Influence of glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1) genetic polymorphisms and smoking on susceptibility risk of chronic myeloid leukemia and treatment response

Alterations in pharmacogenetic genes and their implications for imatinib resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia patients from an admixed population

Imatinib is the tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as the gold standard for the treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. However, about 30% of patients do not respond well to this therapy. Variants in drug administration, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) genes play an important role in drug resistance especially in admixed populations. We investigated 129 patients diagnosed with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia treated with imatinib as first choice therapy. The participants of the study are highly admixed, populations that exhibit genetic diversity and complexity due to the contributions of multiple ancestral groups. Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate the association of 30 SNVs in genes related to response to treatment with Imatinibe in CML. Our results indicated that for the rs2290573 of the ULK3 gene, patients with the recessive AA genotype are three times more likely to develop resistance over time (secondary resistance) (p = 0.019, OR = 3.19, IC 95%= 1.21-8.36). Finally, we performed interaction analysis between the investigated variants and found several associations between SNVs and secondary resistance. We concluded that the variant rs2290573 of the ULK3 gene may be relevant for predicting treatment response of CML with imatinib, as well as possible treatment resistance. The use of predictive biomarkers is an important tool for therapeutic choice of patients, improving their quality of life and treatment efficacy.

Effects of Glutathione S-Transferases (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) gene variants in combination with smoking or drinking on cancers: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to systematically summarize the association between cancer risks and glutathione s-transferases (GSTs) among smokers and drinkers.

METHODS

Literature was searched through PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and WANFANG published from 2001 to 2022. Stata was used with fixed-effect model or random-effect model to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Sensitivity and heterogeneity calculations were performed, and publication bias was analyzed by Begg and Egger's test. Regression analysis was performed on the correlated variables about heterogeneity, and the false-positive report probabilities (FPRP) and the Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) were calculated to assess the confidence of a statistically significant association.

RESULTS

A total of 85 studies were eligible for GSTs and cancer with smoking status (19,604 cases and 23,710 controls), including 14 articles referring to drinking status (4409 cases and 5645 controls). GSTM1-null had significant associations with cancer risks (for smokers: OR = 1.347, 95% CI: 1.196-1.516, P < .001; for nonsmokers: OR = 1.423, 95% CI: 1.270-1.594, P < .001; for drinkers: OR = 1.748, 95% CI: 1.093-2.797, P = .02). GSTT1-null had significant associations with cancer risks (for smokers: OR = 1.356, 95% CI: 1.114-1.651, P = .002; for nonsmokers: OR = 1.103, 95% CI: 1.011-1.204, P = .028; for drinkers: OR = 1.423, 95% CI: 1.042-1.942, P = .026; for nondrinkers: OR = 1.458, 95% CI: 1.014-2.098, P = .042). Negative associations were found between GSTP1rs1695(AG + GG/AA) and cancer risks among nondrinkers (OR = 0.840, 95% CI: 0.711-0.985, P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

GSTM1-null and GSTT1-null might be related cancers in combination with smoking or drinking, and GSTP1rs1695 might be associated with cancers among drinkers.

The importance of polymorphisms in the genes encoding glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in development of selected cancers and cardiovascular diseases

Glutathione S-transferases are a family of enzymes, whose main role is to detoxify cells from many exogenous factors, such as xenobiotics or carcinogens. It has also been proven that changes in the genes encoding these enzymes may affect the incidence of selected cancers and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to review the most important reports related to the role of glutathione S-transferases in the pathophysiology of two of the most common diseases in modern society - cancers and cardiovascular diseases. It was shown that polymorphisms in the genes encoding glutathione S-transferases are associated with the development of these diseases. However, depending on the ethnic group, the researchers obtained divergent results related to this field. In the case of the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was shown an increased incidence of breast cancer in Asian women, while this relationship in European and African women was not found. Similarly. In the case of cardiovascular diseases, the differences in the influence of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and GSTA1 polymorphisms on their development or lack of it depending on the continent were shown. These examples show that the development of the above-mentioned diseases is not only influenced by genetic changes, but their pathophysiology is more complex. The mere presence of a specific genotype within a studied polymorphism may not predispose to cancer, but in combination with environmental factors, which often depend on the place of residence, it may elevate the chance of developing the selected disease.

Association of ABCB1, ABCG2 drug transporter polymorphisms and smoking with disease risk and cytogenetic response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

Despite acceptable results of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), some patients fail to acquire a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), which may be caused by polymorphisms in the pharmacogenetic genes. The study aimed to evaluate the association of two polymorphisms in the ABCB1 and ABCG2 genes with cytogenetic response to imatinib and the risk of CML development.

METHODS

We genotyped ABCB1 (c .2677G/T/A) and ABCG2 (c .421C/A) polymorphisms by PCR-RFLP, T-ARMS-PCR methods in 111 patients with CML and 102 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects. CCyR was determined by standard chromosome banding analysis (CBA).

RESULTS

Analysis of polymorphisms showed significant association of ABCG2 c.421CA genotype (p < 0.0001; OR = 0. 17), and ABCG2c.421A allele (p < 0.0001; OR = 0.31) with decreased risk of CML. Moreover, ABCB1c.2677GT- ABCG2c.421CC combined genotype (p = 0.017; OR = 4.20) was associated with increased risk of CML. Analysis of the joint effect of SNP-smoking combination showed that smoker subjects with the ABCB1c.2677GG/GT (p = 0.001; OR = 15.96, p = 0.001; OR = 8.13, respectively) or ABCG2c.421CC genotypes (p = 0.001; OR = 5.82) had the increased risk of CML, while the risk of the CML in non-smokers carrying the ABCG2c.421CA (p < 0.0001; OR = 0. 18) genotype was strongly decreased compared with reference group. Regarding drug response, ABCG2c.421 CC/CA genotypes in the smoker patients were associated with an increased risk of resistance to imatinib (p < 0.0001; OR = 7.02, p = 0.018; OR = 4.67, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest the impact of ABCG2c .421C/A polymorphism on CML development, and smoking may have a synergistic role in the risk of CML and resistance to imatinib.

Impact of GSTT1 and GSTM1 Polymorphisms in the Susceptibility to Philadelphia Negative Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

BACKGROUND

Our research aimed to clarify the role of genetic polymorphisms in GST (T1 and M1) in the development of Ph-ve CML.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report on a case-control study with 126 participants, divided into 26 patients with Ph-ve CML (57.7% male, 42.3% female) and 100 healthy volunteers (51% male, 49% female) with no medical history of cancer as a control population. All Ph-ve CML patients were diagnosed according to standard hematologic and cytogenetic criteria based on CBC, confirmed by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) to determine the presence or absence of the BCRABL gene, followed by bone marrow (BM) examination.

RESULTS

Of the 26 studied cases, 50% had the GSTT1 null genotype against 21% of the control group, a statistically significant difference (CI= 1.519 - 9.317; p-value= 0.004). The GSTM1 null genotype was detected in 23.1% of cases and 35% of controls, a difference not statistically significant (OR= 0.557; CI= 0.205-1.515; p-value= 0.252). The distribution of GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms was also examined according to gender, age and ethnic grouping; these findings revealed no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals a strong correlation between GSTT1 polymorphism and Ph-ve CML, whereas the data for GSTM1 polymorphisms indicates no role in the initial development of the disease. More studies are required to further clarify these and other genes' roles in disease development.

Association Between the Individual and Combined Effects of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms and Risk of Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Fourteen meta-analyses reported the individual effects of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on leukemia risk. However, over 40 studies were not included in previously published meta-analyses. Moreover, one key aspect was that previous meta-analyses did not conduct the false-positive test on the aforementioned issues. Furthermore, previous meta-analyses did not observe the combined effects of GSTM1 present/null and GSTT1 present/null polymorphism with leukemia risk. Therefore, we conducted the current study to further analyze these associations. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between the individual and combined effects of the GSTM1 present/null and GSTT1 present/null polymorphisms and the risk of leukemia. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed applying Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Moreover, false-positive report probability (FPRP) and Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) were applied to investigate the false-positive results. Results: The individual GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and combined effects of the two genes were associated with a significantly increased leukemia risk in overall and several subgroup analyses, such as Asians, Caucasians, and so on. Then, further analysis was conducted using FPRP and BFDP. Significant associations were considered as "positive" results on the GSTM1 null genotype with leukemia risk in overall populations (FPRP < 0.001 and BFDP = 0.006), Asians (FPRP < 0.001 and BFDP < 0.001), and East Asian population (FPRP < 0.001 and BFDP = 0.002). For the GSTT1 null genotype, significant associations were regarded "positive" results in overall populations, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Asians, and East Asian population. For the combined effects of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, significant associations were also considered "positive" results in the overall analysis of Asians, Indians, and East Asian population. Conclusion: This study strongly indicates that the individual GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and combined effects of the two genes are associated with increased leukemia risk in Asians, especially in the East Asian population; the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with increased AML risk; the combined effects of the two genes are associated with increased leukemia risk in Indians.

Influence of cytochrome P450 and glutathione S transferase polymorphisms on response to nilotinib therapy among chronic myeloidleukemia patients from Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) and glutathione S transferases (GSTs) are important biotransforming enzymes responsible for detoxification of anticancer drugs and carcinogens. Polymorphisms in these enzymes may greatly influence the susceptibility to CML and overall efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This study was aimed to estimate the possible influence of the polymorphisms of GSTs and CYP in the occurrence of CML as well as in predicting therapeutic outcome of nilotinib therapy in Pakistani CML patients.

METHODS

The polymorphic variability in CYP 1A1*2C, GSTP1 (A3131G), GSTT1 and GSTM1 was assessed either by RFLP or multiplex PCR. The BCR ABL1 transcripts were quantified by qPCR to monitor response to nilotinib.

RESULTS

The CYP1A1*2C heterozygous and GSTP1 homozygous polymorphisms seemed to be a contributing factor in developing CML. Altogether, there were 12 non-responders, 66 responders and 21 partial responders. The most frequent genotype was null GSTM1 in responders followed by CYP 1A1 and GSTP1 -wild type (p =  < 0.05). Whereas, homozygous GSTP1 and GSTT1 null genotype is significantly higher only among nilotinib non-responders.

CONCLUSION

Hence, it can be concluded that wild type CYP1A1, GSTP1 and null GSTM1 may be frequently linked to favorable outcome in patients treated with nilotinib as depicted by sustained deep molecular response in most CML patients.

GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in healthy volunteers - a worldwide systematic review

The GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes encode homonymous enzymes, which are responsible for the detoxification of several substances potentially harmful to the human body, such as air pollution, drugs, pesticides, and tobacco. However, some individuals may present a complete deletion of these genes and, consequently, an enzyme deficiency leading to an inadequate metabolism and, therefore, a higher susceptibility to some clinical conditions. Interethnic variations have also been described for both genes, making necessary the study of the deletion frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in different populations around the world. So, the aim of this study was to enable the synthesis and discussion of the main population differences of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in healthy volunteers. Searches were performed in the PubMed database, including 533 articles and 178,566 individuals in the analyses. We found an overrepresentation of European individuals and studies, and an underrepresentation of non-European ethnicities. Moreover, there are significant frequency differences among distinct ethnic groups: East Asians present the highest frequencies worldwide for GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions, which could suggest higher disorders risk for this population; in contrast, Sub-Saharan Africans presented the lowest frequency of GSTM1 worldwide, corroborating evolution inferences performed previously for other genes codifying metabolism enzymes. Also, admixture is a relevant component when analyzing frequency values for both genes, but further studies focusing on this subject are warranted.

Combined GSTT1 Null, GSTM1 Null and XPD Lys/Lys Genetic Polymorphisms and Their Association with Increased Risk of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Purpose

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTT1 and GSTM1) are instrumental in detoxification process of activated carcinogens. Nucleotide excision repair is carried out by DNA helicase encoded by xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) genes and aberrations in the XPD gene predisposes to increased risk of cancer. The present study aimed to investigate GSTT1, GSTM1 and XPD polymorphisms in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and to examine the association of these polymorphisms with the risk of developing CML.

Patients and Methods

This case–control study was carried out from June 2019 to August 2021 involving 150 newly diagnosed patients with CML and an equal number of randomly selected age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. A multiplex-PCR assay was used to genotype GSTT1 null and GSTM1 null polymorphisms. XPD gene polymorphism was detected by PCR-RFLP using predesigned gene-specific primers.

Results

GSTT1 and GSTM1 null polymorphisms were detected in 42.7% and 61.3% of cases, respectively, compared to 18% and 35.3% for controls. The combination of both GST null polymorphisms revealed a significant association with CML. Frequencies of XPD Lys751Gln genotypes in cases were 62.7% heterozygous Lys/Gln, 24% homozygous Lys/Lys and 13.3% homozygous Gln/Gln, while in the controls were 74.7%, 20%, and 5.3%, respectively. Significant differences were also noted regarding the combination of GSTT1/GSTM1 null with XPD Lys/Lys, and GSTM1 null with XPD Lys/Lys.

Conclusion

In conclusion, GSTT1 null, GSTM1 null and XPD polymorphisms showed positive association with the risk of development of CML. Furthermore, age and gender did not exhibit any association with the studied polymorphisms, while CML phases were associated with GSTT1 null polymorphism.

Association of SLC22A1,SLCO1B3 Drug Transporter Polymorphisms and Smoking with Disease Risk and Cytogenetic Response to Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether polymorphisms of SLC22A1 and SLCO1B3 genes could predict imatinib (IM) response and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) risk.

METHODS

We genotyped SLC22A1 (c.480G > C, c.1222A > G) and SLCO1B3 (c.334T > G, c.699G > A) polymorphisms in 132 patients with CML and 109 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects. The patients were evaluated for cytogenetic response by standard chromosome banding analysis (CBA).

RESULTS

Polymorphism analysis showed significant increased risk of IM resistance for SLC22A1c.1222AG (P = .03; OR = 2.2), SLCO1B3c.334TT/TG genotypes (P = .007; OR = 4.37) and 334T allele (P = .03; OR = 2.86). The double combinations of SLC22A1c.480CC and c.1222AG polymorphisms with SLCO1B3c.334TT/TG were significantly associated with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) (P <.05; OR> 7). The interaction between all polymorphisms and smoking were associated with CML development and IM resistance (P ≤.04; OR> 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results suggest the influence of SLC22A1 and SLCO1B3 polymorphisms and the interaction of smoking on CML development and IM response.

Influence of genetic polymorphisms in glutathione-S-transferases gene in response to imatinib among Brazilian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Polymorphism in metabolizing enzymes can influence drug response as well as the risk for adverse drug reactions. Nevertheless, there are still few studies analyzing the consequence of polymorphisms for the Glutathione-S-transferases (GST) gene to drug response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study reports, the influence of GSTP1*B and GSTT1/GSTM1null polymorphisms in response to imatinib in CML patients in a Brazilian population. One hundred thirty-nine CML patients from the Clinical Hospital of Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, treated with imatinib were enrolled in this study. Genotyping of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes deletions were performed by qPCR and of GSTP1 gene was performed by RFLP-PCR. The frequency of GSTP1*1B, GSTT1 and GSTM1null polymorphisms were determined for all patients. The influence of each patient's genotypes was analyzed with the patient's response to imatinib treatment. Brazilian CML patients revealed GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes deletions. GSTT1 deletion was found in 19.3% of patients and GSTM1 deletion in 48.7% of patients with CML. GSTT1/GSTM1 deletion was found in 11.7% in Brazilian CML patients. The "G allele" of GSTP1*B, is associated with later cytogenetic response in imatinib therapy. While, the gene presence combined with GG genotype (GSTM1 present/GSTPI-GG) conferred a tend to a later cytogenetic response to patients. GSTP1*B and GSTT1/GSTM1null polymorphisms influence treatment response in CML. Brazilian CML patients presenting GSTP1 AA/AG genotypes alone and in combination with GSTT1 null reach the cytogenetic response faster, while patients presenting GSTP1-GG and GSTMI positive genotypes may take longer to achieve cytogenetic response. As a result, it allows a better prognosis, with the use of an alternative therapy, other than reducing treatment cost.

Association Between Glutathione-S-Transferase Gene Polymorphisms and Responses to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although many earlier studies revealed an effect of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) gene polymorphisms on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment responses in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, the significance of this relationship remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review and meta-analyze treatment responses to TKIs in patients with CML and GST gene polymorphisms, including GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched four medical databases, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase, by using keywords related to GST gene polymorphisms and clinical responses in CML patients receiving TKI treatment. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.3 and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3.0. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to examine the association between GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and TKI treatment responses in patients with CML.

RESULTS

The null polymorphisms of GSTT1 and GSTM1 did not affect TKI treatment responses, while the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism had a significant impact on responses to TKI. Patients who were GSTP1 variant allele carriers (AG + GG) had poor responses to TKI treatment compared to patients who were wild-type homozygote carriers (AA) (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.31-2.62; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of patients with CML showed that G allele carriers with GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism had significantly worse responses to TKI treatment than wild-type homozygote carriers.

Glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphic sequence variations: Association with risk and response to Imatinib among Chronic Myeloid Leukemia patients of Kashmir

INTRODUCTION

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene deletion or polymorphic sequence variations lead to decreased enzyme activity that influences susceptibility and response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We aimed to analyze relation of different GST gene sequence variants with susceptibility and response to Imatinib in CML.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 150 CML cases and equal number of age and gender matched healthy controls were genotyped for five GST polymorphisms by multiplex-PCR and PCR-RFLP techniques. BCR-ABL1 transcripts were quantified by quantitative Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR).

RESULTS

GSTT1, GSTO1, and GSTO2 SNPs revealed no association, while as GSTM1_null genotype was observed to protect against the development of CML (OR = 0.53, P = .01). GSTP1 variant genotypes AG (OR = 2.1, P = .003) and GG (OR = 5.6, P < .001), significantly associated with increased risk of CML. Combined genotype analysis showed protective impact of GSTT1_present /GSTM1_null (OR = 0.44, P = .003) while as GSTT1_present /GSTP1-GG (OR = 6.92, P < .001) and GSTM1_present /GSTP1-GG (OR = 6.33, P < .001), significantly increased CML risk. GSTM1_null genotype individually and in combination with GSTT1_present associated with superior rate of major molecular response (MMR) and event free survival (EFS) (log-rank P = .029). GSTO2-AG+GG genotype associated with significantly inferior MMR rates at 3, 6, and 12 months. Also, patients with GSTO2-GG genotype showed significantly reduced EFS (log-rank P = .025). Multivariate analysis confirmed GSTM1_null as a better (HR:0.19, P = .029) and GSTO2-GG genotype as an independent poor prognostic factor (HR:2.29, P = .037).

CONCLUSION

GSTM1_null genotype seems to have a better prognostic role while GSTP1 variants significantly increase CML risk. Also, results support a correlation between disease outcome and GSTO2 polymorphism.

Impact of ABCB1 Gene Polymorphisms and Smoking on the Susceptibility Risk of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Cytogenetic Response

Background:

IM, a strong and selective TKI, has been approved as the front line of treatment in CML patients. In spite of satisfactory results of imatinib in the treatment of patients with CML, patients with treatment failure or suboptimal response developed resistance that might be because of pharmacogenetic variants. This study attempted to evaluate the influence of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and smoking on CML risk and resistance to imatinib.

Methods:

ABCB1 (c.1236C>T, c.3435C>T) polymorphisms were genotyped in 98 CML patients and 100 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects by PCR-RFLP method, followed by sequencing. The patients were evaluated for cytogenetic response by the standard chromosome banding analysis in regular intervals.

Results:

Our results showed that c.1236CC genotype was significantly associated with imatinib resistance (OR = 3.94; p = 0.038). Analysis of the joint of SNP-smoking combination showed that smokers with c.1236TT/CT and c.1236CC genotypes had the increased risk of CML (OR = 6.04; p = 0.00 and OR = 4.95, p = 0.005) and treatment failure (OR = 5.36, p = 0.001 and OR = 15.7, p = 0.002), respectively. Smokers with c.3435TT/CT and c.3435CC genotypes also displayed the elevated risk of CML development (OR = 6.01, p = 0 and OR = 4.36, p = 0.011) and IM resistance (OR = 5.61, p = 0.001 and OR = 13.58, p = 0.002), respectively.

Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that c.1236CC genotype has clinical importance in the prediction of treatment outcome with IM, and smoking could have a synergistic role in CML risk and IM resistance.

Genetic variants in xenobiotic detoxification enzymes, antioxidant defenses and hormonal pathways as biomarkers of susceptibility to prostate cancer

Cancer is considered a complex disease that in many cases results from the interaction between chemical exposures, either from environmental or dietary sources, and genetic polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes (XME) or antioxidant enzymatic defenses. This study explored associations and interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors on the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in 323 subjects that underwent prostate biopsy due to prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels above 4 ng/ml (161 PCa and 162 non-PCa). Eleven genes involved directly or indirectly in xenobiotic detoxification, oxidative stress and estrogen signaling were studied (GSTM1, GPX1 (rs1050450 and rs17650792), NAT2 (rs1801280), TXNRD1 (rs7310505), PRDX3 (rs3740562), CYP17A1 (rs743572), PON1 (rs662), SOD1 (rs10432782), SOD2 (rs4880), CAT (rs1001179), and ESR1 (rs746432)). A structured questionnaire was administered to all individuals to assess environmental and dietary chemical exposures. Medical data was collected by urologists. GPX1 rs17650792 polymorphism was the only one showing a significant inverse association with PCa risk. PRDX3 and GPX1 (rs17650792) genetic polymorphisms were significantly associated with Gleason score and PSA levels, respectively. The intake of nuts and soya products was associated with a reduced risk of PCa, as well as the performance of physical activity. Moreover, a number of gene-environmental interactions were found to increase the risk of PCa, particularly exposure to pesticides and rs1801280 (NAT2) and tobacco smoking and rs1050450 (GPX1). These findings suggest that the association of genetic and environmental risk factors with PCa risk should be assessed jointly for a better understanding of this complex disease.

Genetic Polymorphism of GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 Genes and Susceptibility to Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

BACKGROUND

The development of cancer results from an imbalance between exposure to carcinogens and the capacity of various enzyme systems engaged in activation or in the detoxification of xenobiotics. The aim of the present study is to investigate the association of GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML).

METHODS

A total of 200 CML patients and 100 controls were enrolled in a case-control study with GSTM1 and GSTT1 analysis with PCR and GSTP1 analysis with PCR-RFLP.

RESULTS

The GSTT1 null genotype was significantly higher among CML patients suggesting that this genotype is associated with an increased risk of CML. It was found in 42% of cases as compared with 21% of the controls, (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.59 - 4.85; p-value =0.000). The presence of the GSTT1 genotype may thus be considered a protective factor for CML. The frequency of individuals carrying GSTM1 null genotype was slightly higher in the control group but this difference was not statistically significant. The GSTM1 null genotype was present in 35% of control cases and 34% of the CML patients, (OR=0.975, 95%CI: 0.58-1.58;p-value=0.863). Individuals with a combined GSTM1 null/GSTT1null genotype had an estimated 2.85-fold increased risk of CML, but no associated risk between GSTP1 Ile 105 Val polymorphism and CML was found (OR=1.99, 95% CI: 0.40 - 9.32; p-value = 0.417).

CONCLUSIONS

No association between GSTP1 and GSTM1 with susceptibility to CML was found. GSTT1 genotype may be a protective factor for CML, while the null genotype shows association with developing CML.<br />.

Evaluation and characterisation of Chronic myeloid leukemia and various treatments in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal BCR-ABL1-positive myelo-proliferative disorder resulting from an acquired genetic mutation, characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. CML is associated with significantly high granulocyte numbers in the bone marrow and peripheral blood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study conducted at the Hematology Unit of King Saud University Medical City aimed to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of CML and the various treatments in Saudi Arabia. We have evaluated the demographic, clinical, and hematological data of 56 consecutive patients who visited the hospital from Jan 2012 to Jan 2018.

RESULTS

The diagnosis and stage of CML were determined based on the World Health Organization criteria, following polymerase chain reaction analysis of bone marrow aspirates. Our study group had equal numbers of genders with a age mean of 43.3+18.1 years. The predominance of younger patients and equal incidence in males and females could be due to the racial and socioeconomic disparities among our patients compared to those in previous studies. While the most predominant symptom was fatigue and bone pain, the most common clinical sign was hepato-splenomegaly, followed by remarkable weight loss, and epistaxis.

CONCLUSION

A patient with an increased WBC count, abdominal pain, left side distension, and hepato-splenomegaly should clearly be evaluated for CML.

Association Between Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) Polymorphisms and Schizophrenia in a Chinese Han Population

BACKGROUND

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) is an important antioxidant enzyme in the body. The weakening of the antioxidant system causes damage to the cells and tissues that make up the organism, adversely affects the function of the nervous system, and ultimately leads to schizophrenia (SCZ). Previous studies have yielded inconsistent results across different ethnic populations.

PURPOSE

This case-control study was carried out to investigate whether genetic polymorphisms in GST could be associated with SCZ in the Chinese Han population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 794 participants, including 379 SCZ patients (case group) and 415 healthy individuals (control group), were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length for polymorphisms in GST genes.

RESULTS

The study found that the frequency of the GSTM1 null genotype was higher in case group than control group (p=0.003). The frequency of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 double null genotype was also higher in case group than control group (p=0.008).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the GSTM1 null genotype and the GSTM1 and GSTT1 double null genotype may be related to the onset of SCZ in Chinese Han population.

Influence of glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1) genetic polymorphisms and smoking on susceptibility risk of chronic myeloid leukemia and treatment response

Background

Glutathione S‐transferases (GSTs) polymorphisms may impact on chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) risk or heterogeneous responses to Imatinib mesylate (IM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between GSTs polymorphisms and CML risk, treatment response.

Methods

We genotyped GSTM1, GSTT1 null deletion polymorphisms, and GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism by PCR methods and BCR‐ABL transcripts were analyzed by qRT‐PCR in 104 CML patients and 104 sex‐ and age‐matched healthy individuals.

Results

Individual analysis showed significant association of GSTM1 (p = 0.008; OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26–0.82) and GSTP1 genes (p = 0.04; OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.016–2.423) with CML risk. The combined analysis indicated that GSTM1 null/GSTT1 present, GSTM1‐null/GSTP1M*(AG/GG) as well as GSTT1 present/ GSTP1M* genotype were associated with CML risk (ORg(‐):2.28; 95% CI: 1.29–4.04; ORgg: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.36–5.97; OR(‐)g: 1.75; 95% CI: 0.99–3.06, respectively). The proportion of CML cancer attributable to the interaction of smoking and GSTM1 null, GSTT1null, and GSTP1 M* was 42%, 39%, and 13%, respectively. Patients with GSTM1‐null and GSTP1 AG/GG genotype had significantly a lower rate of MMR achievement (p = 0.00; p = 0.009 respectively). Event‐free survival (EFS) percentage was similar between GSTM1 null and GSTM1 present patients (p = 0.21).

Conclusion

Our study suggests the influence of GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms on CML risk and treatment response. The interaction between GSTs polymorphisms and smoking plays a significant role on CML susceptibility.