Cell-free DNA is higher and more fragmented in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Analysis of retest reliability for pregnant women undergoing cfDNA testing with a no-call result

BACKGROUND

Determining the reasons for unreportable or no-call cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test results has been an ongoing issue, and a consensus on subsequent management is still lacking. This study aimed to explore potential factors related to no-call cfDNA test results and to discuss whether retest results are reliable.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies undergoing cfDNA testing in 2021. Of the 9871 pregnant patients undergoing cfDNA testing, 111 had a no-call result, and their results were compared to those of 170 control patients. The no-call rate was 1.12% (111/9871), and the primary cause for no-call results was data fluctuation (88.29%, 98/111). Medical conditions were significantly more frequent in the no-call group than in the reportable results group (P < 0.001). After retesting, 107 (107/111, 96.40%) patients had a result, and the false-positive rate (FPR) of retesting was 10.09% (10.09%, 11/109). In addition, placental lesions were more frequent in the no-call group than in the reportable results group (P = 0.037), and 4 patients, all in the no-call group, experienced pregnancy loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with medical conditions are more likely to have a no-call result. A retest is suggested for patients with a no-call result, but retests have a high FPR. In addition, pregnant women with a no-call result are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In conclusion, more attention should be given to pregnant women for whom a no-call cfDNA result is obtained.

New Perspectives on the Importance of Cell-Free DNA Biology

Body fluids are constantly replenished with a population of genetically diverse cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments, representing a vast reservoir of information reflecting real-time changes in the host and metagenome. As many body fluids can be collected non-invasively in a one-off and serial fashion, this reservoir can be tapped to develop assays for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of wide-ranging pathologies, such as solid tumors, fetal genetic abnormalities, rejected organ transplants, infections, and potentially many others. The translation of cfDNA research into useful clinical tests is gaining momentum, with recent progress being driven by rapidly evolving preanalytical and analytical procedures, integrated bioinformatics, and machine learning algorithms. Yet, despite these spectacular advances, cfDNA remains a very challenging analyte due to its immense heterogeneity and fluctuation in vivo. It is increasingly recognized that high-fidelity reconstruction of the information stored in cfDNA, and in turn the development of tests that are fit for clinical roll-out, requires a much deeper understanding of both the physico-chemical features of cfDNA and the biological, physiological, lifestyle, and environmental factors that modulate it. This is a daunting task, but with significant upsides. In this review we showed how expanded knowledge on cfDNA biology and faithful reverse-engineering of cfDNA samples promises to (i) augment the sensitivity and specificity of existing cfDNA assays; (ii) expand the repertoire of disease-specific cfDNA markers, thereby leading to the development of increasingly powerful assays; (iii) reshape personal molecular medicine; and (iv) have an unprecedented impact on genetics research.

The association between fetal fraction and pregnancy-related complications among Chinese population

To examine the association of fetal fraction with a wide spectrum of pregnancy-related complications among Chinese population, we carried out a single-institution retrospective cohort study of women with negative Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results and singleton pregnancies between May 2018 and May 2020. Indicators of pregnancy-related complications were examined individually, including preterm birth, low birth weight, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios and intrahepatic cholestasis. We evaluated disease odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), after controlling for potential confounders including body mass index (BMI), maternal age and gestational week at NIPT. A total of 3534 women were included in our analyses. Women with fetal fraction<15.15% had increased risk of gestational hypertension (OR 4.41, CI [1.65, 12.45]) and oligohydramnios (OR 2.26, CI [1.33, 3.80]) compared to women with fetal fraction≥15.15%. No significant associations with fetal fraction were found for preterm birth, low birth weight, gestational diabetes, and intrahepatic cholestasis. In Summary, fetal fraction is inversely associated with the risk of gestational hypertension and oligohydramnios.

The Effect of Elevated Alanine Transaminase on Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures

Objective

To determine the effects of alanine transaminase (ALT) levels on the screening failure rates or “no calls” due to low fetal fraction (FF) to obtain a result in non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).

Methods

NIPS by sequencing and liver enzyme measurements were performed in 7,910 pregnancies at 12–26 weeks of gestation. Univariate and multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the significant predictors of screening failure rates among maternal characteristics and relevant laboratory parameters.

Results

Of the 7,910 pregnancies that met the inclusion criteria, 134 (1.69%) had “no calls.” Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increased body mass index, ALT, prealbumin, albumin levels, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) conception rates were independently associated with screening failures. The test failure rate was higher (4.34 vs. 1.41%; P &lt; 0.001) in IVF pregnancies relative to those with spontaneous conceptions. Meanwhile, the screening failure rates increased with increasing ALT levels from 1.05% at ≤10 U/L to 3.73% at &gt;40 U/L. In particular, IVF pregnancies with an ALT level of &gt;40 U/L had a higher test failure rate (9.52%). Compared with that for an ALT level of ≤10 U/L, the adjusted odds ratio of “no calls” for ALT levels of 10–20, 21–40, and &gt;40 U/L was 1.204 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.709–2.045], 1.529 (95% CI, 0.865–2.702), and 2.764 (95% CI, 1.500–5.093) (Ptrend &lt; 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

Increased ALT and IVF conceptions were associated with a higher screening failure rates in NIPS. Therefore, a feasible strategy to adjust these factors to reduce the probability of “no calls” due to low FF would be of great clinical significance.

Deoxyribonuclease activity negative correlates with extracellular DNA in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies in the third trimester

OBJECTIVES

It is not clear, which factors affect extracellular DNA (ecDNA) concentrations in healthy women with singleton uncomplicated pregnancies, although deoxyribonucleases (DNases) are hypothesized to be responsible for the cleavage of plasma ecDNA. The aim of this study was to analyze potential determinants of total ecDNA including plasma DNase activity.

METHODS

Plasma samples were collected from 48 healthy women with singleton uncomplicated pregnancies in the third trimester (gestation week 37). DNA was isolated and quantified using fluorometry and real time PCR. DNase activity was assessed using the single radial enzyme-diffusion method.

RESULTS

Neither ecDNA, nor DNase activity were affected by maternal age or BMI. DNase activity negatively correlated with total plasma ecDNA (r=-0.40, p=0.007). Similar associations were found for ecDNA of nuclear and mitochondrial origin, but not with fetal DNA quantified using Y-targeted PCR in male fetus-bearing pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of plasma ecDNA of fetal and maternal origin is studied in the pathogenesis of pregnancy-complications. The results indicate that plasma DNase activity could negatively regulate ecDNA concentrations and should, thus, be analyzed in preeclampsia, preterm birth and other ecDNA-related pregnancy complications.

More attention should be paid to pregnant women who fail non-invasive prenatal screening

OBJECTIVE

We discuss how to handle failure of first-pass non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and investigate the pregnancy outcomes after second-pass failure.

METHODS

A total of 35,187 pregnant women underwent NIPS in a single center. Those who failed first-pass NIPS were re-tested after a repeat blood draw. Those who failed again were offered genetic counseling. We recorded antenatal data and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 273 (0.78%) women failed the first test. On re-testing, 220 (80.59%) yielded reliable results and 53 failed the test again. Women with higher total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels evidenced a lower NIPS success rate (40%) and a higher incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most women who failed first-pass NIPS yielded reliable results on repeat testing, especially those with lower fetal fraction. Higher concentrations of cfDNA in maternal plasma were associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes. Such women require special attention, thus early medical intervention, to avoid an adverse prognosis.

Combining the use of a fetal fraction-based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy

Some women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) do not receive an informative result due to low fetal fraction (FF). A proportion of these are at increased risk for fetal trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy, while others have no change from their prior risk. Women with an initial uninformative NIPT need to be counseled about any such change in their risk for fetal abnormality and also the probability that a redraw will be informative. To help in the decision making, we reviewed a dataset of single nucleotide polymorphism‐based NIPT with uninformative results where a redraw was received. Risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy was evaluated using a fetal fraction‐based risk (FFBR) algorithm. Risk‐unchanged women were further analyzed using a regression model to determine the likelihood of an informative redraw. Of 2,644 women with an uninformative NIPT and a redraw, 1,147 (43.4%) were high risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy. 1,497 (56.6%) were risk unchanged and, of these, 975 (65.1%) cases had an informative redraw (i.e., risks were available for 2,122 (80%) of those initially classified as uninformative). The regression model for the risk‐unchanged cases provided a new table for predicting an informative redraw. Likelihood of a successful redraw was significantly (p < .001) dependent on the initial FF, maternal weight, and time between blood draws. We conclude that the FFBR algorithm and the predictive model for an informative redraw provide complementary additions in the management of women presented with an initially uninformative SNP‐based NIPT due to low FF. We suggest approaches for the counseling and follow‐up testing for women with an initially uninformative NIPT.

Cherchez la femme: maternal incidental findings can explain discordant prenatal cell-free DNA sequencing results

Circulating DNA fragments in a pregnant woman's plasma derive from three sources: placenta, maternal bone marrow, and fetus. Prenatal sequencing to noninvasively screen for fetal chromosome abnormalities is performed on this mixed sample; results can therefore reflect the maternal as well as the fetoplacental DNA. Although it is recommended that pretest counseling include the possibility of detecting maternal genomic imbalance, this seldom occurs. Maternal abnormalities that can affect a prenatal screening test result include disorders that affect the size and metabolism of DNA, such as B12 deficiency, autoimmune disease, and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Similarly, maternal tumors, both benign and malignant, can release DNA fragments that contain duplications or deletions. Bioinformatics algorithms can subsequently interpret the raw sequencing data incorrectly, resulting in false-positive test reports of fetal monosomies or test failures. Maternal sex-chromosome abnormalities, both constitutional and somatic, can generate results that are discordant with fetal ultrasound examination or karyotype. Maternal copy-number variants and mosaicism for autosomal aneuploidies can also skew interpretation. A maternal etiology should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis of prenatal cell-free DNA test failures, false-positive and false-negative sequencing results. Further study is needed regarding the clinical utility of reporting maternal incidental findings.