1
|
Matoba D, Noda T, Kobayashi S, Sasaki K, Iwagami Y, Yamada D, Tomimaru Y, Takahashi H, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Analysis of Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Patients with a High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score. Transplant Proc 2023:S0041-1345(23)00149-5. [PMID: 37120341 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system can predict short-term survival among patients awaiting liver transplantation and is used to allocate organs prioritizing liver transplantation. Patients with high MELD scores have been reported to have worse early graft dysfunction and survival. However, recent studies have shown that patients with high MELD scores had satisfactory graft survival, although they showed more postoperative complications. In this study, we examined the effect of the MELD score on the short-term and long-term prognosis of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS This study included 102 patients who underwent LDLT in our institution between 2005 and 2020. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to MELD score (low MELD group: ≤20, moderate MELD group: 21-30, and high MELD group: ≥31). Perioperative factors were compared among the 3 groups, and cumulative overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The patients' characteristics were comparable, and the median age was 54 years. Hepatitis C virus cirrhosis was the most common primary disease (n = 40), followed by hepatitis B virus (n = 11). The low MELD group consisted of 68 patients (median score: 16, 10-20); the moderate MELD group, 24 patients (median score: 24, 21-30); and the high MELD group, 10 patients (median score: 35, 31-40). The mean operative time (1241 min versus 1278 min versus 1158 min, P = .19) and mean blood loss (7517 mL vs 11162 mL vs 8808 mL, P = .71) were not significantly different among the 3 groups. The vascular and biliary complication rates were similar. The periods of intensive care unit and hospital stay tended to be longer in the high MELD group, but the difference was insignificant. The 1-year postoperative survival rate (85.3 % vs 87.5 % vs 90.0 %, P = .90) and overall survival rate were also not significantly different among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that LDLT patients with high MELD scores do not have a worse prognosis than those with low scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daijiro Matoba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Kazuki Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Iwagami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daisaku Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshito Tomimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Current management & future directions in post-liver transplant recurrence of viral hepatitis. JOURNAL OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.liver.2021.100027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
3
|
El-Hamamsy M, Montasser IF, Mansy AES, Nabet DE, El-Meteini M. Effect of cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus on the response to antiviral therapy after hepatitis C genotype-4 recurrence post-liver transplantation: A prospective cohort trial. J Clin Pharm Ther 2019; 44:447-453. [PMID: 30714175 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE The influence of immunosuppression on the response to antiviral therapy (AVT) for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients remains controversial, especially for the rarely investigated genotype 4. This study aims to compare the effects of the two widely used calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac)) on the therapeutic response to different AVT regimens. METHODS A prospective, dual-centre, cohort study of 126 Egyptian living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with recurrent HCV genotype 4 infection, who were categorized into three groups according to the AVT used. Group I received pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN-α 2a) plus ribavirin (RBV) (n = 44), group II received the direct antiviral agent (DAA) sofosbuvir plus RBV (n = 52) and group III received daclatasvir and sofosbuvir (also DAAs) plus RBV (n = 30). Each group was further subdivided according to the primary immunosuppression (CsA or Tac). The sustained virological response (SVR) and relapse rates were considered the primary therapeutic outcomes of AVT. RESULTS No significant intergroup differences were observed in the achievement of primary and secondary outcomes. SVR rates in the IFN-based regimen were 75% and 66.7% in CsA and Tac users and 81.2% and 83% in DAAs, respectively. Relapse rates in the IFN-based regimen were 10% and 16.7% in CsA and Tac users and 12.5% and 14.9% in DAAs, respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Within the limitations of a relatively small study, CsA did not offer an advantage over Tac regarding the response to AVT after HCV genotype 4 recurrence in LDLT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manal El-Hamamsy
- Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Iman Fawzy Montasser
- Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams Centre for Organ Transplantation (ASCOT), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Azza El-Sayed Mansy
- Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, El-Fayoum University, El-Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Dina Ezzeldin Nabet
- Pharmaceutical Sciences, Clinical pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams Centre for Organ Transplantation (ASCOT), Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud El-Meteini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams Centre for Organ Transplantation (ASCOT), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stradiot L, Mannaerts I, van Grunsven LA. P311, Friend, or Foe of Tissue Fibrosis? Front Pharmacol 2018; 9:1151. [PMID: 30369881 PMCID: PMC6194156 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
P311 was first identified by the group of Studler et al. (1993) in the developing brain. In healthy, but mainly in pathological tissues, P311 is implicated in cell migration and proliferation. Furthermore, evidence in models of tissue fibrosis points to the colocalization with and the stimulation of transforming growth factor β1 by P311. This review provides a comprehensive overview on P311 and discusses its potential as an anti-fibrotic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Stradiot
- Liver Cell Biology Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Inge Mannaerts
- Liver Cell Biology Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ezhilarasan D, Sokal E, Najimi M. Hepatic fibrosis: It is time to go with hepatic stellate cell-specific therapeutic targets. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2018; 17:192-197. [PMID: 29709350 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Hepatic fibrosis is a pathological lesion, characterized by the progressive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the perisinusoidal space and it is a major problem in chronic liver diseases. Phenotypic activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC) plays a central role in the progression of hepatic fibrosis. Retardation of proliferation and clearance of activated HSCs from the injured liver is an appropriate therapeutic strategy for the resolution and treatment of hepatic fibrosis. Clearance of activated HSCs from the injured liver by autophagy inhibitors, proapoptotic agents and senescence inducers with the high affinity toward the activated HSCs may be the novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of hepatic fibrosis in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devaraj Ezhilarasan
- Biomedical Research Unit and Laboratory Animal Centre, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - Etienne Sokal
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Laboratory of Pediatric Hepatology and Cell Therapy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium
| | - Mustapha Najimi
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Laboratory of Pediatric Hepatology and Cell Therapy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Management of post liver transplantation recurrent hepatitis C infection with directly acting antiviral drugs: a review. Hepatol Int 2016; 10:749-61. [PMID: 27337961 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-016-9744-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Recurrent HCV infection (rHCV) of the liver allograft following transplantation is universal and is associated with poor graft and patient survival in comparison with other indications. Treatment of rHCV infection in the previous era with pegylated interferon and ribavirin was associated with low sustained virological response (SVR) due to poor tolerability, adverse events and graft rejection. Recently, directly acting antiviral drugs (DAA) have been approved for the treatment of hepatitis C infection and a number of clinical trials have been conducted across various centers in the management of rHCV infection of the graft. In this review we discuss about recent studies that have emerged on the use of NS5b polymerase inhibitor, sofosbuvir in combination with second generation protease inhibitor, simeprevir, fixed dose ledipasvir or daclatasvir with or without ribavirin in the treatment of post transplant rHCV infection.
Collapse
|
7
|
Schon HT, Bartneck M, Borkham-Kamphorst E, Nattermann J, Lammers T, Tacke F, Weiskirchen R. Pharmacological Intervention in Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Hepatic Fibrosis. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7:33. [PMID: 26941644 PMCID: PMC4764688 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The activation and transdifferentiation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) into contractile, matrix-producing myofibroblasts (MFBs) are central events in hepatic fibrogenesis. These processes are driven by autocrine- and paracrine-acting soluble factors (i.e., cytokines and chemokines). Proof-of-concept studies of the last decades have shown that both the deactivation and removal of hepatic MFBs as well as antagonizing profibrogenic factors are in principle suitable to attenuate ongoing hepatic fibrosis. Although several drugs show potent antifibrotic activities in experimental models of hepatic fibrosis, there is presently no effective pharmaceutical intervention specifically approved for the treatment of liver fibrosis. Pharmaceutical interventions are generally hampered by insufficient supply of drugs to the diseased liver tissue and/or by adverse effects as a result of affecting non-target cells. Therefore, targeted delivery systems that bind specifically to receptors solely expressed on activated HSCs or transdifferentiated MFBs and delivery systems that can improve drug distribution to the liver in general are urgently needed. In this review, we summarize current strategies for targeted delivery of drugs to the liver and in particular to pro-fibrogenic liver cells. The applicability and efficacy of sequestering molecules, selective protein carriers, lipid-based drug vehicles, viral vectors, transcriptional targeting approaches, therapeutic liver- and HSC-specific nanoparticles, and miRNA-based strategies are discussed. Some of these delivery systems that had already been successfully tested in experimental animal models of ongoing hepatic fibrogenesis are expected to translate into clinically useful therapeutics specifically targeting HSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Theo Schon
- Institute of Molecular Pathobiochemistry, Experimental Gene Therapy and Clinical Chemistry, RWTH University Hospital Aachen Aachen, Germany
| | - Matthias Bartneck
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen, Germany
| | - Erawan Borkham-Kamphorst
- Institute of Molecular Pathobiochemistry, Experimental Gene Therapy and Clinical Chemistry, RWTH University Hospital Aachen Aachen, Germany
| | - Jacob Nattermann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn Bonn, Germany
| | - Twan Lammers
- Department for Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University Aachen, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen, Germany
| | - Ralf Weiskirchen
- Institute of Molecular Pathobiochemistry, Experimental Gene Therapy and Clinical Chemistry, RWTH University Hospital Aachen Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Habib S, Meister E, Habib S, Murakami T, Walker C, Rana A, Shaikh OS. Slower Fibrosis Progression Among Liver Transplant Recipients With Sustained Virological Response After Hepatitis C Treatment. Gastroenterology Res 2015; 8:237-246. [PMID: 27785303 PMCID: PMC5051041 DOI: 10.14740/gr686w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The natural course of hepatic fibrosis in HCV allograft recipients with sustained virological response (SVR) after anti-HCV therapy remains debatable. The aim of this study was to examine the progression of fibrosis in a cohort of patients who achieved SVR compared with those without treatment. Methods The 167 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were chosen from a transplant database. All patients were required to have histological evidence of recurrent HCV infection post-liver transplantation and a follow-up biopsy. The 140 of these patients had received anti-viral therapy. Twenty-seven patients were identified as controls and were matched with the treatment group in all respects. The patients were categorized into four groups based on treatment response: 1) no treatment (control) (n = 27); 2) non-responders (n = 81); 3) relapsers (n = 32); and 4) SVR (n = 27). The endpoint was the stage of fibrosis on the follow-up liver biopsy. Results The treated and untreated groups were similar in clinical characteristics at the time of transplantation and prior to the initiation of treatment. The 72% of the cohort showed a fibrosis progression of ≥ 1 stage; this change did not significantly differ between the patient groups. Nonetheless, the fibrosis progression rate was the highest in the untreated group and lowest in the patients who achieved SVR. A coefficient of determination was used. Improvements in fibrosis scores were found with greater treatment duration. These improvements were most evident with the achievement of SVR. Conclusions In conclusion, SVR after anti-viral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C infection post-transplantation was associated with slower fibrosis progression and significantly improved graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahid Habib
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | | | - Sana Habib
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | - Traci Murakami
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | - Courtney Walker
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | - Abbas Rana
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, TX, USA
| | - Obaid S Shaikh
- Division of Transplantation Surgery and Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Righi E, Londero A, Carnelutti A, Baccarani U, Bassetti M. Impact of new treatment options for hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:10760-75. [PMID: 26478668 PMCID: PMC4600578 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Revised: 07/12/2015] [Accepted: 09/15/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplant candidates and recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease greatly benefit from an effective antiviral therapy. The achievement of a sustained virological response before transplantation can prevent the recurrence of post-transplant HCV disease that occurs universally and correlates with enhanced progression to graft cirrhosis. Previous standard-of-care regimens (e.g., pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin with or without first generation protease inhibitors, boceprevir and telaprevir) displayed suboptimal results and poor tolerance in liver transplant recipients. A new class of potent direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) characterized by all-oral regimens with minimal side effects has been approved and included in the recent guidelines for the treatment of liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV disease. Association of sofosbuvir with ribavirin and/or ledipasvir is recommended in liver transplant recipients and patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Other regimens include simeprevir, daclatasvir, and combination of other DAA. Possible interactions should be monitored, especially in coinfected human immunodeficiency virus/HCV patients receiving antiretrovirals.
Collapse
|
10
|
Burra P, De Martin E, Zanetto A, Senzolo M, Russo FP, Zanus G, Fagiuoli S. Hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation: where do we stand? Transpl Int 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.12642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Gastroenterology; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology; Padua University Hospital; Padua Italy
| | - Eleonora De Martin
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Gastroenterology; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology; Padua University Hospital; Padua Italy
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire Paul Brousse; Villejuif France
| | - Alberto Zanetto
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Gastroenterology; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology; Padua University Hospital; Padua Italy
| | - Marco Senzolo
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Gastroenterology; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology; Padua University Hospital; Padua Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Russo
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Gastroenterology; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology; Padua University Hospital; Padua Italy
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology; Padua University Hospital; Padua Italy
| | - Stefano Fagiuoli
- Gastroenterology and Transplant Hepatology; Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital; Bergamo Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Verna EC, Saxena V, Burton JR, O'Leary JG, Dodge JL, Stravitz RT, Levitsky J, Trotter JF, Everson GT, Brown RS, Terrault NA. Telaprevir- and Boceprevir-based Triple Therapy for Hepatitis C in Liver Transplant Recipients With Advanced Recurrent Disease: A Multicenter Study. Transplantation 2015; 99:1644-51. [PMID: 25715116 PMCID: PMC4818984 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antiviral treatment with sustained virologic response (SVR) improves survival in liver transplant (LT) recipients, and is especially relevant to patients with advanced recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV). We assessed the safety and efficacy of protease inhibitor-based triple therapy in patients with recurrent advanced fibrosis and cholestatic hepatitis. METHODS The LT recipients with genotype 1 HCV and advanced fibrosis (F3-4/4) or cholestatic hepatitis treated with telaprevir- or boceprevir-based triple therapy at 6 centers (CRUSH-C consortium) were retrospectively assessed. The primary endpoints were SVR at 12 weeks (SVR12) and safety. RESULTS Forty-five patients with advanced fibrosis and 9 with cholestatic hepatitis (74% men, 57% genotype 1a, 63% previous nonresponders) were included. SVR12 occurred in 51% with advanced fibrosis and 44% with cholestatic hepatitis. Extended rapid virologic response was highly predictive of SVR12. Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio, 0.16; P = 0.03), previous null/partial response (0.24; P = 0.02), IL28B genotype CC (7.0; P = 0.02), albumin (3.87; P = 0.03), platelet count (1.01; P = 0.02), and steroid use (0.21; P = 0.03) were associated with SVR12. Six (11%) patients died, and hepatic decompensation occurred in 22% with advanced fibrosis and 33% with cholestatic hepatitis. Albumin (0.02; P = 0.001), encephalopathy (12.0; P = 0.04) and Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio, 6.17; P = 0.01) were associated with death or decompensation. CONCLUSIONS For LT recipients with recurrent advanced HCV and at greatest need of cure, protease inhibitor-based triple therapy achieved approximately 50% SVR12. However, there is significant risk of serious adverse events, arguing for earlier intervention. The availability of treatments with better efficacy and safety is of particular importance for posttransplant patients with advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Verna
- 1 Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York, NY. 2 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 3 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO. 4 Division of Hepatology and Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 5 Section of Hepatology and Hume-Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 6 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Optimizing outcome of recurrent hepatitis C virus genotype 4 after living donor liver transplantation: moving forward by looking back. Transplant Proc 2015; 46:822-7. [PMID: 24767357 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2013] [Revised: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 11/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recurrence of HCV after LDLT is almost universal. Different factors affect response to treatment. Few data are available regarding outcome of recurrent HCV genotype 4. The purpose of this study is to improve outcome of recurrent HCV genotype 4 after LDLT. METHODS An IRB approved chart review of 243 patients transplanted for ESLD, HCV genotype 4 over 4 years were reviewed. Protocol liver biopsies were taken 6 months after transplant. Patients received pegylated interferon and ribavirin in case of histological recurrence. Five patients had FCH were excluded. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients were included. Sustained Virological Response (SVR) was achieved in 29 (78.3%). Patients with Metavir fibrosis stage (F0) and (F1) had SVR in 5/5 (100%) and 20/24 (83.3%). Two patients with F1 had to stop treatment because of thrombocytopenia and 2 were non responders. Three out of 6 patients (50%) with (F2) had SVR, 2 were non responders and one had to discontinue treatment because of severe depression. One of 2 patients (50%) with F3 had SVR and the other patient decompensated within 4 months before treatment and died. CONCLUSION Protocol biopsies allow early detection of inflammatory changes in the graft before fibrosis occurs. Early treatment of recurrent HCV genotype 4 after LDLT results in better response.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dumortier J, Boillot O, Scoazec JY. Natural history, treatment and prevention of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: Past, present and future. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:11069-11079. [PMID: 25170196 PMCID: PMC4145750 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2014] [Accepted: 06/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is the main indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Post-transplant HCV re-infection is almost universal and results in accelerated progression from acute hepatitis to chronic hepatitis, and liver cirrhosis. Comprehension and treatment of recurrent HCV infection after LT have been major issues for all transplant hepatologists and transplant surgeons for the last decades. The aim of this paper is to review the evolution of our knowledge on the natural history of HCV recurrence after LT, including risk factors for disease progression, and antiviral therapy. We will focus our attention on possible ways (present and future) to improve the final long-term results of LT for HCV-related liver disease.
Collapse
|
14
|
Dumortier J, Salamé E, Roche B, Hurtova M, Conti F, Radenne S, Vanlemmens C, Pageaux GP, Saliba F, Samuel D, Compagnon P, Neau-Cransac M, Calmus Y, Guillaud O, Gugenheim J, Altieri M, Durand F, Hardwigsen J, Lorho R, Dharancy S, Leroy V, Di Giambattista F, Duvoux C. Severe fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: a French experience on 250 patients over 15 years (the Orfèvre study). Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2014; 38:292-9. [PMID: 24685602 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2013] [Revised: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with rapid fibrosis progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cumulative risk for severe fibrosis and the factors influencing it. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred and fifty LT patients were included 1 to 15years after LT. Recurrence of chronic hepatitis C on liver graft was classified according to Metavir score. RESULTS Kaplan-Meyer estimates for actuarial progression to severe fibrosis (Metavir>F3) showed a probability of 15.2% and 44.5% at 5 and 10years, respectively. Predictive factors for progression to severe fibrosis were: use of tacrolimus as main CNI, recipient age at time of biopsy<55, donor age ≥45, graft HCV re-infection<3months, biologically suspected graft re-infection and lack of response to antiviral treatment after LT. Multivariate analysis disclosed that only donor age ≥45 (hazard ratio 2.243, 95%CI 1.264-3.983, P=0.0058) and lack of response to antiviral treatment (hazard ratio 2.816, 95%CI 1.227-6.464, P=0.0146) were associated to severe fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that donor age ≥45 and lack of response to antiviral treatment after LT are major predictive factors of progression of HCV recurrence on liver graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Dumortier
- Unité de transplantation hépatique-fédération des spécialités digestives, HCL, pavillon D, hôpital Edouard-Herriot, 69437 Lyon cedex 03, France.
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Service de chirurgie digestive et transplantation hépatique, hôpital Trousseau, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France
| | - Bruno Roche
- Centre hépato-biliaire, hôpital Paul-Brousse, AP-HP, 94804 Villejuif, France
| | - Monika Hurtova
- Service d'hépatologie, hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Filomena Conti
- Service de chirurgie, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Radenne
- Service d'hépatologie, HCL, hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 69205 Lyon, France
| | - Claire Vanlemmens
- Service d'hépatologie, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, CHU de Besançon, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - Georges-Philippe Pageaux
- Fédération médico-chirurgicale des maladies de l'appareil digestif, hôpital Saint-Eloi, 34295 Montpellier, France
| | - Faouzi Saliba
- Centre hépato-biliaire, hôpital Paul-Brousse, AP-HP, 94804 Villejuif, France
| | - Didier Samuel
- Centre hépato-biliaire, hôpital Paul-Brousse, AP-HP, 94804 Villejuif, France
| | - Philippe Compagnon
- Service de chirurgie digestive et hépato-biliaire - transplantation hépatique, hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France
| | | | - Yvon Calmus
- Service de chirurgie, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Olivier Guillaud
- Unité de transplantation hépatique-fédération des spécialités digestives, HCL, pavillon D, hôpital Edouard-Herriot, 69437 Lyon cedex 03, France
| | - Jean Gugenheim
- Service de chirurgie digestive, hôpital L'Archet 2, CHU de Nice, 06202 Nice, France
| | - Mario Altieri
- Service de chirurgie digestive, CHU de Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen, France
| | - François Durand
- Service d'hépatologie, hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, 92118 Clichy, France
| | - Jean Hardwigsen
- Service de chirurgie digestive, hôpital la Conception, 13385 Marseille, France
| | - Richard Lorho
- Service de chirurgie hépato-biliaire et digestive, hôpital de Pontchaillou, 35033 Rennes, France
| | | | - Vincent Leroy
- Service d'hépato-gastro-entérologie, hôpital A.-Michallon, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | | | - Christophe Duvoux
- Service d'hépatologie, hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, 94000 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dhanasekaran R, Firpi RJ. Challenges of recurrent hepatitis C in the liver transplant patient. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:3391-3400. [PMID: 24707122 PMCID: PMC3974506 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2013] [Revised: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 03/10/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a very common indication for liver transplant. Unfortunately recurrence of HCV is almost universal in patients who are viremic at the time of transplant. The progression of fibrosis has been shown to be more rapid in the post-transplant patients than in the transplant naïve, hence treatment of recurrent HCV needs to be considered for all patients with documented recurrent HCV. Management of recurrent HCV is a challenging situation both for patients and physicians due to multiple reasons as discussed in this review. The standard HCV treatment with pegylated interferon and Ribavarin can be considered in these patients but it leads to a lower rate of sustained virologic clearance than in the non-transplanted population. Some of the main challenges associated with treating recurrent HCV in post-transplant patients include the presence of cytopenias; need to monitor drug-drug interactions and the increased incidence of renal compromise. In spite of these obstacles all patients with recurrent HCV should be considered for treatment since it is associated with improvement in survival and a delay in fibrosis progression. With the arrival of direct acting antiviral drugs there is renewed hope for better outcomes in the treatment of post-transplant HCV recurrence. This review evaluates current literature on this topic and identifies challenges associated with the management of post-transplant HCV recurrence.
Collapse
|
16
|
Walzer N, Flamm SL. Pegylated IFN-α and ribavirin: emerging data in the treatment of special populations. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2014; 2:67-76. [PMID: 24422772 DOI: 10.1586/17512433.2.1.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease and is currently the leading indication for liver transplantation in the USA. Pegylated IFN-α (PEG-IFN-α) and ribavirin comprise the standard of care for the treatment of chronic HCV. The expansion of antiviral therapy to include special populations that were not well represented or excluded from registration trials has occurred in recent years. Data have emerged that demonstrate that these groups have variable responses to therapy and, in some cases, different side-effect profiles. The etiologies for the varied response rates remain under investigation. This review will address the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of PEG-IFN-α and ribavirin in populations of patients coinfected with HIV, obese patients, liver transplant recipients, children and African-Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Walzer
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 N St Clair Galter 15-250, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Agarwal K, Barnabas A. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45 Suppl 5:S349-54. [PMID: 24091115 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2013] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is a leading cause of end stage liver disease and one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Furthermore, hepatitis C virus recurrence is universal post-transplant leading to decreased graft and patient survival. Recurrent disease related to hepatitis C virus can lead to between 20 and 30% of patients developing recurrent cirrhosis within 5 years. Treatment options with antiviral therapy are limited and are associated with a significant side-effect profile, suboptimal tolerability and inferior response rates. Attention has therefore turned to strategies that can reduce hepatitis C virus recurrence rates post-transplant. Approximately only 30% of patients will achieve a sustained virologic response with current therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Successful hepatitis C virus eradication is the only factor associated with improved graft and patient survival post liver transplantation. Here we provide an overview of antiviral treatment in patients in the transplant arena and the potential opportunities and challenges with the introduction of new directly acting antivirals in G1 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosh Agarwal
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
García-Reyne A, Lumbreras C, Fernández I, Colina F, Abradelo M, Magan P, San-Juan R, Manrique A, López-Medrano F, Fuertes A, Lizasoain M, Moreno E, Aguado JM. Influence of antiviral therapy in the long-term outcome of recurrent hepatitis C virus infection following liver transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2013; 15:405-15. [PMID: 23725370 DOI: 10.1111/tid.12097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2012] [Revised: 12/03/2012] [Accepted: 12/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant recipients (LTR) is variable and the influence of different factors, including the administration of antiviral therapy in the long-term outcome is controversial. METHODS We analyzed the outcome of a cohort of HCV-infected LTR who were transplanted in our institution. Patients were divided into 2 groups (severe and non-severe HCV disease) depending on the presence of a fibrosis score of F ≥ 2 in the Scheuer index and/or fibrosing cholestasic hepatitis (FCH) in a graft biopsy. Risk factors were studied using logistic regression analysis. Survival of patients was estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots. A total of 146 patients were followed for a mean of 58 months. RESULTS Fifty-six (34%) patients developed severe HCV disease and showed shorter survival (P < 0.024). Donor age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.06) and pre-transplant viral load (VL) >10(6) UI/mL (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.42-10.61) were the only factors associated with severe HCV infection. Over-immunosuppression (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2-4.41) was specifically associated with the development of FCH. Overall, patient survival in recipients who received a full course of anti-HCV therapy was higher than in patients who did not complete antiviral therapy (P = 0.004) or received no treatment (P = 0.007). Patients with non-severe HCV infection have a higher probability of receiving a full course of antiviral therapy (P = 0.033). CONCLUSION In conclusion, donor age, pre-transplant VL, and over-immunosuppression were associated with the long-term development of severe HCV recurrence in liver grafts. Administration of a full course of antiviral therapy was associated with better survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A García-Reyne
- Infectious Diseases Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Berenguer M, Schuppan D. Progression of liver fibrosis in post-transplant hepatitis C: mechanisms, assessment and treatment. J Hepatol 2013; 58:1028-41. [PMID: 23262248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Revised: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 12/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Liver fibrosis results from an excessive wound healing response in most chronic liver diseases, such as hepatitis C. Despite great advances in antiviral therapy in recent years, progressive liver fibrosis remains a major problem for patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Liver biopsy remains a central tool in the management of HCV-positive liver transplant recipients, but reliable non-invasive methods for the assessment of liver fibrosis, such as ultrasound elastography, are increasingly being incorporated in the management of post-transplant patients, helping predict prognosis, guide treatment decisions, and stratify patients for emerging antifibrotic therapies. In this manuscript, we will review the natural history as well as tools to monitor fibrosis progression in the HCV-positive liver transplant recipient, the mechanisms underlying rapid fibrosis progression in up to 30% of these patients, the effect of antiviral therapies and highlight promising antifibrotic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Berenguer
- University Valencia, Dept. of Medicine, Hepatology & Liver Transplantation Unit, La Fe Hospital and CIBEREHD, National Network Center for Hepatology and Gastroenterology Research, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Joshi D, Carey I, Agarwal K. Review article: the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplant candidates and recipients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37:659-71. [PMID: 23432320 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2012] [Revised: 12/20/2012] [Accepted: 02/03/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the therapeutic landscape with regard to anti-HCV therapy has changed dramatically. The new directly acting anti-virals (DAAs) have demonstrated improved sustained virological response (SVR) compared with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin. AIM To examine and present the latest data with regard to anti-viral therapy in genotype 1 HCV-positive transplant candidates and recipients. METHODS An electronic search using Medline was performed. Search terms included 'HCV, DAA and protease inhibitor' in combination with 'treatment pre-transplantation' and 'treatment post-transplantation'. RESULTS Patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis have inferior SVR rates compared with patients with minimal fibrosis. A low accelerating dose regimen (LADR) of pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PR) appears to be a safe therapeutic option. Side effects also appear to be more pronounced in patients with advanced disease. Data from the large registration studies with triple therapy (boceprevir or telaprevir plus PR) demonstrated improved SVR rates even in patients with advanced disease, although virological relapse rates were highest amongst these patients. In transplant recipients, initial data are being reported on the use of triple therapy, and although no SVR data are available, promising results are accruing. The drug-drug interactions appear to be manageable. Side effects in particular anaemia appear to be markedly increased in the posttransplant setting. CONCLUSIONS The use of the new DAAs in patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis pretransplant and posttransplant appears possible, with manageable side effects and drug-drug interactions, and improved early virological response rates. We recommend that these patients are managed in centres with the appropriate expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Joshi
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee SW, Bae SH. Management of Hepatitis C Viral Infection Pre- and Post-liver Transplantation. KOREAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2013. [DOI: 10.4285/jkstn.2013.27.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Won Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Hyun Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Duvoux C, Firpi R, Grazi GL, Levy G, Renner E, Villamil F. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection post liver transplantation: impact of choice of calcineurin inhibitor. Transpl Int 2013; 26:358-72. [PMID: 23413991 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2012] [Revised: 03/23/2012] [Accepted: 12/23/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection following liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C is universal. After LT, hepatitis C is associated with accelerated fibrosis progression and reduced graft and patient survival. Furthermore, responses to antiviral therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus post-transplant are consistently sub-optimal. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) like cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus continue to dominate immunosuppressive regimens in this population; however, there is still uncertainty as to whether either offers an advantage in terms of patient outcomes. Although tacrolimus demonstrates improved efficacy in the general LT population, differences have begun to emerge between these agents regarding diabetogenic potential, antiviral activity, and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C. This review critically evaluates the existing literature, providing an overview of the reported differences, concluding that despite conflicting evidence, a potential benefit of CsA in patients with hepatitis C is supported by the data and warrants further investigation. Future studies examining the role of CNIs in hepatitis C virus-positive LT recipients are required to accurately examine the effects of CNIs on outcomes such as fibrosis progression, survival, and effects on response to antiviral therapy, to provide robust information that allows clinicians to make an informed choice concerning which CNI is best for their patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
Living-donor liver transplantation and hepatitis C. HPB SURGERY : A WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATIC, PANCREATIC AND BILIARY SURGERY 2013; 2013:985972. [PMID: 23401640 PMCID: PMC3564275 DOI: 10.1155/2013/985972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2012] [Accepted: 01/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompression. In areas with low deceased-donor organ availability like Japan, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is similarly indicated for HCV cirrhosis as deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Western countries and accepted as an established treatment for HCV-cirrhosis, and the results are equivalent to those of DDLT. To prevent graft failure due to recurrent hepatitis C, antiviral treatment with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. In contrast to DDLT, many Japanese LDLT centers have reported modified treatment regimens as best efforts to secure first graft, such as aggressive preemptive antiviral treatment, escalation of dosages, and elongation of treatment duration.
Collapse
|
24
|
Rabie R, Mumtaz K, Renner EL. Efficacy of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C after liver transplantation with cyclosporine and tacrolimus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Transpl 2013; 19:36-48. [PMID: 22821730 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2012] [Accepted: 07/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Cyclosporine A (CSA), but not tacrolimus (TAC), inhibits hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication in vitro. Clinical reports on the efficacy of interferon-α (IFNα)-based antiviral therapy (AVT) for recurrent HCV after liver transplantation (LT) with CSA and TAC are conflicting. Our aim was to assess whether AVT for recurrent HCV after LT is more effective with CSA or TAC. We performed an electronic database search (1995-2012) and a manual abstract search (2005-2012). The a priori defined eligibility criteria included the use of AVT for recurrent HCV with IFN (standard or pegylated) and ribavirin and the reporting of sustained virological response (SVR) rates with CSA and TAC (the primary outcome). Two authors identified and extracted data independently. Dichotomous data were expressed as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a random effects model. In all, 5058 references were retrieved, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 17 observational studies (13 full-text articles) met the eligibility criteria; the meta-analysis was based on the latter studies. The pooled SVR rates were 42% (395/945) with CSA and 35% (471/1364) with TAC (RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.00-1.39, P = 0.05). Although the pooled data contained significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 45%, P = 0.02), the SVR rates in the RCT were comparable (39% with CSA and 35% with TAC). Limiting the analysis to the 7 studies reporting on 40 or more patients in each group (with 1634 patients in all) favored CSA (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.09-1.38, P < 0.001), and heterogeneity disappeared (I(2) = 0%, P = 0.62). In conclusion, IFN-based AVT for recurrent HCV after LT seems marginally more effective with CSA versus TAC; the study heterogeneity, however, limits firm conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rania Rabie
- Liver Transplant Program/Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network/Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Urgent splenectomy after partial splenic embolization in liver-transplanted patient: a case report. Case Rep Transplant 2012; 2012:959635. [PMID: 23259147 PMCID: PMC3504206 DOI: 10.1155/2012/959635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2012] [Accepted: 10/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe a 51-year-old-male. Three months after liver transplantation due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatopathy, an HCV relapse was detected, and partial splenic embolization (PSE) was performed prior to antiviral treatment. Eleven days after PSE emergency splenectomy was performed due to the development of a splenic abscess, which is a rare but severe complication of PSE. Between May 2002 and March 2012, 18 PSEs have been performed in transplant patients in our centre. The patient presented here is the only case of splenic abscess and the only one who has needed surgery after complications of PSE.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ponziani FR, Milani A, Gasbarrini A, Zaccaria R, Viganò R, Iemmolo RM, Donato MF, Rendina M, Toniutto P, Pasulo L, Cescon M, Burra P, Miglioresi L, Merli M, Paolo DD, Fagiuoli S, Pompili M. Treatment of genotype-1 hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplant improves survival in both sustained responders and relapsers. Transpl Int 2012; 26:281-9. [PMID: 23230956 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2012] [Revised: 07/17/2012] [Accepted: 11/01/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting the response to treatment and how it could affect survival in a large series of genotype-1 HCV-transplanted patients. Three-hundred and twenty six genotype-1 HCV patients were enrolled. One hundred and ninety-six patients (60.1%) were nonresponders and 130 (39.9%) showed negative HCV-RNA at the end of treatment. Eighty-four of them (25.8%) achieved sustained virological response, while 46 (14.1%) showed viral relapse. Five-year cumulative survival was significantly worse in nonresponders (76.4%) compared with sustained viral response (93.2) or relapsers (94.9%). Sustained responders and relapsers were therefore considered as a single 'response group' in further analysis. Pretreatment variables significantly associated with virological response at multivariate regression analysis were the absence of ineffective pretransplant antiviral therapy, the recurrence of HCV-hepatitis more than 1 year after transplant, an histological grading ≥4 at pretreatment liver biopsy, a pretreatment HCV-RNA level <1.2 × 10(6 ) IU/ml, and the absence of diabetes. As expected, also on-treatment variables (rapid and early virological response) were significantly associated to the response to antiviral treatment. In conclusion, this study shows that postliver transplant antiviral treatment results in beneficial effect on survival not only in sustained responders but also in relapsers.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
GOALS To evaluate the safety and efficacy of peginterferon-α-2b plus ribavirin in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplant. BACKGROUND Reinfection of liver allografts in hepatitis C virus -infected transplant recipients begins immediately after transplantation. Treatment of these patients is challenging because of poor tolerability. STUDY A multicenter, open-label study enrolling patients with persistent viremia after primary orthotopic liver transplant for cirrhosis related to hepatitis C virus infection. Patients received peginterferon-α-2b (1.5 µg/kg/wk) plus ribavirin (400 to 1200 mg/d administered using a dose-escalating regimen and according to body weight) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR). RESULTS In total, 125 patients started treatment and 58.4% completed 48 weeks. SVR rate was 28.8% (G1, 23.8%; G2/3, 55.0%), end-of-treatment response rate was 40.8%, and relapse rate was 18.2%. SVR was 55% among patients who completed treatment. Genotype 2/3 infection, male sex, baseline hemoglobin>14 g/dL, 80:80:80 compliance, rapid virologic response (RVR), and complete early virologic response (cEVR) were predictors of SVR. SVR was higher among patients with RVR compared with those without RVR (83.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.0098), and among patients with cEVR compared with those without EVR (66.7% vs. 1.8%; P<0.0001). Thirty-eight patients discontinued because of an adverse event and 69 required dose reduction or interruption. Anemia (74%) and neutropenia (30%) were common, and rejection was low (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS SVR was low in this study. Anemia was a particular challenge in achieving maximal ribavirin therapeutic exposure and may account in part for the lower SVR.
Collapse
|
28
|
Carbone M, Lenci I, Baiocchi L. Prevention of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: An update. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2012; 3:36-48. [PMID: 22966482 PMCID: PMC3437445 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v3.i4.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2011] [Revised: 06/20/2012] [Accepted: 06/28/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis C related liver failure and hepatocarcinoma are the most common indications for liver transplantation in Western countries. Recurrent hepatitis C infection of the allograft is universal and immediate following liver transplantation, being associated with accelerated progression to cirrhosis, graft loss and death. Graft and patient survival is reduced in liver transplant recipients with recurrent Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection compared to HCV-negative recipients. Many variables may impact on recurrent HCV liver disease. Overall, excess immunosuppression is believed to be a key factor; however, no immunosuppressive regimen has been identified to be more beneficial or less harmful. Donor age limitations, exclusion of moderately to severely steatotic livers and minimization of ischemic times could be a potential strategy to minimize the severity of HCV disease in transplanted subjects. After transplantation, antiviral therapy based on pegylated IFN alpha with or without ribavirin is associated with far less results than that reported for immunocompetent HCV-infected patients. New findings in the field of immunotherapy and genomic medicine applied to this context are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Carbone
- Marco Carbone, Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
While preclinical development of potential anti-fibrotics is far advanced, with numerous pharmacological targets and promising agents, almost none has entered clinical validation. Reasons are manifold, including the usually slow progression of liver fibrosis, requiring high numbers of well-stratified patients undergoing long-term treatment when conventional liver biopsy based parameters or hard liver-related endpoints are used. Importantly, there is a notorious lack of sensitive and specific surrogate markers or imaging technologies for liver fibrosis progression or regression that would permit a rapid clinical screening for potential anti-fibrotics. Nonetheless, in view of an urgent need for anti-fibrotics that positively impact morbidity and mortality from chronic liver diseases, the field is now moving more quickly towards clinical translation. This development is driven by thoughtful preclinical validation, a better study design and improved surrogate readouts using currently available methodologies. Moreover, upcoming novel biomarkers and imaging technologies will soon permit a more exact and efficient assessment of fibrosis progression and regression.
Collapse
|
30
|
Berenguer M, Charco R, Manuel Pascasio J, Ignacio Herrero J. Spanish society of liver transplantation (SETH) consensus recommendations on hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation. Liver Int 2012; 32:712-31. [PMID: 22221843 DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02731.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2011] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In November 2010, the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, SETH) held a consensus conference. One of the topics of debate was liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C. This document reviews (i) the natural history of post-transplant hepatitis C, (ii) factors associated with post-transplant prognosis in patients with hepatitis C, (iii) the role of immunosuppression in the evolution of recurrent hepatitis C and response to antiviral therapy, (iv) antiviral therapy, both before and after transplantation, (v) follow-up of patients with recurrent hepatitis C and (vi) the role of retransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Berenguer
- Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, SETH)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Perrakis A, Yedibela S, Schuhmann S, Croner R, Schellerer V, Demir R, Hohenberger W, Müller V. The effect and safety of the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C infection after orthotopic liver transplantation with pegylated interferon α2b and ribavirin. Transplant Proc 2012; 43:3824-8. [PMID: 22172854 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2011] [Revised: 08/01/2011] [Accepted: 08/31/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recurrent hepatitis C infection in the posttransplant setting is a serious problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, indications, optimal time of administration and adequate duration of antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon alpha 2 b (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RIB). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2003 and 2009, 16 patients received antiviral therapy (PEG-IFN: 0.8-1.6 μg/kg/wk, RIB 800-1200 mg/d) for at least 6 months. Patients with a biochemical without a virologicalresponse after 12 months of therapy received antiviral treatment for a further 6 months. Hepatitis C virus load was determined at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after start of therapy. Liver biopsy was performed in all patients before the beginning and after the end of treatment. RESULTS The mean period of antiviral therapy was 14 months. The four patients who received the full-length treatment (12 months, 33%) showed sustained virological responses (SVR) and 8 showed virological and biochemical responses (VR, BR). Patients with SVR showed significant improvement in the grading and staging of HAI (histological activity index; P=.03). Nine patients had several side effects under antiviral treatment. Acute rejection episodes were not observed. CONCLUSION The antiviral treatment combination using PEG-IFN and RIB for recurrent hepatitis C is effective procedure. The SVR of 33% after 12 months of treatment with significant improvement in HAI grading and staging and stable HAI in all treated patients favor early initiation and 12-month administration of antiviral treatment. Furthermore, all patients with BR without VR, who underwent antiviral treatment for a further 6 months, achieved a VR. However, the optimal duration of treatment needs to be investigated in large prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Perrakis
- Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sikka S. Treatment of hepatitis C in liver transplant patient. APOLLO MEDICINE 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0976-0016(12)60121-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
|
33
|
Abstract
Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompensation. The use of poor quality organs, particularly from older donors, has a highly negative impact on the severity of recurrence and patient/graft survival. Although immunosuppressive regimens have a considerable impact on the outcome, the optimal regimen after liver transplantation for HCV-infected patients remains unclear. Disease progression monitoring with protocol biopsy and new noninvasive methods is essential for predicting patient/graft outcome and starting antiviral treatment with the appropriate timing. Antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. Living-donor liver transplantation is now widely accepted as an established treatment for HCV cirrhosis and the results are equivalent to those of deceased donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ueda Y, Marusawa H, Kaido T, Ogura Y, Oike F, Mori A, Ogawa K, Yoshizawa A, Hatano E, Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Haga H, Egawa H, Takada Y, Uemoto S, Chiba T. Effect of maintenance therapy with low-dose peginterferon for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation. J Viral Hepat 2012; 19:32-8. [PMID: 21129128 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01398.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 30% of patients who have recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation achieve sustained virological response (SVR) by taking a combination therapy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. For the remaining non-SVR patients, an effective management treatment has not yet been established. In this study, efficacy of long-term peginterferon maintenance therapy for non-SVR patients was evaluated. Forty patients who had previously received the combination therapy for hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation were classified into one of the following three groups: the SVR group (n = 11); the non-SVR-IFN group (n =17), which received low-dose peginterferon maintenance therapy for non-SVR patients; and the non-SVR-Withdrawal group (n = 12), which discontinued the interferon treatment. We then compared histological changes among these three groups after 2 or more years follow-up. Activity grade of liver histology improved or remained stable in patients in the SVR and non-SVR-IFN groups, but deteriorated in half of the patients in the non-SVR-Withdrawal group. Fibrosis improved or remained stable in 10 of 11 SVR patients and in 13 of 17 non-SVR-IFN patients, but deteriorated in all non-SVR-Withdrawal patients. Mean changes in fibrosis stage between pretreatment and final liver biopsy were -0.18, +0.06 and +2.2 in the SVR, non-SVR-IFN and non-SVR-Withdrawal groups, respectively. Fibrosis stage deteriorated to F3 or F4 significantly more rapidly in the non-SVR-Withdrawal group than in the other two groups. In conclusion, continuing long-term maintenance therapy with peginterferon prevented histological progression of hepatitis C in patients who had undergone living donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Ueda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Venturi C, Bueno J, Castells L, Quintero J, Casas I, Allende H, Martinez-Ibañez V, Charco R. Long-term outcome of hepatitis C virus infections acquired after pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2011; 17:1474-80. [PMID: 21932378 DOI: 10.1002/lt.22439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The outcomes and characterization of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections after pediatric liver transplantation (LT) have rarely been reported. We describe our experience with HCV infections after pediatric LT. Ten of 207 children (4.8%) who underwent LT at our institution (1985-2010) developed previously undiagnosed HCV disease. Eight received a liver graft before blood product and donor screening for HCV became available. The mean age at transplantation was 8.9 ± 4.3 years, and the median time from transplantation to the diagnosis of HCV was 15.1 years (range = 0.2-19.7 years). The genotypes were 1 (n = 8), 3 (n = 1), and undetermined (n = 1). At the time of this writing, all the patients were still alive with a mean follow-up of 7.3 ± 5.5 years after the diagnosis of HCV. Five patients did not receive treatment; 2 of these patients achieved spontaneous viral clearance (SVC). Four of the 5 treated patients achieved a sustained virological response, and 3 had an early virological response (EVR). Two of these 4 patients developed chronic rejection while they were on treatment, but this was resolved with a conversion from cyclosporine A to tacrolimus. The remaining patient was continuing treatment and had achieved EVR. In conclusion, despite the limitations of our series, de novo HCV infections after pediatric LT seem to have a slow histological progression. Even with genotype 1, the patients have a good long-term prognosis and respond well to treatment. Nevertheless, chronic rejection during antiviral therapy may develop. In addition, SVC may occur in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Venturi
- Pediatric Surgery and Transplant Unit, Saint Luc University Clinics, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Berenguer M. Hot topic in hepatitis C virus research: the type of immunosuppression does not matter. Liver Transpl 2011; 17 Suppl 3:S24-8. [PMID: 21634004 DOI: 10.1002/lt.22347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
1. The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly variable. Old donor age is a factor that has consistently been shown to affect disease progression. 2. Overall, immunosuppression determines the progression of HCV-related disease; however, the type of immunosuppressive agent used for induction or maintenance is not a key factor. 3. Steroid boluses should be avoided; they are associated with increased viremia, fibrosis progression, and reduced survival. 4. Antiviral therapy, particularly if it is successful, is associated with improved outcomes for liver transplant recipients with HCV. 5. There are no convincing data for modifying the type of immunosuppression before antiviral therapy is started.
Collapse
|
37
|
Limaye AR, Firpi RJ. Management of recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation. Clin Liver Dis 2011; 15:845-58. [PMID: 22032532 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2011.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Recurrence of hepatitis C virus remains a near-universal phenomenon after liver transplantation (LT) and is responsible for the high morbidity and low survival seen in these patients. The severity of recurrent disease varies depending on multiple factors, only some of which are modifiable. Antiviral therapy is associated with improved outcomes, but viral clearance is only attainable in a small percentage of this patient population. This patient population is in need of new therapeutic options, and it remains to be seen whether direct-acting antiviral agents will be the answer to this ongoing therapeutic question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alpna R Limaye
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
De Martin E, Rodriguez-Castro KI, Vitale A, Zanus G, Senzolo M, Russo FP, Burra P. Antiviral treatment for HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: when, how much and for how long? Future Virol 2011. [DOI: 10.2217/fvl.11.89] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Chronic HCV infection is one of the leading causes of end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide, and it constitutes one of the principal indications for liver transplant. However, recurrent HCV infection after liver transplant is nearly universal, and leads to decreased patient and graft survival in the long-term. Strategies to approach this problem that is commonly encountered in clinical practice include treating patients in order to obtain viral clearance before the transplant, pre-emptive treatment, which refers to therapy initiation before there is histological evidence of disease, and treatment for established recurrence. Therapy at these diverse time points poses varied challenges regarding the feasibility of the treatment, possibility of treatment completion, risk of adverse effects and different response rates. Furthermore, advances are being made in identifying prognostic markers of viral response, which could aid in decreasing the disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora De Martin
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical & Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University Hospital. Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Kryssia I Rodriguez-Castro
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical & Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University Hospital. Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vitale
- Department of General Surgery & Organ Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplant Unit, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- Department of General Surgery & Organ Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplant Unit, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Senzolo
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical & Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University Hospital. Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Russo
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical & Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University Hospital. Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical & Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University Hospital. Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cyclosporine a-based immunosuppression reduces relapse rate after antiviral therapy in transplanted patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a large multicenter cohort study. Transplantation 2011; 92:334-40. [PMID: 21659948 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e318223d836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of immunosuppression on the response to antiviral treatment in recurrent hepatitis C is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to identify those factors that might predict sustained viral response and relapse. METHODS The ReViS-TC, a multicenter cohort study conducted in 14 Spanish liver centers, included data from liver transplant recipients from January 2000 to December 2006 who had recurrent hepatitis C virus and who had undergone antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Sustained virological response (SVR) and viral relapse were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to investigate host, donor, and therapeutic factors associated with SVR and relapse. RESULTS The analysis included 410 patients, 30% treated with cyclosporine A (CsA) and 70% with tacrolimus. SVR was achieved in 48% of patients with CsA and in 37% with tacrolimus (P=0.037), with a relapse rate of 18% and 36%, respectively (P=0.008). In the multivariate model, the administration of CsA (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, P=0.021) in conjunction with a longer antiviral treatment duration (OR 0.86, P=0.024) correlated with lower relapse rate, whereas the older age of the donor (OR 1.03, P=0.006) and the presence of genotype 1 (OR 3.45, P=0.032) were associated with a higher probability of relapse. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the use of CsA-based immunosuppression regimens and longer treatment duration may protect patients against viral relapse after a positive response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy. These data need to be further confirmed in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
40
|
Holmes JA, Desmond PV, Thompson AJ. Redefining baseline demographics: the role of genetic testing in hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Liver Dis 2011; 15:497-513. [PMID: 21867933 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2011.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The current standard of care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Unfortunately, treatment cures at best only 40% to 50% of patients infected with genotype 1 HCV, the most common HCV genotype in Western countries. Treatment is also expensive and is often poorly tolerated. Therefore, the identification of patients most likely to benefit from treatment is clinically important. Genome-wide association studies have recently identified genetic variants, most notably IL28B and ITPA, which will enhance the ability of clinicians to personalize antiviral therapy for HCV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacinta A Holmes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy 3065, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hashemi N, Araya V, Tufail K, Thummalakunta L, Feyssa E, Azhar A, Niazi M, Ortiz J. An extended treatment protocol with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2011; 3:198-204. [PMID: 21866251 PMCID: PMC3158908 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v3.i7.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2010] [Revised: 06/02/2011] [Accepted: 06/09/2011] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an extended treatment protocol and to determine the predictors of sustained virological response (SVR) after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS Between August 2005 and November 2008, patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after LT were selected for treatment if liver biopsy showed at least grade 2 inflammation and/or stage 2 fibrosis. All patients were to receive pegylated interferon (PEG)/regimens combining ribavirin (RBV) for an additional 48 wk after HCV undetectability. RESULTS Extended protocol treatment was initiated in thirty patients. Overall, 73% had end of treatment response and 60% had SVR. Nineteen patients completed treatment per protocol, of them, sixteen (84%) had end of treatment response, and fourteen (74%) achieved SVR. Both early virological response and 24-week virological response were individually associated with SVR but this association was not significant on multivariate analysis. Eleven patients (37%) discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. Cytopenias were the most common and most severe adverse effect, and required frquent growth factor use, dose adjustments and treatment cessations. The risk of rejection was not increased. CONCLUSION Recurrent HCV after LT can be safely treated with extended virological response-guided therpy using PEG/RBV, but requires close monitoring for treatment-related adverse effects, particularly cytopenias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikroo Hashemi
- Nikroo Hashemi, Victor Araya, Kashif Tufail, Laxmi Thumma-lakunta, Eyob Feyssa, Ashaur Azhar, Mumtaz Niazi, Division of Hepatology, Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19141, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Selzner N, Guindi M, Renner EL, Berenguer M. Immune-mediated complications of the graft in interferon-treated hepatitis C positive liver transplant recipients. J Hepatol 2011; 55:207-17. [PMID: 21145865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2010] [Revised: 11/23/2010] [Accepted: 11/23/2010] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the graft is universal and interferon based antiviral therapy remains at present the treatment of choice in HCV liver transplant recipients. Apart from the antiviral effects, interferon and ribavirin have both potent immunomodulatory properties resulting in a broad range of immune-related disorders including acute cellular rejection and chronic ductopenic rejection as well as de novo autoimmune hepatitis. Further complicating the picture, HCV infection per se is associated with a variety of autoimmune phenomena. We discuss here the immune-mediated complications and their relationship to chronic HCV and interferon based antiviral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia Selzner
- University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ponziani FR, Gasbarrini A, Pompili M, Burra P, Fagiuoli S. Management of hepatitis C virus infection recurrence after liver transplantation: an overview. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:291-5. [PMID: 21335208 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the major indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Its recurrence is virtually universal. Once reinfection is established, progression to cirrhosis occurs in 25%-30% of recipients within 5 years. Several studies have attempted to identify the ideal antiviral treatment for liver transplant recipients. At present, the management of recurrent HCV infection in liver transplant recipients is based on widely accepted indications, which represent a reliable guide to identify the "ideal" candidate for therapy, when therapy should be started, and what is to be expected in terms of side effects and response to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F R Ponziani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bzowej N, Nelson DR, Terrault NA, Everson GT, Teng LL, Prabhakar A, Charlton MR. PHOENIX: A randomized controlled trial of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin as a prophylactic treatment after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus. Liver Transpl 2011; 17:528-38. [PMID: 21506241 PMCID: PMC3736350 DOI: 10.1002/lt.22271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the prophylactic treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin are not known. LT recipients with HCV were randomized to peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment or observation 10 to 26 weeks post-LT. Prophylaxis patients received peginterferon alfa-2a (135 μg/week for 4 weeks and then 180 μg/week for 44 weeks) plus ribavirin (the initial dose of 400 mg/day was escalated to 1200 mg/day). Observation patients received the same regimen only upon significant HCV recurrence (histological activity index ≥ 3 and/or fibrosis score ≥ 2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with histological evidence of significant HCV recurrence 120 weeks after randomization. In all, 115 patients were randomized (prophylaxis arm, n = 55; observation arm, n = 60). Sustained virological response was achieved by 12 of 54 prophylaxis patients (22.2%) and by 3 of 14 observation patients who switched to treatment (21.4%). On an intent-to-treat basis, significant HCV recurrence at 120 weeks was similar in the prophylaxis (61.8%) and observation arms (65.0%, P = 0.725). The patient and graft survival rates and the rates of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection were similar in the 2 study arms. Approximately 70% of the treated patients in both arms had at least one dose reduction for safety reasons. The most common adverse event leading to treatment withdrawal was anemia. Because of the safety profile of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin and the lack of a clear benefit in terms of HCV recurrence and patient or graft survival, this study does not support the routine use of prophylactic antiviral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David R. Nelson
- Section of Hepatobiliary Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael R. Charlton
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yedibela S, Demir R, Melling N, Aydin Ü, Schuppan D, Müller V, Hohenberger W, Schönleben F. Antiviral re-treatment of IFN-Ribavirin non-responders for recurrent post-transplantation hepatitis C. Clin Transplant 2011; 25:131-5. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01201.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
46
|
Guillouche P, Féray C. Systematic review: anti-viral therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33:163-74. [PMID: 21083593 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04505.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the first cause of liver transplantation worldwide. Recurrence of infection is constant, and compromises patient and graft survival. AIM To provide an updated review of the main treatments of recurrent HCV. METHODS MEDLINE (1990 to August 2010) and national meeting abstract search. Search terms included hepatitis C, liver transplantation, treatment, sustained virological response. An emphasis was placed on randomised trials. RESULTS Anti-viral therapy based on pegylated interferon and ribavirin must be considered before liver transplantation, but is poorly tolerated and has poor results in patients with cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-viral therapy can be administrated systematically early after liver transplantation, or in patients with established recurrent chronic hepatitis. Combination of pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin results in a sustained virological response of up to 30% in patients with histological HCV recurrence. The results of a small trial of polyclonal anti-HCV to prevent recurrence were disappointing. CONCLUSIONS Currently available anti-viral therapy is effective only in a minority of transplanted patients infected with HCV. Specifically targeted anti-viral therapies combining interferon alpha and ribavirin, or a combination of antiprotease and antipolymerase components, associated with a genetic prediction of anti-viral response and blocking HCV cell entry should improve the long-term prognosis of recurrent hepatitis C in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Guillouche
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pillai A, Lee V, Wang E, Rinella M, Levitsky J. Factors Associated With Sustained Virological Response in Liver Transplant Recipients With Recurrent Hepatitis C. Transplant Proc 2010; 42:3647-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2010] [Accepted: 06/18/2010] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
48
|
Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation. HEPATITIS RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2010; 2010:475746. [PMID: 21151523 PMCID: PMC2989693 DOI: 10.1155/2010/475746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2010] [Revised: 08/13/2010] [Accepted: 10/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
A significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection develop liver cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease over two to three decades and require liver transplantation, however, reinfection is common and leads to further adverse events under immunosuppression. Pretransplant antiviral or preemptive therapy is limited to mildly decompensated patients due to poor tolerance. The mainstay of management represents directed antiviral therapy after evidence of recurrence of chronic hepatitis C. Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy is the current standard treatment with sustained viral response rates of 25% to 45%. The rate is lower than that in the immunocompetent population, partly due to the high prevalence of intolerability. To date, there is no general consensus regarding the antiviral treatment modality, timing, or dosing for HCV in patients with advanced liver disease and after liver transplantation. New anti-HCV drugs to delay disease progression or to enhance viral clearance are necessary.
Collapse
|
49
|
Aytaman A, Kaufman M, Terrault NA. Management of posttransplant hepatitis C infection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2010; 15:301-9. [PMID: 20445452 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e3283398237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of liver transplantation. Outcome of HCV-associated liver transplantation has been worse than transplantation from other causes. This is mostly related to universal recurrence of HCV in the allograft leading to graft and patient loss or retransplantation. Current antiviral therapies (AVTs) are inadequate and ineffective in the vast majority of the patients with intolerable side effects in most. However, a sustained virologic response (SVR) is associated with improved graft and patient survival. New specifically targeted AVTs for HCV (STAT-C) agents in development will significantly improve the success of AVT. This review focuses on recent data in peritransplant management of HCV with special emphasis on predictors of outcome, diagnosis, prevention and control of reinfection with newer treatments on the horizon. RECENT FINDINGS In the immediate pretransplant setting, AVT should be considered in select patients to eradicate the virus. Careful donor selection, immunosuppression (IMS) modulation with steroid and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization, avoidance of T-cell-depleting treatments and acute rejection episodes, and control of metabolic syndrome can improve allograft outcomes and improve the response to AVT. AVT prior to significant damage to the allograft is strongly recommended. SUMMARY With modified novel IMS protocols, careful donor selection, and AVT prior to significant damage to the allograft we can improve the outcome of posttransplant hepatitis C infection. Albeit there are no available data on new antiviral agents, STAT-Cs will have a significant impact in this setting in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayse Aytaman
- VA New York Harbor HCS Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York 11209, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jiménez-Pérez M, Sáez-Gómez AB, Pérez-Daga JA, Lozano-Rey JM, de la Cruz-Lombardo J, Rodrigo-López JM. Hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation: analysis of factors related to sustained viral response. Transplant Proc 2010; 42:666-8. [PMID: 20304219 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence, analyzing possible factors associated with sustained viral responses (SVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-one patients (25 men and 16 women) of overall mean age of 50 years (range, 33-60) with recurrent HCV were treated with peg-IFN plus ribavirin including 33 (80%) subjects displayed genotype 1. The following variables were analyzed: gender, donor and recipient ages, immunosuppressant, genotype, treatment duration, early viral response (EVR), pretreatment viral load, degree of fibrosis, levels of alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase (IU/L), time since liver transplantation (OLT), use of stimulating factors (epoetin and granulocyte colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) and side effects, and their association with SVR. The time from OLT to the start of treatment was 29 months (range, 6-90). Seventy-one percent of patients received cyclosporine and 29% tacrolimus. RESULTS The mean treatment duration was 31 (range, 4-72) months with an EVR achieved in 12/38 (31.5%) of patients and a SVR in 16/41 (39%). Treatment was discontinued in 23 patients due to side effects. Epoetin was necessary in 29% and G-CSF in 10%. There were 3 cases of rejection (1 mild and 2 severe culminating in death). On univariate analysis genotype non-1B (P < .02), pretherapy RNA (P < .02), complete treatment, and EVR (P < .005) were the only variables associated with SVR. The mean donor age of 43 years showed no statistical significance. CONCLUSION Therapy with peg-IFN plus ribavirin achieves an acceptable SVR, although not entirely free from severe side effects. Ensuring completion of the full treatment course is fundamental to achieve SVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jiménez-Pérez
- Unidad de Hepatología-Trasplante Hepático, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Málaga, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|