1
|
Liang T, Chen H, Liu L, Zheng Y, Ma Z, Min L, Zhang J, Wu L, Ma J, Liu Z, Zhang Q, Luo K, Hu D, Ji T, Yu X. Antibody Profiling of Pan-Cancer Viral Proteome Reveals Biomarkers for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Prognosis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2024; 23:100729. [PMID: 38309569 PMCID: PMC10933552 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Diagnosing, predicting disease outcome, and identifying effective treatment targets for virus-related cancers are lacking. Protein biomarkers have the potential to bridge the gap between prevention and treatment for these types of cancers. While it has been shown that certain antibodies against EBV proteins could be used to detect nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), antibodies targeting are solely a tiny part of the about 80 proteins expressed by the EBV genome. Furthermore, it remains unclear what role other viruses play in NPC since many diseases are the result of multiple viral infections. For the first time, this study measured both IgA and IgG antibody responses against 646 viral proteins from 23 viruses in patients with NPC and control subjects using nucleic acid programmable protein arrays. Candidate seromarkers were then validated by ELISA using 1665 serum samples from three clinical cohorts. We demonstrated that the levels of five candidate seromarkers (EBV-BLLF3-IgA, EBV-BLRF2-IgA, EBV-BLRF2-IgG, EBV-BDLF1-IgA, EBV-BDLF1-IgG) in NPC patients were significantly elevated than controls. Additional examination revealed that NPC could be successfully diagnosed by combining the clinical biomarker EBNA1-IgA with the five anti-EBV antibodies. The sensitivity of the six-antibody signature at 95% specificity to diagnose NPC was comparable to the current clinically-approved biomarker combination, VCA-IgA, and EBNA1-IgA. However, the recombinant antigens of the five antibodies are easier to produce and standardize compared to the native viral VCA proteins. This suggests the potential replacement of the traditional VCA-IgA assay with the 5-antibodies combination to screen and diagnose NPC. Additionally, we investigated the prognostic significance of these seromarkers titers in NPC. We showed that NPC patients with elevated BLLF3-IgA and BDLF1-IgA titers in their serum exhibited significantly poorer disease-free survival, suggesting the potential of these two seromarkers as prognostic indicators of NPC. These findings will help develop serological tests to detect and treat NPC in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Te Liang
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Forest Pest Control, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences-Beijing (PHOENIX Center), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China
| | - Yongqiang Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhaoen Ma
- Otolaryngological department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling Min
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences-Beijing (PHOENIX Center), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China
| | - Lianfu Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences-Beijing (PHOENIX Center), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences-Beijing (PHOENIX Center), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China
| | - Zexian Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingfeng Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Luo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Di Hu
- ProteomicsEra Medical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Tianxing Ji
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Xiaobo Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences-Beijing (PHOENIX Center), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qiu J, Engelbrektson A, Song L, Park J, Murugan V, Williams S, Chung Y, Pompa-Mera EN, Sandoval-Ramirez JL, Mata-Marin JA, Gaytan-Martinez J, Troiani E, Sanguinetti M, Roncada P, Urbani A, Moretti G, Torres J, LaBaer J. Comparative Analysis of Antimicrobial Antibodies between Mild and Severe COVID-19. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0469022. [PMID: 37278651 PMCID: PMC10433851 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04690-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) exhibit a broad spectrum of clinical presentations. A person's antimicrobial antibody profile, as partially shaped by past infection or vaccination, can reflect the immune system health that is critical to control and resolve the infection. We performed an explorative immunoproteomics study using microbial protein arrays displaying 318 full-length antigens from 77 viruses and 3 bacteria. We compared antimicrobial antibody profiles between 135 patients with mild COVID-19 disease and 215 patients with severe disease in 3 independent cohorts from Mexico and Italy. Severe disease patients were older with higher prevalence of comorbidities. We confirmed that severe disease patients elicited a stronger anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) response. We showed that antibodies against HCoV-229E and HcoV-NL63 but not against HcoV-HKU1 and HcoV-OC43 were also higher in those who had severe disease. We revealed that for a set of IgG and IgA antibodies targeting coronaviruses, herpesviruses, and other respiratory viruses, a subgroup of patients with the highest reactivity levels had a greater incidence of severe disease compared to those with mild disease across all three cohorts. On the contrary, fewer antibodies showed consistent greater prevalence in mild disease in all 3 cohorts. IMPORTANCE The clinical presentations of COVID-19 range from asymptomatic to critical illness that may lead to intensive care or even death. The health of the immune system, as partially shaped by past infections or vaccinations, is critical to control and resolve the infection. Using an innovative protein array platform, we surveyed antibodies against hundreds of full-length microbial antigens from 80 different viruses and bacteria in COVID-19 patients from different geographic regions with mild or severe disease. We not only confirmed the association of severe COVID-19 disease with higher reactivity of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 but also uncovered known and novel associations with antibody responses against herpesviruses and other respiratory viruses. Our study represents a significant step forward in understanding the factors contributing to COVID-19 disease severity. We also demonstrate the power of comprehensive antimicrobial antibody profiling in deciphering risk factors for severe COVID-19. We anticipate that our approach will have broad applications in infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Qiu
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Anna Engelbrektson
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Lusheng Song
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Jin Park
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Vel Murugan
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Stacy Williams
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Yunro Chung
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Ericka Nelly Pompa-Mera
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitarias, UMAE Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
- Hospital de Infectología, CMN “La Raza”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Jose Antonio Mata-Marin
- Hospital de Infectología, CMN “La Raza”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jesus Gaytan-Martinez
- Hospital de Infectología, CMN “La Raza”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Maurizio Sanguinetti
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Roncada
- Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Urbani
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Moretti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Javier Torres
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitarias, UMAE Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shome M, Gao W, Engelbrektson A, Song L, Williams S, Murugan V, Park JG, Chung Y, LaBaer J, Qiu J. Comparative Microbiomics Analysis of Antimicrobial Antibody Response between Patients with Lung Cancer and Control Subjects with Benign Pulmonary Nodules. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:496-504. [PMID: 36066883 PMCID: PMC10494706 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT screening can detect lung cancer early but suffers a high false-positive rate. There is a need for molecular biomarkers that can distinguish malignant and benign indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) detected by CT scan. METHODS We profiled antibodies against 901 individual microbial antigens from 27 bacteria and 29 viruses in sera from 127 lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), 123 smoker controls (SMC), 170 benign nodule controls (BNC) individuals using protein microarrays to identify ADC and BNC specific antimicrobial antibodies. RESULTS Analyzing fourth quartile ORs, we found more antibodies with higher prevalence in the three BNC subgroups than in ADC or SMC. We demonstrated that significantly more anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies showed higher prevalence in ADC relative to SMC. We performed subgroup analysis and found that more antibodies with higher prevalence in light smokers (≤20 pack-years) compared with heavy smokers (>20 pack-years), in BNC with nodule size >1 cm than in those with ≤1 cm nodules, and in stage I ADC than in stage II and III ADC. We performed multivariate analysis and constructed antibody panels that can distinguish ADC versus SMC and ADC versus BNC with area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.88 and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Antimicrobial antibodies have the potential to reduce the false positive rate of CT screening and provide interesting insight in lung cancer development. IMPACT Microbial infection plays an important role in lung cancer development and the formation of benign pulmonary nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahasish Shome
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Weimin Gao
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | | | - Lusheng Song
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Stacy Williams
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Vel Murugan
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Jin G. Park
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Yunro Chung
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Ji Qiu
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li S, Song G, Bai Y, Song N, Zhao J, Liu J, Hu C. Applications of Protein Microarrays in Biomarker Discovery for Autoimmune Diseases. Front Immunol 2021; 12:645632. [PMID: 34012435 PMCID: PMC8126629 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.645632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Dysregulated autoantibodies and cytokines were deemed to provide important cues for potential illnesses, such as various carcinomas and autoimmune diseases. Increasing biotechnological approaches have been applied to screen and identify the specific alterations of these biomolecules as distinctive biomarkers in diseases, especially autoimmune diseases. As a versatile and robust platform, protein microarray technology allows researchers to easily profile dysregulated autoantibodies and cytokines associated with autoimmune diseases using various biological specimens, mainly serum samples. Here, we summarize the applications of protein microarrays in biomarker discovery for autoimmune diseases. In addition, the key issues in the process of using this approach are presented for improving future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siting Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Department of Rheumatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China
| | - Guang Song
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Yina Bai
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Department of Rheumatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China
| | - Ning Song
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Department of Rheumatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China
| | - Jiuliang Zhao
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Department of Rheumatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Rheumatology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Aerospace, Clinical Medical College, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Chaojun Hu
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Department of Rheumatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Identification of Antibody Biomarker Using High-Density Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Array. Methods Mol Biol 2021; 2344:47-64. [PMID: 34115351 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1562-1_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
A novel protein microarray technology, called high-density nucleic acid programmable protein array (HD-NAPPA), enables the serological screening of thousands of proteins at one time. HD-NAPPA extends the capabilities of NAPPA, which produces protein microarrays on a conventional glass microscope slide. By comparison, HD-NAPPA displays proteins in over 10,000 nanowells etched in a silicon slide. Proteins on HD-NAPPA are expressed in the individual isolated nanowells, via in vitro transcription and translation (IVTT), without any diffusion during incubation. Here we describe the method for antibody biomarker identification using HD-NAPPA, including four main steps: (1) HD-NAPPA array protein expression, (2) primary antibodies (serum/plasma) probing, (3) secondary antibody visualization, and (4) image scanning and data processing.
Collapse
|
6
|
Song L, Song M, Rabkin CS, Williams S, Chung Y, Van Duine J, Liao LM, Karthikeyan K, Gao W, Park JG, Tang Y, Lissowska J, Qiu J, LaBaer J, Camargo MC. Helicobacter pylori Immunoproteomic Profiles in Gastric Cancer. J Proteome Res 2020; 20:409-419. [PMID: 33108201 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Chronic Helicobacter pylori infection is the major risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). However, only some infected individuals develop this neoplasia. Previous H. pylori serology studies have been limited by investigating small numbers of candidate antigens. Therefore, we evaluated humoral responses to a nearly complete H. pylori immunoproteome (1527 proteins) among 50 GC cases and 50 controls using Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Array (NAPPA). Seropositivity was defined as median normalized intensity ≥2 on NAPPA, and 53 anti-H. pylori antibodies had >10% seroprevalence. Anti-GroEL exhibited the greatest seroprevalence (77% overall), which agreed well with ELISA using whole-cell lysates of H. pylori cells. After an initial screen by H. pylori-NAPPA, we discovered and verified that 12 antibodies by ELISA in controls had ≥15% of samples with an optical reading value exceeding the 95th percentile of the GC group. ELISA-verified antibodies were validated blindly in an independent set of 100 case-control pairs. As expected, anti-CagA seropositivity was positively associated with GC (odds ratio, OR = 5.5; p < 0.05). After validation, six anti-H. pylori antibodies showed lower seropositivity in GC, with ORs ranging from 0.44 to 0.12 (p < 0.05): anti-HP1118/Ggt, anti-HP0516/HsIU, anti-HP0243/NapA, anti-HP1293/RpoA, anti-HP0371/FabE, and anti-HP0875/KatA. Among all combinations, a model with anti-Ggt, anti-HslU, anti-NapA, and anti-CagA had an area under the curve of 0.73 for discriminating GC vs. controls. This study represents the first comprehensive assessment of anti-H. pylori humoral profiles in GC. Decreased responses to multiple proteins in GC may reflect mucosal damage and decreased bacterial burden. The higher prevalence of specific anti-H. pylori antibodies in controls may suggest immune protection against GC development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lusheng Song
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Minkyo Song
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20892-2590, United States
| | - Charles S Rabkin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20892-2590, United States
| | - Stacy Williams
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Yunro Chung
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States.,College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona 85004, United States
| | - Jennifer Van Duine
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Linda M Liao
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20892-2590, United States
| | - Kailash Karthikeyan
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Weimin Gao
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Jin G Park
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Yanyang Tang
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, 02-034 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ji Qiu
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5001, United States
| | - M Constanza Camargo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20892-2590, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kobayashi M, Katayama H, Fahrmann JF, Hanash SM. Development of autoantibody signatures for common cancers. Semin Immunol 2020; 47:101388. [DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2020.101388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
8
|
Qi H, Wang F, Tao SC. Proteome microarray technology and application: higher, wider, and deeper. Expert Rev Proteomics 2019; 16:815-827. [PMID: 31469014 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2019.1662303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Protein microarray is a powerful tool for both biological study and clinical research. The most useful features of protein microarrays are their miniaturized size (low reagent and sample consumption), high sensitivity and their capability for parallel/high-throughput analysis. The major focus of this review is functional proteome microarray. Areas covered: For proteome microarray, this review will discuss some recently constructed proteome microarrays and new concepts that have been used for constructing proteome microarrays and data interpretation in past few years, such as PAGES, M-NAPPA strategy, VirD technology, and the first protein microarray database. this review will summarize recent proteomic scale applications and address the limitations and future directions of proteome microarray technology. Expert opinion: Proteome microarray is a powerful tool for basic biological and clinical research. It is expected to see improvements in the currently used proteome microarrays and the construction of more proteome microarrays for other species by using traditional strategies or novel concepts. It is anticipated that the maximum number of features on a single microarray and the number of possible applications will be increased, and the information that can be obtained from proteome microarray experiments will more in-depth in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Qi
- Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Fei Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| | - Sheng-Ce Tao
- Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pflughoeft KJ, Mash M, Hasenkampf NR, Jacobs MB, Tardo AC, Magee DM, Song L, LaBaer J, Philipp MT, Embers ME, AuCoin DP. Multi-platform Approach for Microbial Biomarker Identification Using Borrelia burgdorferi as a Model. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019; 9:179. [PMID: 31245298 PMCID: PMC6579940 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of microbial biomarkers is critical for the diagnosis of a disease early during infection. However, the identification of reliable biomarkers is often hampered by a low concentration of microbes or biomarkers within host fluids or tissues. We have outlined a multi-platform strategy to assess microbial biomarkers that can be consistently detected in host samples, using Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, as an example. Key aspects of the strategy include the selection of a macaque model of human disease, in vivo Microbial Antigen Discovery (InMAD), and proteomic methods that include microbial biomarker enrichment within samples to identify secreted proteins circulating during infection. Using the described strategy, we have identified 6 biomarkers from multiple samples. In addition, the temporal antibody response to select bacterial antigens was mapped. By integrating biomarkers identified from early infection with temporal patterns of expression, the described platform allows for the data driven selection of diagnostic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn J. Pflughoeft
- DxDiscovery, Inc., Reno, NV, United States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States
| | - Michael Mash
- DxDiscovery, Inc., Reno, NV, United States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States
| | - Nicole R. Hasenkampf
- Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, LA, United States
| | - Mary B. Jacobs
- Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, LA, United States
| | - Amanda C. Tardo
- Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, LA, United States
| | - D. Mitchell Magee
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
| | - Lusheng Song
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
| | - Mario T. Philipp
- Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, LA, United States
| | - Monica E. Embers
- Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, LA, United States
| | - David P. AuCoin
- DxDiscovery, Inc., Reno, NV, United States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A decade of Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays (NAPPA) availability: News, actors, progress, prospects and access. J Proteomics 2018; 198:27-35. [PMID: 30553075 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the dynamic of the proteome is a critical challenge because it requires high sensitive methodologies in high-throughput formats in order to decipher its modifications and complexity. While molecular biology provides relevant information about cell physiology that may be reflected in post-translational changes, High-Throughput (HT) experimental proteomic techniques are essential to provide valuable functional information of the proteins, peptides and the interconnections between them. Hence, many methodological developments and innovations have been reported during the last decade. To study more dynamic protein networks and fine interactions, Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays (NAPPA) was introduced a decade ago. The tool is rapidly maturing and serving as a gateway to characterize biological systems and diseases thanks primarily to its accuracy, reproducibility, throughput and flexibility. Currently, NAPPA technology has proved successful in several research areas adding valuable information towards innovative diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Here, the basic and latest advances within this modern technology in basic, translational research are reviewed, in addition to presenting its exciting new directions. Our final goal is to encourage more scientists/researchers to incorporate this method, which can help to remove bottlenecks in their particular research or biomedical projects. SIGNIFICANCE: Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays (NAPPA) is becoming an essential tool for functional proteomics and protein-protein interaction studies. The technology impacts decisively on projects aiming massive screenings and the latest innovations like the multiplexing capability or printing consistency make this a promising method to be integrated in novel and combinatorial proteomic approaches.
Collapse
|
11
|
Shores DR, Everett AD. Children as Biomarker Orphans: Progress in the Field of Pediatric Biomarkers. J Pediatr 2018; 193:14-20.e31. [PMID: 29031860 PMCID: PMC5794519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Revised: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Darla R Shores
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Allen D Everett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cell-free protein microarrays represent a special form of protein microarray which display proteins made fresh at the time of the experiment, avoiding storage and denaturation. They have been used increasingly in basic and translational research over the past decade to study protein-protein interactions, the pathogen-host relationship, post-translational modifications, and antibody biomarkers of different human diseases. Their role in the first blood-based diagnostic test for early stage breast cancer highlights their value in managing human health. Cell-free protein microarrays will continue to evolve to become widespread tools for research and clinical management. Areas covered: We review the advantages and disadvantages of different cell-free protein arrays, with an emphasis on the methods that have been studied in the last five years. We also discuss the applications of each microarray method. Expert commentary: Given the growing roles and impact of cell-free protein microarrays in research and medicine, we discuss: 1) the current technical and practical limitations of cell-free protein microarrays; 2) the biomarker discovery and verification pipeline using protein microarrays; and 3) how cell-free protein microarrays will advance over the next five years, both in their technology and applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaobo Yu
- a State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences , Beijing Institute of Lifeomics , Beijing , China
| | - Brianne Petritis
- b The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute , Arizona State University , Tempe , AZ , USA
| | - Hu Duan
- a State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences , Beijing Institute of Lifeomics , Beijing , China
| | - Danke Xu
- c State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering , Nanjing University , Nanjing , China
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- b The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute , Arizona State University , Tempe , AZ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yu X, Song L, Petritis B, Bian X, Wang H, Viloria J, Park J, Bui H, Li H, Wang J, Liu L, Yang L, Duan H, McMurray DN, Achkar JM, Magee M, Qiu J, LaBaer J. Multiplexed Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays. Theranostics 2017; 7:4057-4070. [PMID: 29109798 PMCID: PMC5667425 DOI: 10.7150/thno.20151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Cell-free protein microarrays display naturally-folded proteins based on just-in-time in situ synthesis, and have made important contributions to basic and translational research. However, the risk of spot-to-spot cross-talk from protein diffusion during expression has limited the feature density of these arrays. Methods: In this work, we developed the Multiplexed Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Array (M-NAPPA), which significantly increases the number of displayed proteins by multiplexing as many as five different gene plasmids within a printed spot. Results: Even when proteins of different sizes were displayed within the same feature, they were readily detected using protein-specific antibodies. Protein-protein interactions and serological antibody assays using human viral proteome microarrays demonstrated that comparable hits were detected by M-NAPPA and non-multiplexed NAPPA arrays. An ultra-high density proteome microarray displaying > 16k proteins on a single microscope slide was produced by combining M-NAPPA with a photolithography-based silicon nano-well platform. Finally, four new tuberculosis-related antigens in guinea pigs vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) were identified with M-NAPPA and validated with ELISA. Conclusion: All data demonstrate that multiplexing features on a protein microarray offer a cost-effective fabrication approach and have the potential to facilitate high throughput translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaobo Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (PHOENIX Center, Beijing), Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Lusheng Song
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Brianne Petritis
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Xiaofang Bian
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Haoyu Wang
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Jennifer Viloria
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Jin Park
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Hoang Bui
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Han Li
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Jie Wang
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Lei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (PHOENIX Center, Beijing), Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Liuhui Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (PHOENIX Center, Beijing), Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Hu Duan
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (PHOENIX Center, Beijing), Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - David N. McMurray
- Department of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | - Jacqueline M. Achkar
- Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY 10461, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Mitch Magee
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Ji Qiu
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jean Beltran PM, Federspiel JD, Sheng X, Cristea IM. Proteomics and integrative omic approaches for understanding host-pathogen interactions and infectious diseases. Mol Syst Biol 2017; 13:922. [PMID: 28348067 PMCID: PMC5371729 DOI: 10.15252/msb.20167062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Organisms are constantly exposed to microbial pathogens in their environments. When a pathogen meets its host, a series of intricate intracellular interactions shape the outcome of the infection. The understanding of these host–pathogen interactions is crucial for the development of treatments and preventive measures against infectious diseases. Over the past decade, proteomic approaches have become prime contributors to the discovery and understanding of host–pathogen interactions that represent anti‐ and pro‐pathogenic cellular responses. Here, we review these proteomic methods and their application to studying viral and bacterial intracellular pathogens. We examine approaches for defining spatial and temporal host–pathogen protein interactions upon infection of a host cell. Further expanding the understanding of proteome organization during an infection, we discuss methods that characterize the regulation of host and pathogen proteomes through alterations in protein abundance, localization, and post‐translational modifications. Finally, we highlight bioinformatic tools available for analyzing such proteomic datasets, as well as novel strategies for integrating proteomics with other omic tools, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, to obtain a systems‐level understanding of infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre M Jean Beltran
- Department of Molecular Biology, Lewis Thomas Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Joel D Federspiel
- Department of Molecular Biology, Lewis Thomas Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Xinlei Sheng
- Department of Molecular Biology, Lewis Thomas Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Ileana M Cristea
- Department of Molecular Biology, Lewis Thomas Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Song L, Wallstrom G, Yu X, Hopper M, Van Duine J, Steel J, Park J, Wiktor P, Kahn P, Brunner A, Wilson D, Jenny-Avital ER, Qiu J, Labaer J, Magee DM, Achkar JM. Identification of Antibody Targets for Tuberculosis Serology using High-Density Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays. Mol Cell Proteomics 2017; 16:S277-S289. [PMID: 28223349 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m116.065953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Better and more diverse biomarkers for the development of simple point-of-care tests for active tuberculosis (TB), a clinically heterogeneous disease, are urgently needed. We generated a proteomic Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) High-Density Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Array (HD-NAPPA) that used a novel multiplexed strategy for expedited high-throughput screening for antibody responses to the Mtb proteome. We screened sera from HIV uninfected and coinfected TB patients and controls (n = 120) from the US and South Africa (SA) using the multiplex HD-NAPPA for discovery, followed by deconvolution and validation through single protein HD-NAPPA with biologically independent samples (n = 124). We verified the top proteins with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using the original screening and validation samples (n = 244) and heretofore untested samples (n = 41). We identified 8 proteins with TB biomarker value; four (Rv0054, Rv0831c, Rv2031c and Rv0222) of these were previously identified in serology studies, and four (Rv0948c, Rv2853, Rv3405c, Rv3544c) were not known to elicit antibody responses. Using ELISA data, we created classifiers that could discriminate patients' TB status according to geography (US or SA) and HIV (HIV- or HIV+) status. With ROC curve analysis under cross validation, the classifiers performed with an AUC for US/HIV- at 0.807; US/HIV+ at 0.782; SA/HIV- at 0.868; and SA/HIV+ at 0.723. With this study we demonstrate a new platform for biomarker/antibody screening and delineate its utility to identify previously unknown immunoreactive proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lusheng Song
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - Garrick Wallstrom
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - Xiaobo Yu
- §State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences-Beijing (PHOENIX Center), Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Marika Hopper
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - Jennifer Van Duine
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - Jason Steel
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - Jin Park
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - Peter Wiktor
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287.,¶Engineering Arts LLC, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Peter Kahn
- ¶Engineering Arts LLC, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Al Brunner
- ¶Engineering Arts LLC, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Douglas Wilson
- ‖Department of Internal Medicine, Edendale Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| | | | - Ji Qiu
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - Joshua Labaer
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287
| | - D Mitchell Magee
- From the ‡The Virginia G Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287;
| | - Jacqueline M Achkar
- **Departments of Medicine and .,‡‡Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Greco TM, Cristea IM. Proteomics Tracing the Footsteps of Infectious Disease. Mol Cell Proteomics 2017; 16:S5-S14. [PMID: 28163258 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.o116.066001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Every year, a major cause of human disease and death worldwide is infection with the various pathogens-viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa-that are intrinsic to our ecosystem. In efforts to control the prevalence of infectious disease and develop improved therapies, the scientific community has focused on building a molecular picture of pathogen infection and spread. These studies have been aimed at defining the cellular mechanisms that allow pathogen entry into hosts cells, their replication and transmission, as well as the core mechanisms of host defense against pathogens. The past two decades have demonstrated the valuable implementation of proteomic methods in all these areas of infectious disease research. Here, we provide a perspective on the contributions of mass spectrometry and other proteomics approaches to understanding the molecular details of pathogen infection. Specifically, we highlight methods used for defining the composition of viral and bacterial pathogens and the dynamic interaction with their hosts in space and time. We discuss the promise of MS-based proteomics in supporting the development of diagnostics and therapies, and the growing need for multiomics strategies for gaining a systems view of pathogen infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd M Greco
- From the ‡Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544
| | - Ileana M Cristea
- From the ‡Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bian X, Wasserfall C, Wallstrom G, Wang J, Wang H, Barker K, Schatz D, Atkinson M, Qiu J, LaBaer J. Tracking the Antibody Immunome in Type 1 Diabetes Using Protein Arrays. J Proteome Res 2017; 16:195-203. [PMID: 27690455 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
We performed an unbiased proteome-scale profiling of humoral autoimmunity in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients and nondiabetic controls against ∼10 000 human proteins using a Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Array (NAPPA) platform, complemented by a knowledge-based selection of proteins from genes enriched in human pancreas. Although the global response was similar between cases and controls, we identified and then validated six specific novel T1D-associated autoantibodies (AAbs) with sensitivities that ranged from 16 to 27% at 95% specificity. These included AAbs against PTPRN2, MLH1, MTIF3, PPIL2, NUP50 (from NAPPA screening), and QRFPR (by targeted ELISA). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that NUP50 protein behaved differently in islet cells, where it stained both nucleus and cytoplasm, compared with only nuclear staining in exocrine pancreas. Conversely, PPIL2 staining was absent in islet cells, despite its presence in exocrine cells. The combination of anti-PTPRN2, -MLH1, -PPIL2, and -QRFPR had an AUC of 0.74 and 37.5% sensitivity at 95% specificity. These data indicate that these markers behave independently and support the use of unbiased screening to find biomarkers because the majority was not predicted based on predicted abundance. Our study enriches the knowledge of the "autoantibody-ome" in unprecedented breadth and width.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofang Bian
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Clive Wasserfall
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida 32603, United States
| | - Garrick Wallstrom
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Jie Wang
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Haoyu Wang
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Kristi Barker
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Desmond Schatz
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida 30607, United States
| | - Mark Atkinson
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida 32603, United States
| | - Ji Qiu
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Karthikeyan K, Barker K, Tang Y, Kahn P, Wiktor P, Brunner A, Knabben V, Takulapalli B, Buckner J, Nepom G, LaBaer J, Qiu J. A Contra Capture Protein Array Platform for Studying Post-translationally Modified (PTM) Auto-antigenomes. Mol Cell Proteomics 2016; 15:2324-37. [PMID: 27141097 PMCID: PMC4937507 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m115.057661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2015] [Revised: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Aberrant modifications of proteins occur during disease development and elicit disease-specific antibody responses. We have developed a protein array platform that enables the modification of many proteins in parallel and assesses their immunogenicity without the need to express, purify, and modify proteins individually. We used anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as a model modification and profiled antibody responses to ∼190 citrullinated proteins in 20 RA patients. We observed unique antibody reactivity patterns in both clinical anticyclic citrullinated peptide assay positive (CCP+) and CCP- RA patients. At individual antigen levels, we detected antibodies against known citrullinated autoantigens and discovered and validated five novel antibodies against specific citrullinated antigens (osteopontin (SPP1), flap endonuclease (FEN1), insulin like growth factor binding protein 6 (IGFBP6), insulin like growth factor I (IGF1) and stanniocalcin-2 (STC2)) in RA patients. We also demonstrated the utility of our innovative array platform in the identification of immune-dominant epitope(s) for citrullinated antigens. We believe our platform will promote the study of post-translationally modified antigens at a breadth that has not been achieved before, by both identifying novel autoantigens and investigating their roles in disease development. The developed platforms can potentially be used to study many autoimmune disease-relevant modifications and their immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailash Karthikeyan
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Kristi Barker
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Yanyang Tang
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Peter Kahn
- §Engineering Arts LLC, Phoenix, Arizona 85076
| | - Peter Wiktor
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287; §Engineering Arts LLC, Phoenix, Arizona 85076
| | - Al Brunner
- §Engineering Arts LLC, Phoenix, Arizona 85076
| | - Vinicius Knabben
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Bharath Takulapalli
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Jane Buckner
- ¶Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, Washington 98101
| | - Gerald Nepom
- ¶Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, Washington 98101
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
| | - Ji Qiu
- From the ‡Biodesign Institute, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yu X, Petritis B, LaBaer J. Advancing translational research with next-generation protein microarrays. Proteomics 2016; 16:1238-50. [PMID: 26749402 PMCID: PMC7167888 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2015] [Revised: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Protein microarrays are a high-throughput technology used increasingly in translational research, seeking to apply basic science findings to enhance human health. In addition to assessing protein levels, posttranslational modifications, and signaling pathways in patient samples, protein microarrays have aided in the identification of potential protein biomarkers of disease and infection. In this perspective, the different types of full-length protein microarrays that are used in translational research are reviewed. Specific studies employing these microarrays are presented to highlight their potential in finding solutions to real clinical problems. Finally, the criteria that should be considered when developing next-generation protein microarrays are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaobo Yu
- State Key Laboratory of ProteomicsBeijing Proteome Research CenterNational Center for Protein Sciences (The PHOENIX Center, Beijing)BeijingP. R. China
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized DiagnosticsBiodesign InstituteArizona State UniversityTempeAZUSA
| | - Brianne Petritis
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized DiagnosticsBiodesign InstituteArizona State UniversityTempeAZUSA
| | - Joshua LaBaer
- The Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized DiagnosticsBiodesign InstituteArizona State UniversityTempeAZUSA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lum KK, Cristea IM. Proteomic approaches to uncovering virus-host protein interactions during the progression of viral infection. Expert Rev Proteomics 2016; 13:325-40. [PMID: 26817613 PMCID: PMC4919574 DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2016.1147353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The integration of proteomic methods to virology has facilitated a significant breadth of biological insight into mechanisms of virus replication, antiviral host responses and viral subversion of host defenses. Throughout the course of infection, these cellular mechanisms rely heavily on the formation of temporally and spatially regulated virus-host protein-protein interactions. Reviewed here are proteomic-based approaches that have been used to characterize this dynamic virus-host interplay. Specifically discussed are the contribution of integrative mass spectrometry, antibody-based affinity purification of protein complexes, cross-linking and protein array techniques for elucidating complex networks of virus-host protein associations during infection with a diverse range of RNA and DNA viruses. The benefits and limitations of applying proteomic methods to virology are explored, and the contribution of these approaches to important biological discoveries and to inspiring new tractable avenues for the design of antiviral therapeutics is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystal K Lum
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton
University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Ileana M Cristea
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton
University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Haralambieva IH, Kennedy RB, Ovsyannikova IG, Whitaker JA, Poland GA. Variability in Humoral Immunity to Measles Vaccine: New Developments. Trends Mol Med 2015; 21:789-801. [PMID: 26602762 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Revised: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Despite the existence of an effective measles vaccine, resurgence in measles cases in the USA and across Europe has occurred, including in individuals vaccinated with two doses of the vaccine. Host genetic factors result in inter-individual variation in measles vaccine-induced antibodies, and play a role in vaccine failure. Studies have identified HLA (human leukocyte antigen) and non-HLA genetic influences that individually or jointly contribute to the observed variability in the humoral response to vaccination among healthy individuals. In this exciting era, new high-dimensional approaches and techniques including vaccinomics, systems biology, GWAS, epitope prediction and sophisticated bioinformatics/statistical algorithms provide powerful tools to investigate immune response mechanisms to the measles vaccine. These might predict, on an individual basis, outcomes of acquired immunity post measles vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iana H Haralambieva
- Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Richard B Kennedy
- Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Inna G Ovsyannikova
- Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer A Whitaker
- Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Gregory A Poland
- Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|