Resolution of alcoholic neuropathy following liver transplantation

Gastrointestinal Disorders and the Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article describes the neurologic sequelae of various nutritional micronutrient deficiencies, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and liver disease. Where relevant, appropriate treatments for these conditions are also discussed. The developing field of the microbiome and nervous system interaction is also outlined.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pathology in the gastrointestinal system can affect the nervous system when it causes micronutrient deficiency, when immune responses created by the gastrointestinal system affect the nervous system, when toxins caused by gastrointestinal organ failure harm the nervous system, and when treatments aimed at a gastrointestinal medical condition cause damage to the nervous system as a side effect.

SUMMARY

This article addresses familiar concepts and new developments in the treatment and understanding of diseases that affect the gut and nervous system simultaneously.

Neuropraxia: An Underappreciated Morbidity of Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injuries can be devastating complications of surgery, potentially resulting in severe functional disability and decreased quality of life. Long surgeries with considerable tissue manipulation, for example, liver transplantation, may present increased risk; however, neuropraxia in transplantation has not been well investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all adult patients undergoing liver transplantation at a large academic center between January 2013 and December 2015. Descriptive analyses, logistic regressions, and forward selection procedures were used to determine the odds of developing neuropraxia and associated factors.

RESULTS

Of the 283 liver recipients, the mean age was 55.8 y, 35.1% were female, 65.6% were Caucasian, 8.9% were African American, 16.7% were Hispanic, and mean model for end-stage liver disease sodium score at transplant was 24.2 ± 10.9. The underlying etiology was alcohol (26.2%), hepatitis C (34.8%), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (13.1%), and other (14.2%). The incidence of neuropraxia after liver transplantation was 8.3% (n = 25), with 60% (n = 16) upper extremities, 82% left sided, and 84% male. There was no difference in age, race, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or smoking in those with neuropraxia versus those without. In multivariate analysis, neuropraxia was significantly associated with male gender, lower model for end-stage liver disease score, and longer duration of surgery (P < 0.05). Symptoms lasted median 5 d, with a wide range up to 187 d. Neuropraxia-specific treatment (physical therapy or medications) was required in 32% (n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral nerve injuries are an unexplored complication of liver transplantation. Although transient, a high number (8.2%) of patients developed neuropraxia, negatively affecting their ability for recovery. Exploration of mechanisms for minimizing risk and intraoperative detection and prevention should be considered to mitigate this complication.

Central Nervous System Correlates of "Objective" Neuropathy in Alcohol Use Disorder

BACKGROUND

Among the neurological consequences of alcoholism is peripheral neuropathy. Relative to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or diabetes-related neuropathies, neuropathy associated with alcohol use disorders (AUD) is understudied. In both the diabetes and HIV literature, emerging evidence supports a central nervous system (CNS) component to peripheral neuropathy.

METHODS

In seeking a central substrate for AUD-related neuropathy, the current study was conducted in 154 individuals with AUD (43 women, age 21 to 74 years) and 99 healthy controls (41 women, age 21 to 77 years) and explored subjective symptoms (self-report) and objective signs (perception of vibration, deep tendon ankle reflex, position sense, 2-point discrimination) of neuropathy separately. In addition to regional brain volumes, risk factors for AUD-related neuropathy, including age, sex, total lifetime ethanol consumed, nutritional indices (i.e., thiamine, folate), and measures of liver integrity (i.e., γ-glutamyltransferase), were evaluated.

RESULTS

The AUD group described more subjective symptoms of neuropathy and was more frequently impaired on bilateral perception of vibration. From 5 correlates, the number of AUD-related seizures was most significantly associated with subjective symptoms of neuropathy. There were 15 correlates of impaired perception of vibration among the AUD participants: Of these, age and volume of frontal precentral cortex were the most robust predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports CNS involvement in objective signs of neuropathy in AUD.

The neurology of solid organ transplantation

Transplantation is the rescue treatment for end-stage organ failure with more than 110,000 solid organs transplantations performed worldwide annually. Recent advances in transplantation procedures and posttransplantation management have improved long-term survival and quality of life of transplant recipients, shifting the focus from acute perioperative critical care needs toward long-term chronic medical problems. Neurologic complications affect up to 30-60 % of solid organ transplant recipients. Common etiologies include opportunistic infections and toxicities of antirejection medications, and wide spectrum of toxic and metabolic disturbances. Most complications are common to all allograft types, but some are relatively specific for individual allograft types (e.g., central pontine myelinolysis in liver transplant recipients). Close collaboration between neurologists and other transplant team members is essential for effective management. Early recognition of complications and accurate diagnosis leading to timely treatment is essential to reduce the morbidity and improve the overall transplant outcome.

Neurologic complications after liver transplantation

Neurologic complications are relatively common after solid organ transplantation and affect 15%-30% of liver transplant recipients. Etiology is often related to immunosuppressant neurotoxicity and opportunistic infections. Most common complications include seizures and encephalopathy, and occurrence of central pontine myelinolysis is relatively specific for liver transplant recipients. Delayed allograft function may precipitate hepatic encephalopathy and neurotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors typically manifests with tremor, headaches and encephalopathy. Reduction of neurotoxic immunosuppressants or conversion to an alternative medication usually result in clinical improvement. Standard preventive and diagnostic protocols have helped to reduce the prevalence of opportunistic central nervous system (CNS) infections, but viral and fungal CNS infections still affect 1% of liver transplant recipients, and the morbidity and mortality in the affected patients remain fairly high. Critical illness myopathy may also affect up to 7% of liver transplant recipients. Liver insufficiency is also associated with various neurologic disorders which may improve or resolve after successful liver transplantation. Accurate diagnosis and timely intervention are essential to improve outcomes, while advances in clinical management and extended post-transplant survival are increasingly shifting the focus to chronic post-transplant complications which are often encountered in a community hospital and an outpatient setting.

Selección de candidatos para trasplante hepático

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice in acute and irreversible chronic liver failure of distinct etiologies. Because of the current shortage of donor organs, careful selection of candidates for transplantation is required. In addition to specific prognostic models, there are general models, such as the Child-Pugh classification and the MELD system, which are useful in determining the optimal timing of liver transplantation in most patients with cirrhosis. Once the need for transplantation has been determined and the possibility of other available therapeutic measures has been ruled out, a multidisciplinary evaluation should be performed to assess the patient's suitability for this procedure. This evaluation must rule out the presence of medical, surgical or psychological factors that could compromise patient or graft survival, making transplantation futile. The present review analyzes the most frequent contraindications to transplantation, as well as the most important aspects of pretransplantation evaluation.