1
|
Srinivasan D, Subbarayan R, Srivastava N, Radhakrishnan A, Adtani PN, Chauhan A, Krishnamoorthy L. A comprehensive overview of radiation therapy impacts of various cancer treatments and pivotal role in the immune system. Cell Biochem Funct 2024; 42:e4103. [PMID: 39073207 DOI: 10.1002/cbf.4103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
The cancer treatment landscape is significantly evolving, focusing on advanced radiation therapy methods to maximize effectiveness and minimize the adverse effects. Recognized as a pivotal component in cancer and disease treatment, radiation therapy (RT) has drawn attention in recent research that delves into its intricate interplay with inflammation and the immune response. This exploration unveils the underlying processes that significantly influence treatment outcomes. In this context, the potential advantages of combining bronchoscopy with RT across diverse clinical scenarios, alongside the targeted impact of brachytherapy, are explored. Concurrently, radiation treatments serve multifaceted roles such as DNA repair, cell elimination, and generating immune stress signaling molecules known as damage-associated molecular patterns, elucidating their effectiveness in treating various diseases. External beam RT introduces versatility by utilizing particles such as photons, electrons, protons, or carbon ions, each offering distinct advantages. Advanced RT techniques contribute to the evolving landscape, with emerging technologies like FLASH, spatially fractionated RT, and others poised to revolutionize the field. The comprehension of RT, striving for improved treatment outcomes, reduced side effects, and facilitating personalized and innovative treatments for cancer and noncancer patients. After navigating these advancements, the goal is fixed to usher in a new era in which RT is a cornerstone of precision and effectiveness in medical interventions. In summarizing the myriad findings, the review underscores the significance of understanding the differential impacts of radiation approaches on inflammation and immune modulation, offering valuable insights for developing innovative therapeutic interventions that harness the immune system in conjunction with RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhasarathdev Srinivasan
- Centre for Advanced Biotherapeutics and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Research, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| | - Rajasekaran Subbarayan
- Centre for Advanced Biotherapeutics and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Research, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| | - Nityanand Srivastava
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Arunkumar Radhakrishnan
- Department of Pharmacology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| | - Pooja Narain Adtani
- Department of Basic Medical and Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ankush Chauhan
- Centre for Herbal Pharmacology and Environmental Sustainability, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| | - Loganathan Krishnamoorthy
- Department of Allied Health Sciences-FAHS, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Portier L, Daira P, Fourmaux B, Heinrich S, Becerra M, Fouillade C, Berthault N, Dutreix M, Londoño-Vallejo A, Verrelle P, Bernoud-Hubac N, Favaudon V. Differential Remodeling of the Oxylipin Pool After FLASH Versus Conventional Dose-Rate Irradiation In Vitro and In Vivo. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1481-1492. [PMID: 38340776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The products of lipid peroxidation have been implicated in human diseases and aging. This prompted us to investigate the response to conventional (CONV) versus FLASH irradiation of oxylipins, a family of bioactive lipid metabolites derived from omega-3 or omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids through oxygen-dependent non-enzymatic as well as dioxygenase-mediated free radical reactions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify the expression of 37 oxylipins derived from eicosatetraenoic, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acid in mouse lung and in normal or cancer cells exposed to either radiation modality under precise monitoring of the temperature and oxygenation. Among the 37 isomers assayed, 14-16 were present in high enough amount to enable quantitative analysis. The endpoints were the expression of oxylipins as a function of the dose of radiation, normoxia versus hypoxia, temperature and post-irradiation time. RESULTS In normal, normoxic cells at 37°C radiation elicited destruction and neosynthesis of oxylipins acting antagonistically on a background subject to rapid remodeling by oxygenases. Neosynthesis was observed in the CONV mode only, in such a way that the level of oxylipins at 5 minutes after FLASH irradiation was 20-50% lower than in non-irradiated and CONV-irradiated cells. Hypoxia mitigated the differential CONV versus FLASH response in some oxylipins. These patterns were not reproduced in tumor cells. Depression of specific oxylipins following FLASH irradiation was observed in mouse lung at 5 min following irradiation, with near complete recovery in 24 hours and further remodeling at one week and two months post-irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Down-regulation of oxylipins was a hallmark of FLASH irradiation specific of normal cells. Temperature effects suggest that this process occurs via diffusion-controlled, bimolecular recombination of a primary radical species upstream from peroxyl radical formation and evoke a major role of the membrane composition and fluidity in response to the FLASH modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Portier
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | - Patricia Daira
- Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS, LaMCoS, UMR 5259, Villeurbanne, France
| | | | - Sophie Heinrich
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | - Margaux Becerra
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | - Charles Fouillade
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | - Nathalie Berthault
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | - Marie Dutreix
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | - Arturo Londoño-Vallejo
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Institut Curie, Hospital Section, Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France; Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1196-CNRS UMR 9187, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France
| | | | - Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Research Division, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, Centre Universitaire CS 90030, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bou-Gharios J, Noël G, Burckel H. Preclinical and clinical advances to overcome hypoxia in glioblastoma multiforme. Cell Death Dis 2024; 15:503. [PMID: 39003252 PMCID: PMC11246422 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-06904-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common adult primary brain tumor. The standard clinical treatment of GBM includes a maximal surgical resection followed by concomitant radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy sessions with Temozolomide (TMZ) in addition to adjuvant TMZ cycles. Despite the severity of this protocol, GBM is highly resistant and recurs in almost all cases while the protocol remains unchanged since 2005. Limited-diffusion or chronic hypoxia has been identified as one of the major key players driving this aggressive phenotype. The presence of hypoxia within the tumor bulk contributes to the activation of hypoxia signaling pathway mediated by the hypoxia-inducing factors (HIFs), which in turn activate biological mechanisms to ensure the adaptation and survival of GBM under limited oxygen and nutrient supply. Activated downstream pathways are involved in maintaining stem cell-like phenotype, inducing mesenchymal shift, invasion, and migration, altering the cellular and oxygen metabolism, and increasing angiogenesis, autophagy, and immunosuppression. Therefore, in this review will discuss the recent preclinical and clinical approaches that aim at targeting tumor hypoxia to enhance the response of GBM to conventional therapies along with their results and limitations upon clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolie Bou-Gharios
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Radiobiology Laboratory, 3 rue de la porte de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
- Laboratory of Engineering, Informatics and Imaging (ICube), Integrative Multimodal Imaging In Healthcare (IMIS), UMR 7357, University of Strasbourg, 4 rue Kirschleger, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Radiobiology Laboratory, 3 rue de la porte de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
- Laboratory of Engineering, Informatics and Imaging (ICube), Integrative Multimodal Imaging In Healthcare (IMIS), UMR 7357, University of Strasbourg, 4 rue Kirschleger, 67000, Strasbourg, France
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Department of Radiation Oncology, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hélène Burckel
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Radiobiology Laboratory, 3 rue de la porte de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
- Laboratory of Engineering, Informatics and Imaging (ICube), Integrative Multimodal Imaging In Healthcare (IMIS), UMR 7357, University of Strasbourg, 4 rue Kirschleger, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ren W, Hou L, Zhang K, Chen H, Feng X, Jiang Z, Shao F, Dai J, Gao Y, He J. The sparing effect of ultra-high dose rate irradiation on the esophagus. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1442627. [PMID: 39070145 PMCID: PMC11272628 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1442627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Current studies have substantiated the sparing effect of ultra-high dose rate irradiation (FLASH) in various organs including the brain, lungs, and intestines. Whether this sparing effect extends to esophageal tissue remains unexplored. This study aims to compare the different responses of esophageal tissue in histological and protein expression levels following conventional dose rate irradiation (CONV) and FLASH irradiation to ascertain the presence of a sparing effect. Methods and materials C57 female mice were randomly divided into three groups: control, CONV, and FLASH groups. The chest region of the mice in the radiation groups was exposed to a prescribed dose of 20 Gy using a modified electron linear accelerator. The CONV group received an average dose rate of 0.1 Gy/s, while the FLASH group received an average dose rate of 125 Gy/s. On the 10th day after irradiation, the mice were euthanized and their esophagi were collected for histopathological analysis. Subsequently, label-free proteomic quantification analysis was performed on esophageal tissue. The validation process involved analyzing transmission electron microscopy images and utilizing the parallel reaction monitoring method. Results Histopathology results indicated a significantly lower extent of esophageal tissue damage in the FLASH group compared to the CONV group (p < 0.05). Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis revealed that the sparing effect observed in the FLASH group may be attributed to a reduction in radiation-induced protein damage associated with mitochondrial functions, including proteins involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation, as well as a decrease in acute inflammatory responses. Conclusions Compared with CONV irradiation, a sparing effect on esophageal tissue can be observed after FLASH irradiation. This sparing effect is associated with alleviated mitochondria damage and acute inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenting Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziming Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Shao
- Laboratory of Translational Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yibo Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Laboratory of Translational Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Central Laboratory and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Epigenetics and Precision Medicine for Cancers, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jie He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chow JCL, Ruda HE. Impact of Scattering Foil Composition on Electron Energy Distribution in a Clinical Linear Accelerator Modified for FLASH Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Study. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 17:3355. [PMID: 38998435 PMCID: PMC11243336 DOI: 10.3390/ma17133355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
This study investigates how scattering foil materials and sampling holder placement affect electron energy distribution in electron beams from a modified medical linear accelerator for FLASH radiotherapy. We analyze electron energy spectra at various positions-ionization chamber, mirror, and jaw-to evaluate the impact of Cu, Pb-Cu, Pb, and Ta foils. Our findings show that close proximity to the source intensifies the dependence of electron energy distribution on foil material, enabling precise beam control through material selection. Monte Carlo simulations are effective for designing foils to achieve desired energy distributions. Moving the sampling holder farther from the source reduces foil material influence, promoting more uniform energy spreads, particularly in the 0.5-10 MeV range for 12 MeV electron beams. These insights emphasize the critical role of tailored material selection and sampling holder positioning in optimizing electron energy distribution and fluence intensity for FLASH radiotherapy research, benefiting both experimental design and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C L Chow
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Harry E Ruda
- Centre of Advance Nanotechnology, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shen H, Wang H, Mo J, Zhang J, Xu C, Sun F, Ou X, Zhu X, Du L, Ju H, Ye R, Shi G, Kwok RT, Lam JW, Sun J, Zhang T, Ning S, Tang BZ. Unrestricted molecular motions enable mild photothermy for recurrence-resistant FLASH antitumor radiotherapy. Bioact Mater 2024; 37:299-312. [PMID: 38694765 PMCID: PMC11061705 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Ultrahigh dose-rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is an emerging technology with excellent therapeutic effects and low biological toxicity. However, tumor recurrence largely impede the effectiveness of FLASH therapy. Overcoming tumor recurrence is crucial for practical FLASH applications. Here, we prepared an agarose-based thermosensitive hydrogel containing a mild photothermal agent (TPE-BBT) and a glutaminase inhibitor (CB-839). Within nanoparticles, TPE-BBT exhibits aggregation-induced emission peaked at 900 nm, while the unrestricted molecular motions endow TPE-BBT with a mild photothermy generation ability. The balanced photothermal effect and photoluminescence are ideal for phototheranostics. Upon 660-nm laser irradiation, the temperature-rising effect softens and hydrolyzes the hydrogel to release TPE-BBT and CB-839 into the tumor site for concurrent mild photothermal therapy and chemotherapy, jointly inhibiting homologous recombination repair of DNA. The enhanced FLASH radiotherapy efficiently kills the tumor tissue without recurrence and obvious systematic toxicity. This work deciphers the unrestricted molecular motions in bright organic fluorophores as a source of photothermy, and provides novel recurrence-resistant radiotherapy without adverse side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanchen Shen
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hongbin Wang
- The Second Ward of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, 150081, China
| | - Jianlan Mo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Jianyu Zhang
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Changhuo Xu
- MOE Frontiers Science Center for Precision Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China
| | - Feiyi Sun
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xinwen Ou
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xinyan Zhu
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Lidong Du
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
- MOE Frontiers Science Center for Precision Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China
| | - Huaqiang Ju
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ruquan Ye
- Department of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Guangfu Shi
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Ryan T.K. Kwok
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jacky W.Y. Lam
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jianwei Sun
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tianfu Zhang
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shipeng Ning
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Ben Zhong Tang
- Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Division of Life Science, and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
- School of Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Institute of Aggregate Science and Technology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK-Shenzhen), Guangdong, 518172, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garibaldi C, Beddar S, Bizzocchi N, Tobias Böhlen T, Iliaskou C, Moeckli R, Psoroulas S, Subiel A, Taylor PA, Van den Heuvel F, Vanreusel V, Verellen D. Minimum and optimal requirements for a safe clinical implementation of ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy: A focus on patient's safety and radiation protection. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110291. [PMID: 38648991 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Garibaldi
- IEO, Unit of Radiation Research, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| | - Sam Beddar
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicola Bizzocchi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charoula Iliaskou
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, 79106, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Serena Psoroulas
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science, Teddington, UK
| | - Paige A Taylor
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frank Van den Heuvel
- Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Institute, Vlissingen, the Netherlands; Dept of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Verdi Vanreusel
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp University (Centre for Oncological Research, CORE), Antwerpen, Belgium; SCK CEN (Research in Dosimetric Applications), Mol, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp University (Centre for Oncological Research, CORE), Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harrison N, Kang M, Liu R, Charyyev S, Wahl N, Liu W, Zhou J, Higgins KA, Simone CB, Bradley JD, Dynan WS, Lin L. A Novel Inverse Algorithm To Solve the Integrated Optimization of Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer of Proton FLASH Therapy With Sparse Filters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:957-967. [PMID: 38104869 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The recently proposed Integrated Physical Optimization Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IPO-IMPT) framework allows simultaneous optimization of dose, dose rate, and linear energy transfer (LET) for ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) treatment planning. Finding solutions to IPO-IMPT is difficult because of computational intensiveness. Nevertheless, an inverse solution that simultaneously specifies the geometry of a sparse filter and weights of a proton intensity map is desirable for both clinical and preclinical applications. Such solutions can reduce effective biologic dose to organs at risk in patients with cancer as well as reduce the number of animal irradiations needed to derive extra biologic dose models in preclinical studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS Unlike the initial forward heuristic, this inverse IPO-IMPT solution includes simultaneous optimization of sparse range compensation, sparse range modulation, and spot intensity. The daunting computational tasks vital to this endeavor were resolved iteratively with a distributed computing framework to enable Simultaneous Intensity and Energy Modulation and Compensation (SIEMAC). SIEMAC was demonstrated on a human patient with central lung cancer and a minipig. RESULTS SIEMAC simultaneously improves maps of spot intensities and patient-field-specific sparse range compensators and range modulators. For the patient with lung cancer, at our maximum nozzle current of 300 nA, dose rate coverage above 100 Gy/s increased from 57% to 96% in the lung and from 93% to 100% in the heart, and LET coverage above 4 keV/µm dropped from 68% to 9% in the lung and from 26% to <1% in the heart. For a simple minipig plan, the full-width half-maximum of the dose, dose rate, and LET distributions decreased by 30%, 1.6%, and 57%, respectively, again with similar target dose coverage, thus reducing uncertainty in these quantities for preclinical studies. CONCLUSIONS The inverse solution to IPO-IMPT demonstrated the capability to simultaneously modulate subspot proton energy and intensity distributions for clinical and preclinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ruirui Liu
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Niklas Wahl
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wei Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jun Zhou
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yan O, Wang S, Wang Q, Wang X. FLASH Radiotherapy: Mechanisms of Biological Effects and the Therapeutic Potential in Cancer. Biomolecules 2024; 14:754. [PMID: 39062469 PMCID: PMC11275005 DOI: 10.3390/biom14070754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an important treatment for many unresectable advanced malignant tumors, and radiotherapy-associated inflammatory reactions to radiation and other toxic side effects are significant reasons which reduce the quality of life and survival of patients. FLASH-radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), a prominent topic in recent radiation therapy research, is an ultra-high dose rate treatment known for significantly reducing therapy time while effectively targeting tumors. This approach minimizes radiation side effects on at-risk organs and maximally protects surrounding healthy tissues. Despite decades of preclinical exploration and some notable achievements, the mechanisms behind FLASH effects remain debated. Standardization is still required for the type of FLASH-RT rays and dose patterns. This review addresses the current state of FLASH-RT research, summarizing the biological mechanisms behind the FLASH effect. Additionally, it examines the impact of FLASH-RT on immune cells, cytokines, and the tumor immune microenvironment. Lastly, this review will discuss beam characteristics, potential clinical applications, and the relevance and applicability of FLASH-RT in treating advanced cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xin Wang
- Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (O.Y.); (S.W.); (Q.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsai P, Yang Y, Wu M, Chen CC, Yu F, Simone CB, Choi JI, Tomé WA, Lin H. A comprehensive pre-clinical treatment quality assurance program using unique spot patterns for proton pencil beam scanning FLASH radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14400. [PMID: 38831639 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality assurance (QA) for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation is a crucial aspect in the emerging field of FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT). This innovative treatment approach delivers radiation at UHDR, demanding careful adoption of QA protocols and procedures. A comprehensive understanding of beam properties and dosimetry consistency is vital to ensure the safe and effective delivery of FLASH-RT. PURPOSE To develop a comprehensive pre-treatment QA program for cyclotron-based proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) FLASH-RT. Establish appropriate tolerances for QA items based on this study's outcomes and TG-224 recommendations. METHODS A 250 MeV proton spot pattern was designed and implemented using UHDR with a 215nA nozzle beam current. The QA pattern that covers a central uniform field area, various spot spacings, spot delivery modes and scanning directions, and enabling the assessment of absolute, relative and temporal dosimetry QA parameters. A strip ionization chamber array (SICA) and an Advanced Markus chamber were utilized in conjunction with a 2 cm polyethylene slab and a range (R80) verification wedge. The data have been monitored for over 3 months. RESULTS The relative dosimetries were compliant with TG-224. The variations of temporal dosimetry for scanning speed, spot dwell time, and spot transition time were within ± 1 mm/ms, ± 0.2 ms, and ± 0.2 ms, respectively. While the beam-to-beam absolute output on the same day reached up to 2.14%, the day-to-day variation was as high as 9.69%. High correlation between the absolute dose and dose rate fluctuations were identified. The dose rate of the central 5 × 5 cm2 field exhibited variations within 5% of the baseline value (155 Gy/s) during an experimental session. CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive QA program for FLASH-RT was developed and effectively assesses the performance of a UHDR delivery system. Establishing tolerances to unify standards and offering direction for future advancements in the evolving FLASH-RT field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yunjie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mengjou Wu
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Francis Yu
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Wolfgang A Tomé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Claessens M, Vanreusel V, Gasparini A, Nascimento LDF, Yalvec B, Reniers B, Verellen D. Automated determination of the ion-recombination correction factor (k sat) in ultra-high dose rate electron radiation therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:4536-4545. [PMID: 38639653 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plane-parallel ionization chambers are the recommended secondary standard systems for clinical reference dosimetry of electrons. Dosimetry in high dose rate and dose-per-pulse (DPP) is challenging as ionization chambers are subject to ion recombination, especially when dose rate and/or DPP is increased beyond the range of conventional radiotherapy. The lack of universally accepted models for correction of ion recombination in UDHR is still an issue as it is, especially in FLASH-RT research, which is crucial in order to be able to accurately measure the dose for a wide range of dose rates and DPPs. PURPOSE The objective of this study was to show the feasibility of developing an Artificial Intelligence model to predict the ion-recombination factor-ksat for a plane-parallel Advanced Markus ionization chamber for conventional and ultra-high dose rate electron beams based on machine parameters. In addition, the predicted ksat of the AI model was compared with the current applied analytical models for this correction factor. METHODS A total number of 425 measurements was collected with a balanced variety in machine parameter settings. The specific ksat values were determined by dividing the output of the reference dosimeter (optically stimulated luminescence [OSL]) by the output of the AM chamber. Subsequently, a XGBoost regression model was trained, which used the different machine parameters as input features and the corresponding ksat value as output. The prediction accuracy of this regression model was characterized by R2-coefficient of determination, mean absolute error and root mean squared error. In addition, the model was compared with the Two-Voltage (TVA) method and empirical Petersson model for 19 different dose-per-pulse values ranging from conventional to UDHR regimes. The Akiake Information criterion (AIC) was calculated for the three different models. RESULTS The XGBoost regression model reached a R2-score of 0.94 on the independent test set with a MAE of 0.067 and RMSE of 0.106. For the additional 19 random data points, the ksat values predicted by the XGBoost model showed to be in agreement, within the uncertainties, with the ones determined by the Petersson model and better than the TVA method for doses per pulse >3.5 Gy with a maximum deviation from the ground truth of 14.2%, 16.7%, and -36.0%, respectively, for DPP >4 Gy. CONCLUSION The proposed method of using AI for ksat determination displays efficiency. For the investigated DPPs, the ksat values obtained with the XGBoost model were in concurrence with the ones obtained with the current available analytical models within the boundaries of uncertainty, certainly for the DPP characterizing UDHR. But the overall performance of the AI model, taking the number of free parameters into account, lacked efficiency. Future research should optimize the determination of the experimental ksat, and investigate the determination the ksat for DPPs higher than the ones investigated in this study, while also evaluating the prediction of the proposed XGBoost model for UDHR machines of different centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Claessens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Verdi Vanreusel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Research in Dosimetric Applications (RDA), SCK CEN, Mol, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alessia Gasparini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Burak Yalvec
- NuTeC, CMK, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chow JCL, Ruda HE. Mechanisms of Action in FLASH Radiotherapy: A Comprehensive Review of Physicochemical and Biological Processes on Cancerous and Normal Cells. Cells 2024; 13:835. [PMID: 38786057 PMCID: PMC11120005 DOI: 10.3390/cells13100835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The advent of FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has brought forth a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, showcasing remarkable normal cell sparing effects with ultra-high dose rates (>40 Gy/s). This review delves into the multifaceted mechanisms underpinning the efficacy of FLASH effect, examining both physicochemical and biological hypotheses in cell biophysics. The physicochemical process encompasses oxygen depletion, reactive oxygen species, and free radical recombination. In parallel, the biological process explores the FLASH effect on the immune system and on blood vessels in treatment sites such as the brain, lung, gastrointestinal tract, skin, and subcutaneous tissue. This review investigated the selective targeting of cancer cells and the modulation of the tumor microenvironment through FLASH-RT. Examining these mechanisms, we explore the implications and challenges of integrating FLASH-RT into cancer treatment. The potential to spare normal cells, boost the immune response, and modify the tumor vasculature offers new therapeutic strategies. Despite progress in understanding FLASH-RT, this review highlights knowledge gaps, emphasizing the need for further research to optimize its clinical applications. The synthesis of physicochemical and biological insights serves as a comprehensive resource for cell biology, molecular biology, and biophysics researchers and clinicians navigating the evolution of FLASH-RT in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C. L. Chow
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Harry E. Ruda
- Centre of Advance Nanotechnology, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada;
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pageot C, Zerouali K, Guillet D, Muir B, Renaud J, Lalonde A. The effect of electron backscatter and charge build up in media on beam current transformer signal for ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) electron beam monitoring. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:105016. [PMID: 38640916 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad40f7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Beam current transformers (BCT) are promising detectors for real-time beam monitoring in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron radiotherapy. However, previous studies have reported a significant sensitivity of the BCT signal to changes in source-to-surface distance (SSD), field size, and phantom material which have until now been attributed to the fluctuating levels of electrons backscattered within the BCT. The purpose of this study is to evaluate this hypothesis, with the goal of understanding and mitigating the variations in BCT signal due to changes in irradiation conditions.Approach.Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements were conducted with a UHDR-capable intra-operative electron linear accelerator to analyze the impact of backscattered electrons on BCT signal. The potential influence of charge accumulation in media as a mechanism affecting BCT signal perturbation was further investigated by examining the effects of phantom conductivity and electrical grounding. Finally, the effectiveness of Faraday shielding to mitigate BCT signal variations is evaluated.Main Results.Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the fraction of electrons backscattered in water and on the collimator plastic at 6 and 9 MeV is lower than 1%, suggesting that backscattered electrons alone cannot account for the observed BCT signal variations. However, our experimental measurements confirmed previous findings of BCT response variation up to 15% for different field diameters. A significant impact of phantom type on BCT response was also observed, with variations in BCT signal as high as 14.1% when comparing measurements in water and solid water. The introduction of a Faraday shield to our applicators effectively mitigated the dependencies of BCT signal on SSD, field size, and phantom material.Significance.Our results indicate that variations in BCT signal as a function of SSD, field size, and phantom material are likely driven by an electric field originating in dielectric materials exposed to the UHDR electron beam. Strategies such as Faraday shielding were shown to effectively prevent these electric fields from affecting BCT signal, enabling reliable BCT-based electron UHDR beam monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Pageot
- École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Karim Zerouali
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Dominique Guillet
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bryan Muir
- National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Arthur Lalonde
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Université de Montréal , Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shiraishi Y, Matsuya Y, Fukunaga H. Reply to comment on 'Modeling for predicting survival fraction of cells after ultra-high dose rate irradiation'. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:108002. [PMID: 38700988 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad3edc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Liew and Mairani commented on our paper 'Modeling for predicting survival fraction of cells after ultra-high dose rate irradiation' (Shiraishiet al2024aPhys. Med. Biol.69015017), which proposed a biophysical model to predict the dose-response curve of surviving cell fractions after ultra-high dose rate irradiation following conventional dose rate irradiation by considering DNA damage yields. They suggested the need to consider oxygen concentration in our prediction model and possible issues related to the data selection process used for the benchmarking test in our paper. In this reply, we discuss the limitations of both the present model and the available experimental data for determining the model's parameters. We also demonstrate that our proposed model can reproduce the experimental survival data even when using only the experimental DNA damage data measured reliably under normoxic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Shiraishi
- Graduate school of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Japan Healthcare University, 3-11-1-50 Tsukisamu-higashi, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 062-0053, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsuya
- Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
- Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 2-4 Shirakata, Tokai, Ibaraki, 319-1195, Japan
| | - Hisanori Fukunaga
- Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Franciosini G, Carlotti D, Cattani F, De Gregorio A, De Liso V, De Rosa F, Di Francesco M, Di Martino F, Felici G, Pensavalle JH, Leonardi MC, Marafini M, Muscato A, Paiar F, Patera V, Poortmans P, Sciubba A, Schiavi A, Toppi M, Traini G, Trigilio A, Sarti A. IOeRT conventional and FLASH treatment planning system implementation exploiting fast GPU Monte Carlo: The case of breast cancer. Phys Med 2024; 121:103346. [PMID: 38608421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Partial breast irradiation for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients can be performed by means of Intra Operative electron Radiation Therapy (IOeRT). One of the main limitations of this technique is the absence of a treatment planning system (TPS) that could greatly help in ensuring a proper coverage of the target volume during irradiation. An IOeRT TPS has been developed using a fast Monte Carlo (MC) and an ultrasound imaging system to provide the best irradiation strategy (electron beam energy, applicator position and bevel angle) and to facilitate the optimisation of dose prescription and delivery to the target volume while maximising the organs at risk sparing. The study has been performed in silico, exploiting MC simulations of a breast cancer treatment. Ultrasound-based input has been used to compute the absorbed dose maps in different irradiation strategies and a quantitative comparison between the different options was carried out using Dose Volume Histograms. The system was capable of exploring different beam energies and applicator positions in few minutes, identifying the best strategy with an overall computation time that was found to be completely compatible with clinical implementation. The systematic uncertainty related to tissue deformation during treatment delivery with respect to imaging acquisition was taken into account. The potential and feasibility of a GPU based full MC TPS implementation of IOeRT breast cancer treatments has been demonstrated in-silico. This long awaited tool will greatly improve the treatment safety and efficacy, overcoming the limits identified within the clinical trials carried out so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Franciosini
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - D Carlotti
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitatio Campus-Bio Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - F Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A De Gregorio
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy
| | - V De Liso
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - F De Rosa
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy
| | | | - F Di Martino
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Felici
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - J Harold Pensavalle
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy; Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M C Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M Marafini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "E. Fermi", Rome, Italy
| | - A Muscato
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Specialty School of Medical Physics, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Paiar
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy
| | - V Patera
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A Sciubba
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Schiavi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - M Toppi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - G Traini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - A Trigilio
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Sarti
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Marino N, Bedeschi M, Vaccari ME, Cambiaghi M, Tesei A. Glitches in the brain: the dangerous relationship between radiotherapy and brain fog. Front Cell Neurosci 2024; 18:1328361. [PMID: 38515789 PMCID: PMC10956129 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1328361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Up to approximately 70% of cancer survivors report persistent deficits in memory, attention, speed of information processing, multi-tasking, and mental health functioning, a series of symptoms known as "brain fog." The severity and duration of such effects can vary depending on age, cancer type, and treatment regimens. In particular, every year, hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide undergo radiotherapy (RT) for primary brain tumors and brain metastases originating from extracranial tumors. Besides its potential benefits in the control of tumor progression, recent studies indicate that RT reprograms the brain tumor microenvironment inducing increased activation of microglia and astrocytes and a consequent general condition of neuroinflammation that in case it becomes chronic could lead to a cognitive decline. Furthermore, radiation can induce endothelium reticulum (ER) stress directly or indirectly by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) activating compensatory survival signaling pathways in the RT-surviving fraction of healthy neuronal and glial cells. In particular, the anomalous accumulation of misfolding proteins in neuronal cells exposed to radiation as a consequence of excessive activation of unfolded protein response (UPR) could pave the way to neurodegenerative disorders. Moreover, exposure of cells to ionizing radiation was also shown to affect the normal proteasome activity, slowing the degradation rate of misfolded proteins, and further exacerbating ER-stress conditions. This compromises several neuronal functions, with neuronal accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins with a consequent switch from proteasome to immunoproteasome that increases neuroinflammation, a crucial risk factor for neurodegeneration. The etiology of brain fog remains elusive and can arise not only during treatment but can also persist for an extended period after the end of RT. In this review, we will focus on the molecular pathways triggered by radiation therapy affecting cognitive functions and potentially at the origin of so-called "brain fog" symptomatology, with the aim to define novel therapeutic strategies to preserve healthy brain tissue from cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Marino
- Bioscience Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Martina Bedeschi
- Bioscience Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Melania Elettra Vaccari
- Bioscience Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Marco Cambiaghi
- Bioscience Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Anna Tesei
- Bioscience Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shiraishi Y, Matsuya Y, Fukunaga H. Possible mechanisms and simulation modeling of FLASH radiotherapy. Radiol Phys Technol 2024; 17:11-23. [PMID: 38184508 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00770-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has great potential to improve patient outcomes. It delivers radiation doses at an ultra-high dose rate (UHDR: ≥ 40 Gy/s) in a single instant or a few pulses. Much higher irradiation doses can be administered to tumors with FLASH-RT than with conventional dose rate (0.01-0.40 Gy/s) radiotherapy. UHDR irradiation can suppress toxicity in normal tissues while sustaining antitumor efficiency, which is referred to as the FLASH effect. However, the mechanisms underlying the effects of the FLASH remain unclear. To clarify these mechanisms, the development of simulation models that can contribute to treatment planning for FLASH-RT is still underway. Previous studies indicated that transient oxygen depletion or augmented reactions between secondary reactive species produced by irradiation may be involved in this process. To discuss the possible mechanisms of the FLASH effect and its clinical potential, we summarized the physicochemical, chemical, and biological perspectives as well as the development of simulation modeling for FLASH-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Shiraishi
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12 W5 Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Japan Healthcare University, 3-11-1-50 Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 062-0053, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsuya
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12 W5 Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Hisanori Fukunaga
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12 W5 Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Borghini A, Labate L, Piccinini S, Panaino CMV, Andreassi MG, Gizzi LA. FLASH Radiotherapy: Expectations, Challenges, and Current Knowledge. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2546. [PMID: 38473799 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Major strides have been made in the development of FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH RT) in the last ten years, but there are still many obstacles to overcome for transfer to the clinic to become a reality. Although preclinical and first-in-human clinical evidence suggests that ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs) induce a sparing effect in normal tissue without modifying the therapeutic effect on the tumor, successful clinical translation of FLASH-RT depends on a better understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning the sparing effect. Suitable in vitro studies are required to fully understand the radiobiological mechanisms associated with UHDRs. From a technical point of view, it is also crucial to develop optimal technologies in terms of beam irradiation parameters for producing FLASH conditions. This review provides an overview of the research progress of FLASH RT and discusses the potential challenges to be faced before its clinical application. We critically summarize the preclinical evidence and in vitro studies on DNA damage following UHDR irradiation. We also highlight the ongoing developments of technologies for delivering FLASH-compliant beams, with a focus on laser-driven plasma accelerators suitable for performing basic radiobiological research on the UHDR effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Labate
- Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory (ILIL), CNR Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Simona Piccinini
- Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory (ILIL), CNR Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Leonida Antonio Gizzi
- Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory (ILIL), CNR Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu K, Holmes S, Hooten B, Schüler E, Beddar S. Evaluation of ion chamber response for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:494-508. [PMID: 37696271 PMCID: PMC10840726 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Ion chambers are required for calibration and reference dosimetry applications in radiation therapy (RT). However, exposure of ion chambers in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) conditions pertinent to FLASH-RT leads to severe saturation and ion recombination, which limits their performance and usability. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate a set of commonly used commercially available ion chambers in RT, all with different design characteristics, and use this information to produce a prototype ion chamber with improved performance in UHDR conditions as a first step toward ion chambers specific for FLASH-RT. The Advanced Markus and Exradin A10, A26, and A20 ion chambers were evaluated. The chambers were placed in a water tank, at a depth of 2 cm, and exposed to an UHDR electron beam at different pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude settings on an IntraOp Mobetron. Ion chamber responses were investigated for the various beam parameter settings to isolate their dependence on integrated dose, mean dose rate and instantaneous dose rate, dose-per-pulse (DPP), and their design features such as chamber type, bias voltage, and collection volume. Furthermore, a thin parallel-plate (TPP) prototype ion chamber with reduced collector plate separation and volume was constructed and equally evaluated as the other chambers. The charge collection efficiency of the investigated ion chambers decreased with increasing DPP, whereas the mean dose rate did not affect the response of the chambers (± 1%). The dependence of the chamber response on DPP was found to be solely related to the total dose within the pulse, and not on mean dose rate, PW, or instantaneous dose rate within the ranges investigated. The polarity correction factor (Ppol ) values of the TPP prototype, A10, and Advanced Markus chambers were found to be independent of DPP and dose rate (± 2%), while the A20 and A26 chambers yielded significantly larger variations and dependencies under the same conditions. Ion chamber performance evaluated under different irradiation conditions of an UHDR electron beam revealed a strong dependence on DPP and a negligible dependence on the mean and instantaneous dose rates. These results suggest that modifications to ion chambers design to improve their usability in UHDR beamlines should focus on minimizing DPP effects, with emphasis on optimizing the electric field strength, through the construction of smaller electrode separation and larger bias voltages. This was confirmed through the production and evaluation of a prototype ion chamber specifically designed with these characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Liu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Emil Schüler
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shiraishi Y, Matsuya Y, Kusumoto T, Fukunaga H. Modeling for predicting survival fraction of cells after ultra-high dose rate irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2023; 69:015017. [PMID: 38056015 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad131b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Objective. FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) with ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation (i.e. > 40 Gy s-1) spares the function of normal tissues while preserving antitumor efficacy, known as the FLASH effect. The biological effects after conventional dose rate-radiotherapy (CONV-RT) with ≤0.1 Gy s-1have been well modeled by considering microdosimetry and DNA repair processes, meanwhile modeling of radiosensitivities under UHDR irradiation is insufficient. Here, we developed anintegrated microdosimetric-kinetic(IMK)model for UHDR-irradiationenabling the prediction of surviving fraction after UHDR irradiation.Approach.TheIMK model for UHDR-irradiationconsiders the initial DNA damage yields by the modification of indirect effects under UHDR compared to CONV dose rate. The developed model is based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) nature with the dose and dose square coefficients, considering the reduction of DNA damage yields as a function of dose rate.Main results.The estimate by the developed model could successfully reproduce thein vitroexperimental dose-response curve for various cell line types and dose rates.Significance.The developed model would be useful for predicting the biological effects under the UHDR irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Shiraishi
- Graduate school of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Japan Healthcare University, 3-11-1-50 Tsukisamu-higashi, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 062-0053, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsuya
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
- Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 2-4 Shirakata, Tokai, Ibaraki, 319-1195, Japan
| | - Tamon Kusumoto
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Hisanori Fukunaga
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rudigkeit S, Reindl J. Single-Cell Radiation Response Scoring with the Deep Learning Algorithm CeCILE 2.0. Cells 2023; 12:2782. [PMID: 38132103 PMCID: PMC10742313 DOI: 10.3390/cells12242782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
External stressors, such as ionizing radiation, have massive effects on life, survival, and the ability of mammalian cells to divide. Different types of radiation have different effects. In order to understand these in detail and the underlying mechanisms, it is essential to study the radiation response of each cell. This allows abnormalities to be characterized and laws to be derived. Tracking individual cells over several generations of division generates large amounts of data that can no longer be meaningfully analyzed by hand. In this study, we present a deep-learning-based algorithm, CeCILE (Cell classification and in vitro lifecycle evaluation) 2.0, that can localize, classify, and track cells in live cell phase-contrast videos. This allows conclusions to be drawn about the viability of the cells, the cell cycle, cell survival, and the influence of X-ray radiation on these. Furthermore, radiation-specific abnormalities during division could be characterized. In summary, CeCILE 2.0 is a powerful tool to characterize and quantify the cellular response to external stressors such as radiation and to put individual responses into a larger context. To the authors knowledge, this is the first algorithm with a fully integrated workflow that is able to do comprehensive single-cell and cell composite analysis, allowing them to draw conclusions on cellular radiation response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judith Reindl
- Section Biomedical Radiation Physics, Institute for Applied Physics and Measurement Technology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Metzkes-Ng J, Brack FE, Kroll F, Bernert C, Bock S, Bodenstein E, Brand M, Cowan TE, Gebhardt R, Hans S, Helbig U, Horst F, Jansen J, Kraft SD, Krause M, Leßmann E, Löck S, Pawelke J, Püschel T, Reimold M, Rehwald M, Richter C, Schlenvoigt HP, Schramm U, Schürer M, Seco J, Szabó ER, Umlandt MEP, Zeil K, Ziegler T, Beyreuther E. The DRESDEN PLATFORM is a research hub for ultra-high dose rate radiobiology. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20611. [PMID: 37996453 PMCID: PMC10667545 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46873-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The recently observed FLASH effect describes the observation of normal tissue protection by ultra-high dose rates (UHDR), or dose delivery in a fraction of a second, at similar tumor-killing efficacy of conventional dose delivery and promises great benefits for radiotherapy patients. Dedicated studies are now necessary to define a robust set of dose application parameters for FLASH radiotherapy and to identify underlying mechanisms. These studies require particle accelerators with variable temporal dose application characteristics for numerous radiation qualities, equipped for preclinical radiobiological research. Here we present the DRESDEN PLATFORM, a research hub for ultra-high dose rate radiobiology. By uniting clinical and research accelerators with radiobiology infrastructure and know-how, the DRESDEN PLATFORM offers a unique environment for studying the FLASH effect. We introduce its experimental capabilities and demonstrate the platform's suitability for systematic investigation of FLASH by presenting results from a concerted in vivo radiobiology study with zebrafish embryos. The comparative pre-clinical study was conducted across one electron and two proton accelerator facilities, including an advanced laser-driven proton source applied for FLASH-relevant in vivo irradiations for the first time. The data show a protective effect of UHDR irradiation up to [Formula: see text] and suggests consistency of the protective effect even at escalated dose rates of [Formula: see text]. With the first clinical FLASH studies underway, research facilities like the DRESDEN PLATFORM, addressing the open questions surrounding FLASH, are essential to accelerate FLASH's translation into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Florian Kroll
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Constantin Bernert
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Bock
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Bodenstein
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Brand
- Center for Regenerative Therapies (CRTD), TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence - Physics of Life, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas E Cowan
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - René Gebhardt
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Hans
- Center for Regenerative Therapies (CRTD), TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence - Physics of Life, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Uwe Helbig
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix Horst
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jeannette Jansen
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Mechthild Krause
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medizinische Fakultät and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Christian Richter
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Schramm
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Schürer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medizinische Fakultät and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emília Rita Szabó
- ELI ALPS, ELI-HU Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Marvin E P Umlandt
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karl Zeil
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tim Ziegler
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Petersson K, Ozsahin EM, Herrera FG, Bailat C, Bochud F, Bourhis J, Moeckli R, Adrian G. Effect of Conventional and Ultrahigh Dose Rate FLASH Irradiations on Preclinical Tumor Models: A Systematic Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1007-1017. [PMID: 37276928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Compared with conventional dose rate irradiation (CONV), ultrahigh dose rate irradiation (UHDR) has shown superior normal tissue sparing. However, a clinically relevant widening of the therapeutic window by UHDR, termed "FLASH effect," also depends on the tumor toxicity obtained by UHDR. Based on a combined analysis of published literature, the current study examined the hypothesis of tumor isoefficacy for UHDR versus CONV and aimed to identify potential knowledge gaps to inspire future in vivo studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search identified publications assessing in vivo tumor responses comparing UHDR and CONV. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, including combined analyses of tumor growth and survival data. RESULTS We identified 66 data sets from 15 publications that compared UHDR and CONV for tumor efficacy. The median number of animals per group was 9 (range 3-15) and the median follow-up period was 30.5 days (range 11-230) after the first irradiation. Tumor growth assays were the predominant model used. Combined statistical analyses of tumor growth and survival data are consistent with UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. Only 1 study determined tumor-controlling dose (TCD50) and reported statistically nonsignificant differences. CONCLUSIONS The combined quantitative analyses of tumor responses support the assumption of UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. However, the comparisons are primarily based on heterogeneous tumor growth assays with limited numbers of animals and short follow-up, and most studies do not assess long-term tumor control probability. Therefore, the assays may be insensitive in resolving smaller response differences, such as responses of radioresistant tumor subclones. Hence, tumor cure experiments, including additional TCD50 experiments, are needed to confirm the assumption of isoeffectiveness in curative settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Song CW, Terezakis S, Park WY, Paek SH, Kim MS, Cho LC, Griffin RJ. Preferential Tumor Vascular Damage Is the Common Antitumor Mechanism of High-Dose Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy: SABR, Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy, and FLASH Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:701-704. [PMID: 37196835 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chang W Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Woo-Yoon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Sun-Ha Paek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - L Chinsoo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Robert J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jeon C, Ahn S, Amano D, Kamiguchi N, Cho S, Sheen H, Park HC, Han Y. FLASH dose rate calculation based on log files in proton pencil beam scanning therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:7154-7166. [PMID: 37431587 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In radiation therapy, irradiating healthy normal tissues in the beam trajectories is inevitable. This unnecessary dose means that patients undergoing treatment risk developing side effects. Recently, FLASH radiotherapy delivering ultra-high-dose-rate beams has been re-examined because of its normal-tissue-sparing effect. To confirm the mean and instantaneous dose rates of the FLASH beam, stable and accurate dosimetry is required. PURPOSE Detailed verification of the FLASH effect requires dosimeters and a method to measure the average and instantaneous dose rate stably for 2- or 3-dimensional dose distributions. To verify the delivered FLASH beam, we utilized machine log files from the built-in monitor chamber to develop a dosimetry method to calculate the dose and average/instantaneous dose rate distributions in two or three dimensions in a phantom. METHODS To create a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) and deliver a uniform dose in a target, a mini-ridge filter was created with a 3D printer. Proton pencil beam line scanning plans of 2 × 2 cm2 , 3 × 3 cm2 , 4 × 4 cm2 , and round shapes with 2.3 cm diameter patterns delivering 230 MeV energy protons were created. The absorbed dose in the solid water phantom of each plan was measured using a PPC05 ionization chamber (IBA Dosimetry, Virginia, USA) in the SOBP region, and the log files for each plan were exported from the treatment control system console. Using these log files, the delivered dose and average dose rate were calculated using two methods: a direct method and a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method that uses log file information. The computed and average dose rates were compared with the ionization chamber measurements. Additionally, instantaneous dose rates in user-defined volumes were calculated using the MC simulation method with a temporal resolution of 5 ms. RESULTS Compared to ionization chamber dosimetry, 10 of 12 cases using the direct calculation method and 9 of 11 cases using the MC method had a dose difference below ±3%. Nine of 12 cases using the direct calculation method and 8 of 11 cases using the MC method had dose rate differences below ±3%. The average and maximum dose differences for the direct calculation and MC method were-0.17, +0.72%, and -3.15, +3.32%, respectively. For the dose rate difference, the average and maximum for the direct calculation and MC method were +1.26, +1.12%, and +3.75, +3.15%, respectively. In the instantaneous dose rate calculation with the MC simulation, a large fluctuation with a maximum of 163 Gy/s and a minimum of 4.29 Gy/s instantaneous dose rate was observed in a specific position, whereas the mean dose rate was 62 Gy/s. CONCLUSIONS We successfully developed methods in which machine log files are used to calculate the dose and the average and instantaneous dose rates for FLASH radiotherapy and demonstrated the feasibility of verifying the delivered FLASH beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanil Jeon
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunghwan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Daizo Amano
- Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Sungkoo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heesoon Sheen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngyih Han
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ursino S, Gadducci G, Giannini N, Gonnelli A, Fuentes T, Di Martino F, Paiar F. New insights on clinical perspectives of FLASH radiotherapy: from low- to very high electron energy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1254601. [PMID: 37936603 PMCID: PMC10626470 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1254601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is performed in approximately 75% of patients with cancer, and its efficacy is often hampered by the low tolerance of the surrounding normal tissues. Recent advancements have demonstrated the potential to widen the therapeutic window using "very short" radiation treatment delivery (from a conventional dose rate between 0.5 Gy/min and 2 Gy/min to more than 40 Gy/s) causing a significant increase of normal tissue tolerance without varying the tumor effect. This phenomenon is called "FLASH Effect (FE)" and has been discovered by using electrons. Although several physical, dosimetric, and radiobiological aspects need to be clarified, current preclinical "in vivo" studies have reported a significant protective effect of FLASH RT on neurocognitive function, skin toxicity, lung fibrosis, and bowel injury. Therefore, the current radiobiological premises lay the foundation for groundbreaking potentials in clinical translation, which could be addressed to an initial application of Low Energy Electron FLASH (LEE) for the treatment of superficial tumors to a subsequent Very High Energy Electron FLASH (VHEE) for the treatment of deep tumors. Herein, we report a clinical investigational scenario that, if supported by preclinical studies, could be drawn in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Ursino
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e implementazione clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Center for Instrument Sharing University of Pisa (CISUP), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gadducci
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e implementazione clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Noemi Giannini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e implementazione clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gonnelli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e implementazione clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Taiushia Fuentes
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e implementazione clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Di Martino
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e implementazione clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Unit of Medical Physics, S. Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabiola Paiar
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e implementazione clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Center for Instrument Sharing University of Pisa (CISUP), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Polevoy GG, Kumar DS, Daripelli S, Prasanna M. Flash Therapy for Cancer: A Potentially New Radiotherapy Methodology. Cureus 2023; 15:e46928. [PMID: 38021805 PMCID: PMC10640654 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In traditional treatment modalities and standard clinical practices, FLASH radiotherapy (FL-RT) administers radiation therapy at an exceptionally high dosage rate. When compared to standard dose rate radiation therapy, numerous preclinical investigations have demonstrated that FL-RT provides similar benefits in conserving normal tissue while maintaining equal antitumor efficacy, a phenomenon possible due to the 'FLASH effect' (FE) of FL-RT. The methodologies involve proton radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation treatment, and managing high-throughput damage by radiation to solid tissues. Recent results from animal studies indicate that FL-RT can reduce radiation-induced tissue damage, significantly enhancing anticancer potency. Focusing on the potential benefits of FL proton beam treatment in the years to come, this review details the FL-RT research that has been done so far and the existing theories illuminating the FL effects. This subject remains of interest, with many issues still needing to be answered. We offer a brief review to emphasize a few of the key efforts and difficulties in moving FL radiation research forward. The existing research state of FL-RT, its affecting variables, and its different specific impacts are presented in this current review. Key topics discussed include the biochemical mechanism during FL therapy, beam sources for FL therapy, the FL effect on immunity, clinical and preclinical studies on the protective effect of FL therapy, and parameters for effective FL therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Devika S Kumar
- Department of Research and Development, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, IND
| | - Sushma Daripelli
- Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College (GMC) Jangaon, Jangaon, IND
| | - Muthu Prasanna
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Surya Group of Institutions, Tamil Nadu, IND
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Swarts SG, Flood AB, Swartz HM. Implications of "flash" radiotherapy for biodosimetry. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2023; 199:1450-1459. [PMID: 37721059 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Extremely high dose rate radiation delivery (FLASH) for cancer treatment has been shown to produce less damage to normal tissues while having the same radiotoxic effect on tumor tissue (referred to as the FLASH effect). Research on the FLASH effect has two very pertinent implications for the field of biodosimetry: (1) FLASH is a good model to simulate delivery of prompt radiation from the initial moments after detonating a nuclear weapon and (2) the FLASH effect elucidates how dose rate impacts the biological mechanisms that underlie most types of biological biodosimetry. The impact of dose rate will likely differ for different types of biodosimetry, depending on the specific underlying mechanisms. The greatest impact of FLASH effects is likely to occur for assays based on biological responses to radiation damage, but the consequences of differential effects of dose rates on the accuracy of dose estimates has not been taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven G Swarts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States
| | - Ann Barry Flood
- Department of Radiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States
- Clin-EPR, LLC, Lyme, NH 03769, United States
| | - Harold M Swartz
- Department of Radiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States
- Clin-EPR, LLC, Lyme, NH 03769, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Traneus E, Vallet V, Desorgher L, Ozsahin EM, Bochud F, Bourhis J, Moeckli R. 3D-conformal very-high energy electron therapy as candidate modality for FLASH-RT: A treatment planning study for glioblastoma and lung cancer. Med Phys 2023; 50:5745-5756. [PMID: 37427669 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-clinical ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron irradiations on time scales of 100 ms have demonstrated a remarkable sparing of brain and lung tissues while retaining tumor efficacy when compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. While clinically-used gantries and intensity modulation techniques are too slow to match such time scales, novel very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) radiotherapy (RT) devices using 3D-conformed broad VHEE beams are designed to deliver UHDR treatments that fulfill these timing requirements. PURPOSE To assess the dosimetric plan quality obtained using VHEE-based 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT) for treatments of glioblastoma and lung cancer patients and compare the resulting treatment plans to those delivered by standard-of-care intensity modulated photon RT (IMRT) techniques. METHODS Seven glioblastoma patients and seven lung cancer patients were planned with VHEE-based 3D-CRT using 3 to 16 coplanar beams with equidistant angular spacing and energies of 100 and 200 MeV using a forward planning approach. Dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, coverage (V95% ) and homogeneity (HI98% ) for the planning target volume (PTV), as well as near-maximum doses (D2% ) and mean doses (Dmean ) for organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated and compared to clinical IMRT plans. RESULTS Mean differences of V95% and HI98% of all VHEE plans were within 2% or better of the IMRT reference plans. Glioblastoma plan dose metrics obtained with VHEE configurations of 200 MeV and 3-16 beams were either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the clinical IMRT reference plans. All OAR plan dose metrics evaluated for VHEE plans created using 5 beams of 100 MeV were either not significantly different or within 3% on average, except for Dmean for the body, Dmean for the brain, D2% for the brain stem, and D2% for the chiasm, which were significantly increased by 1, 2, 6, and 8 Gy, respectively (however below clinical constraints). Similarly, the dose metrics for lung cancer patients were also either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the reference plans for VHEE configurations with 200 MeV and 5 to 16 beams with the exception of D2% and Dmean to the spinal canal (however below clinical constraints). For the lung cancer cases, the VHEE configurations using 100 MeV or only 3 beams resulted in significantly worse dose metrics for some OAR. Differences in dose metrics were, however, strongly patient-specific and similar for some patient cases. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based 3D-CRT may deliver conformal treatments to simple, mostly convex target shapes in the brain and the thorax with a limited number of critical adjacent OAR using a limited number of beams (as low as 3 to 7). Using such treatment techniques, a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of standard-of-care IMRT can be achieved. Hence, from a treatment planning perspective, 3D-conformal UHDR VHEE treatments delivered on time scales of 100 ms represent a promising candidate technique for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Veronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tan HS, Teo KBK, Dong L, Friberg A, Koumenis C, Diffenderfer E, Zou JW. Modeling ultra-high dose rate electron and proton FLASH effect with the physicochemical approach. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/ace14d. [PMID: 37352867 PMCID: PMC10472835 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ace14d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
Objective. A physicochemical model built on the radiochemical kinetic theory was recently proposed in (Labarbeet al2020) to explain the FLASH effect. We performed extensive simulations to scrutinize its applicability for oxygen depletion studies and FLASH-related experiments involving both proton and electron beams.Approach. Using the dose and beam delivery parameters for each FLASH experiment, we numerically solved the radiochemical rate equations comprised of a set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations to obtain the area under the curve (AUC) of radical concentrations.Main results. The modeled differences in AUC induced by ultra-high dose rates appeared to correlate well with the FLASH effect. (i) For the whole brain irradiation of mice performed in (Montay-Gruelet al2017), the threshold dose rate values for memory preservation coincided with those at which AUC started to decrease much less rapidly. (ii) For the proton pencil beam scanning FLASH of (Cunninghamet al2021), we found linear correlations between radicals' AUC and the biological endpoints: TGF-β1, leg contracture and plasma level of cytokine IL-6. (iii) Compatible with the findings of the proton FLASH experiment in (Kimet al2021), we found that radicals' AUC at the entrance and mid-Spread-Out Bragg peak regions were highly similar. In addition, our model also predicted ratios of oxygen depletionG-values between normal and UHDR irradiation similar to those observed in (Caoet al2021) and (El Khatibet al2022).Significance. Collectively, our results suggest that the normal tissue sparing conferred by UHDR irradiation may be due to the lower degree of exposure to peroxyl and superoxide radicals. We also found that the differential effect of dose rate on the radicals' AUC was less pronounced at lower initial oxygen levels, a trait that appears to align with the FLASH differential effect on normal versus tumor tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Siong Tan
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Kevin Boon Keng Teo
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Lei Dong
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Andrew Friberg
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Eric Diffenderfer
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Wei Zou
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cuitiño MC, Fleming JL, Jain S, Cetnar A, Ayan AS, Woollard J, Manring H, Meng W, McElroy JP, Blakaj DM, Gupta N, Chakravarti A. Comparison of Gonadal Toxicity of Single-Fraction Ultra-High Dose Rate and Conventional Radiation in Mice. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101201. [PMID: 37008254 PMCID: PMC10050676 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Increasing evidence suggests that ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) radiation could result in similar tumor control as conventional (CONV) radiation therapy (RT) while reducing toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. Considering that radiation toxicity to gonadal tissues can cause hormone disturbances and infertility in young patients with cancer, the purpose of this study was to assess the possible role of UHDR-RT in reducing toxicity to healthy gonads in mice compared with CONV-RT. Methods and Materials Radiation was delivered to the abdomen or pelvis of female (8 or 16 Gy) and male (5 Gy) C57BL/6J mice, respectively, at conventional (∼0.4 Gy/s) or ultrahigh (>100 Gy/s) dose rates using an IntraOp Mobetron linear accelerator. Organ weights along with histopathology and immunostaining of irradiated gonads were used to compare toxicity between radiation modalities. Results CONV-RT and UHDR-RT induced a similar decrease in uterine weights at both studied doses (∼50% of controls), which indicated similarly reduced ovarian follicular activity. Histologically, ovaries of CONV- and UHDR-irradiated mice exhibited a comparable lack of follicles. Weights of CONV- and UHDR-irradiated testes were reduced to ∼30% of controls, and the percentage of degenerate seminiferous tubules was also similar between radiation modalities (∼80% above controls). Pairwise comparisons of all quantitative data indicated statistical significance between irradiated (CONV or UHDR) and control groups (from P ≤ .01 to P ≤ .0001) but not between radiation modalities. Conclusions The data presented here suggest that the short-term effects of UHDR-RT on the mouse gonads are comparable to those of CONV-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C. Cuitiño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jessica L. Fleming
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sagarika Jain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ashley Cetnar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ahmet S. Ayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jeffrey Woollard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Heather Manring
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Wei Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joseph P. McElroy
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nilendu Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Camazzola G, Boscolo D, Scifoni E, Dorn A, Durante M, Krämer M, Abram V, Fuss MC. TRAX-CHEMxt: Towards the Homogeneous Chemical Stage of Radiation Damage. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24119398. [PMID: 37298351 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The indirect effect of radiation plays an important role in radio-induced biological damages. Monte Carlo codes have been widely used in recent years to study the chemical evolution of particle tracks. However, due to the large computational efforts required, their applicability is typically limited to simulations in pure water targets and to temporal scales up to the µs. In this work, a new extension of TRAX-CHEM is presented, namely TRAX-CHEMxt, able to predict the chemical yields at longer times, with the capability of exploring the homogeneous biochemical stage. Based on the species coordinates produced around one track, the set of reaction-diffusion equations is solved numerically with a computationally light approach based on concentration distributions. In the overlapping time scale (500 ns-1 µs), a very good agreement to standard TRAX-CHEM is found, with deviations below 6% for different beam qualities and oxygenations. Moreover, an improvement in the computational speed by more than three orders of magnitude is achieved. The results of this work are also compared with those from another Monte Carlo-based algorithm and a fully homogeneous code (Kinetiscope). TRAX-CHEMxt will allow for studying the variation in chemical endpoints at longer timescales with the introduction, as the next step, of biomolecules, for more realistic assessments of biological response under different radiation and environmental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianmarco Camazzola
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Quantum Dynamics and Control Division, Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daria Boscolo
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), 38123 Povo, Italy
| | - Alexander Dorn
- Quantum Dynamics and Control Division, Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michael Krämer
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Valentino Abram
- Department of Mathematics, University of Trento, 38123 Povo, Italy
| | - Martina C Fuss
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tubin S, Vozenin M, Prezado Y, Durante M, Prise K, Lara P, Greco C, Massaccesi M, Guha C, Wu X, Mohiuddin M, Vestergaard A, Bassler N, Gupta S, Stock M, Timmerman R. Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100605. [PMID: 36910025 PMCID: PMC9996385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
•Improvement of therapeutic ratio by novel unconventional radiotherapy approaches.•Immunomodulation using high-dose spatially fractionated radiotherapy.•Boosting radiation anti-tumor effects by adding an immune-mediated cell killing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tubin
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Corresponding author.
| | - M.C. Vozenin
- Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Radiation Oncology Service, Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y. Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
| | - M. Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, Darmstadt 64291, Germany
- Technsiche Universität Darmstadt, Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K.M. Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - P.C. Lara
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Roque University Hospital & Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, C/Dolores de la Rocha 9, Las Palmas GC 35001, Spain
| | - C. Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
| | - M. Massaccesi
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C. Guha
- Montefiore Medical Center Radiation Oncology, 111 E 210th St, New York, NY, United States
| | - X. Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, 19470 NE 22nd Road, Miami, FL 33179, United States
| | - M.M. Mohiuddin
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Pkwy, Warrenville, IL 60555, United States
| | - A. Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N. Bassler
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Gupta
- The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - M. Stock
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - R. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Inwood Road Dallas, TX 2280, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cooper CR, Jones DJL, Jones GDD, Petersson K. Comet Assay Profiling of FLASH-Induced Damage: Mechanistic Insights into the Effects of FLASH Irradiation. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:7195. [PMID: 37108360 PMCID: PMC10138874 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated the normal tissue-sparing effects of ultra-high dose rate 'FLASH' irradiation in vivo, with an associated reduction in damage burden being reported in vitro. Towards this, two key radiochemical mechanisms have been proposed: radical-radical recombination (RRR) and transient oxygen depletion (TOD), with both being proposed to lead to reduced levels of induced damage. Previously, we reported that FLASH induces lower levels of DNA strand break damage in whole-blood peripheral blood lymphocytes (WB-PBL) ex vivo, but our study failed to distinguish the mechanism(s) involved. A potential outcome of RRR is the formation of crosslink damage (particularly, if any organic radicals recombine), whilst a possible outcome of TOD is a more anoxic profile of induced damage resulting from FLASH. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to profile FLASH-induced damage via the Comet assay, assessing any DNA crosslink formation as a putative marker of RRR and/or anoxic DNA damage formation as an indicative marker of TOD, to determine the extent to which either mechanism contributes to the "FLASH effect". Following FLASH irradiation, we see no evidence of any crosslink formation; however, FLASH irradiation induces a more anoxic profile of induced damage, supporting the TOD mechanism. Furthermore, treatment of WB-PBLs pre-irradiation with BSO abrogates the reduced strand break damage burden mediated by FLASH exposures. In summary, we do not see any experimental evidence to support the RRR mechanism contributing to the reduced damage burden induced by FLASH. However, the observation of a greater anoxic profile of damage following FLASH irradiation, together with the BSO abrogation of the reduced strand break damage burden mediated by FLASH, lends further support to TOD being a driver of the reduced damage burden plus a change in the damage profile mediated by FLASH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian R. Cooper
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Donald J. L. Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
| | - George D. D. Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schulte R, Johnstone C, Boucher S, Esarey E, Geddes CGR, Kravchenko M, Kutsaev S, Loo BW, Méot F, Mustapha B, Nakamura K, Nanni EA, Obst-Huebl L, Sampayan SE, Schroeder CB, Sheng K, Snijders AM, Snively E, Tantawi SG, Van Tilborg J. Transformative Technology for FLASH Radiation Therapy. APPLIED SCIENCES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 13:5021. [PMID: 38240007 PMCID: PMC10795821 DOI: 10.3390/app13085021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
The general concept of radiation therapy used in conventional cancer treatment is to increase the therapeutic index by creating a physical dose differential between tumors and normal tissues through precision dose targeting, image guidance, and radiation beams that deliver a radiation dose with high conformality, e.g., protons and ions. However, the treatment and cure are still limited by normal tissue radiation toxicity, with the corresponding side effects. A fundamentally different paradigm for increasing the therapeutic index of radiation therapy has emerged recently, supported by preclinical research, and based on the FLASH radiation effect. FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) is an ultra-high-dose-rate delivery of a therapeutic radiation dose within a fraction of a second. Experimental studies have shown that normal tissues seem to be universally spared at these high dose rates, whereas tumors are not. While dose delivery conditions to achieve a FLASH effect are not yet fully characterized, it is currently estimated that doses delivered in less than 200 ms produce normal-tissue-sparing effects, yet effectively kill tumor cells. Despite a great opportunity, there are many technical challenges for the accelerator community to create the required dose rates with novel compact accelerators to ensure the safe delivery of FLASH radiation beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhard Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA
| | - Carol Johnstone
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510, USA
| | - Salime Boucher
- RadiaBeam Technologies, LLC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Eric Esarey
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | | | | | - Sergey Kutsaev
- RadiaBeam Technologies, LLC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Billy W. Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - François Méot
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | | | - Kei Nakamura
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Emilio A. Nanni
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | | - Stephen E. Sampayan
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
- Opcondys, Inc., Manteca, CA 95336, USA
| | | | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | | | - Emma Snively
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | - Sami G. Tantawi
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liu K, Palmiero A, Chopra N, Velasquez B, Li Z, Beddar S, Schüler E. Dual beam-current transformer design for monitoring and reporting of electron ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) beam parameters. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13891. [PMID: 36601691 PMCID: PMC9924113 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the usefulness and effectiveness of a dual beam-current transformer (BCTs) design to monitor and record the beam dosimetry output and energy of pulsed electron FLASH (eFLASH) beams in real-time, and to inform on the usefulness of this design for future eFLASH beam control. METHODS Two BCTs are integrated into the head of a FLASH Mobetron system, one located after the primary scattering foil and the other downstream of the secondary scattering foil. The response of the BCTs was evaluated individually to monitor beam output as a function of dose, scattering conditions, and ability to capture physical beam parameters such as pulse width (PW), pulse repetition frequency (PRF), and dose per pulse (DPP), and in combination to determine beam energy using the ratio of the lower-to-upper BCT signal. RESULTS A linear relationship was observed between the absorbed dose measured on Gafchromic film and the BCT signals for both the upper and lower BCT (R2 > 0.99). A linear relationship was also observed in the BCT signals as a function of the number of pulses delivered regardless of the PW, DPP, or PRF (R2 > 0.99). The lower-to-upper BCT ratio was found to correlate strongly with the energy of the eFLASH beam due to differential beam attenuation caused by the secondary scattering foil. The BCTs were also able to provide accurate information about the PW, PRF, energy, and DPP for each individual pulse delivered in real-time. CONCLUSION The dual BCT system integrated within the FLASH Mobetron was shown to be a reliable monitoring system able to quantify accelerator performance and capture all essential physical beam parameters on a pulse-by-pulse basis, and the ratio between the two BCTs was strongly correlated with beam energy. The fast signal readout and processing enables the BCTs to provide real-time information on beam output and energy and is proposed as a system suitable for accurate beam monitoring and control of eFLASH beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Liu
- Department of Radiation PhysicsDivision of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA,Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Allison Palmiero
- Department of Radiation PhysicsDivision of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Nitish Chopra
- Department of Radiation PhysicsDivision of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Brett Velasquez
- Department of Radiation PhysicsDivision of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Ziyi Li
- Department of BiostatisticsDivision of Basic SciencesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation PhysicsDivision of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA,Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation PhysicsDivision of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA,Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Espinosa-Rodriguez A, Villa-Abaunza A, Díaz N, Pérez-Díaz M, Sánchez-Parcerisa D, Udías J, Ibáñez P. Design of an X-ray irradiator based on a standard imaging X-ray tube with FLASH dose-rate capabilities for preclinical research. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
38
|
Swartz HM, Vaupel P, Flood AB. A Critical Analysis of Possible Mechanisms for the Oxygen Effect in Radiation Therapy with FLASH. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 1438:127-133. [PMID: 37845451 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-42003-0_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this review is to stimulate readers to undertake appropriate investigations of the mechanism for a possible oxygen effect in FLASH. FLASH is a method of delivery of radiation that empirically, in animal models, appears to decrease the impact of radiation on normal tissues while retaining full effect on tumors. This has the potential for achieving a significantly increased effectiveness of radiation therapy. The mechanism is not known but, especially in view of the prominent role that oxygen has in the effects of radiation, investigations of mechanisms of FLASH have often focused on impacts of FLASH on oxygen levels. We and others have previously shown that simple differential depletion of oxygen directly changing the response to radiation is not a likely mechanism. In this review we consider how time-varying changes in oxygen levels could account for the FLASH effect by changing oxygen-dependent signaling in cells. While the methods of delivering FLASH are still evolving, current approaches for FLASH can differ from conventional irradiation in several ways that can impact the pattern of oxygen consumption: the rate of delivery of the radiation (40 Gy/s vs. 0.1 Gy/s), the time over which each fraction is delivered (e.g., <0.5 s. vs. 300 s), the delivery in pulses, the number of fractions, the size of the fractions, and the total duration of treatment. Taking these differences into account and recognizing that cell signaling is an intrinsic component of the need for cells to maintain steady-state conditions and, therefore, is activated by small changes in the environment, we delineate the potential time dependent changes in oxygen consumption and overview the cell signaling pathways whose differential activation by FLASH could account for the observed biological effects of FLASH. We speculate that the most likely pathways are those involved in repair of damaged DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold M Swartz
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | - Peter Vaupel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, University of Freiburg/Brsg., Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ann Barry Flood
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mirjolet C, Baude J, Galluzzi L. Dual impact of radiation therapy on tumor-targeting immune responses. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2023; 378:xiii-xxiv. [PMID: 37438022 DOI: 10.1016/s1937-6448(23)00114-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Mirjolet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Preclinical Radiation Therapy and Radiobiology Unit, GF Leclerc Centre, Unicancer, Dijon, France; TIReCS Team, UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, France.
| | - Jérémy Baude
- Radiation Oncology Department, Preclinical Radiation Therapy and Radiobiology Unit, GF Leclerc Centre, Unicancer, Dijon, France
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States; Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sminia P, Guipaud O, Viktorsson K, Ahire V, Baatout S, Boterberg T, Cizkova J, Dostál M, Fernandez-Palomo C, Filipova A, François A, Geiger M, Hunter A, Jassim H, Edin NFJ, Jordan K, Koniarová I, Selvaraj VK, Meade AD, Milliat F, Montoro A, Politis C, Savu D, Sémont A, Tichy A, Válek V, Vogin G. Clinical Radiobiology for Radiation Oncology. RADIOBIOLOGY TEXTBOOK 2023:237-309. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-18810-7_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter is focused on radiobiological aspects at the molecular, cellular, and tissue level which are relevant for the clinical use of ionizing radiation (IR) in cancer therapy. For radiation oncology, it is critical to find a balance, i.e., the therapeutic window, between the probability of tumor control and the probability of side effects caused by radiation injury to the healthy tissues and organs. An overview is given about modern precision radiotherapy (RT) techniques, which allow optimal sparing of healthy tissues. Biological factors determining the width of the therapeutic window are explained. The role of the six typical radiobiological phenomena determining the response of both malignant and normal tissues in the clinic, the 6R’s, which are Reoxygenation, Redistribution, Repopulation, Repair, Radiosensitivity, and Reactivation of the immune system, is discussed. Information is provided on tumor characteristics, for example, tumor type, growth kinetics, hypoxia, aberrant molecular signaling pathways, cancer stem cells and their impact on the response to RT. The role of the tumor microenvironment and microbiota is described and the effects of radiation on the immune system including the abscopal effect phenomenon are outlined. A summary is given on tumor diagnosis, response prediction via biomarkers, genetics, and radiomics, and ways to selectively enhance the RT response in tumors. Furthermore, we describe acute and late normal tissue reactions following exposure to radiation: cellular aspects, tissue kinetics, latency periods, permanent or transient injury, and histopathology. Details are also given on the differential effect on tumor and late responding healthy tissues following fractionated and low dose rate irradiation as well as the effect of whole-body exposure.
Collapse
|
41
|
Royba E, Repin M, Balajee AS, Shuryak I, Pampou S, Karan C, Wang YF, Lemus OD, Obaid R, Deoli N, Wuu CS, Brenner DJ, Garty G. Validation of a High-Throughput Dicentric Chromosome Assay Using Complex Radiation Exposures. Radiat Res 2023; 199:1-16. [PMID: 35994701 PMCID: PMC9947868 DOI: 10.1667/rade-22-00007.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Validation of biodosimetry assays is routinely performed using primarily orthovoltage irradiators at a conventional dose rate of approximately 1 Gy/min. However, incidental/ accidental exposures caused by nuclear weapons can be more complex. The aim of this work was to simulate the DNA damage effects mimicking those caused by the detonation of a several kilotons improvised nuclear device (IND). For this, we modeled complex exposures to: 1. a mixed (photons + IND-neutrons) field and 2. different dose rates that may come from the blast, nuclear fallout, or ground deposition of radionuclides (ground shine). Additionally, we assessed whether myeloid cytokines affect the precision of radiation dose estimation by modulating the frequency of dicentric chromosomes. To mimic different exposure scenarios, several irradiation systems were used. In a mixed field study, human blood samples were exposed to a photon field enriched with neutrons (ranging from 10% to 37%) from a source that mimics Hiroshima's A-bomb's energy spectrum (0.2-9 MeV). Using statistical analysis, we assessed whether photons and neutrons act in an additive or synergistic way to form dicentrics. For the dose rates study, human blood was exposed to photons or electrons at dose rates ranging from low (where the dose was spread over 32 h) to extremely high (where the dose was delivered in a fraction of a microsecond). Potential effects of cytokine treatment on biodosimetry dose predictions were analyzed in irradiated blood subjected to Neupogen or Neulasta for 24 or 48 h at the concentration recommended to forestall manifestation of an acute radiation syndrome in bomb survivors. All measurements were performed using a robotic station, the Rapid Automated Biodosimetry Tool II, programmed to culture lymphocytes and score dicentrics in multiwell plates (the RABiT-II DCA). In agreement with classical concepts of radiation biology, the RABiT-II DCA calibration curves suggested that the frequency of dicentrics depends on the type of radiation and is modulated by changes in the dose rate. The resulting dose-response curves suggested an intermediate dicentric yields and additive effects of photons and IND-neutrons in the mixed field. At ultra-high dose rate (600 Gy/s), affected lymphocytes exhibited significantly fewer dicentrics (P < 0.004, t test). In contrast, we did not find the dose-response modification effects of radiomitigators on the yields of dicentrics (Bonferroni corrected P > 0.006, ANOVA test). This result suggests no bias in the dose predictions should be expected after emergency cytokine treatment initiated up to 48 h prior to blood collection for dicentric analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Royba
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Mikhail Repin
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Adayabalam S. Balajee
- Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS), Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory (CBL), Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Sergey Pampou
- Columbia Genome Center High-Throughput Screening facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles Karan
- Columbia Genome Center High-Throughput Screening facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Yi-Fang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Olga Dona Lemus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Razib Obaid
- Radiological Research Accelerator facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, New York
- Currently at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California
| | - Naresh Deoli
- Radiological Research Accelerator facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, New York
| | - Cheng-Shie Wuu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - David J. Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Guy Garty
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
- Radiological Research Accelerator facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, New York
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Seino R, Uno H, Fukunaga H. Validation of mitotic harvesting method with human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells expressing fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicators for radiation research. Biomed Res 2023; 44:181-186. [PMID: 37779030 DOI: 10.2220/biomedres.44.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
The cell cycle is a series of events in the process of one cell giving rise to two daughter cells. The mitotic harvesting method, established by Terasima and Tolmach in the 1960s, causes minimal physiological stress on the cells and achieves a high degree of cell cycle synchrony by collecting only mitotic cells from a cultured cell system. The purpose of the present study is to validate the versatility of the mitotic harvesting method using human cervical cell line HeLa cells expressing Fluorescent Ubiquitination-based Cell Cycle Indicators (FUCCI) and to estimate the cell cycle-dependent changes in radiosensitivity in HeLa-FUCCI cells. The image analysis showed that cell cycle synchrony was maintained for at least 24 hours after mitotic cell collection. Also, the clonogenic assay demonstrated changes in radiosensitivity that were cell cycle dependent. These results indicate that the mitotic harvesting method using FUCCI-expressing cells has high versatility in the field of radiation cell biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Seino
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University
| | - Hiroto Uno
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University
| | - Hisanori Fukunaga
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Iturri L, Bertho A, Lamirault C, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Pouzoulet F, Verrelle P, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy and Immune Infiltration: Evaluation in an Orthotopic Glioma Rat Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022:S0360-3016(22)03639-2. [PMID: 36563907 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) is a promising radiation technique that uses ultrahigh doses of radiation to increase the therapeutic window of the treatment. FLASH-RT has been observed to provide normal tissue sparing at high dose rates and similar tumor control compared with conventional RT, yet the biological processes governing these radiobiological effects are still unknown. In this study, we sought to investigate the potential immune response generated by FLASH-RT in a high dose of proton therapy in an orthotopic glioma rat model. METHODS AND MATERIALS We cranially irradiated rats with a single high dose (25 Gy) using FLASH dose rate proton irradiation (257 ± 2 Gy/s) or conventional dose rate proton irradiation (4 ± 0.02 Gy/s). We first assessed the protective FLASH effect that resulted in our setup through behavioral studies in naïve rats. This was followed by a comprehensive analysis of immune cells in blood, healthy tissue of the brain, and tumor microenvironment by flow cytometry. RESULTS Proton FLASH-RT spared memory impairment produced by conventional high-dose proton therapy and induced a similar tumor infiltrating lymphocyte recruitment. Additionally, a general neuroinflammation that was similar in both dose rates was observed. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this study demonstrated that FLASH proton therapy offers a neuro-protective effect even at high doses while mounting an effective lymphoid immune response in the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorea Iturri
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO (U1288), Orsay, 91898 France; Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898 France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO (U1288), Orsay, 91898 France; Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898 France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kanouta E, Poulsen PR, Kertzscher G, Sitarz MK, Sørensen BS, Johansen JG. Time-resolved dose rate measurements in pencil beam scanning proton FLASH therapy with a fiber-coupled scintillator detector system. Med Phys 2022; 50:2450-2462. [PMID: 36508162 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The spatial and temporal dose rate distribution of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy is important in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) or FLASH irradiations. Validation of the temporal structure of the dose rate is crucial for quality assurance and may be performed using detectors with high temporal resolution and large dynamic range. PURPOSE To provide time-resolved in vivo dose rate measurements using a scintillator-based detector during proton PBS pre-clinical mouse experiments with dose rates ranging from conventional to UHDR. METHODS All irradiations were performed at the entrance plateau of a 250 MeV PBS proton beam. A detector system with four fiber-coupled ZnSe:O inorganic scintillators and 20 μs temporal resolution was used for dose rate measurements. The system was first characterized in terms of precision and stem signal. The detector precision was determined through repeated irradiations with the same field. The stem signal contribution was quantified by irradiating two of the detector probes alongside a bare fiber (fiber without a coupled scintillator). Next, the detector system was calibrated against an ionization chamber (IC) with all four detector probes and the IC placed in a water bath at 2 cm depth. A scan pattern covering 9.6 × 9.6 cm was used. Multiple irradiations with different requested nozzle currents provided instantaneous dose rates at the detector positions in the range of 7-1270 Gy/s. The correspondence of the detector signal (in Volts) to the instantaneous dose rate (in Gy/s) was found. The instantaneous dose rate was calculated from the beam current and the spot-to-detector distance assuming a Gaussian beam profile at distances up to 8 mm from the spot. Afterwards, the calibrated system was used in vivo, in mouse experiments, where mouse legs were irradiated with a constant dose and varying field dose rates of 0.7-87.5 Gy/s. The instantaneous dose rate was measured for each delivered spot and the delivered dose was determined as the integrated instantaneous dose rate. The spot dose profile and PBS dose rate map were calculated. The dose contamination to neighbouring mice were measured together with the upper limit of the dose to the mouse body. RESULTS The detectors showed high precision with ≤0.4% fluctuations in the measured dose. The stem signal exceeded 10% for spots <5 mm from the optical fiber and >18 mm from the scintillator. It contributed up to 0.2% to the total dose, which was considered negligible. All four detectors showed a non-linear relation between signal and instantaneous dose rate, which was modelled with a polynomial response function. In the mouse experiments, the measured scintillator dose showed 1.8% fluctuations, independent of the field dose rate. The in vivo measured spot dose profile had tails that deviated from a Gaussian profile with measurable dose contributions from spots up to 85 mm from the detector. Neighbour mouse irradiation contributed ∼1% of the total mouse dose. The upper limit of the mouse body dose was 6% of the mouse leg dose. CONCLUSIONS A fiber-coupled inorganic scintillator-based detector system can provide high precision in vivo measurements of the instantaneous dose rate if correction for the non-linear dose rate dependency is applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Kanouta
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Per Rugaard Poulsen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Mateusz Krzysztof Sitarz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jacob Graversen Johansen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Calvo FA, Ayestaran A, Serrano J, Cambeiro M, Palma J, Meiriño R, Morcillo MA, Lapuente F, Chiva L, Aguilar B, Azcona D, Pedrero D, Pascau J, Delgado JM, Aristu J, Prezado Y. Practice-oriented solutions integrating intraoperative electron irradiation and personalized proton therapy for recurrent or unresectable cancers: Proof of concept and potential for dual FLASH effect. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1037262. [PMID: 36452493 PMCID: PMC9703091 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1037262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oligo-recurrent disease has a consolidated evidence of long-term surviving patients due to the use of intense local cancer therapy. The latter combines real-time surgical exploration/resection with high-energy electron beam single dose of irradiation. This results in a very precise radiation dose deposit, which is an essential element of contemporary multidisciplinary individualized oncology. Methods Patient candidates to proton therapy were evaluated in Multidisciplinary Tumor Board to consider improved treatment options based on the institutional resources and expertise. Proton therapy was delivered by a synchrotron-based pencil beam scanning technology with energy levels from 70.2 to 228.7 MeV, whereas intraoperative electrons were generated in a miniaturized linear accelerator with dose rates ranging from 22 to 36 Gy/min (at Dmax) and energies from 6 to 12 MeV. Results In a period of 24 months, 327 patients were treated with proton therapy: 218 were adults, 97 had recurrent cancer, and 54 required re-irradiation. The specific radiation modalities selected in five cases included an integral strategy to optimize the local disease management by the combination of surgery, intraoperative electron boost, and external pencil beam proton therapy as components of the radiotherapy management. Recurrent cancer was present in four cases (cervix, sarcoma, melanoma, and rectum), and one patient had a primary unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In re-irradiated patients (cervix and rectum), a tentative radical total dose was achieved by integrating beams of electrons (ranging from 10- to 20-Gy single dose) and protons (30 to 54-Gy Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), in 10-25 fractions). Conclusions Individual case solution strategies combining intraoperative electron radiation therapy and proton therapy for patients with oligo-recurrent or unresectable localized cancer are feasible. The potential of this combination can be clinically explored with electron and proton FLASH beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe A Calvo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adriana Ayestaran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Serrano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mauricio Cambeiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jacobo Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Meiriño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel A Morcillo
- Medical Applications Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Lapuente
- Department of Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstretics, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja Aguilar
- Department of Medical Physics, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Azcona
- Department of Medical Physics, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Pedrero
- Department of Medical Physics, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Pascau
- Department of Bioengineering and Aerospace Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Miguel Delgado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Aristu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Translational Research Department. Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR, Inserm, Signalisation, Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR, Inserm, Signalisation, Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schültke E, Jaekel F, Bartzsch S, Bräuer-Krisch E, Requardt H, Laissue JA, Blattmann H, Hildebrandt G. Good Timing Matters: The Spatially Fractionated High Dose Rate Boost Should Come First. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235964. [PMID: 36497446 PMCID: PMC9738329 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Monoplanar microbeam irradiation (MBI) and pencilbeam irradiation (PBI) are two new concepts of high dose rate radiotherapy, combined with spatial dose fractionation at the micrometre range. In a small animal model, we have explored the concept of integrating MBI or PBI as a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB), either at the beginning or at the end of a conventional, low-dose rate schedule of 5x4 Gy broad beam (BB) whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). MBI was administered as array of 50 µm wide, quasi-parallel microbeams. For PBI, the target was covered with an array of 50 µm × 50 µm pencilbeams. In both techniques, the centre-to-centre distance was 400 µm. To assure that the entire brain received a dose of at least 4 Gy in all irradiated animals, the peak doses were calculated based on the daily BB fraction to approximate the valley dose. The results of our study have shown that the sequence of the BB irradiation fractions and the microbeam SIB is important to limit the risk of acute adverse effects, including epileptic seizures and death. The microbeam SIB should be integrated early rather than late in the irradiation schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Schültke
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Felix Jaekel
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiooncology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Elke Bräuer-Krisch
- Biomedical Beamline ID 17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Herwig Requardt
- Biomedical Beamline ID 17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), 38043 Grenoble, France
| | | | - Hans Blattmann
- Independent Researcher, 5417 Untersiggenthal, Switzerland
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Bourhis J, Bailat C, Bochud F, Moeckli R. The minimal FLASH sparing effect needed to compensate the increase of radiobiological damage due to hypofractionation for late-reacting tissues. Med Phys 2022; 49:7672-7682. [PMID: 35933554 PMCID: PMC10087769 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Normal tissue (NT) sparing by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiations compared to conventional dose rate (CONV) irradiations while being isotoxic to the tumor has been termed "FLASH effect" and has been observed when large doses per fraction (d ≳ 5 Gy) have been delivered. Since hypofractionated treatment schedules are known to increase toxicities of late-reacting tissues compared to normofractionated schedules for many clinical scenarios at CONV dose rates, we developed a formalism based on the biologically effective dose (BED) to assess the minimum magnitude of the FLASH effect needed to compensate the loss of late-reacting NT sparing when reducing the number of fractions compared to a normofractionated CONV treatment schedule while remaining isoeffective to the tumor. METHODS By requiring the same BED for the tumor, we derived the "break-even NT sparing weighting factor" WBE for the linear-quadratic (LQ) and LQ-linear (LQ-L) models for an NT region irradiated at a relative dose r (relative to the prescribed dose per fraction d to the tumor). WBE was evaluated numerically for multiple values of d and r, and for different tumor and NT α/β-ratios. WBE was compared against currently available experimental data on the magnitude of the NT sparing provided by the FLASH effect for single fraction doses. RESULTS For many clinically relevant scenarios, WBE decreases steeply initially for d > 2 Gy for late-reacting tissues with (α/β)NT ≈ 3 Gy, implying that a significant NT sparing by the FLASH effect (between 15% and 30%) is required to counteract the increased radiobiological damage experienced by late-reacting NT for hypofractionated treatments with d < 10 Gy compared to normofractionated treatments that are equieffective to the tumor. When using the LQ model with generic α/β-ratios for tumor and late-reacting NT of (α/β)T = 10 Gy and (α/β)NT = 3 Gy, respectively, most currently available experimental evidence about the magnitude of NT sparing by the FLASH effect suggests no net NT sparing benefit for hypofractionated FLASH radiotherapy (RT) in the high-dose region when compared with WBE . Instead, clinical indications with more similar α/β-ratios of the tumor and dose-limiting NT toxicities [i.e., (α/β)T ≈ (α/β)NT ], such as prostate treatments, are generally less penalized by hypofractionated treatments and need consequently smaller magnitudes of NT sparing by the FLASH effect to achieve a net benefit. For strongly hypofractionated treatments (>10-15 Gy/fraction), the LQ-L model predicts, unlike the LQ model, a larger WBE suggesting a possible benefit of strongly hypofractionated FLASH RT, even for generic α/β-ratios of (α/β)T = 10 Gy and (α/β)NT = 3 Gy. However, knowledge on the isoeffect scaling for high doses per fraction (≳10 Gy/fraction) and its modeling is currently limited and impedes accurate and reliable predictions for such strongly hypofractionated treatments. CONCLUSIONS We developed a formalism that quantifies the minimal NT sparing by the FLASH effect needed to compensate for hypofractionation, based on the LQ and LQ-L models. For a given hypofractionated UHDR treatment scenario and magnitude of the FLASH effect, the formalism predicts if a net NT sparing benefit is expected compared to a respective normofractionated CONV treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
FLASHlab@PITZ: New R&D platform with unique capabilities for electron FLASH and VHEE radiation therapy and radiation biology under preparation at PITZ. Phys Med 2022; 104:174-187. [PMID: 36463582 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
At the Photo Injector Test facility at DESY in Zeuthen (PITZ), an R&D platform for electron FLASH and very high energy electron radiation therapy and radiation biology is being prepared (FLASHlab@PITZ). The beam parameters available at PITZ are worldwide unique. They are based on experiences from 20 + years of developing high brightness beam sources and an ultra-intensive THz light source demonstrator for ps scale electron bunches with up to 5 nC bunch charge at MHz repetition rate in bunch trains of up to 1 ms length, currently 22 MeV (upgrade to 250 MeV planned). Individual bunches can provide peak dose rates up to 1014 Gy/s, and 10 Gy can be delivered within picoseconds. Upon demand, each bunch of the bunch train can be guided to a different transverse location, so that either a "painting" with micro beams (comparable to pencil beam scanning in proton therapy) or a cumulative increase of absorbed dose, using a wide beam distribution, can be realized at the tumor. Full tumor treatment can hence be completed within 1 ms, mitigating organ movement issues. With extremely flexible beam manipulation capabilities, FLASHlab@PITZ will cover the current parameter range of successfully demonstrated FLASH effects and extend the parameter range towards yet unexploited short treatment times and high dose rates. A summary of the plans for FLASHlab@PITZ and the status of its realization will be presented.
Collapse
|
49
|
Lv Y, Lv Y, Wang Z, Lan T, Feng X, Chen H, Zhu J, Ma X, Du J, Hou G, Liao W, Yuan K, Wu H. FLASH radiotherapy: A promising new method for radiotherapy. Oncol Lett 2022; 24:419. [PMID: 36284652 PMCID: PMC9580247 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Among the treatments for malignant tumors, radiotherapy is of great significance both as a main treatment and as an adjuvant treatment. Radiation therapy damages cancer cells with ionizing radiation, leading to their death. However, radiation-induced toxicity limits the dose delivered to the tumor, thereby constraining the control effect of radiotherapy on tumor growth. In addition, the delayed toxicity caused by radiotherapy significantly harms the physical and mental health of patients. FLASH-RT, an emerging class of radiotherapy, causes a phenomenon known as the 'FLASH effect', which delivers radiotherapy at an ultra-high dose rate with lower toxicity to normal tissue than conventional radiotherapy to achieve local tumor control. Although its mechanism remains to be fully elucidated, this modality constitutes a potential new approach to treating malignant tumors. In the present review, the current research progress of FLASH-RT and its various particular effects are described, including the status of research on FLASH-RT and its influencing factors. The hypothetic mechanism of action of FLASH-RT is also summarized, providing insight into future tumor treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinghao Lv
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Yue Lv
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Tian Lan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Xuping Feng
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Jiang Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Xiao Ma
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Jinpeng Du
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Guimin Hou
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Wenwei Liao
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Kefei Yuan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| | - Hong Wu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Geulig LD, Obst-Huebl L, Nakamura K, Bin J, Ji Q, Steinke S, Snijders AM, Mao JH, Blakely EA, Gonsalves AJ, Bulanov S, van Tilborg J, Schroeder CB, Geddes CGR, Esarey E, Roth M, Schenkel T. Online charge measurement for petawatt laser-driven ion acceleration. THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 2022; 93:103301. [PMID: 36319346 DOI: 10.1063/5.0096423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Laser-driven ion beams have gained considerable attention for their potential use in multidisciplinary research and technology. Preclinical studies into their radiobiological effectiveness have established the prospect of using laser-driven ion beams for radiotherapy. In particular, research into the beneficial effects of ultrahigh instantaneous dose rates is enabled by the high ion bunch charge and uniquely short bunch lengths present for laser-driven ion beams. Such studies require reliable, online dosimetry methods to monitor the bunch charge for every laser shot to ensure that the prescribed dose is accurately applied to the biological sample. In this paper, we present the first successful use of an Integrating Current Transformer (ICT) for laser-driven ion accelerators. This is a noninvasive diagnostic to measure the charge of the accelerated ion bunch. It enables online estimates of the applied dose in radiobiological experiments and facilitates ion beam tuning, in particular, optimization of the laser ion source, and alignment of the proton transport beamline. We present the ICT implementation and the correlation with other diagnostics, such as radiochromic films, a Thomson parabola spectrometer, and a scintillator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D Geulig
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Lieselotte Obst-Huebl
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Kei Nakamura
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Jianhui Bin
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Qing Ji
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Sven Steinke
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Antoine M Snijders
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Jian-Hua Mao
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Eleanor A Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Anthony J Gonsalves
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Stepan Bulanov
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Jeroen van Tilborg
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Carl B Schroeder
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Cameron G R Geddes
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Eric Esarey
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Markus Roth
- Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schlossgartenstraße 9, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas Schenkel
- Accelerator Technology and Applied Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| |
Collapse
|