1
|
Sait AA, Yoganathan SA, Jones GW, Patel T, Rastogi N, Pandey SP, Mani S, Boopathy R. Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:055001. [PMID: 38906125 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad5a9e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification.Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 × 10 cm2, 5 × 5 cm2, 4 × 4 cm2, 3 × 3 cm2, 2 × 2 cm2, 1 × 1 cm2, 0.5 × 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines.Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%.Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Aziz Sait
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India
| | - S A Yoganathan
- Radiation Oncology, NCCCR, Hamad Medical Corporation Doha, Qatar
| | - Glenn W Jones
- University of West Indies, School of Clinical Medicine and Research, Nassau, The Bahamas
| | - Tusar Patel
- Department of Medical Physics, Advanced Medical Physics, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Nikhil Rastogi
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India
| | - S P Pandey
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India
- Delhi Technical Campus, Knowledge Park-III, Greater Noida (UP), India
| | - Sunil Mani
- Department of Medical Physics, Advanced Medical Physics, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Raghavendiran Boopathy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, OK, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saße K, Albers K, Klassen PD, Marianyagam NJ, Weidlich G, Schneider MB, Chang S, Adler J, Poppe B, Looe HK, Eulenstein D. Experimental and Monte Carlo based dosimetric investigation of a novel 3 mm radiosurgery 3 MV beam using the microSilicon detector. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14388. [PMID: 38762906 PMCID: PMC11163500 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ZAP-X system is a novel gyroscopic radiosurgical system based on a 3 MV linear accelerator and collimator cones with a diameter between 4 and 25 mm. Advances in imaging modalities to detect small and early-stage pathologies allow for an early and less invasive treatment, where a smaller collimator matching the anatomical target could provide better sparing of surrounding healthy tissue. PURPOSE A novel 3 mm collimator cone for the ZAP-X was developed. This study aims to investigate the usability of a commercial diode detector (microSilicon) for the dosimetric characterization of this small collimator cone; and to investigate the underlying small field perturbation effects. METHODS Profile measurements in five depths as well as PDD and output ratio measurements were performed with a microSilicon detector and radiochromic EBT3 films. In addition, comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations were performed to validate the measurement observations and to quantify the perturbation effects of the microSilicon detector in these extremely small field conditions. RESULTS It is shown that the microSilicon detector enables an accurate dosimetric characterization of the 3 mm beam. The profile parameters, such as the FWHM and 20%-80% penumbra width, agree within 0.1 to 0.2 mm between film and detector measurements. The output ratios agree within the measurement uncertainty between microSilicon detector and films, whereas the comparisons of the PDD results show good agreement with the Monte Carlo simulations. The analysis of the perturbation factors of the microSilicon detector reveals a small field correction factor of approximately 3% for the 3 mm circular beam and a correction factor smaller than 1.5% for field diameters above 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS It could be shown that the microSilicon detector is well-suitable for the characterization of the new 3 mm circular beam of the ZAP-X system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Saße
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius HospitalCarl von Ossietzky UniversityOldenburgGermany
| | - Karina Albers
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius HospitalCarl von Ossietzky UniversityOldenburgGermany
| | | | - Neelan J. Marianyagam
- Department of NeurosurgeryStanford University School of MedicinePalo AltoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Steven Chang
- Department of NeurosurgeryStanford University School of MedicinePalo AltoCaliforniaUSA
| | - John Adler
- ZAP Surgical SystemsSan CarlosCaliforniaUSA
| | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius HospitalCarl von Ossietzky UniversityOldenburgGermany
| | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius HospitalCarl von Ossietzky UniversityOldenburgGermany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perrett B, Seshadri V, Huxley C, Kumar S, Wawrzak M, Ramachandran P. Evaluation of radiation detectors for the determination of field output factors in Leksell Gamma Knife dosimetry using 3D printed phantom inserts. Phys Med 2024; 121:103370. [PMID: 38677196 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The Leksell Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ and Icon™ have a unique geometry, containing 192 60Co sources with collimation for field sizes of 4 mm, 8 mm, and 16 mm. 4 mm and 8 mm collimated fields lack lateral charged particle equilibrium, so accurate field output factors are essential. This study performs field output factor measurements for the microDiamond, microSilicon, and RAZOR™ Nano detectors. 3D printed inserts for the spherical Solid Water® Phantom were fabricated for microDiamond detector, the microSilicon unshielded diode and the RAZOR™ Nano micro-ionisation chamber. Detectors were moved iteratively to identify the peak detector signal for each collimator, representing the effective point of measurement of the chamber. In addition, field output correction factors were calculated for each detector relative to vendor supplied Monte Carlo simulated field output factors and field output factors measured with a W2 scintillator. All field output factors where within 1.1 % for the 4 mm collimator and within 2.3 % for the 8 mm collimator. The 3D printed phantom inserts were suitable for routine measurements if the user identifies the effective point of measurement, and ensures a reproducible setup by marking the rotational alignment of the cylindrical print. Measurements with the microDiamond and microSilicon can be performed faster compared to the RAZOR™ Nano due to differences in the signal to noise ratio. All detectors are suitable for field output factor measurements for the Leksell Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ and Icon™.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Perrett
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia.
| | - Venkatakrishnan Seshadri
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Cosmo Huxley
- 3DOne Australia Pty Ltd, 30 Nashos Place, Wacol, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Sanjay Kumar
- Elekta Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd, Suite 10.02, 146 Arthur Street, North Sydney, New South Wales 2060, Australia
| | - Michal Wawrzak
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Prabhakar Ramachandran
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fleta C, Pellegrini G, Godignon P, Rodríguez FG, Paz-Martín J, Kranzer R, Schüller A. State-of-the-art silicon carbide diode dosimeters for ultra-high dose-per-pulse radiation at FLASH radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:095013. [PMID: 38530300 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad37eb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective.The successful implementation of FLASH radiotherapy in clinical settings, with typical dose rates >40 Gy s-1, requires accurate real-time dosimetry.Approach.Silicon carbide (SiC) p-n diode dosimeters designed for the stringent requirements of FLASH radiotherapy have been fabricated and characterized in an ultra-high pulse dose rate electron beam. The circular SiC PiN diodes were fabricated at IMB-CNM (CSIC) in 3μm epitaxial 4H-SiC. Their characterization was performed in PTB's ultra-high pulse dose rate reference electron beam. The SiC diode was operated without external bias voltage. The linearity of the diode response was investigated up to doses per pulse (DPP) of 11 Gy and pulse durations ranging from 3 to 0.5μs. Percentage depth dose measurements were performed in ultra-high dose per pulse conditions. The effect of the total accumulated dose of 20 MeV electrons in the SiC diode sensitivity was evaluated. The temperature dependence of the response of the SiC diode was measured in the range 19 °C-38 °C. The temporal response of the diode was compared to the time-resolved beam current during each electron beam pulse. A diamond prototype detector (flashDiamond) and Alanine measurements were used for reference dosimetry.Main results.The SiC diode response was independent both of DPP and of pulse dose rate up to at least 11 Gy per pulse and 4 MGy s-1, respectively, with tolerable deviation for relative dosimetry (<3%). When measuring the percentage depth dose under ultra-high dose rate conditions, the SiC diode performed comparably well to the reference flashDiamond. The sensitivity reduction after 100 kGy accumulated dose was <2%. The SiC diode was able to follow the temporal structure of the 20 MeV electron beam even for irregular pulse estructures. The measured temperature coefficient was (-0.079 ± 0.005)%/°C.Significance.The results of this study demonstrate for the first time the suitability of silicon carbide diodes for relative dosimetry in ultra-high dose rate pulsed electron beams up to a DPP of 11 Gy per pulse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Fleta
- Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona, IMB-CNM (CSIC), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giulio Pellegrini
- Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona, IMB-CNM (CSIC), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Godignon
- Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona, IMB-CNM (CSIC), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Faustino Gómez Rodríguez
- Departamento de Física de Partículas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Laboratorio de Radiofísica, RIAIDT, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - José Paz-Martín
- Departamento de Física de Partículas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Rafael Kranzer
- PTW-Freiburg (R&D), Freiburg 79115, Germany
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26121, Germany
| | - Andreas Schüller
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chea M, Croisé M, Huet C, Bassinet C, Benadjaoud MA, Jenny C. MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:40. [PMID: 38509543 PMCID: PMC10956263 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02431-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess a large panel of MR compatible detectors on the full range of measurements required for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning by using a specific statistical method represented as a continuum of comparison with the Monte Carlo (MC) TPS calculations. This study also describes the commissioning tests and the secondary MC dose calculation validation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Plans were created on the Viewray TPS to generate MC reference data. Absolute dose points, PDD, profiles and output factors were extracted and compared to measurements performed with ten different detectors: PTW 31010, 31021, 31022, Markus 34045 and Exradin A28 MR ionization chambers, SN Edge shielded diode, PTW 60019 microdiamond, PTW 60023 unshielded diode, EBT3 radiochromic films and LiF µcubes. Three commissioning steps consisted in comparison between calculated and measured dose: the beam model validation, the output calibration verification in four different phantoms and the commissioning tests recommended by the IAEA-TECDOC-1583. MAIN RESULTS The symmetry for the high resolution detectors was higher than the TPS data of about 1%. The angular responses of the PTW 60023 and the SN Edge were - 6.6 and - 11.9% compared to the PTW 31010 at 60°. The X/Y-left and the Y-right penumbras measured by the high resolution detectors were in good agreement with the TPS values except for the PTW 60023 for large field sizes. For the 0.84 × 0.83 cm2 field size, the mean deviation to the TPS of the uncorrected OF was - 1.7 ± 1.6% against - 4.0 ± 0.6% for the corrected OF whereas we found - 4.8 ± 0.8% for passive dosimeters. The mean absolute dose deviations to the TPS in different phantoms were 0 ± 0.4%, - 1.2 ± 0.6% and 0.5 ± 1.1% for the PTW 31010, PTW 31021 and Exradin A28 MR respectively. CONCLUSIONS The magnetic field effects on the measurements are considerably reduced at low magnetic field. The PTW 31010 ionization chamber can be used with confidence in different phantoms for commissioning and QA tests requiring absolute dose verifications. For relative measurements, the PTW 60019 presented the best agreement for the full range of field size. For the profile assessment, shielded diodes had a behaviour similar to the PTW 60019 and 60023 while the ionization chambers were the most suitable detectors for the symmetry. The output correction factors published by the IAEA TRS 483 seem to be applicable at low magnetic field pending the publication of new MR specific values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Chea
- Medical Physics Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
| | - Mathilde Croisé
- Medical Physics Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Christelle Huet
- Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE/SDOS/LDRI, 92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Céline Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE/SDOS/LDRI, 92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Mohamed-Amine Benadjaoud
- Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE/SERAMED, 92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Catherine Jenny
- Medical Physics Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Das IJ, Sohn JJ, Lim SN, Sengupta B, Feijoo M, Yadav P. Characteristics of a plastic scintillation detector in photon beam dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14209. [PMID: 37983685 PMCID: PMC10795454 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plastic scintillating detectors (PSD) have gained popularity due to small size and are ideally suited in small-field dosimetry due to no correction needed and hence detector reading can be compared to dose. Likewise, these detectors are active and water equivalent. A new PSD from Blue Physics is characterized in photon beam. PURPOSE Innovation in small-field dosimetry detector has led us to examine Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD) for use in photon beams from linear accelerator. METHODS BP-PSD was acquired and its characteristics were evaluated in photon beams from a Varian TrueBeam. Data were collected in a 3D water tank. Standard parameters; dose, dose rate, energy, angular dependence and temperature dependence were studied. Depth dose, profiles and output in a reference condition as well as small fields were measured. RESULTS BP-PSD is versatile and provides data very similar to an ion chamber when Cerenkov radiation is properly accounted. This device measures data pulse by pulse which very few detectors can perform. The differences between ion chamber data and PSD are < 2% in most cases. The angular dependence is a bit pronounces to 1.5% which is due to PSD housing. Depth dose and profiles are comparable within < 1% to an ion chamber. For small fields this detector provides suitable field output factor compared to other detectors and Monte Carlo (MC) simulated data without any added correction factor. CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of Blue Physics PSD is uniquely suitable in photon beam and more so in small fields. The data are reproducible compared to ion chamber for most parameters and ideally suitable for small-field dosimetry without any correction factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J. Das
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Jooyoung J. Sohn
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Sara N. Lim
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Bishwambhar Sengupta
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Radiation OncologyNorthwest Memorial HospitalNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Younes T, Chatrie F, Zinutti M, Simon L, Fares G, Vieillevigne L. Optimization of the Eclipse TPS beam configuration parameters for small field dosimetry using Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements. Phys Med 2023; 114:103141. [PMID: 37820506 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of tuning the beam configurations parameters on the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm for small fields using Monte Carlo simulations and measurements. METHODS The TrueBeam STx with the high-definition 120 multi-leaf collimator (HD120-MLC) was modeled with Geant4 application for emission tomography (GATE) Monte Carlo platform and validated against measurements. The impact of varying the effective spot size (ESS) and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) on AAA and AXB calculations was carried out for small MLC-fields ranging from 0.5×0.5 cm2 to 3 × 3 cm2. Beam penumbras, field sizes and output factors calculated by AAA and AXB were compared to GATE calculations and measurements. RESULTS The beam penumbra comparisons showed that the best ESS value for AXB was about 1.0 mm in the crossplane direction and 0.5 mm in the inplane direction. By optimizing the ESS values, AXB could provide output factor results almost within 2% of GATE calculations and measurements for fields down to 0.5×0.5 cm2. For AAA, significant output factor differences were observed for all ESS values and tuning the DLG in addition to the ESS optimization resulted in an absorbed dose difference of less than 2.5% for MLC-fields down to 1 × 1 cm2. CONCLUSION By optimizing the ESS values, AXB can achieve accurate output factors in the case of small MLC-fields without the need of DLG tuning. Nevertheless, compromises between the output factor, DLG and ESS values were found necessary for AAA calculations. A MLC model improvement would allow to avoid the complexity related to tuning the configuration parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Younes
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France; Laboratoire de "Mathématiques et Applications", Unité de recherche "Mathématiques et Modélisation", Centre d'analyses et de recherche, Faculté des sciences, Université Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth 1104 2020, Lebanon.
| | - Frédéric Chatrie
- Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Marianne Zinutti
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Luc Simon
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Georges Fares
- Laboratoire de "Mathématiques et Applications", Unité de recherche "Mathématiques et Modélisation", Centre d'analyses et de recherche, Faculté des sciences, Université Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth 1104 2020, Lebanon
| | - Laure Vieillevigne
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Centre de Recherche et de Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR1037 INSERM - Université Toulouse 3 - ERL5294 CNRS, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Renil Mon P, Meena-Devi V, Bhasi S. Monte Carlo modelling and validation of the elekta synergy medical linear accelerator equipped with radiosurgical cones. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15328. [PMID: 37123913 PMCID: PMC10130217 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulations of medical linear accelerator heads help in visualizing the energy spectrum and angular spread of photons and electrons, energy deposition, and scattering from each of the head components. Hence, the purpose of this study was to validate the Monte Carlo model of the Elekta synergy medical linear accelerator equipped with stereotactic radio surgical connical collimators. For this, the Elekta synergy medical linear accelerator was modelled using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. The model results were validated using the measured data. The primary electron beam parameters, beam size, and energy were tuned to match the measured data; a dose profile with a field size of 40 × 40 cm2 and percentage depth dose with a field size of 10 × 10 cm2 were matched during tuning. The validation of the modelled data with the measurement results was performed using gamma analysis, point dose, and field size comparisons. For small radiation fields, relative output factors were also compared. The gamma analysis revealed good agreement between the Monte Carlo modeling results and the measured data. A gamma pass rate of more than 95% was obtained for field sizes of 40 × 40 cm2 to 2 × 2 cm2 with gamma criteria of 1% and 1 mm for the dose difference (DD) and distance to agreement (DTA), respectively; this gamma pass rate was more than 98% for the corresponding values of 2% and 2 mm for the DD and DTA, respectively. A gamma pass rate of more than 99% was obtained for a percentage depth dose with 1 mm and 1% criteria. The field size was also in good agreement with the measurement results, and the maximum deviation observed was 1.1%. The stereotactic cone field also passed this analysis with a gamma pass rate of more than 98% for dose profiles and 99% for the percentage depth dose. The small field output factor exhibited a deviation of 4.3%, 3.4%, and 1.9% for field sizes of 5 mm, 7.5 mm, and 10 mm, respectively. Thus, the Monte Carlo model of the Elekta Linear accelerator was successfully validated. The validation of radio surgical cones passed the analysis in terms of the dose profiles and percentage depth dose. The small field relative output factors exhibited deviations of up to 4.3%, and to resolve this, detector-specific and field-specific correction factors must be derived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P.S. Renil Mon
- Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumarakoil, Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu, India
- Corresponding author.
| | - V.N. Meena-Devi
- Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumarakoil, Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu, India
| | - Saju Bhasi
- Department of Radiation Physics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ding GX, Das IJ. On the field size definition and field output factors in small field dosimetry. Med Phys 2023. [PMID: 36734482 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a major conceptual difference between small-field and large field dosimetry that is, different definition of the field size. The dosimetry protocol IAEA TRS-483 recommends the use of the field size defined by measured dose profiles (full-width half maximum, FWHM) that is significantly different from conventional field size definition by the geometric field opening of MLC/Jaw at the isocenter. The application of the effective field size concept, Sclin , was introduced by Cranmer-Sargison et al. (DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.002) as a reporting mechanism for field output factors of rectangular fields. The study by Das et al. (DOI:10.1002/mp.15624) indicated the limitations of obtaining the field size by experimentally measuring FWHM, for example, the measured FWHM is smaller than beam geometric size, which is contradictory to what is expected as a result of partial occlusion of the primary photon source by the collimating devices. Cranmer-Sargison et al. and Das et al suggested that additional investigations are needed to evaluate its limitations. PURPOSE This study investigates the validity of the field size definition by FWHM and by MLC/Jaw opening and finds the pros and cons between these two methods to resolve the controversial issue. METHODS The FWHM can be obtained by measuring or calculating dose profiles. Using Monte Carlo simulations this study compares the field size obtained by FWHM and by field geometric field opening. The EGSnrc system is used to simulate 6 MV beam to generate square and rectangular fields from 5-30 mm with every possible permutation (keeping one jaw fixed and varying other jaw from 5 to 30 mm). The calculated FWHM and output factors are compared with measurements obtained by a microSilicon detector. RESULTS The results show that field width (FWHM) derived from MC calculations generally agrees with machine geometric field width within 0.5 mm for square or rectangular fields with a minimum field width of ≥8 mm. For the extremely small fields with a minimum field width of 5 mm the discrepancies are up to 1.6 mm. The field width (FWHM) obtained by measuring dose profiles are unreliable for small fields due to the measurement uncertainties for an extremely small field. The effect of partial occlusion of the primary photon source by the jaws on the beam axis is clearly observed in the calculated dose profiles. For the extremely small field width of 5 mm, Monte Carlo predicted up to 10% exchange factor differences which are confirmed by the measurements. CONCLUSION The field size defined by the geometric opening of the beam-defining system, is still valid for small fields. The field size defined by geometric opening is independent of measurement uncertainties, independent of machine design, and highly reproducible. It is feasible to accurately tabulate the output factors as a function of geometric field opening thus eliminating user and detector choice for FWHM measurements. The field output factor of a small rectangular field cannot be related to an equivalent field size without considering the exchange factor due to partial occlusion of the photon source.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lechner W, Alfonso R, Arib M, Huq MS, Ismail A, Kinhikar R, Lárraga-Gutiérrez JM, Mani KR, Maphumulo N, Sauer OA, Shoeir S, Suriyapee S, Christaki K. A multi-institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS-483. Med Phys 2022; 49:5537-5550. [PMID: 35717637 PMCID: PMC9541513 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). Materials and methods Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. Results The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. Conclusion Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Lechner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Rodolfo Alfonso
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Higher Institute of Technology and Applied Sciences, University of Havana, Havana, 10400, Cuba
| | - Mehenna Arib
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anas Ismail
- Protection and Safety Department, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, Damascus, PO Box 6091, Syria
| | - Rajesh Kinhikar
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India 400012 & Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400094, India
| | - José M Lárraga-Gutiérrez
- Laboratorio de Física-Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CDMX, México
| | - Karthick Raj Mani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, United Hospital Ltd., Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
- Radiation Dosimetry Section, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Sivalee Suriyapee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
McGrath AN, Golmakani S, Williams TJ. Determination of correction factors in small MLC-defined fields for the Razor and microSilicon diode detectors and evaluation of the suitability of the IAEA TRS-483 protocol for multiple detectors. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13657. [PMID: 35652320 PMCID: PMC9278669 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Small field output factors for Multileaf collimator (MLC)‐defined field sizes between 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 and 3 × 3 cm2 were measured with six different detectors for a Varian TrueBeam in 6‐MV, 6‐FFF, 10‐MV, and 10‐FFF photon beams. Correction factors kQclin,Qreffclin,fref from the IAEA publication TRS‐483 were used to correct the measured output factors. The corrected output factors from the six detectors were used to calculate correction factors for the PTW microSilicon T60023 (PTW, Freiburg, Germany) and IBA Razor (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) detectors. The uncertainty of the output and correction factors in this study was calculated and the calculations presented in detail. The application of the TRS‐483 correction factors significantly reduced the variation in output factors between the various detectors, with the exception of the PTW 60016 diode in 6‐MV and 6‐FFF beams, and the IBA PFD in 10‐MV and 10‐FFF beams. Correction factors calculated for the Razor agreed within 2.9% of existing literature for all energies, while the microSilicon correction factors agreed within 1.6% to the literature for 6‐MV beams. The uncertainty in the microSilicon and Razor correction factors was calculated to be less than 0.9% (k = 1). This study shows that TRS‐483 correction factors reduce the variation in output factors between the detectors used in this study and presents a suitable method for determining correction factors for detectors with unpublished values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew N McGrath
- W.P. Holman Clinic, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Samane Golmakani
- W.P. Holman Clinic, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Delbaere A, Younes T, Simon L, Khamphan C, Vieillevigne L. Field output correction factors and electron fluence perturbation of the microSilicon and microSilicon X detectors. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5e5e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to determine field output correction factors
k
Q
clin
,
Q
ref
f
clin
,
f
ref
and electron fluence perturbation for new PTW unshielded microSilicon and shielded microSilicon X detectors. Approach.
k
Q
clin
,
Q
ref
f
clin
,
f
ref
factors were calculated for 6 and 10 MV with and without flattening filter beams delivered by a TrueBeam STx. Correction factors were determined for field sizes ranging from 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 to 3 × 3 cm2 using both experimental and numerical methods. To better understand the underlying physics of their response, total electron (+positron) fluence spectra were scored in the sensitive volume considering the various component-dependent perturbations. Main results. The microSilicon and microSilicon X detectors can be used down to the smallest studied field size by applying corrections factors fulfilling the tolerance of 5% recommended by the IAEA TRS483. Electron fluence perturbation in both microSilicon detectors was greater than that in water but to a lesser extent than their predecessors. The main contribution of the overall perturbation of the detectors comes from the materials surrounding their sensitive volume, especially the epoxy in the case of unshielded diodes and the shielding for shielded diodes. This work demonstrated that the decrease in the density of the epoxy for the microSilicon led to a decrease in the electron fluence perturbation. Significance. A real improvement was observed regarding the design of the microSilicon and microSilicon X detectors compared to their predecessors.
Collapse
|
13
|
Looe HK, Blum I, Schönfeld AB, Tekin T, Delfs B, Poppe B. Model-based machine learning for the recovery of lateral dose profiles of small photon fields in magnetic field. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5bfa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the feasibility to train artificial neural networks (NN) to recover lateral dose profiles from detector measurements in a magnetic field. Approach. A novel framework based on a mathematical convolution model has been proposed to generate measurement-less training dataset. 2D dose deposition kernels and detector lateral fluence response functions of two air-filled ionization chambers and two diode-type detectors have been simulated without magnetic field and for magnetic field B = 0.35 and 1.5 T. Using these convolution kernels, training dataset consisting pairs of dose profiles
D
x
,
y
and signal profiles
M
x
,
y
were computed for a total of 108 2D photon fluence profiles
ψ
(
x
,
y
)
(80% training/20% validation). The NN were tested using three independent datasets, where the second test dataset has been obtained from simulations using realistic phase space files of clinical linear accelerator and the third test dataset was measured at a conventional linac equipped with electromagnets. Main results. The convolution kernels show magnetic field dependence due to the influence of the Lorentz force on the electron transport in the water phantom and detectors. The NN show good performance during training and validation with mean square error reaching a value of 1e-6 or smaller. The corresponding correlation coefficients R reached the value of 1 for all models indicating an excellent agreement between expected
D
x
,
y
and predicted
D
pred
x
,
y
.
The comparisons between
D
x
,
y
and
D
pred
x
,
y
using the three test datasets resulted in gamma indices (1 mm/1% global) <1 for all evaluated data points. Significance. Two verification approaches have been proposed to warrant the mathematical consistencies of the NN outputs. Besides offering a correction strategy not existed so far for relative dosimetry in a magnetic field, this work could help to raise awareness and to improve understanding on the distortion of detector’s signal profiles by a magnetic field.
Collapse
|
14
|
Das IJ, Dogan SK, Gopalakrishnan M, Ding GX, Longo M, Franscescon P. Validity of equivalent square field concept in small field dosimetry. Med Phys 2022; 49:4043-4055. [PMID: 35344220 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The equivalent Square (ES) concept has been used for traditional radiation fields defined by the machine collimating system. For small fields, the concept Sclin was introduced based on measuring dosimetric field width (full-width half maximum, FWHM) of the cardinal axis of the beam profiles. The pros and cons of this concept are evaluated in small fields and compared with the traditional ES using area and perimeter (4A/P) method based on geometric field size settings e.g. light field settings. METHODS One hundred thirty-seven square and rectangular fields from 5-50 mm with every possible permutation (keeping one jaw fixed and varying other jaw from 5 mm to 50 mm) were utilized to measure FWHM for the validation of Sclin . Using a microSilicon detector and a scanning water tank, measurements were performed on an Elekta (Versa) machine with Agility head and a Varian TrueBeam with different MLC/Jaw design to evaluate the Sclin concept and to understand the effect of exchange factor in small fields. Field output factors were also measured for all 137 fields. RESULTS The data fitting for fields ranging from 5-50 mm between the traditional 4A/P method and Sclin shows differences and indicates a linear relationship with distinct separation of slope for Elekta and Varian machines. As Elekta does not have y jaws, the ES based on 4A/P < Sclin but for the Varian linac 4A/P > Sclin for square fields. Our measured data shows that both methods are equally valid but does vary by the machine design. The field output factor is dependent on the elongation factor as well as machine design. For fields with sides ≥10 mm, the exchange factor is nearly identical in both machines with magnitude up to 4% which is close to measurement uncertainty (±3%) but for small fields (<10 mm) the Elekta machine has higher exchange factors compared to the Varian machine. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate that the two concepts for defining equivalent field (Sclin and 4A/P) are equivalent and can be directly related through an empirical equation. This study confirms that 4A/P is still valid for small fields except for very small fields (≤10 mm) where source occlusion is a dominating factor. The Sclin method is potentially sensitive to measurement uncertainty due to measurement of FWHM which is machine, detector and user dependent, while the 4A/P method relies mainly on geometry of the machine and has less dependency on type of machine, detector and user. The exchange factors are comparable for both types of machines. The conclusion is based on data from an Elekta with Agility head and a Varian TrueBeam machine that may have potential for bias due to light field/collimator set up and alignment. Care should be taken in extrapolating these data to any other machine. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Serpil K Dogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Mariaconcetta Longo
- Department of Radiation Oncology Ospedale Di Vicenza, Viale Rodolfi, Vicenza, 36100, Italy
| | - Paolo Franscescon
- Department of Radiation Oncology Ospedale Di Vicenza, Viale Rodolfi, Vicenza, 36100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dosimetric Characterization of Small Radiotherapy Electron Beams Collimated by Circular Applicators with the New Microsilicon Detector. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12020600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
High-energy small electron beams, generated by linear accelerators, are used for radiotherapy of localized superficial tumours. The aim of the present study is to assess the dosimetric performance under small radiation therapy electron beams of the novel PTW microSilicon detector compared to other available dosimeters. Relative dose measurements of circular fields with 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm aperture diameters were performed for electron beams generated by an Elekta Synergy linac, with energy between 4 and 12 MeV. Percentage depth dose, transverse profiles, and output factors, normalized to the 10 × 10 cm2 reference field, were measured. All dosimetric data were collected in a PTW MP3 motorized water phantom, at SSD of 100 cm, by using the novel PTW microSilicon detector. The PTW diode E and the PTW microDiamond were also used in all beam apertures for benchmarking. Data for the biggest field size were also measured by the PTW Advanced Markus ionization chamber. Measurements performed by the microSilicon are in good agreement with the reference values for all the tubular applicators and beam energies within the stated uncertainties. This confirms the reliability of the microSilicon detector for relative dosimetry of small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by circular applicators.
Collapse
|
16
|
Georgiou G, Kumar S, Würfel JU, Gilmore M, Underwood TSA, Rowbottom CG, Fenwick JD. The PTW microSilicon diode: Performance in small 6 and 15 MV photon fields and utility of density compensation. Med Phys 2021; 48:8062-8074. [PMID: 34725831 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We have experimentally and computationally characterized the PTW microSilicon 60023-type diode's performance in 6 and 15 MV photon fields ≥5 × 5 mm2 projected to isocenter. We tested the detector on- and off-axis at 5 and 15 cm depths in water, and investigated whether its response could be improved by including within it a thin airgap. METHODS Experimentally, detector readings were taken in fields generated by a Varian TrueBeam linac and compared with doses-to-water measured using Gafchromic film and ionization chambers. An unmodified 60023-type diode was tested along with detectors modified to include 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mm thick airgaps. Computationally, doses absorbed by water and detectors' sensitive volumes were calculated using the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo radiation transport code. Detector response was characterized using k Q c l i n , 4 cm f c l i n , 4 cm , a factor that corrects for differences in the ratio of dose-to-water to detector reading between small fields and the reference condition, in this study 5 cm deep on-axis in a 4 × 4 cm2 field. RESULTS The greatest errors in measurements of small field doses made using uncorrected readings from the unmodified 60023-type detector were over-responses of 2.6% ± 0.5% and 5.3% ± 2.0% determined computationally and experimentally, relative to the reading-per-dose in the reference field. Corresponding largest errors for the earlier 60017-type detector were 11.9% ± 0.6% and 11.7% ± 1.4% over-responses. Adding even the thinnest, 0.6 mm, airgap to the 60023-type detector over-corrected it, leading to under-responses of up to 4.8% ± 0.6% and 5.0% ± 1.8% determined computationally and experimentally. Further, Monte Carlo calculations indicate that a detector with a 0.3 mm airgap would read correctly to within 1.3% on-axis. The ratio of doses at 15 and 5 cm depths in water in a 6 MV 4 × 4 cm2 field was measured more accurately using the unmodified 60023-type detector than using the 60017-type detector, and was within 0.3% of the ratio measured using an ion chamber. The 60023-type diode's sensitivity also varied negligibly as dose-rate was reduced from 13 to 4 Gy min-1 by decreasing the linac pulse repetition frequency, whereas the sensitivity of the 60017-type detector fell by 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS The 60023-type detector performed well in small fields across a wide range of beam energies, field sizes, depths, and off-axis positions. Its response can potentially be further improved by adding a thin, 0.3 mm, airgap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Georgiou
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Physics, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.,Department of Physics, Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sudhir Kumar
- Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Martyn Gilmore
- Department of Physics, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK
| | - Tracy S A Underwood
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Carl G Rowbottom
- Department of Physics, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.,Department of Physics, Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - John D Fenwick
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Physics, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Blum I, Tekin T, Delfs B, Schönfeld AB, Kapsch RP, Poppe B, Looe HK. The dose response of PTW microDiamond and microSilicon in transverse magnetic field under small field conditions. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34181591 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0f2e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the present work is to investigate the behavior of two diode-type detectors (PTW microDiamond 60019 and PTW microSilicon 60023) in transverse magnetic field under small field conditions. A formalism based on TRS 483 has been proposed serving as the framework for the application of these high-resolution detectors under these conditions. Measurements were performed at the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB, Braunschweig) using a research clinical linear accelerator facility. Quadratic fields corresponding to equivalent square field sizesSbetween 0.63 and 4.27 cm at the depth of measurement were used. The magnetic field strength was varied up to 1.4 T. Experimental results have been complemented with Monte Carlo simulations up to 1.5 T. Detailed simulations were performed to quantify the small field perturbation effects and the influence of detector components on the dose response. The does response of both detectors decreases by up to 10% at 1.5 T in the largest field size investigated. InS = 0.63 cm, this reduction at 1.5 T is only about half of that observed in field sizesS > 2 cm for both detectors. The results of the Monte Carlo simulations show agreement better than 1% for all investigated conditions. Due to normalization at the machine specific reference field, the resulting small field output correction factors for both detectors in magnetic fieldkQclin,QmsrBare smaller than those in the magnetic field-free case, where correction up to 6.2% at 1.5 T is required for the microSilicon in the smallest field size investigated. The volume-averaging effect of both detectors was shown to be nearly independent of the magnetic field. The influence of the enhanced-density components within the detectors has been identified as the major contributors to their behaviors in magnetic field. Nevertheless, the effect becomes weaker with decreasing field size that may be partially attributed to the deficiency of low energy secondary electrons originated from distant locations in small fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Blum
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Tuba Tekin
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Björn Delfs
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Ann-Britt Schönfeld
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | - Björn Poppe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Hui Khee Looe
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Das IJ, Francescon P, Moran JM, Ahnesjö A, Aspradakis MM, Cheng CW, Ding GX, Fenwick JD, Saiful Huq M, Oldham M, Reft CS, Sauer OA. Report of AAPM Task Group 155: Megavoltage photon beam dosimetry in small fields and non-equilibrium conditions. Med Phys 2021; 48:e886-e921. [PMID: 34101836 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Small-field dosimetry used in advance treatment technologies poses challenges due to loss of lateral charged particle equilibrium (LCPE), occlusion of the primary photon source, and the limited choice of suitable radiation detectors. These challenges greatly influence dosimetric accuracy. Many high-profile radiation incidents have demonstrated a poor understanding of appropriate methodology for small-field dosimetry. These incidents are a cause for concern because the use of small fields in various specialized radiation treatment techniques continues to grow rapidly. Reference and relative dosimetry in small and composite fields are the subject of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) dosimetry code of practice that has been published as TRS-483 and an AAPM summary publication (IAEA TRS 483; Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An IAEA/AAPM International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination, Technical Report Series No. 483; Palmans et al., Med Phys 45(11):e1123, 2018). The charge of AAPM task group 155 (TG-155) is to summarize current knowledge on small-field dosimetry and to provide recommendations of best practices for relative dose determination in small megavoltage photon beams. An overview of the issue of LCPE and the changes in photon beam perturbations with decreasing field size is provided. Recommendations are included on appropriate detector systems and measurement methodologies. Existing published data on dosimetric parameters in small photon fields (e.g., percentage depth dose, tissue phantom ratio/tissue maximum ratio, off-axis ratios, and field output factors) together with the necessary perturbation corrections for various detectors are reviewed. A discussion on errors and an uncertainty analysis in measurements is provided. The design of beam models in treatment planning systems to simulate small fields necessitates special attention on the influence of the primary beam source and collimating devices in the computation of energy fluence and dose. The general requirements for fluence and dose calculation engines suitable for modeling dose in small fields are reviewed. Implementations in commercial treatment planning systems vary widely, and the aims of this report are to provide insight for the medical physicist and guidance to developers of beams models for radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Paolo Francescon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Di Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Jean M Moran
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anders Ahnesjö
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria M Aspradakis
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Chee-Wai Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John D Fenwick
- Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark Oldham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chester S Reft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik fur Strahlentherapie, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hachemi T, Chaoui ZEA, Khoudri S. PENELOPE simulations and experiment for 6 MV clinac iX accelerator for standard and small static fields. Appl Radiat Isot 2021; 174:109749. [PMID: 33940355 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this work was to produce accurate data for use as a 'gold standard' and a valid tool for measurements in reference dosimetry for standard/small static field sizes from 0.5 × 0.5 to 10 × 10 cm2. It is based on the accuracy of the phase space files (PSFs) as a key quantity. Because the IAEA general public database provides few PSFs for the Varian iX, we simulated the head through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and calculated validated PSFs for 12 square field sizes including seven for small static fields. The resulting dosimetric calculations allowed us to reach a good level of agreement in comparison to our relative and absolute dose measurements performed on a Varian iX in water phantom. Measured and MC calculated output factors were investigated for different detectors. Based on the TRS 483 formalism and MC (PENELOPE/penEasy), we calculated output correction factors for the unshielded Diode-E (T60017) and the PinPoint-3D (T31016) micro-chamber according to manufacturers' blueprints. Our MC results were in agreement with the recommended data; they compete with recent measurements and MC simulations and in particular the TRS 483 MC data obtained from similar simulations. Moreover, our MC results provide supplemental data in comparison to TRS 483 data in particular for the PinPoint-3D (T31016). We suggest our MC output correction factors as new datasets for future TRS compilations. The work was substantial, used different robust MC strategies depending on the scoring regions, and led in most cases to uncertainties of less than 1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha Hachemi
- Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Devices, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Algeria.
| | - Zine-El-Abidine Chaoui
- Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Devices, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Algeria
| | - Saad Khoudri
- Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Devices, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Algeria; Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer de Sétif, Algeria
| |
Collapse
|