Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis: Expanded NIPT that includes conditions other than trisomies 13, 18, and 21 should be offered

Performance of Massive Parallel Sequencing-Based Cell-Free DNA Testing in Compromised Pregnancies

Background/Objectives: Non-Invasive prenatal test (NIPT) is used as a universal or contingent test after prior risk assessment. Screening is mainly performed for common trisomies (T21, T13, T18), although other chromosomal anomalies may be detected. Our objective was to study the performance of GWNIPT in the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancies in which an invasive prenatal study was performed and in early pregnancy losses, in comparison with the reference test. Method: VeriSeqTM NIPT Solution v2, a genome-wide NIPT (GWNIPT), was performed prior to invasive testing in fetal diagnostic study cases (FDS, n = 155) and in early pregnancy losses (EPL, n = 68). Results: In the FDS group, the diagnostic test (QFPCR, array and karyotype) detected anomalies in 32 pregnancies (21%), in twenty of them (61%) also detected by GWNIPT. Eleven of the twelve cases undetected by GWNIPT were balanced translocations (n = 4) or deletions/duplications <7 Mb (n = 7). In the EPL group, GWNIPT detected anomalies in 46% of cases (31/68) but comparison with reference test (QFPCR and karyotype) in products of conception (POC) was only possible in 18 cases. Concordant results between POC and GWNIPT test were obtained in 16 of the 18 cases. In EPL, with GWNIPT testing, common trisomies accounted for 25.8% of cases (8/31), rare trisomies 54.8% (17/31) and microdeletions/duplications 16.1% (5/31). Conclusions: The GWNIPT test may be useful in clinical practice in prenatal and in EPL's genetic diagnosis when the appropriate sample is not available.

Targeted Linked-Read Sequencing for Direct Haplotype Phasing of Parental GJB2/SLC26A4 Alleles: A Universal and Dependable Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis Method Applied to Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss in At-Risk Families

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL) has been rarely reported until recent years. Additionally, the existing method can not be used for challenging genome loci (eg, copy number variations, deletions, inversions, or gene recombinants) or on families without proband genotype. This study assessed the performance of relative haplotype dosage analysis (RHDO)-based NIPD for identifying fetal genotyping in pregnancies at risk of ARNSHL. Fifty couples carrying pathogenic variants associated with ARNSHL in either GJB2 or SLC26A4 were recruited. The RHDO-based targeted linked-read sequencing combined with whole gene coverage probes was used to genotype the fetal cell-free DNA of 49 families who met the quality control standard. Fetal amniocyte samples were genotyped using invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) to assess the performance of NIPD. The NIPD results showed 100% (49/49) concordance with those obtained through IPD. Two families with copy number variation and recombination were also successfully identified. Sufficient specific informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms for haplotyping, as well as the fetal cell-free DNA concentration and sequencing depth, are prerequisites for RHDO-based NIPD. This method has the merits of covering the entire genes of GJB2 and SLC26A4, qualifying for copy number variation and recombination analysis with remarkable sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it has clinical potential as an alternative to traditional IPD for ARNSHL.

Postmortem imaging of fetuses at early gestations: A comparison of microfocus computed tomography with postmortem magnetic resonance at 9.4 T and postmortem ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of postmortem ultrasound (PMUS), 9.4 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) for the examination of early gestation fetuses.

METHOD

Eight unselected fetuses (10-15 weeks gestational age) underwent at least 2 of the 3 listed imaging examinations. Six fetuses underwent 9.4 T MRI, four underwent micro-CT and six underwent PMUS. All operators were blinded to clinical history. All imaging was reported according to a prespecified template assessing 36 anatomical structures, later grouped into five regions: brain, thorax, heart, abdomen and genito-urinary.

RESULTS

More anatomical structures were seen on 9.4 T MRI and micro-CT than with PMUS, with a combined frequency of identified structures of 91.9% and 69.7% versus 54.5% and 59.6 (p < 0.001; p < 0.05) respectively according to comparison groups. In comparison with 9.4 T MRI, more structures were seen on micro-CT (90.2% vs. 83.3%, p < 0.05). Anatomical structures were described as abnormal on PMUS in 2.7%, 9.4 T MRI in 6.1% and micro-CT 7.7% of all structures observed. However, the accuracy test could not be calculated because conventional autopsy was performed on 6 fetuses of that only one structure was abnormal.

CONCLUSION

Micro-CT appears to offer the greatest potential as an imaging adjunct or non-invasive alternative for conventional autopsies in early gestation fetuses.

Comparison of the performance of NIPT and NIPT-plus for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy and high Z-score increases the positive predictive value

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT-plus) for detecting aneuploidies at different sequencing depths and assess Z-score accuracy in predicting trisomies 21, 18, 13, 45X, and 47XXX.

METHODS

Pregnancies with positive NIPT or NIPT-plus results detected at the prenatal diagnosis center of Nanfang Hospital were included in this retrospective study, between January 2017 and December 2022. Invasive prenatal diagnostic results were collected. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the relationship between Z-score and positive predictive value (PPV). Optimal cut-off values were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, and PPVs were calculated in different groups.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1348 pregnant women with positive results, including 930 reported by NIPT and 418 reported by NIPT-plus. NIPT reported significantly more rare chromosomal aneuploidies (RCAs), and NIPT-plus had a significantly higher PPV for trisomy 21 (T21). Logistic regression analyses showed a significant association (P < 0.001) between Z-score and PPVs for T21 and trisomy 18 (T18). A linear relationship was observed between fetal fraction (FF) and Z-values in the true positive cases of T21 and T18.The high Z-score group had significantly higher PPVs than the low Z-score group for T21, T18, trisomy 13, and 47XXX, but not for 45X.

CONCLUSION

The Z-score is helpful in assessing NIPT or NIPT-plus results. Therefore, we suggest including the Z-score and FF in the results. By combining the Z-score, FF, and maternal age, clinicians can interpret NIPT results more accurately and improve personal counsel to reduce patients' anxiety.

Caution with noninvasive prenatal screening for single gene disorders: A case report of a COL1A1 variant in osteogenesis imperfecta

What is already known?

What does this study add?

A rapid PCR-free next-generation sequencing method for comprehensive diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes in prenatal samples

The aim of this study is to investigate the application performance of rapid copy number variation sequencing (rCNV-seq) technology for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities during prenatal diagnosis. Samples were collected from 424 pregnant women who were at high-risk for noninvasive prenatal screening in Kunming Maternal and Child Care Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022. rCNV-seq technique was used to detect fetal chromosome abnormalities and compare the results with that of chromosomal karyotype analysis. The Result showed that 330 (77.83%, 330/424) cases indicated chromosomal abnormalities among 424 high-risk pregnant women who underwent rCNV-seq. Moreover, 94 (22.17%, 94/424) cases were discovered to have copy number variations. Among the 330 fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities, common autosomal aneuploidy was observed in 203 cases (47.87%, 203/424) and sex chromosome aneuploidy was observed in 91 cases (21.46%, 91/424). Moreover, the abnormalities in multiple chromosomes were discovered in 33 cases (7.78%, 33/424), and the rare autosomal aneuploidy was observed in 3 cases (0.71%, 3/424). There were 63 fetuses (14.86%, 63/424) with pathogenic CNVs among the 94 fetuses with variable copy numbers. Of the 245 pregnant women who voluntarily selected G-band karyotyping, 1 fetus with copy number variation had normal karyotype results, and the remaining women were consistent with rCNV-seq. Our study revealed that rCNV-seq has higher accuracy in detecting common trisomy and can also detect chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications that cannot be detected by G-banding karyotype analysis. There is no effective treatment for chromosomal diseases, so it is particularly important to prevent chromosomal diseases through genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal diseases.

Performance Evaluation of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Screening Chromosome Disorders: A Single-Center Observational Study of 15,304 Consecutive Cases in China

Objective

This study was to evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting fetal chromosome disorders in pregnant women.

Methods

From October 1st, 2017, to December 31th, 2022, a total of 15,304 plasma cell free DNA-NIPT samples were collected for fetal chromosome disorders screening. The results of NIPT were validated by confirmatory invasive testing or clinical outcome follow-up. Further, NIPT performance between low-risk and high-risk groups, as well as singleton pregnancy and twin pregnancy groups was compared. Besides, analysis of 111 false-positive cases was performed.

Results

Totally, NIPT was performed on 15,086 eligible venous blood samples, of which 179 (1.19%) showed positive NIPT results and 68 were further validated to be true positive samples via confirmatory invasive testing or follow-up of clinical outcomes. For common chromosome aneuploidies, sex chromosome abnormalities (SCA) and other chromosomal aneuploidies, the detection sensitivities of NIPT were all 100%, the specificities were 99.87%, 99.70%, and 99.68% and the positive predictive values (PPVs) were 65.45%, 31.82%, and 10.91%, respectively. No statistically significant variance in detection performance was observed among 2987 high-risk and 12,099 low-risk subjects, as well as singleton and twin pregnancy subjects. The concentration of cell-free fetal DNA of 111 false-positive cases ranged from 5.5% to 33.7%, which was higher than the minimum requirement of NIPT.

Conclusion

With stringent protocol, NIPT shows high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fetal chromosome disorders in a large-scale clinical service, helping improving overall pregnancy management.

First Trimester Contingent Screening for Aneuploidies with Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Singleton Pregnancies - a Swiss Single Centre Experience

Introduction

Switzerland was amongst the first countries to offer cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing covered by the health insurance to pregnant women with a risk ≥ 1:1000 for trisomies at first trimester combined screening (FTCS). The aim of this study is to evaluate the implementation of this contingent model in a single tertiary referral centre and its effect on gestational age at diagnosing trisomy 21.

Materials and Methods

Between July 2015 and December 2020 all singleton pregnancies at 11-14 weeks of gestation without major fetal malformation were included and stratified according to their risk at FTCS. Statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad Version 9.1 for Windows.

Results

4424 pregnancies were included. Of 166 (3.8%) pregnancies with a NT ≥ 3.5 mm and/or a risk ≥ 1:10 at FCTS, 130 (78.3%) opted for direct invasive testing. 803 (18.2%) pregnancies had an intermediate risk, 692 (86.2%) of them opted for cffDNA first. 3455 (78.1%) pregnancies had a risk < 1:1000. 63 fetuses were diagnosed with trisomy 21, 47 (74.6%) directly by invasive procedures after FTCS, 16 (25.4%) by cffDNA first.

Conclusions

Most women choose cffDNA or invasive testing as second tier according to national guidelines. Despite the delay associated with cffDNA testing after FCTS, 75% of all trisomy 21 are still diagnosed in the first trimester with this contingent screening model.

Assessment of Amniotic Fluid Volume in Pregnancy

Amniotic fluid (AF) is an integral part of the fetal environment and is essential for fetal growth and development. Pathways of AF recirculation include the fetal lungs, swallowing, absorption through the fetal gastrointestinal tract, excretion through fetal urine production, and movement. In addition to being a marker for fetal health, adequate AF is necessary for fetal lung development, growth, and movement. The role of diagnostic imaging is to provide a detailed fetal survey, placental evaluation, and clinical correlation with maternal conditions to help identify causes of AF abnormalities and thereby enable specific therapy. Oligohydramnios prompts evaluation for fetal growth restriction as well as genitourinary issues, including renal agenesis, multicystic dysplastic kidneys, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, and bladder outlet obstruction. Premature preterm rupture of membranes should also be clinically excluded as a cause of oligohydramnios. Clinical trials evaluating amnioinfusion are underway as a potential intervention for renal causes of oligohydramnios. Most cases of polyhydramnios are idiopathic, with maternal diabetes being a common cause. Polyhydramnios prompts evaluation for fetal gastrointestinal obstruction and oropharyngeal or thoracic masses, as well as neurologic or musculoskeletal anomalies. Amnioreduction is performed only for maternal indications such as symptomatic polyhydramnios causing maternal respiratory distress. Polyhydramnios with fetal growth restriction is paradoxical and can occur with maternal diabetes and hypertension. When these maternal conditions are absent, this raises concern for aneuploidy. The authors describe the pathways of AF production and circulation, US and MRI assessment of AF, disease-specific disruption of AF pathways, and an algorithmic approach to AF abnormalities. ^©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Position statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis on the use of non-invasive prenatal testing for the detection of fetal chromosomal conditions in singleton pregnancies

What is already known about this topic?

What does this study add?

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for "Non-Medical" Traits: Ensuring Consistency in Ethical Decision-Making

The scope of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) could expand in the future to include detailed analysis of the fetal genome. This will allow for the testing for virtually any trait with a genetic contribution, including "non-medical" traits. Here we discuss the potential use of NIPT for these traits. We outline a scenario which highlights possible inconsistencies with ethical decision-making. We then discuss the case against permitting these uses. The objections include practical problems; increasing inequities; increasing the burden of choice; negative impacts on the child, family, and society; and issues with implementation. We then outline the case for permitting the use of NIPT for these traits. These include arguments for reproductive liberty and autonomy; questioning the labeling of traits as "non-medical"; and the principle of procreative beneficence. This summary of the case for and against can serve as a basis for the development of a consistent and coherent ethical framework.

Screen-positive rate in cell-free DNA screening for microdeletion 22q11.2

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of the fetal fraction (FF) on the screen-positive rate in screening for microdeletion 22q11.2.

METHODS

This study is based on samples that were analyzed using the Harmony® Prenatal Test (Roche Inc). The study cohort comprised samples from women with singleton pregnancies who were at least 16 years old and at least at 11 weeks' gestation. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant covariates that carry an impact on the screen-positive rate.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 52,019 pregnancies, including 309 pregnancies with a high-risk result for microdeletion 22q11.2. Thus, the overall screen-positive rate was 0.59%. In the low-risk group, the FF was 10.1%, and in the high-risk group, it was 7.3%. Regression analysis indicated a strong correlation between the FF and the screen-positive rate. In the cases with an FF of <11.0%, the screen-positive rate was 0.92%, while it was 0.13% in the group with a higher FF.

CONCLUSION

The screen-positive rate depends on the FF. In order to keep the rate low, we recommend restricting the analysis to samples with a FF of 11% and more.

Fetal anomaly diagnosis and termination of pregnancy

The aim of this review was to discuss bioethics in prenatal diagnosis and health care after recent legislative and judicial changes affecting reproductive rights, such as the repeal of 'Roe v. Wade' in the United States. We recognize that abortion involves particular moralities that are not universal or shared by all cultures, groups, and individuals. We reviewed the historical aspects of embryology and personhood, fetal morbidity and mortality, and parental options for prenatal diagnostic testing. We examined relevant ethical issues including informed consent, the emergence of fetal pain, reproductive autonomy, the fiduciary responsibilities of pregnant mothers, and the obligations of physicians caring for the maternal-fetal dyad. The code of medical ethics includes respect for decisional privacy and the protection of information shared in confidence. When a fetal anomaly is diagnosed, pregnant mothers must be informed about the risks, burdens, and alternatives in either continuing or terminating the pregnancy. Parental choice should include the right to refuse testing, the informed choice not to know about certain genetic test results, and the right to make informed decisions about the best interests of the future child. In the diagnosis and care of fetal anomalies, moral dilemmas arise. Before fetal viability, the mother's autonomy, sense of beneficence, and personal values should be trusted and respected. Perinatal palliative care should be available to pregnant mothers whose anomalous fetus is carried to birth.

Inclusion of sex chromosomes in noninvasive prenatal testing in Asia, Australia, Europe and the USA: A survey study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent to which sex chromosomes are included in current noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and the reporting practices with respect to fetal chromosomal sex and sex chromosome aberrations (SCAs), in addition to an update on the general implementation of NIPT.

METHOD

A questionnaire addressing the research objectives was distributed by email to fetal medicine and clinical genetics experts in Asia, Australia, Europe and the USA.

RESULTS

Guidelines on NIPT are available in the majority of the included countries. Not all existing guidelines address reporting of fetal chromosomal sex and SCAs. In most settings, NIPT frequently includes sex chromosomes (five Australian states, China, Hong Kong, Israel, Singapore, Thailand, USA and 23 of 31 European countries). This occurs most often by default or when parents wish to know fetal sex. In most settings, a potential SCA is reported by stating the risk hereof as "low" or "high" and/or by naming the SCA. Less than 50% of all pregnant women receive NIPT according to respondents from three Australian states, China, Israel, Singapore, Thailand and 24 of 31 European countries. However, this percentage, the genomic coverage of NIPT and its application as primary or secondary screening vary by setting.

CONCLUSION

In most of the studied countries/states, NIPT commonly includes sex chromosomes. The reporting practices concerning fetal chromosomal sex and SCAs are diverse and most commonly not addressed by guidelines. In general, NIPT is variably implemented across countries/states.

Ethical issues associated with prenatal screening using non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidy

Prenatal screening for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) is increasingly available through expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). NIPT for SCAs raises complex ethical issues for clinical providers, prospective parents and future children. This paper discusses the ethical issues that arise around NIPT for SCAs and current guidelines and protocols for management. The first section outlines current practice and the limitations of NIPT for SCAs. It then outlines key guidelines before discussing the ethical issues raised by this use of NIPT. We conclude that while screening for SCAs should be made available for people seeking to use NIPT, its implementation requires careful consideration of what, when and how information is provided to users.

Performance of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies and copy number variations: A prospective study from a single center in Jiangxi province, China

To evaluate the performance of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (expanded noninvasive prenatal testing, NIPT-Plus) in screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities includes aneuploidies and copy number variations, a total of 23,116 pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy were recruited for NIPT-Plus. Screening positive results were verified by karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis after amniocentesis. A total of 264 pregnancies (1.14%) were positive results as predicted by NIPT-Plus, including 233 aneuploidies and 31 copy number variations. Following genetic counseling, 233 (88.26%) pregnant women underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and 136 were verified as true positives, comprising 72 common trisomies (T21, T18, T13), 47 sex chromosomal abnormalities two rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and 15 copy number variations The positive predictive value for common trisomies, SCAs, RATs and CNVs were 68.57%, 68.12%, 6.67% and 51.72%, respectively. Pregnant women with screen-positive results for common trisomies have higher rates of invasive prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy termination than those with positive results for SCAs, RATs, and CNVs. NIPT-Plus showed a good performance in detecting common trisomies, SCAs and also contributed to detecting pathogenic CNVs, but higher accuracy was required in the detection of RATs. In summary, this study provides a reference for the clinical application of NIPT-Plus for screening fetal chromosomal abnormalities in this region. Therefore, we suggest that NIPT-Plus could be widely used in clinical screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities in combination with prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling.

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders with enhanced relative haplotype dosage analysis for diagnostic implementation

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of single-gene disorders (SGD-NIPD) has been widely accepted, but is mostly limited to the exclusion of either paternal or de novo mutations. Indeed, it is still difficult to infer the inheritance of the maternal allele from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. Based on the study of maternal haplotype imbalance in cfDNA, relative haplotype dosage (RHDO) was developed to address this challenge. Although RHDO has been shown to be reliable, robust control of statistical error and explicit delineation of critical parameters for assessing the quality of the analysis have not been fully addressed. We present here a universal and adaptable enhanced-RHDO (eRHDO) procedure through an automated bioinformatics pipeline with a didactic visualization of the results, aiming to be applied for any SGD-NIPD in routine care. A training cohort of 43 families carrying CFTR, NF1, DMD, or F8 mutations allowed the characterization and optimal setting of several adjustable data variables, such as minimum sequencing depth, type 1 and type 2 statistical errors, as well as the quality assessment of intermediate steps and final results by block score and concordance score. Validation was successfully performed on a test cohort of 56 pregnancies. Finally, computer simulations were used to estimate the effect of fetal-fraction, sequencing depth and number of informative SNPs on the quality of results. Our workflow proved to be robust, as we obtained conclusive and correctly inferred fetal genotypes in 94.9% of cases, with no false-negative or false-positive results. By standardizing data generation and analysis, we fully describe a turnkey protocol for laboratories wishing to offer eRHDO-based non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders as an alternative to conventional prenatal diagnosis.

Cell-Free Fetal DNA and Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomopathies and Pediatric Monogenic Diseases: A Critical Appraisal and Medicolegal Remarks

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) analysis is a non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test with a fundamental role for the screening of chromosomic or monogenic pathologies of the fetus. Its administration is performed by fetal DNA detection in the mother's blood from the fourth week of gestation. Given the great interest regarding its validation as a diagnostic tool, the authors have set out to undertake a critical appraisal based on a wide-ranging narrative review of 45 total studies centered around such techniques. Both chromosomopathies and monogenic diseases were taken into account and systematically discussed and elucidated. Not surprisingly, cell-free fetal DNA analysis for screening purposes is already rather well-established. At the same time, considerable interest in its diagnostic value has emerged from this literature review, which recommends the elaboration of appropriate validation studies, as well as a broad discourse, involving all stakeholders, to address the legal and ethical complexities that such techniques entail.

Experiences of pregnant women with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing in a national screening program

Pregnant women’s perspectives should be included in the dialogue surrounding the expanding offers of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), especially now that technological possibilities are rapidly increasing. This study evaluated women’s experiences with the offer of genome-wide (GW) first-tier NIPT in a national screening program. A nationwide pre-and post-test questionnaire was completed by 473 pregnant women choosing between targeted NIPT (trisomies 21, 18 and 13 only) and GW-NIPT (also other findings) within the Dutch TRIDENT-2 study. Measures included satisfaction, reasons for or against choosing GW-NIPT, anxiety, and opinion on the future scope of NIPT. Most respondents (90.4%) were glad to have been offered the choice between GW-NIPT and targeted NIPT; 76.5% chose GW-NIPT. Main reasons to choose GW-NIPT were ‘wanting as much information as possible regarding the child’s health’ (38.6%) and ‘to be prepared for everything’ (23.8%). Main reasons to choose targeted NIPT were ‘avoiding uncertain results/outcomes’ (33.7%) and ‘not wanting to unnecessarily worry’ (32.6%). Nearly all respondents received a low-risk NIPT result (98.7%). No differences were found in anxiety between women choosing GW-NIPT and targeted NIPT. Most respondents were favorable toward future prenatal screening for a range of conditions, including life-threatening disorders, mental disabilities, disorders treatable in pregnancy and severe physical disabilities, regardless of their choice for GW-NIPT or targeted NIPT. In conclusion, women who chose first-tier NIPT were satisfied with the choice between GW-NIPT and targeted NIPT, and most women were favorable toward a broader future screening offer. Our results contribute to the debate concerning the expansion of NIPT.

Health professionals and scientists' views on genome-wide NIPT in the French public health system: Critical analysis of the ethical issues raised by prenatal genomics

In France, since January 2020, laboratories have started to make available genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (GW-NIPT) beyond the three common trisomies (T21, T13 and T18) at the same cost as standard NIPT. With the possible margins for interpretation of the legal framework and in the absence of clear and updated guidelines, health professionals are left with questions about which type of screening offer may be clinically responsible, morally appropriate, and, at the same time, respectful of women’s values and ability to make autonomous choices. The aim of this study is to provide an analysis and understanding of the challenging dimensions of clinical practices in the context of evolving scientific knowledge and techniques in prenatal genomics. In this article, we develop a critical analysis of the arguments and concerns that emerge around the offer of expanded NIPT and are discussed by health professionals and scientists. To achieve this, we conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 17 health professionals and scientists from September 2021 to February 2022 and a comprehensive literature review (regulatory, scientific, medical, institutional sources). The results of our empirical research highlight the importance of addressing ethical issues related to the differing quality of counselling, the complexity of achieving informed consent, and the avoidance of harm to pregnant women in the feedback of findings beyond T21, T18 and T13. If there is an increase in the provision of GW-NIPT within the French public health system, it will be essential to promote medical practices that respect reproductive choices of women, support their autonomous decision and their understanding of the limitations and uncertainties associated with GW screening. Further research is required to provide an insight into women’s perceptions in order to refine our analysis from the patients’ perspective.

Patient experience with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a primary screen for aneuploidy in the Netherlands

Background

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a screening method for trisomy 21 and other chromosomal abnormalities has been adopted widely across the globe. However, while many clinical validation studies have been performed, less is known regarding the patient experience with NIPT. This study explored how individuals experience NIPT in a pre- and post-test setting, where NIPT is broadly available as a primary screening method with the option of reporting beyond common trisomies.

Methods

Participants were recruited using social media with a strategy designed to select individuals who had the option to have NIPT as part of the TRIDENT-2 study (In the Netherlands, NIPT is only available within the TRIDENT studies executed by the NIPT consortium. This research was done independently from the NIPT consortium.) in the Netherlands. The study used online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Both were developed around a patient experience framework consisting of seven themes: information, patient as active participant, responsiveness of services, lived experience, continuity of care and relationships, communication, and support.

Results

Overall, 4539 questionnaire responses were analyzed and 60% of the respondents had experienced NIPT. Of those, 1.7% received a high-risk result for trisomy or another chromosomal copy number variant (referred to as an “additional finding”). Overall, participants felt they had received sufficient information and had control over their decision regarding whether or not to choose NIPT. The vast majority of respondents who had NIPT were positive about their experience and would use it again. Those with results showing an increased probability for trisomy or additional findings were more likely to report negative feelings such as tension and anxiety, and less likely to feel that they had been sufficiently prepared for the implications of their results.

Conclusions

The patient experience with first-tier NIPT in the Netherlands was largely positive. Areas for improvement included counseling on the implications of screening and the different possible outcomes of NIPT, including additional findings that may be uncovered by expanding NIPT beyond the common trisomies. The experiences reported in this study may be useful for other countries intending to implement NIPT.

Video education about genetic privacy and patient perspectives about sharing prenatal genetic data: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Laboratories offering cell-free DNA often reserve the right to share prenatal genetic data for research or even commercial purposes, and obtain this permission on the patient consent form. Although it is known that nonpregnant patients are often reluctant to share their genetic data for research, pregnant patients' knowledge of, and opinions about, genetic data privacy are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether pregnant patients who had already undergone cell-free DNA screening were aware that genetic data derived from cell-free DNA may be shared for research. Furthermore, we examined whether pregnant patients exposed to video education about the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act-a federal law that mandates workplace and health insurance protections against genetic discrimination-were more willing to share cell-free DNA-related genetic data for research than pregnant patients who were unexposed.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04420858), English-speaking patients with singleton pregnancies who underwent cell-free DNA and subsequently presented at 17 0/7 to 23 6/7 weeks of gestation for a detailed anatomy scan were randomized 1:1 to a control or intervention group. Both groups viewed an infographic about cell-free DNA. In addition, the intervention group viewed an educational video about the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. The primary outcomes were knowledge about, and willingness to share, prenatal genetic data from cell-free DNA by commercial laboratories for nonclinical purposes, such as research. The secondary outcomes included knowledge about existing genetic privacy laws, knowledge about the potential for reidentification of anonymized genetic data, and acceptability of various use and sharing scenarios for prenatal genetic data. Eighty-one participants per group were required for 80% power to detect an increase in willingness to share data from 60% to 80% (α=0.05).

RESULTS

A total of 747 pregnant patients were screened, and 213 patients were deemed eligible and approached for potential study participation. Of these patients, 163 (76.5%) consented and were randomized; one participant discontinued the intervention, and two participants were excluded from analysis after the intervention when it was discovered that they did not fulfill all eligibility criteria. Overall, 160 (75.1%) of those approached were included in the final analysis. Most patients in the control group (72 [90.0%]) and intervention (76 [97.4%]) group were either unsure about or incorrectly thought that cell-free DNA companies could not share prenatal genetic data for research. Participants in the intervention group were more likely to incorrectly believe that their prenatal genetic data would not be shared for nonclinical purposes than participants in the control group (28.8% in the control group vs 46.2% in the intervention; P=.03). However, video education did not increase participant willingness to share genetic data in multiple scenarios. Non-White participants were less willing than White participants to allow sharing of genetic data specifically for academic research (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Most participants were unaware that their prenatal genetic data may be used for nonclinical purposes. Pregnant patients who were educated about the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act were not more willing to share genetic data than those who did not receive this education. Surprisingly, video education about the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act led patients to falsely believe that their data would not be shared for research, and participants who identified as racial minorities were less willing to share genetic data. New strategies are needed to improve pregnant patients' understanding of genetic privacy.

Clinical application of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a cohort of 39,580 pregnancies

The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT-plus) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in the second trimester (12-26 weeks). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 39,580 pregnancies with NIPT-plus. Screening positive cases were diagnosed with karyotyping and single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis (SNP array)/copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) with follow-up. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, and T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), and microdeletion and microduplication syndromes (MMS) by NIPT-plus were recorded. We assessed the predictive value of NIPT-plus based on maternal age and conventional indications. Of 39,580 pregnancies with NIPT-plus, 511 (1.3%) had prenatal screening positive results of fetal chromosome abnormality, of which 87.7% (448/511) had invasive prenatal diagnosis. NIPT-plus performed better in predicting fetal SCAs and chromosome aneuploidies for pregnancies with advanced maternal age (AMA) than young maternal age (YMA). Besides, the PPVs of T21, T13, and chromosome aneuploidies showed an upward trend when comparison was based on maternal age in 5-year subintervals. The termination rates of 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, and 47,XYY were 100% (11/11), 20.0% (3/15), 91.7% (22/24), and 7.1% (1/14) with postnatal follow-up. Last but not least, the PPV for MMS is 41.7% (30/72), which may have a positive correlation between the size of CNVs. Pregnant women with screen-positive results for common trisomies (T13, T18, and T21) were more willing to conduct invasive prenatal diagnosis compared to those with positive results for SCAs or MMS. However, the current study demonstrated SCAs and MMS had the lowest PPV. This highlights the importance of confirmatory prenatal diagnosis in those patients and the potential impact on genetic counseling and informative decision-making.

Initial Clinical Experience with NIPT for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies and Large Copy Number Variations

OBJECTIVE

Amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling and first trimester combined testing are able to screen for common trisomies 13, 18, and 21 and other atypical chromosomal anomalies (ACA). The most frequent atypical aberrations reported are rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAA) and copy number variations (CNV), which are deletions or duplications of various sizes. We evaluated the clinical outcome of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results positive for RAA and large CNVs to determine the clinical significance of these abnormal results.

METHODS

Genome-wide NIPT was performed on 3664 eligible patient samples at a single genetics center. For patients with positive NIPT reports, the prescribing physician was asked retrospectively to provide clinical follow-up information using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

RAAs and CNVs (>7 Mb) were detected in 0.5%, and 0.2% of tested cases, respectively. Follow up on pregnancies with an NIPT-positive result for RAA revealed signs of placental insufficiency or intra-uterine death in 50% of the cases and normal outcome at the time of birth in the other 50% of cases. We showed that CNV testing by NIPT allows for the detection of unbalanced translocations and relevant maternal health conditions.

CONCLUSION

NIPT for aneuploidies of all autosomes and large CNVs of at least 7 Mb has a low "non-reportable"-rate (<0.2%) and allows the detection of additional conditions of clinical significance.

Prenatal diagnosis of a likely pathogenic variant in ZBTB18: Natural evolution of fetal phenotype including the long bones and corpus callosum

Pathogenic variants in ZBTB18 gene have been described only postnatally with a variable phenotypic spectrum that includes intellectual disability, microcephaly, hypotonia, poor growth, corpus callosum abnormalities, seizures, and dysmorphic facial features. These features overlap with the phenotype of 1q43-q44 deletion syndrome (OMIM #612337). There are several genes within the 1q43-q44 deletion region, and ZBTB18 is of particular interest due to its known involvement in neuronal differentiation and migration. We describe here a fetus presenting with an intrauterine growth restriction, diminished long bones growth, single umbilical artery, and a short corpus callosum. On mid pregnancy ultrasound, all biometric parameters including the corpus callosum were relatively small but still within the normal range. Only a targeted follow-up during the third trimester, including neurosonographic and MRI exams, revealed the full extent of the malformation, leading to amniocentesis and a genetic workup that led to the identification of a de novo likely pathogenic variant in ZBTB18 gene. This is the first description of the evolving phenotype of a ZBTB18-related disorder in a fetus, which emphasizes the challenging diagnosis of subtle findings, that mandates a high level of clinical suspicion and a targeted follow-up throughout pregnancy.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals working in prenatal diagnosis toward expanded non-invasive prenatal testing in China

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in prenatal diagnosis toward expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in China.

METHODS

We conducted a national online survey among HCPs working in prenatal diagnosis, including specialists in prenatal diagnosis and foetal medicine, obstetricians and gynaecologists, nurses in obstetrics and gynaecology, obstetric ultrasound doctors, and technicians in prenatal diagnosis laboratories. A total of 1882 questionnaires were collected, among which 1822 questionnaires met the research criteria and were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

More than 99% of all participants opted for NIPT for trisomies 21, 18, and 13. The rates of support for expanded NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, microdeletions and microduplications, and single-gene disorders were 93.9%, 88.6%, 89.4%, and 86.8%, respectively. Specialists in prenatal diagnosis and foetal medicine had greater knowledge but were less likely to support expanded NIPT compared to other participants. Knowledge increased with educational level, whereas support for expanded NIPT decreased with educational level.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 80% of HCPs working in prenatal diagnosis in China expressed support for expanding NIPT to conditions other than common trisomies. The degree of knowledge was negatively associated with the rate of support.

How genomics is changing the practice of prenatal testing

New genomic laboratory technology namely microarrays and high throughput sequencing (HTS) as well as a steady progress in sonographic image capture and processing have changed the practice of prenatal diagnosis during the last decade fundamentally. Pregnancies at high risk for common trisomies are reliably identified by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and expert sonography has greatly improved the assessment of the fetal phenotype. Preconceptional comprehensive carrier screening using HTS is available for all parents, if they should wish to do so. A definite fetal diagnosis, however, will still require invasive testing for most conditions. Chromosomal microarrays (CMA) have greatly enhanced the resolution in the detection of chromosome anomalies and other causal copy number variations (CNV). Gene panel or whole exome sequencing (WES) is becoming the routine follow up of many anomalies detected by ultrasound after CNVs have been excluded. The benefits and limitations of the various screening as well as diagnostic options are perceived as complex by many who find it challenging to cope with the need for immediate choices. The communication of facts to ensure an informed decision making is obviously a growing challenge with the advent of the new genomic testing options. This contribution provides an overview of the current practice and policies in Switzerland.

The potential of expanded noninvasive prenatal screening for detection of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical potential of a higher resolution noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS-Plus) test for detection of microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (MMS) in addition to common aneuploidies.

METHODS

In a multicenter prospective study, 37,002 pregnant women with unremarkable first-trimester ultrasound scans had a NIPS-Plus test. Ultrasound screen positive women were not included in this study.

RESULTS

Of 36,970 ultrasound negative women there were 291 NIPS-Plus screen positive results indicating 237 aneuploidies and 54 MMS. Following amniocentesis, 171 (72%) were confirmed as genuine, comprising 3 T13s, 10 T18s, 61 T21s, 70 SCAs and 27 MMS. The PPV for MMS with unremarkable ultrasound findings was 50%. Routine clinical examination of children born from NIPS-Plus negative pregnancies revealed no obvious signs of chromosome disease syndromes at one year of age.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS-Plus has the potential for clinical utility not only for routine aneuploid screening but also for MMS that do not show overt signs during early pregnancy ultrasound screening. We suggest that ultrasound with NIPS-Plus in combination with appropriate counselling could be considered as a comprehensive first-tier prenatal screening approach for all pregnant women.