Famciclovir treatment of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: a pilot study

Inhibitory Effect of Penciclovir-Triphosphate on Duck Hepatitis B Virus Reverse Transcription

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by penciclovir-triphosphate, the active metabolite of famciclovir. A recently developed in vitro translation assay for the expression of an enzymatically active duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) reverse transcriptase was used to assess the inhibitory activity of penciclovir-triphosphate (PCV-TP) in comparison with other guanosine analogue triphosphates. Acyclovir-triphosphate (ACV-TP), the chiral triphosphates of penciclovir (PCV), ( R)-PCV-TP and ( S)-PCV-TP, and carbocyclic 2′-deoxyguanosine-TP (CDG-TP) did inhibit reproducibly minus strand DNA synthesis to different extents. CDG-TP was the most potent inhibitor of dGTP incorporation. The inhibitory effect of these compounds against the incorporation of the first nucleotide of minus strand DNA, dGMP, was similar to that observed with DNA chain elongation. 2′,3′-dideoxyguanosine-TP (ddG-TP), ACV-TP and both ( R) and ( S)-PCV-TP inhibited the incorporation of the next nucleotides in the short DNA primer, whereas CDG-TP did not. These results demonstrate that PCV-TP inhibits hepadnavirus reverse transcription by inhibiting the synthesis of the short DNA primer. The data obtained with the inhibition of the enzymatic activity of the DHBV polymerase provides a new insight into the mechanism of action of penciclovir-triphosphate on HBV replication.

Current prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

Prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are essential for patients with HBV-related disease. Before LT, lamivudine (LAM) was proposed to be down-graded from first- to second-line therapy. In contrast, adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) has been approved not only as first-line therapy but also as rescue therapy for patients with LAM resistance. Furthermore, combination of ADV and LAM may result in lower risk of ADV resistance than ADV monotherapy. Other new drugs such as entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir, are probably candidates for the treatment of hepatitis-B-surface-antigen-positive patients awaiting LT. After LT, low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), in combination with LAM, has been regarded as the most cost-effective regimen for the prevention of post-transplant HBV recurrence in recipients without pretransplant LAM resistance and rapidly accepted in many transplant centers. With the introduction of new antiviral drugs, new hepatitis B vaccine and its new adjuvants, post-transplant HBIG-free therapeutic regimens with new oral antiviral drug combinations or active HBV vaccination combined with adjuvants will be promising, particularly in those patients with low risk of HBV recurrence.

Antiviral therapy and resistance with hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis world wide. Recently, however, there has been quite dramatic improvement in the understanding of HBV associated liver disease and its treatment. It has become clear that high viral replication is a major risk factor for the development of both cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Early studies have shown lamivudine lowers the risk of HBV associated complications. There are currently three nucleos(t)ides licensed, in addition to interferon, and there are more drugs coming to the market soon. Interferon or its pegylated counterpart are still the only options for treatment with defined end points, while nucleos(t)ides therapy is used mostly for long term treatment. Combination therapies have not been shown to be superior to monotherapy in naïve patients, however, the outcome depends on how the end point is defined. Interferon plus lamivudine achieves a higher viral suppression than either treatment alone, even though Hbe-seroconversion was not different after a one year treatment. HBV-genotypes emerge as relevant factors, with genotypes "A" and "B" responding relatively well to interferon, achieving up to 20% HBsAg clearance in the case of genotype "A". In addition to having a defined treatment duration, interferon has the advantage of lacking resistance selection, which is a major drawback for lamivudine and the other nucleos(t)ides. The emergence of resistance against adefovir and entecavir is somewhat slower in naïve compared to lamivudine resistant patients. Adefovir has a low resistance profile with 3%, 9%, 18%, and 28% after 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, while entecavir has rarely produced resistance in naïve patients for up to 3 years.

Improved outcome of chronic hepatitis B after heart transplantation by long-term antiviral therapy

Chronic hepatitis B progresses to cirrhosis in the majority of immunosuppressed patients. The outcome of long-term antiviral therapy in HBV-infected organ transplant recipients is unknown. In 1996, we included 20 heart transplant (HT) recipients in a pilot trial to treat chronic hepatitis B with famciclovir. At that time, bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis was evident in 15 individuals (75%). From 1998 onwards, patients were switched to lamivudine in case of primary or secondary virological nonresponse to famciclovir. Adefovir or tenofovir became available at our centre for HT recipients in 2002. After 103 months, one patient was still on famciclovir showing a complete virological response. Sixteen patients were switched to lamivudine after 0.5-4 years of famciclovir therapy. Six of those showed a long-term response to lamivudine therapy lasting for up to 7 years. Lamivudine resistance developed in the remaining 10 patients (63%), in 4 of them successful rescue therapy (adefovir n = 3, tenofovir n = 1) could be initiated. Only one hepatocellular carcinoma developed, which was successfully treated by locoregional ablative therapy. Nine patients died (45%), with lamivudine-resistance-related liver failure as the cause of death in five cases. Significant improvement of Ishak fibrosis scores could be demonstrated in six of the seven patients with more than two sequential liver biopsies available. Long-term antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B can lead to regression of liver cirrhosis in patients after organ transplantation, unless viral resistance occurs. This study demonstrates the urgent need for further antivirals to overcome antiviral resistance.

[Viral hepatitides infections in transplant recipients]

Hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV) -related end-stage liver disease are the most common indications for liver transplantation (LTx) in our area. Recurrent HCV infection is universal after LTx and although histological recurrence is variable, the rate of disease progression is more rapid than in non-immunosuppressed patients and this impact graft and patient survival. All anti-HCV treatment strategies have shown limited efficacy so, at the present time, HCV reinfection after LTx represents the most important clinical problem in the follow-up. Regarding HBV, the most important factor in viral recurrence in the allograft is the presence of active viral replication at the time of LTx. The best patient selection (in non-replicative phase), the indefinite use of hyperimmune anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin and the use of the new antiviral drugs have made possible a significant improvement in graft and patient survival.

Liver transplantation for HBV and management of reinfection

Follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) represents the most common indolent lymphoma with a median survival of 10 years. A new prognostic index (FLIPI) provides prognostic information at diagnosis and at relapse. Initial treatments combining monoclonal antibody therapy using rituximab with chemotherapy appear to increase the response rate and decrease the risk of relapse with little increase in toxicity. Promising phase III trial results demonstrating improvements in outcome using rituximab have recently been reported. A number of phase II trials have also demonstrated encouraging activity combining radiolabeled antibodies in sequence with chemotherapy. The role of high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation is becoming more defined, with improvements in progression-free survival observed in the upfront and relapsed setting. The application of allogeneic transplantation, once restricted to young otherwise healthy patients has shown encouraging activity in older, relapsed, and refractory patients using nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens. These new treatment options make the management of newly diagnosed patients both exciting and a challenge.

Review article: Nucleoside analogues for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Current accepted treatment for chronic hepatitis B uses either the immunomodulator interferon alpha or nucleoside analogues lamivudine or adefovir. Interferon has side effects which mean it is often poorly tolerated. Long-term use of lamivudine is associated with increasing viral resistance for each year it is taken and the rebound viraemia that can occur when the drug is stopped is also of concern to many. Adefovir appears to have less of the resistance issues of lamivudine but is still a relatively new drug and at present its use is principally limited to patients with lamivudine-resistant disease. A number of other nucleoside analogues are currently being developed with some now at the stage of early clinical trials. A proportion share the significant resistance problems of lamivudine but many appear to have more potent anti-viral effect than the drugs currently available. If some of these newer anti-viral agents are approved for use in chronic hepatitis B, the potential for prolonged suppression of hepatitis B virus replication with resultant stabilization or improvement in liver disease may be achieved.

Effects of long-term lamivudine therapy in renal-transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Following renal transplantation (RT), chronic immunosuppression is associated in hepatitis B virus (HBV) (+) patients with a flare-up of the disease, which might be harmful in the long term.

OBJECTIVES

We report on the effect of long-term lamivudine therapy given at an initial daily dose of 100mg in 18 HBV (+) RT patients.

RESULTS

When lamivudine therapy was commenced, 14 patients (77%) had an increase in their aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) aminotransferase levels. During a mean follow-up, under treatment, of 36.5 +/- 3.5 months (up to 66 months), 10 patients (55%) had a sustained partial (HBV DNA < 4 x 10(5)copies/ml) (n = 4) or complete (HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml) (n = 6) virological response. Overall, 12 virological breakthroughs were observed. Of those who were HBe Ag(+) prior to lamivudine therapy (n = 4), one seroconverted to HBe Ab during therapy. At the last follow-up, AST and ALT levels were normal in 13 patients. When liver biopsy was repeated during treatment (n = 15), the virological responders showed a significant decrease in total Knodell score from 10 +/- 0.6 to 7 +/- 1 (P = 0.04), but no significant change in the stage of fibrosis. Conversely, in those patients with high HBV DNA titers, there were no significant changes in the total Knodell score or in the grade of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, lamivudine therapy is safe in HBV(+)ve renal-transplant patients. However, even if the full and partial virological response rates are still high (55%) in the long term, relapse or primary non-responses occur. The implementation of alternative efficient strategies is warranted.

Sequential combination therapy of HBe antigen-negative/virus-DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B with famciclovir or lamivudine and interferon-alpha-2a

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis B e antigen-negative/hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHBe-) exhibits a high relapse rate on monotherapy with lamivudine or interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha). We investigated, whether sequential therapy with famciclovir or lamivudine followed by combination with IFN-alpha-2a improves durable virologic response in CHBe- characterized by mutation analysis of the HBV precore genome region.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were treated with famciclovir (n=3) or lamivudine for 4 weeks to reduce the viral load, and subsequently with the combination of the nucleoside analogue and IFN-alpha-2a until 16 weeks beyond the loss of serum HBV-DNA.

RESULTS

Median duration of therapy was 29.0 weeks (range 20.6-48.3 weeks). Serum HBV-DNA was undetectable and alanine aminotransferase had normalized in all patients at the end of treatment. Seven (50%) patients maintained a sustained response 12 months after end of treatment. Only two of them had been infected by HBV with the G1896A mutation. Most patients (5/7) with the G1896A mutation relapsed within 4 months after therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sequential combination therapy can induce sustained virologic response in a subgroup of CHBe-, but most with the G1896A precore mutant HBV relapse. Trials of CHBe- should be based on characterization of HBV mutants.

Prevention of and treatment for hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation in the nucleoside analogues era

Post-transplant prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has significantly reduced hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rates, but it is rather ineffective in patients with pretransplant viremia. Moreover, long-term HBIG administration is very expensive and may be associated with emergence of escape HBV mutants. Lamivudine has been widely used in the management of HBV transplant patients. Pretransplant lamivudine lowers HBV viremia, decreasing the risk of post-transplant HBV recurrence, but to try and minimize development of resistant HBV strains, it should start within the last 6 months of the anticipated transplantation timing. Preemptive post-transplant lamivudine monotherapy is associated with progressively increasing HBV recurrence rates, but combined therapy with lamivudine and HBIG at relatively low dosage is currently the most effective approach in this setting, even in HBV-DNA-positive patients, who also receive lamivudine in the pretransplant period. The most frequent therapy for post-transplant HBV recurrence is lamivudine, but the increasing resistance rates represent a rather challenging problem. Adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir are currently the most promising agents for lamivudine-resistant HBV strains. All these advances in anti-HBV therapy have made HBV liver disease an indication for liver transplantation irrespective of viral replication status, a complete turn around from 10 years ago.

Successful treatment of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis using adefovir dipivoxil in a patient with cirrhosis and renal insufficiency

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis is a deleterious manifestation of hepatitis B virus infection in immunocompromised patients. Without treatment, this condition is usually fatal within weeks of onset. Liver retransplantation has not been successfully performed to date, and treatment intervention was generally unsuccessful before the advent of adefovir dipivoxil. However, concerns have been expressed about the use of this agent in patients who are renally compromised. A 40-year-old liver transplant recipient with hepatitis B virus reinfection, resistance to lamivudine, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis complicated by terminal renal impairment and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was treated with adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg after every dialysis. Since initiating treatment with adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg, a dramatic virologic and clinical improvement was observed in this patient. The patient returned to work full-time within 6 months of starting adefovir dipivoxil without the need for liver retransplantation. Serum HBV DNA (Amplicor HBV; Roche Diagnostics, Basle, Switzerland) decreased by 6 log(10) copies/mL and became negative (< 400 copies/mL) within 8 weeks of treatment and remains negative at the last available assessment. The patient continues to require renal dialysis, but is generally well. Creatinine clearance improved from 8 mL/min to 16 mL/min during the course of treatment. No adverse events related to adefovir dipivoxil were observed. Adefovir dipivoxil resulted in significant clinical improvement in this patient with hepatitis B virus-induced fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, despite the presence of renal impairment and lamivudine resistance.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis B infection in liver transplant recipients

1. Therapeutic decisions are guided by a patient's clinical status (severity of disease and presence of comorbidities) and previous drug-exposure history. 2. Lamivudine is safe and effective in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection caused by wild-type virus or failure of hepatitis B immunoglobulin therapy. Lamivudine resistance, developing in approximately 25% after 12 months of therapy, is its main limitation. 3. Famciclovir is safe in liver transplant recipients; however, virological and clinical responses are less consistent than with lamivudine. Thus, lamivudine is favored over famciclovir as first-line therapy in transplant recipients with no previous exposure to nucleoside analogues. 4. Although limited in availability, adefovir dipivoxil appears safe and effective in treating liver transplant recipients with lamivudine-resistant HBV disease. Close monitoring of renal function is recommended, with dose adjustment in patients with reduced creatinine clearances. 5. Limited data suggest that intravenous ganciclovir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and interferon alfa may be useful as rescue therapies for patients with lamivudine- or famciclovir-resistant HBV disease. 6. Antiviral therapy with two or more suitable agents may minimize the chance for viral resistance; therefore, future therapeutic strategies likely will use combination therapy in the long-term management of recurrent HBV disease.

Hepatitis B: progress in the last 15 years

1. Patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B without effective prophylaxis have a high risk for recurrent infection and severe graft damage, leading to death or re-OLT. 2. Long-term prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) significantly reduces the risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence and increases survival. Patients with detectable HBV DNA at the time of OLT have a high risk for recurrence despite HBIg prophylaxis. 3. Lamivudine (LAM) therapy for patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis before OLT results in inhibition of viral replication and clinical improvement. Its efficacy is limited by the frequent emergence of LAM-resistant YMDD mutations. The ideal length of therapy with LAM pre-OLT has not yet been defined. 4. Prophylaxis of HBV recurrence with LAM monotherapy is not recommended because of the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen after OLT in approximately 50% of patients. 5. LAM is the best available treatment for patients with established recurrent hepatitis B. Long-term therapy is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant mutants in up to 60% of patients. Severe hepatitis and liver failure have been described among liver transplant recipients with YMDD mutations. 6. Combination therapy with HBIg and LAM prevents HBV recurrence in 90% to 100% of patients who undergo OLT for hepatitis B. The optimal HBIg protocol in the LAM era is yet to be defined. 7. Preliminary studies suggest that adefovir dipivoxil inhibits HBV replication in patients infected with LAM-resistant HBV strains. 8. Fifteen years ago, hepatitis B was regarded as a relative or absolute contraindication for OLT. Today, hepatitis B is a universally accepted indication for OLT.

Chronic hepatitis B: current and future treatment options

Hepatitis B, a major viral infection that can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, is the ninth most common cause of death worldwide. Prevention of hepatitis B virus transmission is key to reducing the spread of this serious condition. Management of chronic hepatitis B requires significant knowledge of approved pharmacotherapeutic agents and their limitations. Today, agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this infection are interferon-alpha-2b and lamivudine. Newer agents are being developed and hold promise: adefovir, famciclovir, ganciclovir, lobucavir, entecavir, emtricitabine, L-deoxythymidine, clevudine, a therapeutic vaccine, and thymosin alpha-1. Therapeutic options for managing hepatitis infection after liver transplantation are also evolving. These include hepatitis B immunoglobulin and nucleoside analogues.

Increasing applicability of liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B-related liver disease

Liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis B has been under discussion for 20 years because of inferior results without reinfection prophylaxis; therefore, we analyzed our overall experience with liver transplantation in hepatitis B patients with immunoprophylaxis, particularly the influence of the available antiviral treatment in different periods. From 1988 to 2000, 228 liver transplants in 206 hepatitis B patients were performed. Indications were acute liver failure (10%), hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis alone (67%) or with hepatitis D virus (HDV) (13%), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection (7%). All patients received long-term immunoprophylaxis (anti-HBs > 100 U/L). HBV DNA-positive patients were treated before and after surgery with famciclovir or lamivudine since 1993 and 1996, respectively. Since 1993, antivirals also were used for HBV reinfection. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 91%, 81%, and 73%. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (60% 5-year survival, P <.01) or HBV reinfection (69% 5-year survival, P <.01) survival was significantly impaired. Those with HDV or HCV coinfection had a slightly better survival than with HBV monoinfection (P >.05, not significant). Preoperative positive HBV DNA (hybridization-assay) test results were associated with a slightly impaired patient survival (78% 5-year survival, P >.05, not significant versus DNA-negative). Preoperative positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) predicted significantly worse survival (P <.05 versus negative HBeAg). Graft loss caused by reinfection was most frequent before the availability of antiviral drugs. Two-year patient survival increased from 85% in era I (1988-1993) to 94% in era III (1997-2000, P <.05). The 2-year recurrence rates in these 2 periods were 42% and 8% (P <.05). In conclusion, excellent long-term results can be achieved in hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation with modern strategies, and survival rates are similar to other indications. Based on our experience, hepatitis B patients, including those with active viral replication, should not be excluded from liver transplantation.

The cutaneous manifestations of viral hepatitis

Viral hepatitis is a common disease with significant morbidity and mortality that is found throughout the world. It is a known cause of acute and chronic liver disease. Because the disease can be asymptomatic in its acute stages, the diagnosis is often missed. This article reviews the extrahepatic manifestations of the disease, in particular the visible cutaneous lesions, which offer clues to the diagnosis of viral hepatitis. Familiarity with the most common skin lesions associated with each type of hepatitis virus will be useful in identifying previously undiagnosed individuals. This article serves as a review of the most widely published associations between skin diseases and specific subtypes of viral hepatitis.

Seroconversion after the addition of famciclovir therapy in a child with hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation who developed lamivudine resistance

There is very little information about hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in children after liver transplantation. This is the first report of the addition of famciclovir in a child who developed lamivudine resistance.A 5-year-old boy who was serum HBsAg-negative and was not vaccinated against HBV underwent living-related liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis A. The donor was his mother, who was serum HBcAb-positive. No immunoprophylaxis was administered. HBV infection developed after 18 months and was treated with 3 mg/kg daily of lamivudine. Serum alanine aminotransferase normalized and HBV DNA load decreased significantly. Sixteen months later, lamivudine resistance developed; a mutation (M552I) was confirmed by sequencing through the YMDD locus of the HBV polymerase gene. The addition of 750 mg daily of famciclovir led to seroconversion and the disappearance of serum HBV DNA. Lamivudine in combination with famciclovir might be a therapeutic option for HBV reinfection after liver transplantation, also in children. Suppression of viral replication to undetectable values is possible even in the lamivudine-resistant mutant.

Treatment of hepatitis B and C following liver transplantation

Advanced liver disease from hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) worldwide. Our understanding of recurrent liver disease related to HBV and HCV in the setting of OLT has evolved rapidly in the past decade. Recurrent viral hepatitis may lead to graft failure, death, or the need for retransplantation. Until about a decade ago, HBV was considered a contraindication to OLT due to its frequent recurrence and development of associated liver disease. Medical therapy with hepatitis B immune globulin and nucleoside analogues has diminished the risk of HBV recurrence and led to improvement in patient and graft survival. Consequently, OLT is now considered to be the standard of care in patients with end-stage liver disease related to HBV. HCV recurrence after OLT is almost universal. Although short-term survival in patients undergoing OLT for HCV is similar to survival for those transplanted for other indications, recurrent HCV may have an impact on long-term patient and graft survival. A specific and effective therapy has not been defined for recurrent HCV following transplantation, but the combination of interferon and ribavirin appears promising. Optimal strategies to eradicate these viruses or to slow disease progression are continually being investigated in light of the disparity between supply and demand in a diminishing organ pool for OLT candidates.

Occurrence and clinical outcome of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation

Lamivudine treatment of hepatitis B after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is often accompanied by fast viral-resistance formation. Although no clinical data are available, in vitro data indicate that lamivudine-resistant reinfection has a mild course because of defective viral replication. Between 1996 and 1999, a total of 34 patients were treated with lamivudine because of hepatitis B recurrence after OLT. All patients developed reinfection despite long-term passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin, diagnosed by positive hepatitis B surface antigen and positive hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA. Before treatment with lamivudine, 21 of these patients underwent a course of famciclovir and developed resistance. Monthly laboratory tests and sequential liver biopsies were performed during the follow-up period. Nineteen of 34 patients (56%) developed lamivudine resistance during the follow-up period of 12 to 49 months. One- and 3-year graft survival rates after the diagnosis of lamivudine resistance were 89% and 66%, respectively. In most cases, lamivudine resistance was associated with high viral replication (3,012 +/- 574 pg/mL 1 month after the diagnosis of lamivudine resistance); however, liver enzyme levels were only moderately elevated (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 45 +/- 16 U/L). Only 3 patients (15%) showed a rapid increase in ALT level to more than 500 U/L within 3 months after resistance developed. All other patients had mildly elevated liver enzyme levels during the first 6 to 8 months after lamivudine resistance. In the later course, liver enzyme levels increased in most patients. Fourteen patients with elevated transaminase levels were switched to lamivudine plus interferon alfa (n = 8) or lamivudine plus famciclovir therapy (n = 6). This combination was successful in most cases, decreasing HBV DNA and liver enzyme levels. Four patients with lamivudine resistance died during follow-up, only 1 patient because of HBV reinfection. In addition, 2 patients underwent retransplantation because of hepatitis B cirrhosis of the first graft. Compared with historic courses of wild-type recurrence, lamivudine-resistant reinfection is characterized by a milder clinical course. Fulminant cases were not observed; however, in three cases, chronic liver failure developed. The combination of different antivirals diminished viral replication after lamivudine resistance. In the future, new antiviral agents, such as adefovir, might further expand therapeutic options.

Lamivudine and low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin for prophylaxis of hepatitis B reinfection after liver transplantation possible role of mutations in the YMDD motif prior to transplantation as a risk factor for reinfection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Reinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with an unfavourable clinical course. Lamivudine/hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) combination treatment reduces reinfection rates. However, it is unclear at what time point lamivudine should be started and which HBIG doses are sufficient.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients receiving combination treatment were studied. Lamivudine was started up to 16.5 months before OLT and continued thereafter. HBIG was started intraoperatively and continued according to anti-HBs-titers. Median follow-up after OLT was 20 months.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received lamivudine pretreatment for >2 (median 6) months due to initial HBV-DNA-positivity (median 749 pg/ml). After initial lamivudine response HBV-DNA increased in two of them to concentrations above 10 pg/ml prior to OLT. Both had developed mutations in the YMDD motif and suffered from HBV reinfection 13 and 75 days postoperatively. Individual HBIG consumption was highly variable (range 787-4,766 lU/month). Twenty-two percent of anti-HBs titers measured before HBIG administration were below 100 IU/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined reinfection prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG is effective in patients with controlled viral replication at the time of OLT. However, pretransplantation lamivudine resistance is a risk factor for reinfection. Low dose HBIG maintenance therapy individualized according to anti-HBs-titers appears to be tenable.

Famciclovir treatment of hepatitis B infection following liver transplantation: a long-term, multi-centre study

Famciclovir is a novel guanosine nucleoside analogue with activity against herpes viruses and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Several preliminary reports have described efficacy of famciclovir in patients with recurrent hepatitis B after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This report describes the largest study to date of long-term famciclovir treatment in patients with de novo or recurrent hepatitis B post-OLT. One hundred thirty patients with detectable serum HBV DNA after OLT received oral famciclovir 500 mg tid on a compassionate-use basis. Safety analyses included all treated patients; efficacy was assessed in all patients and a subgroup of 73 patients with complete baseline HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) data who had received > or =6 months of treatment. Efficacy parameters included serum levels of HBV DNA, ALT, and anti-HBe or anti-HBs seroconversion rates. Of the 70 patients treated for > or =6 months who could be evaluated for response/non-response to famciclovir, 52 (74%) were responders, defined as patients who experienced a 70% decrease or more in HBV DNA levels from baseline, or who became HBV DNA-negative, for at least two consecutive visits. In famciclovir responders, HBV DNA levels decreased by a median of 91% after 12 weeks of treatment, 95% after 6 months and >99% after 18 months of treatment. Marked differentiation between responders and non-responders could be made soon after the onset of treatment. Among anti-HBe positive patients with evidence of HBV replication, 12/13 were responders. Patients with high baseline ALT levels experienced more rapid suppression of HBV DNA during therapy with famciclovir. Famciclovir therapy was safe and well tolerated; serious adverse events were reported infrequently. Famciclovir treatment may be beneficial in patients with hepatitis B infection post-OLT.

Famciclovir treatment in transplant recipients with HBV-related liver disease: disappointing results

OBJECTIVE

Long-term administration of hepatitis B immune globulin is effective as prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection but is limited by cost, side effects, availability and a failure rate of 20%. Famciclovir has been shown to be effective in the treatment of hepatitis B in the immunocompetent patient. Fewer data exist in the liver transplant setting, particularly regarding its efficacy in de novo HBV infection. The aims of this pilot study were to determine the effectiveness and safety of long-term administration of famciclovir in recurrent (n = 3) and de novo (n = 3) HBV infection after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Six patients with postransplant HBV infection (positivity of serum HBsAg and HBV DNA), four of whom were HBeAg positive, were treated with famciclovir (500 mg, 3 times a day) with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Biochemical, serological, virological (HBV DNA by hybridization assays and polymerase chain reaction), and histological (including HBV immunostaining) endpoints were evaluated.

RESULTS

None of the patients had a complete biochemical response, with a near complete normalization of ALT levels being observed in 3/6 patients. There was a lack of correlation between virological and biochemical responses. None of the patients seroconverted to anti-HBs or anti-HBe. A virological clearance was observed in only two patients, whereas a moderate reduction in HBV DNA levels was present in one. HBV DNA levels were higher than levels during pretreatment in the three remaining patients. Histological improvement was only observed in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Famciclovir alone appears of limited efficacy in the treatment of HBV infection after liver transplantation.

Comparison of famciclovir and lamivudine in the long-term treatment of hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Preliminary results of short-term famciclovir and lamivudine therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation revealed promising results. In a retrospective study the efficacy of long-term treatment with these substances was compared.

METHODS

A total of 53 HBV-infected adults (48 reinfections and 7 de novo infections) received antiviral treatment. A total of 32 of these patients were treated with famciclovir 3x500 mg, 20 of them were later switched to lamivudine. Fourteen patients received lamivudine, 150 mg/day orally, as first line therapy and 7 patients after failure of famciclovir-prophylaxis. Follow-up time was 8 to 62 months (mean 35 months). Response to therapy (HBV-DNA negative) was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Potential influence factors (HBV-DNA and HBeAg pretransplant, HDV coinfection, pretreatment with famciclovir and immunosuppression) on treatment response were analyzed by log. Rank test (univariate); then a multivariate analysis (Cox multiple stepwise regression model) was applied.

RESULTS

A total of 19 and 76% of the patients treated with famciclovir and lamivudine resp. became HBV-DNA negative; 0 and 24% HBsAg negative. Lamivudine was also effective as second line therapy. In a multivariate analysis of all 73 treatment courses, lamivudine treatment and HDV-coinfection were significant factors for better treatment response; regarding only the lamivudine group, negative HBeAg pretransplant was significant. Viral breakthrough after prolonged treatment occurred in 55% (lamivudine) to 80% (famciclovir) of treatment courses but was only accompanied by mild hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine and famciclovir are potent drugs for the treatment of HBV-infection after liver transplantation. The antiviral capacity of lamivudine is superior even after pretreatment with famciclovir but after prolonged treatment viral breakthrough is often observed.

Resistance of hepatitis B virus to antiviral drugs: current aspects and directions for future investigation

Despite the existence of vaccines, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major health problem worldwide. Interferon therapy successfully controls infection in only a small percentage of chronically infected individuals. The recent approval of the nucleoside analogue lamivudine for the treatment of chronic HBV infection has ushered in a new era of antiviral therapy. While lamivudine is highly effective at controlling viral infection short-term, prolonged therapy has been associated with an increasing incidence of viral resistance. Thus, it appears that lamivudine alone will not be sufficient to control chronic viral infection in the majority of individuals. In addition to lamivudine, several new nucleoside and nucleotide analogues that show promising antihepadnaviral activity are in various stages of development. Lamivudine resistance has been found to confer cross-resistance to some of these compounds and it is likely that resistance to newer antivirals may also develop during prolonged use. Drug resistance therefore poses a major threat to nucleoside analogue-based therapies for chronic HBV infection. Fortunately, combination chemotherapy (antiviral therapy with two or more agents) can minimize the chance that resistance will develop and can be expected to achieve sustained reductions in viral load, provided that suitable combinations of agents are chosen. Here we review the basis of drug resistance in HBV, with emphasis on aspects that are likely to affect drug choice in future.

Hepatitis B in transplantation

Hepatitis B has been a major challenge within the field of transplantation over the past few decades. Due to aggressive recurrence post-transplant, patients with hepatitis B have been excluded from the benefits of both solid organ and bone marrow transplants. Progress has been made, however, through an improved understanding of the biology of hepatitis B and the development of new antiviral strategies that can reliably suppress the virus. Patients with hepatitis B are now candidates for transplantation in an increasing number of circumstances. Careful pre-transplant evaluation is mandatory, together with a tailored antiviral regimen depending on the replicative status of the virus and the organ being transplanted. Minimizing steroid dose following transplantation is an important part of the strategy to reduce the risk of viral reactivation. Lamivudine has been an important development and it has assumed an increasing role in the management of these patients. As additional antivirals are developed, increasingly effective drug combinations will prevent viral recurrence as well as the emergence of drug-resistant mutants, which plagues the use of single agents. It is a rapidly evolving field and there is every reason for continued optimism.

Viral hepatitis. From prevention to antivirals

The challenge of viral hepatitis has been acknowledged and confronted in the last decade. Significant progress in prevention of infection with HAV and HBV may eradicate these serious infections from the United States and other parts of the world in the coming decades. Application of prophylactic strategies to children will be a major mechanism in accomplishing this task. The quest for potent antiviral medications continues. The next critically important development will be ways to prevent new HCV infections and to treat the millions of already infected individuals at risk for the serious consequences of this disease. For pediatricians, realizing these goals requires a greater understanding of perinatal HCV transmission, use of vaccines for prevention of viral hepatitis, and identification of HCV-infected children who are likely to benefit from new therapeutic strategies as they become available.

Hepatitis B

The hepatitis B virus is a hepatotropic virus that can produce a variety of clinical syndromes in patients ranging in age from infants to elderly adults. Worldwide, it is among the leading causes of fulminant hepatic failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recent advances have led to effective antiviral treatments using interferon and nucleoside analogues. Highly effective vaccinations also are used widely and ultimately may lead to eradication of this life-threatening virus.

End-stage liver disease and liver transplantation: role of lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a common cause of advanced liver disease, including end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation is generally regarded as the treatment of choice for decompensated cirrhosis. Although long-term prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) has improved significantly the outcome after transplantation, about 20-36% of transplant recipients still develop recurrent hepatitis B and have reduced survival. Moreover, HBIg prophylaxis has a number of disadvantages, including high cost, difficulty in administration and tolerability problems. Lamivudine, an oral nucleoside analogue, is a potent inhibitor of HBV replication and has been investigated in end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation. Treatment with lamivudine results in suppression of viral replication, and clinical improvement and stabilisation of some patients with end-stage liver disease, leading to increased pre-transplant survival as well as a reduced need for transplantation. Prophylaxis with lamivudine is also effective in preventing recurrent HBV infection and graft reinfection after transplantation, although a combination of lamivudine plus HBIg is preferable to prevent the emergence of YMDD variant HBV (tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate amino acid motif of HBV polymerase). Lamivudine is also effective for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis B after transplantation, based on improvement in virological parameters of infection as well as clinical and histological manifestations of disease. In all of these clinical settings, lamivudine is well tolerated and dose reduction is not required. In conclusion, lamivudine has a potential role for the treatment of patients with hepatitis B-related end-stage liver disease, for prophylaxis in patients undergoing liver transplantation, and in the treatment of recurrent or de novo HBV infection after transplantation.

Treatment of chronic woodchuck hepatitis virus infection in the Eastern woodchuck (Marmota monax) with nucleoside analogues is predictive of therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in humans

The woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) and its natural host, the Eastern woodchuck (Marmota monax), have been established as a model of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-induced disease. Several published studies have used this experimental animal model system to demonstrate potential antiviral therapies for chronic HBV infections. However, there has been little comparative information available on compounds used in clinical anti-HBV studies in WHV-infected woodchucks, thereby making interpretations of the potential relative effectiveness of new antiviral agents in humans more difficult. In this report, using a series of placebo-controlled studies, we compared the relative effectiveness of several nucleoside analogues that have been used in clinical trials for the treatment of chronic HBV infection against WHV replication in chronically infected woodchucks. Adenine-5'-arabinoside monophosphate (Ara-AMP [vidarabine]), ribavirin, (-)beta-L-2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine (3TC [lamivudine]), and famciclovir (oral prodrug of penciclovir) induced depressions in viremia and intrahepatic WHV-DNA replication that were consistent with their relative effectiveness in anti-HBV human clinical trials. As observed in HBV-infected patients, 3' azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT [zidovudine]) had no effect on WHV replication in these studies. These experimental results more firmly establish chronic WHV infection in woodchucks as an accurate and predictive model for antiviral therapies against chronic HBV infection in humans and provide a baseline for comparative antiviral effects of other experimental antiviral agents in the WHV/woodchuck model system.

Outcome of lamivudine resistant hepatitis B virus infection in the liver transplant recipient

BACKGROUND

In many transplant centres lamivudine is an important component of prophylaxis against, and treatment of, hepatitis B virus (HBV) graft infection. Drug resistant HBV species with specific polymerase mutations may emerge during lamivudine treatment.

AIMS

To examine the clinical consequences of graft infection by lamivudine resistant virus.

METHODS

The clinical course of four liver transplant patients who developed graft infection with lamivudine resistant virus was reviewed. The response of HBV infection to reduction of immunosuppression and to manipulation of antiviral therapy was assessed. For each patient, serum viral titre was measured and the viral polymerase gene was sequenced at multiple time points.

RESULTS

High serum titres were observed following emergence of the lamivudine resistant species. Wild type HBV re-emerged as the dominant serum species after lamivudine withdrawal. All patients developed liver failure, and onset of liver dysfunction was observed when resistant virus was the dominant serum species. In three patients, liver recovery was observed when immunosuppression was stopped and when alternative antivirals were given. Wild type virus appeared to respond to ganciclovir, and to reintroduction of lamivudine. For one patient, introduction of famciclovir was associated with clinical, virological, and histological response.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure of lamivudine prophylaxis may identify patients at special risk for the development of severe graft infection. Treatment of graft reinfection should include reduction of immunosuppression, and systematic exposure to alternative antivirals. Viral quantitation and genetic sequencing are essential components of therapeutic monitoring.

Lamivudine, adefovir and tenofovir exhibit long-lasting anti-hepatitis B virus activity in cell culture

In this work, we investigated the anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) activity of lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir, penciclovir and lobucavir after short-term (i.e. 24 or 48 h) or continuous (9 days) exposure of the HBV-containing cell line, HepG2 2.2.15, to these drugs. Lamivudine maintained significant anti-HBV activity when added for only 24 or 48 h to the cell cultures compared to when the drug was present for the whole period (9 days) on the cells, i.e. 50% effective concentration (EC50) values for the inhibition of HBV DNA synthesis were 0.07 +/- 0.02 microgram ml-1 after 24 h of incubation, 0.02 +/- 0.01 microgram ml(-1) after 48 h of incubation and 0.0016 +/- 0.001 microgram ml(-1) after 9 days of incubation. Similarly, the nucleoside phosphonate analogues, adefovir and tenofovir, retained significant anti-HBV activity when added for only a short period of time to the cells. The EC50 values were 12 +/- 1 microgram ml(-1) (24 h) and 1.0 +/- 0.2 microgram ml(-1) (48 h) vs 0.003 +/- 0.001 microgram ml(-1) (9 days) for adefovir, and 6.5 +/- 1.1 microgram ml(-1) (24 h) and 0.8 +/- 0.1 microgram ml(-1) (48 h) vs 0.03 +/- 0.02 microgram ml(-1) (9 days) for tenofovir. In contrast, penciclovir and lobucavir lost most of their anti-viral activity when present on the cells for 48 h or less.

Long-term results of famciclovir for recurrent or de novo hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Since the introduction of famciclovir in the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation, promising results have been published. In this study, the long-term efficacy and safety of famciclovir were assessed. Twenty-four patients with recurrent hepatitis B and 6 patients with de novo infection after liver transplantation were enrolled in an open prospective trial. Patients received oral famciclovir, 500 mg three times daily. Serum HBV-DNA, viral serology, and liver enzymes were measured sequentially; liver histology was taken before and during treatment in 12 patients. In the reinfected patients, 17 patients initially responded well to treatment, with a mean decrease of HBV-DNA of 82%, 5 patients became HBV-DNA negative. The drug was effective for 1-51 months (mean 16 months), then viral replication increased again in 13 out of 17 patients. One patient did not respond to treatment. Six out of 24 patients already had severe cirrhosis at the time of enrollment and died shortly afterwards, due to the HBV infection. The 6 patients with de novo infection all had a decline of HBV-DNA for 2-42 months (mean 14 months); 1 patient converted to HBV-DNA negative. Five out of 6 patients experienced a viral breakthrough later on. No severe side-effects were observed. Therefore, famciclovir is effective in certain HBV-infected patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but in the long term, most of the patients relapse.

Famciclovir treatment of chronic hepatitis B in heart transplant recipients: a prospective trial

Hepatitis B may take a rapid and aggressive course in patients under immunosuppression. Nucleoside analogues have been shown to suppress viral replication effectively. To investigate the effect of famciclovir in immunosuppressed patients, 21 heart transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection were included in a prospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients have been treated with Famciclovir for a median of 14 months. Hepatitis B virus replication and biochemical parameters were regularly tested and liver biopsies were taken before treatment and after a median time of 7 months. HBV-polymerase was sequenced in all patients before therapy and in those patients who experienced virological breakthrough.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were treated for at least 6 months. Hepatitis B virus-DNA levels declined in all patients and became negative in 8 patients. Mean hepatitis B virus-DNA levels decreased from 199+/-269 to 34+/-53 pg/ml after 24 weeks (P=0.003). During treatment HBeAg became negative in five patients. Mean alanine aminotransferase decreased from 42+/-26 to 24+/-10 U/L (P=0.006). Histological analysis revealed improved inflammatory activity according to the Ishak-score in 11/16 (69%) patients. Total inflammatory activity scores decreased from 8 to 6 (median, NS), but interface hepatitis score (P=0.02) and lobular inflammation score (P=0.006) improved significantly. Median fibrosis scores fell from 5 to 3 (P=0.002). Three patients developed virological breakthrough on famciclovir after 7, 8, and 26 months of treatment showing HBV-polymerase amino acid changes L528 M, S567A, and I581K, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Famciclovir improves not only biochemical and virological features but also hepatic inflammation and liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B under heavy immunosuppression. Virological breakthrough may develop and requires close monitoring.

Long-term ganciclovir therapy for hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) disease on a liver graft is associated with florid viral replication and graft failure. The aim of this study performed between 1992 and 1995 was to investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term intravenous ganciclovir for HBV infection in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twelve patients with HBV re-infection and four with de novo HBV infection were studied. HBV DNA was positive in all (median titer: 437.5 pg/ml) and HBeAg was positive in seven. Intravenous ganciclovir was started after a median of 14.5 months from HBsAg positivation and continued for a median of 10 months.

RESULTS

A complete response with HBV DNA negativation was seen in ten cases, a partial response with a decrease of more than 50% of initial HBV DNA levels in four and no response in two. Overall tolerance was good. Among the ten complete responders, two seroconverted for both HBsAg and HBeAg and one for HBsAg alone. Among these ten patients, three were re-transplanted for liver failure: two of them are alive; three had a viral breakthrough during treatment; and four remained HBV DNA negative: two are alive and two died. Partial responders and nonresponders were treated with other antiviral agents and three were re-transplanted, two of them are alive. Overall 12 out of 16 patients (75%) survived with a median follow up of 46 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term intravenous ganciclovir can persistently inhibit HBV DNA replication in liver transplant recipients and is well tolerated. Further evaluation should be encouraged, especially for HBV recurrence after first-line treatments.

Mutational pattern of hepatitis B virus on sequential therapy with famciclovir and lamivudine in patients with hepatitis B virus reinfection occurring under HBIg immunoglobulin after liver transplantation

Famciclovir (FCV) and lamivudine (LAM) reduce viral replication in patients with recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Eighteen of 20 patients with insufficient response to FCV were treated with 100 mg LAM daily after OLT. These patients had shown nonresponse (n = 5), partial response (n = 7), or breakthrough (n = 6) during FCV therapy. Despite passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin after liver transplantation, HBV reinfection had occurred in 14 of 15 transplanted patients. HBV-DNA levels and the regions A to E of the HBV-DNA polymerase gene were analyzed before and after treatment failure to either therapy. Within 4 weeks on LAM, all but 1 patient showed a 95% average reduction of the HBV-DNA level. As with FCV, we did not observe any severe side-effects attributable to LAM. However, 7 patients developed a breakthrough within 12, 29 (n = 2), 32, 37, 54, and 145 weeks under treatment with LAM associated with the methionine-to-valine signature mutation (M552V) in the YMDD motif in all. With FCV, no unique, but a dominant, resistance pattern with the L528M mutation was identified for patients with breakthrough under FCV. In contrast, nonresponders or patients with partial response to FCV did not exhibit such mutations. Our results indicate that the L528M mutation is a risk factor for LAM breakthrough, because breakthrough during LAM occurred earlier in patients with this mutation (50 +/- 10 weeks vs. 120 +/- 21 weeks). Because breakthrough on either treatment is frequent for this specific group of patients, the use of combination therapy should be explored.

Perspectives for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infections

Primarily resulting as a spin-off of the search for effective anti-HSV or anti-HIV agents, several compounds have been identified as effective and promising candidate anti-HBV drugs, i.e. famciclovir (penciclovir), BMS-200475, lamivudine (3TC), (-)FTC, L(-)Fd4C, L-FMAU, DAPD (DXG), bis(POM)-PMEA and bis(POC)-PMPA. They all inhibit HBV replication in Hep G2 2.2.15 at concentrations that are well below the cytotoxicity threshold. All these nucleoside analogues require three phosphorylation steps to be active, in their triphosphate form, as inhibitors of the HBV DNA polymerase, except for PMEA (adefovir) and PMPA (tenofovir), which need only two phosphorylation steps, to PMEApp and PMPApp, respectively, to interact as chain terminators with the HBV DNA polymerase reaction. Several of these compounds (for example, famciclovir, lamivudine and adefovir) have proven to be efficacious in the duck and/or woodchuck hepatitis models, and, accordingly, famciclovir, lamivudine and adefovir have also proven to be effective (i.e. in reducing HBV DNA levels) in patients with chronic HBV infection. Yet, famciclovir and lamivudine may lead to the emergence of resistance mutations (i.e. L528M and M552V/I) in the HBV DNA polymerase upon long-term treatment. These penciclovir- and lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants still retain susceptibility to adefovir, which, in turn, has so far not been found to engender resistance mutations in HBV. As has become obvious from the experience with the treatment of HIV infections, future HBV chemotherapy may reside in combination drug therapy so as to achieve the highest possible virus reduction, thereby minimizing the likelihood of drug resistance development.

Absence of mutations in the YMDD motif/B region of the hepatitis B virus polymerase in famciclovir therapy failure

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Nucleoside analogues such as lamivudine and famciclovir are potent drugs for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Breakthrough infections during lamivudine therapy are associated with mutations in the YMDD motif and putative B region of the HBV polymerase. This study investigated whether failure of famciclovir therapy is also associated with presence or emergence of particular mutations in the HBV polymerase.

METHODS

We analyzed longitudinally the sequence of the priming and polymerase domain in seven patients with primary non-response to therapy and two patients with a breakthrough during therapy. Two patients who responded to therapy served as a control.

RESULTS

The YMDD motif and the B region were conserved in all isolates. V-->I changes at position 555 just downstream of the YMDD motif were observed before and during therapy in a virus subpopulation of two patients with a primary non-response. In patients with a breakthrough, 378-V-->I and 424-N-->D mutations emerged in the N terminal part of the polymerase domain during follow-up. Lamivudine rescue therapy initiated in four patients, including a patient infected with YMDD(555-V-->I) variants, efficiently reduced viremia.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that failure of famciclovir therapy can occur independently of mutations in the YMDD motif or B region of the HBV polymerase and provide a rationale for rescue therapy with lamivudine.