Polypharmacy and risk of acute pancreatitis

Pancreatitis-Associated Medication Use in Hospitalized Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is (1) to describe the prevalence of pancreatitis-associated medication (PAM) use at admission and discharge in pediatric and young adult patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis (AP) and (2) to describe the prevalence of PAM use at admission in patients classified as having idiopathic AP.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center retrospective study of patients <21 years who were hospitalized with AP or acute recurrent pancreatitis from March 2015 to July 2017 was performed. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, etiology of pancreatitis, comorbidities, and use of PAMs at admission and discharge. PAMs were defined and scored based on an evidence-based classification system, with class I PAMs having strongest evidence for causation. Standard descriptive statistics were used to report prevalence data.

RESULTS

Our cohort was comprised of 119 patients; 50% of patients were using a PAM at admission and 67% were taking a PAM at discharge, reflecting a significant change (P = 0.0009); 44% of patients classified as having idiopathic pancreatitis were taking a PAM on admission, reflecting a possibly missed role of medication in their presentation. Comorbidities significantly associated with PAM use included seizure disorder (P = 0.005) and oncologic disease (P = 0.005). The most commonly used class I PAMs were omeprazole, trimethoprim-sulfamethazole, valproic acid, and 6-mercaptopurine. The increase in prevalence of PAM use at discharge compared to admission was partially driven by addition of omeprazole to the outpatient medication regimen during the hospital stay (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Medications likely play an under-recognized role in pediatric AP. The practice of using proton pump inhibitors in management of AP warrants further study.

Antipsychotic drugs and risk of acute pancreatitis: A nationwide case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Use of antipsychotic drugs, especially second-generation agents, has been suggested to cause acute pancreatitis in multiple case reports; however, such an association has not been corroborated by larger studies. This study examined the association of antipsychotic drugs with risk of acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Nationwide case-control study, based on data from several Swedish registers and including all 52,006 cases of acute pancreatitis diagnosed in Sweden between 2006 and 2019 (with up to 10 controls per case; n = 518,081). Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) in current and past users of first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic drugs (dispensed prescription <91 and ≥91 days of the index date, respectively) compared with never users of such drugs.

RESULTS

In the crude model, first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic drugs were associated with increased risk of acute pancreatitis, with slightly higher ORs for past use (1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.48-1.69] and 1.39 [1.29-1.49], respectively) than for current use (1.34 [1.21-1.48] and 1.24 [1.15-1.34], respectively). The ORs were largely attenuated in the multivariable model-which included, among others, alcohol abuse and the Charlson comorbidity index-up to the point where only a statistically significant association remained for past use of first-generation agents (OR 1.18 [1.10-1.26]).

CONCLUSION

There was no clear association between use of antipsychotic drugs and risk of acute pancreatitis in this very large case-control study, indicating that previous case report data are most likely explained by confounding.

Outcomes of drug-induced acute pancreatitis: a ten-year experience of an academic center

BACKGROUND

drug-induced pancreatitis is an unexplored entity.

METHODS

a retrospective cohort study was performed at a referral center. Patients with drug-induced acute pancreatitis between 2008 and 2018 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, involved drugs, clinical course and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

drug-induced pancreatitis represented 2.8 % of acute pancreatitis (47/1,665) and 18 different drugs were involved (thiopurines 61.8 %). The latency period was less than one month in 87.2 % of cases. Pancreatitis was mild in 89.3 % and recurrence risk was 2.3 %.

CONCLUSION

drugs are a rare cause of pancreatitis, which mostly occurs within the first month of treatment, is usually mild and is associated with a low risk of recurrence.

A Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Drugs are considered a relatively rare and understudied cause of acute pancreatitis (AP). The lack of convincing and conclusive data on drug-induced AP (DIAP) complicates the diagnosis as well as the identification of the causative drug. The aim of this study is to document causes of DIAP cases that occurred in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (SLSJ) population.

METHODS

We have conducted a retrospective and descriptive population-based study of DIAP cases that occurred between 2006 and 2014 in the six hospitals serving the entire SLSJ population. Cases were selected from the Quebec Ministry of Health hospitalizations registry (MED-ECHO) administrative public database. A medical chart review was performed in an attempt to characterize DIAP hospitalizations and to identify the imputable drugs.

RESULTS

During the studied period, 75 cases (30.7% male, 69.3% female) were included totaling 90 hospitalizations for DIAP. Among them, 50 causative drugs were identified and were distributed in 17 different drug classes. Recurrent DIAPs were documented in 13 cases, and among them, 6 cases have experimented a positive rechallenge. Six drugs (5-fluorouracil, atorvastatin, bortezomib, nilotinib, rosuvastatin, and triamcinolone) were associated with the highest degree of evidence. The most common causative drugs of DIAP hospitalization were azathioprine (n = 7), followed by atorvastatin (n = 6), hydrochlorothiazide (n = 5), rosuvastatin (n = 4), and codeine (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has added new evidences about potentially pancreatitis-associated drugs in literature. This is the first study to report definite 5-fluorouracil- and triamcinolone-induced AP. An updated version of the evidence-based literature review is needed to support the clinicians in the identification of the causative drugs.

Pharmacovigilance Assessment of Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis Using a Spontaneous Reporting Database

Background:

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with risks of morbidity and mortality. The incidence of AP recently increased compared to that traditionally reported in the literature.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible association between AP and drugs using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, which is a spontaneous reporting database of adverse drug events.

Methods:

Adverse event reports submitted to the JADER database between 2004 and 2017 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals for signal detection.

Results:

A total of 3,443 reports (0.17% of all adverse events) were identified as drug-induced AP, in which 431 different drugs were involved. Acute pancreatitis was frequently reported in men (58.5%) in their 60s (19.1%); 40.6% developed AP within 4 weeks after the treatment. Among the most frequently reported drugs, signals were detected for prednisolone, ribavirin, sitagliptin, mesalazine, tacrolimus, and l-asparaginase, which are well-known causes of AP. Telaprevir, donepezil, and ustekinumab also generated signals. As for drugs with high RORs, l-asparaginase and alogliptin were noteworthy.

Conclusion:

Most of the identified drugs were already known to induce AP, but the likelihood of the reporting of AP varied among the drugs. Our results should raise physicians’ awareness of drugs associated with AP, but further investigation of these medications is warranted.

Acute pancreatitis associated with intravenous administration of propofol: evaluation of causality in a systematic review of the literature

Acute pancreatitis (AP) associated with intravenous administration of propofol has been described with unknown causal relation. We therefore assessed this causality in a systematic review. Multiple databases were searched on 16 August 2017; studies were appraised and selected by two reviewers based on a priori criteria. Propofol causality was evaluated with the Naranjo scale and Badalov classification. We identified 18 studies from 11 countries with a total of 21 patients, and the majority had adequate methodological quality. The median age was 35 years (range, 4-77) and 10 (48%) were males. Overall, propofol was administrated in 8 patients as sedative along with induction/maintenance of anesthesia in 13 patients; median dose was 200 mg, with intermediate latency (1-30 days) in 14 (67%). Serum triglycerides were >1000 mg/dL in four patients. Severe AP was observed in four patients (19%). AP recurrence occurred in one out of two patients who underwent rechallenge. Mortality related to AP was 3/21(14%). Propofol was the probable cause of AP according to the Naranjo scale in 19 patients (89%). Propofol-induced AP has a probable causal relation and evidence supports Badalov class Ib. Hypertriglyceridemia is not the only mechanism by which propofol illicit AP. Propofol-induced AP was severe in 19% of patients with a mortality rate related to AP of 14%. Future research is needed to delineate whether this risk is higher if combined with other procedures that portend inherent risk of pancreatitis such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Causative Agents of Drug-Induced Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Assessment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze causes of drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) in Korea and factors associated with serious DIAP.

METHODS

Case records of DIAP voluntarily reported to the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System from 2004 to 2013 were reviewed. When a patient took 2 or more drugs, each drug was identified as a potential cause. The seriousness of each case was determined based on the International Conference on Harmonization E2D Guideline. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the seriousness of DIAP.

RESULTS

During the study period, 210 (0.05%) of 442,523 adverse event reports were (0.05%) DIAP. The most common causative medication of the DIAP cases with certain, probable/likely, and possible causality (n = 74) was L-asparaginase (n = 18), followed by azathioprine (n = 6), methylprednisolone (n = 6), and fenofibrate (n = 5). Serious events occurred in 43 cases (58%) with certain, probable/likely, and possible causality. They were significantly associated with the year of report (odds ratio, 0.572; P = 0.025) and the number of concurrently used medications (odds ratio, 2.659; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

L-Asparaginase is the most common cause of DIAP in Korea. Serious DIAP is more likely to occur in patients taking multiple medications.

Oral metronidazole use and risk of acute pancreatitis: a population-based case-control study

Objective

Oral metronidazole used in combined regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication has been associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis; however, it is less clear whether a similar association exists for single-regimen metronidazole. We, therefore, examined the association of single and combined regimens of oral metronidazole with risk of acute pancreatitis.

Methods

In this population-based case-control study, all individuals in Sweden (aged 40-84 years) hospitalized with acute pancreatitis between January 2006 and December 2008 were identified from a national hospital register (n=5,996). Controls, matched for calendar year, age, and sex, were randomly sampled from a national population register (n=60,681). Data on oral metronidazole and covariates were extracted from national health and prescription registers. Odds ratios (ORs) of acute pancreatitis, according to timing of the latest metronidazole prescription before hospitalization, were estimated using logistic regression models. Confounding by indication was examined by contrasting the main results with the association when amoxicillin was used as exposure. The robustness of results was examined by calculating incidence rate ratios using a self-controlled case series approach.

Results

After adjustment for potential confounders, there was a substantially increased risk of acute pancreatitis within 30 days of oral metronidazole exposure, both for single (OR: 4.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.90-8.64) and combined (OR: 11.80; 95% CI: 6.86-20.28) regimens, compared to nonexposure. In contrast, the adjusted OR was 1.79 (95% CI: 1.25-2.54) for current use of amoxicillin compared to nonexposure. These results were supported by the self-controlled cases series analysis (incidence rate ratio: 3.30; 95% CI: 2.69-4.06, for single and combined regimens of oral metronidazole pooled). There was no strong association between oral metronidazole and acute pancreatitis more than 30 days after exposure.

Conclusion

There was an increased risk of acute pancreatitis within 30 days of exposure to single and combined regimens of oral metronidazole. While reverse causality and confounding by indication cannot be entirely excluded, they are unlikely to fully explain the association. These results warrant an increased awareness among physicians.