Preoperative Fasting Abbreviation With Whey Protein Reduces the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Association between risk of malnutrition defined by patient-generated subjective global assessment and adverse outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between the risk of malnutrition, as estimated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) numerical scores, and adverse outcomes in oncology patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTINGS

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CKNI, VIP, Sinomed and Wanfang databases. Studies that examined the association between the risk of malnutrition, as estimated by the PG-SGA numerical scores, and overall survival (OS) or postoperative complications in oncology patients were included. Patients were classified as low risk (PG-SGA ≤ 3), medium risk (PG-SGA 4-8) and high risk of malnutrition (PG-SGA > 8).

SUBJECT

Nineteen studies reporting on twenty articles (n 9286 patients).

RESULTS

The prevalence of medium and high risk of malnutrition ranged from 16·0 % to 71·6 %. A meta-analysis showed that cancer patients with medium and high risk of malnutrition had a poorer OS (adjusted hazard ratios (HR) 1·98; 95 % CI 1·77, 2·21) compared with those with a low risk of malnutrition. Stratified analysis revealed that the pooled HR was 1·55 (95 % CI 1·17, 2·06) for medium risk of malnutrition and 2·65 (95 % CI 1·90, 3·70) for high risk of malnutrition. Additionally, the pooled adjusted OR for postoperative complications was 4·65 (95 % CI 1·61, 13·44) for patients at medium and high risk of malnutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of medium and high risk of malnutrition, as estimated by the PG-SGA numerical scores, is significantly linked to poorer OS and an increased risk of postoperative complications in oncology patients.

Preoperative Snack Prescription: A Single-Centre Experience in Optimising Preoperative Fasting Time and Enhancing Guideline Adherence

Objectives Preoperative fasting plays a pivotal role in adequately preparing patients for anaesthesia and surgical procedures. However, it is imperative to consider not only the medical aspects but also patients' overall comfort, as this can significantly contribute to improved surgical outcome. The primary objective of this quality improvement project (QIP) is to provide healthcare professionals, including anaesthetists, surgeons, nurses, and stakeholders with information regarding insights required to embrace the concept of preoperative snack prescription as a strategy for enhancing patient-centred care. Methods This QIP was conducted in the vascular surgery department of a district general hospital in Wales, United Kingdom. A prospective analysis was conducted in two cycles, i.e., the pre-intervention group (PrIG) and post-intervention group (PoIG), with preoperative snacks such as biscuits, chips, or cakes, being prescribed to the PoIG. A total of 40 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study, with 20 patients participating in each cycle. The timing of preoperative meals, i.e., the closest preoperative breakfast, lunch, or dinner, preoperative snacks (for the PoIG), anaesthesia commencement, and surgical commencement were collected. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), in conjunction with Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States). Results In our QIP, the PrIG and PoIG comprised 40% (8 out of 20) and 35% (7 out of 20) female patients, respectively, with mean ages of 74 years (range, 61-86 years) and 61.3 years (range, 36-81 years). Within the PrIG, the mean duration from the preoperative meal to anaesthesia and surgery commencement was 17.8 hours (range, 14.6-22.5 hours) and 18.5 hours (range, 16.0-23.3 hours), respectively. In the PoIG, following the initiation of preoperative snack prescription, the mean time intervals between preoperative snack prescription and anaesthesia and surgery commencement were 10.9 hours (range, 6.5-16.0 hours) and 12.0 hours (range, 7.5-16.5 hours), respectively. Conclusions In summary, our QIP has successfully integrated preoperative snack prescription into the local hospital's preoperative care policy, prioritising the balance between patient safety and comfort. Based on our single-centre experience, we observed a significant reduction in the time interval between preoperative fasting and the initiation of anaesthesia, decreasing from 18.3 hours to 10.9 hours post-implementation of preoperative snacks. This QIP holds relevance for healthcare professionals as it underscores the benefits of shorter fasting periods, which contribute to heightened patient satisfaction and comfort.

Effect of a Personalized Enteral Nutrition Protocol on the Postoperative Nutritional Status in Patients Who Underwent Oral Cancer Surgery

Differences in the implementation of the perioperative nutrition guidelines and pathways by caregivers lead to differences in enteral nutrition provided to the patients. This study investigated the effect of a personalized enteral nutrition protocol on the postoperative nutritional status of patients who underwent oral cancer surgery at Zhejiang Ningbo NO. 2 Hospital. Those who underwent surgery between July 2017 and October 2018 received routine enteral nutrition based on the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (routine group), while those between November 2018 and August 2021 received personalized enteral nutrition based on the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment tool (personalized group). Seventy patients completed the study (routine group, n = 34; personalized group, n = 36). After surgery, the personalized group exhibited significantly greater improvements in serum albumin levels (P < 0.01) (on the 7th and 10th day) and hand grip strength (P < 0.01), higher self-care ability (P < 0.01), lower incidence of gastrointestinal reactions during enteral feeding (P < 0.05), and shorter hospital stay (P < 0.05) than the routine group. Therefore, a personalized enteral nutrition program might improve the postoperative nutritional status, shorten the hospital stay, and accelerate postoperative recovery in patients who underwent oral cancer surgery.

Extending the benefit of nutrition intervention beyond the operative setting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of the recent evidence on the potential of perioperative nutritional interventions to benefit adult patients undergoing head and neck and digestive procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Perioperative nutrition within multimodal prehabilitation programs improve postoperative outcomes. Perioperative fasting time can be reduced with beverages containing carbohydrate alone or blended with a nitrogenous source such as whey protein; this approach seems to be safe and improve outcome. The choice of protein-containing formula, as well as diet composition to be recommended early during the postoperative refeeding, can be optimized to reduce complications. Sarcopenia is an important risk factor for surgical patients, as such, prehabilitation along with preoperative nutrition is strongly advised. Perioperative supplementation with β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate to mitigate sarcopenia requires further investigation. Although perioperative nutritional interventions reduce healthcare costs, recent data suggest it has been scarcely prescribed.

SUMMARY

Nutritional intervention is key in multimodal programs of enhanced recovery after surgery to ensure better outcomes. Perioperative fasting should be shortened, and include clear fluids containing carbohydrates and protein, especially in the early postoperative period. Multimodal prehabilitation is key to mitigate sarcopenia. Action to improve knowledge on the cost-effectiveness of nutritional interventions in the perioperative setting are needed.

State of Rehabilitation Research in the Head and Neck Cancer Population: Functional Impact vs. Impairment-Focused Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of head and neck cancer (HNC) typically involves a morbid combination of surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. As the number of HNC survivors grows, there is growing interest in rehabilitation strategies to manage HNC-related comorbidity. In this review, we summarize the current state of HNC rehabilitation research.

RECENT FINDINGS

We have organized our review using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Function (ICF) model of impairment, activity, and participation. Specifically, we describe the current research on rehabilitation strategies to prevent and treat impairments including dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia, dysosmia, odynophagia, trismus, first bite syndrome, dysarthria, dysphonia, lymphedema, shoulder syndrome, cervicalgia, cervical dystonia and dropped head syndrome, deconditioning, and fatigue. We also discuss the broader impact of HNC-related impairment by exploring the state of rehabilitation literature on activity, participation, psychosocial distress, and suicidality in HNC survivors. We demonstrate that research in HNC rehabilitation continues to focus primarily on impairment-driven interventions. There remains a dearth of HNC rehabilitation studies directly examining the impact of rehabilitation interventions on outcomes related to activity and participation. More high-quality interventional studies and reviews are needed to guide prevention and treatment of functional loss in HNC survivors.