Exome sequencing positively identified relevant alterations in more than half of cases with an indication of prenatal ultrasound anomalies

Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing

Prenatal diagnoses of congenital malformations have increased significantly in recent years with use of high-resolution prenatal imaging. Despite more precise radiological diagnoses, discussions with expectant parents remain challenging because congenital malformations are associated with a wide spectrum of outcomes. Comprehensive prenatal genetic testing has become an essential tool that improves the accuracy of prognostication. Testing strategies include chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing. The diagnostic yield varies depending on the specific malformations, severity of the abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement. The utility of prenatal genetic diagnosis includes increased diagnostic clarity for clinicians and families, informed pregnancy decision-making, neonatal care planning, and reproductive planning. Turnaround time for results of comprehensive genetic testing remains a barrier, especially for parents that are decision-making, although this has improved over time. Uncertainty inherent to many genetic testing results is a challenge. Appropriate genetic counseling is essential for parents to understand the diagnosis and prognosis and to make informed decisions. Recent research has investigated the yield of exome or genome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses, both with non-invasive screening methods and invasive diagnostic testing; the prenatal diagnostic community must evaluate and analyze the significant ethical considerations associated with this practice prior to generalizing its use. IMPACT: Reviews available genetic testing options during the prenatal period in detail. Discusses the impact of prenatal genetic testing on care using case-based examples. Consolidates the current literature on the yield of genetic testing for prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations.

Importance and application of WES in fetal genetic diagnostics: Identification of novel ASPM mutation in a fetus with microcephaly

Background

Prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) approaches can provide genetic diagnosis with rapid turnaround time and high diagnostic rate when conventional tests are negative. Here we report a family with multiple pregnancy loss and with repeated occurrence of fetal microcephaly.

Methods and results

Because of positive family history and recurrent structural abnormality during the pregnancies that may lead postnatal neurodevelopmental consequences, WES analysis was indicated. Umbilical cord blood sampling was carried out and WES was performed using Twist Human Core Exome Kit and Illumina sequencing technology. The presence of pathogenic variants was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. WES analysis revealed a known pathogenic c.8506_8507delCA (p.Gln2836Glufs*35, rs587783280) and a novel pathogenic c.3134_3135delTC (p.Leu1045Glnfs*17) ASPM mutations in the fetus in compound heterozygous state. The c.3134_3135delTC has never been reported in the literature.

Conclusions

Our findings serve additional evidence that WES can be an efficient and relevant tool to diagnose certain genetic disorders with appropriate indication and to assess the recurrence risk of a disease. With the application of WES in combination with pre-implantation genetic tests, we can avoid the transmission of pathogenic mutations and we can achieve a decreased abortion rate in obstetric care.

Severe neuromuscular forms of glycogen storage disease type IV: Histological, clinical, biochemical, and molecular findings in a large French case series

Glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV), also called Andersen disease, or amylopectinosis, is a highly heterogeneous autosomal recessive disorder caused by a glycogen branching enzyme (GBE, 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme) deficiency secondary to pathogenic variants on GBE1 gene. The incidence is evaluated to 1:600 000 to 1:800 000 of live births. GBE deficiency leads to an excessive deposition of structurally abnormal, amylopectin-like glycogen in affected tissues (liver, skeletal muscle, heart, nervous system, etc.). Diagnosis is often guided by histological findings and confirmed by GBE activity deficiency and molecular studies. Severe neuromuscular forms of GSD IV are very rare and of disastrous prognosis. Identification and characterization of these forms are important for genetic counseling for further pregnancies. Here we describe clinical, histological, enzymatic, and molecular findings of 10 cases from 8 families, the largest case series reported so far, of severe neuromuscular forms of GSD IV along with a literature review. Main antenatal features are: fetal akinesia deformation sequence or arthrogryposis/joint contractures often associated with muscle atrophy, decreased fetal movement, cystic hygroma, and/or hydrops fetalis. If pregnancy is carried to term, the main clinical features observed at birth are severe hypotonia and/or muscle atrophy, with the need for mechanical ventilation, cardiomyopathy, retrognathism, and arthrogryposis. All our patients were stillborn or died within 1 month of life. In addition, we identified five novel GBE1 variants.

Genetic analysis, ultrasound phenotype, and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with Xp22.33 or Yp11.32 microdeletions

OBJECTIVES

The phenotypes of Xp22.33 or Yp11.32 microdeletions comprising the short-stature homeobox (SHOX) gene have been extensively described in adults and children. Herein, the prenatal ultrasound phenotype and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions were analyzed to improve our understanding, diagnosis, and monitoring of this genetic condition in the fetal stage.

METHODS

A total of 9,100 pregnant women referred to tertiary units for prenatal diagnosis were evaluated by chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA).

RESULTS

Seven (0.08 %) fetuses had Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions, ranging from 243 kb to 1.1 Mb, that comprised SHOX. The ultrasonic phenotypes differed among these fetuses, with three fetuses presenting abnormal bone development, one had labial-palatal deformity and strawberry head, two had an abnormal ultrasonic soft marker, and one had no abnormalities. After genetic counseling, only one couple underwent pedigree assessment, which confirmed the paternal origin of the microdeletion. This infant presented delayed speech development, whereas other three infants showed a typical postnatal development. In three cases, the parents chose to terminate the pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasonic phenotype of fetuses with Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions resulting in SHOX heterozygosity loss is variable. Prenatal CMA can quickly and effectively diagnose Xp22.33/Yp11.32 microdeletions and SHOX loss, which may help prenatal counseling.

The Landscape of Point Mutations in Human Protein Coding Genes Leading to Pregnancy Loss

Pregnancy loss is the most frequent complication of a pregnancy which is devastating for affected families and poses a significant challenge for the health care system. Genetic factors are known to play an important role in the etiology of pregnancy loss; however, despite advances in diagnostics, the causes remain unexplained in more than 30% of cases. In this review, we aggregated the results of the decade-long studies into the genetic risk factors of pregnancy loss (including miscarriage, termination for fetal abnormality, and recurrent pregnancy loss) in euploid pregnancies, focusing on the spectrum of point mutations associated with these conditions. We reviewed the evolution of molecular genetics methods used for the genetic research into causes of pregnancy loss, and collected information about 270 individual genetic variants in 196 unique genes reported as genetic cause of pregnancy loss. Among these, variants in 18 genes have been reported by multiple studies, and two or more variants were reported as causing pregnancy loss for 57 genes. Further analysis of the properties of all known pregnancy loss genes showed that they correspond to broadly expressed, highly evolutionary conserved genes involved in crucial cell differentiation and developmental processes and related signaling pathways. Given the features of known genes, we made an effort to construct a list of candidate genes, variants in which may be expected to contribute to pregnancy loss. We believe that our results may be useful for prediction of pregnancy loss risk in couples, as well as for further investigation and revealing genetic etiology of pregnancy loss.

Identification of genetic alterations in couples and their products of conceptions from recurrent pregnancy loss in North Indian population

Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is one of the most common pregnancy-related complications, which can be stressful and emotionally draining for a couple. Genetic alterations, which are responsible for RPL, can be present in either of the three genomes: mother, father, or their fetuses. In addition, environmental factors interacting with these three genomes can affect germline cells. With this aim, the present study was conducted to understand the underlying etiology of RPL using Next-generation sequencing (NGS; couple exome and TRIO exomes) in combination with cytogenetic tests [karyotyping and chromosomal microarray (CMA)]. Material & Methods: In present study we recruited 61 couples with RPL (history of ≥ 2 abortions) and 31 products of conceptions (POCs). For all couples karyotyping was done at the time of recruitment, followed by collection of POC samples and parental blood samples. Before processing POC samples for CMA, they were checked for maternal cell contamination (MCC) by QF-PCR. In POC samples with no pathogenic variant, TRIO exome sequencing was done. Further, in case of unavailability of POC sample, couple exome sequencing was done for RPL couples. Results: In six individuals out of 61 couples (5%), abnormality in karyotypes was detected. Among 116 normal karyotypes, there were 11 heteromorphisms (9.5%), for which the couples had to be counselled and reassured. Out of the 31 POCs, 10 were excluded because of MCC (around 30%) and one had major aneuploidy. CMA in POCs identified pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) in 25% of cases (5/20) and variant of unknown significance (VUS) in 20% of cases (4/20). Autosomal trisomy was the most frequent chromosomal abnormality diagnosed. NGS was performed to establish single-gene causes of RPL. Couple exome sequencing was performed in 20 couples, and 14 were found to be carriers for autosomal recessive conditions. A total of 50 potential disease-causing variants in 40 genes were identified in 33 of 40 individuals (82.5%). Putative causative variants were identified in 37.5% of the TRIO cases (3/8). Mutations in few important genes (SRP54, ERBB4, NEB, ALMS, ALAD, MTHFR, F5, and APOE), which are involved in vital pathways, early embryonic development, and fetal demise, were identified in the POCs. Conclusion: It enhances our understanding of prenatal phenotypes of many Mendelian disorders. These mutated genes may play an auxiliary role in the development of treatment strategies for RPL. There was no correlation of the number of abortions with etiological yield of any technique to detect the cause of RPL. This study shows the utilization of combination of techniques in improving our understanding of the cause of early embryonic lethality in humans.

Whole-exome sequencing in deceased fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is an effective method in the prenatal setting for identification of the underlying genetic etiology of fetal ultrasound abnormalities. To investigate the diagnostic value of WES in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities that resulted in fetal demise or pregnancy termination.

METHODS

61 deceased fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and normal copy number variation Sequencing were retrospectively collected. Proband-only or trio-WES were performed on the products of conception.

RESULT

Collectively, 28 cases were positive with 39 variants (10 pathogenic, 22 likely pathogenic and 7 variants of uncertain significance) of 18 genes, and the overall diagnostic rate was 45.9% (28/61), of which 39.2% (11/28) were de novo variants. In addition, 21 variants in 11 genes among the positive cases had not been previously reported. The diagnostic yield for definitive findings for trio analysis was 55.9% (19/34) compared to 33.3% (9/27) for singletons. The most common ultrasound abnormalities were skeletal system abnormalities 39.2% (11/28), followed by multiple system abnormalities (17.9%, 5/28) and genitourinary abnormalities (17.9%, 5/28).

CONCLUSION

Our results support the use of WES to identify genetic etiologies of ultrasound abnormalities and improve understanding of pathogenic variants. The identification of disease-related variants provided information for subsequent genetic counseling of recurrence risk and management of subsequent pregnancies.

Genomic autopsy to identify underlying causes of pregnancy loss and perinatal death

Pregnancy loss and perinatal death are devastating events for families. We assessed 'genomic autopsy' as an adjunct to standard autopsy for 200 families who had experienced fetal or newborn death, providing a definitive or candidate genetic diagnosis in 105 families. Our cohort provides evidence of severe atypical in utero presentations of known genetic disorders and identifies novel phenotypes and disease genes. Inheritance of 42% of definitive diagnoses were either autosomal recessive (30.8%), X-linked recessive (3.8%) or autosomal dominant (excluding de novos, 7.7%), with risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. We report that at least ten families (5%) used their diagnosis for preimplantation (5) or prenatal diagnosis (5) of 12 pregnancies. We emphasize the clinical importance of genomic investigations of pregnancy loss and perinatal death, with short turnaround times for diagnostic reporting and followed by systematic research follow-up investigations. This approach has the potential to enable accurate counseling for future pregnancies.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies (at least two major anomalies in different anatomical systems).

METHOD

This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane database, we identified studies describing ES, whole-genome and/or next-generation sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations. Included were observational studies involving five or more eligible fetuses. A fetus was eligible for inclusion if it had at least two major anomalies of different anatomical systems and a negative CMA or karyotyping result. Only positive variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic determined to be causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. The diagnostic yield of the primary outcome was calculated by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic yield of the solo approach (fetus alone sequenced) with that of the trio approach (fetus and both parents sequenced).

RESULTS

Seventeen articles with data on ES diagnostic yield, including 694 individuals with multisystem malformations, were identified. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant potentially causative of the fetal phenotype was found in 213 fetuses, giving a 33% (95% CI, 27-40%) incremental yield of ES. A stratified analysis showed similar diagnostic yields of ES using the solo approach (30%; 95% CI, 11-52%) and the trio approach (35%; 95% CI, 26-44%).

CONCLUSIONS

ES applied in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies was able to identify a potentially causative gene when CMA or karyotyping had failed to do so in an additional one-third of cases. No differences were observed between the solo and trio approaches for ES. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio-exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosis

PURPOSE

To understand motivations for and parental interpretation of results from trio-exome sequencing (ES) for fetal anomalies with a negative standard genetic diagnosis.

METHODS

Analysis of an ongoing, prospective prenatal trio-ES study of pregnancies with ultrasound-identified congenital anomalies and lack of a standard genetic diagnosis. After determination of pregnancy disposition, participants completed questionnaires and a semi-structured interview pre- and post-sequencing. Interviews were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology to identify themes. Associations between themes and ES result were also examined.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six trios have been sequenced. Of those, 45 (36%) resulted in fetal diagnosis. One hundred twenty-five women completed pre-sequencing surveys, and 91 women completed post-sequencing surveys. The main themes identified include (1) variable reasons to pursue ES, (2) limited expectations but high hopes from ES, (3) parental adaptation to uncertain results, (4) impact on personal health and reproduction, and (5) gratitude for the process.

CONCLUSION

Participants pursued ES for various reasons, most often to identify a diagnosis and guide reproduction. Post-sequencing, most participants described the process, their interpretation of results, and the impact of receiving the results. Less frequently, but of most concern, participants expressed anxiety about testing and implications for themselves, relationships, and other family members, thus identifying an area of high need for additional support among patients undergoing prenatal ES.

Singleton exome sequencing of 90 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies revealing novel disease-causing variants and genotype-phenotype correlations

Exome sequencing has been increasingly implemented in prenatal genetic testing for fetuses with morphological abnormalities but normal rapid aneuploidy detection and microarray analysis. We present a retrospective study of 90 fetuses with different abnormal ultrasound findings, in which we employed the singleton exome sequencing (sES; 75 fetuses) or to a lesser extent (15 fetuses) a multigene panel analysis of 6713 genes as a primary tool for the detection of monogenic diseases. The detection rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in this study was 34.4%. The highest diagnostic rate of 56% was in fetuses with multiple anomalies, followed by cases with skeletal or renal abnormalities (diagnostic rate of 50%, respectively). We report 20 novel disease-causing variants in different known disease-associated genes and new genotype-phenotype associations for the genes KMT2D, MN1, CDK10, and EXOC3L2. Based on our data, we postulate that sES of fetal index cases with a concurrent sampling of parental probes for targeted testing of the origin of detected fetal variants could be a suitable tool to obtain reliable and rapid prenatal results, particularly in situations where a trio analysis is not possible.

OFD1: One gene, several disorders

The OFD1 protein is necessary for the formation of primary cilia and left–right asymmetry establishment but additional functions have also been ascribed to this multitask protein. When mutated, this protein results in a variety of phenotypes ranging from multiorgan involvement, such as OFD type I (OFDI) and Joubert syndromes (JBS10), and Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), to the engagement of single tissues such as in the case of retinitis pigmentosa (RP23). The inheritance pattern of these condition differs from X‐linked dominant male‐lethal (OFDI) to X‐linked recessive (JBS10, PCD, and RP23). Distinctive biological peculiarities of the protein, which can contribute to explain the extreme clinical variability and the genetic mechanisms underlying the different disorders are discussed. The extensive spectrum of clinical manifestations observed in OFD1‐mutated patients represents a paradigmatic example of the complexity of genetic diseases. The elucidation of the mechanisms underlying this complexity will expand our comprehension of inherited disorders and will improve the clinical management of patients.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Assessing women’s preferences towards tests that may reveal uncertain results from prenatal genomic testing: Development of attributes for a discrete choice experiment, using a mixed-methods design

Prenatal DNA tests, such as chromosomal microarray analysis or exome sequencing, increase the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis when fetal structural anomalies are identified. However, some parents will receive uncertain results such as variants of uncertain significance and secondary findings. We aimed to develop a set of attributes and associated levels for a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) that will examine parents’ preferences for tests that may reveal uncertain test results. A two phase mixed-methods approach was used to develop attributes for the DCE. In Phase 1, a “long list” of candidate attributes were identified via two approaches: 1) a systematic review of the literature around parental experiences of uncertainty following prenatal testing; 2) 16 semi-structured interviews with parents who had experienced uncertainty during pregnancy and 25 health professionals who return uncertain prenatal results. In Phase 2, a quantitative scoring exercise with parents prioritised the candidate attributes. Clinically appropriate levels for each attribute were then developed. A final set of five attributes and levels were identified: likelihood of getting a result, reporting of variants of uncertain significance, reporting of secondary findings, time taken to receive results, and who tells you about your result. These attributes will be used in an international DCE study to investigate preferences and differences across countries. This research will inform best practice for professionals supporting parents to manage uncertainty in the prenatal setting.

Prenatal Exome Sequencing in Recurrent Fetal Structural Anomalies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES), a microarray analysis was carried out of fetuses with recurrent fetal structural anomalies (with similar anomalies in consecutive pregnancies). This is a systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The selected studies describing ES in fetuses with recurrent fetal malformation were assessed using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) criteria for risk of bias. Incidence was used as the pooled effect size by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling (weighted by inverse of variance). We identified nine studies on ES diagnostic yield that included 140 fetuses with recurrent structural anomalies. A pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was found in 57 fetuses, resulting in a 40% (95%CI: 26% to 54%) incremental performance pool of ES. As expected, the vast majority (86%: 36/42) of the newly identified diseases had a recessive inheritance pattern, and among these, 42% (15/36) of variants were found in homozygosity. Meckel syndrome was the monogenic disease most frequently found, although the genes involved were diverse. The ES diagnostic yield in pregnancies with recurrent fetal structural anomalies was 40% (57/140). Homozygous disease-causing variants were found in 36% (15/57) of the newly identified monogenic disorders.

Molecular autopsy by proxy in preconception counseling

Monogenic diseases that result in early pregnancy loss or neonatal death are genetically and phenotypically highly variable. This often poses significant challenges in arriving at a molecular diagnosis for reproductive planning. Molecular autopsy by proxy (MABP) refers to the genetic testing of relatives of deceased individuals to deduce the cause of death. Here, we specifically tested couples who lost one or more children/pregnancies with no available DNA. We developed our testing strategy using whole exome sequencing data from 83 consanguineous Saudi couples. We detected the shared carrier state of 50 pathogenic variants/likely pathogenic variants in 43 families and of 28 variants of uncertain significance in 24 families. Negative results were seen in 16 couples after variant reclassification. In 10 families, the risk of more than one genetic disease was documented. Secondary findings were seen in 10 families: either genetic variants with potential clinical consequences for the tested individual or a female carrier for X‐linked conditions. This couple‐based approach has enabled molecularly informed genetic counseling for 52% (43/83 families). Given the predominance of autosomal recessive causes of pregnancy and child death in consanguineous populations, MABP can be a helpful approach to consanguineous couples who seek counseling but lack molecular data on their deceased offspring.

The Added Value of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Anomalous Fetuses With Detailed Prenatal Ultrasound and Postnatal Phenotype

Objectives

The objective of the study was to explore the added value of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in abnormal fetuses with detailed prenatal ultrasound and postnatal phenotype with normal karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).

Methods

Parents of fetuses with structural abnormalities by prenatal ultrasound who consented to provide fetal samples were prospectively recruited from January 2017 to December 2019. With aneuploidies or cases with copy number variations (CNVs) excluded, WES was performed for cases with normal karyotype and CMA results. Detailed prenatal ultrasound and postnatal imaging or pathology features were recommended for further interpretation of genetic variants.

Results

WES was performed for 94 eligible fetuses, DNA samples of which were extracted from 53 parent-fetus trios and 41 proband-only fetal tissues. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 37 (39.4%) of 94 fetuses, and 34 (64.2%) were detected in 53 trios, which was significantly greater than 3 (7.3%) in 41 proband-only cases (p < 0.001). In 34 trios with diagnostic genetic variants, 23 (67.6%) were de novo and 11 (32.4%) were inherited with two homozygous and nine heterozygous variants. Fourteen (14.9%) of 94 fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Among 94 cases, six affected pregnancies continued and 88 terminated, and 57 of 88 terminated cases underwent postmortem examinations. With accurate phenotypes demonstrated by prenatal ultrasound and postnatal autopsies, the clinical phenotypes were correlated in 33 (89.2%) of 37 cases with specific genotypes, with the highest matching ratio in skeletal diseases (20/33, 60.6%).

Conclusion

WES has added value in the genetic diagnosis of abnormal fetuses with normal karyotypes and CMA, particularly in skeletal diseases. Using WES in various anomalous fetuses can broaden the understanding of prenatal phenotypes and genetic variants.

The prenatal exome - a door to prenatal diagnostics?

Introduction: Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) allows parents the opportunity to obtain arapid molecular diagnosis of monogenic etiology when their fetus is found to have structural anomalies detected on prenatal ultrasound. Such information can improve antenatal and neonatal counseling, decision-making and management, and expand reproductive options in subsequent pregnancies.Areas covered: This review appraises the evidence, from acomprehensive search of bibliographic databases, for the introduction of ES into the fetal medicine care pathway when investigating congenital malformations. The perspectives of clinical geneticists, clinical scientists, fetal medicine specialists, and patients are explored in relation to the novel investigation and the benefits and challenges of its use in ongoing pregnancies with particular reference to UK medical practice.Expert opinion: ES provides agenetic diagnosis for more than 1 in 10 fetuses with structural differences on ultrasound and normal conventional tests (karyotype or chromosomal microarray) in carefully selected cases. The diagnostic rate increases for certain phenotypes and can range between 6% and 80% where conventional cytogenetics have not detected adiagnosis. Expert oversight is required to ensure that patients receive high-quality, evidence-based care and accurate counseling, supported by amultidisciplinary team familiar with the test and its implications.

The diagnostic efficacy of exome data analysis using fixed neurodevelopmental gene lists: Implications for prenatal setting

OBJECTIVE

Laboratories performing prenatal exome sequencing (ES) frequently limit analysis to predetermined gene lists. We used a diagnostic postnatal ES cohort to assess how many of the genes diagnosed are not included in a number of select fixed lists used for prenatal diagnosis.

METHODS

Of 601 postnatal ES tests, pathogenic variants related to neurodevelopmental disorders were detected in 138 probands. We evaluated if causative genes were present in the following: (1) Developmental Disorders Genotype-Phenotype database list, (2) a commercial laboratory list for prenatal ES, (3) the PanelApp fetal anomalies panel, and (4) a published list used for prenatal diagnosis by ES (Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes study).

RESULTS

The percentages of cases where the diagnosed gene was not included in the selected four lists were; 11.6%, 17.24%, 23.2%, and 10.9%, respectively. In 13/138 (9.4%) cases, the causative gene was not included in any of the lists; in 4/13 (∼30%) cases noninclusion was explained by a relatively recent discovery of gene-phenotype association.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of genes related to neurocognitive phenotypes are not included in some of the lists used for prenatal ES data interpretation. These are not only genes related to recently discovered disorders, but also genes with well-established gene-phenotype.

Identifying the causes of recurrent pregnancy loss in consanguineous couples using whole exome sequencing on the products of miscarriage with no chromosomal abnormalities

Recurrent miscarriages occur in about 5% of couples trying to conceive. In the past decade, the products of miscarriage have been studied using array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH). Within the last decade, an association has been proposed between miscarriages and single or multigenic changes, introducing the possibility of detecting other underlying genetic factors by whole exome sequencing (WES). We performed a-CGH on the products of miscarriage from 1625 Iranian women in consanguineous or non-consanguineous marriages. WES was carried out on DNA extracted from the products of miscarriage from 20 Iranian women in consanguineous marriages and with earlier normal genetic testing. Using a-CGH, a statistically significant difference was detected between the frequency of imbalances in related vs. unrelated couples (P < 0.001). WES positively identified relevant alterations in 11 genes in 65% of cases. In 45% of cases, we were able to classify these variants as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, while in the remainder, the variants were classified as of unknown significance. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to employ WES on the products of miscarriage in consanguineous families with recurrent miscarriages regardless of the presence of fetal abnormalities. We propose that WES can be helpful in making a diagnosis of lethal disorders in consanguineous couples after prior genetic testing.

The role of next-generation sequencing in the investigation of ultrasound-identified fetal structural anomalies

Fetal structural anomalies have an impact on fetal mortality and morbidity. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may be incorporated into clinical pathways for investigation of paediatric morbidity but can also be used to delineate the prognosis of fetal anomalies. This paper reviews the role of NGS in the investigation of fetal malformations, the literature defining the clinical utility, the technique most commonly used and potential promise and challenges for implementation into clinical practice. Prospective case selection with informative pre-test counselling by multidisciplinary teams is imperative. Regulated laboratory sequencing, bioinformatic pathways with potential variant identification and conservative matching with the phenotype is important. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Prenatal exome sequencing in fetal structural anomalies yields diagnostic information in up to 20% of cases.

Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review

The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies extensively, and the role of incidental/secondary or inconclusive findings and negative results has not been fully ascertained. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic yield, as well as inconclusive and negative-result rates of pES. Papers were divided in two groups. The former includes fetuses presenting structural anomalies, regardless the involved organ; the latter focuses on specific class anomalies. Available findings on non-informative or negative results were gathered as well. In the first group, the weighted average diagnostic yield resulted 19%, and inconclusive finding rate 12%. In the second group, the percentages were extremely variable due to differences in sample sizes and inclusion criteria, which constitute major determinants of pES efficiency. Diagnostic pES availability and its application have a pivotal role in prenatal diagnosis, though more homogeneity in access criteria and a consensus on clinical management of controversial information management is envisageable to reach widespread use in the near future.

The potential diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing in pregnancies complicated by fetal ultrasound anomalies

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the potential diagnostic yield of prenatal whole exome sequencing in fetuses with structural anomalies on expert ultrasound scans and normal chromosomal microarray results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the period 2013-2016, 391 pregnant women with fetal ultrasound anomalies who received normal chromosomal microarray results, were referred for additional genetic counseling and opted for additional molecular testing pre- and/or postnatally. Most of the couples received only a targeted molecular test and in 159 cases (40.7%) whole exome sequencing (broad gene panels or open exome) was performed. The results of these molecular tests were evaluated retrospectively, regardless of the time of the genetic diagnosis (prenatal or postnatal).

RESULTS

In 76 of 391 fetuses (19.4%, 95% CI 15.8%-23.6%) molecular testing provided a genetic diagnosis with identification of (likely) pathogenic variants. In the majority of cases (91.1%, 73/76) the (likely) pathogenic variant would be detected by prenatal whole exome sequencing analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective cohort study shows that prenatal whole exome sequencing, if offered by a clinical geneticist, in addition to chromosomal microarray, would notably increase the diagnostic yield in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and would allow early diagnosis of a genetic disorder irrespective of the (incomplete) fetal phenotype.

Impact of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal genetic diagnosis on maternal psychological outcomes and decisional conflict in a prospective cohort

PURPOSE

To evaluate associations between prenatal trio exome sequencing (trio-ES) and psychological outcomes among women with an anomalous pregnancy.

METHODS

Trio-ES study enrolling patients with major fetal anomaly and normal microarray. Women completed self-reported measures and free response interviews at two timepoints: pre- (1) and post- (2) sequencing. Pre-sequencing responses were compared with post-sequencing responses; post-sequencing responses were stratified by women who received trio-ES results that may explain fetal findings, secondary findings (medically actionable or couples with heterozygous variants for the same recessive disorder), or negative results.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen trios were enrolled. Of those, 41/115 (35.7%) received results from trio-ES, including 36 (31.3%) who received results that may explain the fetal phenotype. These women had greater post-sequencing distress compared with women who received negative results, including generalized distress (p = 0.03) and test-related distress (p = 0.2); they also had worse psychological adaptation to results (p = 0.001). Genomic knowledge did not change from pre- to post-sequencing (p = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Women show more distress after receiving trio-ES results compared with those who do not, suggesting that women receiving results may need additional support or counseling to inform current and future reproductive decisions.

Whole exome sequencing of fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of whole exome sequencing (WES) for the genetic diagnosis of cases presenting with fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography. WES was performed on 19 cases with prenatal structural anomalies. Genomic DNA was extracted from umbilical cords or umbilical blood obtained shortly after birth. WES data were analyzed on prenatal phenotypes alone, and the data were re-analyzed after information regarding the postnatal phenotype was obtained. Based solely on the fetal phenotype, pathogenic, or likely pathogenic, single nucleotide variants were identified in 5 of 19 (26.3%) cases. Moreover, we detected trisomy 21 in two cases by WES-based copy number variation analysis. The overall diagnostic rate was 36.8% (7/19). They were all compatible with respective fetal structural anomalies. By referring to postnatal phenotype information, another candidate variant was identified by a postnatal clinical feature that was not detected in prenatal screening. As detailed phenotyping is desirable for better diagnostic rates in WES analysis, we should be aware that fetal phenotype is a useful, but sometimes limited source of information for comprehensive genetic analysis. It is important to amass more data of genotype-phenotype correlations, especially to appropriately assess the validity of WES in prenatal settings.

Application of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis: a rapid scoping review

Genetic diagnosis provides important information for prenatal decision-making and management. Promising results from exome sequencing (ES) for genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural anomalies are emerging. The objective of this scoping review was to identify what is known about the use of ES for genetic testing in prenatal cases with known or suspected genetic disease. A rapid scoping review was conducted over a six-week timeframe of English-language peer-reviewed studies. Search strategies for major databases (e.g., Medline) and gray literature were developed, and peer reviewed by information specialists. Identified studies were categorized and charted using tables and diagrams. Twenty-four publications were included from seven countries published between 2014 and 2019. Most commonly reported outcomes were diagnostic yields, which varied widely from 5% to 57%, and prenatal phenotype. Few studies reported clinical outcomes related to impact, decision-making, and clinical utility. Qualitative studies (n = 6) provided useful insights into patient and health-care provider experiences with ES. Findings suggest prenatal ES is beneficial, but more research is needed to better understand the clinical utility, circumstances for ideal use, feasibility, and costs of offering rapid ES as a routine option for prenatal genetic testing.

Genotype-first in a cohort of 95 fetuses with multiple congenital abnormalities: when exome sequencing reveals unexpected fetal phenotype-genotype correlations

PURPOSE

Molecular diagnosis based on singleton exome sequencing (sES) is particularly challenging in fetuses with multiple congenital abnormalities (MCA). Indeed, some studies reveal a diagnostic yield of about 20%, far lower than in live birth individuals showing developmental abnormalities (30%), suggesting that standard analyses, based on the correlation between clinical hallmarks described in postnatal syndromic presentations and genotype, may underestimate the impact of the genetic variants identified in fetal analyses.

METHODS

We performed sES in 95 fetuses with MCA. Blind to phenotype, we applied a genotype-first approach consisting of combined analyses based on variants annotation and bioinformatics predictions followed by reverse phenotyping. Initially applied to OMIM-morbid genes, analyses were then extended to all genes. We complemented our approach by using reverse phenotyping, variant segregation analysis, bibliographic search and data sharing in order to establish the clinical significance of the prioritised variants.

RESULTS

sES rapidly identified causal variant in 24/95 fetuses (25%), variants of unknown significance in OMIM genes in 8/95 fetuses (8%) and six novel candidate genes in 6/95 fetuses (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This method, based on a genotype-first approach followed by reverse phenotyping, shed light on unexpected fetal phenotype-genotype correlations, emphasising the relevance of prenatal studies to reveal extreme clinical presentations associated with well-known Mendelian disorders.

Fetal Exome Sequencing on the Horizon

Prenatal whole exome sequencing has recently been introduced. It is evolving and although not currently ready for everyday clinical practice, it will likely become part of the diagnostic arsenal available to clinicians caring for couples carrying a pregnancy for which fetal anomalies have been identified. This commentary discusses what it is, its indications, its benefits, and its limitations.

Genetic diagnosis in the fetus

Many genetic disorders are detectable in the prenatal period, and the capacity to identify them has increased remarkably as molecular genetic testing techniques continue to improve and become incorporated into clinical practice. The indications for prenatal genetic testing vary widely, including follow-up of an anomaly found by routine ultrasound or maternal aneuploidy screening, a family history of genetic disease, advanced maternal or paternal age, or evaluation of a low-risk pregnancy due to parental concern. The interpretation of genetic variants identified in the prenatal period poses unique challenges due to the lack of ability for deep phenotyping as well as the option to make critical decisions regarding pregnancy continuation and perinatal management. In this review, we address the various modalities currently available and commonly used for genetic testing, including preimplantation genetic testing of embryos, cell-free DNA testing, and diagnostic procedures such as chorionic villous sampling, amniocentesis, or percutaneous umbilical blood sampling, from which samples may be sent for a wide variety of genetic tests. We discuss the difference between these modalities for the genetic diagnosis of a fetus, their strengths and weaknesses, and strategies for their optimal use in order to direct perinatal care.

Couples experiences of receiving uncertain results following prenatal microarray or exome sequencing: A mixed-methods systematic review

Background

Tests in pregnancy such as chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing are increasing diagnostic yield for fetal structural anomalies, but have greater potential to result in uncertain findings. This systematic review investigated the experiences of prospective parents about receiving uncertain results from these tests.

Methods

A systematic search of three electronic databases was conducted. Data extraction was performed for studies that met the eligibility and quality criteria. Results were synthesised following the principles of thematic analysis.

Results

Fourteen studies (10 qualitative, 4 quantitative) were included. Findings were grouped into three overarching themes. Sources of uncertainty included the testing procedure, the diagnosis and prognosis, and health professionals' own uncertainty. The clinical impact of the uncertainty included parents struggling to make clinical decisions with the information available, the emotional impact included decisional‐regret, shock, worry and feeling overwhelmed. To manage the uncertainty, parents sought support from healthcare professionals, friends, family, the internet and other parents as well as remaining hopeful.

Conclusions

Prospective parents experience a myriad of uncertainties in the prenatal setting, which must be handled sensitively. Future research should explore optimal ways of managing uncertainty to minimise harm. Recommendations are made for discussing uncertainty during pre‐ and post‐test counseling.

Prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias using whole exome sequencing in China

BACKGROUND

Skeletal dysplasias account for nearly 10% of fetal structural malformations detected by ultrasonography. This clinically heterogeneous group of genetic anomaly includes at least 461 genetic skeletal disorders with extreme clinical, phenotypic, and genetic heterogeneities, thus, significantly complicates accurate diagnosis. Researches have used whole exome sequencing (WES) for prenatal molecular diagnoses of skeletal dysplasias, however, data are still limited.

METHODS

DNA extracted from umbilical cord blood or amniocytes from fetuses suspected of skeletal dysplasias based on ultrasound evaluations were analyzed by WES. Blood samples were taken from the parents of the positive fetuses for co-segregation analysis using Sanger sequencing.

RESULT

Definitive molecular diagnosis was made in 6/8 (75%) cases, comprised of 5 de novo disease-causing changes in 3 genes (FGFR3, COL2A1, and COL1A2) and one proband with a biallelic deficiency for Lamin B Receptor(LBR),and including 3 novel variants. All fetuses had no detectable copy number variation (CNV) from sequencing results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that WES is an efficient approach for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses suspected of skeletal abnormalities and contributes to parental genetics counseling and pregnancy management.

Considerations for whole exome sequencing unique to prenatal care

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is increasingly being used in the prenatal setting. The emerging data support the clinical utility of prenatal WES based on its diagnostic yield, which can be as high as 80% for certain ultrasound findings. However, detailed practice and laboratory guidelines, addressing the indications for prenatal WES and the surrounding technical, interpretation, ethical, and counseling issues, are still lacking. Herein, we review the literature and summarize the most recent findings and applications of prenatal WES. This review offers specialists and clinical genetic laboratorians a body of evidence and expert opinions that can serve as a resource to assist in their practice. Finally, we highlight the emerging technologies that promise a future of prenatal WES without the risks associated with invasive testing.

Next-Generation Sequencing Using a Cardiac Gene Panel in Prenatally Diagnosed Cardiac Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

Most prenatally identified congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the sole structural anomaly detected; however, there is a subgroup of cases where the specific genetic cause will impact prognosis, including chromosome abnormalities and single-gene causes. Next-generation sequencing of all the protein coding regions in the genome or targeted to genes involved in cardiac development is currently possible in the prenatal period, but there are minimal data on the clinical utility of such an approach. This study assessed the outcome of a CHD gene panel that included single-gene causes of syndromic and non-syndromic CHDs.

METHOD

Sixteen cases with a fetal CHD identified on prenatal ultrasound were studied using a 108 CHD gene panel. DNA was extracted from cultured amniocytes.

RESULTS

There was no diagnostic pathogenic variant identified in these cases. There was an average of 2.9 reportable variants identified per case and the majority of them were variants of uncertain significance.

CONCLUSION

Next-generation sequencing has the potential for increased genetic diagnosis for fetal anomalies. However, the large number of variants and the absence of an examinable patient make the interpretation of these variants challenging.

Prenatal Genetic Testing Options

All patients should be offered prenatal screening and diagnosis. Testing options depend on many factors, including patient age, family history, and patient preference. Options are rapidly changing with emerging technology. Aneuploidy screening options include ultrasound, maternal analytes, and cell-free DNA. Prenatal chromosomal microarray is the recommended diagnostic test for patients with anomalies visualized on prenatal ultrasound. Prenatal whole exome sequencing is clinically available but is limited by challenges with counseling, interpretation, and turn-around time. Future technologies are emerging and may soon allow for translation of prenatal diagnosis to in utero therapy.

From diagnostic yield to clinical impact: a pilot study on the implementation of prenatal exome sequencing in routine care

PURPOSE

Exome sequencing (ES) is an efficient tool to diagnose genetic disorders postnatally. Recent studies show that it may have a considerable diagnostic yield in fetuses with structural anomalies on ultrasound. We report on the clinical impact of the implementation of prenatal ES (pES) for ongoing pregnancies in routine care.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the impact of pES on pregnancy outcome and pre- or perinatal management in the first 22 patients counseled for pES because of one or more structural anomalies on fetal ultrasound.

RESULTS

In two cases, a diagnosis was made by chromosomal microarray analysis after ES counseling. The remaining 20 cases were divided in three groups: (1) pES to aid parental decision making (n = 12), (2) pES in the context of late pregnancy termination requests (n = 5), and (3) pES to guide pre- or perinatal management (n = 3). pES had a clinical impact in 75% (9/12), 40% (2/5), and 100% (3/3) respectively, showing an overall clinical impact of pES of 70% (14/20).

CONCLUSION

We show that clinical implementation of pES is feasible and affects parental decision making or pre- and perinatal management supporting further implementation of ES in the prenatal setting.

Novel pathogenic variants in GBE1 causing fetal akinesia deformation sequence and severe neuromuscular form of glycogen storage disease type IV

Glycogen storage disease IV (GSD IV), caused by a defect in GBE1, is a clinically heterogeneous disorder. A classical hepatic form and a neuromuscular form have been described. The severe neuromuscular form presents as a fetal akinesia deformation sequence or a congenital subtype. We ascertained three unrelated families with fetuses/neonates who presented with fetal akinesia deformation sequence to our clinic for genetic counseling. We performed a detailed clinical evaluation, exome sequencing, and histopathology examination of two fetuses and two neonates from three unrelated families presenting with these perinatally lethal neuromuscular forms of GSD IV. Exome sequencing in the affected fetuses/neonates identified four novel pathogenic variants (c.1459G>T, c.144-1G>A, c.1680C>G, and c.1843G>C) in GBE1 (NM_000158). Histopathology examination of tissues from the affected fetuses/neonate was consistent with the diagnosis. Here, we add three more families with the severe perinatally lethal neuromuscular forms of GSD IV to the GBE1 mutation spectrum.

Genetics professionals' attitudes toward prenatal exome sequencing

Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) currently has limited use in the clinical setting, but research suggests that it has added diagnostic utility over karyotyping and array techniques for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses presenting with ultrasound abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes of genetics professionals toward the clinical implementation of prenatal ES in order to guide development of professional guidelines. A survey was developed using themes identified in previous qualitative studies and was distributed to members of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), and the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). A total of 498 participants completed some portion of the survey. There was consensus among participants that there would be clinical utility of prenatal ES when used for diagnosis, pregnancy management, and termination decisions. The majority also agreed that prenatal ES was distinct from its current use in the pediatric and adult settings. There were many areas of contention regarding which types of results should be returned to families and whether or not the current ACMG guidelines for return of incidental findings should also apply to the prenatal setting. Overall, professional guidance is needed to address the continuing concerns surrounding prenatal ES as its utilization in this setting is expected to grow.

Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Fetal structural anomalies, which are detected by ultrasonography, have a range of genetic causes, including chromosomal aneuploidy, copy number variations (CNVs; which are detectable by chromosomal microarrays), and pathogenic sequence variants in developmental genes. Testing for aneuploidy and CNVs is routine during the investigation of fetal structural anomalies, but there is little information on the clinical usefulness of genome-wide next-generation sequencing in the prenatal setting. We therefore aimed to evaluate the proportion of fetuses with structural abnormalities that had identifiable variants in genes associated with developmental disorders when assessed with whole-exome sequencing (WES).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, two groups in Birmingham and London recruited patients from 34 fetal medicine units in England and Scotland. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to evaluate the presence of genetic variants in developmental disorder genes (diagnostic genetic variants) in a cohort of fetuses with structural anomalies and samples from their parents, after exclusion of aneuploidy and large CNVs. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were undergoing invasive testing for identified nuchal translucency or structural anomalies in their fetus, as detected by ultrasound after 11 weeks of gestation. The partners of these women also had to consent to participate. Sequencing results were interpreted with a targeted virtual gene panel for developmental disorders that comprised 1628 genes. Genetic results related to fetal structural anomaly phenotypes were then validated and reported postnatally. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in all fetuses, was the detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the fetal developmental anomaly.

FINDINGS

The cohort was recruited between Oct 22, 2014, and June 29, 2017, and clinical data were collected until March 31, 2018. After exclusion of fetuses with aneuploidy and CNVs, 610 fetuses with structural anomalies and 1202 matched parental samples (analysed as 596 fetus-parental trios, including two sets of twins, and 14 fetus-parent dyads) were analysed by WES. After bioinformatic filtering and prioritisation according to allele frequency and effect on protein and inheritance pattern, 321 genetic variants (representing 255 potential diagnoses) were selected as potentially pathogenic genetic variants (diagnostic genetic variants), and these variants were reviewed by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 52 (8·5%; 95% CI 6·4-11·0) of 610 fetuses assessed and an additional 24 (3·9%) fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance that had potential clinical usefulness. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants enabled us to distinguish between syndromic and non-syndromic fetal anomalies (eg, congenital heart disease only vs a syndrome with congenital heart disease and learning disability). Diagnostic genetic variants were present in 22 (15·4%) of 143 fetuses with multisystem anomalies (ie, more than one fetal structural anomaly), nine (11·1%) of 81 fetuses with cardiac anomalies, and ten (15·4%) of 65 fetuses with skeletal anomalies; these phenotypes were most commonly associated with diagnostic variants. However, diagnostic genetic variants were least common in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency (≥4·0 mm) in the first trimester (in three [3·2%] of 93 fetuses).

INTERPRETATION

WES facilitates genetic diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, which enables more accurate predictions of fetal prognosis and risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. However, the overall detection of diagnostic genetic variants in a prospectively ascertained cohort with a broad range of fetal structural anomalies is lower than that suggested by previous smaller-scale studies of fewer phenotypes. WES improved the identification of genetic disorders in fetuses with structural abnormalities; however, before clinical implementation, careful consideration should be given to case selection to maximise clinical usefulness.

FUNDING

UK Department of Health and Social Care and The Wellcome Trust.

Fetal exome sequencing: yield and limitations in a tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVE

To explore the indications for and diagnostic outcomes of fetal exome sequencing in a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2017, 77 unrelated fetal samples from pregnancies referred to our center underwent exome sequencing. The cohort included 37 fetuses, 36 products of conception (from cases of pregnancy termination or intrauterine fetal death), one case with DNA from both the fetus and a previous termination of pregnancy, and three cases with DNA of unknown origin. Exome sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from amniocytes or fetal tissue and, in some cases, from parental peripheral blood. Indications, turnaround time, diagnostic rates and pregnancy outcomes were investigated. Diagnostic yield was analyzed according to consanguinity (yes or no), sample type (proband only, or trio or other) and referral indication (malformation or isolated nuchal translucency (NT)).

RESULTS

The most common indication for fetal exome sequencing was multiple malformations (21/77, 27%), followed by isolated brain malformation (15/77, 19%). Twelve (16%) fetuses were referred for isolated increased NT. Exome analysis was diagnostic for 16 fetuses (21%); when subclassified into fetal malformations vs isolated increased NT it became clear that exome analysis did not reveal any known or probable pathogenic variants in cases referred for isolated increased NT, whereas, among the remaining fetuses, a molecular diagnosis was reached in 16/65 (25%). Proband-only cases received a diagnosis more often than did cases that had trio exome sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS

Exome sequencing has the potential to provide molecular diagnoses in cases in which conventional prenatal cytogenetic testing is negative. Referral bias of consanguineous cases could account for the high diagnostic rate of proband-only sequencing. Syndrome-specific prognostic information enables parents to make informed decisions, whereas challenges include time limitations and variant interpretation in the setting of non-specific fetal findings. As we report only established disease-gene associations, further segregation and functional studies in a research setting are expected to increase significantly the diagnostic yield. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Whole exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis in cases with fetal anomalies: Criteria to improve diagnostic yield

Whole exome sequencing (WES) for prenatal diagnosis has a reported diagnostic yield of 6.2%-57%. Our aim was to identify patients with a high likelihood of genetic diagnosis using WES in cases with fetal ultrasound anomalies. This is a series of five selected cases for prenatal WES at our institution. Pregnant couples were initially identified due to fetal ultrasound anomalies. Candidates for WES for fetal diagnosis had a normal fetal karyotype and negative microarray with at least one of the following: parental consanguinity, large regions of homozygosity on fetal microarray, or high likelihood of single gene disorder based on ultrasound findings. All trios underwent sequencing of parental and fetal samples. WES was diagnostic in four of the five cases (80%). We identified two recessive conditions and two de novo mutations. Four couples consented to secondary findings and in one case, the father was found to have an MSH2 mutation associated with Lynch syndrome. The use of specific selection criteria for WES increased diagnostic yield to 80%. This is higher than previously reported. Wide application of our criteria can help identify those who may benefit most from this testing in prenatal diagnosis.

Clinical exome sequencing for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and a suspected Mendelian disorder

Background

Exome sequencing is now being incorporated into clinical care for pediatric and adult populations, but its integration into prenatal diagnosis has been more limited. One reason for this is the paucity of information about the clinical utility of exome sequencing in the prenatal setting.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed indications, results, time to results (turnaround time, TAT), and impact of exome results for 146 consecutive “fetal exomes” performed in a clinical diagnostic laboratory between March 2012 and November 2017. We define a fetal exome as one performed on a sample obtained from a fetus or a product of conception with at least one structural anomaly detected by prenatal imaging or autopsy. Statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Prenatal exome yielded an overall molecular diagnostic rate of 32% (n = 46/146). Of the 46 molecular diagnoses, 50% were autosomal dominant disorders (n = 23/46), 41% were autosomal recessive disorders (n = 19/46), and 9% were X-linked disorders (n = 4/46). The molecular diagnostic rate was highest for fetuses with anomalies affecting multiple organ systems and for fetuses with craniofacial anomalies. Out of 146 cases, a prenatal trio exome option designed for ongoing pregnancies was performed on 62 fetal specimens, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 35% with an average TAT of 14 days for initial reporting (excluding tissue culture time). The molecular diagnoses led to refined recurrence risk estimates, altered medical management, and informed reproductive planning for families.

Conclusion

Exome sequencing is a useful diagnostic tool when fetal structural anomalies suggest a genetic etiology, but other standard prenatal genetic tests did not provide a diagnosis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-018-0582-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Whole Exome Sequencing: Applications in Prenatal Genetics

Prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) has the potential to increase the ability to provide more diagnostic capabilities in fetuses with sonographic abnormalities, which would then improve the ability to counsel families. It is also often the first step in improving the path toward informed diagnosis and treatment, which is especially important in the era of advancing in utero fetal therapy. This article discusses the current literature regarding prenatal WES, clinical indications for WES, challenges with interpretation/counseling (variants of unknown significance), research priorities, ethical issues, and potential future advances.

Parental perceptions of prenatal whole exome sequencing (PPPWES) study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to investigate the experiences of couples who underwent prenatal whole-exome sequencing (WES) for fetal anomalies and the amount/type of information couples want from prenatal WES.

METHOD

Participants in the Fetal Sequencing Study who had genetic testing for fetal anomalies were invited for a semistructured interview about their experience with prenatal WES. A constructivist grounded theory approach with an inductive coding style was used for coding and analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 29 participants from 17 pregnancies. Two pregnancies had positive prenatal WES results, and 4 were terminated prior to receipt of WES results. The main themes were anxiety and stress around the time of diagnosis, education and consent for WES, coping and support while waiting for results, and receiving genetic testing results. In response to hypothetical scenarios probing the desire for uncertain results, 86% would like to be told about results for which the provider had some degree of uncertainty, and the percent desiring results decreased as the certainty of the results decreased.

CONCLUSION

Participants' experience with exome sequence was similar to other prenatal genetic diagnostic tests, except for the longer wait time for results. When probed with hypothetical scenarios, participants desired more results than were provided in the study, including uncertain results that might diagnose the fetal condition. This highlights the need for specialized prenatal genetic counseling to have nuanced discussions of multiple dimensions of uncertainty with implementation of prenatal WES.

Next-generation sequencing and prenatal 'omics: advanced diagnostics and new insights into human development

Prenatal genetics has evolved over the last decade to include application of new 'omics technologies to improve perinatal care. The clinical utility of these technologies when applied to direct fetal specimens from amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling is being explored. In this review, we provide an overview of use of prenatal exome sequencing and role in evaluation of the structurally abnormal fetus, potential applications of genome sequencing, and finally, use of transcriptomics to assess placental and fetal well-being.

Introducing new and emerging genetic tests into prenatal care

Given the rapid advances in genomics, translating new genomic tests effectively into prenatal clinical practice remains challenging. We discuss emerging genetic tests, considerations for their use, how tests should ideally be validated prior to use in clinical practice, and the role of the Federal Drug Administration, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratories, commercial laboratories, insurers, and professional societies such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) in the introduction of new prenatal genetic tests. After the introduction of new tests into the prenatal clinic, it is critical to utilize shared databases with measured outcomes to improve clinical care as well as to advance science.

Exome sequencing identifies novel ACE splice-site variant in a fetus with renal tubular dysgenesis

We report a 32-week fetus conceived of consanguineous parentage which presented with severe early onset oligohydramnios and history of a similarly affected sibling in previous pregnancy. Ultrasonography and autopsy were inconclusive, prompting exome sequencing on fetal DNA. This resulted in identification of a homozygous novel 3' splice-site variation in intron 17 of the ACE gene (NM_000789.3:c.2642-1G>A), confirming diagnosis of autosomal recessive renal tubular dysgenesis, and facilitating prenatal diagnosis in subsequent pregnancy.

Prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias using a targeted skeletal gene panel

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to perform an accurate and precise diagnosis for fetuses with suspected skeletal anomalies based on an incomplete and limited ultrasound phenotype.

METHODS

Proband-only targeted skeletal gene panel sequencing was performed on 12 families who had fetuses with suspected skeletal anomalies based on ultrasound evaluations at a mean gestational age of 24 weeks and 3 days. The fetuses all had normal standard genetic testing yield (karyotyping and microarray).

RESULTS

In 10 of 12 fetuses, panel sequencing provided a diagnosis or possible diagnosis with identification of variants in the following genes: FGFR3, COL1A2, IHH, COL2A1, and DYNC2H1. Two cases revealed novel variants in COL2A1 and DYNC2H1.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that targeted skeletal gene panel sequencing is highly sensitive for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses presenting with unexpected ultrasound findings suggestive of a skeletal dysplasia.

LMOD3-Associated Nemaline Myopathy: Prenatal Ultrasonographic, Pathologic, and Molecular Findings

To describe the prenatal presentation, including ultrasonographic, histologic, and molecular findings, in 2 fetuses affected with LMOD3-related nemaline myopathy. Prenatal ultrasonographic examinations and histopathologic studies were performed on 2 fetuses with evidence of nemaline myopathy. To establish a molecular diagnosis, whole-exome sequencing was pursued for the affected fetuses. Nemaline myopathy is a common form of congenital myopathy manifesting with nonprogressive generalized muscle weakness, hypotonia, and electron-dense protein inclusions in skeletal myofibers. Although clinically, nemaline myopathy can be viewed as a common pathway phenotype, its molecular basis is heterogeneous, with mutations in 11 identified genes implicated in its pathogenesis so far. Whole-exome sequencing revealed that the affected fetuses were compound heterozygous for 2 newly reported pathogenic variants in the LMOD3 gene, which encodes leiomodin 3. To our knowledge, this article is the first report of LMOD3-related nemaline myopathy since the original reported cohort. We provide a detailed description of the prenatal imaging of these affected fetuses, which we hope, in combination with next-generation sequencing, may contribute to further diagnosis in additional families.