The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature

Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing

Prenatal diagnoses of congenital malformations have increased significantly in recent years with use of high-resolution prenatal imaging. Despite more precise radiological diagnoses, discussions with expectant parents remain challenging because congenital malformations are associated with a wide spectrum of outcomes. Comprehensive prenatal genetic testing has become an essential tool that improves the accuracy of prognostication. Testing strategies include chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing. The diagnostic yield varies depending on the specific malformations, severity of the abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement. The utility of prenatal genetic diagnosis includes increased diagnostic clarity for clinicians and families, informed pregnancy decision-making, neonatal care planning, and reproductive planning. Turnaround time for results of comprehensive genetic testing remains a barrier, especially for parents that are decision-making, although this has improved over time. Uncertainty inherent to many genetic testing results is a challenge. Appropriate genetic counseling is essential for parents to understand the diagnosis and prognosis and to make informed decisions. Recent research has investigated the yield of exome or genome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses, both with non-invasive screening methods and invasive diagnostic testing; the prenatal diagnostic community must evaluate and analyze the significant ethical considerations associated with this practice prior to generalizing its use. IMPACT: Reviews available genetic testing options during the prenatal period in detail. Discusses the impact of prenatal genetic testing on care using case-based examples. Consolidates the current literature on the yield of genetic testing for prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis and karyotyping in fetuses with isolated choroid plexus cyst: A retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the the diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with isolated CPC (iCPC).

METHODS

A total of 315 fetuses with iCPC (iCPC group) and 364 fetuses without abnormal ultrasound findings (control group) were recruited between July 2014 to March 2018.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic yield of chromosomal abnormalities by CMA and karyotyping in iCPC group was up to 4.1 %, higher than 1.4 % in the control group, p < 0.05. The detection rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) with clinical significance by CMA in iCPC group (1.3 %) was higher than in control group (0 %), p < 0.05. According to the type of chromosome abnormalities, the missed diagnosis rate of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was 1.6 % in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of iCPC on ultrasound examination suggests a potential indication for genetic counseling. Karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis may be considered for fetuses with iCPC. It is important to be aware of the limitations of non-invasive prenatal testing, as there is a possibility of residual risk.

Whole-genome sequencing in prenatally detected congenital malformations: prospective cohort study in clinical setting

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic yield of trio whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in fetuses with various congenital malformations referred to a tertiary center for prenatal diagnosis.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 50 pregnancies with different congenital malformations, negative for trisomies and causative copy-number variants, were analyzed further with fetal-parental trio WGS analysis. Parents were eligible for inclusion if they accepted further investigation following the detection of isolated or multiple malformations on prenatal ultrasound. Cases with isolated increased nuchal translucency, gamete donation or multiple pregnancy were excluded. WGS with the Illumina Inc. 30× polymerase-chain-reaction-free short-read sequencing included analysis of single-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, structural variants, short tandem repeats and copy-number identification of SMN1 and SMN2 genes.

RESULTS

A molecular diagnosis was achieved in 13/50 (26%) cases. Causative sequence variants were identified in 12 genes: FGFR3 (n = 2), ACTA1 (n = 1), CDH2 (n = 1), COL1A2 (n = 1), DHCR7 (n = 1), EYA1 (n = 1), FBXO11 (n = 1), FRAS1 (n = 1), L1CAM (n = 1), OFD1 (n = 1), PDHA1 (n = 1) and SOX9 (n = 1). The phenotypes of the cases were divided into different groups, with the following diagnostic yields: skeletal malformation (4/9 (44%)), multisystem malformation (3/7 (43%)), central nervous system malformation (5/15 (33%)) and thoracic malformation (1/10 (10%)). Additionally, two cases carried variants that were considered potentially clinically relevant, even though they were assessed as variants of uncertain significance, according to the guidelines provided by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Overall, we identified a causative or potentially clinically relevant variant in 15/50 (30%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a diagnostic yield of 26% with clinical WGS in prenatally detected congenital malformations. This study emphasizes the benefits that WGS can bring to the diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. It is important to note that causative chromosomal aberrations were excluded from our cohort before WGS. As chromosomal aberrations are a well-known cause of prenatally detected congenital malformations, future studies using WGS as a primary diagnostic test, including assessment of chromosomal aberrations, may show that the detection rate exceeds the diagnostic yield of this study. WGS can add clinically relevant information, explaining the underlying cause of the fetal anomaly, which will provide information concerning the specific prognosis of the condition, as well as estimate the risk of recurrence. A genetic diagnosis can also provide more reproductive choice for future pregnancies. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The Role of Preprocedure Genetic Counseling in Pregnancies Interrupted for Fetal Abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

Congenital birth defects affect 3 to 5% of pregnancies. Genetic counseling can help patients navigate the testing process and understand results. The study objective was to identify predictors and utility of genetic counseling at the time of pregnancy termination. Additionally, we aimed to see what proportion of patients would benefit from additional testing based on the results of the genetic testing.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort review of all terminations performed for fetal anomalies by an academic center from July 2016 to May 2020. Indications were stratified by abnormal serum screening or types of abnormal ultrasound findings. Data were abstracted regarding uptake of genetic counseling and testing results. Abnormal results that warranted additional testing regarding recurrence risks were noted. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of receipt of genetic counseling and testing.

RESULTS

Of 387 patients, 57% (n = 220) received preprocedure genetic counseling and 43% (n = 167) did not. Among patients who received diagnostic testing, 62% (n = 194) had genetic counseling compared with 38% (n = 121) without counseling (adjusted odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval [1.41-4.29], p < 0.001). Among the entire cohort, 38% (n = 148) had suspected aneuploidy based on serum screening. Of these, 89% (n = 132/148) had definitive testing, 92% (n = 122/132) confirming the aneuploidy. Among the other 68% (n = 239) with structural anomalies, 76% (n = 183) had diagnostic testing with 29% (n = 53) yielding an abnormal result. Among those fetuses with structural anomalies, 36% (n = 19/53) of genetic diagnoses warranted additional parental testing because of risk of recurrence compared with only 2% (n = 2/122) of patients with abnormal serum screening results alone.

CONCLUSION

Genetic counseling was associated with increased uptake of diagnostic testing, which yielded useful information and prompted additional testing. This is important for determining etiology and recurrence risk and should be offered to patients presenting for termination for fetal indications, as well as providing diagnostic closure for patients.

KEY POINTS

· Genetic counseling increases the uptake of diagnostic testing in patients with fetal anomalies.. · Patients with ultrasound anomalies received less diagnostic testing despite actionable results 36% of the time.. · Genetic testing is invaluable for recurrence risk counseling even if patients chose to terminate..

Apparently isolated ventricular septal defect, prenatal diagnosis, association with chromosomal aberrations, spontaneous closure rate in utero and during the first year of life: a systematic review

AIM

To evaluate the incidence of chromosomal aberrations in apparently isolated ventricular septal defects (VSD), quantify the timing of diagnosis of prenatally diagnosed VSDs, and define the spontaneous closure rate prenatally both in utero and during the first year of life.

Noninvasive prenatal screening with conventional sequencing depth to screen fetal copy number variants: A retrospective study of 19 144 pregnant women

AIM

To investigate the detectability of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) with conventional sequencing depth to detect fetal copy number variants.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study in a total of 19 144 pregnant women. Their cell-free plasma DNA were assessed for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and genome-wide copy number variants by NIPS at conventional sequencing depth.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-four cases (2.0%, 374/19 144) with abnormal results were detected, which including 84 cases (0.4%, 84/19 144) with high risk of trisomy 21, 18, and 13, 90 cases (0.5%, 90/19 144) with high risk of sex chromosome abnormalities (SCA), and 44 cases (0.2%, 44/19 144) with high risk of other chromosome aneuploidies. One hundred fifty-six cases (0.8%, 156/19 144) with high risk of copy number variations (CNVs) were also detected. In following prenatal diagnosis, composite positive predictive value (PPV) of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 was 69.6% (48/69). The PPV of SCAs was 37.3% (19/51). And the PPVs for CNVs was detected as 51.0% (<5 Mb), 71.4% (5 Mb ≤ CNV ≤10 Mb), 56.5% (>10 Mb). Finally, a follow-up about the pregnancy outcomes were conducted for all available cases.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS yielded high PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 aneuploidies and moderate PPVs for SCAs and CNVs. The screening effectiveness was closely related to the size of CNV fragments. Larger CNVs, especially larger than 5 Mb, could be detected more accurately by NIPS in our analytic technique. Meanwhile, diagnostic confirmation by microarray analysis was highly recommended.

Optical genome mapping for prenatal diagnosis: A prospective study

PURPOSE

Cytogenetic analysis provides important information for prenatal decision-making and genetic counseling. Optical genome mapping (OGM) has demonstrated its performances in retrospective studies. In our prospective study, we assessed the quality of DNA obtained from cultures of amniotic fluid (AF) and chorionic villi (CV) and evaluated the ability of OGM to detect all clinically relevant aberrations identified by standard methods.

METHODS

A total of 37 prenatal samples from pregnancies with a fetal anomaly on ultrasound were analyzed prospectively by OGM between January 1, 2021 and June 31, 2022. OGM results were interpreted blindly and compared to the results obtained by standard techniques.

RESULTS

OGM results were interpretable in 92% of samples. We observed 100% concordance between OGM and karyotype and/or chromosomal microarray results. In addition, OGM identified a median of 30 small (<100 kb) structural variations per case with the involvement of 12 OMIM genes, of which 3 were OMIM morbid genes.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study showed OGM performed well in detecting genomic alterations in cell cultures from prenatal samples. The place of OGM in relation to CMA or exome sequencing remains to be defined in order to optimize the prenatal diagnostic procedure.

Postnatal genetic testing on cord blood for prenatally identified high-probability cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of postnatal genetic testing on umbilical cord blood (CB) for prenatally identified high-probability fetuses.

METHOD

CB for genetic testing was offered to individuals who met one of the following criteria: (i) fetal anomaly, (ii) positive non-invasive prenatal screening by cfDNA or biochemical analysis, or (iii) family history. Individuals with diagnostic testing, but not microarray, were also included when recommended by society guidelines. CB was collected at Brigham and Women's and Emerson Hospitals between 2016 and 2021.

RESULTS

448 individuals consented for cord blood testing (370 (82.6%) for fetal anomalies, 51 (11.4%) for high-probability cfDNA, and 27 (6.0%) for family history) and a total of 393 (87.7%) samples were analyzed. Genetic testing yielded a diagnosis in 92 (23.4%) neonates by karyotype (n = 37), chromosomal microarray (CMA) (n = 32), and other molecular analysis (n = 23). Testing averaged 10.3 days (range 1-118 days). 68 (73.9%) diagnoses potentially impacted neonatal management. MCC could not be definitively excluded in only 1.4% (6/418) of samples.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal identification of high-probability fetuses and genetic testing on CB facilitates timely genetic diagnoses and neonatal management. Testing provides reassurance and reduces a postnatal diagnostic odyssey for high-probability neonates.

The uncertainty of copy number variants: pregnancy decisions and clinical follow-up

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing for copy number variants is often used as a follow-up investigation of unusual fetal ultrasound results and is capable of detecting copy number variations with a resolution of ∼0.1 Mb. In a prenatal setting, observation and subsequent management of pregnancies with a fetal variant of uncertain significance remains problematic for counseling.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to follow the decision-making processes in pregnancies with a fetal variant of uncertain significance and prospectively assess copy number variation interpretations and implications under the newer 2020 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN

In a single prenatal unit, prospective chromosome testing using copy number variation sequencing for 8030 fetuses with unexpected noninvasive findings identified 139 pregnancies with a copy number variation classified as a variant of uncertain significance according to the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines current at the time. Parent-of-origin testing was subsequently performed to determine if the copy number variation was inherited or de novo. All couples were offered specialized genetic counseling to assist in pregnancy management decisions. For the continued pregnancies that reached term, newborns were clinically assessed for evidence of any disease at 0 to 10 months and/or at 2 to 4 years of age.

RESULTS

Of the 139 variants of uncertain significance found, most (78%) were inherited with no evidence of disease in the carrier parent. On the basis of primary ultrasound findings combined with results from noninvasive prenatal screening tests, most inherited variant of uncertain significance pregnancies were continued, whereas most pregnancies involving de novo variants of uncertain significance were terminated. From clinical follow-up of the 113 live births, only 5 showed any evidence of a phenotype that was not apparently related to the original variant of uncertain significance. Prospective reanalysis of the 139 variants of uncertain significance using recent 2020 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines changed the status of 24 variants of uncertain significance, with 15 reclassified as benign and 9 as pathogenic. However, the 5 children born with an inherited variant of uncertain significance reclassified as pathogenic showed no evidence of a disease phenotype on clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The severity of fetal ultrasound findings combined with results from parent-of-origin testing were the key drivers in pregnancy management decisions for patients. According to birth outcomes from continued pregnancies, most variants of uncertain significance proved to be apparently benign in nature and potentially of low risk of adverse disease outcome. There was a discordance rate of 17% for variant of uncertain significance scoring between the 2015 and 2020 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines for defining a variant of uncertain significance, suggesting that difficulties remain for predicting true pathogenicity. Nonetheless, with increasing knowledge of population copy number variation polymorphisms, and a more complete assessment for alternative genetic causes, patients having prenatal assessments should feel less anxious when a fetal variant of uncertain significance is identified.

[Management of isolated increased nuchal translucency: survey among the Pluridisciplinary Centers for Prenatal Diagnosis]

OBJECTIVES

The management for isolated increased nuchal translucency (NT) in the first trimester with a normal karyotype and normal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) is not consensual. The aim was to perform a survey among the Pluridisciplinary Centers for Prenatal Diagnosis (CPDPN) in France regarding their management of increased NT in the first trimester.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter descriptive survey between September 2021 and October 2021 among the 46 CPDPNs of France.

RESULTS

The response rate was 56.5% (n = 26/46). The NT thickness threshold for which invasive diagnosis testing is performed is 3.0mm in 23.1% of centers (n = 6/26) and 3.5mm in 76.9% of centers (n = 20/26). A CMA was performed alone in 26.9% of centers (n = 7/26) while 7.7% of centers (n = 2/26) did not perform a CMA. The gestational age for the first reference ultrasound scan was 16 to 18 WG in 88.5% of centers (n = 23/26), while it was not performed before 22 WG in 11.5% of centers (n = 3/26). Fetal echocardiography is proposed systematically in 73.1% of centers (n = 19/26).

CONCLUSION

There is heterogeneity in the management of increased NT in the first trimester among the CPDPNs in France. In case of increased NT on first trimester ultrasound scan, the NT thickness threshold for which invasive diagnosis testing is performed varies from 3.0 mm or 3.5mm depending on the center. Moreover, CMA and early reference morphological ultrasound scan between 16 and 18 WG were not systematically performed, despite the current data suggesting their interest.

DEGUM Recommendations on Diagnostic Puncture in Prenatal Medicine

Diagnostic puncture (amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, and fetal blood sampling) is an essential part of prenatal diagnostics and the only established and sufficiently scientifically evaluated possibility of diagnosing genetic diseases from pregnancy-specific cells. The number of diagnostic punctures in Germany, as in other countries, has fallen significantly. This is largely due to the introduction of first-trimester screening with further detailed ultrasound examination of the fetus and the analysis of cf-DNA (cell-free DNA) from maternal blood (noninvasive prenatal test - NIPT). On the other hand, knowledge about the incidence and appearance of genetic diseases has increased. The development of modern molecular genetic techniques (microarray and exome analysis) makes a differentiated investigation of these diseases increasingly possible. The requirements for education and counseling regarding these complex correlations have thus increased. The studies performed in recent years make it clear that diagnostic puncture performed in expert centers is associated with a low risk of complications. In particular, the procedure-related miscarriage risk hardly differs from the background risk for spontaneous abortion. In 2013, the Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) published recommendations on diagnostic puncture in prenatal medicine 1. The developments described above and new findings in recent years make it necessary to revise and reformulate these recommendations. The aim of this review is to compile important and current facts regarding prenatal medical puncture (including technique, complications, genetic examinations). It is intended to provide basic, comprehensive, and up-to-date information on diagnostic puncture in prenatal medicine. It replaces the publication from 2013 1.

Contribution of chromosomal microarray analysis and next-generation sequencing to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with normal karyotype

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with normal karyotype who underwent invasive testing for different indications.

METHODS

The results of invasive genetic testing performed at a tertiary center between September 2020 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for invasive tests were classified as fetal structural malformation, presence of soft markers, and high risk in screening tests. CMA results were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (pCNVs), benign (bCNVs), and variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS).

RESULTS

A total of 830 invasive tests were performed and aneuploidy was detected in 11.2% of the fetuses. CMA was performed in 465 fetuses with normal karyotype, and pCNVs were detected in 6.9%. pCNVs were detected in 8.2% of fetuses with structural malformations, 6.5% in soft markers, and 4.7% in high risk in screening tests. Pathogenic variants were detected by NGS in 33.8% of fetuses with bCNVs.

CONCLUSIONS

pCNVs can be significantly detected not only in fetuses with structural malformations, but also in invasive testing with other indications. NGS significantly contributes to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural malformations.

Prenatal diagnosis by trio exome sequencing in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: A powerful diagnostic tool

Introduction: Prenatal ultrasound (US) anomalies are detected in around 5%-10% of pregnancies. In prenatal diagnosis, exome sequencing (ES) diagnostic yield ranges from 6% to 80% depending on the inclusion criteria. We describe the first French national multicenter pilot study aiming to implement ES in prenatal diagnosis following the detection of anomalies on US. Patients and methods: We prospectively performed prenatal trio-ES in 150 fetuses with at least two US anomalies or one US anomaly known to be frequently linked to a genetic disorder. Trio-ES was only performed if the results could influence pregnancy management. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) was performed before or in parallel. Results: A causal diagnosis was identified in 52/150 fetuses (34%) with a median time to diagnosis of 28 days, which rose to 56/150 fetuses (37%) after additional investigation. Sporadic occurrences were identified in 34/56 (60%) fetuses and unfavorable vital and/or neurodevelopmental prognosis was made in 13/56 (24%) fetuses. The overall diagnostic yield was 41% (37/89) with first-line trio-ES versus 31% (19/61) after normal CMA. Trio-ES and CMA were systematically concordant for identification of pathogenic CNV. Conclusion: Trio-ES provided a substantial prenatal diagnostic yield, similar to postnatal diagnosis with a median turnaround of approximately 1 month, supporting its routine implementation during the detection of prenatal US anomalies.

Application of Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing for Structural Congenital Anomalies-Experience from a Local Prenatal Diagnostic Laboratory

Fetal structural congenital abnormalities (SCAs) complicate 2-3% of all pregnancies. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has been increasingly adopted prenatally when karyotyping and chromosomal microarray do not yield a diagnosis. This is a retrospective cohort study of 104 fetuses with SCAs identified on antenatal ultrasound in Hong Kong, where whole exome sequencing is performed. Molecular diagnosis was obtained in 25 of the 104 fetuses (24%). The highest diagnostic rate was found in fetuses with multiple SCAs (29.2%), particularly those with involvement of the cardiac and musculoskeletal systems. Variants of uncertain significance were detected in 8 out of the 104 fetuses (7.7%). Our study shows the utility of WES in the prenatal setting, and the extended use of the technology would be recommended in addition to conventional genetic workup.

Combined use of karyotyping and copy number variation sequencing technology in prenatal diagnosis

Background

Karyotyping and genome copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) are two techniques frequently used in prenatal diagnosis. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic potential of using a combination of these two methods in order to provide a more accurate clinical basis for prenatal diagnosis.

Methods

We selected 822 pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis and separated them into six groups according to different risk indicators. Karyotyping and CNV-seq were performed simultaneously to compare the diagnostic performance of the two methods.

Results

Among the different amniocentesis indicators, abnormal fetal ultrasounds accounted for 39.29% of the total number of examinees and made up the largest group. The abnormal detection rate of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) high risk was 37.93% and significantly higher than the other five groups (P < 0.05). The abnormal detection rate of mixed indicators was significantly higher than the history of the adverse reproductive outcomes group (P = 0.0151). The two methods combined found a total of 119 abnormal cases (14.48%). Karyotyping detected 57 cases (6.93%) of abnormal karyotypes, 30 numerical aberrations, and 27 structural aberrations. CNV-seq identified 99 cases (12.04%) with altered CNVs, 30 cases of chromosome aneuploidies, and 69 structural aberrations (28 pathogenic, eight that were likely pathogenic, and 33 microdeletion/duplication variants of uncertain significance (VUS)). Thirty-seven cases were found abnormal by both methods, 20 cases were detected abnormally by karyotyping (mainly mutual translocation and mostly balanced), and 62 cases of microdeletion/duplication were detected by CNV-seq. Steroid sulfatase gene (STS) deletion was identified at chromosome Xp22.31 in three cases. Postnatal follow-up confirmed that babies manifested skin abnormalities one week after birth. Six fetuses had Xp22.31 duplications ranging from 1.5 Kb to 1.7 Mb that were detected by CNV-seq. Follow-up showed that five babies presented no abnormalities during follow-up, except for one terminated pregnancy due to a history of adverse reproductive outcomes.

Conclusion

The combination of using CNV-seq and karyotyping significantly improved the detection rate of fetal pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities. CNV-seq is an effective complement to karyotyping and improves the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis.

Utility of trio-based prenatal exome sequencing incorporating splice-site and mitochondrial genome assessment in pregnancies with fetal ultrasound anomalies: prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of trio-based prenatal exome sequencing (pES), incorporating splice-site and mitochondrial genome assessment, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and normal copy-number variant sequencing (CNV-seq) results.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 90 ongoing pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies that underwent trio-based pES after receiving normal CNV-seq results, from September 2020 to November 2021, in a single center in China. By using pES with a panel encompassing exome coding and splicing regions as well as mitochondrial genome for fetuses and parents, we identified the underlying genetic causes of fetal anomalies, incidental fetal findings and parental carrier status. Information on pregnancy outcome and the impact of pES findings on parental decision-making was collected.

RESULTS

Of the 90 pregnancies included, 28 (31.1%) received a diagnostic result that could explain the fetal ultrasound anomalies. The highest diagnostic yield was noted for brain abnormalities (3/6 (50.0%)), followed by hydrops (4/9 (44.4%)) and skeletal abnormalities (13/34 (38.2%)). Collectively, 34 variants of 20 genes were detected in the 28 diagnosed cases, with 55.9% (19/34) occurring de novo. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) associated with fetal phenotypes were detected in six (6.7%) fetuses. Interestingly, fetal (n = 4) and parental (n = 3) incidental findings (IFs) were detected in seven (7.8%) cases. These included two fetuses carrying a de-novo likely pathogenic (LP) variant of the CIC and FBXO11 genes, respectively, associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, and one fetus with a LP variant in a mitochondrial gene. The remaining fetus presented with unilateral renal dysplasia and was incidentally found to carry a pathogenic PKD1 gene variant resulting in adult-onset polycystic kidney, which was later confirmed to be inherited from the mother. In addition, parental heterozygous variants associated with autosomal recessive diseases were detected in three families, including one with additional fetal diagnostic findings. Diagnostic results or fetal IFs contributed to parental decision-making about termination of the pregnancy in 26 families (26/72 (36.1%)), while negative pES results or identification of VUS encouraged 40 families (40/72 (55.6%)) to continue their pregnancy, which ended in a live birth in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Trio-based pES can provide additional genetic information for pregnancies with fetal ultrasound anomalies without a CNV-seq diagnosis. The incidental findings and parental carrier status reported by trio-based pES with splice-site and mitochondrial genome analysis extend its clinical application, but careful genetic counseling is warranted. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic nasal bone

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficiency of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in the prenatal diagnosis of foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (NB) in the first and second trimester.

METHODS

From January 2015 to April 2021, foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic NB who received invasive prenatal diagnosis were enrolled. The results of CMA were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 221 foetuses, including 166 cases with isolated absent NB and 55 cases with isolated hypoplastic NB. Twenty-four foetuses (10.9%, 24/221) had an ultrasonic diagnosis in the first trimester and 197 (89.1%, 197/221) had a ultrasonic diagnosis in the second trimester. The overall diagnostic yield of CMA was 9.0% (20/221). Aneuploidies were detected in 13 (5.9%, 13/221) foetuses, including 10 Down syndrome, 2 Klinefelter's syndrome and 1 trisomy 18. Pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in seven foetuses (3.2%, 7/221). In addition, variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected in four foetuses. The foetuses with isolated absent NB had a higher detection rate of chromosome abnormality than the isolated hypoplastic NB, but the difference was not significant in the statistical analysis (10.2% vs. 5.5%, χ² =0.642, p = .423). No significant difference was observed in the detection rate between the first trimester and the second trimester (16.6% vs. 8.1%, χ² = 1.002, p = .317, Chi-square test).

CONCLUSION

CMA can increase the diagnostic yield of chromosome abnormality, especially pathogenic CNVs for foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic NB. CMA should be recommended when isolated absent or hypoplastic NB is suspected antenatally.7.

Comparison of noninvasive prenatal screening for defined pathogenic microdeletion/microduplication syndromes and nonsyndromic copy number variations: a large multicenter study

Background: This retrospective study assessed the precision of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (MMSs) and nonsyndromic copy number variations (CNVs). Methods: The study included 19,086 singleton pregnancies screened on NIPT using high-throughput sequencing. Pregnancies with CNVs on NIPT underwent amniocentesis for karyotyping and CNV sequencing (CNV-seq). We analyzed pathogenic MMSs and nonsyndromic CNVs separately, dividing the CNVs into subgroups based on fragment size and fetal ultrasound findings. Results: A total of 170 abnormalities were detected by NIPT, of which 113 (66.5%) underwent invasive testing. The positive predictive value (PPV) of CNV-seq for all types of CNV detected by NIPT was 35.4%, with PPVs of 61.5 and 27.6% for pathogenic MMSs and nonsyndromic CNVs, respectively. PPVs for NIPT showed different values depending on gestational characteristics, with the highest PPV for NIPT in the group with increased nuchal thickness (66.7%) and for the abnormal ultrasound group (57.1%). CNVs ≤5 Mb with normal ultrasound findings were generally associated with a healthy fetus. Conclusion: NIPT can detect chromosomal aberrations in the first trimester, with high performance for MMSs. However, due to the low PPV for nonsyndromic CNVs, and the good pregnancy outcome in most cases, the introduction of expanded NIPT would cause an increase in unnecessary invasive procedures and inappropriate terminations of pregnancy.

Efficiency of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing in the detection of fetal subchromosomal microdeletion and microduplication in a cohort of 31,256 single pregnancies

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used to screen for common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. However, the ability of NIPT-Plus to detect copy number variation (CNV) is debatable. Accordingly, we assessed the efficiency of NIPT-Plus to detect clinically significant fetal CNV. We performed a prospective analysis of 31,260 singleton pregnancies, included from June 2017 to December 2020. Cell-free fetal DNA was directly sequenced using the semiconductor sequencing platform for women with high-risk CNV with clinically significant results. Fetal karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (or next-generation sequencing) are recommended for invasive diagnostic procedures. Women at low risk with no other abnormal results continued their pregnancies. We analyzed the expanded NIPT results, diagnostic test results, and follow-up information to evaluate its performance in detecting fetal CNV. Of the 31,260 pregnant women who received NIPT-Plus, 31,256 cases were tested successfully, a high risk of clinically significant CNV was detected in 221 cases (0.71%); 18 women refused further diagnosis; 203 women underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis; and 78 true positive cases and 125 false positive cases, with an overall positive predictive value (PPV) of 38.42% and a false positive rate of 0.40%. For known microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (n = 27), the PPVs were 75% DiGeorge syndrome (DGS), 80% 22q11.22 microduplication, 50% Prader-Willi syndrome, and 50% cri-du-chat. For the remaining clinically significant fetal CNVs (n = 175), the combined PPVs were 46.5% (CNVs > 10 Mb) and 28.57% (CNVs ≤ 10 Mb). NIPT-Plus screening for CNV has certain clinical value. NIPT-Plus yielded relatively high PPVs for 22q11.2 microduplication syndrome and DGS, and low to moderate PPVs for other CNVs.

Exome sequencing as first-tier test for fetuses with severe central nervous system structural anomalies

OBJECTIVE

Prenatally detected central nervous system (CNS) anomalies present a diagnostic challenge. In this study, we compared the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with a major CNS anomaly.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 114 cases referred for genetic evaluation following termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to a major CNS anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasound. All fetuses were first analyzed by CMA. All CMA-negative cases were offered ES. CMA-positive cases were reanalyzed using ES to assess its ability to detect copy-number variants (CNVs).

RESULTS

CMA identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNV in 11/114 (10%) cases. Eighty-six CMA-negative cases were analyzed using ES, which detected P/LP sequence variants in 38/86 (44%). Among recurrent cases (i.e. cases with a previously affected pregnancy), the incidence of P/LP sequence variants was non-significantly higher compared with non-recurrent ones (12/19 (63%) vs 26/67 (39%); P = 0.06). Among the 38 cases with an ES diagnosis, 20 (53%) were inherited and carried a significant risk of recurrence. Reanalysis of 10 CMA-positive cases by ES demonstrated that the bioinformatics pipeline used for sequence variant analysis also detected all P/LP CNVs, as well as three previously known non-causative CNVs.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, ES provided a high diagnostic yield (> 50%) in fetuses with severe CNS structural anomalies, which may have been partly due to the highly selected case series that included post-TOP cases from a specialist referral center. These data suggest that ES may be considered as a first-tier test for the prenatal diagnosis of major fetal CNS anomalies, detecting both P/LP sequence variants and CNVs. This is of particular importance given the time constraints of an ongoing pregnancy and the risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies (at least two major anomalies in different anatomical systems).

METHOD

This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane database, we identified studies describing ES, whole-genome and/or next-generation sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations. Included were observational studies involving five or more eligible fetuses. A fetus was eligible for inclusion if it had at least two major anomalies of different anatomical systems and a negative CMA or karyotyping result. Only positive variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic determined to be causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. The diagnostic yield of the primary outcome was calculated by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic yield of the solo approach (fetus alone sequenced) with that of the trio approach (fetus and both parents sequenced).

RESULTS

Seventeen articles with data on ES diagnostic yield, including 694 individuals with multisystem malformations, were identified. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant potentially causative of the fetal phenotype was found in 213 fetuses, giving a 33% (95% CI, 27-40%) incremental yield of ES. A stratified analysis showed similar diagnostic yields of ES using the solo approach (30%; 95% CI, 11-52%) and the trio approach (35%; 95% CI, 26-44%).

CONCLUSIONS

ES applied in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies was able to identify a potentially causative gene when CMA or karyotyping had failed to do so in an additional one-third of cases. No differences were observed between the solo and trio approaches for ES. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, where karyotype/chromosomal microarray (CMA) is normal.

Methods

Following electronic searches of four databases, we included studies with ≥10 structurally abnormal fetuses undergoing ES or whole genome sequencing. The incremental diagnostic yield of ES over CMA/karyotype was calculated and pooled in a meta‐analysis. Sub‐group analyses investigated effects of case selection and fetal phenotype on diagnostic yield.

Results

We identified 72 reports from 66 studies, representing 4350 fetuses. The pooled incremental yield of ES was 31% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26%–36%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield was significantly higher for cases pre‐selected for likelihood of monogenic aetiology compared to unselected cases (42% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield differed significantly between phenotypic sub‐groups, ranging from 53% (95% CI 42%–63%, p < 0.0001) for isolated skeletal abnormalities, to 2% (95% CI 0%–5%, p = 0.04) for isolated increased nuchal translucency.

Conclusion

Prenatal ES provides a diagnosis in an additional 31% of structurally abnormal fetuses when CMA/karyotype is non‐diagnostic. The expected diagnostic yield depends on the body system(s) affected and can be optimised by pre‐selection of cases following multi‐disciplinary review to determine that a monogenic cause is likely.

What's already known about this topic?

Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) increases genetic diagnoses in fetuses with structural abnormalities and a normal karyotype and chromosomal microarray.

Published diagnostic yields from ES are varied and may be influenced by study size, case selection and fetal phenotype.

What does this study add?

This study provides a comprehensive systematic review of the literature to date and investigates the diagnostic yield of ES for a range of isolated system anomalies, to support clinical decision‐making on how to offer prenatal ES.

Analysis of autosomal dominant genes impacted by copy number loss in 24,844 fetuses without structural abnormalities

BACKGROUND

The broad application of high-resolution chromosome detection technology in prenatal diagnosis has identified copy number loss (CNL) involving autosomal dominant (AD) genes in certain fetuses. Exon sequencing of fetuses exhibiting structural anomalies yields diagnostic information in up to 20% of cases. However, there is currently no relevant literature about the genetic origin and pregnancy outcome of CNL involving AD genes in fetuses without structural abnormalities.

RESULTS

This was a prospective study involving pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for fetal copy number variation sequencing (CNVseq). Detection of parent-of-origin was suggested in cases of samples with CNL involving AD genes and the pregnancy outcome was monitored. Amniotic fluid samples from 24,844 fetuses without structural abnormalities were successfully tested via CNVseq. The results showed that 134 fetuses (0.5%) had small CNL (< 10 Mb) containing AD genes, after excluding microdeletion and microduplication syndrome and polymorphisms. By monitoring the pregnancy outcomes of the 134 fetuses, we found that 104 (77.6%) were good, 13 (9.7%) were adverse, and 17 (12.7%) pregnant women voluntarily chose to terminate pregnancy. Of the 13 fetuses with adverse pregnancy outcomes, only 2 fetuses had phenotypes consistent with those of diseases caused by AD genes involved in CNL.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prognosis for fetuses without family history or structural abnormalities but with small CNL containing AD genes detected during pregnancy is good. The genetic origin, overlap status of established haploinsufficient gene and/or region, size of the CNL, and genetic mode may affect the pathogenicity of the CNL.

Trio exome sequencing is highly relevant in prenatal diagnostics

Objective

About 3% of newborns show malformations, with about 20% of the affected having genetic causes. Clarification of genetic diseases in postnatal diagnostics was significantly improved with high‐throughput sequencing, in particular through whole exome sequencing covering all protein‐coding regions. Here, we aim to extend the use of this technology to prenatal diagnostics.

Method

Between 07/2018 and 10/2020, 500 pregnancies with fetal ultrasound abnormalities were analyzed after genetic counseling as part of prenatal diagnostics using WES of the fetus and parents.

Results

Molecular genetic findings could explain ultrasound abnormalities in 38% of affected fetuses. In 47% of these, disease‐causing de novo variants were found. Pathogenic variants in genes with autosomal recessive or X‐linked inheritance were detected in more than one‐third (70/189 = 37%). The latter are associated with increased probability of recurrence, making their detection important for further pregnancies. Average time from sample receipt to report was 12 days in the recent cases.

Conclusion

Trio exome sequencing is a useful addition to prenatal diagnostics due to its high diagnostic yield and short processing time (comparable to chromosome analysis). It covers a wide spectrum of genetic changes. Comprehensive interdisciplinary counseling before and after diagnostics is indispensable.

What's already known about this topic?

It is known that about 20% of malformations in newborns can be associated with genetic causes.

Whole‐exome sequencing, and especially trio exome sequencing, is an established and successful method in postnatal genetic diagnostics. Diagnostic yield for trio exome sequencing is around 37%.

What does this study add?

We show that trio exome sequencing is a fast and comprehensive method in prenatal diagnostics with diagnostic yield similar to that of postnatal trio exome sequencing.

We provide case solution rates for different phenotypic observations from 19% for abnormalities of internal organs up to 52% for skeletal malformations.

High rate of abnormal findings in Prenatal Exome Trio in low risk pregnancies and apparently normal fetuses

OBJECTIVE

Data on the value of exome sequencing in fetuses with no structural anomalies are limited, especially in the early stages of pregnancy and in low risk pregnancies. We investigated the yield of targeted clinical prenatal trio exome sequencing (pES) in pregnancies with and without fetal structural anomalies.

METHODS

We performed pES in 353 pregnancies: Group 1 included 143 pregnancies with high clinical suspicion for a genetic disease: pregnancies with increased nuchal translucency, ultrasound structural defects, intrauterine growth restriction, polyhydramnios, or effusion/nuchal edema. Group 2 included 210 pregnancies with no notable abnormal fetal ultrasound findings. 2a. Low risk pregnancies with minor ultrasound findings, referred to the geneticist due to mildly increased risk for genetic disease (50); and 2b. Normal pregnancy surveillance (160).

RESULTS

Overall, 26 (7.36%) fetal analyses had pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variants. In group 1, 20/143 (13.99%) cases had P/LP variants. In group 2, 6/210 (2.86%) cases were found to have P/LP variants [5/50 in (2a) and 1/160 in (2b)].

CONCLUSION

These results show a high rate of abnormal findings on pES even in apparently normal pregnancies.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals working in prenatal diagnosis toward expanded non-invasive prenatal testing in China

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in prenatal diagnosis toward expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in China.

METHODS

We conducted a national online survey among HCPs working in prenatal diagnosis, including specialists in prenatal diagnosis and foetal medicine, obstetricians and gynaecologists, nurses in obstetrics and gynaecology, obstetric ultrasound doctors, and technicians in prenatal diagnosis laboratories. A total of 1882 questionnaires were collected, among which 1822 questionnaires met the research criteria and were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

More than 99% of all participants opted for NIPT for trisomies 21, 18, and 13. The rates of support for expanded NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, microdeletions and microduplications, and single-gene disorders were 93.9%, 88.6%, 89.4%, and 86.8%, respectively. Specialists in prenatal diagnosis and foetal medicine had greater knowledge but were less likely to support expanded NIPT compared to other participants. Knowledge increased with educational level, whereas support for expanded NIPT decreased with educational level.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 80% of HCPs working in prenatal diagnosis in China expressed support for expanding NIPT to conditions other than common trisomies. The degree of knowledge was negatively associated with the rate of support.

Implementation of fetal clinical exome sequencing: Comparing prospective and retrospective cohorts

PURPOSE

We compared the diagnostic yield of fetal clinical exome sequencing (fCES) in prospective and retrospective cohorts of pregnancies presenting with anomalies detected using ultrasound. We evaluated factors that led to a higher diagnostic efficiency, such as phenotypic category, clinical characterization, and variant analysis strategy.

METHODS

fCES was performed for 303 fetuses (183 ongoing and 120 ended pregnancies, in which chromosomal abnormalities had been excluded) using a trio/duo-based approach and a multistep variant analysis strategy.

RESULTS

fCES identified the underlying genetic cause in 13% (24/183) of prospective and 29% (35/120) of retrospective cases. In both cohorts, recessive heterozygous compound genotypes were not rare, and trio and simplex variant analysis strategies were complementary to achieve the highest possible diagnostic rate. Limited prenatal phenotypic information led to interpretation challenges. In 2 prospective cases, in-depth analysis allowed expansion of the spectrum of prenatal presentations for genetic syndromes associated with the SLC17A5 and CHAMP1 genes.

CONCLUSION

fCES is diagnostically efficient in fetuses presenting with cerebral, skeletal, urinary, or multiple anomalies. The comparison between the 2 cohorts highlights the importance of providing detailed phenotypic information for better interpretation and prenatal reporting of genetic variants.

What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing

Objective

To identify what online patient information (presented in English) is available to parents about prenatal microarray (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES), and evaluate its content, quality, and readability.

Method

Systematic searches (Google and Bing) were conducted, and websites were categorised according to their purpose. Websites categorised as patient information were included if they were: in English, directed at patients, or were a text, video, or online version of an information leaflet. Author‐developed content checklists, the DISCERN Genetics tool, and readability tests (the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Gunning Fog Index, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index) were then used to assess those sources of patient information.

Results

Of the 665 websites screened, 18 met the criteria. A further 8 sources were found through a targeted search of professional organisations, resulting in 26 sources available for further evaluation. In general, this was found to be low in quality, omitted details recommended by national or international guidance, and was written at a level too advanced for average readers.

Conclusion

Improvements should be made to the content, quality, and readability of online information so that it both reinforces and complements the discussions between parents and clinicians about testing options during pregnancy.

What's already known about this topic?

The Internet is an important source of information for parents during pregnancy

Little is known about the availability and standard of online information about newer prenatal genetic tests like chromosomal microarray (CMA) and prenatal exome sequencing (ES)

What does this study add?

Our results revealed limited online information aimed at parents about CMA and ES

The information we did identify was lacking the details recommended by professional guidelines, had low quality scores, and was written at an advanced level

Improvements to online information for parents are needed to support informed decision‐making regarding prenatal genetic tests

Prenatal Exome Sequencing in Recurrent Fetal Structural Anomalies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES), a microarray analysis was carried out of fetuses with recurrent fetal structural anomalies (with similar anomalies in consecutive pregnancies). This is a systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The selected studies describing ES in fetuses with recurrent fetal malformation were assessed using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) criteria for risk of bias. Incidence was used as the pooled effect size by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling (weighted by inverse of variance). We identified nine studies on ES diagnostic yield that included 140 fetuses with recurrent structural anomalies. A pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was found in 57 fetuses, resulting in a 40% (95%CI: 26% to 54%) incremental performance pool of ES. As expected, the vast majority (86%: 36/42) of the newly identified diseases had a recessive inheritance pattern, and among these, 42% (15/36) of variants were found in homozygosity. Meckel syndrome was the monogenic disease most frequently found, although the genes involved were diverse. The ES diagnostic yield in pregnancies with recurrent fetal structural anomalies was 40% (57/140). Homozygous disease-causing variants were found in 36% (15/57) of the newly identified monogenic disorders.

Is Prenatal Diagnosis Necessary for Fetal Isolated Nasal Bone Absence or Hypoplasia?

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal isolated nasal bone absence (INBA) or isolated nasal bone hypoplasia (INBH). We hope to provide additional relevant information for clinical counseling.

Patients and Methods

From November 1, 2018, to March 1, 2020, 55 pregnant women with isolated nasal bone dysplasia were admitted to the Changzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital. Based on the degree of abnormality, the patients were divided into two groups: INBA and INBH. CMA was performed on all patients. The clinical data and prenatal genetic diagnoses of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed. According to the requirements of WES for samples, 12 cases with negative CMA results were selected for the WES test.

Results

A total of 55 cases with INBA or INBH met the inclusion criteria. In 35INBA fetuses, there was one case of trisomy 21 and one case of 10q11.22 deletion (5.7Mb), and the abnormality rate was 5.71% (2/35). Compared with INBA fetuses, the abnormality rate was increased in the fetuses with INBH [15.00% (3/20)] (15.00% vs 5.71%); there was one case of 1q21.1 duplication (1.3Mb), one case of Xp22.31 duplication (1.67Mb), and one case of 4p deletion (7.6Mb). In a later retrospective study, two pathogenic variants were identified in two cases after the WES test; the abnormality rate was 16.67% (2/12), which involved RUNX2 and CDH4 genes, respectively.

Conclusion

A preliminary study confirmed that molecular prenatal diagnosis should be performed in fetuses with INBA or INBH. CMA followed by WES is an effective method.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in prenatal screening of fetal pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs).

Materials and Methods

We evaluated the prenatal screening capacity using traditional and retrospective approaches. For the traditional method, we evaluated 24,613 pregnant women who underwent NIPS; cases which fetal CNVs were suggested underwent prenatal diagnosis with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). For the retrospective method, we retrospectively evaluated 47 cases with fetal pathogenic CNVs by NIPS. A systematic literature search was performed to compare the evaluation efficiency.

Results

Among the 24,613 pregnant women who received NIPS, 124 (0.50%) were suspected to have fetal CNVs. Of these, 66 women underwent prenatal diagnosis with CMA and 13 had true-positive results. The positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPS for fetal CNVs was 19.7%. Among 1,161 women who did not receive NIPS and underwent prenatal diagnosis by CMA, 47 were confirmed to have fetal pathogenic CNVs. Retesting with NIPS indicated that 24 of these 47 cases could also be detected by NIPS, representing a detection rate (DR) of 51.1%. In total, 10 publications, namely, six retrospective studies and four prospective studies, met our criteria and were selected for a detailed full-text review. The reported DRs were 61.10–97.70% and the PPVs were 36.11–80.56%. The sizes of CNVs were closely related to the accuracy of NIPS detection. The DR was 41.9% (13/31) in fetuses with CNVs ≤ 3 Mb, but was 55.0% (11/20) in fetuses with CNVs > 3 Mb. Finally, to intuitively show the CNVs accurately detected by NIPS, we mapped all CNVs to chromosomes according to their location, size, and characteristics. NIPS detected fetal CNVs in 2q13 and 4q35.

Conclusion

The DR and PPV of NIPS for fetal CNVs were approximately 51.1% and 19.7%, respectively. Follow-up molecular prenatal diagnosis is recommended in cases where NIPS suggests fetal CNVs.

Benefit versus risk of chromosomal microarray analysis performed in pregnancies with normal and positive prenatal screening results: A retrospective study

Background

Most studies on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and amniocentesis risks have not evaluated pregnancies with low risk for genetic diseases; therefore, the efficacy and safety of CMA and amniocentesis in this population are unclear. This study aimed to examine the benefits and risks of prenatal genetic diagnostic tests in pregnancies having low risk for chromosomal diseases.

Methods and findings

In this retrospective study, we used clinical data from a large database of 30,830 singleton pregnancies at gestational age 16–23 weeks who underwent amniocentesis for karyotyping with or without CMA. We collected socio-demographic, medical and obstetric information, along with prenatal screening, CMA and karyotyping results. Fetal loss events were also analysed. CMA was performed in 5,837 pregnancies with normal karyotype (CMA cohort). In this cohort, 4,174 women had normal prenatal screening results and the risk for identifying genetic abnormalities with >10% risk for intellectual disability by CMA was 1:102, with no significant difference between maternal age groups. The overall post-amniocentesis fetal loss rate was 1:1,401 for the entire cohort (n = 30,830) and 1:1,945 for the CMA cohort (n = 5,837). The main limitation of this study is the relatively short follow-up of 3 weeks, which may not have been sufficient for detecting all fetal loss events.

Conclusion

The low risk for post-amniocentesis fetal loss, compared to the rate of severe genetic abnormalities detected by CMA, suggests that even pregnant women with normal prenatal screening results should consider amniocentesis with CMA.

Prenatal chromosome microarray: 'The UK experience'. A survey of reporting practices in UK genetic services (2012-2019)

BACKGROUND

The value of chromosome microarray (CMA) in the prenatal detection of significant chromosome anomalies is well-established. To guide the introduction of this technique in routine clinical practice, the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine developed national UK guidelines for reporting prenatal CMA in 2015.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the UK experience of utilising prenatal CMA.

METHOD

A 36-item survey was distributed to all UK clinical genetics services (n = 23) in March 2019 requesting information pertaining to experience since diagnostic testing commenced and current practice (March 2018 to March 2019).

RESULTS

Eighteen UK genetics services currently offer prenatal CMA. A total of 14,554 tests had been performed. A pathogenic copy number variant was identified in 7.8% of tests overall, though the diagnostic rate increased to 8.4% in the final year of the survey. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 0.7% of tests, and 'actionable' incidental findings in 0.12%.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic rate has improved over time, while reporting of VUS has decreased. Reviewing survey responses at a national level highlights variation in testing experience and practice, raising considerations both for future guideline development and implementation of other novel techniques including prenatal whole exome sequencing.

Prenatal diagnosis of 913 fetuses samples using copy number variation sequencing

Background

The present study aimed to explore the etiological relationship between fetal abnormalities and copy number variations (CNVs) with the aim of intervening and preventing the birth of children with birth defects in time.

Methods

Samples of 913 fetuses with puncture indications were collected from January 2017 to December 2019. Karyotype analysis and CNV sequencing (CNV‐seq) testing was performed for fetuses with ultrasonic abnormalities, a high risk of Down’s syndrome and an adverse birth history. All cases were followed up.

Results

In total, 123 cases (13.47%) had abnormal karyotypes, including 109 cases with chromosome number abnormalities and 14 cases of chromosomal structural abnormalities. Thirty‐seven (4.05%) cases with pathogenic CNVs were detected. The detection rate of pathogenicity CNVs was 12.82% for mixed indications, followed by 7.5% for an adverse birth history, 5.88% at high risk of non‐invasive prenatal testing, 5.00% with an abnormal ultrasonic marker, 1.89% at high risk of screening for Down's syndrome and 1.45% with advanced maternal age. There were 12 (1.31%) cases with microduplications and 25 (2.74%) cases with microdeletions. Trisomy 21 (39.02%), trisomy 18 (13.82%) and Turner syndrome (9.76%) were the top three chromosome abnormalities. There were 104, 746 and 63 cases in the 11–13 weeks, 14–27 weeks 28–38 weeks gestational ages, respectively. The abnormal rates of fetal chromosome aneuploidy and the rate of pathogenic CNVs were decreased and increased with the increase of gestational age (p < 0.05), respectively.

Conclusions

Compared with karyotype analysis, CNV‐seq can improve the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities. CNV‐seq combined karyotype analysis should be performed simultaneously in fetuses with puncture indications.

Whole Genome Sequencing in the Evaluation of Fetal Structural Anomalies: A Parallel Test with Chromosomal Microarray Plus Whole Exome Sequencing

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is a powerful tool for postnatal genetic diagnosis, but relevant clinical studies in the field of prenatal diagnosis are limited. The present study aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of WGS compared with chromosomal microarray (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. We performed trio WGS (≈40-fold) in parallel with CMA in 111 fetuses with structural or growth anomalies, and sequentially performed WES when CMA was negative (CMA plus WES). In comparison, WGS not only detected all pathogenic genetic variants in 22 diagnosed cases identified by CMA plus WES, yielding a diagnostic rate of 19.8% (22/110), but also provided additional and clinically significant information, including a case of balanced translocations and a case of intrauterine infection, which might not be detectable by CMA or WES. WGS also required less DNA (100 ng) as input and could provide a rapid turnaround time (TAT, 18 ± 6 days) compared with that (31 ± 8 days) of the CMA plus WES. Our results showed that WGS provided more comprehensive and precise genetic information with a rapid TAT and less DNA required than CMA plus WES, which enables it as an alternative prenatal diagnosis test for fetal structural anomalies.

The role of next-generation sequencing in the investigation of ultrasound-identified fetal structural anomalies

Fetal structural anomalies have an impact on fetal mortality and morbidity. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may be incorporated into clinical pathways for investigation of paediatric morbidity but can also be used to delineate the prognosis of fetal anomalies. This paper reviews the role of NGS in the investigation of fetal malformations, the literature defining the clinical utility, the technique most commonly used and potential promise and challenges for implementation into clinical practice. Prospective case selection with informative pre-test counselling by multidisciplinary teams is imperative. Regulated laboratory sequencing, bioinformatic pathways with potential variant identification and conservative matching with the phenotype is important. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Prenatal exome sequencing in fetal structural anomalies yields diagnostic information in up to 20% of cases.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening and Diagnostic Testing from Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine: (2) Invasive Diagnostic Testing for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities

The Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine proposed the first Korean guideline on prenatal aneuploidy screening and diagnostic testing, in April 2019. The clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed for Korean women using an adaptation process based on good-quality practice guidelines, previously developed in other countries, on prenatal screening and invasive diagnostic testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities. We reviewed current guidelines and developed a Korean CPG on invasive diagnostic testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities according to the adaptation process. Recommendations for selected 11 key questions are: 1) Considering the increased risk of fetal loss in invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal genetic disorders, it is not recommended for all pregnant women aged over 35 years. 2) Because early amniocentesis performed before 14 weeks of pregnancy increases the risk of fetal loss and malformation, chorionic villus sampling (CVS) is recommended for pregnant women who will undergo invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal genetic disorders in the first trimester of pregnancy. However, CVS before 9 weeks of pregnancy also increases the risk of fetal loss and deformity. Thus, CVS is recommended after 9 weeks of pregnancy. 3) Amniocentesis is recommended to distinguish true fetal mosaicism from confined placental mosaicism. 4) Anti-immunoglobulin should be administered within 72 hours after the invasive diagnostic testing. 5) Since there is a high risk of vertical transmission, an invasive prenatal diagnostic testing is recommended according to the clinician's discretion with consideration of the condition of the pregnant woman. 6) The use of antibiotics is not recommended before or after an invasive diagnostic testing. 7) The chromosomal microarray test as an alternative to the conventional cytogenetic test is not recommended for all pregnant women who will undergo an invasive diagnostic testing. 8) Amniocentesis before 14 weeks of gestation is not recommended because it increases the risk of fetal loss and malformation. 9) CVS before 9 weeks of gestation is not recommended because it increases the risk of fetal loss and malformation. 10) Although the risk of fetal loss associated with invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (amniocentesis and CVS) may vary based on the proficiency of the operator, the risk of fetal loss due to invasive prenatal diagnostic testing is higher in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies. 11) When a monochorionic twin is identified in early pregnancy and the growth and structure of both fetuses are consistent, an invasive prenatal diagnostic testing can be performed on one fetus alone. However, an invasive prenatal diagnostic testing is recommended for each fetus in cases of pregnancy conceived via in vitro fertilization, or in cases in which the growth of both fetuses differs, or in those in which at least one fetus has a structural abnormality. The guidelines were established and approved by the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. This guideline is revised and presented every 5 years.

Associated Chromosomal Abnormalities in Fetuses Diagnosed Prenatally with Right Aortic Arch

Right aortic arch (RAA) is an abnormal embryologic development of the aorta characterized by its descendance on the right side of the trachea. This anomaly is accompanied often by other intracardiac and extracardiac anomalies and it is also known for potential association with genetic aberrations, most common being 22q11.2 deletion. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of chromosomal anomalies and in particular 22q11.2 deletion in RAA. Moreover, we assessed the prognosis of fetuses with isolated RAA. Our second objective was to evaluate the prevalence of hypoplastic or absent thymus in RAA fetuses diagnosed with 22q11.2 deletion. We conducted a retrospective study of all fetuses with RAA over a period of 10 years diagnosed prenatally in a tertiary referral center in Romania. A detailed ultrasound was obtained in each case. We extracted the cases that were investigated genetically and selected the cases positive for 22q11.2 deletion. These fetuses were followed up until pregnancy termination or birth to confirm the ultrasound findings. Deletion 22q11.2 was present in 23.52% (4/17) cases. The incidence was particularly high when the fetuses presented a small thymus. In conclusion, we believe that all cases of RAA, including when isolated, should be referred for genetic testing and especially 22q11.2 deletion exclusion. Also, we suggest considering hypoplastic thymus to be a soft marker for this deletion.

Application of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis

Background

To explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis.

Methods

The results of chromosome karyotype analysis and CMA of 477 cases undergoing amniocentesis were analyzed. The results of the no ultrasound abnormality group and the ultrasound abnormality group were compared separately. Within the ultrasound abnormality group, the results of the ultrasound structural malformation group, the ultrasound soft index abnormality group, and other ultrasound abnormality (including abnormal amniotic fluid volume and fetal growth restriction) groups were compared.

Results

Abnormal chromosome and CMA results were found in a total of 71 cases (15.88%, 71/447), which can be broken down into a total of 23 karyotype abnormalities (5.15%, 23/447), consisting of 18 cases of aneuploidy (4.03%, 18/447), 2 cases of unbalanced chromosome rearrangements (0.44%, 2/447), and 3 cases of chimerism (0.67%, 3/447); 17 cases with detection of pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) (3.80%, 17/447); and 31 cases of detection of clinical variants of unknown significance (VOUS) (6.93%, 31/447). CMA detected 3.8% more genetic abnormalities than karyotype analysis (in addition to the abnormalities detected simultaneously by karyotype analysis). Between the no ultrasound abnormality group and the ultrasound abnormality group, there was an extremely significant difference in the detection rate of an abnormal chromosomal karyotype (P < 0.01) and of VOUS (P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the detection rate of pCNV (P > 0.05). Comparing the ultrasound structural malformation group, the ultrasound soft index abnormality group, and the other ultrasound abnormality group, there were no significant differences in the detection rate of abnormal chromosomal karyotypes (P > 0.05), pCNV (P > 0.05) or VOUS (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The detection rate of chromosomal karyotype abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis in cases with no ultrasound abnormalities was higher. For cases with fetal ultrasound structural abnormalities, when compared with traditional karyotype analysis, CMA can improve the detection rate of fetal genetic abnormalities. However, the no ultrasound abnormality group also had a high VOUS abnormality detection rate, so it is necessary to strictly define the CMA indications.

Clinical Utility of SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 5000 Pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) has been introduced for prenatal diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the clinical value of SNP-array in the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal anomalies.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 5000 cases tested by SNP-array, and the results of 4022 cases analyzed by both karyotyping and SNP-array were compared.

RESULTS

SNP-array analysis of 5000 samples revealed that the overall abnormality detection rate by SNP-array was 12.3%, and the overall detection rate of clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs) by SNP-array was 2.6%. SNP-array identified clinically significant submicroscopic CNVs in 4.5% fetuses with anomaly on ultrasonography, in 1.6% of fetuses with advanced maternal age (AMA), in 2.5% of fetuses with abnormal result on maternal serum screening, in 2.9% of fetuses with abnormal non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results and in 3.0% of fetuses with other indications. Of the 4022 samples analyzed by both karyotyping and SNP-array, SNP-array could identify all the aneuploidy and triploidy detected by karyotyping but did not identify balanced structural chromosomal abnormalities and low-level mosaicism detected by karyotyping.

CONCLUSION

SNP-array could additionally identify clinically significant submicroscopic CNVs, and we recommend the combination of SNP-array analysis and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis.

Is it useful to evaluate the presence of aberrant right subclavian artery in prenatal diagnosis ultrasounds?

AIM

Analyze if the evaluation of aberrant right subclavian artery in the prenatal echography has improved the detection of chromosomal, genetic and/or morphological abnormalities in our population.

METHODS

Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study of the cases of aberrant right subclavian artery diagnosed in our Prenatal Diagnosis Unit between January of 2011 and December of 2018.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-seven cases of aberrant right subclavian artery were diagnosed and among them, 179 were considered isolated cases and thus were confirmed after birth. The detection of aberrant right subclavian artery did not improve itself neither the diagnosis of trisomy 21 in the second trimester of pregnancy nor other chromosomal or genetic abnormalities, including the not isolated cases. There were two cases of trisomy 21 diagnosed in the second trimester that presented major sonographic disorders and an inadequate examination during the first trimester. When aberrant right subclavian artery was associated with soft markers of aneuploidy in the second trimester, any case was a trisomy 21. Aberrant right subclavian artery seems to be associated with some minor and major heart defects, especially ventriculoseptal defect and aneurismatic ductus, and in some cases, also with clubfeet.

CONCLUSION

When an adequate screening of aneuploidies and a thorough ultrasound have been performed during the first trimester, aberrant right subclavian artery hardly helps to perform other diagnosis in the second trimester.

Prenatal diagnosis of BACs-on-Beads assay in 1520 cases from Fujian Province, China

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of BACs‐on‐Beads (BoBs™) assay for rapid detection of chromosomal abnormalities for prenatal diagnosis (PND).

Methods

A total of 1520 samples, including seven chorionic villi biopsy samples, 1328 amniotic fluid samples, and 185 umbilical cord samples from pregnant women were collected to detect the chromosomal abnormalities using BoBs™ assay and karyotyping. Furthermore, abnormal specimens were verified by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Results

The results demonstrated that the success rate of karyotyping and BoBs™ assay in PND was 98.09% and 100%, respectively. BoBs™ assay was concordant with karyotyping for Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, and Trisomy 13, sex chromosomal aneuploidy, Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome, and mosaicism. BoBs™ assay also detected Smith–Magenis syndrome, Williams–Beuren syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, Miller–Dieker syndrome, Prader–Willi syndrome, Xp22.31 microdeletions, 22q11.2, and 17p11.2 microduplications. However, karyotyping failed to show these chromosomal abnormalities. A case of 8q21.2q23.3 duplication which was found by karyotyping was not detected by BoBs™ assay. Furthermore, all these chromosomal abnormalities were consistent with CMA and FISH verifications. According to the reports, we estimated that the detection rates of karyotyping, BoBs™, and CMA in the present study were 4.28%, 4.93%, and 5%, respectively, which is consistent with the results of a previous study. The respective costs for the three methods were about $135–145, $270–290, and $540–580.

Conclusion

BoBs™ assay is considered a reliable, rapid test for use in PND. A variety of comprehensive technological applications can complement each other in PND, in order to maximize the diagnosis rate and reduce the occurrence of birth defects.

Fetal Exome Sequencing on the Horizon

Prenatal whole exome sequencing has recently been introduced. It is evolving and although not currently ready for everyday clinical practice, it will likely become part of the diagnostic arsenal available to clinicians caring for couples carrying a pregnancy for which fetal anomalies have been identified. This commentary discusses what it is, its indications, its benefits, and its limitations.

Prenatal diagnosis of familial submicroscopic duplication at 18q22.3 without phenotypic abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of familial submicroscopic duplication at 18q22.3 without phenotypic abnormalities.

CASE REPORT

Here, we reported two different cases with novel copy number variation at chromosome 18q22.3: one carried a maternally inherited 2.36 Mb microduplication, and the other carried a patrilineally inherited 1.74 Mb microduplication. The HumanCytoSNP-12 array allows for the visualization of the CNVs and maps the breakpoints. Both parents with the microduplication at 18q22.3 as well as their foetuses had normal phenotypes; the infants were regularly followed up after one year of age, and no abnormalities were found, including abnormalities related to growth, intelligence and sexual development.

CONCLUSION

Our report showed that the duplication of 18q22.3 (chr18:68,606,012-71,287,101) might represent a benign variant.

Detection of copy number variants with chromosomal microarray in 10 377 pregnancies at a single laboratory

Introduction

Invasive prenatal testing with chromosomal microarray analysis may be a relevant option for all pregnant women, but there is only moderate‐quality evidence for such an offer. We intended to study the prevalence of copy number variants (CNVs) in prenatal samples using a single SNP‐array platform stratified by indication.

Material and methods

A cross‐sectional study was performed based on a cohort. From January 2015 to December 2017, a total of 10 377 prenatal samples were received for prenatal single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)‐array in the laboratory of the Genetics Generation Advancement Corporation. Indications for chromosomal microarray analysis studies included the confirmation of an abnormal karyotype, ultrasound abnormalities, advanced maternal age and parental anxiety. CNVs and region of homozygosity identified by the SNP‐array were analyzed.

Results

Of 10 377 cases, 689 had ultrasound abnormalities and 9688 were ascertained to have other indications. The overall prevalence of CNVs was 2.1% (n = 223/10 377, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9‐2.4), but the prevalence was 4.4% (95% CI 3.0‐6.1) for cases referred with abnormal ultrasound findings and 2.0% (95% CI 1.7‐2.3) for other indications. Of the 223 CNVs detected, 42/10 377 were pathogenic (0.4%, 95% CI 0.3‐0.6), 84 were susceptibility CNV (0.8%, 95% CI 0.6‐1.0) and 97 were variants of uncertain significance (0.9%, 95% CI 0.8‐1.1). Using an SNP‐based platform allowed for the detection of paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 in a fetus with ultrasound abnormality.

Conclusions

With an indication of advanced maternal age but normal ultrasound scans, the prevalence of pathogenic CNVs was 0.4% and that of susceptibility CNV 0.7%. As CNVs are independent of maternal age, the prevalence is likely the same for younger women. Thus, this study provides further evidence that chromosomal microarray analysis should be available for all women who wish to receive diagnostic testing, as this risk is above the cut‐off of 1:300 for Down syndrome, leading to the suggestion of invasive testing. A chromosomal microarray analysis based on SNP‐array platform is preferable, as it can also detect uniparental disomy in addition to copy number variants.

Rapid whole exome sequencing in pregnancies to identify the underlying genetic cause in fetuses with congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound imaging

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of trio‐based rapid whole exome sequencing (rWES) in pregnancies of fetuses with a wide range of congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound imaging.

Methods

In this observational study, we analyzed the first 54 cases referred to our laboratory for prenatal rWES to support clinical decision making, after the sonographic detection of fetal congenital anomalies. The most common identified congenital anomalies were skeletal dysplasia (n = 20), multiple major fetal congenital anomalies (n = 17) and intracerebral structural anomalies (n = 7).

Results

A conclusive diagnosis was identified in 18 of the 54 cases (33%). Pathogenic variants were detected most often in fetuses with skeletal dysplasia (n = 11) followed by fetuses with multiple major fetal congenital anomalies (n = 4) and intracerebral structural anomalies (n = 3). A survey, completed by the physicians for 37 of 54 cases, indicated that the rWES results impacted clinical decision making in 68% of cases.

Conclusions

These results suggest that rWES improves prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with congenital anomalies, and has an important impact on prenatal and peripartum parental and clinical decision making.

Chromosomal abnormalities detected by karyotyping and microarray analysis in twins with structural anomalies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence and types of chromosomal abnormalities detected in twins with structural anomalies and compare their distribution according to chorionicity and amnionicity and by structural-anomaly type. The added value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping in twins was also estimated.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of 534 twin pregnancies seen over an 11-year period, in which one or both fetuses were diagnosed with congenital structural anomalies on ultrasound. The ultrasound findings and invasive prenatal diagnostic results were reviewed. Twin pregnancies were categorized as monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA), monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) or dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA). Chromosomal abnormalities detected by G-banding karyotyping and/or CMA were analyzed by chorionicity and amnionicity and by structural-anomaly type.

RESULTS

The 534 twin pairs analyzed comprised 25 pairs of MCMA, 112 pairs of MCDA and 397 pairs of DCDA twins. Of the 549 fetuses affected by structural anomalies, 432 (78.7%) underwent invasive prenatal testing and cytogenetic results were obtained. The incidence of overall chromosomal abnormalities in the DCDA fetuses (25.4%) was higher than that in the MCMA (3.7%) and MCDA (15.3%) fetuses. The incidence of aneuploidy was significantly higher in the DCDA group (22.8%) than in the MCMA (0.0%) and MCDA (12.4%) groups. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities detected in fetuses, with anomalies of the cardiovascular, faciocervical, musculoskeletal, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems, was higher in the DCDA group than in the MCDA group. In both the DCDA and MCDA groups, hydrops fetalis was associated with the highest incidence of chromosomal abnormality; of these fetuses, 67.6% had Turner syndrome (45,X). Pathogenic copy-number variations (CNVs) undetectable by karyotyping were identified by CMA in five (2.0%; 95% CI, 0.3-3.7%) DCDA fetuses. No pathogenic CNVs were found in MCMA and MCDA twins.

CONCLUSIONS

Dichorionic twins with structural anomalies have a higher risk of chromosomal abnormalities, especially aneuploidies, than do monochorionic twins. The incremental diagnostic yield of CMA over karyotyping seems to be lower (2.0%) in twins than that reported in singleton pregnancy. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Chromosomal microarray analysis for pregnancies with or without ultrasound abnormalities in women of advanced maternal age

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been suggested to be routinely conducted for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities (UA), especially with ultrasound structural anomalies (USA). Whether to routinely offer CMA to women of advanced maternal age (AMA) without UA when undergoing invasive prenatal testing is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of CMA in detecting clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses, with or without UA, of women with AMA.

METHODS

Data from singleton pregnancies referred for prenatal CMA due to AMA, with or without UA were obtained. The enrolled cases were divided into AMA group (group A) and AMA accompanied by UA group (group B). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology and conventional karyotyping were performed simultaneously.

RESULTS

A total of 703 cases were enrolled and divided into group A (N = 437) and group B (N = 266). Clinically significant abnormalities were detected by CMA in 52 cases (7.4%, 52/703; the value in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (3.9% vs 13.2%, P < .05); no statistic difference was observed with respect to submicroscopic variants of clinical significance between the two groups (0.9% vs 2.6%, P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Chromosomal microarray analysis should be available to all women with AMA undergoing invasive prenatal testing, regardless of ultrasound findings.

Prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variants in fetuses with ventriculomegaly

OBJECTIVES

To systematically investigate chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variants (CNVs) in fetuses with different types of ventriculomegaly (VM) by karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 312 fetuses diagnosed with VM. Amniotic fluid and umbilical blood samples were collected by amniocentesis and cordocentesis, respectively, and subjected to karyotyping and/or CMA. Subgroup analysis by VM type, including mild VM (MVM) and severe VM (SVM), unilateral and bilateral VM, isolated VM (IVM), and non-isolated VM (NIVM), was performed.

RESULTS

The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 12.1% (34/281) by karyotyping and 20.6% when CMA was additionally performed (P < 0.05). Abnormalities were identified by CMA in 17.4% (38/218) of fetuses and pathogenic CNVs in 5.0% (11/218). Notably, CMA detected CNVs in 10.6% (23/218) of fetuses with normal karyotypes. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities by karyotyping was higher in bilateral than in unilateral VM (20.5% versus 6.5%), whereas the incidence detected by CMA was higher in NIVM than in IVM (21.4% versus 10.3%; both P < 0.05). In NIVM, CMA provided an additional detection rate of 11.4% (16/140) and a detection rate of 10.0% for pathogenic CNVs and aneuploidies. Central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities were the most common other ultrasonic abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

CMA is highly recommended for prenatal diagnosis of fetal VM together with karyotyping, especially in fetuses with bilateral VM and NIVM with abnormal CNS findings. Further study is necessary to explore the relationships between genotypes and phenotypes to facilitate prenatal diagnosis of fetal VM.