Outcomes after living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in Japan: results of a nationwide survey

TEMPORARY REMOVAL: A novel scoring system to predict short-term mortality after living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Adults With High Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score: The US Experience

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores are not well characterized in the United States.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data in adults listed for their first liver transplant alone between 2002 and 2021. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of MELD score (<20, 20-24, 25-29, and ≥30) and patient/graft survival after LDLT and the association of donor type (living versus deceased) on outcomes stratified by MELD.

RESULTS

There were 4495 LDLTs included with 5.9% at MELD 25-29 and 1.9% at MELD ≥30. LDLTs at MELD 25-29 and ≥30 LDLT have substantially increased since 2010 and 2015, respectively. Patient survival at MELD ≥30 was not different versus MELD <20: adjusted hazard ratio 1.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.88). However, graft survival was worse: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.68). Compared with deceased-donor liver transplant, LDLT led to superior patient survival at MELD <20 (aHR 0.92; P = 0.024) and 20-24 (aHR 0.70; P < 0.001), equivalent patient survival at MELD 25-29 (aHR 0.97; P = 0.843), but worse graft survival at MELD ≥30 (aHR 1.68, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patient survival remains acceptable, the benefits of LDLT may be lost at MELD ≥30.

Rituximab administration one week before ABO-incompatible liver transplantation due to drug-induced acute liver failure with hepatic coma: a case report

In cases of acute liver failure (ALF) with hepatic coma, early liver transplantation, including ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), should be considered. The ABO antibody barrier can be reduced using plasma exchange (PE) and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Plasma exchange is also performed for drug-induced ALF and is effective for desensitization. Rituximab treatment usually requires 14 days. There is presently no established desensitization protocol for ABOi-LDLT for ALF. Here, we report a case of drug-induced ALF with hepatic coma, which was treated with ABOi-LDLT using PE and rituximab 8 days prior to surgery. A 33-year-old female, with a history of headaches for which she was taking analgesics daily, developed drug-induced ALF with hepatic coma. Her ABOi sister desired to become a liver donor. We initiated desensitization using rituximab (500 mg) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 2000 mg/day), followed by five sessions of PE. Eight days after rituximab administration, ABOi-LDLT with splenectomy was performed. Postoperatively, the patient received local infusion via portal vein for 14 days and immunosuppression with tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, and MMF. No episode of cellular or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was observed. The patient was discharged uneventfully 56 days after ABOi-LDLT with no problems up to 15 months after the transplant.

Outcomes of patients with acute liver failure listed for liver transplantation: A multicenter prospective cohort analysis

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving treatment for patients with acute liver failure (ALF). Currently, there are few detailed data regarding long-term outcomes after LT for ALF. We combined prospective data from the Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG) Registry with those of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to assess outcomes among consecutive patients with ALF listed for LT. Cohort analysis of detailed pretransplantation data for patients listed for LT for ALF in the ALFSG Registry between January 1998 and October 2018 matched with transplantation-related data from the SRTR. Primary outcomes were 1- and 3-year post-LT patient survival. Secondary outcome was receipt of LT; independent associations with successful receipt of LT were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Of 624 patients with ALF listed for LT, 398 (64%) underwent LT, 100 (16%) died without LT, and 126 (20%) recovered spontaneously. Among LT recipients, etiologies included seronegative/indeterminate (22%), drug-induced liver injury (18%), acetaminophen overdose (APAP; 16%), and viral hepatitis (15%). The 1- and 3-year post-LT patient survival rates were 91% and 90%, respectively. Comparing those dying on the waiting list versus with those who received LT, the former had more severe multiorgan failure, reflected by increased vasopressor use (65% vs. 22%), mechanical ventilation (84% vs. 57%), and renal replacement therapy (57% vs. 30%; p  < 0.0001 for all). After adjusting for relevant covariates, age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.04), APAP etiology (aOR 2.72, 95% CI 1.42-5.23), requirement for vasopressors (aOR 4.19, 95% CI 2.44-7.20), Grade III/IV hepatic encephalopathy (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.29-4.72), and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09; p  < 0.05 for all) were independently associated with death without receipt of LT. Post-LT outcomes for ALF are excellent in this cohort of very ill patients. The development of multiorgan failure while on the transplantation list and APAP ALF etiology were associated with a lower likelihood of successful receipt of LT.

Management of Acute Liver Failure: Update 2022

Abbreviated pathogenesis and clinical course of the acute liver failure syndrome. The pathogenesis and clinical course of the syndrome of acute liver failure (ALF) differs depending upon the etiology of the primary liver injury. In turn, the severity of the liver injury and resulting synthetic failure is often the primary determinant of whether a patient is referred for emergency liver transplantation. Injuries by viral etiologies trigger the innate immune system via pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), while toxin-induced (and presumably ischemia-induced) injuries do so via damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The course of the clinical syndrome further depends upon the relative intensity and composition of cytokine release, resulting in an early proinflammatory phenotype (SIRS) and later compensatory anti-inflammatory response phenotype (CARS). The outcomes of overwhelming immune activation are the systemic (extrahepatic) features of ALF (cardiovascular collapse, cerebral edema, acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, sepsis) which ultimately determine the likelihood of death.Acute liver failure (ALF) continues to carry a high risk of mortality or the need for transplantation despite recent improvements in overall outcomes over the past two decades. Optimal management begins with identifying that liver failure is indeed present and its etiology, since outcomes and the need for transplantation vary widely across the different etiologies. Most causes of ALF can be divided into hyperacute (ischemia and acetaminophen) and subacute types (other etiologies), based on time of evolution of signs and symptoms of liver failure; the former evolve in 3 to 4 days and the latter typically in 2 to 4 weeks. Both involve intense release of cytokines and hepatocellular contents into the circulation with multiorgan effects/consequences.Management involves optimizing fluid balance and cardiovascular support, including the use of continuous renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, and pulmonary ventilation. Early evaluation for liver transplantation is advised particularly for acetaminophen toxicity, which evolves so rapidly that delay is likely to lead to death.Vasopressor support, high-grade hepatic encephalopathy, and unfavorable (subacute) etiologies heighten the need for urgent listing for liver transplantation. Prognostic scores such as Kings Criteria, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, and the Acute Liver Failure Group prognostic index take these features into account and provide reasonable but imperfect predictive accuracy. Future treatments may include liver support devices and/or agents that improve hepatocyte regeneration.

Complementary Roles of Cadaveric and Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Acute Liver Failure

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation may complement cadaveric transplantation in acute liver failure (ALF) patients.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2017, 89 patients were treated for ALF; 15 patients (17%) recovered with intensive care treatment; 31 (35%) died without transplant. The records of the remaining 43 patients (median (range) age: 14 (1-62)) who underwent transplantation were evaluated.

RESULTS

The etiologic factors were toxic agents (10; mushrooms: 8; herbs: 2), hepatitis viruses (7; A: 1; B: 6), Wilson's disease (7), autoimmune hepatitis (4), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (2); 13 cases were idiopathic. Cadaveric organs (whole, split, reduced) were transplanted to 32 patients; 11 patients underwent living donor transplantation. One patient (2%) died of septic shock on the second postoperative day. Bacterial infection was the most common early (< 3 months) complication in the remaining patients (31/42; 74%), followed by delirium (5/42; 12%) and acute rejection requiring steroid pulse (5/42; 12%). Seven other patients died during median (range) follow-up of 94 (14-142) months: various infections (5), leukemia (1), and acute myocardial infarction (1). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 100%, 96%, and 92% in children and 94%, 82%, and 65% in adults respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadaveric organ sharing and transplantation from living donors when appropriate yield a high survival rate, despite high early morbidity, in ALF patients whose conditions deteriorate despite intensive care treatment. Efforts to eliminate preventable causes of acute liver failure will lead to more efficient use of health care resources.

Liver transplantation in acute liver failure: Dilemmas and challenges

Acute liver failure (ALF) refers to a state of severe hepatic injury that leads to altered coagulation and sensorium in the absence of pre-existing liver disease. ALF has different causes, but the clinical characteristics are strikingly similar. In clinical practice, however, inconsistency in the definition of ALF worldwide and confusion regarding the existence of pre-existing liver disease raise diagnostic dilemmas. ALF mortality rates used to be over 80% in the past; however, survival rates on medical treatment have significantly improved in recent years due to a greater understanding of pathophysiology and advances in critical care management. The survival rates in acetaminophen-associated ALF have become close to the post-transplant survival rates. Given that liver transplantation (LT) is an expensive treatment that involves a major surgical operation in critically ill patients and lifelong immunosuppression, it is very important to select accurate patients who may benefit from it. Still, emergency LT remains a lifesaving procedure for many ALF patients. However, there is a lack of consistency in current prognostic models that hampers the selection of transplant candidates in a timely and precise manner. The other problems associated with LT in ALF are the shortage of graft, development of contraindications on the waiting list, vaguely defined delisting criteria, time constraints for pre-transplant evaluation, ethical concerns, and comparatively poor post-transplant outcomes in ALF. Therefore, there is a desperate need to establish accurate prognostic models and explore the roles of evolving adjunctive and alternative therapies, such as liver support systems, plasma exchange, stem cells, auxiliary LT, and so on, to enhance transplant-free survival and to fill the void created by the graft shortage

An Approach to Drug-Induced Liver Injury from the Geriatric Perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With its high variability in both presentation and severity, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex condition increasingly confronting all providers. DILI has an even more muddled presentation among the geriatric population due to age-related changes in liver physiology and biochemistry as well as polypharmacy common in the geriatric population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most cases of DILI are idiosyncratic and unpredictable. DILI, especially related to herbal and dietary supplement (HDS) use, is increasingly recognized as a leading cause of acute liver failure and need for liver transplantation. Unfortunately, liver transplantation is a limited option for the elderly, a population that exhibits significant HDS use. One recent study suggests that early use of N-acetylcysteine may be useful in preventing progression to acute liver failure in non-acetaminophen DILI. In the future, a personalized medicine approach using genomic signatures may be feasible to prevent DILI. This review serves to raise recognition of the unique aspects of DILI in the geriatric population to promote rapid diagnosis and early intervention to prevent progression to liver failure and death. For now, DILI remains a diagnosis of exclusion, and care providers for the elderly must focus on obtaining a thorough history that includes HDS use and intervening early in suspected DILI cases.

Analysis of the safety of pretransplant corticosteroid therapy in patients with acute liver failure and late-onset hepatic failure in Japan

Background and Aim

In Japan, corticosteroids have been commonly used as a part of multidisciplinary therapy for patients with acute liver failure and late‐onset hepatic failure. However, there is controversy regarding the development of infections and other complications. In this study, the influence of corticosteroids on patient outcomes after liver transplantation was investigated.

Methods

This study included 167 patients with acute liver failure and late‐onset hepatic failure who underwent liver transplantation between 2010 and 2015. The effects of pretransplant corticosteroid therapy on patient outcomes were evaluated using a database constructed by the subcommittee for fulminant hepatitis in the Intractable Hepato‐Biliary Diseases Study Group of Japan.

Results

The subacute type and the median total bilirubin levels were higher in those receiving corticosteroids than in those not receiving corticosteroids. Although infections tended to be higher in patients receiving corticosteroids, pretransplant corticosteroid administration did not affect the survival rates. The duration from corticosteroid initiation to liver transplantation was longer in patients who developed infections. The survival rates, however, did not differ between patients with and without infections.

Conclusions

Corticosteroids were administered to patients with poor prognoses. Otherwise, the overall outcome in those administered corticosteroids was not significantly different from that in those administered without corticosteroids. Although infectious complications tended to occur, they were generally controllable and nonfatal. Pretransplant corticosteroid therapy may be permissible, with regarding for infections and performed within the minimum duration.

Infections developing in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Recipients of living donors may be more prone to bacterial/fungal infections

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite surgical advances in liver transplantation and effective prophylactic strategies, posttransplant infections are the most important cause of morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis and management of infections because of developing immunosuppression is difficult and adversely affects mortality. This study aimed to review bacterial and fungal infections in patients after liver transplantation and to reveal the resistance rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 107 patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2017 and February 2018 were evaluated retrospectively with regard to demographic characteristics, causes of transplantation, conditions that may lead to infection, postoperative infections, pathogens, and resistance patterns.

RESULTS

Of the 107 patients who underwent liver transplantation, 48 (44.8%) had an infection. Bacterial infections were detected in 41% of the patients, and fungal infections were found in 13%. When we compared living and cadaveric transplants in terms of infection development, these rates were found to be 53% and 33%, respectively (p=0.034). No statistically significant results could be obtained when evaluating conditions such as sex, presence of underlying primary disease, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease MELD score, diabetes status, total parenteral nutrition, and risk factors for infection.

CONCLUSION

After liver transplantation, infections are often seen in the first month of the postoperative period. Knowing the most common pathogens and resistance states in this process reduces infection-related deaths by providing appropriate treatment regimens at the right time.

Outcome of patients with acute liver failure awaiting liver transplantation in Japan

AIM

To clarify the outcome and predictive factors in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) awaiting deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Japan.

METHODS

Of the DDLT candidates in Japan between 2007 and 2016, 264 adult patients with ALF were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Factors associated with DDLT and waiting-list mortality were assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model. The DDLT and transplant-free survival probabilities were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The waiting-list registration year after the Transplant Law revision in 2010 was a significant factor associated with DDLT. The adjusted hazard ratio indicated that DDLT probability after 2010 was four times higher than that before, and the 28-day cumulative DDLT probability was more than 35%. The median survival time of the entire cohort was 40 days. Multivariate analysis identified the following three factors associated with waiting-list mortality: age, coma grade, and international normalized ratio. The transplant-free survival probabilities were significantly stratified by the number of risks, and patients with all three risks showed extremely poor short-term prognosis (median survival time = 23 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The DDLT probability of ALF patients increased after the law revision in 2010; however, patients at high risk of short-term waiting-list mortality might need emergent living donor transplantation.

Indian National Association for the Study of Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part-2): Management of Acute Liver Failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is not an uncommon complication of a common disease such as acute hepatitis. Viral hepatitis followed by antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity are the commonest causes of ALF in India. Clinically, such patients present with appearance of jaundice, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and cerebral edema are central and most important clinical event in the course of ALF, followed by superadded infections, and determine the outcome in these patients. The pathogenesis of encephalopathy and cerebral edema in ALF is unique and multifactorial. Ammonia plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis, and several therapies aim to correct this abnormality. The role of newer ammonia-lowering agents is still evolving. These patients are best managed at a tertiary care hospital with facility for liver transplantation (LT). Aggressive intensive medical management has been documented to salvage a substantial proportion of patients. In those with poor prognostic factors, LT is the only effective therapy that has been shown to improve survival. However, recognizing suitable patients with poor prognosis has remained a challenge. Close monitoring, early identification and treatment of complications, and couseling for transplant form the first-line approach to manage such patients. Recent research shows that use of dynamic prognostic models is better for selecting patients undergoing liver transplantation and timely transplant can save life of patients with ALF with poor prognostic factors.

The role of living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a life-threatening illness that occurs in the absence of pre-existing liver disease. When symptoms seriously progress under continuous supportive medical care, liver transplantation becomes the only therapeutic strategy. However, the available sources of organs for liver transplantation differ worldwide. In regions in which organs from cadaveric donors are more common, deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is performed in this urgent situation. Conversely, in countries where cadaveric donors are scarce, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the only choice. Special considerations must be made for urgent LDLT for ALF, including the expedited evaluation of living donors, technical issues, and the limitations of ABO blood type combinations between recipients and donor candidates. In this review, we highlight the role of LDLT for ALF and the considerations that distinguish it from DDLT. LDLT is well-established as a life-saving procedure for ALF patients and there is often no alternative to LDLT, especially in countries where DDLT is not feasible. However, from a global perspective, an increase in the deceased donor pool might be an urgent and important necessity.

Acute Liver Failure Secondary to Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most common cause of acute liver failure (ALF) in Western countries. Without liver transplantation, the mortality rate for ALF approaches greater than 80%. Acetaminophen-related ALF may be associated with a rapid progression but fortunately has a high chance for spontaneous survival compared with idiosyncratic DILI-related ALF. Several prognostic scoring systems for severe DILI have been developed to aid clinicians in selecting patients who require urgent liver transplantation. Patients who undergo liver transplantation for ALF are at risk for early graft loss and death and should be closely followed.

Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure in Presence of Acute Kidney Injury

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a catastrophic illness, which is associated with high mortality in absence of liver transplantation. ALF is associated with multisystem involvement including acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI worsens the already poor prognosis of ALF. There is limited literature on impact of AKI on outcomes of liver transplantation (LT). The use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may have a role in transplant-free survival or bridging to LT. Although results suggest a somewhat lower survival in patients with ALF and AKI, LT is a life-saving option and should not be deferred in absence of other contraindications. In the current review, we discuss impact of AKI on transplant-free survival, possible role of CRRT, and role of LT in patients with ALF associated with AKI.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure: Donor Safety and Recipient Outcome

In countries where deceased organ donation is sparse, emergency living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the only lifesaving option in select patients with acute liver failure (ALF). The aim of the current study is living liver donor safety and recipient outcomes following LDLT for ALF. A total of 410 patients underwent LDLT between March 2011 and February 2018, out of which 61 (14.9%) were for ALF. All satisfied the King's College criteria (KCC). Median admission to transplant time was 48 hours (range, 24-80.5 hours), and median living donor evaluation time was 18 hours (14-20 hours). Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 37 (32-40) with more than two-thirds having grade 3 or 4 encephalopathy and 70% being on mechanical ventilation. The most common etiology was viral (37%). Median jaundice-to-encephalopathy time was 15 (9-29) days. Preoperative culture was positive in 47.5%. There was no difference in the complication rate among emergency and elective living liver donors (13.1% versus 21.2%; P = 0.19). There was no donor mortality. For patients who met the KCC but did not undergo LT, survival was 22.8% (29/127). The 5-year post-LT actuarial survival was 65.57% with a median follow-up of 35 months. On multivariate analysis, postoperative worsening of cerebral edema (CE; hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-6.31), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS; HR, 16.7; 95% CI, 2.05-136.7), preoperative culture positivity (HR, 6.54; 95% CI, 2.24-19.07), and a longer anhepatic phase duration (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) predicted poor outcomes. In conclusion, emergency LDLT is lifesaving in selected patients with ALF. Outcomes of emergency living liver donation were comparable to that of elective donors. Postoperative worsening of CE, preoperative SIRS, and sepsis predicted outcome after LDLT for ALF.

Neurological Recovery After Recovery From Acute Liver Failure: Is it Complete?

Neurologic dysfunction characterised by Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE) and cerebral oedema are the most dramatic presentations of Acute Liver Failure (ALF) and signify poor outcome. Improved critical care and wider availability of emergency Liver Transplantation (LT) has improved survivability in ALF. In most cases absence of clinically overt encephalopathy after spontaneous recovery from ALF or after LT is thought to indicate complete neurologic recovery. Recent data suggests that neurologic recovery may not always be complete. Instances of persistent neurologic dysfunction as well as neuropsychiatric abnormalities are now being recognised and warrant active follow up of these patients. Although evidences irreversible neurologic damage is uncommon after ALF, neuropsychiatric disturbances are not uncommon. Complex pathogenesis is involved in neurocognitive disorders seen after many other conditions including LT that require critical care. Structural damage and persistent neurological abnormalities seen after ALF are more likely to be related to cerebral edema, raised intracranial tension and cerebral hypoxemia, while neurocognitive dysfunctions may be a part of a wider spectrum of disorders commonly seen among those who recover from any critical illness.

Liver Fibrosis Markers Improve Prediction of Outcome in Non-Acetaminophen-Associated Acute Liver Failure

A prognostic system for acute liver failure (ALF) with a higher predictive value is urgently needed. The role of extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in ALF has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that serologic fibrosis markers, which reflect ECM remodeling, are predictive of ALF outcome at first presentation. This observational study included 110 patients with acute liver dysfunction, of which 73 had non-acetaminophen-associated ALF (NAA-ALF). We evaluated serum levels of hyaluronic acid, 7S domain of type IV collagen (4COL7S), and Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein at first presentation to a tertiary center. Serologic fibrosis markers were significantly higher in NAA-ALF compared with acute hepatitis. Elevated hyaluronic acid and 4COL7S levels at first presentation correlated significantly with worse clinical outcomes. 4COL7S, along with age, ammonia, and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, was a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis; 4COL7S correlated significantly with coagulopathy, decreased hepatic synthetic functions, advanced hepatic encephalopathy, and liver atrophy and also predicted 180-day transplant-free survival. Cox regression models incorporating 4COL7S with the MELD system had profoundly improved predictive values that significantly surpassed the MELD system alone. Conclusion: Elevation of serologic fibrosis markers reflecting ECM remodeling in NAA-ALF predicted a worse clinical outcome. Incorporation of 4COL7S at first presentation to a transplant center improves the specificity while retaining the sensitivity of the MELD system. External validation of a fibrosis marker as part of a clinical prediction tool in ALF warrants further investigation.

Key roles of hepatologists in successful liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) has been carried out for acute liver failure, end-stage liver disease, and congenital metabolic disease in more than 7000 cases in Japan. Liver transplantation has been established as a treatment option, and survival rates have improved. In 2016, a new registration/allocation policy and a new scoring system for deceased donor LT were established. The management of perioperative patients and preoperative therapy for liver failure, nutrition, and preventing infection were upgraded. Moreover, methods for preventing disease recurrence, and treating hepatitis C and B have been developed and are particularly crucial for good outcomes in LT. Treatment of the complications of obesity, lifestyle-related diseases, and malignancy is also required post-LT. Managing patients after LT contributes to better survival and quality of life. The role of hepatologists is becoming broader and more important.

Beyond KCH selection and options in acute liver failure

The King’s prognostic criteria for patients with acute liver failure (ALF) introduced in 1989 have been used worldwide. This distinguished for the first time cases with ‘hyper-acute’ course (characteristically paracetamol overdose) where there is a better chance of recovery with medical supportive care alone from those etiologies with a less acute course and paradoxically lower chances of ‘spontaneous’ recovery. Ongoing use showed the limited sensitivity of the criteria to constitute a significant practical limitation. Subsequent models including the MELD score and composite ones with markers of necrosis, an apoptotic liver cell death, proposed to improve sensitivity did not have the required high specificity. Two recent models utilizing new availability of web- and app-based computing delivering outcome predication through sophisticated algorithms are described. The first is a dynamic model described for paracetamol-induced ALF based upon admission findings and sequential variables over the first 2 days. The new model of the US Acute Liver Failure group was devised to cover all etiologies of ALF for predicting ‘transplant-free’ survival and accurately predicated spontaneous survival in two-thirds of cases. Improved survival results with medical management, particularly in hyper-acute cases, now approach those obtained with successful liver transplant and have raised the question of transplant benefit. Also considered in the review are new non-transplant approaches to treatment including the use of plasma exchange and based on successful results in acute-on-chronic liver failure, agents to modulate and improve hepatic regeneration.

Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure

With the advent of liver transplant for acute liver failure (ALF), survival rate has improved drastically. Liver transplant for ALF accounts for 8% of all transplant cases. The 1-year survival rates are 79% in Europe and 84% in the United States. Some patients with ALF may recover spontaneously, and approximately half will undergo liver transplant. It is imperative to identify patients with ALF as soon as possible to transfer them to a liver transplant center for a thorough evaluation. Emergent liver transplant in a patient with ALF may place the patient at risk for severe complications in the postoperative period.

Good outcome of living donor liver transplantation in drug-induced acute liver failure: A single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced acute liver failure (ALF) is associated with high mortality. There is limited literature on results of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India. All patients who received LDLT for drug-induced ALF were included. The data are shown as median (IQR).

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients (15 females and three males), aged 34 (25-45) years, underwent LDLT for drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-related ALF. Etiology of ALF was antitubercular medications (n=14), orlistat (n=1), flutamide (n=1), and complementary alternative medications (n=2). The baseline parameters were as following: bilirubin 17.7 (16.3-23.8) mg/dL, INR 3.3 (2.5-4.0), jaundice encephalopathy interval 6 (3-17.5) days, arterial ammonia 109 μmol/L (73-215), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 24 (18-33), grade of encephalopathy 2 (1-4), which progressed to grade 3 (3-4) before transplantation. All patients underwent right lobe LDLT; hospital stay was 17 (13-22) days, and ICU stay was 5 (5-7) days. Two patients died in the first month after liver transplantation due to sepsis and multi-organ failure; the rest of the patients are alive and doing well at a follow-up of 50 (4-82 months).

CONCLUSION

Good outcomes can be obtained by LDLT for drug-induced ALF.

Acute liver failure in children-Is living donor liver transplantation justified?

OBJECTIVES

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) has become an acceptable alternative to transplantation from deceased donors (DDLT). The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of LDLT in pediatric patients with ALF based on our center's experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 63 children (at our institution) with ALF who underwent liver transplantation between 1997 and 2016. Among them 24 (38%) underwent a LDLT and 39 (62%) received a DDLT. Retrospectively analyzed patient clinical data included: time lapse between qualification for transplantation and transplant surgery, graft characteristics, postoperative complications, long-term results post-transplantation, and living donor morbidity. Overall, we have made a comparison of clinical results between LDLT and DDLT groups.

RESULTS

Follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 182 months (median 109 months) for LDLT patients and 12 to 183 months (median 72 months) for DDLT patients. The median waiting time for a transplant was shorter in LDLT group than in DDLT group. There was not a single case of primary non-function (PNF) in the LDLT group and 20 out of 24 patients (83.3%) had good early graft function; 3 patients (12.5%) in the LDLT group died within 2 months of transplantation but there was no late mortality. In comparison, 4 out of 39 patients (10.2%) had PNF in DDLT group while 20 patients (51.2%) had good early graft function; 8 patients (20.5%) died early within 2 months and 2 patients (5.1%) died late after transplantation. The LDLT group had a shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) of 4 hours in comparison to 9.2 hours in the DDLT group (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

LDLT is a lifesaving procedure for pediatric patients with ALF. Our experience showed that it may be performed with very good results, and with very low morbidity and no mortality among living donors when performed by experienced teams following strict procedures.

Live donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: A single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an indication for emergency liver transplantation (LT). Although centers performing only deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT) have shown improved outcomes in this situation, they still have relatively long waiting lists. An alternative would be living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which has shown equivalent outcomes in the elective situation but there is limited evidence of its results in ALF.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes in patients with ALF undergoing emergency LDLT in our center in Delhi, India.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on 479 patients who underwent LT in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2015 to evaluate the outcomes of those with ALF. The ALF patients were listed for transplantation after they met the Kings' College criteria and rapid evaluation was done following a protocol consisting of three phases. Patients with grade III/IV encephalopathy were put on mechanical ventilation. Data regarding their postoperative course, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (7.5%) out of the 479 patients underwent emergency LT for ALF. Their mean age was 27.5 years (range 4-59 years) and the male to female ratio of 2:3. Preoperative intubation was required in 15 of 25 patients who had encephalopathy. Wilson's disease was the most common cause of ALF in children while in adults, it was acute viral hepatitis. The time interval between listing and transplantation was a mean of 36 ± 12.4 h. The mean graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.06 ± 0.3. The recipients were extubated postoperatively after a mean period of 2.6 days and their mean ICU stay was 6.3 days. Postoperative infection was the most common complication and required upgradation of antifungal and antibiotic treatments. Neurological complications occurred in five patients. Thirty-one of 36 (86.1%) patients survived and progressive cerebral edema and sepsis were the most common causes of mortality. Patients who died had higher model for end-stage liver disease scores, longer cold ischemia time (CIT), and higher grades of encephalopathy (though 80% patients with encephalopathy survived). There was no donor mortality. At long-term follow up of a median of 56 months, 29 (80.5%) of 36 patients were still alive.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, LDLT is an alternative procedure to DDLT in patients with ALF and is associated with good outcomes even in patients with high grades of encephalopathy.

Outcome comparison of liver transplantation for hepatitis A-related versus hepatitis B-related acute liver failure in adult recipients

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) can cause acute liver failure (ALF). This study compares outcomes between liver transplantation (LT) for HAV-related ALF (HAV-ALF) and LT for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related ALF (HBV-ALF). Of 3616 adult LTs performed between January 2005 and December 2014, we performed LT for HAV-ALF recipients (n = 29) and LT for HBV-ALF recipients (n = 34). HAV-ALF group included 18 males and 11 females with mean age of 33.1 years. Graft survival rates in HAV-ALF and HBV-ALF were 65.5% and 88.0% (1 year) and 65.5% and 84.0% (5 years) (P = .048). Patient survival rates in HAV-ALF and HBV-ALF were 69.0% and 88.0% (1 year) and 69.0% and 84.0% (5 years) (P = .09). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that acute pancreatitis and HAV recurrence were independent risk factors of graft and patient survival. Post-transplant outcome was poorer in patients with HAV-ALF than in those with HBV-ALF. This weakens LT's appropriateness in HAV-ALF patients with pancreatitis. HAV recurrence after LT for HAV-ALF is common and often fatal; thus, HAV recurrence should be monitored vigilantly, beginning early post-transplant.

Living donor liver transplantation for neonatal fulminant hepatitis due to herpes simplex virus infection

Although rare, ALF caused by disseminated HSV infection is associated with high mortality in the neonatal population. This condition is often diagnosed relatively late due to the absence of specific signs. We present a case involving a neonate with ALF submitted to living donor liver transplantation without a prior diagnosis. The patient had no skin or mucosal lesions, and IgM serology was negative for HSV-1 and HSV-2. Immunohistochemical staining of the liver explant was positive for herpes virus infection, and the patient subsequently received antiviral drug treatment, with a good outcome. Due to organ shortages and the rarity of the aforementioned condition, LT has seldom been reported for the treatment of ALF caused by herpes virus infection; however, LT may be the only option for neonates with fulminant hepatitis. The use of living donors in an urgent scenario is well established in Eastern countries and safely applicable for pediatric patients with ALF.

The International Liver Transplantation Society Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipient Guideline

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been increasingly embraced around the world as an important strategy to address the shortage of deceased donor livers. The aim of this guideline, approved by the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), is to provide a collection of expert opinions, consensus, and best practices surrounding LDLT. Recommendations were developed from an analysis of the National Library of Medicine living donor transplantation indexed literature using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Writing was guided by the ILTS Policy on the Development and Use of Practice Guidelines (www.ilts.org). Intended for use by physicians, these recommendations support specific approaches to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of care of living donor liver transplant recipients.

Compared to cadaveric liver transplantation, live donor LT (LDLT) is challenged by ethical, medical and surgical considerations, many of which are still unresolved. The aim of this guideline is to provide a collection of expert opinions, consensus, and best practices surrounding LDLT.

Appropriate timing to start and optimal response evaluation of high-dose corticosteroid therapy for patients with acute liver failure

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid therapy has been commonly administered to patients with acute liver injury (ALI)/acute liver failure (ALF) in Japan to prevent the development of hepatic encephalopathy, but the appropriate timing to start corticosteroid therapy has not been determined and optimal response evaluation of the therapy has not been conducted. We prospectively investigated the optimal timing to start therapy on the established severity indication: the Japan Hepatic Encephalopathy Prediction Model (JHEPM) and prothrombin time (PT).

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 469 patients with ALI/ALF from 2004 to 2015. We evaluated 44 patients with ALF on high-dose corticosteroid therapy before hepatic coma development. The predictive performance for coma development was assessed using the receiver operator curve method in both PT and JHEPM probability the day before administering high-dose corticosteroid therapy.

RESULTS

Among these patients, nine developed hepatic coma after the therapy. Selection bias was adjusted using propensity score method. High-dose corticosteroid therapy tended to decrease the risk of coma development although there was no statistical significance. The cut-off value of 53%, 1.95, and 39% in JHEPM probability, PT-international normalized ratio (PT-INR), and PT activity, respectively, showed high sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose the appropriate timing to start high-dose corticosteroid therapy in patients with ALI/ALF; 40% of JHEPM probability, 1.53 of PT-INR, and 52% of PT because these values were theoretically discriminated at 98% coverage to the patients with coma. Because the study contained selection bias, the appropriate timing for therapy should be confirmed in a future prospective study.

Living donor liver transplantation: eliminating the wait for death in end-stage liver disease?

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALDLT), outside of Asia, remains an important yet underutilized gift of life. For patients with end-stage liver disease, A2ALDLT is a proven transplantation option, with lower waiting list mortality and suffering, and equivalent or better allograft and patient survival than deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The risks to living donors and the benefit to their recipients have been carefully defined with long-term level 1 and 2 evidence-based study. An overview of the development and practice of living donor liver transplant (LDLT), including donor and recipient surgical allograft innovation, is provided. The issues of recipient selection, outcomes and morbidity, including disease-variable study and challenges past and present are presented in comparison with DDLT cohorts, and future insights are described. Central to practice is the careful and concise review of donor evaluation and selection and donor outcome, morbidity, quality of life and present and future strategies for donor advocacy and growth of the technique.

Serum Procalcitonin in Patients with Acute Liver Failure

BACKGROUND

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a known diagnostic marker of bacterial infection. There are no previous reports of PCT concerning acute liver failure (ALF). We evaluated the clinical value of serum PCT levels in patients with ALF.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with acute hepatitis (19 men and 25 women; median age, 40 years; range, 20-79 years) were retrospectively enrolled from January 2001 and June 2015. PCT levels were measured by saved serum samples obtained within 3 days after admission. ALF was defined as prothrombin time (PT) < 40% regardless of hepatic encephalopathy.

RESULTS

Serum PCT levels were significantly higher in the patients with ALF (n = 16) than in those with non-ALF (n = 28) [0.25 (0.13-2.66) ng/mL vs. 0.165 (0.03-1.08), P = 0.00967]. Creatinine, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin were positively correlated, and PT was negatively correlated with PCT. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.74 for detecting ALF. With a PCT cut-off value of 0.5 ng/mL, the presence of ALF could be demonstrated with low sensitivity (37.5%) and high specificity (96.5%) with high positive (85.7%) and negative (72.9%) predictive value. Multivariate analysis showed that PCT was an independent factor associated with the presence of ALF. The cumulative survival rate was also significantly lower in patients with PCT ≥ 0.5 ng/mL (P = 0.0314), but it was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Serum PCT level was significantly higher in patients with ALF.

Elevated Soluble Platelet Glycoprotein VI Levels in Patients After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Plasma-soluble platelet glycoprotein VI (sGPVI) levels were examined in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the relationship between platelet activation and thrombocytopenia was evaluated to understand the mechanism of thrombocytopenia in LDLT. Platelet counts were significantly higher in the donors compared to the recipient, and the plasma sGPVI levels increased in both groups after the operation. Regarding the relationship between the platelet counts and the sGPVI levels, the slope varied on different days, and it became negative on day 3, suggesting that the plasma sGPVI levels are related to platelet activation in LDLT. The frequency of complications was high in the nonsurvivors. The platelet counts were higher in the survivors than in the nonsurvivors on days 14 and 28. Although the plasma levels of sGPVI in the survivors increased after the operation, those in the nonsurvivors were high only on day 3. Although the ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 domain, member 13) levels were markedly reduced, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and VWF propeptide (VWFpp) were markedly elevated during LDLT. The antithrombin activity was significantly lower (day 14) and VWFpp (day 28) was significantly higher in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors. These findings suggest that platelet activation first occurs after LDLT, and it is high in the nonsurvivors on day 3. Thereafter, the hemostatic abnormality and vascular endothelial cell injuries may appear on days 14 and 28.

The changing face of liver transplantation for acute liver failure: Assessment of current status and implications for future practice

The etiology and outcomes of acute liver failure (ALF) have changed since the definition of this disease entity in the 1970s. In particular, the role of emergency liver transplantation has evolved over time, with the development of prognostic scoring systems to facilitate listing of appropriate patients, and a better understanding of transplant benefit in patients with ALF. This review examines the changing etiology of ALF, transplant benefit, outcomes following transplantation, and future alternatives to emergency liver transplantation in this devastating condition.

Auxiliary partial liver transplantation for acute liver failure using "high risk" grafts: Case report

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a reversible disorder that is associated with an abrupt loss of hepatic mass, rapidly progressive encephalopathy and devastating complications. Despite its high mortality, an emergency liver transplantation nowadays forms an integral part in ALF management and has substantially improved the outcomes of ALF. Here, we report the case of a 32-year-old female patient who was admitted with grade IV hepatic encephalopathy (coma) following drug-induced ALF. We performed an emergency auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation with a “high risk” graft (liver macrovesicular steatosis approximately 40%) from a living donor. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 57 with normal liver function. Weaning from immunosuppression was achieved 9 mo after transplantation. A follow-up using CT scan showed a remarkable increase in native liver volume and gradual loss of the graft. More than 6 years after the transplantation, the female now has a 4-year-old child and has returned to work full-time without any neurological sequelae.

Liver transplantation in acute liver failure: A challenging scenario

Acute liver failure is a critical medical condition defined as rapid development of hepatic dysfunction associated with encephalopathy. The prognosis in these patients is highly variable and depends on the etiology, interval between jaundice and encephalopathy, age, and the degree of coagulopathy. Determining the prognosis for this population is vital. Unfortunately, prognostic models with both high sensitivity and specificity for prediction of death have not been developed. Liver transplantation has dramatically improved survival in patients with acute liver failure. Still, 25% to 45% of patients will survive with medical treatment. The identification of patients who will eventually require liver transplantation should be carefully addressed through the combination of current prognostic models and continuous medical assessment. The concerns of inaccurate selection for transplantation are significant, exposing the recipient to a complex surgery and lifelong immunosuppression. In this challenging scenario, where organ shortage remains one of the main problems, alternatives to conventional orthotopic liver transplantation, such as living-donor liver transplantation, auxiliary liver transplant, and ABO-incompatible grafts, should be explored. Although overall outcomes after liver transplantation for acute liver failure are improving, they are not yet comparable to elective transplantation.

Hepatic Hemodynamics and Elevation of Liver Stiffness as Possible Predictive Markers of Late-onset Hepatic Failure

A 52-year-old Japanese woman admitted to our hospital for the treatment of liver dysfunction due to an undetermined cause developed disorientation on the 58th hospital day and was diagnosed with late-onset liver failure. Abdominal ultrasound examinations were performed several times from the admission. Before the disorientation appeared, the results of the examinations revealed that the portal flow decreased, after which the hepatic arterial flow increased and the degree of liver stiffness became elevated. Although the pathophysiology of these changes remains unclear, hemodynamic changes and elevation of liver stiffness might be predictive markers of severe liver tissue damage.

Defining long-term outcomes with living donor liver transplantation in North America

OBJECTIVES

To compare long-term survival of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) at experienced transplant centers with outcomes of deceased donor liver transplant and identify key variables impacting patient and graft survival.

BACKGROUND

The Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study is a prospective multicenter National Institutes of Health study comparing outcomes of LDLT and deceased donor liver transplant and associated risks.

METHODS

Mortality and graft failure for 1427 liver recipients (963 LDLT) enrolled in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study who received transplant between January 1, 1998, and January 31, 2014, at 12 North American centers with median follow-up 6.7 years were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

Survival probability at 10 years was 70% for LDLT and 64% for deceased donor liver transplant. Unadjusted survival was higher with LDLT (hazard ratio = 0.76, P = 0.02) but attenuated after adjustment (hazard ratio = 0.98, P = 0.90) as LDLT recipients had lower mean model for end-stage liver disease (15.5 vs 20.4) and fewer received transplant from intensive care unit, were inpatient, on dialysis, were ventilated, or with ascites. Posttransplant intensive care unit days were less for LDLT recipients. For all recipients, female sex and primary sclerosing cholangitis were associated with improved survival, whereas dialysis and older recipient/donor age were associated with worse survival. Higher model for end-stage liver disease score was associated with increased graft failure. Era of transplantation and type of donated lobe did not impact survival in LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

LDLT provides significant long-term transplant benefit, resulting in transplantation at a lower model for end-stage liver disease score, decreased death on waitlist, and excellent posttransplant outcomes. Recipient diagnosis, disease severity, renal failure, and ages of recipient and donor should be considered in decision making regarding timing of transplant and donor options.Clinical Trials ID: NCT00096733.

Persistent liver biochemistry abnormalities are more common in older patients and those with cholestatic drug induced liver injury

OBJECTIVES

The long-term outcomes of patients with drug induced liver injury (DILI) are not well described. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and severity of persistent liver biochemistry abnormalities in DILI patients followed over 2 years.

METHODS

Subjects with evidence of liver injury at 6 months after DILI onset were offered a month 12 and 24 study visit.

RESULTS

Amongst the 99 patients with definite, probable, or very likely DILI and available laboratory data at 12 months after DILI onset, 74 (75%) had persistent liver injury (persisters) defined as a serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) or an alkaline phosphatase >ULN, while 25 (25%) had resolved liver injury (resolvers). On multivariate analysis, month 12 persisters were significantly older (52.6 vs. 43.7 years, P=0.01) and more likely to have a cholestatic lab profile at DILI onset (54 vs. 20%, P<0.01) than resolvers. The month 12 persisters also had significantly poorer SF-36 physical summary scores at DILI onset and throughout follow-up compared with the resolvers (P<0.01). Amongst the 17 subjects with a liver biopsy obtained at a median of 387 days after DILI onset, 9 had chronic cholestasis, 3 had steatohepatitis, and 3 had chronic hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In all, 75% of subjects with liver injury at 6 months after DILI onset have laboratory evidence of persistent liver injury during prolonged follow-up. Higher serum alkaline phosphatase levels at presentation and older patient age were independent predictors of persistent liver injury. Subjects with persistent liver injury at 12 months after DILI onset should be carefully monitored and assessed for liver disease progression.

Alpha-fetoprotein: A biomarker for the recruitment of progenitor cells in the liver in patients with acute liver injury or failure

AIM

The optimal conditions for hepatocyte proliferation should be clarified in an attempt to improve the impaired liver regeneration observed in patients with acute liver failure (ALF). In order to evaluate the significance of the serum α-fetoprotein (AFP). level and prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) as possible biomarkers of the proliferation of liver stem/progenitor cells (LPC) and mature hepatocytes (MH), respectively, we focused on donors of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and patients with acute liver injury (ALI), including ALF.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients with ALI/ALF and 11 donors for LDLT were evaluated. LPC induction was histologically evaluated using cytokeratin (CK)-7 staining in 45 ALI/ALF patients.

RESULTS

The AFP level was not apparently elevated during the observation period in any of the LDLT donors, whereas the serum AFP levels were substantially increased in the patients with ALI/ALF and significantly correlated with the number of CK-7 positive LPC in the liver, except for very severe damaged liver. All patients exhibiting an early peak in the AFP level prior to PT-INR elevation died.

CONCLUSION

The serum AFP level may reflect the induction of LPC in ALI/ALF patients. The substantial and persistent induction of LPC until sufficient regeneration of MH may be needed for a recovery from ALF. We herein demonstrate that the serum AFP level may be a serum marker of LPC in patients with ALI/ALF. A comparison of the serial changes in the AFP levels and PT-INR in our study patients showed impaired proliferation of LPC and delayed recovery of MH in the patients who died.

Live donor liver transplantation: a valid alternative for critically ill patients suffering from acute liver failure

We report the outcome of live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients suffering from acute liver failure (ALF). From 2006 to 2013, all patients with ALF who received a LDLT (n = 7) at our institution were compared to all ALF patients receiving a deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT = 26). Groups were comparable regarding pretransplant ICU stay (DDLT: 1 [0-7] vs. LDLT: 1 days [0-10]; p = 0.38), mechanical ventilation support (DDLT: 69% vs. LDLT: 57%; p = 0.66), inotropic drug requirement (DDLT: 27% vs. LDLT: 43%; p = 0.64) and dialysis (DDLT: 2 vs. LDLT: 0 patients; p = 1). Median evaluation time for live donors was 24 h (18-72 h). LDLT versus DDLT had similar incidence of overall postoperative complications (31% vs. 43%; p = 0.66). No difference was detected between LDLT and DDLT patients regarding 1- (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%), 3- (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%), and 5- (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%) year graft and patient survival (p = 0.63). No severe donor complication (Dindo-Clavien ≥3 b) occurred after live liver donation. ALF is a severe disease with high mortality on liver transplant waiting lists worldwide. Therefore, LDLT is an attractive option since live donor work-up can be expedited and liver transplantation can be performed within 24 h with excellent short- and long-term outcomes.

Hepatocyte transplantation attenuates the course of acute liver failure induced by thioacetamide in Lewis rats

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a clinical syndrome resulting from widespread damage of hepatocytes, with extremely high mortality rate. Urgent orthotopic liver transplantation was shown to be the most effective therapy for ALF but this treatment option is limited by scarcity of donor organs. Therefore, hepatocyte transplantation (Tx) has emerged as a new therapeutical measure for ALF, however, the first clinical applications proved unsatisfactory. Apparently, extensive preclinical studies are needed. Our aim was to examine if hepatocytes isolated from transgenic "firefly luciferase" Lewis rats into the recipient liver would attenuate the course of thioacetamide (TAA)-induced ALF in Lewis rats. Untreated Lewis rats after TAA administration showed a profound decrease in survival rate; no animal survived 54 h. The rats showed marked increases in plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities, in plasma level of bilirubin and ammonia (NH(3)), and in a significant decrease in plasma albumin. Hepatocyte Tx attenuated the course of TAA-induced ALF Lewis rats which was reflected by improved survival rate and reduced degree of liver injury showing as lowering of elevated plasma ALT, AST, NH(3) and bilirubin levels and increasing plasma albumin. In addition, bioluminescence imaging analyses have shown that in the TAA-damaged livers the transplanted hepatocyte were fully viable throughout the experiment. In conclusion, the results show that hepatocyte Tx into the liver can attenuate the course of TAA-induced ALF in Lewis rats. This information should be considered in attempts to develop new therapeutic approaches to the treatment of ALF.

Experience with molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in 20 children listed for high-urgency liver transplantation

For more than 10 years, children at our national center for pediatric liver transplantation (LT) have been treated with Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) liver dialysis as a bridging therapy to high-urgency LT. Treatment was reserved for 20 patients with the highest degrees of hepatic encephalopathy (HE; median grade = 3.5). Death from neurological sequelae was considered imminent for these patients, and this was further reflected in significantly higher international normalized ratios and ammonia levels and worse prognostic liver indices (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores and liver injury units) in comparison with 32 wait-listed patients who did not receive MARS dialysis. MARS therapy was generally well tolerated, with a reduction in thrombocytes and hemorrhaging as the most common side effects. HE improvement was documented in 30% of the treated patients, but progression to grade IV encephalopathy occurred in 45% of the patients despite the treatment. Serum ammonia, bilirubin, bile acid, and creatinine levels significantly decreased during treatment. Eighty percent of MARS-treated patients survived to undergo LT, and their survival was equivalent to that of non-MARS-treated patients with severe liver failure (69%, P = 0.52). The heterogeneity between MARS-treated patients and non-MARS-treated patients in our cohort precluded a statistical evaluation of a benefit from MARS for patient survival. Our data demonstrate the safety of MARS even in the most severely ill patients awaiting LT, but strategies that promote the more rapid and widespread availability of high-quality donor organs remain of critical importance for improving patient survival in cases of severe acute liver failure.

Two-year outcomes in initial survivors with acute liver failure: results from a prospective, multicentre study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The long-term clinical outcomes in initial survivors with acute liver failure (ALF) are not well known. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the 2-year clinical outcomes among initial survivors and liver transplant (LT) recipients that were alive 3 weeks after enrolment in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG).

METHODS

Outcomes in adult ALFSG patients that were enrolled between 1998 and 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Two-year patient survival was significantly higher in the 262 LT recipients (92.4%) compared to the 306 acetaminophen (APAP) spontaneous survivors (SS) (89.5%) and 200 non-APAP SS (75.5%) (P < 0.0001). The causes of death were similar in the three groups but the time to death was significantly longer in the LT recipients (P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of 2-year mortality in the APAP group were a high serum phosphate level and patient age (c-statistic = 0.65 (0.54, 0.76)), patient age and days from jaundice to ALF onset in the non-APAP group (c-statistic = 0.69 (0.60, 0.78)), and patient age, days from jaundice, and higher coma grade in the LT recipients (c-statistic = 0.74 (0.61, 0.87)). The LT recipients were significantly more likely to be employed and have a higher educational level (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year outcomes in initial survivors of ALF are generally good but non-APAP patients have a significantly lower survival which may relate to pre-existing medical comorbidities. Spontaneous survivors with APAP overdose experience substantial morbidity during follow-up from ongoing psychiatric and substance abuse issues.

Outcomes of living versus deceased donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in the United States

Clinical outcomes for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States remain to be determined. To address this gap in knowledge, we examined post-liver transplantation outcomes of adults with ALF undergoing LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in the United States. We analyzed Organ and Procurement and Transplantation Network data for adults with ALF who were listed for liver transplantation as status 1 or 1A and who underwent LDLT (N = 21) or DDLT (N = 2316) between October 1987 and April 2011. We found no strong evidence that the survival probabilities for adults with ALF who underwent LDLT were inferior to those who underwent DDLT (P = .764). In adults with ALF who underwent LDLT, 1- and 5-year survival probabilities were both 71%; for DDLT these probabilities were 79% and 71%, respectively. In adults with ALF, 1- and 5-year liver graft survival probabilities, respectively, were 62% and 57% for LDLT, and 74% and 66% for DDLT. In these series of adults with ALF who were listed as status 1 or 1A, patient and graft survival rates for LDLT were similar to those for DDLT. Our findings suggest that if deceased donor livers are unavailable, LDLT is an acceptable option in experienced centers for adults with ALF.

Liver transplantation in acute-on-chronic liver failure: lessons learnt from acute liver failure setting

Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a clinical entity with high risk of mortality. These patients can have severe liver dysfunction complicated with multiple organ failure. Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for these patients. Literature regarding management of acute liver failure with special emphasis on liver transplantation was reviewed. Lessons learnt from the management of patients with acute liver failure which could be extrapolated to the management of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure are discussed. Significant improvement in outcomes of acute liver failure has been reported across the world. Several aspects in transplantation for acute liver failure were found to be relevant to the management of acute-on-chronic liver failure. These include defining criteria to identify patients needing early liver transplantation, prioritizing patients with acute liver failure on the waiting list, defining when to abandon transplantation in acute liver failure, emphasis on graft quality and the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to manage multiple organ dysfunction. Useful lessons can be learnt from the progress made in the management of acute liver failure and these can be extrapolated to the management of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.