Do children and adolescents with completely resected alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma require adjuvant radiation? A report from the Children's Oncology Group

Common queries in managing rhabdomyosarcoma in low- and middle-income countries: An Indo-North American collaboration

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma among children and adolescents. The management of RMS involves risk stratification of the patients based on various clinicopathological characteristics. The multimodality treatment approach requires chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiation. The treatment of RMS necessitates the involvement of multiple disciplines, such as pathology, pediatric oncology, surgery, and radiation oncology. The disease heterogeneity, molecular testing, evolving treatment regimens, and limited resources are some of the challenges faced by clinicians while treating a patient with RMS in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this review, we endeavor to bring experts from varying fields to address clinicians' common questions while managing a child or adolescent with RMS in LMICs. This review is most applicable to level 2 centers in LMICs as per the levels of services described by the Adapted Treatment Regimens Working Group of the Pediatric Oncology in Developing Countries committee of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology.

Which Patients With Rhabdomyosarcoma Need Radiotherapy? Analysis of the Radiotherapy Strategies of the CWS-96 and CWS-2002P Studies and SoTiSaR Registry

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare the indications, doses, and application methods of radiotherapy (RT) and their influence on prognosis of patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

METHODS

One thousand four hundred seventy patients with localized RMS 21 years and younger entered on CWS-96, CWS-2002P, and SoTiSaR were eligible for the analysis. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (IQR, 3.3-9.5).

RESULTS

The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and local control survival (LCS) for 910 (62%) irradiated versus nonirradiated patients were 71% versus 69% and 78% versus 73% (P = .03), respectively. Ninety-five percent of patients in IRS I (90% embryonal RMS [eRMS]) were nonirradiated (EFS, 87%). Irradiated patients with IRS II had improved LCS (91% v 80%; P = .01) and EFS (not significant). In IRS III, EFS and LCS were significantly better for RT patients: 71% versus 56% (P = 3.1e-06) and 76% versus 61% (P = 4.1e-07). Patients with tumors in the head and neck region (orbita, parameningeal, and nonparameningeal) and in other sites had significantly better EFS and LCS and in parameningeal also overall survival (OS). The efficacy of low RT doses of 32 Gy (hyperfractionated, accelerated RT [HART]) and 36 and 41.4 Gy (conventional fractionated RT [CFRT]) in the favorable groups and higher doses of 44.8 Gy (HART) and 50.4 and 55.4 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups was comparable. Proton RT was used predominantly in head/neck-parameningeal (HN-PM) tumors, with similar EFS and LCS to photon RT.

CONCLUSION

RT can be omitted in patients with IRS I eRMS. RT improves LCS and EFS in IRS II and III. RT improves OS in patients with HN-PM, with proton RT comparable with photon RT. Doses of 32 Gy (HART) or 36 and 41.4 Gy (CFRT) had comparable efficacy in patients with favorable risk profiles and 44.8 Gy (HART) or 50.4 and 55.8 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups.

PAX-FOXO1 fusion status in children and adolescents with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: Impact on clinical, pathological, and survival features

BACKGROUND

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) is an aggressive pediatric cancer and cases with fusion PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX7-FOXO1 seem to have a poor prognosis. The aim is to evaluate whether PAX-FOXO1 alterations influence clinical outcome in childhood and adolescence population with ARMS.

PROCEDURE

A population-based study was conducted between 2011 and 2016 in patients less than 17 years with a diagnosis of ARMS. Overall survival (OS) depending on fusion status with clinical factors was analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 111 ARMS patients recorded in the French National Childhood Cancer Registry during the 2011-2016 period, 61% expressed PAX3-FOXO1, 15% expressed PAX7-FOXO1, 13% were FOXO1 fusion-positive without PAX specification, and 7% were PAX-FOXO1 negative (n = 4 missing data). Compared to patients with PAX7-FOXO1 positive ARMS, those with PAX3-FOXO1 positive tumor were significantly older (10-17 years: 57.4% vs. 29.4%), and had more often a metastatic disease (54.4% vs. 23.5%). Poorer 5-year OS for patients with PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX not specified FOXO1-positive tumor were observed (44.0% [32.0-55.4] and 35.7% [13.1-59.4], respectively). After adjustment for stage at diagnosis, patients with positive tumor for PAX3-FOXO1 were 3.6-fold more likely to die than those with positive tumor for PAX7-FOXO1.

CONCLUSION

At the population level, PAX3-FOXO1 was associated with a significant higher risk of death compared to PAX7-FOXO1-positive and PAX-FOXO1-negative tumors, and could explain poorer 5-year OS observed in adolescence population diagnosed with ARMS. A continuous risk score derived from the combination of clinical parameters with PAX3-FOXO1 fusion status represents a robust approach to improving current risk-adapted therapy for ARMS.

[Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: novel surrogate markers associated with oncogenic translocation]

BACKGROUND

Anomalies of the FOXO1 gene in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma are associated with a worse clinical prognosis, which determines the high value of studying the status of this gene when choosing a therapy strategy. The «gold standard» for determining FOXO1 gene rearrangements is currently the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique.

OBJECTIVE

Study of the relationship between canonical FOXO1 translocation and immunohistochemical expression of new surrogate markers in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma to determine their predictive value.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

139 cases of rhabdomyosarcoma were retrospectively studied. The study used tissue matrix technology (TMA). On sections obtained from TMA blocks, the FISH technique was implemented using the locus-specific probe MetaSystems XL FOXO1 Break Apart (Metasystems, Germany). Immunohistochemical studies were performed on similar sections from TMA blocks with OLIG2 (Cell Marque Antibodies, clone 211F1.1) and MUC4 (Cell Marque Antibodies, clone 8G7) antibodies.

RESULTS

The final expression analysis and statistical processing using a 2x2 contingency table and Fisher's exact test passed 111 cases (76 without FOXO1 rearrangement and 35 with rearrangement). The specificity of OLIG2 and MUC4 expression for FOXO1-rearranged alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma was 85.53% and 80.26%, respectively (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms the high predictive value of the expression of surrogate markers OLIG2 and MUC4 in determining the genetic status of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, which makes it possible to predict with high specificity the detection of the FOXO1 gene rearrangement.

Surgical treatment for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma: longitudinal national questionnaire survey in Japan

BACKGROUND

Extremity rhabdomyosarcoma differs from other soft tissue sarcomas, being highly sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and having a high rate of metastasis to lymph nodes. Therefore, the treatment modality differs from that of other soft tissue sarcomas. The purpose of this study was to conduct a longitudinal questionnaire survey of orthopedic oncologists in charge of surgical treatment for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma in Japan to determine whether the treatment modality chosen here is in line with the international and national treatment ones.

METHODS

Questionnaire surveys were conducted in 2012 and 2019 to orthopedic oncologists of Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 80 facilities and 76 facilities, respectively. Fewer than 50% of the facilities treated one or more patients a year in both years. Many facilities first performed diagnostic biopsy, but most did not perform pretreatment re-excision. The number of facilities that provided radiotherapy in addition to surgery increased significantly from 2012 to 2019 (P = 0.028), but it was still 21% in 2019. The number of facilities performing excision and lymph node dissection was 19% in both 2012 and 2019, which was a very low result without improvement. The departments responsible for follow-up have been changed to pediatrics and orthopedic oncology in tandem (P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy and pathological evaluation of lymph nodes are important for improving the prognosis of patients with extremity rhabdomyosarcoma. It is necessary to continue and develop more efficient educational activities on the appropriate medical treatment modalities for extremity RMS.

Clinical features and prognosis of paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma with bone marrow metastasis: a single Centre experiences in China

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to summarize the clinical characteristics, therapeutic effects and prognosis of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and bone marrow metastasis, improve the understanding of this disease.

METHOD

This was a single-institution retrospective study involving the children with RMS, who presented with bone marrow metastasis at initial presentation to our hospital between 1st, Jan, 2006 and 31st, Dec,2019. Follow-up concluded on 31st, Dec, 2020 and the clinical data were collected and analysed.

RESULT

Between 1st Jan 2006 and 31st Dec 2019, 13 eligible patients presented to our hospital, including 10 males and 3 females, these eligible patients accounted for 4.5% of all RMS patients. The median age at onset was 5.6 years (range 1.7-14 years). The patients not only had unfavourable primary sites, but also had multiple metastases. The bone marrow aspirate samples of the patients comprised 8-95% blast-like cells. Nine of 13 patients were misdiagnosed with haematological malignancies or other solid tumours. With respect to histology, four of 13 children were classified as embryonal RMS and nine as alveolar RMS. Eleven patients underwent PAX-FOXO1 fusion testing; eight had the POX- FOXO1 fusion gene. Immunohistochemically(IHC) analysis revealed that the tumour cells were positive for Desmin, Vimentin, Myo-D1 and Myogenin. More importantly, the patients had extremely poor prognoses, the median EFS was 12.0 months (range 3-28.3 months) and the median OS was 27.0 months (range6-46.2 months).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that children with RMS and bone marrow metastasis usually exhibit atypical primary sites and multiple metastases, with presentation mimicking haematological malignancies or other solid tumors at initial presentation. Pathology and IHC analysis combined with POX-FOXO1 fusion gene detections can effectively confirm the diagnosis. These patients are more likely to relapse or progress during early treatment and are prone to intracranial metastasis. While multidisciplinary therapy combined with Temozolomide may prevent it, further prospective research is required to evaluate the therapeutic effects.