A possible link of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy with potassium channel deficit

Molecular and Cellular Involvement in CIPN

Many anti-cancer drugs, such as taxanes, platinum compounds, vinca alkaloids, and proteasome inhibitors, can cause chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). CIPN is a frequent and harmful side effect that affects the sensory, motor, and autonomic nerves, leading to pain, numbness, tingling, weakness, and reduced quality of life. The causes of CIPN are not fully known, but they involve direct nerve damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage, microtubule dysfunction, and altered ion channel activity. CIPN is also affected by genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors that modulate the risk and intensity of nerve damage. Currently, there are no effective treatments or prevention methods for CIPN, and symptom management is mostly symptomatic and palliative. Therefore, there is a high demand for better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in CIPN, as well as the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets. This review gives an overview of the current knowledge and challenges in the field of CIPN, focusing on the biological and molecular mechanisms underlying this disorder.

Sodium-Calcium Exchanger 2: A Pivotal Role in Oxaliplatin Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity and Axonal Damage?

Oxaliplatin (OHP)-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OIPN) is a frequent adverse event of colorectal cancer treatment. OIPN encompasses a chronic and an acute syndrome. The latter consists of transient axonal hyperexcitability, due to unbalance in Na+ voltage-operated channels (Na+VOC). This leads to sustained depolarisation which can activate the reverse mode of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger 2 (NCX2), resulting in toxic Ca2+ accumulation and axonal damage (ADa). We explored the role of NCX2 in in vitro and in vivo settings. Embryonic rat Dorsal Root Ganglia (DRG) organotypic cultures treated with SEA0400 (SEA), a NCX inhibitor, were used to assess neuroprotection in a proof-of-concept and pilot study to exploit NCX modulation to prevent ADa. In vivo, OHP treated mice (7 mg/Kg, i.v., once a week for 8 weeks) were compared with a vehicle-treated group (n = 12 each). Neurophysiological and behavioural testing were performed to characterise acute and chronic OIPN, and morphological analyses were performed to detect ADa. Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and western blotting (WB) analyses were also performed to demonstrate changes in NCX2 immunoreactivity and protein expression. In vitro, NCX inhibition was matched by ADa mitigation. In the in vivo part, after verifyingboth acute and chronic OIPN had ensued, we confirmed via immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and WB that a significant NCX2 alteration had ensued in the OHP group. Our data suggest NCX2 involvement in ADa development, paving the way to a new line of research to prevent OIPN.

Acute changes in nerve excitability following oxaliplatin treatment in mice

Oxaliplatin chemotherapy produces acute changes in peripheral nerve excitability in humans by modulating voltage-gated Na⁺ channel activity. However, there are few animal studies of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy that demonstrate similar changes in excitability. In the present study, we measured the excitability of motor and sensory caudal nerve in C57BL/6 mice after oxaliplatin injections either systemically (intraperitoneal) or locally (intramuscular at the base of the tail). As opposed to intraperitoneal administration of oxaliplatin, a single intramuscular injection of oxaliplatin produced changes in both motor and sensory axons. In motor axons, oxaliplatin caused a greater change in response to long-lasting depolarization and an upward shift in the recovery cycle, particularly at 24 h [depolarizing threshold electrotonus (TEd) 10-20 ms, P = 0.0095; TEd 90-100 ms, P = 0.0056) and 48 h (TEd 10-20 ms, P = 0.02; TEd 90-100 ms, P = 0.04) posttreatment. Oxaliplatin treatment also stimulated the production of afterdischarges in motor axons. These changes were transient and showed dose dependence. Mathematical modeling demonstrated that these changes could be accounted for by slowing inactivation of voltage-gated Na⁺ channels by 73.3% and reducing fast K⁺ conductance by 47% in motor axons. In sensory axons, oxaliplatin caused an increase in threshold, a reduction in peak amplitude, and greater threshold changes to strong hyperpolarizing currents on days 4 and 8. Thus, local administration of oxaliplatin produced clinically relevant changes in nerve excitability in mice and may provide an alternative approach for the study of acute oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present a novel mouse model of acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity that is comparable to clinical observations. Intramuscular injection of oxaliplatin produced acute changes in motor nerve excitability that were attributable to alterations in Na⁺ and K⁺ channel activity. Conversely, we were unable to show any significant changes in nerve excitability with systemic intraperitoneal injections of oxaliplatin. This study suggests that local intramuscular injection is a valid approach for modelling oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in animals.

Topiramate prevents oxaliplatin-related axonal hyperexcitability and oxaliplatin induced peripheral neurotoxicity

Oxaliplatin (OHP) Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity (OIPN) is one of the dose-limiting toxicities of the drug and these adverse effects limit cancer therapy with L-OHP, used for colorectal cancer treatment. Acute neurotoxicity consists of symptoms that are the hallmarks of a transient axonal hyperexcitability; chronic neurotoxicity has a clinical picture compatible with a length-dependent sensory neuropathy. Acute OIPN pathogenesis has been linked to sodium voltage-operated channels (Na + VOC) dysfunction and it has been advocated as a possible predisposing factor to chronic neurotoxicity. We tested if topiramate (TPM), a well-known Na + VOC modulator, was able to modify acute as well as chronic OIPN. The project was divided into two parts. In Experiment 1 we tested by means of Nerve Excitability Testing (NET) a cohort of female Wistar rats to assess TPM effects after a single OHP administration (5 mg/kg, iv). In Experiment 2 we assessed TPM effects after chronic OHP treatment (5 mg/kg, 2qw4ws, iv) using NET, nerve conduction studies (NCS), behavioral tests and neuropathology (caudal nerve morphometry and morphology and Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber [IENF] density). In Experiment 1 TPM was able to prevent OHP effects on Na + VOC: OHP treatment induced a highly significant reduction of the sensory nerve's threshold, during the superexcitability period (p-value = 0.008), whereas TPM co-administration prevented this effect. In Experiment 2 we verified that TPM was able to prevent not only acute phenomena, but also to completely prevent chronic OIPN. This latter observation was supported by a multimodal approach: in fact, only OHP group showed altered findings compared to CTRL group at a neurophysiological (proximal caudal nerve sensory nerve action potential [SNAP] amplitude, p-value = 0.001; distal caudal nerve SNAP amplitude, p-value<0.001, distal caudal nerve sensory conduction velocity, p-value = 0.04), behavioral (mechanical threshold, p-value 0.003) and neuropathological levels (caudal nerve fibers density, p-value 0.001; IENF density, p-value <0.001). Our data show that TPM is a promising drug to prevent both acute and chronic OIPN. These findings have a high translational potential, since they were obtained using outcome measures that match clinical practice and TPM is already approved for clinical use being free from detrimental interaction with OHP anticancer properties.

Clinical and preclinical perspectives on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): a narrative review

This review provides an update on the current clinical and preclinical understanding of chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The overview of the clinical syndrome includes a review of its assessment, diagnosis and treatment. CIPN is caused by several widely-used chemotherapeutics including paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, bortezomib. Severe CIPN may require dose reduction, or cessation, of chemotherapy, impacting on patient survival. While CIPN often resolves after chemotherapy, around 30% of patients will have persistent problems, impacting on function and quality of life. Early assessment and diagnosis is important, and we discuss tools developed for this purpose. There are no effective strategies to prevent CIPN, with limited evidence of effective drugs for treating established CIPN. Duloxetine has moderate evidence, with extrapolation from other neuropathic pain states generally being used to direct treatment options for CIPN. The preclinical perspective includes a discussion on the development of clinically-relevant rodent models of CIPN and some of the potentially modifiable mechanisms that have been identified using these models. We focus on the role of mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, immune cells and changes in ion channels from summary of the latest literature in these areas. Many causal mechanisms of CIPN occur simultaneously and/or can reinforce each other. Thus, combination therapies may well be required for most effective management. More effective treatment of CIPN will require closer links between oncology and pain management clinical teams to ensure CIPN patients are effectively monitored. Furthermore, continued close collaboration between clinical and preclinical research will facilitate the development of novel treatments for CIPN.

The origin of hyperpolarization based on the directional conduction of action potential using a model nerve cell system

In nerve cells, changes in local membrane potentials are generated and propagated along a nerve axon mainly by the function of K⁺ and Na⁺ channels. Generally, concurrent monitoring of multi-points on an axon is performed based on the voltage-clamp method. As the respective membrane potentials have been evaluated by considering the relations between the applied potential, the local current, and conductance, experimental values are not directly evaluated. We directly measured the actual membrane potentials and local currents of the respective cells using a nerve-model system comprising liquid-membrane cells. It was then proven that the action potential spreads along the axon toward the axon terminal due to the function of both the channel-type receptors in the synapse and voltage-gated Na⁺ channels on the axon, and that hyperpolarization cannot be caused by only the operation of the delayed-K⁺ and the voltage-gated Na⁺ channels.

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity is mediated through gap junction channels and hemichannels and can be prevented by octanol

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity (OIN) is a common complication of chemotherapy without effective treatment. In order to clarify the mechanisms of both acute and chronic OIN, we used an ex-vivo mouse sciatic nerve model. Exposure to 25 μM oxaliplatin caused a marked prolongation in the duration of the nerve evoked compound action potential (CAP) by nearly 1200% within 300 min while amplitude remained constant for over 20 h. This oxaliplatin effect was almost completely reversed by the gap junction (GJ) inhibitor octanol in a concentration-dependent manner. Further GJ blockers showed similar effects although with a narrower therapeutic window. To clarify the target molecule we studied sciatic nerves from connexin32 (Cx32) and Cx29 knockout (KO) mice. The oxaliplatin effect and neuroprotection by octanol partially persisted in Cx29 better than in Cx32 KO nerves, suggesting that oxaliplatin affects both, but Cx32 GJ channels more than Cx29 hemichannels. Oxaliplatin also accelerated neurobiotin uptake in HeLa cells expressing the human ortholog of Cx29, Cx31.3, as well as dye transfer between cells expressing the human Cx32, and this effect was blocked by octanol. Oxaliplatin caused no morphological changes initially (up to 3 h of exposure), but prolonged nerve exposure caused juxtaparonodal axonal edema, which was prevented by octanol. Our study indicates that oxaliplatin causes forced opening of Cx32 channels and Cx29 hemichannels in peripheral myelinated fibers leading to disruption of axonal K(+) homeostasis. The GJ blocker octanol prevents OIN at very low concentrations and should be further studied as a neuroprotectant.

Mechanisms involved in the development of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and painful condition seen in patients undergoing treatment with common agents such as vincristine, paclitaxel, oxaliplatin and bortezomib. The mechanisms of this condition are diverse, and include an array of molecular and cellular contributions. Current research implicates genetic predispositions to this condition, which then may influence cellular responses to chemotherapy. Processes found to be influenced during CIPN include increased expression of inflammatory mediators, primarily cytokines, which can create cascading effects in neurons and glia. Changes in ion channels and neurotransmission, as well as changes in intracellular signaling and structures have been implicated in CIPN. This review explores these issues and suggests considerations for future research.

Mechanisms of distal axonal degeneration in peripheral neuropathies

Peripheral neuropathy is a common complication of a variety of diseases and treatments, including diabetes, cancer chemotherapy, and infectious causes (HIV, hepatitis C, and Campylobacter jejuni). Despite the fundamental difference between these insults, peripheral neuropathy develops as a combination of just six primary mechanisms: altered metabolism, covalent modification, altered organelle function and reactive oxygen species formation, altered intracellular and inflammatory signaling, slowed axonal transport, and altered ion channel dynamics and expression. All of these pathways converge to lead to axon dysfunction and symptoms of neuropathy. The detailed mechanisms of axon degeneration itself have begun to be elucidated with studies of animal models with altered degeneration kinetics, including the slowed Wallerian degeneration (Wld(S)) and Sarm knockout animal models. These studies have shown axonal degeneration to occur through a programmed pathway of injury signaling and cytoskeletal degradation. Insights into the common disease insults that converge on the axonal degeneration pathway promise to facilitate the development of therapeutics that may be effective against other mechanisms of neurodegeneration.

Toxic and drug-induced peripheral neuropathies: updates on causes, mechanisms and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses publications highlighting current research on toxic, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies (CIPNs), and drug-induced peripheral neuropathies (DIPNs).

RECENT FINDINGS

The emphasis in clinical studies is on the early detection and grading of peripheral neuropathies, whereas recent studies in animal models have given insights into molecular mechanisms, with the discovery of novel neuronal, axonal, and Schwann cell targets. Some substances trigger inflammatory changes in the peripheral nerves. Pharmacogenetic techniques are underway to identify genes that may help to predict individuals at higher risk of developing DIPNs. Several papers have been published on chemoprotectants; however, to date, this approach has not been shown effective in clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Both length and nonlength-dependent neuropathies are encountered, including small-fiber involvement. The introduction of new diagnostic techniques, such as excitability studies, skin laser Doppler flowmetry, and pharmacogenetics, holds promise for early detection and to elucidate underlying mechanisms. New approaches to improve functions and quality of life in CIPN patients are discussed. Apart from developing less neurotoxic anticancer therapies, there is still hope to identify chemoprotective agents (erythropoietin and substances involved in the endocannabinoid system are promising) able to prevent or correct painful CIPNs.

Emerging trends in understanding chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major concern in oncology practice given the increasing number of cancer survivors and the lack of effective treatment. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy depends upon the anticancer drug used, but is commonly under-reported in clinical trials. Several animal models have been developed in an attempt to better characterize the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these CIPN and to find more specific treatments. Over the past two decades, three main trends have emerged from preclinical research on CIPN. There is a compelling body of evidence that neurotoxic anticancer drugs affect the peripheral sensory nerve by directly targeting the mitochondria and producing oxidative stress, by functionally impairing the ion channels and/or by triggering immunological mechanisms through the activation of satellite glial cells. These various neurotoxic events may account for the lack of effective treatment, as neuroprotection may probably only be achieved using a polytherapy that targets all of these mechanisms. The aim of this review is to describe the clinical features of CIPN and to summarize the recent trends in understanding its pathophysiology.

Treatment of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy by intravenous mangafodipir

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients receiving the platinum-based chemotherapy drug oxaliplatin develop peripheral neurotoxicity. Because this neurotoxicity involves ROS production, we investigated the efficacy of mangafodipir, a molecule that has antioxidant properties and is approved for use as an MRI contrast enhancer.

METHODS

The effects of mangafodipir were examined in mice following treatment with oxaliplatin. Neurotoxicity, axon myelination, and advanced oxidized protein products (AOPPs) were monitored. In addition, we enrolled 23 cancer patients with grade ≥ 2 oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in a phase II study, with 22 patients receiving i.v. mangafodipir following oxaliplatin. Neuropathic effects were monitored for up to 8 cycles of oxaliplatin and mangafodipir.

RESULTS

Mangafodipir prevented motor and sensory dysfunction and demyelinating lesion formation. In mice, serum AOPPs decreased after 4 weeks of mangafodipir treatment. In 77% of patients treated with oxaliplatin and mangafodipir, neuropathy improved or stabilized after 4 cycles. After 8 cycles, neurotoxicity was downgraded to grade ≥ 2 in 6 of 7 patients. Prior to enrollment, patients received an average of 880 ± 239 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. Patients treated with mangafodipir tolerated an additional dose of 458 ± 207 mg/m2 oxaliplatin despite preexisting neuropathy. Mangafodipir responders managed a cumulative dose of 1,426 ± 204 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. Serum AOPPs were lower in responders compared with those in nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that mangafodipir can prevent and/or relieve oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in cancer patients. Trial registration. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00727922. Funding. Université Paris Descartes, Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur, and Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.

Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in colorectal cancer: many questions with few answers

Oxaliplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent effective against advanced colorectal cancer. Unlike with other platinum-based agents, the main side effect of oxaliplatin is polyneuropathy. Oxaliplatin-induced polyneuropathy (OIPN) has a unique profile, which can be divided into acute and chronic neurotoxicity. Early identification of the neurotoxicity and alterations in dose or schedule for the medication could prevent the development of chronic symptoms, which, once established, may take many months or years to resolve or even persist throughout life with a substantial effect on quality of life. There is no doubt that the use of pharmacogenomic methods to identify genetic bases of interindividual differences in drug response has led to what is called tailoring treatment. Yet there are some challenges regarding the application of these differences. Many efforts have been made to prevent or treat OIPN. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the acute and chronic forms of OIPN will be a key component of future advances in the prevention and treatment of OIPN. The aim of this review is to highlight the clinical presentation, assessment, and management of OIPN, as well as the underlying pathophysiologic and pharmacogenomic background.

Internodal mechanism of pathological afterdischarges in myelinated axons

INTRODUCTION

Recent optical recordings of transmembrane potentials in the axons of pyramidal neurons have shown that the internodal action potentials (APs) predicted in our previous studies do exist. These novel processes are not well understood. In this study we aim to clarify electrical phenomena in peripheral myelinated axons (MAs).

METHODS

We used a multi-cable Hodgkin-Huxley-type model to simulate MAs with potassium channels that were either normal or inhibited along a short region of the internodal membrane. A brief stimulus was applied to the first node.

RESULTS

We demonstrated peculiarities in the internodal APs induced by a saltatory AP: They existed across internodal membranes, were detectable in periaxonal space but not in intracellular space, propagated continuously, collided near the mid-internodes, and produced internodal sources of afterdischarges.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the importance of the MA internodal regions as new therapeutic targets for avoiding afterdischarges provoked by reduced axonal fast potassium channel expression.