The effect of a vanishing twin on first- and second-trimester maternal serum markers and ultrasound screening for aneuploidy

A vanishing twin (VT) is the early demise of a twin fetus. It is estimated to occur in 20-30% of pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technology. VT becomes increasingly prominent when assisted fertilization is used, because one or more embryos are transferred to the uterus. Maternal serum screening tests during pregnancy can screen for trisomy chromosomes 21, 18, and 13 and are divided into first- and second-trimester tests. In singleton pregnancies, the first trimester screening test is performed at 11-13 weeks and 6 days of gestation. It consists of two serum markers, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and measures nuchal translucency thickness. The second-trimester screening test was performed at 15-20 weeks and 6 days of gestation. It consists of four serum markers: alpha-fetoprotein, β-hCG, unconjugated estriol, and inhibin A. More effective screening for trisomy 21 in singleton pregnancies is achieved by analyzing cell-free DNA in the maternal blood. A VT includes a demise of the fetus. Although it affects maternal serum markers, it has not been corrected. Five studies examined the effect of VT on maternal serum markers, but the results were controversial. This study aimed to review the patterns of changes in maternal serum markers in VTs, interpret prenatal tests for pregnant women with VTs in clinical practice, and consider what information should be provided.

The Effect of Vanishing Twin on First- and Second-Trimester Maternal Serum Markers and Nuchal Translucency: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of vanishing twin (VT) on maternal serum marker concentrations and nuchal translucency (NT).

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study in 12 institutions. Serum concentrations of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in the first trimester and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), total human chorionic gonadotrophin, unconjugated estriol, and inhibin A in the second trimester were measured, and NT was measured between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

Among 6,793 pregnant women, 5,381 women were measured for serum markers in the first or second trimester, including 65 cases in the VT group and 5,316 cases in the normal singleton group. The cases in the VT group had a higher median multiple of the median value of AFP and inhibin A than the normal singleton group. The values of other serum markers and NT were not different between the two groups. After the permutation test with adjustment, AFP and inhibin A remained significant differences. The frequency of abnormally increased AFP was also higher in the VT group than in the normal singleton group.

CONCLUSION

VT can be considered as an adjustment factor for risk assessment in the second-trimester serum screening test.

Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21 in Patients with a Vanishing Twin

A vanishing twin (VT) occurs in up to 30% of early diagnosed twin pregnancies and is associated with an increased risk of fetal aneuploidy. Here, we describe our experience in a large VT population of 847 patients that underwent noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common fetal trisomies over a three-year period. All patients underwent an ultrasound examination prior to NIPT. Two comparison populations were included, namely, the singleton (n = 105,560) and the viable multiple gestation pregnancy samples (n = 9691) collected over the same period. All NIPT samples in the VT population received a result, of which 14 were high-risk for trisomy 21 (1.6%), nine for trisomy 18 (1.1%), and six for trisomy 13 (0.7%). Diagnostic testing confirmed the presence of trisomy 21 in 6/12 samples, giving a positive predictive value of 50%. One trisomy 18 case and no trisomy 13 cases were confirmed. The time between fetal demise and NIPT sampling did not appear to affect the number of true- or false-positive cases. In conclusion, NIPT is an effective screening method for trisomy 21 in the surviving fetus(es) in VT pregnancies. For trisomies 18 and 13, a positive NIPT should be interpreted carefully and ultrasound monitoring is preferrable over invasive diagnostic testing.

The vanishing twin: Diagnosis and implications

Vanishing twin syndrome (VTS), defined by first-trimester spontaneous loss of a twin, is a common phenomenon with a reported prevalence of 15-35% of twin pregnancies. The etiology of VTS is obscure. Still, several risk factors have been identified, including an increased number of embryos transferred in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization, an initial increased number of gestational sacs and advanced maternal age. The effect of VTS on obstetric and perinatal outcomes is controversial. Several studies have reported that pregnancies with VTS were associated with increased risk for preterm birth and small for gestational age neonates compared to singleton pregnancies, while others showed no difference in perinatal outcomes. The prevalence of placental vascular and anatomic abnormalities such as small placentas was higher in VTS. These findings lay an essential foundation for understanding how this phenomenon affects obstetric and perinatal outcomes of the surviving pregnancy.

Screening for aneuploidy in twins

All pregnant women should be offered screening for aneuploidy. Twin pregnancies present unique challenges in aneuploidy screening. This review describes available aneuploidy screening options and their benefits and limitations in twin pregnancy, along with describing special circumstances, such as vanishing twins and diagnostic testing in twin pregnancy. No method of aneuploidy screening is as accurate in twin pregnancies as singleton pregnancies. Cell-free DNA screening should be considered a first-line approach; however, this option may not be available or may have limitations in certain clinical scenarios, such as vanishing twins. If cell-free DNA screening is not available, nuchal translucency and/or maternal serum marker screening can be offered.

Committee Opinion No. 418: The Complete 11-14 Week Prenatal Sonographic Examination

OBJECTIVE

Sonography during the first trimester provides an opportunity to assess a pregnancy in its early stage. This document provides an opinion about the implementation and content of prenatal sonographic examinations at 11-14 weeks gestation in Canada.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant women at 11-14 weeks gestation.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

The 11-14 week prenatal sonographic examination can provide important information that may contribute to pregnancy management. It can be used to confirm viability, establish gestational age, determine the number of fetuses, assess the adnexa/ovaries, and, in a multiple pregnancy, assess chorionicity and amnionicity. Scanning also offers an opportunity to detect fetal abnormalities and perform aneuploidy screening by measuring the nuchal translucency thickness. It may be valuable in screening for preeclampsia and other obstetrical disorders (by combining uterine artery Doppler scanning with other bio-clinical markers) and for invasive placentation. There are no physical harms to mother or fetus from offering a routine 11-14 week prenatal sonographic examination, and there are no extra costs for patients.

EVIDENCE

Articles related to routine 11-14 week prenatal sonography were identified in a search of EMBASE and MEDLINE using the search terms first trimester ultrasound, nuchal translucency, and 11-14 week ultrasound. The search included all articles published on the topic until May 2019. Abstracts were reviewed by one author, and articles deemed relevant were then reviewed in full to determine whether to include them in the study. Articles that were not in English and articles that did not pertain to 11-14 week prenatal sonography were excluded.

INTENDED AUDIENCE

This document is intended for sonographers, midwives, family physicians, obstetricians, and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.

Applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in vanishing twin syndrome pregnancies after treatment of assisted reproductive technology in a single center

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to assess the clinical application of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for VTS pregnancies after the treatment of assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHOD

This was a retrospective study on VTS pregnancies through ART treatment. Participants underwent NIPT at 11 to 13 weeks gestation by sequencing. Resampling was recommended for both positive and testing failure cases. For NIPT positive results, participants were advised to have invasive testing. Clinical outcomes were obtained by telephone interview.

RESULTS

In total of 579 cases, testing failure rates after first sampling and resampling were 7.6% and 1.4%, respectively. Twelve positive results were reported by NIPT. But only one true positive was confirmed, giving a PPV of 8%. A total of 576 cases completed the follow-up (including 533 NIPT negative, 12 positive, and 31 testing failure) and three cases lost follow-up. Among the 536 cases with NIPT negative results, 504 (94.0%) resulted in live-birth and 29 (5.4%) resulted in miscarriage or stillbirths. No false-negative result was reported.

CONCLUSION

NIPT has the potential to be used in prenatal screening for VTS pregnancies. For the pregnant women who obtained positive and testing failure results, resampling after 15 weeks of gestation is recommended.

Imaging findings in association with altered maternal alpha-fetoprotein levels during pregnancy

Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein is a valuable laboratory test used in pregnant women as an indicator to detect certain clinical abnormalities. These can be grouped into four main categories: fetal factors, pregnancy complications, placental abnormalities, and maternal factors. Imaging is an invaluable tool to investigate the various etiologies leading to altered maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein. By reading this article, the radiologist, sonologist, or other health care practitioner should be able to define the probable pathology leading to the laboratory detected abnormal maternal serum levels, thus helping the clinician to appropriately manage the pregnancy and counsel the patient.

Should vanishing twin pregnancies be systematically excluded from cell-free fetal DNA testing?

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in vanishing twin (VT) pregnancies in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Our study included 24 874 singleton and 206 VT consecutive pregnancies. Cell-free DNA was analyzed by massively parallel sequencing. Both aneuploidy analysis (chromosomes 13,18, 21, X, and Y) and fetal fraction estimation were performed according to an Illumina algorithm. Contaminant DNA contribution from the demised co-twin was studied in detail.

RESULTS

VT pregnancies exhibited a higher prevalence of screen-positive cases (5.8% vs 2.5%), sex discrepancies (10.2% vs 0.05%), and false positive rates (FPR) (2.6% vs 0.3%) than singleton pregnancies. However, their incidence was significantly lower in tests performed after the 14th week (screen-positive cases: 3.1%; sex discrepancies: 7.8%; and FPR: 0.8%). Among the 12 cases in which cfDNA was performed at two time points, fading of contaminating cfDNA was observed in four cases with a sex discrepancy and in one false positive for trisomy 18, resulting in a final correct result.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest VT pregnancies could be included in cfDNA testing as long as it is applied after the 14th week of pregnancy. However, future studies to validate our findings are needed before including VT cases in routine clinical practice. Once established, unnecessary invasive procedures could be avoided, mitigating negative emotional impact on future mothers.

First-trimester screening for trisomies in pregnancies with vanishing twin

OBJECTIVES

To examine multiples of the median (MoM) values of serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in a large series of pregnancies with a vanishing twin, determine the association of these values with the interval between embryonic death and blood sampling, and develop a model that would allow incorporation of these metabolites in first-trimester combined screening for trisomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study comparing maternal serum free β-hCG and PAPP-A levels at 11-13 weeks' gestation in 528 dichorionic pregnancies with a vanishing twin, including 194 (36.7%) with an empty gestational sac and 334 (63.3%) with a dead embryo, with those in 5280 normal singleton pregnancies matched for method of conception and date of examination. In vanishing-twin pregnancies with a dead embryo, marker levels were examined in relation to the estimated time between embryonic death and maternal blood sampling.

RESULTS

First, in pregnancies with a vanishing twin, median free β-hCG MoM was not significantly different from that in normal singleton pregnancies (1.000; 95% CI, 0.985-1.016 vs 0.995; 95% CI, 0.948-1.044; P = 0.849). Second, PAPP-A MoM was higher in vanishing-twin pregnancies than in normal singleton pregnancies (1.000; 95% CI, 0.985-1.015), both in the group with an empty gestational sac (1.165; 95% CI, 1.080-1.256; P = 0.0001) and in that with a dead embryo (1.175; 95% CI, 1.105-1.249; P < 0.0001). Third, in vanishing-twin pregnancies with a dead embryo, PAPP-A MoM was related inversely to the interval between estimated gestational age at embryonic demise and blood sampling (P < 0.0001). Fourth, in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in singleton pregnancies, the estimated detection rate, at a 5% false-positive rate, was 82% in screening by a combination of maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness, and this increased to 86% with the addition of serum free β-hCG and to 91% with the addition of serum PAPP-A. Fifth, similar performance of screening can be achieved in pregnancies with a vanishing twin, provided the appropriate adjustments are made to the level of PAPP-A for the interval between estimated gestational age at embryonic demise and blood sampling.

CONCLUSIONS

First-trimester screening for trisomy in pregnancies with a vanishing twin should rely on a combination of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness and serum free β-hCG, as in singleton pregnancy, without the use of serum PAPP-A. Alternatively, PAPP-A can be included but only after appropriate adjustment for the interval between estimated gestational age at fetal demise and blood sampling. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Usefulness and reliability of cell free fetal DNA screening for main trisomies in case of atypical profile on first trimester maternal serum screening

Background

Patients with atypical values of HCG and/or PAPP-A are at higher risk of chromosomal abnormality and vascular complications of pregnancy. The performance of cfDNA in this particular population has not yet been evaluated.

Objectives

The primary objective was to evaluate the usefulness and reliability of cfDNA in screening for trisomy 21, 18 and 13 for patients with HCG < 0.25 multiple of median (MoM), HCG > 5.0 MoM and/or PAPP-A < 0.25 MoM, PAPP-A > 2.5 MoM. The secondary objective was to evaluate the contribution of cfDNA assay for the prediction of pregnancy’s vascular complications.

Method

Between June 2016 and July 2017, we analysed a women cohort from all over France who had at least one first trimester serum biomarker outside of normal range, in a retrospective, observational and multicentre study. Patients were included if they had a single pregnancy, normal first trimester ultrasound examination, whatever the result of the combined first trimester screening test was. The cfDNA was analysed by massive parallel sequencing technique. The accuracy of cfDNA assay was evaluated by calculation of sensitivity and specificity, and multivariate regression analysis was used to search for predictive factors for pregnancy’s vascular complications.

Results

Among the 498 patients who underwent a cfDNA assay in this context, twenty-one (4.2%) were excluded because of loss to follow-up. Out of 477, test failure occurred for four patients initially, reduced to two patients (0.4%) after redrawn. CfDNA was positive for Trisomy 21 (n = 19), Trisomy 18 (n = 6) and Trisomy 13 (n = 1) and negative in 449. The sensitivity of cfDNA assay for trisomy 21 screening was 100% (19/19) (IC 95% 82.4–100) and specificity 100% (458/458) (IC 95% 99.2–100). Among the 447 patients included for prediction of vascular complications, there were four cases of pregnancy induced hypertension and 10 cases of preeclampsia, for which no predictive factor was identified. Intra Uterine growth restriction under 5th percentile (n = 44, 9.8%) was significantly associated with a low fetal fraction (OR = 0.87, IC 95% 0.79–0.96, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

cfDNA assay is an effective and reliable tool for women with atypical profile of first trimester serum biomarkers.

Ultrasound surveillance in twin pregnancy: An update for practitioners

Ultrasound has revolutionised the management of multiple pregnancies and their complications. Increasing frequency of twin pregnancies mandates familiarity of all clinicians with the relevant pathologies and evidence-based surveillance and management protocols for their care. In this review, we summarise the latest evidence relating to ultrasound surveillance of twin pregnancies including first trimester assessment and screening, growth surveillance and the detection and management of the complications of monochorionic pregnancies including twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction, twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence and conjoined twinning.

Nuchal translucency measurement, free β-hCG and PAPP-A concentrations in IVF/ICSI pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis

So far, data on the effect of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) on the components of first trimester combined screening for Down syndrome are still controversial. A systematic search of the literature was performed in order to identify the effect of ART, particularly in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh embryo transfer, on the nuchal translucency, free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A measurements. Moreover, a meta-analysis and a descriptive graphical representation of the ratios between ART and spontaneous pregnancies (controls) values of median of the multiple of median (m₀ MoM) were performed. Free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin test showed slightly higher values in the ICSI group than controls (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.03-1.16) but not in the IVF group (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.94-1.12). Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A values for IVF/ICSI, IVF and ICSI showed lower values in comparison with controls (RR, 95%CI 0.85, 0.80-0.90; 0.82, 0.74-0.89 and 0.83, 0.79-0.86, respectively). The nuchal translucency measurement did not show any statistical differences between study groups (IVF and ICSI) and controls (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.94-1.08 and RR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.97-1.05, respectively). These results may be due to alterations in the placentation of ART pregnancies. Differentiating further subgroups of ART pregnancies may explain the differences in biomarker concentrations, in prenatal behavior and in obstetric outcomes between ART and spontaneous pregnancies. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A review of the mechanisms and evidence for typical and atypical twinning

The mechanisms responsible for twinning and disorders of twin gestations have been the subject of considerable interest by physicians and scientists, and cases of atypical twinning have called for a reexamination of the fundamental theories invoked to explain twin gestations. This article presents a review of the literature focusing on twinning and atypical twinning with an emphasis on the phenomena of chimeric twins, phenotypically discordant monozygotic twins, mirror-image twins, polar body twins, complete hydatidiform mole with a coexistent twin, vanishing twins, fetus papyraceus, fetus in fetu, superfetation, and superfecundation. The traditional models attributing monozygotic twinning to a fission event, and more recent models describing monozygotic twinning as a fusion event, are critically reviewed. Ethical restrictions on scientific experimentation with human embryos and the rarity of cases of atypical twinning have limited opportunities to elucidate the exact mechanisms by which these phenomena occur. Refinements in the modeling of early embryonic development in twin pregnancies may have significant clinical implications. The article includes a series of figures to illustrate the phenomena described.

Setting up a Nuchal Translucency Clinic: What Radiologists Need to Know

The purpose of this article was to discuss the process of setting up a nuchal translucency (NT) screening clinic in clinical practice, how to interpret the information in combination with other clinical tests, what to do if abnormal results are obtained, and to illustrate some of the fetal anomalies that are associated with an increased NT. The NT was initially implemented to predict the likelihood of a fetus with Down syndrome. Maternal age can be combined with fetal NT and maternal serum biochemistry (free β-hCG and PAPP-A) at 11 to 14 weeks to identify about 90% of affected fetuses. Setting up a clinic to perform the NT screening requires certified physicians and certified sonographers. Certification can be obtained for both physicians and sonographers through Nuchal Translucency Quality Review and Fetal Medicine Foundation. Cell-free DNA testing is now altering what our patients are choosing to evaluate fetuses at risk for chromosomal anomalies and congenital anomalies. Common pitfalls to performing, interpreting, and conveying results of the NT are illustrated in this article. Nasal bone measurement, fetal anatomy examination and fetal echocardiography are tools that add sensitivity to the detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Examples of fetal anomalies discovered during the NT screening are also illustrated. Screening for obstetric complications is an additional benefit to the NT clinic.

Screening and Invasive Testing in Twins

Prenatal screening and testing for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies poses a number of challenges: the exact estimate of the a priori risk of trisomy 21, the choice of prenatal screening test and/or invasive techniques to employ for the diagnosis and the impact of the result on the options of treatment in case of discordant results within a twin pair or among multiples. These different aspects are discussed below while recognizing that many issues remain unresolved.

Maternal serum analyte screening for fetal aneuploidy

In the first and second trimesters, chemicals produced by the fetoplacental unit are measured to assess risks of fetal abnormalities. Consistent associations between levels of these proteins in such pregnancies enable these biomarkers to be used to calculate risk for Down syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities in individual pregnancies. Special consideration may be required when assessing risk in multiple pregnancies and pregnancies achieved with infertility therapy.

Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations

Twin gestations face an increased risk of structural abnormalities compared with singleton gestations, as well as an increased risk of aneuploidy. Accordingly, there is a need for accurate prenatal diagnosis of fetal genetic disorders and structural anomalies in twin gestations. Given the increased risk of congenital anomalies, a detailed sonographic survey of fetal anatomy is recommended in the early second trimester of twin gestations. In addition, fetal echocardiography should be considered in monochorionic twin gestations and in dichorionic twin pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technologies given the increased risk of congenital heart disease in these populations. Although first- and second-trimester aneuploidy screening in twin gestations is available, screening is less accurate than in singleton gestations. Invasive prenatal diagnosis in twin pregnancies is associated with a risk of pregnancy loss that is higher than the baseline risk of loss among twin gestations. Precise procedure-related loss rates in twin gestations undergoing chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, however, remain unclear because of methodological differences between published studies investigating diagnostic procedures in twins.

Are first-trimester screening markers altered in assisted reproductive technologies pregnancies?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current literature on first-trimester screening with respect to specific issues for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) singleton and twin pregnancies.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of different first-trimester sonographic and biochemical markers have been validated in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Among sonographic markers, measurement of fetal nuchal translucency is the most investigated and least affected screening method in ART pregnancies, achieving comparable results in singletons and twins compared with spontaneous conceptions. The small deviation of nuchal translucency thickness observed in ART singletons did not influence overall screening performance, including the number of false-positive results. First-trimester maternal serum free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels are more obviously altered in assisted conceptions and carry the risk of higher false-positive rates if not adjusted accordingly. The reason behind the alterations is currently not quite explored, but might be attributed to infertility and a higher incidence of placental disorders rather than to the use of ART. In twin pregnancies, chorionicity is an important confounding variable with evident impact on nuchal translucency measurements and maternal biochemistry, but both issues have not been sufficiently investigated in ART twins so far.

SUMMARY

First-trimester measurement of fetal nuchal translucency in singleton and twin gestations is associated with similar screening results when compared with spontaneous conception. Adjustments for the mode of conception are required if maternal serum biochemistry is included in the screening algorithm. Further studies on assisted conception twins are essential to permit more conclusive results on this issue.