1
|
Bentzen SM, Vogelius IR, Hodgson D, Howell R, Jackson A, Hua CH, Olch AJ, Ronckers C, Kremer L, Milano M, Marks LB, Constine LS. Radiation Dose-Volume-Response Relationships for Adverse Events in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Introduction to the Scientific Issues in PENTEC. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:338-353. [PMID: 38760115 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
At its very core, radiation oncology involves a trade-off between the benefits and risks of exposing tumors and normal tissue to relatively high doses of ionizing radiation. This trade-off is particularly critical in childhood cancer survivors (CCS), in whom both benefits and risks can be hugely consequential due to the long life expectancy if the primary cancer is controlled. Estimating the normal tissue-related risks of a specific radiation therapy plan in an individual patient relies on predictive mathematical modeling of empirical data on adverse events. The Pediatric Normal-Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) collaborative network was formed to summarize and, when possible, to synthesize dose-volume-response relationships for a range of adverse events incident in CCS based on the literature. Normal-tissue clinical radiation biology in children is particularly challenging for many reasons: (1) Childhood malignancies are relatively uncommon-constituting approximately 1% of new incident cancers in the United States-and biologically heterogeneous, leading to many small series in the literature and large variability within and between series. This creates challenges in synthesizing data across series. (2) CCS are at an elevated risk for a range of adverse health events that are not specific to radiation therapy. Thus, excess relative or absolute risk compared with a reference population becomes the appropriate metric. (3) Various study designs and quantities to express risk are found in the literature, and these are summarized. (4) Adverse effects in CCS often occur 30, 50, or more years after therapy. This limits the information content of series with even very extended follow-up, and lifetime risk estimates are typically extrapolations that become dependent on the mathematical model used. (5) The long latent period means that retrospective dosimetry is required, as individual computed tomography-based radiation therapy plans gradually became available after 1980. (6) Many individual patient-level factors affect outcomes, including age at exposure, attained age, lifestyle exposures, health behaviors, other treatment modalities, dose, fractionation, and dose distribution. (7) Prospective databases with individual patient-level data and radiation dosimetry are being built and will facilitate advances in dose-volume-response modeling. We discuss these challenges and attempts to overcome them in the setting of PENTEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cecile Ronckers
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Leontien Kremer
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silva W, Virtanen E, Kajantie E, Sebert S. Cognition, mental health and quality of life amongst siblings of preterm born children: A systematic review. Acta Paediatr 2024; 113:654-669. [PMID: 38216530 DOI: 10.1111/apa.17105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
AIM Globally, 1 in 10 babies are born preterm. Families with preterm born infants may suffer strains related to the presence of a preterm child. To date, most evidence focuses on the outcome of children born preterm and of their parents. Our objective was to investigate the evidence on the impact of having a preterm born sibling on cognitive function, mental health and quality of life of term-born siblings and critically appraise the evidence. METHODS We searched five electronic databases, Google Scholar and reference lists. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, data extraction and critical appraisal. RESULTS We retrieved 9121 articles. After duplicates, titles, abstract and full text review, seven studies met the inclusion criteria. One study reported higher anxiety and depression scores on index cases in the term born comparison group, compared to the index cases in the preterm born sibling group. Another study reported more feelings of reduced parental attention, and more interpersonal problems in the preterm born sibling group, than the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS Although two studies reported a difference in outcomes between index cases in preterm born sibling groups and comparison groups, the scarce evidence did not allow us to delineate an effect or lack of it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wnurinham Silva
- Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eeva Virtanen
- Department of Population Health, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Kajantie
- Department of Population Health, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland
- Clinical Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Pediatric Research Centre, Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sylvain Sebert
- Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Desai A, Sutradhar R, Lau C, Widger K, Lee DS, Nathan PC, Gupta S. Morbidity and healthcare use among mothers of children with cancer: A population-based study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30612. [PMID: 37543725 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of a child's cancer diagnosis on subsequent maternal physical health is unclear. METHODS We identified all Ontario children diagnosed less than 18 years with cancer between 1992 and 2017. Linkage to administrative databases identified mothers who were matched to population controls. We identified physical health conditions, acute healthcare use, and preventive healthcare use through validated algorithms using healthcare data, and compared them between exposed (child with cancer) and unexposed mothers. Predictors of health outcomes were assessed among exposed mothers. RESULTS We identified 5311 exposed mothers and 19,516 matched unexposed mothers. For exposed mothers, median age at last follow-up was 48 years, (interquartile range: 42-53). Exposed mothers had an increased risk of cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.0-1.5, p = .03), but not of any other adverse physical outcomes or of increased acute healthcare use. Exposed mothers were more likely to receive influenza vaccinations (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3-1.5, p < .0001), and underwent cancer screening at the same rate as unexposed mothers. Among exposed mothers, bereavement was associated with a subsequent increased risk of cancer (HR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.5, p = .004) and death (HR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = .01). CONCLUSION Mothers of children with cancer are at increased risk of developing cancer, but not of other adverse physical health outcomes, and were equally or more likely to be adherent to preventive healthcare practices. Bereaved mothers were at increased risk of subsequent cancer and death. Interventions targeting specific subpopulations of mothers of children with cancer or focused on screening for specific cancers may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Desai
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Cancer Research Program, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cindy Lau
- Cancer Research Program, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kim Widger
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas S Lee
- Cancer Research Program, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Cancer Research Program, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Evaluation and Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sumit Gupta
- Cancer Research Program, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Evaluation and Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|