Primary liver cancer and survival in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hemochromatosis

Modern Outcomes Following Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hereditary Hemochromatosis: A Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complication of the common genetic condition hereditary hemochromatosis (HH). It is unknown whether HH as an etiology of liver disease impacts the outcome. We compared the results of liver transplantation (LT), surgical resection and locoregional therapies in a matched cohort study and investigated whether HH as an etiology has an impact on survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with HH and HCC (2000 to 2015) were compared with age, sex and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage-matched non-HH HCC cases. Patients were offered curative or noncurative treatment according to BCLC stage and Milan criteria. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients (52 HH; total cohort median age: 67 [44 to 78] y, 97% male, Model for End-stage Liver Disease: 9 [5 to 31]) were studied with a median follow-up of 22 (3 to 126) months. Of the HH cases, the median serum ferritin at diagnosis of HCC was 326 (27 to 5718) μg/L and α-fetoprotein 33 (2 to 197,926) kIU/L. Five-year survival for HH patients receiving curative therapy was 77% (80% for LT, 67% for resection/radiofrequency ablation), and 15% (23% for transarterial chemoembolization) for those undergoing noncurative therapy. Survival for HH patients compared with controls was similar (hazard ratio=0.949; P=0.839). On multivariate Cox regression survival analysis, BCLC stage, and diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (but not HH diagnosis) were independently associated with reduced survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HCC and HH can achieve comparable survival rates following curative or LRT modalities to other liver diseases. The BCLC staging system accurately stratifies survival and excellent 5-year survival is possible following LT in selected patients.

The oncolytic efficacy and safety of avian reovirus and its dynamic distribution in infected mice

Primary liver cancer is a major public health challenge that ranks as the third most common cause of cancer worldwide despite therapeutic improvement. Reovirus has been emerging as a potential anti-cancer agent and is undergoing multiple clinical trials, and it is reported that reovirus can preferentially cause the cell death of a variety of cancers in a manner of apoptosis. As few studies have reported the efficacy of oncolytic activity and safety profile of avian reovirus, in our study, LDH assay, MTT assay, DAPI staining, and flow cytometry assay were performed to demonstrate the oncolytic effects of avian reovirus against the HepG2 cells, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and animal experiments were conducted to investigate the dynamic distribution of avian reovirus in infected mice and then illustrate the safety and tissue tropism of avian reovirus. LDH assay, DAPI staining, and flow cytometry assay confirmed the efficacy of the oncotherapeutic effects of avian reovirus, and MTT assay has indicated that avian reovirus suppressed the proliferation of HepG2 cells and decreased their viability significantly. qRT-PCR revealed the dynamic distribution of avian reovirus in infected mice that avian reovirus might replicate better and have more powerful oncolytic activity in liver, kidney, and spleen tissues. Furthermore, histopathological examination clearly supported that avian reovirus appeared non-pathogenic to the normal host, so our study may provide the new insights and rationale for the new strategy of removing liver cancer.

Impact statement

We demonstrated the efficacy of oncolytic activity of avian reovirus (ARV) by LDH assay, MTT assay, DAPI staining, and flow cytometry assay, and also investigated the dynamic distribution of ARV in infected mice and then illustrated the safety and tissue tropism of ARV by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and animal experiments. Collectively, our study may provide the new insights and rationale for the new strategy of removing liver cancer.

Assessing the Non-tumorous Liver: Implications for Patient Management and Surgical Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic resection is performed for various benign and malignant liver tumors. Over the last several decades, there have been improvements in the surgical technique and postoperative care of patients undergoing liver surgery. Despite this, liver failure following an extended hepatic resection remains a critical potential postoperative complication. Patients with underlying parenchymal liver diseases are at particular risk of liver failure due to impaired liver regeneration with an associated mortality risk as high as 60 to 90%. In addition, live donor liver transplantation requires a thorough presurgical assessment of the donor liver to minimize the risk of postoperative complications.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Recently, cross-sectional imaging assessment of diffuse liver diseases has gained momentum due to its ability to provide both anatomical and functional assessments of normal and abnormal tissues. Various imaging techniques are being employed to assess diffuse liver diseases including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US). MRI has the ability to detect abnormal intracellular and molecular processes and tissue architecture. CT has a high spatial resolution, while US provides real-time imaging, is inexpensive, and readily available. We herein review current state-of-the-art techniques to assess the underlying non-tumorous liver. Specifically, we summarize current approaches to evaluating diffuse liver diseases including fatty liver alcoholic or non-alcoholic (NAFLD, AFLD), hepatic fibrosis (HF), and iron deposition (ID) with a focus on advanced imaging techniques for non-invasive assessment along with their implications for patient management. In addition, the role of and techniques to assess hepatic volume in hepatic surgery are discussed.

Heart and heart-liver transplantation in patients with hemochromatosis

BACKGROUND

Hemochromatosis predisposes to dilated or restrictive cardiomyopathy which can progress to end-stage heart failure, requiring the use of advanced heart therapies including heart (HT) and heart liver (HLT) transplantation. Little is known about the characteristics and outcomes of these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry for all patients listed for HT or HLT for a diagnosis of 'hemochromatosis' between 1987 and 2014. Waitlist and post-transplantation outcomes were compared between patients with hemochromatosis (HT vs HLT) and other etiologies. Of the 81,356 adults listed for heart transplantation, 23 patients with hemochromatosis were identified (16 listed for HLT; and 7 listed for HT). Compared with other etiologies, HC patients were younger (39 vs 51years, p<0.0001), and more likely to need inotropes (56.5% vs 25.6%, p=0.003) and mechanical ventilation (13% vs 3.4%, p=0.041). Cumulative hazards of waitlist mortality or delisting were higher in hemochromatosis patients than for other etiologies of heart failure (p<0.001). There were 4 HT and 4 HLT during the study period. Post-transplantation, patients with HC had a 1- and 2-year cumulative survival of 88% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HT and HLT are viable options for patients with hemochromatosis. Patients with hemochromatosis are younger with increased wait-list mortality compared with other etiologies.

Haemochromatosis

Haemochromatosis is now known to be an iron-storage disease with genetic heterogeneity but with a final common metabolic pathway resulting in inappropriately low production of the hormone hepcidin. This leads to increase in intestinal absorption and deposition of excessive amounts of iron in parenchymal cells which in turn results in eventual tissue damage and organ failure. A clinical enigma has been the variable clinical expression with some patients presenting with hepatic cirrhosis at a young age and others almost asymptomatic for life. Research is unravelling this puzzle by identifying environmental factors-especially alcohol consumption-and associated modifying genes that modulate phenotypic expression. A high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis but this can lead to presymptomatic therapy and a normal life expectancy. Venesection (phlebotomy) therapy remains the mainstay of therapy, but alternative therapies are the subject of current research.

Liver transplantation normalizes serum hepcidin level and cures iron metabolism alterations in HFE hemochromatosis

Defects in human hemochromatosis protein (HFE) cause iron overload due to reduced hepatic hepcidin secretion. Liver transplantation (LT) is a key treatment for potential complications from HFE-related hereditary hemochromatosis (HH). This study evaluated hepcidin secretion and iron burden after LT to elucidate HH pathophysiology. Patients (n=18) homozygous for the p.Cys282Tyr mutation in the HFE gene underwent LT between 1999 and 2008. Serum iron, serum hepcidin, and hepatic iron concentrations were determined before LT and at the end of follow-up (median 57 months). Mortality and causes of death were determined. Survival was compared to that of the overall patient population that received LT. Before LT, serum hepcidin levels were low (0.54 ± 2.5 nmol/L; normal range: 4-30 nmol/L). After LT, 11 patients had iron evaluations; none received iron depletion therapy; all had normal transferrin saturation. The mean serum ferritin was 185 (± 99) μg/L. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that iron overload was absent in nine patients, mild in one patient with metabolic syndrome, and high (180 μmol/g) in one patient with hereditary spherocytosis discovered after LT. At the end of follow-up, serum hepcidin was normal in 10 patients (11.12 ± 7.6 nmol/L; P<0.05) and low in one patient with iron deficiency anemia. Survival was 83% and 67% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Survival was similar for patients with HH and patients that received LT for other causes.

CONCLUSION

In HH, LT normalized hepcidin secretion and prevented recurrence of hepatic iron overload. Survival was similar to that of patients who received LTs for other liver diseases.

Monogenic diseases that can be cured by liver transplantation

While the prevalence of most diseases caused by single-gene mutations is low and defines them as rare conditions, all together, monogenic diseases account for approximately 10 in every 1000 births according to the World Health Organisation. Orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) could offer a therapeutic option in monogenic diseases in two ways: by substituting for an injured liver or by supplying a tissue that can replace a mutant protein. In this respect, LT may be regarded as the correction of a disease at the level of the dysfunctional protein. Monogenic diseases that involve the liver represent a heterogeneous group of disorders. In conditions associated with predominant liver parenchymal damage (i.e., genetic cholestatic disorders, Wilson's disease, hereditary hemochromatosis, tyrosinemia, α1 antitrypsin deficiency), hepatic complications are the major source of morbidity and LT not only replaces a dysfunctional liver but also corrects the genetic defect and effectively cures the disease. A second group includes liver-based genetic disorders characterised by an architecturally near-normal liver (urea cycle disorders, Crigler-Najjar syndrome, familial amyloid polyneuropathy, primary hyperoxaluria type 1, atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome-1). In these defects, extrahepatic complications are the main source of morbidity and mortality while liver function is relatively preserved. Combined transplantation of other organs may be required, and other surgical techniques, such as domino and auxiliary liver transplantation, have been attempted. In a third group of monogenic diseases, the underlying genetic defect is expressed at a systemic level and liver involvement is just one of the clinical manifestations. In these conditions, LT might only be partially curative since the abnormal phenotype is maintained by extrahepatic synthesis of the toxic metabolites (i.e., methylmalonic acidemia, propionic acidemia). This review focuses on principles of diagnosis, management and LT results in both paediatric and adult populations of selected liver-based monogenic diseases, which represent examples of different transplantation strategies, driven by the understanding of the expression of the underlying genetic defect.

Diagnosis and treatment of hereditary hemochromatosis: an update

Hereditary hemochromatosis is an inherited iron overload disorder caused by inappropriately low hepcidin secretion leading to increased duodenal absorption of dietary iron, most commonly in C282Y homozygous individuals. This can result in elevated serum ferritin, iron deposition in various organs and ultimately end-organ damage, although there is incomplete biochemical and clinical penetrance and variable phenotypic expression of the HFE mutation in hereditary hemochromatosis. An elevated SF >1000 mg/l [corrected] is associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and mortality in C282Y homozygotes.Conversely, a SF <1000 µg/l is associated with a very low likelihood of cirrhosis, making liver biopsy unnecessary among C282Y homozygotes in the absence of concomitant risk factors for liver disease. Phlebotomy remains the mainstay of treatment and new treatments being studied include erythrocytapheresis and 'mini-hepcidins'. Iron overload is being recognized to play a carcinogenic role in hepatocellular carcinoma and other cancers, possibly supporting iron depletion in these patients.

Review article: the iron overload syndromes

BACKGROUND

Iron overload syndromes encompass a wide range of hereditary and acquired conditions. Major developments in the field of genetics and the discovery of hepcidin as a central regulator of iron homeostasis have greatly increased our understanding of the pathophysiology of iron overload syndromes.

AIM

To review advances in iron regulation and iron overload syndrome with special emphasis on hereditary haemochromatosis, the prototype iron overload syndrome.

METHODS

A PubMed search using words such as 'iron overload', 'hemochromatosis', 'HFE', 'Non-HFE', 'secondary iron overload' was undertaken.

RESULTS

Iron overload is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Sensitive diagnostic tests and effective therapy are widely available and can prevent complications associated with iron accumulation in end- organs. Therapeutic phlebotomy remains the cornerstone of therapy for removal of excess body iron, but novel therapeutic agents including oral iron chelators have been developed for iron overload associated with anaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Iron overload disorders are common. Inexpensive screening tests as well as confirmatory diagnostic tests are widely available. Increased awareness of the causes and importance of early diagnosis and knowledge of the appropriate use of genetic testing are encouraged. The availability of novel treatments should increase therapeutic options for patients with iron overload disorders.

Iron overload in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major causative agent of chronic liver disease worldwide, but the actual mechanisms responsible for liver injury remain unclear. NAFLD includes a spectrum of clinical entities ranging from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with possible evolution to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Iron is considered a putative element that interacts with oxygen radicals in inducing liver damage/fibrosis and insulin resistance. The role of hepatic iron in the progression of NASH remains controversial, but in some patients, iron may have a role in the pathogenesis of NASH. Though genetic factors, insulin resistance, dysregulation of iron-regulatory molecules, erythrophagocytosis by Kupffer cells may be responsible for hepatic iron accumulation in NASH, exact mechanisms involved in iron overload remain to be clarified. Iron reduction therapy such as phlebotomy or iron-restricted diet may be promising in patients with NAFLD/NASH to reduce hepatic injury as well as insulin resistance. Larger controlled trials of longer duration are warranted to assess the long-term clinical benefit of phlebotomy and/or iron-restricted diet in NAFLD/NASH.

Insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of cancer from inborn errors of metabolism

Mutations in genes that play fundamental roles in metabolic pathways have been found to also play a role in tumor development and susceptibility to cancer. At the same time, significant progress has been made in the treatment of patients with inborn errors of metabolism (IEM),(1) resulting in increased longevity and the unmasking of cancer predisposition, frequently hepatocellular carcinoma, in these conditions. These patients offer a potential opportunity to deepen our understanding of how intermediary metabolism impacts tumorigenesis. We provide an overview from the perspective of cancers in patients affected with IEM and discuss how dysregulation of these specific metabolic pathways might contribute to the mechanisms of cancer development and treatment.

Insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of cancer from inborn errors of metabolism

Mutations in genes that play fundamental roles in metabolic pathways have been found to also play a role in tumor development and susceptibility to cancer. At the same time, significant progress has been made in the treatment of patients with inborn errors of metabolism (IEM),(1) resulting in increased longevity and the unmasking of cancer predisposition, frequently hepatocellular carcinoma, in these conditions. These patients offer a potential opportunity to deepen our understanding of how intermediary metabolism impacts tumorigenesis. We provide an overview from the perspective of cancers in patients affected with IEM and discuss how dysregulation of these specific metabolic pathways might contribute to the mechanisms of cancer development and treatment.

Inherited hepatocellular carcinoma

Inherited liver disorders that cause chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and cirrhosis can lead to the development of liver cancer. Because of the rarity and diversity of some of these syndromes, the relative risk of developing HCC in these patients and the age at which tumours typically arise cannot be accurately estimated. Among patients with hereditary hemachromatosis (HH), the annual incidence of HCC is 4% once cirrhosis has been established. Fibrosis and portal hypertension associated with HH can be partially reversed with therapeutic phlebotomy, but it is unclear whether this treatment alters the incidence of HCC in these patients. Importantly, it seems likely that coincidence of these genetic disorders with known HCC risk factors such as alcoholism and viral hepatitis would amplify their oncogenic potential. For this reason, patients with known genetic disorders of the liver should be repeatedly counselled to avoid environmental and toxic injury to the liver. Treatment of HCC in patients with inherited liver disease mirrors that of HCC associated with other etiologies. Unfortunately, there are case series which suggest these patients with inherited liver disease and HCC tend to present at more advanced stages and are therefore not eligible for curative therapies, causing overall decreased survival relative to patients with HCC of viral or other etiologies.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the second commonest indication for liver transplantation after viral hepatitis in the United States and Europe. Controversies surround the indications and allocation of scarce and expensive resource for this so called self inflicted disease. Controversies stem from the apprehension that alcoholic recipients are likely to relapse and cause damage to the graft. There is a need to select those candidates with lower risk for relapse with the available predictive factors and scores. Substance abuse specialist and psychiatrists are mandatory in the pre-transplant evaluation and in the post-transplant follow-up. There is conflicting evidence to support a fixed period of pretransplant abstinence, although most units do follow this. Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) continues to be a contraindication for transplantation, however there is a need for further research in this field as a subset of patients with AH who do not respond to medical treatment, have high early mortality and could benefit from transplantation. One year, 3-year, and 5-year survival post-transplant is similar for both ALD and non-ALD recipients. The incidence of post-transplant rejection and retransplantation is also similar to other recipients. ALD with viral hepatitis especially hepatitis C virus leads to a more aggressive liver disease with early presentation for transplantation. ALD patients are more prone to develop de-novo malignancy; this is attributed to the long term effect of alcohol, tobacco combined with immunosuppression. Post-transplant surveillance is important to detect early relapse to alcoholism, presence of de-novo malignancy and treat the same adequately.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common and deadly malignancy that is increasing in incidence in developed countries. The emergence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for about half of this increase in HCC, although the etiology of HCC in 15%-50% of new HCC cases remains unclear. The most common form of chronic liver disease in developed countries is nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which encompasses a broad spectrum of histopathology. The prevalence of NAFLD, including the more aggressive nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is increasing with the growing epidemics of diabetes and obesity. NASH can progress to cirrhosis and its related complications. Growing evidence suggests that NASH accounts for a large proportion of idiopathic or cryptogenic cirrhosis, which is associated with the typical risk factors for NASH. HCC is a rare, although important complication of NAFLD. Diabetes and obesity have been established as independent risk factors for the development of HCC. New evidence also suggests that hepatic iron deposition increases the risk of HCC in NASH-derived cirrhosis. Multiple case reports and case reviews of HCC in the setting of NASH support the associations of diabetes and obesity with the risk of HCC, as well as suggest age and advanced fibrosis as significant risks. Insulin resistance and its subsequent inflammatory cascade that is associated with the development of NASH appear to play a significant role in the carcinogenesis of HCC. The complications of NASH, including cirrhosis and HCC, are expected to increase with the growing epidemic of diabetes and obesity.

Outcome of liver transplantation in hereditary hemochromatosis

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is a genetic disorder of iron metabolism. It is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation (LT). It has been suggested that patients who undergo LT for cirrhosis related to HH have higher morbidity and mortality from cardiac, infectious and malignant complications. The purpose of this retrospective review was to determine whether these observations hold true in the current era. We analysed the data of 22 patients who had LT for HH from 1996 to 2007 at our center. Thirteen patients had LT for complications of end-stage liver disease, seven for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and two for subacute liver failure. Cofactors promoting liver disease were identified in 15 patients. Ten patients had iron reduction with venesection before transplantation. Patient and graft survival at 1 and 5 years were 80.7%, and 74% respectively. There were seven deaths after a median follow up of 46 months either because of multiorgan failure, or caused by HCC recurrence. Bacterial infections were the commonest cause of morbidity. Patients with HH remain at a higher risk of developing HCC. Infectious complications are common. Iron reduction with preoperative venesection reduces the risk of cardiac and infection complications postoperatively. Improved survival post-LT reflects changes in selection, disease modification through venesection, and improvement in immunosuppression.

Liver iron excess in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma developed on non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Liver iron deposits are frequent in patients with non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis (NAFLD), but their role is not well defined. To investigate the effect of liver iron excess on the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis.

METHODS

Hepatic iron was measured retrospectively with a semiquantitative method in liver biopsies of 153 patients with NASH-related cirrhosis: 51 with HCC and 102 controls without HCC, matched for age, sex and stage of liver disease. The corrected total iron score (0-60) was the sum of three scores: the hepatocytic iron score (0-36), sinusoidal iron score (0-12), and portal iron score (0-12), multiplied by 3/3, 2/3, or 1/3 depending on the localisation of the iron in the nodules.

RESULTS

Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that iron deposits (corrected total iron score>0) were more frequent in HCC patients than in controls. The median corrected total iron score was significantly higher in HCC patients than in controls. The liver iron overload was sinusoidal.

CONCLUSIONS

Iron deposition in the liver was more frequent in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis with HCC than in HCC-free controls. Liver iron overload may be associated with development of HCC in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis.

Current state of combined heart-liver transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) has been increasingly performed in the USA, but published data on overall patient and graft outcomes have been limited.

METHODS

This study aimed to review the indications, immunosuppression, complications and outcomes of CHLT in the USA. From October 1987 to December 2005, a total of 47 cases of combined heart-liver (n = 41) and heart-liver-kidney transplantation (n = 6) were reported to the United Network for Sharing (UNOS) database. One pediatric case was excluded from the analysis. The mean age of recipients was 46 years (range, 22 to 65 years) and included 31 (67%) men and 16 (33%) women.

RESULTS

The most common indication for both heart and liver transplantation was amyloidosis (30%). Patients were followed for a mean duration of 1,362 days or 3.7 years (range, 1 to 4,598 days or 0 to 12.6 years). Patient, heart and liver graft survival rates were 84.8%, 84.8% and 82.4% at 1 year, and 75.6%, 75.6% and 73.5% at 5 years, respectively. At the latest follow-up of patients who survived at least 6 months after transplantation (n = 39), 28.2% of patients were on a single immunosuppressive agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined heart-liver transplantation is a viable option for candidates who require the combined transplantation, with outcomes comparable to those of single-organ recipients.

Liver iron, HFE gene mutations, and hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The influence of HFE gene mutations and liver iron overload on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence in patients with cirrhosis is subjected to controversial results. The aim of this work was to clarify this influence in a large cohort of prospectively followed-up cirrhotic patients classified according to the cause of their liver disease.

METHODS

Three hundred one consecutive cirrhotic patients (162 alcoholics and 139 HCV-infected patients) were included at time of diagnosis of cirrhosis and followed-up. Liver iron overload on initial biopsy according to modified Deugnier's score and C282Y/H63D HFE gene mutations were assessed.

RESULTS

In patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (mean iron score, 2.0 +/- 3.0; mean time of follow-up, 66.1 +/- 45.1 months), 40 (24.6%) developed HCC. Thirteen (8.02%) were heterozygotes for C282Y HFE gene mutation and had higher hepatic iron scores (3.6 +/- 3.8 vs 1.9 +/- 2.8, respectively, P = .05). In univariate analysis, liver iron overload as a continuous variable (HR, 1.23 [1.13-1.34], P < .001) or in binary coding with an optimal threshold of iron score >/=2.0 (HR, 4.1 [2.1-7.3], P < .0001) and C282Y mutation carriage (HR, 2.7 [1.2-6.3], P = .01) were risk factors for HCC. In multivariate analysis, liver iron and C282Y mutation carriage remained independent risk factors for HCC. In patients with HCV-related cirrhosis (C282Y mutation carriage, 17 [12.23%]; mean liver iron score, 0.9 +/- 1.9; mean time of follow-up, 85.5 +/- 42.1 months; HCC, 63 [45.32%] patients), C282Y mutation carriage and liver iron were not associated with HCC occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver iron overload and C282Y mutation are associated with a higher risk of HCC in patients with alcoholic but not HCV-related cirrhosis.

Survival of liver transplant recipients with hemochromatosis in the United States

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Earlier studies have suggested that patients with hemochromatosis have poor post-transplantation survival. We aimed to compare patients with hemochromatosis to those with other causes of liver disease with regard to post-transplantation survival.

METHODS

We compared the post-transplant survival of patients with and without hemochromatosis using data provided by the United Network for Organ Sharing on 50,306 adult, cadaveric liver transplantations performed in the United States between January 1, 1990, and July 18, 2006.

RESULTS

During 1990-1996, the post-transplantation survival of patients with hemochromatosis (n = 177) at 1 year (79.1%), 3 years (71.8%), and 5 years (64.6%) was lower than the average 1-year (86.4%), 3-year (79.5%), and 5-year (73.8%) survival of all other transplant recipients (hazard ratio for death, 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.71). In contrast, during 1997-2006, patients with hemochromatosis (n = 217) had excellent 1-year (86.1%), 3-year (80.8%), and 5-year (77.3%) post-transplantation survival, which was not different from the 1-year (88.4%), 3-year (80.3%), and 5-year (74.0%) post-transplantation survival of all other transplant recipients (hazard ratio for death, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65-1.22). Adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics did not substantially change these results. Compared with recipients without hemochromatosis, those with hemochromatosis were more likely to die of cardiovascular diseases and less likely to die as a result of graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-transplantation survival of patients with hemochromatosis, which was previously reported to be poor, has been excellent in the United States during the past 10 years.

Liver transplantation for metabolic liver diseases

Liver transplantation has become an accepted treatment for several metabolic liver diseases. With advances in organ transplantation and immunosuppressive strategies, survival rates following liver transplantation are generally excellent. When the primary metabolic defect is hepatic in origin, liver transplantation not only replaces the dysfunctional organ but also cures the underlying metabolic defect. For conditions in which the primary metabolic defect is extrahepatic, liver transplantation is usually performed for hepatic complications, although disease recurrence may occur. This article reviews common metabolic liver diseases treated with liver transplantation in the adult population.

Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Arising in Hereditary Hemochromatosis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a well-known complication of hereditary hemochromatosis. The benefit of surgical therapy in this clinical entity is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of such patients both in our own experience as well as in the published literature.

METHODS

320 patients with a diagnosis of HCC were evaluated at our institution to undergo either surgical resection (n = 262) or liver transplantation (n = 58) during the 4- year period from January 2001 to December 2004. We identified 5 patients with HCC arising in the setting of hemochromatosis. A literature search was performed to estimate resectability rates as well as outcomes after liver transplantation for HCC arising in hemochromatosis.

RESULTS

HCC was multifocal in 4 instances and solitary in 1 case. The liver was cirrhotic in all but 1 case. Three patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy, 1 an exploratory laparoscopy, and 1 underwent transplantation. HCC was unresectable in all cases. The patient with a solitary tumor and cirrhosis underwent 5 sessions of transarterial chemoembolization and is alive 37 months after surgical exploration. The 3 patients with multifocal tumors who underwent exploratory laparotomies died within 6 months after the intervention. The fifth patient who underwent a deceased donor split liver transplantation for multifocal tumor is alive without recurrence 3 years after transplantation. These results are similar to those in the literature that concur with the low resectability rate and the favorable outcome after liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Resectability rates of HCCs arising in hemochromatosis are extremely low, given that tumors are usually multifocal and the livers cirrhotic in the majority of the instances. Early detection of hemochromatosis as well as intensive tumor screening of cirrhotic patients with hemochromatosis could possibly optimize the role of surgery or accelerate the decision to proceed with liver transplantation.

Prognostic factors and survival in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis and cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

The survival of treated, noncirrhotic patients with hereditary hemochromatosis is similar to that of the general population. Less is known about the outcome of cirrhotic hereditary hemochromatosis patients. The present study evaluated the survival of patients with hereditary hemochromatosis and cirrhosis.

METHODS

From an established hereditary hemochromatosis database, all cirrhotic patients diagnosed from January 1972 to August 2004 were identified. Factors associated with survival were determined using univariate and multivariate regression. Survival differences were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were identified. Sixty patients had genetic testing, 52 patients (87%) were C282Y homozygotes. Median follow-up was 9.2 years (range 0 to 30 years). Nineteen patients (20%) developed hepatocellular carcinoma, one of whom was still living following transplantation. Cumulative survival for all patients was 88% at one year, 69% at five years and 56% at 20 years. Factors associated with death on multivariate analysis included advanced Child-Pugh score and hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were older at the time of diagnosis of cirrhosis (mean age 61 and 54.6 years, respectively; P=0.03). The mean age at the time of diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was 70 years (range 48 to 79 years). No other differences were found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hereditary hemochromatosis and cirrhosis are at significant risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma. These patients are older when diagnosed with carcinoma and may have poorer survival following transplantation than patients with other causes of liver disease. Early diagnosis and treatment of hereditary hemochromatosis by preventing the development of cirrhosis may reduce the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the future.

Survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatic iron overload: the national hemochromatosis transplant registry

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Previous uncontrolled studies have suggested that patients with hepatic iron overload have a poor outcome after liver transplantation. We examined the effect of HFE mutations on posttransplantation survival in patients with hepatic iron overload.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatic iron overload were enrolled from 12 liver transplantation centers. Hepatic iron concentration (HIC), hepatic iron index (HII), HFE mutation status, and survival after liver transplantation were recorded.

RESULTS

HFE-associated hemochromatosis (HH) defined as homozygosity for the C282Y (n = 14, 7.2%) mutation or compound heterozygosity for the C282Y/H63D (n = 11, 5.6%) mutation was identified in 12.8% of patients. Survival postliver transplantation was significantly lower among patients with HH (1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 64%, 48%, 34%, respectively) compared with simple heterozygotes (C282Y/wt or H63D/wt) or wild-type patients. Patients with HH had a hazard ratio for death of 2.6 (P = .002) after adjustment for age, United Network for Organ Sharing status, year of transplantation, and either elevated HII or HIC. Non-HH patients with hepatic iron overload also had significantly decreased survival when compared with the overall population undergoing liver transplantation (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.15-1.61, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

One- and 5-year survivals after liver transplantation are significantly lower among patients with HFE-associated HH. Our data also suggest that hepatic iron overload may be associated with decreased survival after liver transplantation, even in patients without HH. Early diagnosis of hepatic iron overload using HFE gene testing and iron depletion prior to liver transplantation may improve posttransplantation survival, particularly among patients with HH.

Liver biopsy: evolving role in the new millennium

Since the origination of the liver biopsy, the technique has evolved into an essential diagnostic tool, with very few complications. In addition to the percutaneous approach, a liver biopsy can also be obtained via transjugular, laparoscopic, or intraoperative approach. While in the early 1960s and 1970s the liver biopsy was used for making a diagnosis in cases of clinically suspected medical liver disease, today it is more often performed to assess disease prognosis and evaluate therapeutic strategies. As a result, indications for the liver biopsy have evolved over the past 2 decades. However with advances in serologic diagnosis of viral/autoimmune hepatitis and laboratory tests for genetic disorders, the role of liver biopsy in certain clinical settings is currently debated. This review discusses the technique, indications, contraindications, and the changing role of liver biopsy in some of the common disorders and the associated controversies.

Hepatic iron overload in alcoholic end-stage liver disease is associated with iron deposition in other organs in the absence of HFE-1 hemochromatosis

BACKGROUND

End-stage cirrhosis in the absence of hereditary hemochromatosis (HHC) can be associated with moderate to marked hepatic iron overload, especially in liver disease as a result of alcohol and/or hepatitis C. However, no published studies have addressed extrahepatic iron deposition in this setting.

METHOD

A retrospective case series from three autopsied patients who died from end-stage cirrhosis associated with significant hepatic iron overload. Histology of vital organs was performed to detect extrahepatic iron deposition. HFE genotyping for the C282Y and H63D mutations was determined from archival tissue. Hepatic iron index and hepatic iron concentration (HIC) were quantified from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Medical records were reviewed for possible causes of iron overload.

RESULTS

Two patients were H63D heterozygous (H63D +/-) and one was wild type (C282Y -/-, H63D -/-). Histology revealed evidence of stainable iron in the heart and pancreas of all three subjects. Additionally, stainable iron was seen in the stomach in one subject and in the thyroid, pituitary, choroid plexus and testes in another subject. HIC ranged from 4354 to 6834 microg/g dry weight and HII from 1.8 to 2.2 (micromol/g/years).

CONCLUSION

Iron overload secondary to end-stage liver disease can be associated with iron deposition in other organs in the absence of HFE-1 HHC.

Relation of hemochromatosis with hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology, screening, treatment, and prevention

HH is a common inherited disorder of iron metabolism affecting about 1 out of 250 individuals of Northern European decent. Many of these patients do not have evident phenotypic expression and do not develop significant iron loading. Some patients, however, develop progressive iron overload and cirrhosis. These individuals are at risk of developing HCC. Cirrhotics with hemochromatosis should undergo regular screening for HCC. If HCC is identified early, treatment with either resection or liver transplantation is optimal. Palliative measures, including ablative therapy and chemoembolization, can be used. With increasing clinical recognition,hemochromatosis should be diagnosed earlier and progression to cirrhosis and HCC should be minimized.

Hemochromatosis

Hemochromatosis is a common genetic disease with a wide range of clinical expression: from no symptoms to cirrhosis of the liver. The discovery of the gene has led to a genetic blood test useful in the diagnosis of hemochromatosis. Treatment by phlebotomy is simple and efficient and can prevent the development of cirrhosis, leading to a normal life expectancy.

Iron, hemochromatosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is associated with an increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The risk previously had been estimated to be as high as 200-fold increased. Recent studies suggest that the risk for HCC in HFE -associated HH may be much lower and occurs predominantly in patients with cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis. The risk for HCC also is increased among patients with African iron overload and possibly in other iron-loading disorders such as homozygous beta thalassemia. The greatly increased iron stores in the liver observed in these disorders can stimulate carcinogenesis via both direct and indirect pathways. The prevalence of HCC also appears to be higher among patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation. It is not clear whether mildly to moderately increased hepatic iron stores or HFE mutations are associated independently with an increased risk for HCC among patients with other types of liver disease. In this article, the incidence and prevalence of HCC in patients with HH and other liver diseases associated with iron overload are discussed as well as the possible mechanisms for the increased risk for hepatic carcinogenesis in these disorders.

Patient and graft survival after liver transplantation for hereditary hemochromatosis: Implications for pathogenesis

The clinical outcome of patients who have undergone liver transplantation for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) or who have received iron-loaded donor grafts is unclear. We reviewed 3,600 adult primary orthotopic liver transplants and assessed the outcomes in 22 patients with HH. We also evaluated graft function and iron mobilization in 12 recipients of iron-loaded donor grafts. All 22 subjects who received liver transplants for HH were male; 13 had other risk factors for liver disease. HH patients had comparatively poor outcomes following transplantation: survival at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplantation were 72%, 62%, and 55%, respectively. Recurrent hepatocellular cancer was the most common cause of death. There was no convincing evidence of reaccumulation of iron in the grafted liver in HH; however, 1 subject demonstrated increased serum ferritin concentration and grade 2 hepatic siderosis. Liver iron stores were slow to mobilize in 7 of the 12 recipients of iron-loaded grafts. These recipients had appropriate early graft function, but 2 patients with heavy iron loading and increased hepatic iron developed hepatic fibrosis. In conclusion, (1) HH is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation, and the majority of patients requiring transplantation had other risk factors for chronic liver disease; (2) reaccumulation of liver iron in HH patients is very unusual, but increased iron stores may be slow to mobilize in normal recipients of iron-loaded grafts, potentially compromising late graft function; (3) post-liver transplant survival is reduced in HH, and affected patients require careful clinical evaluation of perioperative and postoperative risk factors. Our data suggest that iron excess in HH does not wholly depend on intestinal iron absorption but is also influenced by liver factors that moderate iron metabolism.

Hereditary haemochromatosis

Hereditary haemochromatosis is a very common genetic defect in the Caucasian population, with an autosomal recessive inheritance. It is characterized by inappropriately increased iron absorption from the duodenum and upper intestine, with consequent deposition in various parenchymal organs, notably the liver, pancreas, joints, heart, pituitary gland and skin, with resultant end-organ damage. Clinical features may be non-specific and include lethargy and malaise, or reflect target organ damage and present with abnormal liver tests, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, arthropathy, cardiomyopathy, skin pigmentation and gonadal failure. Early recognition and treatment (phlebotomy) is essential to prevent irreversible complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The history of this condition dates as far back as 1865, but in the last decade great advances have been made. We discuss the genetics, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management of a condition that could easily present to a generalist, and is an important diagnosis not to miss.

Effect of alcohol on iron storage diseases of the liver

The consumption of excess alcohol in patients with liver iron storage diseases, in particular the iron-overload disease hereditary haemochromatosis (HH), has important clinical consequences. HH, a common genetic disorder amongst people of European descent, results in a slow, progressive accumulation of excess hepatic iron. If left untreated, the condition may lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis and primary hepatocellular carcinoma. The consumption of excess alcohol remains an important cause of hepatic cirrhosis and alcohol consumption itself may lead to altered iron homeostasis. Both alcohol and iron independently have been shown to result in increased oxidative stress causing lipid peroxidation and tissue damage. Therefore, the added effects of both toxins may exacerbate the pathogenesis of disease and impose an increased risk of cirrhosis. This review discusses the concomitant effects of alcohol and iron on the pathogenesis of liver disease. We also discuss the implications of co-existent alcohol and iron in end-stage liver disease.

Association between hemochromatosis (HFE) gene mutation carrier status and the risk of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Iron is a pro-oxidant that may promote carcinogenesis. Mutations in the hemochromatosis (HFE) gene are associated with increased total body iron stores in some individuals. We assessed the risk of colon cancer among individuals with and without HFE gene mutations.

METHODS

We performed a population-based, case-control study in North Carolina. Case patients with colon cancer and control subjects provided information on multiple environmental exposures, including total iron intake and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. They also provided a venous blood sample, from which DNA was extracted, amplified, and subjected to diagnostic restriction enzyme mapping to detect two major HFE gene mutations, C282Y and H63D. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Thirteen hundred and eight subjects participated (475 case patients, 833 control subjects). The allele frequencies of the H63D and C282Y mutations were greater among case patients (0.11 and 0.046, respectively) than among control subjects (0.09 and 0.044, respectively; P =.14 and P =.85, respectively). When we controlled for age, race, sex, red meat consumption, NSAID use, and total iron intake, subjects with any HFE gene mutation were more likely to have colon cancer than subjects with no HFE gene mutations (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 to 1.87). The magnitude of the effect was similar for both the H63D (adjusted OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.98) and C282Y mutations (adjusted OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.88 to 2.19). The risk of colon cancer associated with an HFE gene mutation was similar for those who did and did not have a family history of colon cancer. Among those with HFE mutations, cancer risk increased with increasing age and total iron intake.

CONCLUSIONS

HFE gene mutations are associated with an increased risk of colon cancer. Cancer risk is greatest in mutation carriers who are older or consume high quantities of iron.

Hereditary hemochromatosis: perspectives of public health, medical genetics, and primary care

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HHC) is a condition characterized by excess iron in body tissues, resulting in complications such as cirrhosis, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, and arthritis. These complications usually manifest during adulthood. Two methods of screening for the detection of early stage of HHC are available: serum iron measures and molecular testing to detect mutations in the gene. These phenotypic and genotypic screening tests are of particular interest because a simple treatment-periodic phlebotomy-can be used to prevent iron accumulation and clinical complications. HHC might represent the first adult-onset genetic disorder for which universal population-based screening would be appropriate. Therefore, HHC has been proposed as a paradigm for the introduction of adult genetic diseases into clinical and public health practice. However, universal screening for HHC has not been recommended because of the uncertainty about the natural history of the iron overload or HHC and, in particular, uncertainty about the prevalence of asymptomatic iron overload and the likelihood that it will progress to clinical complications. If universal screening is not appropriate based on current data, what other measures might reduce the disease burden of iron overload? New studies provide more systematic information about the penetrance of the C282Y mutation and shed further light on the natural history of the disorder. The authors review these data and consider their implications for public health, medical genetics, and primary care.

Review article: haemochromatosis

Hereditary haemochromatosis is the prototype disease for primary iron overload. The disorder is very common, especially amongst subjects of Northern European extraction. It is characterized by an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance, and most cases are homozygous for the C282Y mutation in the HFE gene. Haemochromatosis is now recognized to be a complex genetic disease with probable significant environmental and genetic modifying factors. The early diagnosis of individuals at risk for the development of haemochromatosis is important, because survival and morbidity are improved if phlebotomy therapy is instituted before the development of cirrhosis. The cost-effectiveness and utility of large-scale screening for haemochromatosis have been questioned given that many individuals with the homozygous C282Y mutation do not have iron overload or end-organ damage. However, the use of phenotypic tests, such as serum transferrin-iron saturation, for initial screening avoids the problem of the identification of non-expressing homozygotes. Liver biopsy remains important in management to determine the presence or absence of cirrhosis, particularly amongst patients with serum ferritin levels greater than 1000 ng/mL or elevated liver enzymes. Those with non-HFE haemochromatosis who cannot be identified on genotypic testing should have a liver biopsy to establish diagnosis. Patients with end-stage liver disease may develop liver failure or primary liver cancer, and liver transplantation may be required. Liver transplantation for haemochromatosis is associated with a poorer outcome compared with other indications because of infections and cardiac complications.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: predisposing conditions and precursor lesions

The global incidence of HCC is rising; in the United States, its rise is in parallel to that of cirrhosis due to the HCV and obesity epidemics. The lack of adequate treatment for advanced HCC mandates both prevention and early detection of these lesions. The limitations of currently available histopathologic evaluations, serologic markers, and radiographic imaging modalities in detecting HCC and its precursors have been outlined in this review. Refinements of all of these may lead to better HCC detection, earlier intervention, and successful treatment. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the most efficacious and cost-effective approach to screening.

Liver allograft iron accumulation in patients with and without pretransplantation hepatic hemosiderosis

There is a paucity of data regarding hepatic allograft iron accumulation in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in whom severe iron overload was present in the native explanted liver. Our aim is to evaluate the frequency and cellular distribution of stainable iron in early and late post-OLT hepatic allograft biopsy specimens from patients undergoing their first OLT who had excess iron in their native explanted liver. We compared iron-staining patterns in hepatic allograft biopsy specimens at approximately 1 month (early) and 1 to 2 years (late) post OLT in 41 patients with hepatic iron indices greater than 1.9 in the explanted liver (cases) with a selected group of matched controls without explant hemosiderosis. Our cases included 6 patients with a pre-OLT diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis and 35 patients with cirrhosis and secondary iron overload. Early iron deposition was mild in most cases, commonly affected Kupffer's cells, and was seen with similar frequency in cases and controls (41% v 27%; P =.29). Stainable iron was observed in 20 donor livers (12 cases, 8 controls), and all 20 subjects showed stainable iron in 1-month hepatic allograft biopsy specimens. Liver samples from 35 matched pairs were studied for late iron deposition. Iron deposition was observed in 43% of cases versus 17% of controls (P =.06). In conclusion, the frequency of stainable iron in early hepatic allograft biopsy specimens was not different between patients with versus without pre-OLT hepatic hemosiderosis. There was a suggestion that patients with severe pre-OLT hemosiderosis had a greater frequency of iron accumulation in late hepatic biopsy specimens.

Liver transplantation of patients in end-stage cirrhosis

The success of liver transplantation has resulted in its widespread use for end-stage liver disease; 1- and 5-year survival rates of 70-90% and 60-80% respectively have been reported. Indications for assessment for liver transplantation are now evidence-based and early referral is recommended, correlating with improved patient survival. The management of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation is designed to prevent complications of liver disease and to avoid therapeutic misadventures. Following transplantation, rejection and infection dominate post-operative complications, and improvements in their prevention and treatment have also correlated with improved patient survival. The development and introduction into clinical practice of a variety of immunosuppressive agents has offered a bewildering array of therapeutic options but with a lack of evidence on which to select optimal immunosuppression. Similarly, difficulties remain in the treatment of some of the complications arising from liver transplantation such as recurrence of disease and complications of immunosuppression.

Increased hepatic iron and cirrhosis: no evidence for an adverse effect on patient outcome following liver transplantation

It has been suggested that preexisting severe hepatic iron overload may adversely affect outcome after liver transplantation. The pathogenesis of iron overload in cirrhosis in the absence of hemochromatosis gene (HFE) mutations is poorly understood. The relationships between liver disease severity and etiology, degree of hepatic iron overload, and post-liver transplantation outcome were studied in 282 consecutive adult patients with cirrhosis. Thirty-seven percent of patients had stainable hepatic iron. Increased hepatic iron concentration was significantly associated with more severe liver disease (P<.001), male sex (P = .05), the presence of spur cell anemia (P<.0001), and hepatocellular liver disease (P<.0001). The HFE mutations were uncommon in patients with increased hepatic iron stores. Increased hepatic iron concentration was not associated with greater utilization of resources or a lower survival after liver transplantation. Child-Pugh score at the time of liver transplantation was the only independent variable affecting patient survival (P = .0008). In summary, our data suggest that the severity of the liver disease rather than hepatic iron concentration is the most important determinant of outcome after liver transplantation and that, in general, increasing hepatic iron concentration in cirrhosis is a surrogate marker of the severity of the underlying liver disease.

Hepatology in the new millennium. Advances in viral hepatitis, hepatic disorders, and liver transplantation

The 1990s have been an exciting time for the field of hepatology. There has been a rapid expansion of knowledge, and new discoveries have revolutionized the field. It is now possible to characterize and treat many more liver diseases. Newer medications in the form of interferon alfa and nucleoside analogues have been added to the armamentarium for treatment of chronic viral hepatitis. Liver transplantation has been established as an effective therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease.

Genetic liver disease in adults. Early recognition of the three most common causes

The most common clinically important genetic diseases leading to liver dysfunction in adults are Wilson's disease, HHC, and alpha 1AT deficiency. Advances in molecular biology have led to the identification and characterization of the genetic defects in these conditions. Consequently, genetic testing for disease-causing mutations is now available for most of these disorders. However, it is important to understand the strengths and limitations of such testing. Genetic testing is probably most helpful in HHC because of the high frequency of the homozygous C282Y mutation among patients of northern European descent and the relatively high penetrance of the mutation with regard to clinical expression. Genetic testing is much less helpful in the other genetic liver diseases because of the high number of possible mutations and variable clinical expression. However, noninvasive phenotype-based screening tests and specific treatments are available for most genetic liver diseases. Appropriate use of screening tests in routine clinical practice can assist in early identification of genetic liver diseases and prevent development of end-organ damage.

Iron overload in cirrhosis-HFE genotypes and outcome after liver transplantation

Previously, we found appreciable hepatic iron deposition in one third of our patients undergoing liver transplantation (LTx) with approximately 10% of cases having quantifiable iron in the range of that seen in hereditary hemochromatosis (HHC). The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcome in liver transplant patients with and without iron overload. We also sought to determine the prevalence of HFE mutations in liver transplant patients with iron overload. Of 456 consecutive liver transplants, 41 explants had an hepatic iron index (HII) greater than 1.9, and these cases were compared to 41 matched liver transplant recipients without increased hepatic iron. Posttransplantation complications, along with patient and graft survival were monitored. HFE gene testing was performed using DNA-based techniques. Kaplan-Meier 5-year patient survival after LTx was significantly lower in cases with hepatic iron overload compared to matched controls without iron excess (48% vs. 77%; P =.045). Fatal infections (especially fungal) were more common in patients with iron overload (24% vs. 7%; P =.03). Of the 41 patients with a liver explant HII greater than 1.9, only 4 were C282Y homozygotes. Patients with severe hepatic explant iron overload undergoing LTx have a reduced survival compared to liver transplant recipients without explant iron excess. The reduced survival was attributable mainly to fatal bacterial and fungal infections. Despite the iron overload, HFE gene mutations were uncommon in patients with hepatic explant hemosiderosis.

Liver transplantation. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Liver transplantation has revolutionized the care of patients with end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation is indicated for acute or chronic liver failure from any cause. Because there are no randomized controlled trials of liver transplantation versus no therapy, the efficacy of this surgery is best assessed by carefully comparing postoperative survival with the known natural history of the disease in question. The best examples of this are in primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, for which well-validated disease-specific models of natural history are available. There are currently relatively few absolute contraindications to liver transplantation. These include severe cardiopulmonary disease, uncontrolled systemic infection, extrahepatic malignancy, severe psychiatric or neurological disorders, and absence of a viable splanchnic venous inflow system. One of the most frequently encountered contraindications to transplantation is ongoing destructive behavior caused by drug and alcohol addiction. The timing of the surgery can have a profound impact on the mortality and morbidity of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Because of the long waiting lists for donor organs, the need to project far in advance when transplantation might be required has proven to be one of the greatest challenges to those treating patients with end-stage liver disease. Three important questions must be addressed in a patient being considered for liver transplantation: (1) when should the patient be referred for possible transplantation? (2) when should the patient be listed for transplantation? and (3) when is the patient too sick to have a reasonable chance of surviving the perioperative period?