The extraordinary challenge of treating patients with congenital rhabdoid tumors-a collaborative European effort

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome: A historical review of treatments and outcomes for associated pediatric malignancies

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS) is a rare disorder associated with malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (RTK), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), and/or other extracranial, extrarenal rhabdoid tumors (EERT), and these pediatric malignancies are difficult to treat. Presently, most of the information regarding clinical manifestations, treatment, and outcomes of rhabdoid tumors comes from large data registries and case series. Our current understanding of treatments for patients with rhabdoid tumors may inform how we approach patients with RTPS. In this manuscript, we review the genetic and clinical features of RTPS and, using known registry data and clinical reports, review associated tumor types ATRT, RTK, and EERT, closing with potential new approaches to treatment. We propose collaborative international efforts to study the use of SMARC (SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin)-targeting agents, high-dose consolidative therapy, and age-based irradiation of disease sites in RTPS.

Rhabdoid tumors in patients conceived following ART: is there an association?

STUDY QUESTION

In children affected by rhabdoid tumors (RT), are there clinical, therapeutic, and/or (epi-)genetic differences between those conceived following ART compared to those conceived without ART?

SUMMARY ANSWER

We detected a significantly elevated female predominance, and a lower median age at diagnosis, of children with RT conceived following ART (RT_ART) as compared to other children with RT.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Anecdotal evidence suggests an association of ART with RT.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a multi-institutional retrospective survey. Children with RT conceived by ART were identified in our EU-RHAB database (n = 11/311 children diagnosed between January 2010 and January 2018) and outside the EU-RHAB database (n = 3) from nine different countries. A population-representative German EU-RHAB control cohort of children with RTs conceived without ART (n = 211) (EU-RHAB control cohort) during the same time period was used as a control cohort for clinical, therapeutic, and survival analyses. The median follow-up time was 11.5 months (range 0-120 months) for children with RT_ART and 18.5 months (range 0-153 months) for the EU-RHAB control cohort.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We analyzed 14 children with RT_ART diagnosed from January 2010 to January 2018. We examined tumors and matching blood samples for SMARCB1 mutations and copy number alterations using FISH, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and DNA sequencing. DNA methylation profiling of tumor and/or blood samples was performed using DNA methylation arrays and compared to respective control cohorts of similar age (n = 53 tumors of children with RT conceived without ART, and n = 38 blood samples of children with no tumor born small for gestational age).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The median age at diagnosis of 14 individuals with RT_ART was 9 months (range 0-66 months), significantly lower than the median age of patients with RT (n = 211) in the EU-RHAB control cohort (16 months (range 0-253), P = 0.03). A significant female predominance was observed in the RT_ART cohort (M:F ratio: 2:12 versus 116:95 in EU-RHAB control cohort, P = 0.004). Eight of 14 RT_ART patients were diagnosed with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, three with extracranial, extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor, one with rhabdoid tumor of the kidney and two with synchronous tumors. The location of primary tumors did not differ significantly in the EU-RHAB control cohort (P = 0.27). Six of 14 RT_ART patients presented with metastases at diagnosis. Metastatic stage was not significantly different from that within the EU-RHAB control cohort (6/14 vs 88/211, P = 1). The incidence of pathogenic germline variants was five of the 12 tested RT_ART patients and, thus, not significantly different from the EU-RHAB control cohort (5/12 versus 36/183 tested, P = 0.35). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) rates of RT_ART patients were 42.9 ± 13.2% and 21.4 ± 11%, respectively, and thus comparable to the EU-RHAB control cohort (OS 41.1 ± 3.5% and EFS 32.1 ± 3.3). We did not find other clinical, therapeutic, outcome factors distinguishing patients with RT_ART from children with RTs conceived without ART (EU-RHAB control cohort). DNA methylation analyses of 10 tumors (atypical teratoid RT = 6, extracranial, extrarenal malignant RT = 4) and six blood samples from RT_ART patients showed neither evidence of a general DNA methylation difference nor underlying imprinting defects, respectively, when compared to a control group (n = 53 RT samples of patients without ART, P = 0.51, n = 38 blood samples of patients born small for gestational age, P = 0.1205).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

RTs are very rare malignancies and our results are based on a small number of children with RT_ART.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This cohort of patients with RT_ART demonstrated a marked female predominance, and a rather low median age at diagnosis even for RTs. Other clinical, treatment, outcome, and molecular factors did not differ from those conceived without ART (EU-RHAB control cohort) or reported in other series, and there was no evidence for imprinting defects. Long-term survival is achievable even in cases with pathogenic germline variants, metastatic disease at diagnosis, or relapse. The female preponderance among RT_ART patients is not yet understood and needs to be evaluated, ideally in larger international series.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

M.C.F. is supported by the 'Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung' DKS 2020.10, by the 'Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft' DFG FR 1516/4-1 and by the Deutsche Krebshilfe 70113981. R.S. received grant support by Deutsche Krebshilfe 70114040 and for infrastructure by the KinderKrebsInitiative Buchholz/Holm-Seppensen. P.D.J. is supported by the Else-Kroener-Fresenius Stiftung and receives a Max-Eder scholarship from the Deutsche Krebshilfe. M.H. is supported by DFG (HA 3060/8-1) and IZKF Münster (Ha3/017/20). BB is supported by the 'Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung' DKS 2020.05. We declare no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Infants and Newborns with Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors (ATRT) and Extracranial Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors (eMRT) in the EU-RHAB Registry: A Unique and Challenging Population

Simple Summary

Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) are deadly tumors that predominantly affect infants and young children. Even when considering the generally young age of these patients, the treatment of infants below the age of six months represents a particular challenge due to the vulnerability of this patient population. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the available information on prognostic factors, genetics, toxicity of treatment and long-term outcomes of MRT. We confirmed that, in a cohort of homogenously treated infants with MRT, significant predictors of outcome were female sex, localized stage, absence of a GLM and maintenance therapy, and these significantly favorably influence prognosis. Stratification-based biomarker-driven tailored trials may be a key option to improve survival rates.

Abstract

Introduction: Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) predominantly affect infants and young children. Patients below six months of age represent a particularly therapeutically challenging group. Toxicity to developing organ sites limits intensity of treatment. Information on prognostic factors, genetics, toxicity of treatment and long-term outcomes is sparse. Methods: Clinical, genetic, and treatment data of 100 patients (aged below 6 months at diagnosis) from 13 European countries were analyzed (2005–2020). Tumors and matching blood samples were examined for SMARCB1 mutations using FISH, MLPA and Sanger sequencing. DNA methylation subgroups (ATRT-TYR, ATRT-SHH, and ATRT-MYC) were determined using 450 k / 850 k-profiling. Results: A total of 45 patients presented with ATRT, 29 with extracranial, extrarenal (eMRT) and 9 with renal rhabdoid tumors (RTK). Seventeen patients demonstrated synchronous tumors (SYN). Metastases (M+) were present in 27% (26/97) at diagnosis. A germline mutation (GLM) was detected in 55% (47/86). DNA methylation subgrouping was available in 50% (31 / 62) with ATRT or SYN; for eMRT, methylation-based subgrouping was not performed. The 5-year overall (OS) and event free survival (EFS) rates were 23.5 ± 4.6% and 19 ± 4.1%, respectively. Male sex (11 ± 5% vs. 35.8 ± 7.4%), M+ stage (6.1 ± 5.4% vs. 36.2 ± 7.4%), presence of SYN (7.1 ± 6.9% vs. 26.6 ± 5.3%) and GLM (7.7 ± 4.2% vs. 45.7 ± 8.6%) were significant prognostic factors for 5-year OS. Molecular subgrouping and survival analyses confirm a previously described survival advantage for ATRT-TYR. In an adjusted multivariate model, clinical factors that favorably influence the prognosis were female sex, localized stage, absence of a GLM and maintenance therapy. Conclusions: In this cohort of homogenously treated infants with MRT, significant predictors of outcome were sex, M-stage, GLM and maintenance therapy. We confirm the need to stratify which patient groups benefit from multimodal treatment, and which need novel therapeutic strategies. Biomarker-driven tailored trials may be a key option.

An analysis of the diagnosis, clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival outcomes of 36 extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumor patients

BACKGROUND

Extracranial malignant Rhabdoid tumors (eMRTs) are rare but aggressive lesions in young children. This work aimed to review and analyze the diagnosis, clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival of eMRTs so as to summarize experience for future therapy.

METHODS

A total of 36 eMRT cases were treated between January 2008 and August 2019 according to Shanghai Children's Medical Center (SCMC) multimodal protocol of mixed surgery, radiation and chemotherapy involving vincristine, carboplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide. We collected information including: age at diagnosis, tumor location, disease stage, therapy, outcomes, etc. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were calculated and risk factors for survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients had a median age of 1.80 years at diagnosis (range, 1.4 m-13.42 years), and were followed up for 9.17 months in median (range, 4 d-11.14 y). A total of 16 patients achieved complete remission (CR), and 7 survived without reoccurrence till December 2019. The 3-year EFS was 17.4% (95% CI: 11.0-23.8%) with a 3-year OS of 23.4% (95% CI: 15.8-31.0%). Recurrence was found only in children younger than the median age (1.80 y). Localized staging (Log Rank P=0.039 for OS and P=0.021) and older age (Log Rank P=0.016 for OS and P=0.002 for EFS) were associated with improved outcome. Younger age (Cox regression, OS, OR =2.610, 95% CI: 1.147-5.937, P=0.022; EFS, OR =3.401, 95% CI: 1.495-7.752, P=0.004) were independent risk factors for death and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Those eMRTs treated according to SCMC protocol turned out to have poor outcomes. Higher staging at diagnosis and reoccurrence in younger patients remain major threats to the prognosis.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Sarcomas

Neonatal sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare soft tissue neoplasms that present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Recent advances in molecular profiling have improved diagnostic capabilities and reveal novel therapeutic targets. Clinical trials demonstrate differences in behavior between sarcoma subtypes that allow for better clinical management. Surgical resection has been replaced with a multimodal approach that includes chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Despite these advances, neonates with sarcoma continue to fare worse than histologically similar sarcomas in older children, likely reflecting differences in tumor biology and the complexities of neonatal medicine. This review focuses on recent advances in managing neonatal sarcomas.

Current recommendations for clinical surveillance and genetic testing in rhabdoid tumor predisposition: a report from the SIOPE Host Genome Working Group

The rhabdoid tumor (RT) predisposition syndromes 1 and 2 (RTPS1 and 2) are rare genetic conditions rendering young children vulnerable to an increased risk of RT, malignant neoplasms affecting the kidney, miscellaneous soft-part tissues, the liver and the central nervous system (Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors, ATRT). Both, RTPS1&2 are due to pathogenic variants (PV) in genes encoding constituents of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex, i.e. SMARCB1 (RTPS1) and SMARCA4 (RTPS2). In contrast to other genetic disorders related to PVs in SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 such as Coffin-Siris Syndrome, RTPS1&2 are characterized by a predominance of truncating PVs, terminating transcription thus explaining a specific cancer risk. The penetrance of RTPS1 early in life is high and associated with a poor survival. However, few unaffected carriers may be encountered. Beyond RT, the tumor spectrum may be larger than initially suspected, and cancer surveillance offered to unaffected carriers (siblings or parents) and long-term survivors of RT is still a matter of discussion. RTPS2 exposes female carriers to an ill-defined risk of small cell carcinoma of the ovaries, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), which may appear in prepubertal females. RT surveillance protocols for these rare families have not been established. To address unresolved issues in the care of individuals with RTPS and to propose appropriate surveillance guidelines in childhood, the SIOPe Host Genome working group invited pediatric oncologists and geneticists to contribute to an expert meeting. The current manuscript summarizes conclusions of the panel discussion, including consented statements as well as non-evidence-based proposals for validation in the future.

Clinical and genetic risk factors define two risk groups of extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumours (eMRT/RTK)

INTRODUCTION

Extracranial rhabdoid tumours are rare, highly aggressive malignancies primarily affecting young children. The EU-RHAB registry was initiated in 2009 to prospectively collect data of rhabdoid tumour patients treated according to the EU-RHAB therapeutic framework.

METHODS

We evaluated 100 patients recruited within EU-RHAB (2009-2018). Tumours and matching blood samples were examined for SMARCB1 mutations by sequencing and cytogenetics.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients presented with extracranial, extrarenal tumours (eMRT) and 30 with renal rhabdoid tumours (RTK). Nine patients demonstrated synchronous tumours. Distant metastases at diagnosis (M+) were present in 35% (35/100), localised disease (M0) with (LN+) and without (LN-) loco-regional lymph node involvement in 65% (65/100). SMARCB1 germline mutations (GLM) were detected in 21% (17/81 evaluable) of patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 45.8 ± 5.4% and 35.2 ± 5.1%, respectively. On univariate analyses, age at diagnosis (≥12 months), M0-stage, absence of synchronous tumours, absence of a GLM, gross total resection (GTR), radiotherapy and achieving a CR were significantly associated with favourable outcomes. In an adjusted multivariate model presence of a GLM, M+ and lack of a GTR were the strongest significant negative predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest to stratify patients with localised disease (M0), GTR+ and without proof of a GLM (5-year OS 72.2 ± 9.9%) as 'standard risk'. Patients presenting with one of the features M+ and/or GTR- and/or GLM+ belong to a high risk group (5-year, OS 32.5 ± 6.2%). These patients need novel therapeutic strategies such as combinations of targeted agents with conventional chemotherapy or novel experimental approaches ideally within international phase I/II trials.

Meta-Analysis of Treatment Modalities in Metastatic Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors in Children

BACKGROUND

Metastatic atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs) are aggressive central nervous system tumors that present during infancy and are associated with dismal outcomes. Patients receive multimodal treatment including surgical resection, systemic chemotherapy, and one or more of intrathecal chemotherapy (IT), marrow-ablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (AuHCR) and radiation therapy (XRT). While data regarding treatment modalities for AT/RT patients exist, no comprehensive data have been published regarding the metastatic patients.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of 1578 articles published through September 2018, including 44 studies with a total of 123 subjects. In addition, seven patients were included through chart review of patients treated at Nationwide Children's Hospital.

RESULTS

Analysis of 130 patients revealed a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 25%. Age at diagnosis had a significant effect on survival (P = 0.0355); 3-year OS for infants less than 18 months was 21%, 18 to 36 months was 26%, and greater than 36 months was 36%. Location of the primary tumor, metastatic stage, and extent of surgical resection did not have a significant impact on OS. On univariate analysis, XRT (P < 0.0001), IT (P = 0.01), and AuHCR (P < 0.0001) were found to significantly improve survival. The most substantial effect was noted in patients who received AuHCR (3-year OS of 60% vs 9% in those who did not). On multivariable analysis, XRT (P = 0.0006), IT (P = 0.0124), and AuHCR (P < 0.0001) were independently associated with reduced risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more research is warranted to make generalizable conclusions, these results suggest that treatment regimens for patients with metastatic AT/RTs should include AuHCR, XRT, and IT.

Local Stage Dependent Necessity of Radiation Therapy in Rhabdoid Tumors of the Kidney (RTK)

PURPOSE

Rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (RTK) is one of the most aggressive childhood renal tumors. Overall survival ranges from 22% to 47%. The indication for radiation therapy (RT) in usually very young patients is an ongoing discussion. Recent protocols recommend RT independent of local stage, the latter being a good discriminator in other childhood kidney tumors. In this study, we analyze the evidence for RT in regard to risk factors, including tumor stage.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study analyzed 58 patients with RTK from Austria, Switzerland, and Germany treated in the framework of 4 consecutive, prospective renal/rhabdoid tumor studies from 1991 to 2014. All treatment protocols included multimodality treatment, including high-intensity chemotherapy, surgery, and RT.

RESULTS

Local stage distribution was not applicable, I, II, and III in 1, 6, 11, and 40, respectively. Twenty-nine (50%) patients had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Thirty-seven patients (64%) achieved complete remission, and 49% (18/37) relapsed. Thirty-four patients (60%) patients had progressive disease and died, 17 had local disease, 10 had combined disease, and 7 had distant disease; 2 treatment-related deaths were reported (3%). Twenty-one patients received RT during first-line treatment, 18 of them to all involved sites. Eight of the 34 cases of progressive disease occurred in irradiated patients. The local failure rate of treated patients with local stage II or III disease was 29% (6/18) in patients irradiated to all sites compared with 68% (15/22) in nonirradiated patients. One of 6 stage I patients received RT, and 1 patient experienced distant relapse (2-year progression-free and overall survival both 83% ± 15%). Progression-free survival for local stage II and III disease treated with RT, adjusted for early relapse or treatment abandonment, was 67% ± 11%, compared with 15% ± 7% without RT (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The 68% local failure rate in nonirradiated patients underlines the importance of local treatment. Our experience supports the use of RT for local control in higher stage disease. In contrast, no local relapse in 6 local stage I patients, including 5 nonirradiated patients, suggests omission of RT in this favorable subset of usually infant patients with RTK.