Impact of perioperative pain management protocol on opioid prescribing patterns

Opioid Prescribing Patterns Following Lateral Skull Base Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the opioid prescribing patterns for and requirements of patients undergoing repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (sCSF) leaks of the lateral skull base.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adults with lateral skull base sCSF leaks who underwent repairs between September 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mean morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of opioids dispensed to inpatients and prescribed at discharge, additional pain control medications dispensed, and outpatient additional opioid requests were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of 78 patients included, 46 (59%) underwent repair via a transmastoid (TM), 6 (7.7%) via a middle cranial fossa (MCF), and 26 (33.3%) via a combined TM-MCF approach. Inpatients received a mean of 21.3, 31.4, and 37.6 MMEs per day during admission for the TM, MCF, and combined TM-MCF approaches, respectively ( p = 0.019, ηp 2 = 0.101). Upon discharge, nearly all patients (n = 74, 94.9%) received opioids; 27.3, 32.5, and 37.6 MMEs per day were prescribed after the TM, MCF, and TM-MCF approaches, respectively ( p = 0.015, ηp 2 = 0.093). Five (6.4%) patients requested additional outpatient pain medication, after which three were prescribed 36.7 MMEs per day. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension required significantly more inpatient MMEs than those without (41.5 versus 25.2, p = 0.02, d = 0.689), as did patients with a history of headaches (39.6 versus 23.6, p = 0.042, d = 0.684).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing sCSF leak repair via the MCF or TM-MCF approaches are prescribed more opioids postoperatively than patients undergoing the TM approach. Patients with a history of headaches or idiopathic intracranial hypertension might require more opioids postoperatively.

Comprehensive pain management as a frontline treatment to address the opioid crisis

BACKGROUND

The opioid crisis continues to devastate individuals and communities in the United States and abroad. While there have been several measures to address the over-prescription of opioid analgesics, the number of overdose deaths related to prescription opioids has not changed appreciably in the last 10 years. Comprehensive (or multidisciplinary) pain recovery programs consist of providers from multiple backgrounds that treat pain on an individual level through a combination of approaches including physical therapy, emotional and spiritual support, cognitive behavioral therapy, and non-opioid pharmacotherapies. Because there is a dynamic interplay between a given chronic pain patient and multiple providers, comprehensive pain programs are not as "standardized" as other medical treatments because they are meant to meet the individual needs of each patient and their specific pain diagnoses Methods: Review of the literature.

RESULTS

There is evidence that comprehensive pain treatment can reduce pain severity and improve functioning; comprehensive pain treatment can be used to treat those with post-surgical pain, thus preventing the onset of non-medical opioid use and opioid use disorder, and in persons with chronic pain who are on long-term opioid therapy, as a method to reduce or eliminate opioid medication use. Comprehensive pain recovery programs were abundant for a period from the 1960s through the 1980s, but for a variety of reasons, they became financially unsustainable as the national reimbursement environment evolved.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of the protracted and deadly opioid crisis, revitalizing and expanding comprehensive pain treatment should be considered as a frontline approach to treat chronic pain.

Reducing opioid use in post-operative otolaryngology patients: A quality improvement project

PURPOSE

In opioid-naive patients, many low-risk surgical procedures are associated with an increased risk of chronic opioid use. The goal of this quality improvement project was to reduce the amount of opioid prescriptions after commonly performed surgeries in otolaryngology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-intervention opioid prescribing state was measured using anonymous provider and patient surveys, as well as pharmacy provider prescription data. Next, this information was used to develop an opioid prescription protocol that both standardized opioid prescribing practices and encouraged multimodal analgesia following routine surgery. Finally, post-intervention data were gathered and compared to pre-intervention data to assess changes in prescribing patterns.

RESULTS

By patient survey, the worst pain and average pain after surgery (scale of 1-10) were unchanged after the intervention (5.1 to 4.8, p = 0.52; 4.1 to 3.6, p = 0.35, respectively). Post-intervention, 41% of patients reported receiving no opiates, whereas pre-intervention 100% of patients surveyed received opiates. The amount of ibuprofen and acetaminophen prescribed post-intervention increased 113% and 71%, respectively. By survey, the average number of opioid doses decreased from 24.0 ± 7.0 to 18.4 ± 6.6 (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a standardized physician opioid prescription protocol did not affect patient pain perceptions, resulted in an increase in multimodal analgesia prescription, and increased provider awareness of opioid over prescription.

Opioid reduction in ambulatory thyroid and parathyroid surgery after implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

BACKGROUND

Opioid abuse is widespread in the United States and the risk for chronic use is increased in surgical patients, including patients with thyroid and parathyroid.

METHODS

Records for 171 patients prior to and 67 patients following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for ambulatory thyroid/parathyroid surgeries were reviewed. The ERAS included superficial cervical plexus block, multimodal premedication, and postoperative reliance on acetaminophen and ibuprofen with judicious prescribing of opioids.

RESULTS

Post-ERAS patients were prescribed a mean 72 morphine milligram equivalents (MME); pre-ERAS patients were prescribed a mean 163 MME (p < 0.001). 97.1% of pre-ERAS patients were prescribed opioids with 91.1% filled; 68.7% of post-ERAS study patients were prescribed opioids with 84.8% filled.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of ERAS and focus on prescribing practices decreased the MME prescribed and used for ambulatory thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Future steps include increased patient education and tracking pain scores and medication utilization out of hospital.

Opioid Prescribing in Patients Undergoing Neck Dissections With Short Hospitalizations

Objective

To evaluate postoperative opioid prescribing in patients undergoing neck dissections with short hospitalizations.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary academic hospital.

Methods

The study population included patients who underwent lateral neck dissections with or without an associated head and neck procedure and required hospitalization for ≤3 days from 2012 to 2019. Interventions to decrease opioid utilization, including preoperative counseling, multimodality pain management, and multidisciplinary collaboration, were implemented in September 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: preintervention (group 1) and postintervention (group 2). The mean quantity of opioids prescribed during hospitalization, at discharge, and in refills was calculated in morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

Results

A total of 407 patients were included in the analysis: 223 patients in group 1 and 184 patients in group 2 (42.3% female, 89.4% white; average age, 55.2 years [95% CI, 53.6-56.9]). The mean opioid quantity prescribed in unilateral neck dissection alone decreased from 353.9 MME (95% CI, 266.7-441.2) in group 1 to 113.3 MME (95% CI, 87.8-138.7) in group 2 ( P < .001; effect size, 1.0). Statistically significant decreases in mean opioid quantity prescribed were also observed in unilateral neck dissection in combination with thyroidectomy, parotidectomy, glossectomy, or tonsillectomy. The percentage of patients requiring opioid prescription refills was not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the quantity of opioids prescribed in patients undergoing neck dissections and associated head and neck procedures with short hospitalizations can be reduced to as low as 100 to 125 MME with preoperative counseling, multimodality pain management, and multidisciplinary collaboration.

Postoperative Analgesia Protocol: A Resident-Led Effort to Standardize Opioid Prescribing Patterns

OBJECTIVES

The combined impact of variable surgeon prescribing preferences and low resident prescribing comfort level can lead to significant disparity in opioid prescribing patterns for the same surgery in the same academic surgical practice. We report the results of a resident led initiative to standardize postoperative prescription practices within the Department of Otolaryngology at a single tertiary-care academic hospital in order to reduce overall opioid distribution.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Following approval by the Institutional Review Board, performed a retrospective review of 12 months before (July 2016-June 2017) and after (July 2017-June 2018) implementation of the Postoperative Analgesia Protocol, which included all adults undergoing tonsillectomy, septoplasty, thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, tympanoplasty, middle ear exploration, stapedectomy, and ossicular chain reconstruction.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty eight procedures met inclusion criteria. Following implementation, total morphine milligram equivalents decreased by 26% (P < .0001). The number of patients requiring opioid refills decreased by 49%, and morphine milligram equivalents received as refills decreased by 16% (P < .001). Thyroid and parathyroid surgery had the greatest reduction in morphine milligram equivalents prescribed (84%, P < .001), followed by septoplasty (30%, P = .001) and tonsillectomy (18%, P < .001). The number of patients receiving refills of opioid medications decreased for all procedures (tonsillectomy 54%; septoplasty 67%; thyroid/parathyroid surgery 80%, middle ear surgery 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

While every patient and surgery must be treated individually, this study demonstrates that a resident led standardization of pain control regimes can result in significant reductions in total quantity of opioids prescribed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 131:982-988, 2021.

Postoperative Opioid Use and Pain Management Following Otologic and Neurotologic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The topic of prescription opioid overuse remains a growing concern in the United States. Our objective is to provide insight into pain perception and opioid use based on a patient cohort undergoing common otologic and neurotologic surgeries.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study with patient questionnaire.

SETTING

Single academic medical center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adult patients undergoing otologic and neurotologic procedures by two fellowship trained neurotologists between June and November of 2018 were included in this study. During first postoperative follow-up, participants completed a questionnaire assessing perceived postoperative pain and its impact on quality of life, pain management techniques, and extent of prescription opioid use.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The median pain score was 3 out of 10 (Interquartile Range [IQR] = 2-6) with no significant gender differences (P = .92). Patients were prescribed a median of 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-15.0) tablets of opioid pain medication postoperatively, but only used a median of 4.0 (IQR = 1.0-11.5) tablets at the time of first follow-up. Measured quality of life areas included sleep, physical activity, work, and mood. Sleep was most commonly affected, with 69.4% of patients noting disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that practitioners may over-estimate the need for opioid pain medication following otologic and neurotologic surgery. It also demonstrates the need for ongoing patient education regarding opioid risks, alternatives, and measures to prevent diversion.