes, physicians must take the lead role in defining how outcomes are assessed. Skull base lesions interact with surrounding anatomy to produce a complex spectrum of presentations and surgical challenges, requiring a wide variety of surgical approaches. Moreover, many skull base lesions are relatively rare. These factors and others often preclude the use of prospective randomized clinical trials, thus necessitating alternate methods of scientific inquiry. In this paper, we propose a roadmap for implementing a skull base registry, along with expected benefits and challenges.

Audiovestibular symptoms and facial nerve function comparing microsurgery versus SRS for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgery and radiosurgery represent the most common treatment options for vestibular schwannoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the outcomes of surgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

The Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched through 01/2021 to find all studies on surgical and stereotactic procedures performed to treat vestibular schwannoma. Using a random-effects model, pooled odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing post- to pre-intervention were derived for pre-post studies, and pooled incidence of adverse events post-intervention were calculated for case series and stratified by intervention type.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (18 pre-post design; three case series) with 987 patients were included in the final analysis. Comparing post- to pre-intervention, both surgery (OR: 3.52, 95%CI 2.13, 5.81) and SRS (OR: 3.30, 95%CI 1.39, 7.80) resulted in greater odds of hearing loss, lower odds of dizziness (surgery OR: 0.10; 95%CI 0.02, 0.47 vs. SRS OR: 0.22; 95%CI 0.05, 0.99), and tinnitus (surgery OR: 0.23; 95%CI 0.00, 37.9; two studies vs. SRS OR: 0.11; 95%CI 0.01, 1.07; one study). Pooled incidence of facial symmetry loss was larger post-surgery (14.3%, 95%CI 6.8%, 22.7%) than post-SRS (7%, 95%CI 1%, 36%). Tumor control was larger in the surgery (94%, 95%CI 83%, 98%) than the SRS group (80%, 95%CI 31%, 97%) for small-to-medium size tumors.

CONCLUSION

Both surgery and SRS resulted in similar odds of hearing loss and similar improvements in dizziness and tinnitus among patients with vestibular schwannoma; however, facial symmetry loss appeared higher post-surgery.

Postoperative Impact of Pontocerebellar Angle Surgery on the Quality of Life in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

BACKGROUND

Vestibular Schwannomas are benign tumors arising from the VIII CN. Surgical treatment is indicated in case of tumors larger than 2.5 cm in the cerebellopontine angle or in the case of cranial nerve dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the QoL by means of the PANQOL questionnaire in a group of surgically treated patients mainly affected by large and giant VS Methods: All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative otoneurological evaluation and gadolinium enhanced MRI and they completed, independently, the PANQOL questionnaire at last follow up.

RESULTS

70% of patients presented with large Koos III or IV VS Each domain of PANQOL showed a strong correlation with the total PANQOL score. In relation to the postoperative facial nerve function, patients with poorer function showed significantly lower score in the facial dysfunction and pain, patients with postoperative balance problems showed a significantly lower PANQOL score for domains of balance and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that postoperative QoL of patients was acceptable even if there were some domains that were more affected, such as hearing and balance domains; therefore, the lowest scores suggest the need for vestibular rehabilitation programs and strategies that improve postoperative hearing.

Quality of life reporting in the management of posterior fossa tumours: A systematic review

Introduction

Survival amongst posterior fossa tumour (PFT) patients is improving. Clinical endpoints such as overall survival fail to depict QoL. There is yet to be a review of current QoL instruments used for adult PFTs. Aim of this review is to outline the QoL reporting in the management of PFTs and measure participation level.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. A search strategy to identify adult patients with PFTs who took part in QoL metrics was conducted. Observational and experimental studies published from 1990 to date were included. Studies with a sample size less than 10 and performance measures such as Karnofsky Performance Status were not considered.

Results

A total of 116 studies were included in the final analysis. Vestibular schwannomas were the most common tumour pathology (n = 23,886, 92.6%) followed by pilocytic astrocytomas (n = 657, 2.5%) and meningiomas (n = 437, 1.7%) Twenty-five different QoL measures were used in the study pool. SF-36 was the most common (n = 55, 17 47.4%) QoL metric in the whole study pool, followed by the Penn Acoustic Neuroma QoL scale (n = 24, 20.7%) and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (n = 16, 13.8%). Seventy-two studies reported less-than 100% participation in QoL evaluation. The commonest reason for non-participation was a lack of response (n = 1,718, 60.8%), incomplete questionnaires (n = 268, 9.4%) and cognitive dysfunction (n = 258, 9.1%).

Conclusion

Informed clinical decision-making in PFT patients requires the development of specific QoL outcomes. Core outcome sets, and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) are essential for these metrics to show clinically significant improvements in patient QoL.

Development and validation of a new disease-specific quality of life instrument for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: the Mayo Clinic Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life Index

OBJECTIVE

Facial nerve function, hearing preservation, and tumor control have been the primary benchmarks used to assess vestibular schwannoma (VS) outcomes. Acknowledging the frequent discrepancy between what physicians prioritize and what patients value, there has been increasing prioritization of patient-reported outcome measures when evaluating the impact of VS diagnosis and its treatment. Motivated by reported limitations of prior instruments used to assess quality of life (QOL) in patients with VS, the authors describe the development and validation of a new disease-specific QOL measure: the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index.

METHODS

The content development phase comprised identification of clinically important domains and prioritization of feelings or concerns individuals with VS may have. The validation phase encompassed determining how items were grouped into domains and eliminating redundant items. Both phases leveraged data from cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys, expertise from a multidisciplinary working group, and patients with a broad range of experiences with VS (n = 42 during content development and n = 263 during validation). Domain scores from the new instrument were assessed for reliability and correlation with other measures of similar constructs.

RESULTS

The VSQOL Index consists of 40 items that evaluate the impact of VS diagnosis and its management on QOL, treatment satisfaction, and employment and is estimated to take 8-10 minutes to complete. Domain scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) and demonstrate excellent psychometric properties, including content, construct, and convergent validity and both internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas 0.83 to 0.91) and test-retest reliability (reliability coefficients 0.86 to 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The VSQOL Index is a valid and reliable measure that overcomes several limitations of prior instruments, including omission or underrepresentation of domains that frequently impact well-being, such as pain, cognition, satisfaction or regret surrounding treatment decisions, and occupational limitations, to comprehensively evaluate the impact of VS diagnosis or its treatment on QOL.

Occipital Neuralgia following Acoustic Neuroma Resection

Background While postoperative outcomes of acoustic neuroma (AN) resection commonly consider hearing preservation and facial function, headache is a critical quality of life factor. Postoperative headache is described in the literature; however, there is limited discussion specific to occipital neuralgia (ON) following AN resection.

Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of conservative management and surgery.

Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 872 AN patients who underwent resection at our institution between 1988 and 2017 and identified 15 patients (1.9%) that met International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for ON.

Results Of the 15 ON patients, surgical approaches included 13 (87%) retrosigmoid (RS), one (7%) translabyrinthine (TL), and one (7%) combined RS + TL. Mean clinical follow-up was 119 months (11–263). Six (40%) patients obtained pain relief through conservative management, while the remaining nine (60%) underwent surgery or ablative procedure. Three (38%) patients received an external neurolysis, four (50%) received a neurectomy, one (13%) had both procedures, and one (13%) received two C2 to 3 radio frequency ablations. Of the nine patients who underwent procedural ON treatment, seven (78%) patients achieved pain relief, one patient (11%) continued to have pain, and one patient (11%) was lost to follow-up. Of the six patients whose pain was controlled with conservative management and nerve blocks, five (83%) found relief by using neuropathic pain medication and one (17%) found relief on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Conclusion Our series demonstrates success with conservative management in some, but overall a minority (40%) of patients, reserving decompression only for refractory cases.

Quality of Life After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: A Question of Perspective

Objective

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self-reported outcome measures have a relevant impact on the medical decision-making process. They capture either the current status and allow for multiple prospective evaluations in the course of a treatment or rely on the retrospective comparison of health of patients before and after an intervention to assess its benefit. Importantly, these patient-assessed measures may be influenced by psychological factors. We compared HRQoL and perceived benefit in the course of surgical vestibular schwannoma (VS) treatment, as assessed by the patients from a prospective and retrospective point-of-view, and evaluated the influence of co-morbid depression.

Methods

Within a prospective observational single-center study, forty-three patients with VS were investigated before and after retrosigmoid tumor resection. SF-36, Beck Depression Inventory and patient-assessed clinical symptoms were acquired before surgery and at follow-up. At follow-up, the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) was acquired as well.

Results

SF-36 scores were significantly lower than the age and sex matched normative data in six and three out of eight categories before and after surgery, respectively. Three categories improved significantly after vs. before surgery; one of them (global health) reached a minimal clinical important difference. In contrast, patients reported predominantly a deterioration, when asked for a retrospective evaluation of the benefit (i.e., GBI). Depression correlated with both SF-36 and GBI, determined dissatisfaction, improved significantly after surgery and was the measure that had the largest impact on HRQoL.

Conclusion

Prospective and retrospective HRQoL measures may lead to different findings and can be confounded by psychological factors.

Cognitive and psychosocial outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma

BACKGROUND

Acoustic Neuroma (AN) is a benign tumour of the eighth cranial nerve. Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment approach. Studies have explored the primary effects of SRS and documented equivalent efficacy for tumour control compared to neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the longer term cognitive and psychosocial outcomes of SRS in non-Neurofibromatosis Type II patients utilising both objective and subjective cognitive outcomes associated with quality of life and health related distress.

METHODS

Nineteen individuals treated via SRS were assessed using a battery of standardised psychometric tests as well as measures of quality of life and psychological distress.

RESULTS

Participants had largely preserved cognitive function except for processing speed, aspects of attention and visual memory relative to age norms. Self-reported quality of life was better than in other AN population studies. Level of psychological distress was equivalent to general population norms. More than half of participants reported subjective cognitive decline though this was not fully supported by objective testing. Subjective cognitive complaints may be associated with lower reported quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Results are largely consistent with previous findings on the effects of SRS in other clinical groups, which supports SRS as a targeted radiation treatment for AN.

Response rate of patient reported outcomes: the delivery method matters

BACKGROUND

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are subjective outcomes of disease and/or treatment in clinical research. For effective evaluations of PROs, high response rates are crucial. This study assessed the impact of the delivery method on the patients' response rate.

METHODS

A cohort of patients with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma (a condition with substantial impact on quality of life, requiring prolonged follow-up) was assigned to three delivery methods: email, regular mail, and hybrid. Patients were matched for age and time since the last visit to the outpatient clinic. The primary outcome was the response rate, determinants other than delivery mode were age, education and time since the last consultation. In addition, the effect of a second reminder by telephone was evaluated.

RESULTS

In total 602 patients participated in this study. The response rates for delivery by email, hybrid, and mail were 45, 58 and 60%, respectively. The response rates increased after a reminder by telephone to 62, 67 and 64%, respectively. A lower response rate was associated with lower level of education and longer time interval since last outpatient clinic visit.

CONCLUSION

The response rate for PRO varies by delivery method. PRO surveys by regular mail yield the highest response rate, followed by hybrid and email delivery methods. Hybrid delivery combines good response rates with the ease of digitally returned questionnaires.

Current Recommendations for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Domains of Quality of Life in Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

To review and recommend patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures assessing multidimensional domains of quality of life (QoL) to use as clinical endpoints in medical and psychosocial trials for children and adults with neurofibromatosis (NF) type 1, NF2, and schwannomatosis.

METHODS

The PRO working group of the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) International Collaboration used systematic methods to review, rate, and recommend existing self-report and parent-report PRO measures of generic and disease-specific QoL for NF clinical trials. Recommendations were based on 4 main criteria: patient characteristics, item content, psychometric properties, and feasibility.

RESULTS

The highest-rated generic measures were (1) the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales for NF clinical trials for children or for children through adults, (2) the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General for adult medical trials, and (3) the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF for adult psychosocial trials. The highest-rated disease-specific measures were (1) the PedsQL NF1 Module for NF1 trials, (2) the NF2 Impact on Quality of Life Scale for NF2 trials, and (3) the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life Scale for NF2 trials targeting vestibular schwannomas. To date, there are no disease-specific tools assessing multidimensional domains of QoL for schwannomatosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The REiNS Collaboration currently recommends these generic and disease-specific PRO measures to assess multidimensional domains of QoL for NF clinical trials. Additional research is needed to further evaluate the use of these measures in both medical and psychosocial trials.

Patient Report of Hearing in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Recommendations for Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate published patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of hearing function and hearing-related quality of life (QoL) and recommend measures selected by the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis International Collaboration (REiNS) as endpoints for clinical trials in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2).

METHODS

The REiNS Patient-Reported Outcomes Working Group systematically evaluated published patient-reported outcome measures of (1) hearing function and (2) hearing-related QoL for individuals with hearing loss of various etiologies using previously published REiNS rating procedures. Ten measures of hearing functioning and 11 measures of hearing-related QoL were reviewed. Measures were numerically scored and compared primarily on their participant characteristics (including participant age range and availability of normative data), item content, psychometric properties, and feasibility for use in clinical trials.

RESULTS

The Self-Assessment of Communication and the Self-Assessment of Communication-Adolescent were identified as most useful for adult and pediatric populations with NF2, respectively, for the measurement of both hearing function and hearing-related QoL. Measures were selected for their strengths in participant characteristics, item content, psychometric properties, and feasibility for use in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

REiNS recommends the Self-Assessment of Communication adult and adolescent forms for the assessment of patient-reported hearing function and hearing-related QoL for NF2 clinical trials. Further work is needed to demonstrate the utility of these measures in evaluating pharmacologic or behavioral interventions.

The Relationship Between the Functional Gait Assessment and Quality-of-Life Data in Patients Undergoing Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) and quality of life (QOL) measurements relating to balance before and after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and to assess the role of preoperative FGA in predicting postoperative QOL.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective clinical study of adult patients undergoing VS resection between September 2018 and December 2019. FGA was administered 1 week before and after surgery. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) were administered preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively.

SETTING

Single tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Patients (age ≥ 18 years old) with VS undergoing microsurgical resection. Excluded were patient with previous surgery or radiation.

INTERVENTION

VS resection.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome: correlation between FGA and QOL surveys. Secondary outcome: correlation between preoperative measurements of balance and postoperative PANQOL.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight patients were analyzed (mean age: 48 years old, 65.9% female). The translabyrinthine approach was most commonly performed. Under multivariate analysis, preoperative FGA significantly correlated with preoperative PANQOL balance score (p < 0.0001), preoperative PANQOL total score (p = 0.0002), and preoperative DHI (p < 0.0001). However, postoperative FGA did not significantly correlate with postoperative PANQOL balance or total scores (p = 0.446 and p = 0.4, respectively), or postoperative DHI (p = 0.3). Univariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative DHI and preoperative FGA were predictive of changes in postoperative PANQOL balance and total scores. However under multivariate analysis, preoperative FGA did not predict changes in postoperative PANQOL balance or total score (p = 0.24; p = 0.28, respectively). Preoperative DHI remained predictive of changes in postoperative PANQOL balance (p = 0.03) score but not of postoperative PANQOL total score (p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Although FGA and QOL data significantly correlated in the preoperative setting, our results did not suggest that preoperative FGA can be used to determine postoperative QOL. Additionally, the lack of correlation between FGA and QOL measurements in the acute postoperative setting suggests that further research is needed to determine contributors to postoperative QOL.

Perioperative Nimodipine to Improve Cranial Nerve Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Nimodipine has emerged as a promising strategy for protection of cranial nerves following vestibular schwannoma (VS) resections. Our goal was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of clinical studies to determine the therapeutic efficacy of nimodipine in improving facial nerve and cochlear nerve function.

DATABASE REVIEWED

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry, Clinicaltrials.gov, World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and EU Clinical Trials Registry to identify clinical studies up to May 11, 2020.

METHODS

We included studies evaluating perioperative administration of nimodipine as a strategy to prevent or treat facial nerve or cochlear nerve dysfunction following VS resections. Primary outcomes included preservation or recovery of House-Brackman scale for facial nerve function and Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for cochlear nerve function at the latest follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and administration strategies of nimodipine.

RESULTS

Nine studies (603 patients) met inclusion, of which seven studies (559 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis. Overall, nimodipine significantly increased the odds of cranial nerve recovery compared with controls (odds ratio [OR] 2.87, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [2.08, 3.95]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that nimodipine was only effective for cochlear nerve preservation (OR 2.78, 95% CI [1.74, 4.45]; I2 = 0%), but not for facial nerve function (OR 4.54, 95% CI [0.25, 82.42]; I2 = 33%).

CONCLUSION

Although there is evidence supporting the perioperative role of nimodipine for VS resections, more studies are warranted to help clarify the effects of nimodipine therapy on cranial nerve preservation.

Quality of life in patients of unilateral vestibular schwannoma treated with microsurgery: A South-Asian tertiary care Hospital experience

Majority of the published literature on the impact of microsurgery over quality-of-life (QOL) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients is retrospective in nature, with variable results, and there has been very little contribution from South-Asia. The authors designed this study to investigate the role of microsurgery in QOL alterations in VS patients, and to compare obtained QOL scores with that of control population. Between February 2017 and March 2018, a prospective/retrospective study was done at our institute. Prospective and retrospective cohorts included, 30 and 34 consecutive patients, respectively, of unilateral VS undergoing microsurgery. QOL assessment was done using Short Form-36 (SF-36), and the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-Of-Life (PANQOL) questionnaires. Prospective cohort underwent QOL assessment at 3 junctures - pre-surgery, 3-months & 1-year post-surgery; while retrospective cohort was assessed only once, at 1-year post-surgery. Age- & sex- matched normal population and diabetic patients were used as controls. In the prospective cohort, patients showed drop in all PANQOL domain/ SF-36 dimension scores at 3-month post-surgery, exception being vitality and general health in SF-36; showed improvement at 1-year follow-up, with majority either levelling or improving their respective pre-surgery scores. Gross total resection, tumors ≤ 3 cm, and age ≤ 45 years had better PANQOL scores at 1-year post-surgery across all the domains. Patients in both the cohorts showed worse QOL compared to normal population, but the gap got narrower at 1-year post-surgery. Our study adds a South-Asian perspective to the pool of prospective knowledge available on QOL following microsurgery in VS patients.

Contemporary Analysis of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Neurosurgical Literature

BACKGROUND

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is determined when a patient or physician defines the minimal change that outweighs the costs and untoward effects of a treatment. These measurements are "anchored" to validated quality-of-life instruments or physician-rated, disease-activity indices. To capture the subjective clinical experience in a measurable way, there is an increasing use of MCID.

OBJECTIVE

To review the overall concept, method of calculation, strengths, and weaknesses of MCID and its application in the neurosurgical literature.

METHODS

Recent articles were reviewed based on PubMed query. To illustrate the strengths and limitations of MCID, studies regarding the measurement of pain are emphasized and their impact on subsequent publications queried.

RESULTS

MCID varies by population baseline characteristics and calculation method. In the context of pain, MCID varied based on the quality of pain, chronicity, and treatment options.

CONCLUSION

MCID evaluates outcomes relative to whether they provide a meaningful change to patients, incorporating the risks and benefits of a treatment. Using MCID in the process of evaluating outcomes helps to avoid the error of interpreting a small but statistically significant outcome difference as being clinically important.

Quality of life in vestibular schwannoma: a comparison of three surgical techniques

OBJECTIVE

Through years, interest in quality of life (QoL) among patients affected by vestibular schwannoma (VS) has increased. The expansion of the indications for endoscopic ear surgery allowed the development of the transcanal transpromontorial surgery (TTS) for VS removal. The objective of the present study was to assess QoL in a cohort of VS patients operated on by translabyrinthine (TL), retrosigmoid (RS) and TTS approach.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 111 patients who underwent surgery for VS between January 2017 and January 2020 at two different institutions. Patients fulfilled three questionnaires during follow-up: Glasgow Benefit Inventory, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 and Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-Of-Life. The association between sex, age, date of surgery, tumor size, post-operative facial nerve (FN) function and QoL outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

An overall subjective impairment was demonstrated in all groups. Age, Koos staging and FN functions were associated to distinct QoL outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

QoL decreases in patients surgically treated for VS. The TTS may allow improved scores in many domains, confirming to be a subjectively well-tolerated technique.

Quality of Life in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients: A Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma following a single treatment modality: observation, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or microsurgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who had completed at least 2 Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) surveys.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment via SRS, microsurgery, or observation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PANQOL total survey and subdomain scores.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients (94 observations, 24 SRS, 16 microsurgeries) were included. The mean number of PANQOL surveys completed was 2.8 (range 2-5). The total PANQOL scores were significantly lower in the SRS group, but not the microsurgery group, compared with observation at the time of diagnosis (observation 550.4 ± 58.4; SRS 471.4 ± 37.4; microsurgery 492.6 ± 40.7; p = 0.03). Over time, there were no significant differences in the change of PANQOL scores across the 3 groups (SRS PANQOL score worsened 6.8/year compared with observation, p = 0.3; microsurgery PANQOL score worsened 7.8/year compared with observation, p = 0.5). Anxiety was the only subdomain that significantly worsened over time in the microsurgery group (microsurgery PANQOL score worsened 3.8/year compared with observation; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Despite differences in PANQOL scores at baseline, changes in total PANQOL score over time were not found to be statistically significant, regardless of the treatment group chosen. Overall, these results hold implications for patient counseling when considering treatment choice and quality of life predictions.

Comparing the impact of upfront radiosurgery versus expectation in vestibular schwannoma (the V-REX study): protocol for a randomised, observer-blinded, 4-year, parallel-group, single-centre, superiority study

INTRODUCTION

The optimal management of small-sized to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a matter of controversy. Clinical results of the prevailing treatment modalities (microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and conservative management (CM)) are documented, but comparative studies are few, and none are randomised or blinded. Upfront radiosurgery, or a careful follow-up by MRI with subsequent treatment on growth, are two strategies used at many centres. The present study aims at comparing these strategies by randomising individuals with newly diagnosed tumours to either upfront SRS or initial CM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Vestibular Schwannoma: Radiosurgery or Expectation study is designed as a randomised, controlled, observer-blinded, single-centre superiority trial with two parallel groups. Eligible patients will be randomised using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes, and the radiosurgery group will undergo standard Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) within 2 months following randomisation. The primary endpoint is tumour growth measured as volume ratio V_4years/V_baseline and volume doubling time, evaluated by annual T1 contrast MRI volumetric analysis. Secondary endpoints include symptom and sign development measured by clinical examination, audiovestibular tests, and by patient's responses to standardised validated questionnaires. In addition, the patient's working status, and the health economics involved with both strategies will be evaluated and compared. All outcome assessments will be performed by blinded observers. Power analysis indicates that 100 patients is sufficient to demonstrate the effect of GKRS on tumour volume.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Committee (23503) and funding from The Western Norway Regional Health Authority. Trial methods and results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 guidelines in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical trials: NCT02249572. Haukeland University Hospital record: 2014/314. Regional Ethical Committee (REC West): 23 503. The Western Norway Regional Health Authority: 912 281.

Prospective Study of Disease-Specific Quality-of-Life in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Comparing Observation, Radiosurgery, and Microsurgery

BACKGROUND

Previous cross-sectional studies analyzing quality of life (QOL) outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) have shown surprisingly little difference among treatment modalities. To date, there is limited prospective QOL outcome data available comparing baseline to posttreatment scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study using the disease-specific Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) scale.

SETTING

Large academic skull base center.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with unilateral VS who completed a baseline survey before treatment and at least one posttreatment survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in PANQOL scores from baseline to most recent survey.

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients were studied, including 78 (32%) who elected observation, 118 (48%) microsurgery, and 48 (20%) stereotactic radiosurgery. Patients who underwent microsurgery were younger (p < 0.001) and had larger tumors (p < 0.001) than those who underwent observation or radiosurgery; there was no significant difference in duration of follow-up among management groups (mean 2.1 yrs; p = 0.28). When comparing the total PANQOL score at baseline to the most recent survey, the net change was only -1.1, -0.1, and 0.3 points on a 100-point scale for observation, microsurgery, and radiosurgery, respectively (p = 0.89). After multivariable adjustment for baseline features, there were no statistically significant changes when comparing baseline to most recent scores within each management group for facial function, general health, balance, hearing loss, energy, and pain domains or total score. However, the microsurgical group experienced a 10.8-point improvement (p = 0.002) in anxiety following treatment, compared with 1.5 (p = 0.73) and 5.3 (p = 0.31) for observation and radiosurgery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective longitudinal study investigating differences in QOL outcomes among VS treatment groups using the disease-specific PANQOL instrument, treatment did not modify QOL in most domains. Microsurgery may confer an advantage with regard to patient anxiety, presumably relating to the psychological benefit of "cure" from having the tumor removed.

What determines quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma?

Objectives

Patients with a vestibular schwannoma (VS) experience a reduced quality of life (QoL). The main objective of this study was to determine the strongest predictors reducing physical and mental QoL from the disease‐specific Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) questionnaire in patients with VS.

Design

Observational study.

Setting

Radboudumc Skull Base Centre, Nijmegen.

Participants

Patients newly diagnosed with VS between 2014 and 2017 managed with either observation, stereotactic radiosurgery or microsurgery.

Main outcome measures

Quality of life was assessed using the disease‐specific PANQOL and general Short‐Form (36) Health Survey (SF‐36). Multiple linear regression models with PANQOL domains as predictors were used to determine the strongest predictors for SF‐36 QoL physical and mental health scores. Standardised beta coefficients (β) were used for ranking.

Results

A total of 174 patients (50% females, mean age 58.9 years) returned the questionnaires, providing a 69% response rate. Fifteen patients (9%) were treated with microsurgery, 29 (17%) with stereotactic radiosurgery and 130 patients (75%) were observed in a wait and scan strategy. A lack of energy (β = .28; P ≤ .001), lower general health (β = .22; P ≤ .001), headache (β = .16; P ≤ .001), anxiety (β = .15; P ≤ .001) and balance problems (β = .10; P ≤ .001) are the strongest predictors affecting physical health, while mental health is most affected by anxiety (β = .37; P ≤ .001), a lack of energy (β = .34; P ≤ .001), facial nerve dysfunction (β = .07; P ≤ .001), balance problems (β = .04; P ≤ .001) and headaches (β = .04; P ≤ .001).

Conclusion

A lack of energy, anxiety, headache and balance problems are the strongest predictors of both SF‐36 physical and mental QoL in patients with VS. More awareness and supportive care regarding energy, anxiety, headache and balance in informing, evaluating and treating patients with VS could improve QoL.

Surgical management for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The optimal management of large vestibular schwannomas continues to be debated. We constituted a task force comprising the members of the EANS skull base committee along with international experts to derive recommendations for the management of this problem from a European perspective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE database, in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines, was performed. A subgroup analysis screening all surgical series published within the last 20 years (January 2000 to March 2020) was performed. Weighted summary rates for tumor resection, oncological control, and facial nerve preservation were determined using meta-analysis models. This data along with contemporary practice patterns were discussed within the task force to generate consensual recommendations regarding preoperative evaluations, optimal surgical strategy, and follow-up management.

RESULTS

Tumor classification grades should be systematically used in the perioperative management of patients, with large vestibular schwannomas (VS) defined as > 30 mm in the largest extrameatal diameter. Grading scales for pre- and postoperative hearing (AAO-HNS or GR) and facial nerve function (HB) are to be used for reporting functional outcome. There is a lack of consensus to support the superiority of any surgical strategy with respect to extent of resection and use of adjuvant radiosurgery. Intraoperative neuromonitoring needs to be routinely used to preserve neural function. Recommendations for postoperative clinico-radiological evaluations have been elucidated based on the surgical strategy employed.

CONCLUSION

The main goal of management of large vestibular schwannomas should focus on maintaining/improving quality of life (QoL), making every attempt at facial/cochlear nerve functional preservation while ensuring optimal oncological control, thereby allowing to meet patient expectations. Despite the fact that this analysis yielded only a few Class B evidences and mostly expert opinions, it will guide practitioners to manage these patients and form the basis for future clinical trials.

Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Vestibular Schwannoma: A National Cross-sectional Study Comparing Microsurgery, Radiosurgery, and Observation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of treatment on disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS).

STUDY DESIGN

National cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center and the Acoustic Neuroma Association.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with VS who completed the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) survey. Patients were classified by treatment at the most recent survey as microsurgery, radiosurgery, observation, or recently diagnosed (RD). PANQOL scores were compared among VS treatment groups and with nontumor controls using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

A total of 1362 respondents with VS were analyzed. Total PANQOL scores differed significantly by treatment (P = .024) with adjusted means of 60, 63, 65, and 62 for the microsurgery, radiosurgery, observation, and RD groups, respectively. Subdomain scores for facial function, balance, hearing loss, and pain differed significantly (P < .05) by treatment. Comparisons that surpassed thresholds for clinical significance included microsurgery compared to radiosurgery and observation for facial function, microsurgery compared to observation and RD for hearing loss, and microsurgery compared to radiosurgery and observation for pain. Subdomain scores for anxiety, facial function, balance, hearing loss, energy, and pain and total PANQOL scores for nontumor controls were significantly higher (ie, more favorable) compared to the VS groups (P < .05). General health scores did not differ significantly between the nontumor controls and the VS groups (P = .19).

CONCLUSION

Differences in HRQOL among treatment modalities are small and variably exceed the minimal clinically important difference. The impact of a VS diagnosis on HRQOL supersedes that of the treatment type.

Hearing and Quality of Life Over Time in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients: Observation Compared to Stereotactic Radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine quality of life changes for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) undergoing observation or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients with VS who underwent observation or SRS and had at least two audiograms and Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) surveys, a quality of life survey for patients with VS.

INTERVENTIONS

SRS or observation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pure-tone average (PTA), speech discrimination score (SDS), PANQOL score; controlling for tumor size, baseline hearing, and other factors.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria: 89 underwent observation and 34 SRS. There was no significant difference in the rate of decline measured by PTA (PTA worsened at a rate of 0.25 dB/yr more in the observation group compared with the SRS group, p = 0.77) and SDS (SDS worsened at a rate of 2.1%/yr more in the SRS group compared with the observation group, p = 0.82). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the SRS group had a higher probability to progress to class D hearing over observation (hazard ratio 7.1, p = 0.005). The rate of change of the SRS PANQOL scores was significantly improved in the total (p = 0.005) and hearing (p = 0.04) domain score compared with observation. However, both groups regress to a similar PANQOL total and hearing domain score over time.

CONCLUSION

PANQOL scores were higher at baseline in the observation group than in the SRS group. However, over time, PANQOL scores in the observation group decreased while PANQOL scores in the SRS group increased, resulting in PANQOL scores that were equivalent by the end of follow-up.

The Patient-Centered Approach: A Review of the Literature and Its Application for Acoustic Neuromas

Patient-centered care is defined as "care that is consistent with and respects the values, needs, and wishes of patients" and is best achieved when clinicians involve patients and their support system in health care discussions and decisions. While this approach has been well established and supported in more general medical specialties, such as primary care, that may encompass a more holistic approach, it has rarely been described in surgical disciplines. Acoustic neuromas (ANs) can be unique among other skull base and intracranial pathologies, in that the management of these tumors can vary from patient to patient depending on various factors. Moreover, typical options, including observation, radiation, and surgery, may often have equipoise for some patients and their tumors. Therefore, a patient-centered approach, strongly guided by the expertise of experienced skull base surgeons, may likely be the most appropriate type of care for patients with ANs. Herein, we review the documented use of patient-centered care in other aspects of medicine, propose the benefits of this approach for patients with ANs, and provide ways this can be better implemented in practice.

Quality of life, social function, emotion, and facial paresis in Dutch vestibular schwannoma patients

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to replicate the finding that vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients with facial paresis experience lower health related quality of life (QoL) than those without facial paresis in a Dutch sample, and to extend these findings by measuring VS patients' overall satisfaction with life, social function, and emotion.

METHODS

Forty-seven VS patients, differing in degree of facial functioning, half of them with and half of them without a facial paresis, answered questionnaires about health related QoL (SF-36 and PANQOL), overall satisfaction with life, fear of being evaluated negatively by others, social avoidance and distress, and characteristics and symptoms of depression.

RESULTS

We observed that VS patients with facial paresis experience lower health-related QoL as well negatively impacted social function and emotion compared to VS patients without facial paresis. VS patients with facial paresis experienced lower overall satisfaction with life, more characteristic symptoms of depression, and more fear of being evaluated negatively by others than VS patients without facial paresis.

CONCLUSION

These findings corroborate previous research showing an association between impaired facial functioning and lower QoL, but also extend them by showing differences on the quality of social function and emotion. Being aware of this difference between VS patients with and without facial paresis informs health practitioners regarding the specific support these patients might need. Moreover, it is also relevant to consider the influence of a facial paresis on patients' life when deciding between treatment options and in case of surgery the type of resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.