Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation: immunohistochemical assessment of the viral antigen

Post-liver transplant hepatitis C virus recurrence: an unresolved thorny problem

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis represents the leading cause of liver transplantation in developed, Western and Eastern countries. Unfortunately, liver transplantation does not cure recipient HCV infection: reinfection universally occurs and disease progression is faster after liver transplant. In this review we focus on what happens throughout the peri-transplant phase and in the first 6-12 mo after transplantation: during this crucial period a completely new balance between HCV, liver graft, the recipient's immune response and anti-rejection therapy is achieved that will deeply affect subsequent outcomes. Nearly all patients show an early graft reinfection, with HCV viremia reaching and exceeding pre-transplant levels; in this setting, histological assessment is essential to differentiate recurrent hepatitis C from acute or chronic rejection; however, differentiating the two patterns remains difficult. The host immune response (mainly cellular mediated) appears to be crucial both in the control of HCV infection and in the genesis of rejection, and it is also strongly influenced by immunosuppressive treatment. At present no clear immunosuppressive strategy could be strongly recommended in HCV-positive recipients to prevent HCV recurrence, even immunotherapy appears to be ineffective. Nonetheless it seems reasonable that episodes of rejection and over-immunosuppression are more likely to enhance the risk of HCV recurrence through immunological mechanisms. Both complete prevention of rejection and optimization of immunosuppression should represent the main goals towards reducing the rate of graft HCV reinfection. In conclusion, post-transplant HCV recurrence remains an unresolved, thorny problem because many factors remain obscure and need to be better determined.

Human liver transplantation as a model to study hepatitis C virus pathogenesis

Hepatitis C is a leading etiology of liver cancer and a leading reason for liver transplantation. Although new therapies have improved the rates of sustained response, a large proportion of patients (approximately 50%) fail to respond to antiviral treatment, thus remaining at risk for disease progression. Although chimpanzees have been used to study hepatitis C virus biology and treatments, their cost is quite high, and their use is strictly regulated; indeed, the National Institutes of Health no longer supports the breeding of chimpanzees for study. The development of hepatitis C virus therapies has been hindered by the relative paucity of small animal models for studying hepatitis C virus pathogenesis. This review presents the strengths of human liver transplantation and highlights the advances derived from this model, including insights into viral kinetics and quasispecies, viral receptor binding and entry, and innate and adaptive immunity. Moreover, consideration is given to current and emerging antiviral therapeutic approaches based on translational research results.

Immunohistochemical staining of liver grafts with a monoclonal antibody against HCV-Envelope 2 for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation

AIM

We evaluated the expression of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen on liver grafts by immunohistochemical staining (IHS) using IG222 monoclonal antibody (mAb) against HCV-envelope 2 (E2).

METHODS

The study material was 84 liver biopsy specimens obtained from 28 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCV infection. The biopsy samples were examined histopathologically, and by IHS using IG222 mAb against HCV-E2. Serum HCV-RNA level was measured in all patients. The IHS grades were compared among the three groups classified according to the time elapsed from LDLT (at 1-30, 31-179 and > or =180 days post-LDLT) and among four post-transplant conditions, including acute cellular rejection (ACR).

RESULTS

Immunoreactivity to IG222 was detected in 78.6% of the specimens obtained during the first month after LDLT, and there were no significant differences on the IHS grades between the three groups classified according to the time elapsed from LDLT. The IHS grades were significantly stronger in definite recurrent HCV (n = 12) and probable recurrent HCV (n = 7) than in definite ACR (n = 7) and other complications (n = 8). There were no significant differences in serum HCV-RNA levels among the four post-transplant conditions. There was no significant correlation between the IHS grades using IG222 mAb and serum HCV-RNA levels when data of 84 liver biopsy specimens were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Constant HCV-E2 expression was observed in liver biopsy specimens obtained 1 month or longer. The strong HCV-E2 expression on liver grafts were associated with recurrent hepatitis C after LDLT, but the serum HCV-RNA levels were not.

Early recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

1. Early recurrence of hepatitis C is universal. 2. Typical histopathologic features of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and acute allograft rejection (AAR) exist. 3. Early recurrent HCV may be differentiated from AAR. 4. Liver biopsy plays a role in diagnosing HCV and AAR. 5. Risk factors for recurrent HCV should be known. 6. The natural history of recurrent HCV should be known. 7. The future role of ancillary studies beyond liver biopsy is assessed.

Detection of HCV antigens in liver graft: relevance to the management of recurrent post-liver transplant hepatitis C

The aim of this study was to evaluate how the immunohistochemical detection of liver hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens (HCV-Ag) could support the histologic diagnosis and influence the clinical management of post-liver transplantation (LT) liver disease. A total of 215 liver specimens from 152 HCV-positive patients with post-LT liver disease were studied. Histologic coding was: hepatitis (126), rejection (34), undefined (24; coexisting rejection grade I and hepatitis), or other (31). The percentage of HCV-Ag infected hepatocytes were evaluated, on frozen sections, by an immunoperoxidase technique. HCV-Ag were detectable early in 57% of cases within 30 days post-LT, 92% of cases between 31 and 180 days, and 74% of cases after more than 180 days. Overall, HCV-Ag were detected more frequently in histologic hepatitis as compared to rejection (P < 0.0001) with a higher percentage of positive hepatocytes (P < 0.00001). In 16 patients with a high number of HCV-Ag-positive hepatocytes (65%; range 40-90%) a clinical diagnosis of recurrent hepatitis (RHC) was made despite inconclusive histopathologic diagnosis. Multivariate analysis identified the percentage of HCV-Ag-positive hepatocytes and the time post-LT as independent predictors for RHC (P = 0.008 and P = 0.041, respectively) and the number of HCV-Ag-positive hepatocytes >/=50% as the only independent predictor for nonresponse (P < 0.001) in 26 patients treated with alpha-interferon plus ribavirin. In conclusion, HCV reinfection occurs early post-LT, reaching its peak within 6 months. Immunohistochemical detection of post-LT HCV reinfection support the diagnosis of hepatitis when the histologic features are not conclusive. A high number of infected cells, independently from the genotype, represents a negative predictive factor of response to antiviral treatment.

HepG2 cells support viral replication and gene expression of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 in vitro

AIM

To establish a cell culture system with long-term replication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome and expression of viral antigens in vitro.

METHODS

HepG2 cell line was tested for its susceptibility to HCV by incubation with a serum from a patient with chronic hepatitis C. Cells and supernatant were harvested at various time points during the culture. Culture supernatant was tested for its ability to infect naive cells. The presence of minus (antisense) RNA strand, and the detection of core and E1 antigens in cells were examined by RT-PCR and immunological techniques (flow cytometry and Western blot) respectively.

RESULTS

The intracellular HCV RNA was first detected on d 3 after infection and then could be consistently detected in both cells and supernatant over a period of at least three months. The fresh cells could be infected with supernatant from cultured infected cells. Flow cytometric analysis showed surface and intracellular HCV antigen expression using in house made polyclonal antibodies (anti-core, and anti-E1). Western blot analysis showed the expression of a cluster of immunogenic peptides at molecular weights extended between 31 and 45 kDa in an one month old culture of infected cells whereas this cluster was undetectable in uninfected HepG2 cells.

CONCLUSION

HepG2 cell line is not only susceptible to HCV infection but also supports its replication in vitro. Expression of HCV structural proteins can be detected in infected HepG2 cells. These cells are also capable of shedding viral particles into culture media which in turn become infectious to uninfected cells.

HepG2 cells support viral replication and gene expression of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 in vitro

AIM

To establish a cell culture system with long-term replication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome and expression of viral antigens in vitro.

METHODS

HepG2 cell line was tested for its susceptibility to HCV by incubation with a serum from a patient with chronic hepatitis C. Cells and supernatant were harvested at various time points during the culture. Culture supernatant was tested for its ability to infect naive cells. The presence of minus (antisense) RNA strand, and the detection of core and E1 antigens in cells were examined by RT-PCR and immunological techniques (flow cytometry and Western blot) respectively.

RESULTS

The intracellular HCV RNA was first detected on d 3 after infection and then could be consistently detected in both cells and supernatant over a period of at least three months. The fresh cells could be infected with supernatant from cultured infected cells. Flow cytometric analysis showed surface and intracellular HCV antigen expression using in house made polyclonal antibodies (anti-core, and anti-E1). Western blot analysis showed the expression of a cluster of immunogenic peptides at molecular weights extended between 31 and 45 kDa in an one month old culture of infected cells whereas this cluster was undetectable in uninfected HepG2 cells.

CONCLUSION

HepG2 cell line is not only susceptible to HCV infection but also supports its replication in vitro. Expression of HCV structural proteins can be detected in infected HepG2 cells. These cells are also capable of shedding viral particles into culture media which in turn become infectious to uninfected cells.

Immunohistochemical assessment of hepatitis C virus antigen in cholestatic hepatitis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with common variable immunodeficiency may exhibit rapidly progressive hepatitis when infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), leading to cirrhosis and liver failure. Liver transplantation in these patients may result in a cholestatic form of HCV reinfection with exceptionally high virus loads.

AIMS

To report an immunohistochemical investigation of the pretransplant and post-transplant liver of one such patient.

METHODS/RESULTS

On immunohistochemical staining of frozen sections with anti-HCV core monoclonal antibody or fluorescein labelled human polyclonal anti-HCV IgG, no HCV antigens were demonstrated in the native cirrhotic liver removed at transplant, despite a viral load of 10(6.4) genomes/g. The transplanted liver, collected six weeks post-transplant, exhibited cholestatic recurrent hepatitis, had an HCV virus load of 10(10) genomes/g of liver, and revealed HCV antigen in the cytoplasm of most hepatocytes, with a pronounced periportal distribution. No virus antigen was demonstrable in other cell types. The core antigen was also detected in paraffin wax embedded, formaldehyde fixed tissue of this liver after high temperature antigen retrieval, but not in the native cirrhotic liver or a selection of HCV positive livers collected pretransplant from immunocompetent patients. Attempts to delineate the distribution of E1, NS3, and NS4 antigens were unsuccessful because monoclonal antibodies to these antigens produced "false positive" staining of foci of hepatocytes in the post-transplant livers of HCV seronegative patients with cholestasis.

CONCLUSION

This case provided an opportunity to study the natural development of HCV during acute infection in the absence of an immune response, and may help to elucidate the pathogenesis of HCV recurrence in liver allografts.

HCV infection of the transplanted liver: changing CD81 and HVR1 variants immediately after liver transplantation

The second envelope protein at hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) has been implicated in contributing to hepatitis C virus (HCV)-host cell interactions and CD81 (a multifunctional protein) has been demonstrated to act as a cell surface receptor for HCV and may interact directly with HVR1. The purpose of the current study was to determine if certain HVR1 quasispecies variants more effectively associate with and infect allografts after liver transplantation than other HVR1 variants and whether CD81 receptor expression changes after transplantation. Blood and allograft samples were obtained from the peritransplant period in seven patients. Clones of RT-PCR product were directly sequenced to identify HVR1 quasispecies variants. Explanted liver and serial allograft biopsies in recipients with HCV were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD81 expression. Examination of HVR1 sequences demonstrated that only a fraction of the quasispecies variants recovered from each patient's blood sampled immediately prior to transplantation associated with and infected the allografts. Genetic diversity at HVR1 decreased with reperfusion but did not significantly decrease with infection. Expression of CD81 varied during the immediate post-transplant period. In conclusion, HVR1 quasispecies variants differentially associate with, and infect allografts, after liver transplantation. Additionally, allografts express variable amounts of CD81 after transplantation.

E2 quasispecies specificity of hepatitis C virus association with allografts immediately after liver transplantation

It is unknown whether all hepatitis C virus (HCV) quasispecies variants found within patient serum have equal capacity to associate with the liver after transplantation; however, in vitro models of HCV infection suggest that variations in the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of the second envelope protein (E2) may be important in infectivity. The hypothesis of the current study is that the two hypervariable regions (HVR1 and HVR2) within E2 are important in the initial virus-liver interaction, and, therefore, certain HCV quasispecies variants will be isolated from the liver after reperfusion. In 8 patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to HCV infection, HCV envelope quasispecies were determined from intraoperative serum samples obtained before the anhepatic phase of transplantation and from liver biopsies 1.5 to 2.5 hours after the transplanted liver was perfused. Explanted (native) liver biopsies were taken as a control. Sequence analysis was performed on clones of specific HCV reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction products spanning HVR1 and HVR2 of the E2 protein. HVR1 was more variable than HVR2 for all samples. Quasispecies isolated from postperfusion liver differed more from serum than did explanted liver quasispecies at HVR1 (P = 0.03) but not at HVR2 (P = 0.2). Comparison of HVR1 sequences from postperfusion liver versus serum revealed significantly less HVR1 genetic complexity and diversity (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). Immediately after transplantation but before actual infection, liver allografts select out from the infecting serum inoculum a less heterogeneous, more closely related population of quasispecies variants.

Timing of reinfection and mechanisms of hepatocellular damage in transplanted hepatitis C virus-reinfected liver

Pathogenic mechanisms and dynamics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are poorly defined. This study focuses on these aspects by studying 55 frozen biopsy specimens from transplant recipients with various histological diagnoses obtained from 4 days to 4 years post-OLT and 10 patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis. The percentage of HCV-infected hepatocytes, number and distribution of CD8 and natural killer cells, and rates of hepatocellular apoptosis and proliferation were quantified by immunohistochemistry. HCV antigens were detected in 37% of biopsy specimens obtained within 20 days and 90% of biopsy specimens obtained from 21 days to 6 months after OLT. The number of HCV-infected hepatocytes was never less than 40% in acute hepatitis specimens and never greater than 30% in the other cases. Hepatocellular apoptosis was high in biopsy specimens of acute hepatitis and moderate in those from transplant recipients with normal histological characteristics, but still greater than in specimens of chronic active hepatitis. Proliferation correlated significantly with apoptosis. Lymphocyte infiltration was high and similar among cases of acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, and rejection. These data: (1) show that the detection of liver HCV antigens is sensitive enough to be used in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool to detect infection of the transplanted liver and might be useful, combined with conventional histological evaluation to detect hepatitic damage, for therapeutic decision making; (2) suggest direct cytotoxicity of HCV, as well as immunologic mechanisms possibly prevalent in chronic hepatitis and rejection, at least in the phase of acute massive liver infection; and (3) show that hepatocellular apoptosis and regeneration might be active enough to lead to replacement of the entire transplanted liver in 2 weeks.

Hepatitis C virus infection of human hepatoma cell line 7721 in vitro

AIM: To establish a cell culture system with long-term replication of hepatitis C virus in vitro.

METHODS: Human hepatoma cell line 7721 was tested for its susceptibility to HCV by incubating with a serum from a patient with chronic hepatitis C. Cells and supernatant were harvested at various phases during the culturing periods. The presence of HCV RNA, the expression of HCV antigens in cells and/or supernatant were examined by RT-PCR, in situ hybridization and immunohisto-chemistry respectively.

RESULTS: The intracellular HCV RNA was first detected on d2 after infection and then could be intermittently detected in both cells and supernatant over a period of at least three months. The expression of HCV NS₃, CP₁₀ antigens could be observed in cells. The fresh cells could be infected by supernatant from cultured infected cells and the transmission of viral genome from HCV-infected 7721 cells to PBMCs was also observed.

CONCLUSION: The hepatoma line 7721 is not only susceptible to HCV but also supports its long-term replication in vitro.

Intragraft localization of activated nuclear factor kappaB in recurrent hepatitis C virus disease following liver transplantation

Nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) is activated during viral infection and is central to the regulation of host immune responses. The NF-kappaB activation status and its morphological sources were assessed by immunohistochemistry in allograft biopsy specimens of orthotopic liver transplantation patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV). Hepatocellular NF-kappaB immunostaining was detected in HCV cases compared with controls (nontransplant: P <.001; transplant: P =.006), which correlated with the number of NF-kappaB positive hepatocytes (P =.007) and contrasted to the absent to weak staining of controls (nontransplant: P =.001; transplant: P =.009). Enhanced NF-kappaB staining of cytokeratin 19-positive bile ducts and proliferating ductules in the HCV group was in contrast to controls. Intense NF-kappaB immunoreactivity was detected in CD68-positive Kupffer cells and macrophages of all HCV specimens compared with a few controls (nontransplant: P <.001; transplant: P =.001) and contrasted to the weak staining of controls (nontransplant: P <.001; transplant: P =.001). NF-kappaB-positive immunoreactivity correlated with the number of T cell receptor (TCR) alpha/beta-positive lymphocytes (P <.001), which was not observed in controls. In those HCV cases showing evidence of necroinflammatory activity (grade) and individual features of portal inflammation, periportal inflammation/piecemeal necrosis, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis (stage), higher NF-kappaB staining intensity scores within bile ducts, proliferating ductules, hepatocytes (piecemeal necrosis: P =.016; stage: P =.030), and lymphocytes (stage: P =.044) and increased number of NF-kappaB-positive cells within bile ducts, proliferating ductules (grade, lobular inflammation, piecemeal necrosis, stage: P =.022), hepatocytes, and lymphocytes were observed. Increased staining intensity and frequency of NF-kappaB-positive cells were similarly observed in HCV-positive allografts obtained from patients under tacrolimus- compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. These data implicate an immunoregulatory role of intragraft NF-kappaB activation in the pathogenesis and progression of posttransplantation HCV disease recurrence.