Early improvements of individual symptoms as a predictor of treatment response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia

Genotypic and Haplotypic Association of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase rs4680 and rs4818 Gene Polymorphisms with Particular Clinical Symptoms in Schizophrenia

Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) gene variants are involved in different neuropsychiatric disorders and cognitive impairments, associated with altered dopamine function. This study investigated the genotypic and haplotypic association of COMT rs4680 and rs4618 polymorphisms with the severity of cognitive and other clinical symptoms in 544 male and 385 female subjects with schizophrenia. COMT rs4818 G carriers were more frequent in male patients with mild abstract thinking difficulties, compared to CC homozygotes or C allele carriers. Male carriers of COMT rs4680 A allele had worse abstract thinking (N5) scores than GG carriers, whereas AA homozygotes were more frequent in male subjects with lower scores on the intensity of the somatic concern (G1) item, compared to G carriers. Male carriers of COMT rs4818-rs4680 GA haplotype had the highest scores on the G1 item (somatic concern), whereas GG haplotype carriers had the lowest scores on G2 (anxiety) and G6 (depression) items. COMT GG haplotype was less frequent in female patients with severe disturbance of volition (G13 item) compared to the group with mild symptoms, while CG haplotype was more frequent in female patients with severe then mild symptoms. These findings suggest the sex-specific genotypic and haplotypic association of COMT variants with a severity of cognitive and other clinical symptoms of schizophrenia.

Short-term antipsychotic treatment response in early-onset, typical-onset, and late-onset first episode schizophrenia

In schizophrenia, the age at illness onset may reflect genetic loading and predict prognosis. We aimed to compare the pre-treatment symptom profiles and clinical symptom responses to antipsychotic treatment of individuals with late-onset schizophrenia (LOS; onset age: 40-59 years) with individuals with early-onset schizophrenia (EOS; onset age < 18 years) or typical-onset schizophrenia (TOS; onset age: 18-39 years). We conducted an 8-week cohort study in inpatient departments of five mental health hospitals in five cities in China. We included 106 individuals with LOS, 80 with EOS, and 214 with TOS. Their onset of schizophrenia was within three years and the disorders were minimally treated. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to evaluate clinical symptoms at baseline and after 8 weeks of antipsychotic treatment. Mixed effect models were used to compare symptom improvement within eight weeks. Antipsychotic therapy reduced all PANSS factor scores in all three groups. LOS had significantly better improvement in PANSS positive factor scores than EOS at week 8 after adjusting for sex, duration of illness, dose equivalents of antipsychotics at baseline, sites as fixed effects, and individuals as random effects. LOS was associated with reduced positive factor scores at week 8 when receiving 1 mg olanzapine dose equivalent per 1 kg body weight compared with EOS or TOS. In conclusion, LOS had better early improvement of positive symptoms than EOS and TOS. Thus, personalized treatment for schizophrenia should consider the age of onset.

Divergence of dose-response with asenapine: a cluster analysis of randomized, double-blind, and placebo control study

BACKGROUND

Differences in psychiatric background and dose-response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia were examined based on efficacy and safety, using data obtained in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia were classified into three clusters by a cluster analysis based on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) subscores at baseline, using the data from a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PANSS Marder factor scores were calculated for each cluster. The efficacy of 10 or 20 mg/day of asenapine on PANSS score was used as the primary endpoint, with the incidence of adverse events evaluated as the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 529 asenapine-treated patients were classified into 3 clusters: Cluster-P with the higher scores in positive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and hostility/excitement, Cluster-N with higher scores in negative symptoms, and Cluster-L with overall lower scores. In Cluster-N and Cluster-L, both 10 and 20 mg/day groups showed significant improvement in PANSS scores, while only the 20 mg/day group showed a significant difference in Cluster-P. Cluster-N and Cluster-L had differences in the incidence of adverse events, but this was not seen in Cluster-P.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of asenapine 10 and 20 mg/day differed between the 3 clusters of patients. This suggests that background information regarding baseline psychiatric symptoms may affect the therapeutic response in patients with schizophrenia.

Molecular and neurocircuitry mechanisms of social avoidance

Humans and animals live in social relationships shaped by actions of approach and avoidance. Both are crucial for normal physical and mental development, survival, and well-being. Active withdrawal from social interaction is often induced by the perception of threat or unpleasant social experience and relies on adaptive mechanisms within neuronal networks associated with social behavior. In case of confrontation with overly strong or persistent stressors and/or dispositions of the affected individual, maladaptive processes in the neuronal circuitries and its associated transmitters and modulators lead to pathological social avoidance. This review focuses on active, fear-driven social avoidance, affected circuits within the mesocorticolimbic system and associated regions and a selection of molecular modulators that promise translational potential. A comprehensive review of human research in this field is followed by a reflection on animal studies that offer a broader and often more detailed range of analytical methodologies. Finally, we take a critical look at challenges that could be addressed in future translational research on fear-driven social avoidance.

Early improvements of individual symptoms as a predictor of treatment response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia

Aim

It is well accepted that early improvement with antipsychotics predicts subsequent response in patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has examined the contribution of individual symptoms rather than overall symptom severity as the predictors. Thus, we aimed to detect individual symptoms whose improvements could predict subsequent response in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with asenapine and examine whether a prediction model with individual symptoms would be superior to a model using overall symptom severity.

Methods

This study analyzed a dataset including 532 patients with schizophrenia enrolled in a 6‐week double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized trial of asenapine. Response to asenapine was defined as a ≥30% decrease in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline to week 6. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations among response and PANSS total/individual item score improvements at week 1 or week 2.

Results

Response was associated with early improvement in the following PANSS items: disturbance of volition, active social avoidance, poor impulse control at week 1; and active social avoidance, poor attention, lack of judgment and insight at week 2. Prediction accuracy was almost compatible between the model with individual symptoms and the model with PANSS total score both at weeks 1 and 2 (Nagelkerke R²: .51, .42 and .55, .54, respectively).

Conclusion

Early improvement in negative symptoms, poor attention and impulse control, and lack of insight, in particular predicted subsequent treatment response in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with asenapine as accurately as prediction based on overall symptom severity.

This study found that treatment response to asenapine was predicted by early improvements of individual symptoms such as negative symptoms, poor attention and impulse control, and lack of insight in patients with schizophrenia. In addition, prediction accuracy was almost comparable between the model with individual symptoms and the model with the PANSS total score, supporting the importance to assess both individual symptoms and the whole severity in the clinical settings.