Penalized maximum likelihood simultaneous longitudinal PET image reconstruction with difference-image priors

Longitudinal amyloid and tau PET imaging in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of methodologies and factors affecting quantification

Deposition of amyloid and tau pathology can be quantified in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET). Accurate longitudinal measurements of accumulation from these images are critical for characterizing the start and spread of the disease. However, these measurements are challenging; precision and accuracy can be affected substantially by various sources of errors and variability. This review, supported by a systematic search of the literature, summarizes the current design and methodologies of longitudinal PET studies. Intrinsic, biological causes of variability of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) protein load over time are then detailed. Technical factors contributing to longitudinal PET measurement uncertainty are highlighted, followed by suggestions for mitigating these factors, including possible techniques that leverage shared information between serial scans. Controlling for intrinsic variability and reducing measurement uncertainty in longitudinal PET pipelines will provide more accurate and precise markers of disease evolution, improve clinical trial design, and aid therapy response monitoring.

Aiming for [18F]FDG-PET acquisition time reduction in clinical practice for neurological patients

PURPOSE

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [18F]FDG provides valuable information regarding the underlying pathological processes in neurodegenerative disorders. PET imaging for these populations should be as short as possible to limit head movements and improve comfort. This study aimed to validate an optimized [18F]FDG-PET image reconstruction protocol aiming to reduce acquisition time while maintaining adequate quantification accuracy and image quality.

METHODS

A time-reduced reconstruction protocol (5 min) was evaluated in [18F]FDG-PET retrospective data from healthy individuals and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Standard (8 min) and time-reduced protocols were compared by means of image quality and quantification accuracy metrics, as well as standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) and Z-scores (pons was used as reference). Images were randomly and blindly presented to experienced physicians and scored in terms of image quality.

RESULTS

No differences between protocols were identified during the visual assessment. Small differences (p < 0.01) in the pons SUVR were observed between the standard and time-reduced protocols for healthy individuals (-0.002 ± 0.011) and AD patients (-0.007 ± 0.013). Likewise, incorporating the PSF correction in the reconstruction algorithm resulted in small differences (p < 0.01) in SUVR between protocols (healthy individuals: -0.003 ± 0.011; AD patients: -0.007 ± 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Quality metrics were similar between time-reduced and standard protocols. In the visual assessment of the images, the physicians did not consider the use of PSF adequate, as it degraded the quality image. Shortening the acquisition time is possible by optimizing the image reconstruction parameters while maintaining adequate quantification accuracy and image quality.

Machine Learning in PET: from Photon Detection to Quantitative Image Reconstruction

Machine learning has found unique applications in nuclear medicine from photon detection to quantitative image reconstruction. While there have been impressive strides in detector development for time-of-flight positron emission tomography, most detectors still make use of simple signal processing methods to extract the time and position information from the detector signals. Now with the availability of fast waveform digitizers, machine learning techniques have been applied to estimate the position and arrival time of high-energy photons. In quantitative image reconstruction, machine learning has been used to estimate various corrections factors, including scattered events and attenuation images, as well as to reduce statistical noise in reconstructed images. Here machine learning either provides a faster alternative to an existing time-consuming computation, such as in the case of scatter estimation, or creates a data-driven approach to map an implicitly defined function, such as in the case of estimating the attenuation map for PET/MR scans. In this article, we will review the abovementioned applications of machine learning in nuclear medicine.

Intercomparison of MR-informed PET image reconstruction methods

PURPOSE

Numerous image reconstruction methodologies for positron emission tomography (PET) have been developed that incorporate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging structural information, producing reconstructed images with improved suppression of noise and reduced partial volume effects. However, the influence of MR structural information also increases the possibility of suppression or bias of structures present only in the PET data (PET-unique regions). To address this, further developments for MR-informed methods have been proposed, for example, through inclusion of the current reconstructed PET image, alongside the MR image, in the iterative reconstruction process. In this present work, a number of kernel and maximum a posteriori (MAP) methodologies are compared, with the aim of identifying methods that enable a favorable trade-off between the suppression of noise and the retention of unique features present in the PET data.

METHODS

The reconstruction methods investigated were: the MR-informed conventional and spatially compact kernel methods, referred to as KEM and KEM largest value sparsification (LVS) respectively; the MR-informed Bowsher and Gaussian MR-guided MAP methods; and the PET-MR-informed hybrid kernel and anato-functional MAP methods. The trade-off between improving the reconstruction of the whole brain region and the PET-unique regions was investigated for all methods in comparison with postsmoothed maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM), evaluated in terms of structural similarity index (SSIM), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), bias, and standard deviation. Both simulated BrainWeb (10 noise realizations) and real [18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) three-dimensional datasets were used. The real [18 F]FDG dataset was augmented with simulated tumors to allow comparison of the reconstruction methodologies for the case of known regions of PET-MR discrepancy and evaluated at full counts (100%) and at a reduced (10%) count level.

RESULTS

For the high-count simulated and real data studies, the anato-functional MAP method performed better than the other methods under investigation (MR-informed, PET-MR-informed and postsmoothed MLEM), in terms of achieving the best trade-off for the reconstruction of the whole brain and PET-unique regions, assessed in terms of the SSIM, NRMSE, and bias vs standard deviation. The inclusion of PET information in the anato-functional MAP method enables the reconstruction of PET-unique regions to attain similarly low levels of bias as unsmoothed MLEM, while moderately improving the whole brain image quality for low levels of regularization. However, for low count simulated datasets the anato-functional MAP method performs poorly, due to the inclusion of noisy PET information in the regularization term. For the low counts simulated dataset, KEM LVS and to a lesser extent, HKEM performed better than the other methods under investigation in terms of achieving the best trade-off for the reconstruction of the whole brain and PET-unique regions, assessed in terms of the SSIM, NRMSE, and bias vs standard deviation.

CONCLUSION

For the reconstruction of noisy data, multiple MR-informed methods produce favorable whole brain vs PET-unique region trade-off in terms of the image quality metrics of SSIM and NRMSE, comfortably outperforming the whole image denoising of postsmoothed MLEM.