1
|
Wu CW, Lin BS, Zhang Z, Hsieh TH, Liou JC, Lo WL, Li YT, Chiu SC, Peng CW. Pilot study of using transcranial temporal interfering theta-burst stimulation for modulating motor excitability in rat. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2024; 21:147. [PMID: 39215318 PMCID: PMC11365202 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01451-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is a promising brain stimulation method that can target deep brain regions by delivering an interfering current from surface electrodes. Most instances of tTIS stimulate the brain with a single-frequency sinusoidal waveform generated by wave interference. Theta burst stimulation is an effective stimulation scheme that can modulate neuroplasticity by generating long-term potentiation- or depression-like effects. To broaden tTIS application, we developed a theta burst protocol using tTIS technique to modulate neuroplasticity in rats. Two cannula electrodes were unilaterally implanted into the intact skull over the primary motor cortex. Electrical field of temporal interference envelopes generated by tTIS through cannula electrodes were recorded from primary motor cortex. Theta burst schemes were characterized, and motor activation induced by the stimulation was also evaluated simultaneously by observing electromyographic signals from the corresponding brachioradialis muscle. After validating the stimulation scheme, we further tested the modulatory effects of theta burst stimulation delivered by tTIS and by conventional transcranial electrical stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability. Changes in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials, elicited when the primary motor cortex was activated by electrical pulses, were measured before and after theta burst stimulation by both techniques. Significant potentiation and suppression were found at 15 to 30 min after the intermittent and continuous theta burst stimulation delivered using tTIS, respectively. However, comparing to theta burst stimulations delivered using conventional form of transcranial electrical stimulation, using tTIS expressed no significant difference in modulating motor evoked potential amplitudes. Sham treatment from both methods had no effect on changing the motor evoked potential amplitude. The present study demonstrated the feasibility of using tTIS to achieve a theta burst stimulation scheme for motor cortical neuromodulation. These findings also indicated the future potential of using tTIS to carry out theta burst stimulation protocols in deep-brain networks for modulating neuroplasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Wei Wu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan
| | - Bor-Shing Lin
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University, New Taipei City 237303, Taiwan
| | - Zhao Zhang
- School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Wuyi University, Wuyishan City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Tsung-Hsun Hsieh
- School of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Neuroscience Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Chiun Liou
- School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Lun Lo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ting Li
- Taiwan Instrument Research Institute, National Applied Research Laboratories, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Shao-Chu Chiu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Peng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
- School of Gerontology and Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Optomechatronics, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tass PA, Bokil H. Editorial: Neuromodulation using spatiotemporally complex patterns. Front Neuroinform 2024; 18:1454834. [PMID: 39165628 PMCID: PMC11334158 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1454834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Tass
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States,
| | - Hemant Bokil
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng K, Li Z, Xia X, Wang Z, Darmani G, Li X, Chen R. Effects of different sonication parameters of theta burst transcranial ultrasound stimulation on human motor cortex. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:258-268. [PMID: 38442800 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Theta burst TUS (tbTUS) can induce increased cortical excitability in human, but how different sonication parameters influence the effects are still unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine how a range of sonication parameters, including acoustic intensity, pulse repetition frequency, duty cycle and sonication duration, influence the effects of tbTUS on human motor cortical excitability. METHODS 14 right-handed healthy subjects underwent 8 sessions with different tbTUS parameters in a randomized, cross-over design on separate days. The original tbTUS protocol was studied in one session and one parameter was changed in each of the seven sessions. To examine changes in cortical excitability induced by tbTUS, we measured the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, resting motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation, as well as short-interval intracortical facilitation before and up to 90 min after tbTUS. RESULTS All conditions increased MEP amplitudes except the condition with low acoustic intensity of 10 W/cm2. Pulse repetition frequency of 5 Hz produced higher MEP amplitudes compared to pulse repetition frequencies of 2 and 10 Hz. In addition, higher duty cycles (5%, 10%, and 15%) and longer sonication durations (40, 80, and 120 s) were associated with longer duration of increased MEP amplitudes. Resting motor threshold remained stable in all conditions. For paired-pulse TMS measures, tbTUS reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition and enhanced short-interval intracortical facilitation, but had no effect on intracortical facilitation. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound bursts repeated at theta (∼5 Hz) frequency is optimal to produce increased cortical excitability with the range of 2-10 Hz. Furthermore, there was a dose-response effect regarding duty cycle and sonication duration in tbTUS for plasticity induction. The aftereffects of tbTUS were associated with a shift of the inhibition/excitation balance toward less inhibition and more excitation in the motor cortex. These findings can be used to determine the optimal tbTUS parameters in neuroscience research and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Zeng
- Center for Cognition and Neuroergonomics, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China; Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhiwei Li
- School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China
| | - Xue Xia
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; School of Social Development and Health Management, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; School of Sport and Health Science, Xi'an Physical Education University, Xi'an, China
| | - Ghazaleh Darmani
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xiaoli Li
- Center for Cognition and Neuroergonomics, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnson KA, Dosenbach NUF, Gordon EM, Welle CG, Wilkins KB, Bronte-Stewart HM, Voon V, Morishita T, Sakai Y, Merner AR, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Williamson T, Horn A, Gilron R, O'Keeffe J, Gittis AH, Neumann WJ, Little S, Provenza NR, Sheth SA, Fasano A, Holt-Becker AB, Raike RS, Moore L, Pathak YJ, Greene D, Marceglia S, Krinke L, Tan H, Bergman H, Pötter-Nerger M, Sun B, Cabrera LY, McIntyre CC, Harel N, Mayberg HS, Krystal AD, Pouratian N, Starr PA, Foote KD, Okun MS, Wong JK. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: pushing the forefront of neuromodulation with functional network mapping, biomarkers for adaptive DBS, bioethical dilemmas, AI-guided neuromodulation, and translational advancements. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1320806. [PMID: 38450221 PMCID: PMC10915873 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1320806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank XI was held on August 9-11, 2023 in Gainesville, Florida with the theme of "Pushing the Forefront of Neuromodulation". The keynote speaker was Dr. Nico Dosenbach from Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. He presented his research recently published in Nature inn a collaboration with Dr. Evan Gordon to identify and characterize the somato-cognitive action network (SCAN), which has redefined the motor homunculus and has led to new hypotheses about the integrative networks underpinning therapeutic DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers, and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies, as well as logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The group estimated that globally more than 263,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: cutting-edge translational neuromodulation, cutting-edge physiology, advances in neuromodulation from Europe and Asia, neuroethical dilemmas, artificial intelligence and computational modeling, time scales in DBS for mood disorders, and advances in future neuromodulation devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara A. Johnson
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Nico U. F. Dosenbach
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Evan M. Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Cristin G. Welle
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Valerie Voon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Takashi Morishita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuki Sakai
- ATR Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Amanda R. Merner
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- MGH Neurosurgery and Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Aryn H. Gittis
- Biological Sciences and Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Division of Neurology, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network (UHN), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abbey B. Holt-Becker
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Lisa Moore
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | | | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Sara Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Newronika SPA, Milan, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Edmond and Lily Safar Center (ELSC) for Brain Research and Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Laura Y. Cabrera
- Neuroethics, Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Philosophy, and Bioethics, and the Rock Ethics Institute, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States
| | - Cameron C. McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Noam Harel
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andrew D. Krystal
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sandoval-Pistorius SS, Hacker ML, Waters AC, Wang J, Provenza NR, de Hemptinne C, Johnson KA, Morrison MA, Cernera S. Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications. J Neurosci 2023; 43:7575-7586. [PMID: 37940596 PMCID: PMC10634582 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1427-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for various neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, involving chronic implantation of electrodes into target brain regions for electrical stimulation delivery. Despite its safety and efficacy, DBS remains an underutilized therapy. Advances in the field of DBS, including in technology, mechanistic understanding, and applications have the potential to expand access and use of DBS, while also improving clinical outcomes. Developments in DBS technology, such as MRI compatibility and bidirectional DBS systems capable of sensing neural activity while providing therapeutic stimulation, have enabled advances in our understanding of DBS mechanisms and its application. In this review, we summarize recent work exploring DBS modulation of target networks. We also cover current work focusing on improved programming and the development of novel stimulation paradigms that go beyond current standards of DBS, many of which are enabled by sensing-enabled DBS systems and have the potential to expand access to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mallory L Hacker
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
| | - Allison C Waters
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
- Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Melanie A Morrison
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gülke E, Horn MA, Caffier J, Pinnschmidt H, Hamel W, Moll CKE, Gulberti A, Pötter-Nerger M. Comparison of subthalamic unilateral and bilateral theta burst deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1233565. [PMID: 37868697 PMCID: PMC10585145 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1233565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
High-frequency, conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is usually applied bilaterally under the assumption of additive effects due to interhemispheric crosstalk. Theta burst stimulation (TBS-DBS) represents a new patterned stimulation mode with 5 Hz interburst and 200 Hz intraburst frequency, whose stimulation effects in a bilateral mode compared to unilateral are unknown. This single-center study evaluated acute motor effects of the most affected, contralateral body side in 17 PD patients with unilateral subthalamic TBS-DBS and 11 PD patients with bilateral TBS-DBS. Compared to therapy absence, both unilateral and bilateral TBS-DBS significantly improved (p < 0.05) lateralized Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores. Bilateral TBS-DBS revealed only slight, but not significant additional effects in comparison to unilateral TBS-DBS on total lateralized motor scores, but on the subitem lower limb rigidity. These results indicate that bilateral TBS-DBS has limited additive beneficial effects compared to unilateral TBS-DBS in the short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen Gülke
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin A. Horn
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julian Caffier
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans Pinnschmidt
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hamel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian K. E. Moll
- Institute of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Gulberti
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Najera RA, Mahavadi AK, Khan AU, Boddeti U, Del Bene VA, Walker HC, Bentley JN. Alternative patterns of deep brain stimulation in neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Neuroinform 2023; 17:1156818. [PMID: 37415779 PMCID: PMC10320008 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2023.1156818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used clinical therapy that modulates neuronal firing in subcortical structures, eliciting downstream network effects. Its effectiveness is determined by electrode geometry and location as well as adjustable stimulation parameters including pulse width, interstimulus interval, frequency, and amplitude. These parameters are often determined empirically during clinical or intraoperative programming and can be altered to an almost unlimited number of combinations. Conventional high-frequency stimulation uses a continuous high-frequency square-wave pulse (typically 130-160 Hz), but other stimulation patterns may prove efficacious, such as continuous or bursting theta-frequencies, variable frequencies, and coordinated reset stimulation. Here we summarize the current landscape and potential clinical applications for novel stimulation patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo A. Najera
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Anil K. Mahavadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Anas U. Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Ujwal Boddeti
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Victor A. Del Bene
- Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Harrison C. Walker
- Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - J. Nicole Bentley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Okun MS, Hickey PT, Machado AG, Kuncel AM, Grill WM. Temporally optimized patterned stimulation (TOPS®) as a therapy to personalize deep brain stimulation treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:929509. [PMID: 36092643 PMCID: PMC9454097 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.929509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established therapy for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but there remains an opportunity to improve symptom relief. The temporal pattern of stimulation is a new parameter to consider in DBS therapy, and we compared the effectiveness of Temporally Optimized Patterned Stimulation (TOPS) to standard DBS at reducing the motor symptoms of PD. Twenty-six subjects with DBS for PD received three different patterns of stimulation (two TOPS and standard) while on medication and using stimulation parameters optimized for standard DBS. Side effects and motor symptoms were assessed after 30 min of stimulation with each pattern. Subjects experienced similar types of side effects with TOPS and standard DBS, and TOPS were well-tolerated by a majority of the subjects. On average, the most effective TOPS was as effective as standard DBS at reducing the motor symptoms of PD. In some subjects a TOPS pattern was the most effective pattern. Finally, the TOPS pattern with low average frequency was found to be as effective or more effective in about half the subjects while substantially reducing estimated stimulation energy use. TOPS DBS may provide a new programing option to improve DBS therapy for PD by improving symptom reduction and/or increasing energy efficiency. Optimizing stimulation parameters specifically for TOPS DBS may demonstrate further clinical benefit of TOPS DBS in treating the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- *Correspondence: Michael S. Okun,
| | - Patrick T. Hickey
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Andre G. Machado
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | - Warren M. Grill
- Deep Brain Innovations, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fasano A, Eliashiv D, Herman ST, Lundstrom BN, Polnerow D, Henderson JM, Fisher RS. Experience and consensus on stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for epilepsy. Epilepsia 2021; 62:2883-2898. [PMID: 34697794 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nuclei of thalamus (ANT-DBS) is effective for reduction of seizures, but little evidence is available to guide practitioners in the practical use of this therapy. In an attempt to fill this gap, a questionnaire with 37 questions was circulated to 578 clinicians who were either engaged in clinical trials of or known users of DBS for epilepsy, with responses from 141, of whom 58.2% were epileptologists and 28.4% neurosurgeons. Multiple regions of the world were represented. The survey found that the best candidates for DBS were considered those with temporal or frontal seizures, refractory to at least two medicines. Motivations for renewing therapy upon battery depletion were reduced convulsive, impaired awareness, and severe seizures and improved quality of life. Targeting of leads mainly was by magnetic resonance imaging, sometimes with intraoperative imaging or microelectrode recording. The majority used transventricular approaches. Stimulation parameters mostly imitated the SANTE study parameters, except for initial stimulation amplitudes in the 2-3-V or -mA range, versus 5 V in the SANTE study. Stimulation intensity was most often increased or reduced, respectively, for lack of efficacy or side effects, but changes in active contacts, cycle time, and pulse duration were also employed. Mood or memory problems or paresthesias were the side effects most responsible for adjustments. Off-label sites stimulated included centromedian thalamus, hippocampus, neocortex, and a few others. Several physicians used DBS in conjunction with vagus nerve stimulation or responsive neurostimulation, although our study did not track efficacy for combined use. Experienced users varied more from published parameters than did inexperienced users. In conclusion, surveys of experts can provide Class IV evidence for the most prevalent practical use of ANT-DBS. We present a flowchart for one protocol combining common practices. Controlled comparisons will be needed to choose the best approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Eliashiv
- Department of Neurology, UCLA Seizure Disorders Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Susan T Herman
- Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | | | - Jaimie M Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery and, by courtesy, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute and Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Robert S Fisher
- Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences and, by courtesy, Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sarica C, Iorio-Morin C, Aguirre-Padilla DH, Najjar A, Paff M, Fomenko A, Yamamoto K, Zemmar A, Lipsman N, Ibrahim GM, Hamani C, Hodaie M, Lozano AM, Munhoz RP, Fasano A, Kalia SK. Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: Challenges, Complications, and Strategies for Practicality and Longevity. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:708481. [PMID: 34512295 PMCID: PMC8427803 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.708481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents an important treatment modality for movement disorders and other circuitopathies. Despite their miniaturization and increasing sophistication, DBS systems share a common set of components of which the implantable pulse generator (IPG) is the core power supply and programmable element. Here we provide an overview of key hardware and software specifications of commercially available IPG systems such as rechargeability, MRI compatibility, electrode configuration, pulse delivery, IPG case architecture, and local field potential sensing. We present evidence-based approaches to mitigate hardware complications, of which infection represents the most important factor. Strategies correlating positively with decreased complications include antibiotic impregnation and co-administration and other surgical considerations during IPG implantation such as the use of tack-up sutures and smaller profile devices.Strategies aimed at maximizing battery longevity include patient-related elements such as reliability of IPG recharging or consistency of nightly device shutoff, and device-specific such as parameter delivery, choice of lead configuration, implantation location, and careful selection of electrode materials to minimize impedance mismatch. Finally, experimental DBS systems such as ultrasound, magnetoelectric nanoparticles, and near-infrared that use extracorporeal powered neuromodulation strategies are described as potential future directions for minimally invasive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Sarica
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christian Iorio-Morin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - David H Aguirre-Padilla
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Center Campus, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ahmed Najjar
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Michelle Paff
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Anton Fomenko
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kazuaki Yamamoto
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ajmal Zemmar
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery, Henan University School of Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mojgan Hodaie
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Renato P Munhoz
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|