Malnutrition Impacts Health-Related Quality of Life in Cirrhosis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Malnutrition in solid organ transplant patients: A review of the literature

Screening for malnutrition is of vital importance for solid organ transplant candidates to optimize nutrition status before transplant, to improve clinical outcomes and to inform selection committees of nutritional contraindications and risks. There are multiple criteria and screening tools available for determining malnutrition diagnosis and risk. Registered Dietitian Nutritionists use these tools for nutrition assessments to quantify the severity of malnutrition, provide patient-centered interventions, and monitor progression. Many transplant centers in the United States utilize the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Adult Malnutrition Criteria, though there is limited research using these criteria specifically in the transplant population. Malnutrition, utilizing other diagnostic and screening tools, has been associated with important complications, including longer length of hospital stay, increased mortality, decreased quality of life, worsened end-stage organ progression, and decreased functional status. Malnutrition typically results from sarcopenia and cachexia, and can ultimately lead to frailty, causing further negative impacts on transplant outcomes. This literature review summarizes the current research on malnutrition in solid organ transplant candidates and provides recommendations for future research and current practice implications.

Comparison of the quality of life of patients with liver cirrhosis before and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Slovakia

Liver cirrhosis is associated with a poor quality of life (QOL). The COVID-19 pandemic has led to several restriction measures and psychosocial consequences whose impact on QOL has combined with that of cirrhosis in an unknown way. Therefore, we have used our cirrhosis registry to assess the quality of life before the pandemic (on the first admission to the tertiary liver unit) and during the most pronounced phase of the first lockdown. In this cross-sectional study conducted during the first lockdown in Slovakia (from April to May 2020), we have repeated the QOL measurement of QOL in cirrhotic patients previously enrolled in the RH7 registry. Patients who were alive (according to the national registry of deaths) were identified and contacted by phone with a structured and standardized interview led by trained professionals. The tool used for both QOL measurements (at enrolment in RH7 and during lockdown) was a standardized and validated EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The study included 97 patients, of which 37 (38.1%) were women and 60 (61.9%) were men. Responses were achieved from 75 patients (68.18%). In general, patients scored their quality of life significantly higher during the pandemic compared to examination at admission to RH7 (that is, at admission to our tertiary liver unit with cirrhosis) (p = 0.005). In particular, of the domains included in EQ-5D: (1) self-care was better during lockdown compared to the first record on admission to RH7 (p < 0.001). (2) the ability to perform daily activities has also improved during lockdown (p = 0.002). On the other hand, (3) pain and discomfort did not change significantly during the lockdown compared to the previous measurement (p = 0.882). (4) anxiety and depression were lower during lockdown compared to admission to RH7 (p = 0.01). The quality of life in patients with liver cirrhosis was better during the lockdown of SARS-CoV-2 compared to the previous measurement at admission to the tertiary liver unit.

Improvement of sarcopenia is beneficial for prognosis in cirrhotic patients after TIPS placement

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the improvement of sarcopenia and post-TIPS prognosis has not been fully investigated.

AIMS

To assess what level of sarcopenia improvement is required for potential benefits to post-TIPS prognosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 109 cirrhotic patients with sarcopenia who underwent TIPS between February 2016 and January 2021 were included. The change in skeletal muscle index (SMI) at 6 months post-TIPS was assessed and the correlations of SMI improvement with clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

During follow up, 59 (65.6%) patients reversed from sarcopenic to non-sarcopenic, and the cumulative mortality (8.5 % vs. 26.0%, log rank P = 0.013) and incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) (18.6% vs. 44.0%, log rank P = 0.004) in patients who reversed were significantly lower than who did not. SMI improvement rate was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality and OHE. In addition, the cumulative survival rate of patients with sarcopenia reversal or SMI improvement rate > 10.4% was significantly higher than that of patients with an SMI improvement rate ≤ 10.4% (92.5% vs. 58.6%, log rank P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Reversal of sarcopenia or significant SMI improvement by TIPS could reduce the risk of death and OHE.

The relationship between patient-reported health-related quality of life and malnutrition risk in cirrhosis: an observational cohort study

Patients with cirrhosis experience worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and attempts are warranted further exploration of modifiable factors to improve HRQoL. Data on the impact of malnutrition risk on HRQoL among cirrhosis are limited; thus, we aimed to strengthen understanding by clarifying the relationship between nutritional status and low HRQoL in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Consecutive inpatients with cirrhosis attending our department within a tertiary hospital were studied. Generic health profiles and malnutrition risk were evaluated by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT) score, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine association of malnutrition risk with low HRQoL. In this cohort of 364 patients with median age of 64 years and 49·5 % male, 55·5 % of the study population reported impairment pertinent to HRQoL in at least one dimension in terms of the EQ-5D. Moreover, malnutrition risk (RFH-NPT score: β coefficient = -0·114, P = 0·038) was proved to be independently associated with poor HRQoL in multiple analysis, after adjustment for significant variables like age, BMI and markers of decompensation. Notably, we found that health dimensions representing physical function (i.e. mobility, self-care and usual activities) are substantially affected, while malnourished patients reported less frequencies of complaints in other domain such as anxiety/depression. In conclusion, the risk of malnutrition assessed by the RFH-NPT score is independently associated with low HRQoL. It is operational to improve HRQoL by identifying patients at high malnutrition risk and providing timely nutrition treatment.

Low Health Literacy Is Associated With Frailty and Reduced Likelihood of Liver Transplant Listing: A Prospective Cohort Study

The effect of low health literacy (HL) on outcomes in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is largely unknown. The association of low HL on clinical outcomes was investigated in a prospective cohort of outpatients with ESLD undergoing liver transplantation (LT) evaluation. From 2014 to 2017, 276 patients underwent LT evaluation with assessments of liver disease severity, medical and psychosocial comorbidities, physical frailty, and malnutrition. Literacy was measured with the Newest Vital Sign, a brief validated assessment. Multivariate models assessed relationships between HL and clinical outcomes adjusting for clinical and psychosocial variables. The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium score of the study sample was 15 (interquartile range, 11-19), 71 (25.7%) of candidates were frail, 117 (42.4%) had malnutrition, 151 (54.7%) had hepatic encephalopathy, 104 (37.7%) had low HL, and 85 (39.2%) had marginal or poor social support. Adjusting for education level, socioeconomic factors, and severity of illness, low HL was independently associated with physical frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-8.59; P = 0.004) and not being wait-listed (aOR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.03-3.75; P = 0.04). Strong social support attenuated the relationship between low HL and not being wait-listed (aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.74-3.36; P = 0.24). Low HL is common and a largely unrecognized risk factor for poor health outcomes among patients with ESLD. Patient-oriented infrastructure and support are needed at the health system level to ensure all patients can successfully navigate the complex process of LT evaluation and wait-listing.