Monitoring and Assessment of Neuropsychological Outcomes as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology

Teacher Perspectives of Pediatric Neuropsychology and Supporting Children With Chronic Health Conditions

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present study was to examine teachers' perceptions of neuropsychological reports broadly and their preparedness to support the educational needs of students with chronic health conditions.

METHOD

Teachers were selected from across the United States using stratified random sampling. 280 teachers (76.2% female; 58.4% public school; 53.9% rural setting) completed an anonymous electronic survey via Qualtrics.

RESULTS

Half of the teachers were familiar with neuropsychology and previously read a neuropsychological report, which the majority found useful with a preference toward shorter reports. Most found listed recommendations to be appropriate, but half of teachers identified limited resources as a barrier to implementation. Teachers reported limited education, training, and comfort for providing accommodations to children with chronic health conditions, which was significantly lower for cancer, congenital heart disease, and sickle cell disease. Older teachers, more years of experience, and special education teachers demonstrated significantly higher levels of education, training, and comfort. Frequency of implementing accommodations was significantly negatively correlated with perceived burden and positively correlated with perceived benefit across most accommodations. Teachers reported a preference for single-page handouts and speaking directly to neuropsychologists about the specific learning needs of students with chronic health conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight areas for future research and intervention regarding teacher's preparedness for working with children with chronic health groups and opportunities to improve communication between neuropsychologists and teachers to ultimately improve access to educational supports and overall quality of life of students with chronic health conditions.

Children with non-central nervous system tumors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy are at risk for hearing loss and cognitive impairments

Background

Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) with chemotherapy induced sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are at risk for neurocognitive impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between SNHL and cognitive function among CCS.

Procedure

Inclusion: non-CNS solid tumor diagnosis; history of platinum chemotherapy (cisplatin and/or carboplatin); 8-17 years of age; off anti-cancer treatment for ≥6 months; and English speaking. Exclusion: history of intrathecal chemotherapy, cranial radiation, or baseline neurocognitive disorder. Participants completed the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery at enrollment. T-tests were used to compare participants with normal hearing to those with hearing loss and the total sample with established Toolbox normative data (mean: 50; SD: 10).

Results

Fifty-seven individuals enrolled; 52 completed full cognitive testing. Participants were on average 12.2 years of age and 7.0 years since treatment completion. Twenty-one participants (40%) received cisplatin, 27 (52%) carboplatin, and 4 (8%) received both. Fifteen participants (29%) demonstrated SNHL based on the better ear. CCS, regardless of the presence or absence of SNHL, demonstrated significantly lower mean cognitive skills compared to the normative sample in attention, executive function, language- vocabulary and oral reading, processing speed, and fluid, crystallized and total composite scores (all p < 0.01). Participants with SNHL had significantly lower crystallized composite (vocabulary, oral reading) than those with normal hearing (41.9 vs. 47.2, p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.62).

Conclusions

CCS at risk for platinum induced hearing loss but without cranial radiation or intrathecal chemotherapy exposure demonstrate impaired cognitive skills and those with SNHL demonstrate lower crystallized composite scores.

Case identification of non-traumatic brain injury in youth using linked population data

BACKGROUND

Population-level administrative data provides a cost-effective means of monitoring health outcomes and service needs of clinical populations. This study aimed to present a method for case identification of non-traumatic brain injury in population-level data and to examine the association with sociodemographic factors.

METHODS

An estimated resident population of youth aged 0-24 years was constructed using population-level datasets within the New Zealand Integrated Data Infrastructure. A clinical consensus committee reviewed the International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Editions codes and Read codes for inclusion in a case definition. Cases were those with at least one non-traumatic brain injury code present in the five years up until 30 June 2018 in one of four databases in the Integrated Data Infrastructure. Rates of non-traumatic brain injury were examined, both including and excluding birth injury codes and across age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic deprivation groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1 579 089 youth aged 0-24 years on 30 June 2018, 8154 (0.52%) were identified as having one of the brain injury codes in the five-years to 30 June 2018. Rates of non-traumatic brain injury were higher in males, children aged 0-4 years, Māori and Pacific young people, and youth living with high levels of social deprivation.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a comprehensive method for case identification of non-traumatic brain injury using national population-level administrative data.

Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: CNS Tumors

Tumors of CNS are common in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). As the second leading cause of cancer-related death, CNS tumors in AYAs require improved clinical management. In this review, we discussed the current diagnostic approaches and recommended management strategies for malignant tumors in adult-type (IDH-mutant gliomas) and pediatric-type gliomas (pediatric high-grade gliomas), ependymoma and medulloblastoma, which commonly occur in AYAs. The impact of advanced molecular diagnostic approaches on the understanding of tumor biology of AYA CNS tumors is emphasized. To enhance participation in clinical trials, which poses a unique challenge in AYAs with CNS tumors, we propose encouraging referrals to neuro-oncology specialty care and improving collaboration between oncologists who care for both pediatric and adult patients. This will ensure better representation of AYA patients in research studies. Finally, we discussed the importance of considering neurocognitive and psychological function in AYAs with CNS tumor.

Neurocognitive and psychosocial outcomes in survivors of childhood leukemia with Down syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a developmentally tailored neurocognitive assessment in survivors of childhood acute leukemia with Down syndrome (DS-leukemia). A secondary aim was to compare outcomes in the DS-leukemia group to a historical comparison group of individuals with DS and no history of childhood cancer.

METHODS

Survivors of DS-leukemia (n = 43; 56% male, mean [SD] age at diagnosis = 4.3 [4.5] years; age at evaluation = 15 [7.9] years) completed a neurocognitive assessment battery that included direct measures of attention, executive function, and processing speed, and proxy ratings of attention problems and executive dysfunction. Direct assessment outcomes were compared to a historical comparison cohort of individuals with DS and no history of childhood cancer (DS-control; n = 117; 56% male, mean [SD] age at evaluation = 12.7 [3.4] years).

RESULTS

Rates of valid task completion ranged from 54% to 95%, suggesting feasibility for most direct assessment measures. Compared to the DS-control group, the DS-leukemia group had significantly lower completion rates on measures of executive function (p = 0.008) and processing speed (p = 0.018) compared to the DS-control group. There were no other significant group differences in completion rates. Compared to the DS-control group, the DS-leukemia group had significantly more accurate performance on two measures of executive function (p = 0.032; p = 0.005). Compared to the DS-control group, the DS-leukemia group had significantly more problems with executive function as identified on proxy ratings (6.5% vs. 32.6%, p = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at increased risk for developing acute leukemia compared to the general population but are systematically excluded from neurocognitive outcome studies among leukemia survivors. This study demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating neurocognitive late effects in leukemia survivors with DS using novel measures appropriate for populations with intellectual developmental disorder.

Parent ratings of executive functioning in pediatric survivors of medulloblastoma and pilocytic astrocytoma

The present study compared parent-rated executive functioning in pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) and pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) survivors. Although standard care for both includes surgical resection, children with MB additionally receive chemotherapy and craniospinal irradiation. Given well-documented neurocognitive late effects associated with the latter, we anticipated poor parent-reported executive functioning in MB survivors. Parents/guardians of 36 MB survivors and 20 PA survivors completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF). PA survivors were younger at diagnosis (t[51.97] = 3.07, p < .001, d = 0.86) and demonstrated higher IQ (t[54] = -3.51, p < .001, d = 0.95). However, relative to the MB group, the PA group was rated as having significantly more problems on all BRIEF scales (all p ≤ .05; d = 0.30 - 1.10), except the Shift scale. Additionally, all mean BRIEF scores for MB survivors were within normal limits, whereas for PA survivors, all mean BRIEF scores except for Organization of Materials were significantly discrepant from normative means. Overall, PA survivors were rated as demonstrating poorer executive function than MB survivors. Five theories are discussed as possible explanations for these surprising findings: two related to group differences, two related to potential sources of parental bias, and one related to the nature of questionnaire-based assessment. All these theories represent directions for future research. Parent questionnaires such as the BRIEF may have real-world implications for pediatric brain tumor survivors. Future research should explore factors affecting parent ratings of executive functioning in these populations, along with comparison to performance-based measures.

Impaired neurocognitive functioning 3 months following diagnosis of high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer diagnosis. Cognitive late effects develop in 20%-40% of ALL survivors, but the course of declines is unclear. The aim of this paper is to characterize cognitive functioning, and its association with patient-reported outcomes, early in treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 483 children with high-risk ALL, aged 6-12 years at diagnosis, consented to the neurocognitive study embedded in a prospective therapeutic trial, Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL1131. A computerized neurocognitive battery (Cogstate) was administered 3 months post diagnosis assessing reaction time, visual attention, working memory, visual learning, and executive functioning. Parent-reported executive functioning and patient-reported physical symptoms were also collected.

RESULTS

Data from 390 participants (mean age at diagnosis = 9.2 years, 55.4% male) were obtained. Relatively few patients reported pain (16.0%) or nausea (22.6%), but a majority (68.5%) reported feeling at least some fatigue at testing. Mean Cogstate Z-scores were within normal limits across tasks; however, rates of impairment (Z-scores ≤ -1.5) for reaction time, working memory, visual learning, and visual attention were all higher than expected compared to the standardization sample. Patients reporting fatigue were significantly more likely to have impaired reaction time and visual attention compared to those reporting no fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Findings support feasibility of computerized cognitive assessments and suggest higher-than-expected rates of impaired cognitive performance early during treatment for pediatric ALL, notably within 3 months of diagnosis, suggesting intervention efforts may be indicated. These results also highlight acute factors that may impact reliability of "baseline" assessments conducted soon after diagnosis.

Neurocognitive and Psychological Outcomes among Children and Adolescents with Brain Tumors: Development of an Observational and Longitudinal Prospective Study Protocol

Children and adolescents affected by brain tumors are at risk for neuropsychological sequelae that need to be evaluated in order to plan adequate rehabilitation programs, and to support their development and recovery. This work aims to describe an innovative prospective observational study protocol for the early evaluation and monitoring over time of neuropsychological outcomes in this pediatric population. Pediatric patients aged 3-17 with a brain tumor diagnosis will be assessed through the use of a battery of Italian standardized neuropsychological tests, with good psychometric properties and age-appropiate, at three different time points of their clinical course: at diagnosis and before surgery (T0), after surgical removal and before the start of potential adjuvant therapies (T1), and at the one-year follow-up after potential adjuvant therapies (T2). This study will allow clinicians to support the neuropsychological development of these children by promoting appropriate and timely rehabilitation and educational programs from the early phases of their clinical course.

Implications of age at lesion onset for neuropsychological outcomes: A systematic review focusing on focal brain lesions

Theories of the relation between age at lesion onset and outcomes posit different views of the young brain: resilient and plastic (i.e., the so-called "Kennard Principle"), or vulnerable (i.e., the Early Vulnerability Hypothesis). There is support for both perspectives in previous research and questions about the "best" or "worst" times to sustain brain injury remain. Here, we present a systematic review investigating the influence of age at focal brain lesion onset on cognitive functioning. This systematic review identifies and qualitatively synthesizes empirical studies from 1985 to 2021 that investigated age at lesion onset as a variable of interest associated with neuropsychological outcomes. A total of 45 studies were identified from PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. Almost all studies indicated that brain injury earlier in the developmental period predicts worse cognitive outcomes when compared to onset either later in the developmental period or in adulthood. More specifically, the overwhelming majority of studies support an "earlier is worse" model for domains of intellect, processing speed, attention and working memory, visuospatial and perceptual skills, and learning and memory. Relatively more variability in outcomes exists for domains of language and executive functioning. Outcomes for all domains are influenced by various other age and injury variables (e.g., lesion size, lesion laterality, chronicity, a history of epilepsy). Continued interdisciplinary understanding and communication about the influence of age at lesion onset on neuropsychological outcomes will aid in promoting the best possible outcomes for patients.

A joint international consensus statement for measuring quality of survival for patients with childhood cancer

The aim of treating childhood cancer remains to cure all. As survival rates improve, long-term health outcomes increasingly define quality of care. The International Childhood Cancer Outcome Project developed a set of core outcomes for most types of childhood cancers involving relevant international stakeholders (survivors; pediatric oncologists; other medical, nursing or paramedical care providers; and psychosocial or neurocognitive care providers) to allow outcome-based evaluation of childhood cancer care. A survey among healthcare providers (n = 87) and online focus groups of survivors (n = 22) resulted in unique candidate outcome lists for 17 types of childhood cancer (five hematological malignancies, four central nervous system tumors and eight solid tumors). In a two-round Delphi survey, 435 healthcare providers from 68 institutions internationally (response rates for round 1, 70-97%; round 2, 65-92%) contributed to the selection of four to eight physical core outcomes (for example, heart failure, subfertility and subsequent neoplasms) and three aspects of quality of life (physical, psychosocial and neurocognitive) per pediatric cancer subtype. Measurement instruments for the core outcomes consist of medical record abstraction, questionnaires and linkage with existing registries. This International Childhood Cancer Core Outcome Set represents outcomes of value to patients, survivors and healthcare providers and can be used to measure institutional progress and benchmark against peers.

Tumor region associated with specific processing speed outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Processing speed (PS) is a vulnerable cognitive skill in pediatric cancer survivors as a consequence of treatments and, less consistently, tumor region. Studies conventionally examine graphomotor PS; emerging research suggests other aspects of PS may be impacted. This study examined types of PS in pediatric brain tumor survivors to determine which aspects are impaired. Given discordance across studies, we additionally investigated the relationship between brain region and PS.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 167 pediatric brain tumor patients (100 supratentorial). PS (oral naming, semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, motor speed, graphomotor speed, visual scanning) was gathered via clinical neuropsychological assessment. To examine PS by region, infratentorial and supratentorial groups were matched on age at diagnosis and neuropsychological assessment, and time since diagnosis.

RESULTS

The whole sample performed below normative means on measures of oral naming (p < .001), phonemic fluency (p < .001), motor speed (p = .03), visual scanning (p < .001), and graphomotor speed (p < .001). Only oral naming differed by region (p = .03), with infratentorial tumors associated with slower performance. After controlling for known medical and demographic risk factors, brain region remained a significant predictor of performance (p = .04). Among the whole sample, greater than expected proportions of patients with impairment (i.e., >1 standard deviation below the normative mean) were seen across all PS measures. Infratentorial tumors had higher rates of impairments across all PS measures except phonemic fluency.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate pediatric brain tumor survivors demonstrate weaknesses in multiple aspects of PS, suggesting impairments are not secondary to peripheral motor slowing alone. Additionally, tumor region may predict some but not all neuropsychological outcomes in this population.

Feasibility of serial neurocognitive assessment using Cogstate during and after therapy for childhood leukemia

PURPOSE

Neurocognitive impairment is frequently observed among survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) within the domains of attention, working memory, processing speed, executive functioning, and learning and memory. However, few studies have characterized the trajectory of treatment-induced changes in neurocognitive function beginning in the first months of treatment, to test whether early changes predict impairment among survivors. If correct, we hypothesize that those children who are most susceptible to early impairment would be ideal subjects for clinical trials testing interventions designed to protect against treatment-related neurocognitive decline.

METHODS

In this pilot study, we prospectively assessed neurocognitive functioning (attention, working memory, executive function, visual learning, and processing speed), using the Cogstate computerized battery at six time points during the 2 years of chemotherapy treatment and 1-year post-treatment (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium protocol 11-001; NCT01574274).

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with ALL consented to serial neurocognitive testing. Of the 31 participants who remained on study through the final time point, 1 year after completion of chemotherapy, 28 (90%) completed at least five of six planned Cogstate testing time points. Performance and completion checks indicated a high tolerability (≥ 88%) for all subtests. One year after completion of treatment, 10 of 29 patients (34%) exhibited neurocognitive function more than 2 standard deviations below age-matched norms on one or more Cogstate subtests.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial collection of neurocognitive data (within a month of diagnosis with ALL, during therapy, and 1-year post-treatment) is feasible and can be informative for evaluating treatment-related neurocognitive impairment.

Strategies to improve communication about neurocognitive impacts in pediatric oncology: Quality improvement findings

BACKGROUND

Neurocognitive deficits are common among children who receive central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy for childhood cancer. Parents report that they lack information from and communication with oncology providers about neurocognitive impacts of therapy. Furthermore, oncology providers report they lack training and institutional support to appropriately address the neurocognitive needs of these patients/families.

METHODS

A parent/provider stakeholder informed, quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to educate providers about neurocognitive impacts, increase parent/provider communication, and improve adherence to supportive care guidelines for neuropsychological assessment for children receiving CNS-directed therapy. A 1-h Continuing Medical Education (CME) course was developed to educate providers about neurocognitive impacts and their relation to schooling. A provider-focused electronic medical record (EMR) strategy was used to deliver parent stakeholder-informed return-to-school "roadmaps," with prompts to scaffold parent/provider communication and enhance documentation of findings.

RESULTS

Hospital-based CME sessions were attended by 76% (41 out of 54) of providers from our institution. Among the 34 who completed both pretest and posttest, the mean knowledge score improved from 56% at pretest to 74% at posttest. Compliance with the EMR strategy was 80% and there was a 42% increase in neuropsychological assessment referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that this QI project is an example of a successful parent/provider stakeholder collaboration that achieved demonstrable positive change in the areas of provider knowledge, patient/provider communication, and alignment of neuropsychological assessment referrals with existing guidelines. Our results confirm that improving knowledge, communication, and compliance with neuropsychological standards of care is possible with this evidence-based approach.

The Impact of Intensified CNS-Directed Therapy on Neurocognitive Outcomes in Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated Without Cranial Irradiation

PURPOSE

Findings from St Jude Total Therapy Study 16 (Total 16) showed early intensification of triple intrathecal therapy (ITT) improved CNS disease control for children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at the greatest risk of CNS relapse. We examined the impact of this treatment on end-of-therapy neurocognitive outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 400 (83.5%) of 479 eligible patients treated with Total 16 risk-directed chemotherapy completed protocol-directed neurocognitive testing at the end of therapy. Intensified ITT was defined as ≥ 21 cumulative doses for patients with low-risk ALL (n = 70/194) and ≥ 27 doses for those with standard-to-high risk ALL (n = 81/206).

RESULTS

Compared with age-normative expectations, the overall group had significantly lower estimated intelligence quotient (P < .0001), attention (P = .0051), working memory (P = .0001), processing speed (P = .0002), fine motor speed (P = .0001), and math (P = .0087). Caregiver ratings of patient functioning showed elevated risk for problems in attention (P = .0173), executive function (P = .0001), and adaptive skills (P = .0001). Among the low-risk treatment group, there were no significant differences between patients treated with or without intensified ITT (all P's >.10). Among patients with standard-to-high risk ALL, those treated with intensified ITT had poorer working memory (P = .0328) and fine motor speed (P = .0403), and elevated ratings of inattention (P = .0189) and executive dysfunction (P = .0245). In the standard-to-high risk group, females treated with intensified ITT had lower working memory scores. Public insurance status was associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Standard-to-high risk patients treated with intensified ITT are at moderately increased risk for neurocognitive problems. The findings suggest a threshold effect for ITT exposure, which can inform the design of future clinical trials and approaches to neurocognitive monitoring and intervention.

Schulische Reintegration von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit einem ZNS-Tumor

Zusammenfassung: Unterstützung bei der schulischen Reintegration wird als standard of care in der pädiatrischen Onkologie definiert. Ziel ist die Bereitstellung von Informationen und die Koordination der Kommunikation zwischen Patient_in/Familie, Schule und Krankenhaus. Dies ist von entscheidender Bedeutung für Schüler_innen mit Tumoren des Zentralnervensystems (ZNS), insbesondere in der Nachsorge, da sie eine Risikogruppe für Spätfolgen darstellen. Um die Kooperation zu verbessern, wurden mehrere praktische Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten eingeführt. Im Rahmen des vorgestellten Pilotprojekts wurde darüber hinaus ein Webinar konzipiert und evaluiert, das speziell auf die Fragen von externen Lehrer_innen eingeht. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass eine Online-Informationsveranstaltung das notwendige Wissen und die Zusammenarbeit verbessern kann, verdeutlichen gleichzeitig aber auch die Wichtigkeit der kontinuierlichen Unterstützung in Form von Expert_innen für schulische Reintegration, um Schüler_innen mit ZNS-Tumoren angemessen zu begleiten.

Neuropsychological surveillance model for survivors of pediatric cancer: A descriptive report of methodology and feasibility

Objective: Neuropsychological late effects of pediatric cancer may not become apparent for years after therapy; therefore, serial monitoring is necessary for detecting changes to ensure timely intervention. Unfortunately, lack of access to neuropsychologists, increased patient volume, insurance authorization and reimbursement issues, time required for neuropsychological evaluation, and practice effects related to repeat testing present many challenges to provision of neuropsychological care for survivors of childhood cancer. Models involving surveillance and monitoring have been proposed, though minimal data exist related to the implementation and feasibility of such models. Method: In this descriptive feasibility study, the Neuropsychology Consult Clinic (NCC) at Children's Hospital Los Angeles is presented, outlining a methodology and algorithm for neuropsychological surveillance of survivors of non-CNS pediatric cancer and an account of the first three years of clinic implementation. Participants included 215 survivors (x̅ age = 5.6 years), including 75.3% Latinx patients. Results: The overall clinic implementation was found to be feasible, with approximately 75% of patients "passing" the screening and 25% "failing" the screening. Clinical judgment only conflicted with the algorithm 8.6% of the time. However, several limitations to feasibility were noted, including validity concerns and ability/time to complete parent-reported outcomes using Spanish forms, as well as access to bilingual examiners. Conclusions: These preliminary data support the feasibility of the NCC model with limitations as outlined above. This is the first phase in a multiphase plan to develop an appropriate screening clinic for survivors of pediatric cancer, with the next phase focusing on sensitivity/specificity of measures.

The clinical utility of the Children's Communication Checklist-2 in children with early childhood traumatic brain injury

ObjectivePediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with long-term cognitive and behavioral deficits. Social communication impairments are common and impact functional outcomes, such as social engagement and academic performance. There are many barriers to identifying social communication deficits following TBI, including the absence of a standardized parent-reported communication measure for use in this population. The Children's Communication Checklist-Second Edition (CCC-2) has demonstrated utility in identifying communication deficits in diagnoses other than TBI. This study investigated the clinical utility of the CCC-2's social communication scales in children with TBI. Method: 203 children who sustained TBI or orthopedic injuries between the ages of 36 and 83 months were recruited as part of a larger, longitudinal study. We analyzed social communication subscale scores from the CCC-2 an average of 3.5 years postinjury. We used binary logistic regression analyses to examine the measure's accuracy in classifying children with and without social communication deficits on other measures of pragmatic language and social competence. Correlation analyses and linear mixed models were used to examine the construct validity of the CCC-2. Results: The CCC-2 was able to accurately classify those with and without pragmatic language impairments on the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language 92% of the time (sensitivity = 55%) and 96% of the time on the Home and Community Social Behavior scale (sensitivity = 72%). The CCC-2 demonstrated strong correlations with and predictive validity for measures of social communication and competence. Conclusions: The findings offer support for the clinical utility of the CCC-2 in the pediatric TBI population.

The Role of Psychology in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases

Pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases that can have a chronic unpredictable disease course that can negatively affect mood, functioning, and quality of life. Given the range of difficulties faced in managing PRDs, as well as the psychosocial issues youth with these diseases experience, pediatric psychologists can be well suited to address concerns that arise in care for youth with PRDs including adherence, cognitive assessment, pain management, functional disability, and mood. Potential ways that pediatric psychologists can address these concerns and be embedded within an interdisciplinary treatment plan for youth with PRDs are described.

CNS-Directed Cancer Treatment and Child Adjustment: Moderating Effects of Maternal Parenting

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether maternal parenting behaviors (i.e., warmth, behavioral/psychological control) moderate the association between central nervous system (CNS)-directed treatment and adjustment among pediatric cancer survivors at 3 years post-diagnosis or relapse.

METHODS

Three years after their child's cancer diagnosis or relapse, mothers (N = 84) reported on their child's academic and social competence, as well as their internalizing and externalizing problems. Children (N = 84; Mage = 13.21 years, 52.4% male) reported on maternal parenting behaviors. Using medical chart data, children were separated into CNS (i.e., received cranial radiation, intrathecal chemotherapy, and/or neurosurgery; N = 45) or non-CNS-directed treatment (N = 39) groups. Twelve moderation models were tested when examining two-way interactions between CNS treatment group and maternal parenting behaviors.

RESULTS

Children in the CNS-directed treatment group demonstrated significantly worse academic and social competence. Moderation analyses revealed four significant two-way interactions between CNS treatment group and maternal parenting behaviors when predicting children's adjustment. High levels of maternal behavioral control buffered the negative impact of CNS-directed treatment on children's social competence. In addition, maternal warmth had a contrasting effect, as CNS-directed treatment was associated with worse academic competence at high levels of warmth. Analyses with psychological control revealed that low levels of this parenting style were not protective against internalizing or externalizing problems among those with CNS-directed treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Children who receive CNS-directed treatment may benefit from a different pattern of parenting during early cancer survivorship. Findings highlight the importance of considering the broader family context when conceptualizing the impact of illness-related factors on adjustment among pediatric cancer survivors.

Neurocognitive Functions Before and After Radiotherapy in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors

BACKGROUND

The numbers of pediatric brain tumor survivors are increasing due to improved treatment protocols and multimodal treatments. Many survivors have neurocognitive sequelae, especially after radiotherapy. Neuropsychologic assessment is therefore essential to interpret clinical outcome, evaluate treatments protocol, and implement rehabilitation interventions. The overall aim of this study was to describe neurocognitive functions before and after radiotherapy. We also aimed to explore potential confounding risk factors that could affect the interpretation of radiotherapy-induced neurocognitive decline.

METHODS

Fifty pediatric brain tumor survivors who had received radiotherapy (five years or more ago) were included. Clinical characteristics, potential confounding risk factors, radiotherapy plans, and neurocognitive functions on intelligence quotient (IQ) and neuropsychologic measurements were analyzed before and after radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Neurocognitive functions were affected before radiotherapy and were progressively aggravated thereafter. The last neuropsychologic assessment after radiotherapy varied between two and 139 months. Nineteen patients were tested five years after radiotherapy, and 90% of them performed ≥1 S.D. below the normative mean on IQ measurements. Several potential confounding risk factors including those induced by radiotherapy were associated with lower performance on perceptual function, working memory, and processing speed. Longer time after radiotherapy was particularly associated with lower performance on working memory and processing speed. Importantly, the neuropsychologic assessments revealed more comprehensive problems than could be inferred from IQ measurements alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underpins the importance of systematic and structured neuropsychologic assessment before and after radiotherapy. The timing of the assessment is important, and potential confounding risk factors need to be identified to better evaluate radiotherapy-induced neurocognitive decline.

Addressing Schooling in Children With Cancer-It's Everybody's Job, So It's Nobody's Job: An Explanatory Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Background: Neurocognitive deficits from childhood cancer treatment are common, long-standing, and negatively impact multiple domains of life leading to challenges with schooling and education. The purpose of this study is to describe caregiver-reported experiences of neurocognitive effects from therapy and to understand the roles clinicians play in this domain in the United States. Methods: An explanatory mixed-methods study of 174 caregivers of children with cancer provided insight into how clinicians provided information on neurocognitive effects of treatment and their experiences with school-related resources. Clinicians provided descriptions of how they provide this information and assist families with accessing services or transition back to school after therapy. Results: Caregivers identified that physicians, nurses, and social workers primarily provide information regarding neurocognitive effects of treatment. Over half (55.9%) of families seek additional information elsewhere and 49.4% report doing so because the information they received from their team was inadequate. Nearly 40% of caregivers report accessing school supports feels like a constant fight and over 40% were not offered homebound educational services by their school. Qualitative interviews with providers found that clinicians focus on therapy-related physical symptoms of treatment and only discuss neurocognitive effects when prompted by families or when children are returning to school. Discussion: Clinicians' focus on physical symptoms and just-in-time thinking when it comes to providing education or school-related services may explain why families endorse infrequent education on the topic and challenges with school reintegration. Improved education for clinicians on this topic, integration of interdisciplinary teams, and new clinical practice models may improve the family experience.

Changes in executive function in pediatric brain tumor survivors

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric oncology survivors are at risk for executive function (EF) and working memory (WM) deficits, which can be measured via performance-based measures or rating scales. Previous studies have shown these measurement methods to be weakly correlated. This study aimed to describe parent-rated EF and performance-based WM (PBWM) in pediatric brain tumor (BT) survivors, examine change in EF and PBWM across time, and investigate the relationship between parent-rated WM and PBWM.

METHOD

The sample included 56 patients diagnosed with a BT in childhood (M_age  = 6.94 years; SD = 4.05) seen twice for clinical neuropsychological evaluation. PBWM was examined via the auditory WM scale from a Wechsler intelligence measure or Differential Ability Scales-II. Parents completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)/BRIEF-P/BRIEF-2 as a measure of global EF (Global Executive Composite [GEC]), metacognitive skills (Metacognitive Index/Cognitive Regulation Index [MI/CRI]), behavioral regulation (Behavior Regulation Index [BRI]), and emotional regulation (Emotion Regulation Index [ERI]).

RESULTS

GEC, MI/CRI, and ERI at Time 1 were significantly above the mean (p < .01); BRI and PBWM did not differ from the normative mean. All measures were significantly higher than the normative mean at Time 2 (p < .05). PBWM was both clinically and statistically elevated (p < .001). There was a significant change across time in PBWM (p < .05), but not GEC, MI/CRI, ERI, or BRI. PBWM was weakly correlated with the BRIEF WM subscale at Time 1 and Time 2 (all p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple measures of EF should be considered when providing diagnoses and recommendations for pediatric BT survivors. Furthermore, given declines across time, findings document need for continued monitoring and reassessment of survivors as they get further out from treatment.

The Toll of Transition: Caregiver Perceptions of Family Adjustment During the Transition off Pediatric Cancer Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The role of transition-focused psychology appointments in managing the transition off therapy is unclear. The objective of this research was to explore caregiver perceived familial distress and the role of psychology in preparing families for transition.

METHODS

Fifty-seven caregivers of youth, who finished treatment, completed an online questionnaire through a quality improvement project on experiences of families at transition. Twenty-two percent of caregivers had children who completed a transition-focused psychology consult and 63% completed a cognitive assessment at transition. Retrospective analyses were conducted assessing the association of psychology visits on caregiver perceptions of being informed of and prepared to manage transition-related challenges.

RESULTS

Most caregivers reported experiencing adjustment concerns for family members. Caregivers of children completing a transition-focused psychology consult or cognitive assessment reported feeling more informed and greater preparedness to manage difficulties. Although decreased distress was not associated with the visit, those who felt more informed and prepared reported lower distress.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers perceive transitioning off therapy as stressful for their family, though they experience decreased familial distress when informed of and prepared to manage transition-related challenges. These findings highlight the importance of psychosocial support at transition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Educational Pain Points for Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors: Review of Risks and Remedies

Evolving treatment paradigms have led to increased survival rates for children diagnosed with a brain tumor, and this has increasingly shifted clinical and research focus to morbidity and quality of life among survivors. Among unfavorable outcomes, survivors of pediatric brain tumors are at risk for academic failure and low educational attainment, which may then contribute to lower health related quality of life, lower income and vocational status, and a greater likelihood of dependence on others in adulthood. Several specific risk factors for lower educational performance and attainment have been investigated. These are typically examined in isolation from one another which clouds understanding of the full range and potential interplay of contributors to educational difficulties. This review integrates and summarizes what is known about the direct and indirect barriers to educational success and performance (i.e., educational pain points) to enhance clinician knowledge of factors to consider when working with pediatric brain tumor survivors. Specific barriers to educational success include neurocognitive difficulties, school absences, psychosocial challenges, challenges to knowledge and communication, and physical and sensory difficulties. Finally, we discuss the current state of educational interventions and supports and offer recommendations for future research to improve educational outcomes for pediatric brain tumor survivors.

A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Family Perceptions of Neuropsychological Evaluation and Resources for Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors

OBJECTIVE

Neuropsychological testing is often recommended for pediatric brain tumor survivors, yet little is known about perceptions of testing and resources. The purpose of this study is to examine survivor and caregiver perceptions about neuropsychology and resources and identify factors associated with receipt of neuropsychological testing.

METHOD

Survivors and their families (N = 55) completed questionnaires on demographics and family functioning. The Neurological Predictive Scale was used to rate treatment intensity and expected impact on neuropsychological functioning. Chi squares and logistic regression were used to examine the associations between demographic, disease, and treatment factors and receipt of neuropsychological testing. Qualitative interviews (N = 25) were completed with a subset of families and coded with thematic content analysis and a multicoder consensus process with high inter-rater reliability (kappas .91-.93).

RESULTS

The majority of survivors received neuropsychological testing. Survivors were more likely to receive neuropsychological testing if they were younger and if their caregivers had less than a college education and lower income. Qualitatively, families identified neurocognitive concerns. Some families reported that neuropsychological testing was helpful in clarifying deficits or gaining accommodations, while other families had difficulty recalling results or identified barriers to services. To mitigate the impact of deficits, families implemented metacognitive strategies and advocated for their survivor at school. Families desired more resources around the transition to adulthood and more opportunities for connection with other survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Many families valued insights from neuropsychological services yet identified room for further improvement to address barriers and ensure accessibility and comprehensibility of neuropsychological findings.

Neuropsychological Screening in Pediatric Multidisciplinary Clinics: Group Characteristics and Predictive Utility

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of administering caregiver-report neuropsychological screening measures in pediatric multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) and investigate predictive utility for cognitive and academic difficulties on follow-up testing.

METHOD

The Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Functioning (Peds PCF) and Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire (CLDQ) were administered to caregivers of youth with history of brain tumor (BT), non-central nervous system (CNS) cancer, or Fontan circulation as part of routine neuropsychological consultation in MDCs from 2017 to 2019. We examined cross-sectional differences on screening measures, and relationships between screening and intellectual and academic test performance in a subset who presented for follow-up neuropsychological evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify suggested cut scores on screening measures for predicting who would most benefit from further evaluation.

RESULTS

Screening was completed with 192 families. Children with history of non-CNS cancer (n = 29) had fewer parent-reported cognitive and academic concerns compared with either BT (n = 88) or Fontan (n = 75) groups. Peds PCF and CLDQ scores were related to intellectual and academic test performance in the group presenting for neuropsychological evaluation (n = 68). ROC curve analysis identified cut scores across screening measures with maximal sensitivity and specificity for detecting neuropsychological difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to utilize parent rating measures during neuropsychological consultation in pediatric MDCs. The Peds PCF and CLDQ demonstrated sensitivity to intellectual and academic difficulties in children with significant medical histories. Screening may be a helpful tool for pediatric neuropsychologists and other professionals during MDC consultation to inform clinical management.

Long-term neuropsychological outcomes of survivors of young childhood brain tumors treated on the Head Start II protocol

Background

The Head Start treatment protocols have focused on curing young children with brain tumors while avoiding or delaying radiotherapy through using a combination of high-dose, marrow-ablative chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AuHCT). Late effects data from treatment on the Head Start II (HS II) protocol have previously been published for short-term follow-up (STF) at a mean of 39.7 months post-diagnosis. The current study examines long-term follow-up (LTF) outcomes from the same cohort.

Methods

Eighteen HS II patients diagnosed with malignant brain tumors <10 years of age at diagnosis completed a neurocognitive battery and parents completed psychological questionnaires at a mean of 104.7 months' post-diagnosis.

Results

There was no significant change in Full Scale IQ at LTF compared to baseline or STF. Similarly, most domains had no significant change from STF, including verbal IQ, performance IQ, academics, receptive language, learning/memory, visual-motor integration, and externalizing behaviors. Internalizing behaviors increased slightly at LTF. Clinically, most domains were within the average range, except for low average mathematics and receptive language. Additionally, performance did not significantly differ by age at diagnosis or time since diagnosis. Of note, children treated with high-dose methotrexate for disseminated disease or atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor displayed worse neurocognitive outcomes.

Conclusions

These results extend prior findings of relative stability in intellectual functioning for a LTF period. Ultimately, this study supports that treatment strategies for avoiding or delaying radiotherapy using high-dose, marrow-ablative chemotherapy and AuHCT may decrease the risk of neurocognitive and social-emotional declines in young pediatric brain tumor survivors.

Neuropsychological assessment of paediatric brain tumour survivors: Factors associated with assessment

AIM

Paediatric brain tumour survivors are at increased risk of neurocognitive deficits that affect their education. The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of brain tumour survivors who historically received a neuropsychological assessment and examine the demographic and treatment-related variables associated with neuropsychological assessment. A further aim was to determine the number and treatment profile of brain tumour survivors who would benefit from neuropsychological assessment.

METHODS

Data from the New Zealand Children's Cancer Registry including treatments received, was used to identify children treated for a brain tumour at Starship Children's Hospital between January 2009 and December 2015. Clinical records were examined for evidence of a neuropsychological assessment in the form of a written report. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with receipt of an assessment.

RESULTS

Of the 132 brain tumour survivors, 37 (28.0%) had evidence of a neuropsychological assessment in their clinical records. In adjusted analysis, children who were treated with all three of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n = 38) were more likely to have had an assessment (odds ratio: 12.90; 95% confidence interval: 4.76-34.93) than children who had either no treatment, chemotherapy alone, surgery alone or chemotherapy and surgery (n = 73). Treatment with radiotherapy alone or with either chemotherapy or surgery (n = 21) was not significantly associated with receipt of assessment (odds ratio = 2.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-8.37).

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to identify the number of children who might benefit from neuropsychological assessment to inform prioritisation within existing resource and plan for additional resource if required. With a focus on reducing late effects, it is imperative that neuropsychological assessment is an integral component of a paediatric brain tumour programme.

Impact of central nervous system-directed treatment on competence and adjustment among children in early cancer survivorship

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS)-directed treatments can cause long-term academic, social, and emotional difficulties for children with cancer. However, limited research has examined the emergence of problems longitudinally and has often stratified risk by diagnosis alone. Therefore, this study compared competence and adjustment in children, who did and did not receive CNS-directed treatment, over the first 3 years following a cancer diagnosis.

PROCEDURE

Mothers, fathers, and children (ages 5-18 years at diagnosis) from 217 families reported on the child's competence (academic, social) and adjustment (anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed) near a new cancer diagnosis or relapse and 3 years later. Children were categorized into CNS-directed treatment (n = 112; including cranial radiation, intrathecal chemotherapy, and/or neurosurgery) and non-CNS-directed treatment (n = 105) groups.

RESULTS

At enrollment, there were few differences in competence and emotional adjustment among children based on treatment or diagnostic group. At 3 years, mothers and fathers reported poorer social competence for the CNS-directed treatment group, and fathers reported poorer school competence for the CNS-directed treatment group. Over time, father ratings of social competence increased for the non-CNS-directed treatment group, but not the CNS-directed treatment group. While father ratings of academic competence declined for the CNS-directed treatment group, mother ratings declined the most for children diagnosed with a brain tumor. All children demonstrated higher anxious/depressed scores over time.

CONCLUSIONS

CNS-directed treatment may be a valuable indicator to identify childhood cancer survivors at risk for poor competence during early survivorship. Follow-up screening and supportive services are recommended, as well as additional longitudinal research.

Association of language proficiency, sociodemographics, and neurocognitive functioning in dual-language Latino survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma (ALL/LL) are at risk for cognitive dysfunction, but little is known about its relationship with language proficiency and sociodemographics.

PROCEDURE

In this cross-sectional cohort study of Latino survivors of childhood ALL/LL, English and Spanish language proficiency and cognitive and academic functioning were measured and their associations determined using paired t-tests, Pearson correlations, and linear regressions.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 57; 50.9% female) had mean ages (years ± SD) of 4.3 ± 2.6 at diagnosis and 10.6 ± 2.9 at testing (range 6-16); mean time post treatment was 3.7 ± 2.6 years. The majority (73.7%) had low socioeconomic status (SES). Most (78.8%) were dual-language learners in English and Spanish. English proficiency was graded as limited-to-fluent and was significantly higher than Spanish (p < .001). Higher SES was correlated with higher English proficiency (r = 0.31, p = .020). Males had higher Spanish proficiency (r = -0.32, p = .034). Controlling for SES and sex, English proficiency accounted for 43% of cognitive functioning variance (F = 14.86, p < .001), 55% of reading comprehension variance (F = 22.14, p < .001), and 21% of mathematics variance (F = 5.76, p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Low language proficiency correlated with SES but was independently associated with lower cognitive and academic functioning. Research and surveillance for neurocognitive late effects in Latino ALL/LL survivors should incorporate measures of language proficiency and SES to account for their effects on cognitive and academic functioning.

Neuropsychological assessment in pediatric oncology survivorship care: utilization of services, results of evaluation, and educational and behavioral health outcomes

PURPOSE

Neuropsychological evaluation has become a standard component of long-term follow-up care for survivors of pediatric cancer. The purpose of the present study was to examine access to, and benefits of, neuropsychological evaluation for survivors.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on cancer survivors who were referred for neuropsychological evaluation from a multidisciplinary long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinic approximately 5 years following treatment cessation. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and t-tests and chi-square analyses were utilized to examine variables that may impact survivors' access to neuropsychological services.

RESULTS

One hundred seven survivors between 6 and 26 years old were referred for a neuropsychological evaluation. Referred male patients were less likely than female patients to schedule an evaluation. Consultation with a neuropsychologist in the LTFU clinic was related to more referrals but did not improve attrition rates (55%). Twenty-four percent of evaluated patients displayed severe cognitive impairment and 75% were diagnosed with a psychological disorder. Utilization of educational and behavioral health services did not significantly change following evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Survivors' utilization of neuropsychological services is lower for males than females. The presence of a neuropsychologist in a multidisciplinary team clinic can improve identification of survivors that may benefit from neuropsychological evaluation. Many survivors did not receive recommended services, suggesting patients and families may need additional supports following evaluation. Future research should focus on improving survivors' access to neuropsychological services and identifying barriers to receiving recommended services.

Growing up after childhood cancer: maturity and life satisfaction in young adulthood

Purpose

Young individuals face a variety of developmental tasks as they mature into adulthood. For survivors of childhood cancer, growing up may be more difficult due to their illness and late effects from treatment. This study is the first to quantitatively examine perceptions of maturity and how these perceptions contribute to satisfaction with life among young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Methods

Ninety survivors of childhood cancer (M_age = 29.8; 7–37 years post-diagnosis) were recruited to complete online surveys on how mature they felt relative to peers, their perceived maturity on three domains (financial, personal, social), and life satisfaction.

Results

Most survivors (62%; n = 56) felt they grew up faster than their peers, and over half (56%; n = 50) felt more mature. Perceived maturity was high on all three domains, but brain tumor survivors reported significantly lower maturity than other survivors (d = 0.76–1.11). All maturity domains were positively associated with life satisfaction (r = .49–.56). Hierarchical linear regressions indicated that 44% of the variance in life satisfaction was explained by perceptions of growing up slower (β =  − 1.08, p = .004) and marginally by greater perceived personal maturity (β = 0.45, p = .061).

Conclusions

Childhood cancer can influence development, with most survivors feeling that they grew up faster and were more mature than peers. Personal maturity was related to life satisfaction, with survivors of brain tumors or those who felt they grew up slower at greatest risk for lower life satisfaction. Future research and clinical practice should consider survivors’ development and maturation across the life span to promote overall well-being.

Intellectual changes after radiation for children with brain tumors: which brain structures are most important?

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of radiation dose to different intracranial structures on changes in intellectual function for children with brain tumors.

METHODS

We evaluated children with brain tumors treated in 2005-2017 who had longitudinal neuropsychological assessments and available photon dosimetric data (if radiation therapy [RT] given). Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and index scores were evaluated (perceptual reasoning index [PRI], processing speed index [PSI], verbal comprehension index [VCI], and working memory index [WMI]). Multivariable linear mixed effects models were used to model endpoints, with age at RT and dose to different brain regions as fixed effects and patient-specific random intercepts. P-values (P*) were adjusted for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included, 56 of whom received RT. Median neuropsychological follow-up was 3.2 years. Right temporal lobe mean dose was strongly associated with decline in FSIQ (P* = 0.005); with each gray increase in mean dose, there was a decrease of 0.052 FSIQ points per year. Dose to 50% (D50) of the supratentorial brain was associated with decline in PSI (P* = 0.006) and WMI (P* = 0.001). Right and left hippocampus D50 were individually strongly associated with declines in VCI (P* = 0.009 for each). Presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt decreased FSIQ by 10 points.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported associations between dosimetry to specific brain regions and intellectual outcomes, with suggested avoidance structures during RT planning. These models can help clinicians anticipate changes in neurocognition post-RT and guide selection of an optimal RT plan.

Longitudinal Trajectories of Neurocognitive Functioning in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

OBJECTIVE

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk for neurocognitive deficits, and examining individual variability is essential to understand these risks. This study evaluated latent longitudinal trajectories and risk factors of neurocognitive outcomes in childhood ALL.

METHODS

There were 233 participants with ALL who were enrolled on a phase 3, risk-stratified chemotherapy-only clinical trial (NCT00137111) and who completed protocol-directed neurocognitive assessments [47.6% female, mean (SD) = 6.6 (3.7) years]. Measures of sustained attention, learning/memory, and parent ratings of attention were completed during and after treatment. Longitudinal latent class analyses were used to classify participants into distinct trajectories. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of class membership.

RESULTS

Within the overall group, attention performance was below age expectations across time (Conners Continuous Performance Test detectability/variability, p < 0.01); memory performance and parent ratings were below expectations at later phases (California Verbal Learning Test learning slope, p < 0.05; Conners Parent Rating Scale, Revised attention/learning, p < 0.05). Most participants (80-89%) had stable neurocognitive profiles; smaller groups showed declining (3-6%) or improving (3-11%) trajectories. Older age (p = 0.020), female sex (p = 0.018), and experiencing sepsis (p = 0.047) were associated with greater attention problems over time. Lower baseline IQ was associated with improved memory (p = 0.035) and fewer ratings of attention problems (p = 0.013) over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with ALL have stable neurocognitive profiles. Smaller groups have significant impairments shortly after diagnosis or have worsening performance over time. A tiered assessment approach, which includes consideration of individual and clinical risk factors, may be useful for monitoring neurocognitive functioning during treatment and survivorship.

School and educational support programmes for paediatric oncology patients and survivors: A systematic review of evidence and recommendations for future research and practice

OBJECTIVES

The Psychosocial Standards of Care (PSSC) in paediatric oncology prescribe the minimum standards for education support. It is unknown, however, if published education support programmes for children with cancer meet the PSSC standards for education support. Successful implementation of standards for education support is challenging but may be achieved with guidance. We aimed to (1) review education support programmes for childhood cancer patients and survivors against the PSSC standards and (2) provide practical recommendations for future research and implementation of education support programmes.

METHODS

We searched PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Educational Resources Information and Center databases. We reviewed the education support programmes using five evaluation criteria derived from the PSSC and summarised the structure of identified programmes. We examined the features and limitations of programmes that met all evaluation criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 20 education support programmes in paediatric oncology, including peer programmes (n = 3), teacher programmes (n = 5), and school re-entry programmes (SRPs n = 12). We found that three SRPs met all evaluation criteria and that SRP components were timed according to the child's position on the cancer trajectory (e.g., diagnosis and treatment, school re-entry, and follow up throughout schooling). The supporting evidence of the programmes, however, is unclear due to the lack of adequately designed studies.

CONCLUSIONS

SRPs provide a promising structure for future education support programmes. We recommend strategies for developing and evaluating education support that adheres to the PSSC and adapts to international and local contexts.

Neurocognitive functioning in long-term survivors of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation

Survivors of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at risk for impairment in cognitive and academic function. Most research to date has focused on the first years following transplant, and less is known about the long-term effects. We examined global and specific neurocognitive functioning in long-term (>5 years post HCT) survivors in comparison to both normative data and a sample of demographically similar healthy peers. A comprehensive battery of neurocognitive measures was obtained from 83 long-term survivors and 50 healthy comparisons. Analyses were conducted to assess for differences in neurocognitive functions between survivors, normative means, and healthy comparisons, and to examine the impact of medical and demographic variables on neurocognitive performance. Survivors' performance was within the Average range across most measures, although significantly lower than both test norms and healthy comparisons on several measures. Despite generally intact neurocognitive functioning in the survivor group as a whole, survivors who experienced graft-vs.-host disease demonstrated slower processing speed and weaker verbal learning. Use of total body irradiation was not associated with any performance-based measure of neurocognitive functioning. Although subgroups of patients may be at relatively higher risk of neurocognitive impairment, the long-term neurocognitive impact for most survivors is relatively small.

Psychological, educational, and social late effects in adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the impact of treatment exposures and chronic health conditions on psychological, educational, and social outcomes in adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor.

METHODS

Parent reports from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were analyzed for 666 adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor and 698 adolescent siblings. Adjusting for race and household income, survivors were compared to siblings on the Behavior Problems Index and educational outcomes. Multivariable modified Poisson regression estimated relative risks (RR) for therapeutic exposures and chronic health conditions (CTCAE 4.03 graded) among survivors, adjusting for sex, race, income, and age at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Compared to siblings, adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor were more likely to take psychoactive medication (9.4% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001) and utilize special education services (25.5% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001) but did not differ significantly in emotional and behavioral problems. Survivors were less likely to be friendless (7.2% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.04) but were more likely to have difficulty getting along with friends (14.5% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001). Among survivors, use of special education services was associated with abdomen plus chest radiation (RR = 1.98, CI:1.18-3.34). Those with grade 2-4 cardiovascular conditions had higher risk for anxiety/depression (RR = 1.95, CI:1.19-3.19), headstrong behaviors (RR = 1.91, CI:1.26-2.89), and inattention (RR = 1.56, CI:1.02-2.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor were similar to siblings with respect to mental health concerns overall but were more likely to require special education. Monitoring of psychosocial and academic problems through adolescence is warranted, especially among those treated with radiation to the abdomen plus chest or with cardiac conditions.

Young Adult Cancer Survivorship: Recommendations for Patient Follow-up, Exercise Therapy, and Research

Survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers (AYAs) often live 50 to 60 years beyond their diagnosis. This rapidly growing cohort is at increased risk for cancer- and treatment-related 'late effects' that persist for decades into survivorship. Recognition of similar issues in pediatric cancer survivors has prompted the development of evidence-based guidelines for late effects screening and care. However, corresponding evidence-based guidelines for AYAs have not been developed. We hosted an AYA survivorship symposium for a large group of multidisciplinary AYA stakeholders (approximately 200 were in attendance) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) to begin addressing this disparity. The following overview briefly summarizes and discusses the symposium's stakeholder-identified high-priority targets for late effects screening and care and highlights knowledge gaps to direct future research in the field of AYA survivorship. This overview, although not exhaustive, is intended to stimulate clinicians to consider these high-priority screening and care targets when seeing survivors in clinical settings and, ultimately, to support the development of evidence-based late effects screening and care guidelines for AYAs.

The reliability of the health related quality of life questionnaire PedsQL 3.0 cancer module in a sample of Swedish children

Background

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a modular instrument, designed to integrate generic and disease specific measures, and includes both self- and proxy-reports. The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and limited validity of the Swedish version of the disease specific Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0 Cancer Module Scales (PedsQL 3.0), in a sample of Swedish children diagnosed with cancer.

Method

A total of 94 families at The Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Sahlgrenska University participated in the study. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL 4.0) and the PedsQL 3.0 were administered to 63 children (aged 5–18 years) with cancer and to 94 parents of children with cancer aged 2–18 years.

Results

The internal consistency of the PedsQL 3.0, reached or exceeded Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.70 for both -self- and proxy-reports. The PedsQL 4.0 and PedsQL 3.0 were highly correlated (r = 0.94 for proxy-reports and r = 0.91 for self-reports), indicating convergent validity.

Conclusion

PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Scales can be used as a valuable tool for measuring cancer-specific HRQOL in child populations, both in research and in clinical practice.

Social-ecological predictors of school functioning in Hispanic children treated for cancer with central nervous system-directed therapies

BACKGROUND

Children with brain tumor or acute leukemia are at risk for neurotoxic side effects associated with their cancer therapies. These long-term deficits include poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in school and lower educational achievement. Although social-ecological factors may impact these outcomes, it is not known which factors play a role. Our objective was to evaluate the factors affecting school HRQOL in Hispanic childhood cancer survivors, an important at-risk group.

PROCEDURE

Multivariable regression analyses examined whether selected social-ecological factors contribute toward suboptimal school HRQOL in 73 Hispanic children treated with central nervous system (CNS)-directed cancer therapies after accounting for effects associated with established cancer-related risk factors.

RESULTS

Consistent with expectations from prior research, in our multivariate analysis, the cancer-related factors of having a brain tumor diagnosis and being younger at cancer diagnosis were significant predictors of reduced parent-reported school HRQOL (F(2,65) = 5.46, P < .01) and accounted for 14% of the variance. Adding the social-ecological variables of parent education, child motivation, and parental knowledge accounted for an additional 25% of the variance in school HRQOL, where higher levels were associated with better child school HRQOL. Parenting knowledge was a contributor even after controlling for effects associated with the other variables in the model (F(1,62) = 4.88, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivorship care should incorporate parent education interventions to enhance the child's school functioning, particularly for Hispanic childhood cancer survivors from predominantly Spanish-speaking families. Future research should consider other at-risk groups and incorporate social-ecological indicators to predict HRQOL outcomes.

Assessment of Online Resources for Returning to School During and After Treatment of Childhood Cancer

To evaluate current online parent education resources for children returning to school after a cancer diagnosis. Online search was conducted using 3 search engines and terms recommended by affected families. Sites were evaluated by 3 reviewers for understandability and actionability (scored 0-100%) using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Readability was assessed using Flesch-Kincaid (grade K-12) and content comprehensiveness by a clinical expert review for 5 late effect domains (scored 0-100%). A total of 56 unique online resources were evaluated. Mean understandability and actionability scores were 54% (range 17-83) and 36% (range 0-83) respectively. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 10th grade (mode 12th). Comprehensiveness of domain coverage was 34% (mode 20%). Some high-quality materials for this topic are available, but generally low scores on the PEMAT scales and high reading level estimates on Flesch-Kincaid indicate parents may have difficulty understanding and using the information. The low scores for comprehensiveness of information indicate parents will likely need to access multiple sources for complete information. A table provides the names, website (URL), and scoring for the 24 top-rated sites and can be used to make recommendations to parents with improved confidence in quality.

Assessment of Executive Functions after Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoid Leukemia: a Systematic Review

Individuals treated for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a high survival rate. This fact, however, may lead to neurocognitive impairments in survivors, as shown in some studies. The prefrontal cortex and executive functions seem to be particularly vulnerable due to the late maturation in the development process. Executive impairments have been associated with poorer quality of life in childhood cancer survivors. A systematic review was carried out with studies that assessed executive functions in childhood ALL survivors.\ Studies were collected from five electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed); PsycInfo; WebOfScience; LILACS and IBECS. Eighty-four studies were retrieved from the database search, of which 50 were read in full and 26 met the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogeneous as to the instruments used to assess executive function, the skills assessed and the comparison methods. Despite some discrepancies, ALL survivors seem to exhibit poorer executive functioning than typical controls, but this result did not hold true when subjects were compared to normative mean. Changes in brain structure and dynamics resulting from the disease itself, the toxicity of the treatment and difficulties in coping with the stress during treatment may be related to executive impairments in ALL survivors. Discussion proposed standardized methods and measures for assessing executive functioning in children during and after ALL treatment.

Symptom burden trajectories experienced by patients with brain tumors

BACKGROUND

Survivors of childhood brain tumors experience persistent health concerns across their lifespan. In the current study, the authors evaluated changes in symptom burden over the course of 12 months using pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures.

METHODS

Data from 202 survivors aged 8 to 21 years and 262 parents of survivors who were aged 5 to 21 years were analyzed. All completed a PROMIS Cognition short form and computerized adaptive tests of pediatric Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, Fatigue, Mobility, Upper Extremity Function, and Peer Relationships. Approximately one-half of participants (223 participants: 97 survivors of childhood brain tumors and 126 parents) completed the 12-month follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated group-level symptoms over time. Cox proportional hazard models explored whether symptoms predicted survival, and latent class growth analysis investigated patterns of individual-level symptom changes over time.

RESULTS

Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated that patient-reported Cognition and parent-reported Anxiety worsened over time. Latent class growth analysis results indicated that patient and parent reports diverged, both with regard to the number of classes identified and in the trends of these classes. Parents and patients reported similar patterns of depression over time. For the other areas, parents either were more likely to observe different patterns (Peer Relationships and Mobility) or less likely to observe different patterns (Upper Extremity Function, Cognition, Anxiety, and Fatigue). Baseline patient-reported Mobility and Upper Extremity Function were found to be associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors of childhood brain tumors demonstrated different trajectory patterns of symptom burden. Along with baseline functioning status and days since treatment, patient-reported Mobility and Upper Extremity Function were associated with survival, suggesting a possible role for patient-reported outcomes in clinical care, especially individualized, tailored assessments such as PROMIS.

Beyond Risk-Based Stratification: Impacts of Processing Speed and Executive Function on Adaptive Skills in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

Purpose: The number of adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer is increasing, and the impacts of therapy on their daily lives are not well understood. Adaptive functions are required for age-appropriate interactions and day to day functioning, but are reduced in AYA survivors. Work in other pediatric populations suggests that additional neurocognitive skills may influence adaptive function and, thus, quality of life and personal attainment of AYA cancer survivors. Methods: Retrospective medical records review examined neurocognitive data from 139 AYA survivors. Hierarchical linear regression examined age at diagnosis, use of central nervous system (CNS) radiation, verbal intelligence, processing speed, and executive function as predictors of adaptive functioning domains. Results: AYA survivors exhibited weaknesses in all domains of adaptive functioning compared to normative reference values (Cohen's d = 0.660-0.864), as well as in processing speed (Cohen's d = 0.791) and metacognitive executive functioning (Cohen's d = 0.817). Processing speed and executive function provided substantial improvements in prediction of adaptive functioning beyond that of age at diagnosis and use of CNS-directed radiation therapy. Taken together these variables explained 37.1% of variability in adaptive conceptual skills, 26.1% in adaptive social skills, and 27.1% of adaptive practical skills. Conclusions: Intelligence, processing speed, and executive function significantly contribute to adaptive function scores in AYA cancer survivors and impact domains that are important to self-sufficiency and quality of life. Attention to neurocognitive function in all AYA cancer survivors is recommended in addition to referral for neuropsychological evaluation and tailoring interventions to address executive and adaptive functioning.

Neuropsychological outcomes on Head Start III: a prospective, multi-institutional clinical trial for young children diagnosed with malignant brain tumors

BACKGROUND

Current pediatric brain tumor treatment focuses on titrating toxicity based on risk factors while simultaneously improving survivorship. The Head Start (HS) protocols I to IV (1991-present) use high-dose chemotherapy (HDCTx) with an aim of reducing or eliminating cranial irradiation in very young children, the most vulnerable to its effects.

METHODS

We examined estimated Full Scale IQ, overall Adaptive Functioning, Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Verbal and Nonverbal Memory outcome data for 43 HS III patients diagnosed between ages 2 months and 7 years from 15 institutions in the United States and Canada.

RESULTS

At a mean of 5.12 years postdiagnosis, the HS III patients performed within the average to low-average ranges across these variables; however, individual variability was noted with scores ranging from superior to impaired, and the sample as a whole performed lower than age expectations. Performance did not significantly differ by sex or ethnicity, diagnosis, or for those treated with an intravenous methotrexate dose of 400 mg/kg vs 270 mg/kg. Additionally, performance did not significantly differ by age at diagnosis or length of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results, indicating overall average to low-average neurocognitive functioning, are encouraging, though significant individual variability was noted. Those who were younger at diagnosis, received more intensive methotrexate, and were further out from treatment were not at significantly increased risk of cognitive decline within our sample, suggesting a strategy of using HDCTx and autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell rescue to reduce or eliminate irradiation may allow for continued CNS development in young children treated for a brain tumor.

Psychosocial care for children receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, this new paradigm has introduced unique considerations specific to the patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy, including prognostic uncertainty, symptom management, and psychosocial support. With increasing availability, there is a growing need for evidence-based recommendations that address the specific psychosocial needs of the children who receive CAR T-cell therapy and their families. To guide and standardize the psychosocial care offered for patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy, we propose the following recommendations for addressing psychosocial support.