Efficiency of prenatal diagnosis in Pierre Robin sequence

The Family Impact of a Robin Sequence Prenatal Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

Assess the impact of prenatal diagnosis of Robin sequence (RS) on parental experience during gestation and early infancy.

DESIGN

Prospective case-control study. An online survey was administered via email to 44 parents representing 34 unique patients with RS.

PARTICIPANTS

Parents of children diagnosed with RS and who received mandibular distraction at our tertiary care children's hospital. Participants were separated by the timing of RS diagnosis into prenatal and control postnatal groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Effects of timing of diagnosis on parents' preparation, caregiver support, education about the condition, stress, and overall mental health.

RESULTS

Complete responses were received from 44 parents representing 34 unique patients (50% response rate): prenatal, n = 17; postnatal, n = 27. Prenatal diagnosis improved parents' satisfaction regarding time to prepare for treatment (P = .001), stress of uncertainty about their child's health (P = .018), and stress about the operation(s) their child would need (P = .001). Both the prenatal (82%) and postnatal (78%) groups reported a negative impact on mental health based on diagnosis timing. All parents in the prenatal group preferred having received a prenatal diagnosis and the majority of the postnatal group (85%) would have preferred to have received the diagnosis prenatally.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal diagnosis of RS provided tangible benefits for parents by allowing them to mentally prepare, make plans for delivery and treatment, and become educated about the condition. Parents in both groups reported a negative impact on their mental health based on diagnosis timing and the majority of parents consistently preferred prenatal diagnosis.

Prenatal diagnosis of Treacher Collins syndrome: A case report and literature review

Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) should be suspected if the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and posterior cleft palate, and deformed external ears are observed during prenatal ultrasonography, excepting Pierre Robin sequence. Visualization of the fetal zygomatic bone and down-slanting palpebral fissures are conducive to differentiation. Molecular genetics testing can establish a definite diagnosis. A 28-year-old pregnant Chinese woman was referred for systematic ultrasound examination at 24 weeks. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound showed polyhydramnios, micrognathia, absence of nasal bone, microtia, secondary cleft palate, mandibular hypoplasia, glossoptosis, and normal limbs and vertebrae. Pierre Robin sequence was misdiagnosed with the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and posterior cleft palate. Final diagnosis of TCS was confirmed by whole-exome sequencing. Visualization of the fetal zygomatic bone and down-slanting palpebral fissures can facilitate a differential diagnosis between Pierre Robin sequence and TCS, with the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and posterior cleft palate.

Fetal Profile Markers for the Detection of Robin Sequence in Fetuses with Retrognathia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the prefrontal space ratio (PSFR), inferior facial (IFA) and maxilla-nasion-mandible angle (MNM), and the fetal profile line (FPL) are helpful in identifying fetuses with Robin sequence (RS) in cases with isolated retrognathia, and thus better predict the likelihood of immediate need for postnatal respiratory support.

METHODS

This was a retrospective matched case-control study of fetuses/infants with isolated retrognathia with or without RS receiving pre- and postnatal treatment at the University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany between 2008 and 2020. The PFSR, IFA, MNM, and FPL were measured in affected and normal fetuses according to standardized protocols. Cases were stratified into isolated retrognathia and RS.

RESULTS

21 (n=7 isolated retrognathia, n=14 RS) affected fetuses and 252 normal fetuses were included. Their median gestational age at ultrasound examination was 23.6 and 24.1 weeks, respectively. In fetuses with isolated retrognathia and RS, the PSFR, IFA, and FPL were significantly different from the normal population. At a false-positive rate of 5%, the detection rate was 76.2% for the PFSR, 85.7% for the IFA, and 90.5% for both parameters combined. However, all parameters failed to distinguish between isolated retrognathia and RS.

CONCLUSION

PSFR and IFA are simple markers for identifying retrognathia prenatally. However, they are not helpful for the detection of RS in fetuses with isolated retrognathia. Therefore, delivery should take place in a center experienced with RS and potentially life-threatening airway obstruction immediately after birth.

Genetics of craniofacial malformations

The field of craniofacial malformations is comprehensive and does not allow to discuss all craniofacial malformations which have been described as single entities. Many of the syndromes with craniofacial malformations are ultrarare. In this review we have chosen craniofacial malformation syndromes which are of relevance for the pediatrician, especially neonatologist: different types of craniosynostoses, oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum, Pierre Robin sequence and Treacher Collins syndrome. These syndromes will be described in detail. Diagnostic and therapeutic options will be discussed.

Fetal markers for the detection of infants with craniofacial malformation

Facial clefts and Robin sequence (RS) share the timing of the diagnosis during the course of pregnancy, their association with genetic diseases and the subsequent management following the initial diagnosis. If a suspicion of a facial cleft or RS is made, a detailed anatomical examination of the fetus should be carried out to identify further anomalies. This may also involve genetic testing including a microarray or an exome analysis. Interdisciplinary counseling, including pre- and postnatal experts with sufficient experience in the management of such neonates, should be involved in this counseling. Parents should be informed about disease-specific therapeutic options and postnatal outcome. Delivery should take place in a center with experience in craniofacial malformations where clinicians are prepared for potentially life-threatening airway obstruction immediately after birth.

Epidemiology of Pierre-Robin sequence in Europe: A population-based EUROCAT study

BACKGROUND

Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a rare congenital anomaly. Respiratory disorders and feeding difficulties represent the main burden.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of PRS using a cohort of cases from EUROCAT, the European network of population-based registries of congenital anomalies.

METHODS

We analysed cases of PRS born in the period 1998-2017 collected by 29 population-based congenital anomaly registries in 17 different countries. We calculated prevalence estimates, prenatal detection rate, survival up to 1 week, and proportions of associated anomalies. The effect of maternal age was tested using a Poisson regression model.

RESULTS

Out of 11 669 155 surveyed births, a total of 1294 cases of PRS were identified. The estimate of the overall prevalence was 12.0 per 100 000 births (95% CI 9.9, 14.5). There was a total of 882 (68.2%) isolated cases, and the prevalence was 7.8 per 100 000 births (95% CI 6.7, 9.2). A total of 250 cases (19.3%) were associated with other structural congenital anomalies, 77 cases (6.0%) were associated with chromosomal anomalies and 77 (6.0%) with genetic syndromes. The prenatal detection rate in isolated cases was 12.0% (95% CI 9.8, 14.5) and increased to 16.0% (95% CI 12.7, 19.7) in the sub-period 2008-2017. The prevalence rate ratio of non-chromosomal cases with maternal age ≥35 was higher than in cases with maternal age <25 for total (PRR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05, 1.51) and isolated cases (PRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.00, 1.64). Survival of chromosomal cases (94.2%) and multiple anomaly cases (95.3%) were lower than survival of isolated cases (99.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This epidemiological study using a large series of cases of PRS provides insights into the epidemiological profile of PRS in Europe. We observed an association with higher maternal age, but further investigations are needed to test potential risk factors for PRS.

Treatment of infants with craniofacial malformations

Infants with craniofacial malformations (CFMs) are at increased risk of various clinical problems, including respiratory and feeding disorders, the result of which may be long-lasting. An improvement in clinical care can be achieved by prenatal diagnosis and interdisciplinary birth preparation. Feeding problems may particularly be stressful for the family and require a team approach involving nursing staff, speech therapists and nutritional specialists to anticipate, avoid and treat sequelae such as failure to thrive or recurrent aspirations. Special techniques (eg, optimisation of breast feeding, alternative feeding methods or manual orofacial therapy) may be used individually to improve feeding competence; supplemental nutrition via a nasogastric or gastrostomy tube may be temporarily necessary to ensure adequate weight gain. The high prevalence of respiratory disorders in infants with craniofacial abnormalities requires anticipation and screening to prevent growth failure and neurological deficits. Treatment of upper airway obstruction varies widely, strategies can be divided into non-surgical and surgical, and in those aimed at widening the pharyngeal space (eg, prone position, palatal plates, craniofacial surgery) and those bridging the narrow upper airway (eg, nasopharyngeal airway, modified palatal plate, pneumatic airway stenting, tracheostomy). The complex management of an infant with CFM should be performed by a multidisciplinary team to offer specialised support and care for affected families.

Mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly: An expansion of the phenotype via parental survey

Mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly (MFDM) is due to haploinsufficiency of spliceosomal GTPase EFTUD2. Features include microcephaly, craniofacial dysmorphology, developmental disability, and other anomalies. We surveyed parents of individuals with MFDM to expand knowledge about health, development, and parental concerns. Participants included attendees of the inaugural MFDM family conference in June 2019 and members of the MFDM online group. To explore MFDM variable expressivity, we offered targeted Sanger sequencing for untested parents. Forty-seven parents participated in the survey. 59% of individuals with MFDM were male, with mean age 6.4 years (range 8 months to 49 years). Similar to the literature (n = 123), common features include microcephaly, cleft palate, choanal stenosis, tracheoesophageal fistula, heart problems, and seizures. New information includes airway intervention details, age-based developmental outcomes, rate of vision refractive errors, and lower incidences of prematurity and IUGR. Family concerns focused on development, communication, and increased support. Targeted Sanger sequencing for families of seven individuals demonstrated de novo variants, for a total of 91.9% de novo EFTUD2 variants (n = 34/37). This study reports the largest single cohort of individuals with MFDM, expands phenotypic spectrum and inheritance patterns, improves understanding of developmental outcomes and care needs, and identifies development as the biggest concern for parents.

The Hypoplasic Mandible: What Makes it Different From the Healthy Child?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the morphology of the hypoplasic mandible and its evolution during the growth period to better understand how it differs from the pediatric healthy mandible.

METHOD

Three-dimensional mandibular models of hypoplasic and healthy children aged from 39 gestational weeks to 7 years old were analyzed with a morphometric method including data clustering. Morphological distinctions between pathological and healthy mandibles were highlighted. Bilateral and unilateral mandibular hypoplasia were distinguished.

RESULTS

The study sample was composed of 31 hypoplasic children and as many sex- and age-matched healthy children. Morphological distinctions between pathological and healthy mandibles were highlighted only from the first year of life. In bilateral hypoplasia, the overall mandibular dimensions were reduced while there was only a ramus asymmetry in unilateral mandibular hypoplasia (mean ± SD of the difference between the Grp03c and Grp03b subgroups: 6.80 ± 6.37 - P value = 1.64e^-3 for the height of the left ramus versus 0.18 ± 4.18 - P value = .82 for the height of the right ramus). Supervised classification trees were built to identify the pathology and discriminate unilateral from bilateral mandibular hypoplasia (prediction rates = 81% and 84%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a morphometric analysis, we demonstrated that mandibular hypoplasia significantly impacts the mandibular morphology only from the first year of life, with a distinction between bilateral and unilateral hypoplasia.

Can Robin Sequence Be Predicted From Prenatal Ultrasonography?

PURPOSE

Prenatal diagnosis of Robin sequence (RS) could promote safe delivery and improve perinatal care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between prenatal ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies for assessing micrognathia to determine if US alone can be used to reliably screen for RS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of fetuses evaluated in the Advanced Fetal Care Center at Boston Children's Hospital from 2002 to 2017. To be included, 1) prenatal MRI and US must have been performed during the same visit, 2) the infant must have been live-born, and 3) the diagnosis must have been confirmed postnatally. Patients with images of inadequate quality for analysis were excluded. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on postnatal diagnosis: 1) RS (micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction) (RS group), 2) micrognathia without RS (micrognathia group), 3) cleft lip and palate (CLP) without micrognathia (CLP group), and 4) gestational age-matched controls with normal craniofacial morphology (control group). The inferior facial angle (IFA) was measured using both imaging modalities and compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves were applied to identify a threshold for the diagnosis of RS from US. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and odds ratio were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were included (mean gestational age at imaging, 24.9 ± 5.2 weeks), with 25 in the RS group (26.6%), 29 in the micrognathia group (30.9%), 23 in the CLP group (24.5%), and 17 in the control group (18.1%). The IFA was significantly smaller in the RS group than in all other groups on both US and MRI (P < .001). A moderate correlation was found between IFA measurements on US and MRI (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.729). An IFA threshold on US of 45.5° maximized sensitivity (84%) and specificity (81%) for the diagnosis of RS.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest incorporating the IFA into routine prenatal US and referring patients for confirmatory MRI when the US IFA is lower than 45.5°.

Prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia in 41 fetuses: Retrospective analysis of outcome and genetic etiologies

Fetal micrognathia can be detected early in pregnancy. Prognosis of micrognathia depends on the risk of respiratory distress at birth and on the long-term risk of intellectual disability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term prognosis of fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia by estimating the prevalence and the severity of confirmed genetic diagnosis in our cohort. Our retrospective study included 41 fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia referred to the multidisciplinary centers for prenatal diagnosis in Nice and Marseille, France, between 2006 and 2016. Fetal micrognathia was associated with cleft palate in 27 cases. A genetic cause was confirmed in 21 cases (67%). A chromosomal abnormality was present in 12 cases, including three copy-number variations diagnosed by array CGH. Monogenic disorders were identified in nine cases, most often after birth. Fetuses with family history of micrognathia or Pierre Robin sequence had a favorable outcome. Prognosis was good for the fetuses without associated findings and normal chromosomal analysis, with the exception of one case with a postnatal diagnosis of mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly. Prognostic was poor for the fetuses with additional ultrasound anomalies, as only 5 out of 28 children had a good outcome. Prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia is an indicator of a possible fetal pathology justifying multidisciplinary management. Our study confirms the necessity of performing prenatal array CGH. Use of high-throughput gene sequencing in prenatal period could improve diagnostic performance, prenatal counseling, and adequate postnatal care.